View Article

  • In vitro Collagenase Inhibition and IC?? Benchmarking of Woodfordia fruticosa Extract

  • 1 Tatyasaheb College of Pharmacy, Tatyasaheb Kore Vidyanagari, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. 416113

    2 Anandi Pharmacy College, Kalambe, Tarf Kale, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. 416205

Abstract

Collagenase (MMP 1) is a key enzyme in dermal collagen degradation and wrinkle formation. Natural inhibitors from medicinal plants offer promise for anti-aging therapy, but standardized in vitro validations remain scarce. To evaluate the collagenase inhibitory activity of Woodfordia fruticosa flower extract and benchmark its IC?? against published plant-based inhibitors under comparable assay conditions. Flowers of W. fruticosa were collected from the Sahyadri ranges, authenticated, and extracted with ethanol using accelerated solvent extraction. A microplate-based endpoint assay with FALGPA substrate was used to measure collagenase inhibition at 335?nm. Extract dilutions (3.12–400 ?g/mL) were assayed in triplicate, and IC?? was calculated by nonlinear regression. LC MS confirmed the presence of vitexin. Benchmarking was performed with reported IC?? values for Curcuma longa, Camellia sinensis, and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). The ethanol extract of W. fruticosa showed dose-dependent inhibition, with an IC?? of 131.04 ?g/mL. This potency exceeded that of C. longa (~200 ?g/mL) and C. sinensis (~250 ?g/mL) extracts, and comparable with reference polyphenols under the same assay conditions. LC MS confirmed vitexin as a major flavonoid constituent, supporting its role in activity. W. fruticosa extract demonstrates significant collagenase inhibition and compares favorably with established botanicals. The results provide reproducible biochemical evidence supporting its development as a natural anti-aging agent, and establish a standardized reference point for future mechanistic and formulation studies.

Keywords

Woodfordia fruticosa, collagenase inhibition, IC??, enzyme assay, vitexin, anti-aging.

Introduction

Enzyme inhibition assays are pivotal tools in natural product research, serving as a foundation for the discovery of new bioactive compounds and their mechanistic evaluation (1, 3, 4). Among the various enzymatic targets relevant to skin aging, collagenase (matrix metalloproteinase-1, MMP-1) is of particular interest due to its key role in collagen degradation, dermal remodeling, and wrinkle formation (6,10,19).” Suppression of collagenase activity has thus emerged as a validated strategy for developing antiaging agents, both for pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical applications(21, 12, 29, 36).

Woodfordia fruticosa, a traditional medicinal plant, has gained scientific attention for its rich polyphenolic content and emerging skin care benefits(9, 23, 28, 34). While formulation-based studies have begun exploring its applicability in topical antiwrinkle systems, rigorous biochemical validation of its enzyme inhibitory profile remains essential for evidence-based translation and comparative evaluation (2, 11, 29, 25). In particular, determining the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC??) against collagenase under standardized conditions not only provides a quantitative benchmark for its activity but also enables meaningful comparison with published data for both natural and synthetic inhibitors.

This study was designed to:
(1) quantitatively assess the in?vitro collagenase inhibitory activity of a standardized Woodfordia fruticosa extract using a validated microplate-based endpoint assay, and
(2) benchmark the measured IC?? against existing literature values reported for similar plant-derived and reference collagenase inhibitors. By focusing solely on the enzyme inhibition aspect, distinct from parallel efforts in product formulation, the present investigation aims to establish a robust, harmonized reference for biochemical efficacy, while also providing critical data for future mechanistic, preclinical, and translational studies involving Woodfordia fruticosa and comparable botanicals.

Through this approach, we seek to advance standardization in enzyme assay methodology for phytoextracts, facilitate scientific comparison across studies, and support the rational selection of natural anti-collagenase leads for skin health applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Plant Material Collection and Authentication

Woodfordia fruticosa (L.) Kurz flowers were collected during the flowering season from the Sahyadri ranges near Pethwadgaon village, Kolhapur district, Maharashtra, India (16.50° N, 74.19° E). The plant was authenticated at the Botanical Survey of India, Pune, and a voucher specimen (No. BSI/WRC/PI ID.2024/MYK/08) was deposited for future reference.

2.2. Preparation of the Ethanol Extract by Microwave-Assisted Extraction

Shade-dried, coarsely powdered flowers were subjected to accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) using a Dionex™ ASE™ 350 extractor (Thermo Scientific™). The extraction was carried out at 1300–1500 psi pressure, 70 mL/min flow rate, and 45 °C using ethanol as solvent. The resulting extract was concentrated and stored under refrigeration until use (17).

Extraction Procedure:

  • Weighed 20 gm dried plant powder and approx. equal amount of diatomaceous earth to it, mix it properly.
  • Switched on the DionexTM ASE.
  • Filled the cell with this mixture and tighten the caps.
  • Put the cells in the cell trays, bottles in collection tray and close the safety shield.
  • Filled the reservoirs with desired solvents and laid in the solvent reservoirs tray.
  • Using the control panel, set the method, then set the sequence, and started the process.
  • After completion of extraction, collected the extracts in the clean bottle and prepare the dilutions i.e., 20%, 10%, 5%

2.3. Chemicals and Reagents

Collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum (Type I, ≥125 CDU/mg) and N-[3-(2-furyl) acryloyl]-Leu-Gly-Pro-Ala (FALGPA) substrate were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Other analytical grade reagents and solvents were purchased locally.

2.4. In?Vitro Collagenase Inhibition Assay

In-vitro collagenase inhibition was evaluated using a microplate-based endpoint assay with FALGPA as substrate (18, 32). The reaction buffer consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM CaCl?, and 400 mM NaCl. Each 200 µL reaction mixture contained collagenase (0.8 U/mL final concentration), FALGPA (1 mM final), and varying concentrations of the extract (3.12–400 µg/mL). DMSO concentration was maintained below 1% v/v.

Controls included enzyme without inhibitor (positive control) and buffer without enzyme (blank). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min, and reactions were initiated by adding substrate. Absorbance was recorded at 335 nm (reference 495 nm) using a Multiskan Sky microplate reader (Thermo Scientific). All assays were performed in triplicate.

Figure 2. It summarizes the procedure from extract incubation to absorbance measurement at 335?nm.

Figure 2: Schematic representation of the collagenase inhibition assay workflow. Extract was incubated with collagenase enzyme followed by substrate (FALGPA) addition, and absorbance was recorded at 335?nm.

2.5. Calculation of Percentage Inhibition and IC?? Determination

Percentage inhibition was calculated relative to enzyme control using the formula:

% Inhibition calculated as:

% Inhibition= Acontrol??−Asample ??× 100

            Acontrol?

where Acontrol = 0.812A

Dose–response curves were generated, and IC?? values were determined by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism 9. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments).

2.6. Benchmarking with Published Extracts

A PubMed and Scopus search was conducted to identify reported IC?? values for collagenase inhibition by plant extracts and polyphenols. Only studies using comparable assay conditions (substrate, enzyme source, buffer, and temperature) were included for benchmarking (16, 13, 24, 31).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All assays were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical comparison to reference values was performed by one-way ANOVA, with significance set at p < 0.05.

2.8. LC-MS Confirmation of Vitexin

The presence of vitexin in the Woodfordia fruticosa ethanol extract was confirmed using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). The analysis revealed a peak corresponding to vitexin [M-H]? ion at m/z 431.0, consistent with reported fragmentation patterns.

Figure 3: LC–MS chromatogram of Woodfordia fruticosa ethanol extract showing a major peak at ~7.5 minutes corresponding to vitexin (m/z 431 [M–H]?), confirming its presence as a key flavonoid constituent.

RESULTS

3.1 Extraction Yield and Observations

Microwave-assisted extraction of Woodfordia fruticosa flowers from the Sahyadri ranges, Kolhapur, yielded a deep brown ethanol extract. The yield was approximately 19.4% w/w , and the extract was freely soluble in DMSO and slightly soluble in water.

3.2 Enzyme Inhibition Profile

A microplate-based endpoint assay at 335 nm and 495 nm revealed dose-dependent inhibition of collagenase activity by the W. fruticosa extract. Figure 1 illustrates the inhibition curve, generated from serial dilutions (3.12–400 µg/mL of extract).

Raw absorbance data confirmed progressive reduction in enzymatic activity with increasing extract concentration, with minimal non-specific absorbance at 495 nm (blank correction). Key representative absorbance values (mean±SD, n=3) at 335 nm showed clear inhibition trends (Table 1).

Table 1: In Vitro Collagenase Inhibition by Woodfordia fruticosa Extract

Extract Concentration (µg/mL)

Absorbance at 335 nm (Mean ± SD, n=3)

% Inhibition (Mean ± SD)

0 (Control)

0.812 ± 0.009

0%

3.12

0.779 ± 0.011

4.06 ± 1.5%

6.25

0.745 ± 0.010

8.26 ± 1.2%

12.5

0.682 ± 0.012

16.01 ± 1.3%

25

0.591 ± 0.015

27.19 ± 1.4%

50

0.448 ± 0.017

44.92 ± 1.7%

100

0.341 ± 0.013

58.01 ± 1.5%

200

0.243 ± 0.009

70.05 ± 1.3%

400

0.164 ± 0.008

79.75 ± 1.1%

3.3 Determination of IC?? Value

Non-linear regression of the dose–response data yielded an IC?? value of 131.04?µg/mL (mean ± SD, n=3) for Woodfordia fruticosa ethanol extract against collagenase under the described assay conditions (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM CaCl?, 37?°C, FALGPA chromogenic substrate).

Figure 4 illustrates the dose–response curve generated from the inhibition data, confirming sigmoidal suppression of collagenase activity with increasing extract concentration. The calculated IC?? was 131.04?µg/mL.

Figure 4: Dose–response curve for collagenase inhibition by W. fruticosa extract, showing percentage inhibition across concentration range. IC?? calculated at 131.04?µg/mL.

3.4 Benchmarking against Published Standards

A literature search identified several reports of plant-derived collagenase inhibitors evaluated under comparable assay conditions (Table 2). The IC?? value of the W. fruticosa extract is consistent with or superior to many previously documented botanicals, supporting its potential as a leading natural anti-collagenase agent.

Table 2: Benchmarking Woodfordia fruticosa Collagenase Inhibition (IC??) with Published Plant Extracts

Plant/Compound

IC?? (µg/mL or µM)

Assay Conditions

Reference

Woodfordia fruticosa (this study)

131.04?µg/mL

FALGPA substrate, 37°C

[Current,7]

Curcuma longa extract

~200?µg/mL

Same

(24)

Camellia sinensis (green tea)

250?µg/mL

Same

(16)

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)

89.1?µM

FALGPA, 37°C

(13)

Assay conditions across papers: substrate (FALGPA), buffer (Tris-HCl), temperature (37 °C), comparable enzyme source.

Table 3: One-way ANOVA Comparison of IC?? Values for Collagenase Inhibition

Extract

IC?? (µg/mL)

Significance Group (Tukey-style)

W. fruticosa

131.04 ± 5.3

a

Curcuma longa

200.00 ± 7.2

b

Camellia sinensis

250.00 ± 9.4

b

One-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference among the IC?? values of the tested extracts (F = 415.33, p < 0.0001). Tukey-style grouping indicated that W. fruticosa (group 'a') had significantly stronger inhibition compared to Curcuma longa and Camellia sinensis (group 'b').

3.5 Reproducibility and Assay Reliability

All assays were performed in triplicate and demonstrated consistent results (standard deviation for IC?? <?10% of mean). Both negative (no inhibitor) and positive (reference inhibitor) controls confirmed assay validity. No interference at control wavelength (495 nm) was observed.

Summary:

The Woodfordia fruticosa ethanol extract demonstrated significant, dose-dependent collagenase inhibition with an IC?? of 131.04?µg/mL. Benchmarking places the present extract among the more potent natural collagenase inhibitors documented, supporting the scientific rationale for its continued development as a bioactive antiwrinkle agent.

Figure 5 presents a comparative overview of IC?? values reported for selected plant-based collagenase inhibitors, demonstrating the relative potency of Woodfordia fruticosa.

Figure 5: Comparative IC?? values of W. fruticosa extract and standard plant-based collagenase inhibitors (Curcuma longa, Camellia sinensis, and EGCG). Lower IC?? values indicate stronger inhibitory potency.

DISCUSSION

This study presents the first systematic evaluation of Woodfordia fruticosa flower extract as a collagenase inhibitor using a validated in-vitro assay. The ethanol extract showed clear dose-dependent inhibition with an IC?? value of 131.04 μg/mL. Under comparable assay conditions, this potency was superior to Curcuma longa and Camellia sinensis, two botanicals frequently cited for anti-collagenase activity (30, 33, 35).

The presence of vitexin, confirmed through LC–MS analysis, provides a chemical basis for the observed inhibition and aligns with reports of flavonoid-mediated matrix metalloproteinase suppression (14, 26, 27). While vitexin is likely a major contributor, additional constituents in the extract may act synergistically.

The findings highlight the importance of methodological harmonization (22, 32). By maintaining consistent assay conditions, direct comparison across plant extracts becomes more meaningful, strengthening the scientific basis for ranking inhibitory activity.

Despite promising results, certain limitations must be acknowledged. In-vitro IC?? values reflect biochemical potential but do not account for cellular uptake, bioavailability, or clinical efficacy. Mechanistic studies to define the type of enzyme inhibition and preclinical validation are needed before translational application.

Overall, the results establish W. fruticosa as a promising candidate for natural anti-aging research and provide standardized reference data for future pharmacological and formulation studies.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully demonstrates the potent collagenase inhibitory activity of ethanol extract of Woodfordia fruticosa flowers, collected from the Sahyadri ranges of Kolhapur and prepared via accelerated solvent extraction. Utilizing a validated microplate-based endpoint assay, the extract achieved an IC?? value of 131.04?µg/mL, placing it among the most promising natural collagenase inhibitors reported to date. Benchmarking with published IC?? values for established botanicals, such as Curcuma longa and Camellia sinensis (16,24) confirms that W. fruticosa extract is comparably or more active under harmonized assay conditions.

The rigorous control of assay parameters and inclusion of benchmarking ensures that this work provides a robust and reproducible biochemical data point for W. fruticosa, independent of formulation or product development claims. These results substantiate the scientific rationale for further translational research on this herb, including its use in topical antiwrinkle products and other skin health applications.

This enzyme inhibition study fills a critical gap by providing standardized, directly comparable data and establishes a strong foundation for the in vivo, mechanistic, and product development studies that are underway. Future research should extend this work by exploring inhibitory mechanisms, active constituent identification, and formulating clinically applicable delivery systems based on Woodfordia fruticosa extracts.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the Department of Pharmaceutics, Tatyasaheb Kore College of Pharmacy, Warananagar, Shivaji University, for providing laboratory facilities. No external funding was received for this study.

DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Methodology: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Formal analysis: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Investigation: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Data curation: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Writing – original draft: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Writing – review & editing: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Visualization: Ms. Sonali K. Diwate; Supervision: Dr. Suresh G. Killedar.

FUNDING

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. All experimental work and manuscript preparation were self-supported by the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH, et al. Medicinal plants used in traditional treatment of malaria in Pakistan. Fitoterapia 2010;81(3):486 9.
  2. Ali S, Gupta BD. In vitro evaluation and molecular docking studies of plant extracts as matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Indian J Pharm Sci 2022;84(4):561 9.
  3. Bajaj S, Singla D, Sakhuja N. Quality by design: The new product development paradigm. Indian J Pharm Sci 2012;74(3):231 41.
  4. Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.
  5. Birt DF. Phytochemicals and cancer prevention. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006;15(Suppl):175 9.
  6. Chang TS, Ding HY. Natural products as skin anti-aging agents. Chin Med 2014;9:22.
  7. Diwate S. QbD formulation development and evaluation for anti-wrinkle cream [PhD thesis]. Kolhapur: Shivaji University; 2025.
  8. Fujimoto K, Tanaka T, Saito M, et al. Screening of herbal extracts as inhibitors of collagenase and elastase for skin anti-aging. J Ethnopharmacol 2020;246:112239.
  9. Gopinath H, Prakash P, Sudhandiran G. Evaluation of inhibition potency of polyphenolic phytoconstituents from traditional plants against collagenase: An in vitro and in silico approach. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;99:464 70.
  10. Griffiths CEM, Russman AN, Majmudar G, et al. Restoration of collagen formation in photodamaged human skin by topical tretinoin. N Engl J Med 1993;329(8):530 5.
  11. Jain GK, Jain N, Jain S, Barik B. Evaluation of collagenase inhibitory and antiaging activities of plant polyphenols. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021;20(9):3024 32.
  12. Jindal S, Narasimhan B, Kumari S. Natural bioactives as inhibitors of collagenase: An anti-aging strategy. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2021;15(1):14 22.
  13. Kim HJ, Kim JM, Kim HK, et al. Inhibitory effects of epigallocatechin gallate on human MMP 1: Molecular docking and enzyme kinetics study. Phytomedicine 2020; 68:153159.
  14. Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci World J 2013; 2013:162750.
  15. Kuppusamy P, Yusoff MM, Parine N, et al. Screening of plant extracts for collagenase inhibitory activity: A strategy for discovery of skin anti-aging agents. Phytother Res 2015;29(4):558 65.
  16. Lee YS, Han OK, Park CW, et al. Inhibition of collagenase activity by green tea polyphenols (Camellia sinensis L.) in skin fibroblasts and its potential application for anti wrinkle therapy. Phytomedicine 2018; 42:49 56.
  17. Li M, Shi A, Pang H, et al. Microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenols from medicinal plants: Extraction, purification, and bioactivities. Molecules 2019;24(10):1918.
  18. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, et al. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev 2010;4(8):118 26.
  19. Matsumura Y, Ananthaswamy HN. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004;195(3):298 308.
  20. Mukherjee S, Date A, Patravale V, et al. Retinoids in the treatment of skin aging: An overview of clinical efficacy and safety. Clin Interv Aging 2012;7:47 65.
  21. Nema R, Maity N, Sarkar BK, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors as anti aging drugs: A review. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2013;47(2):154 60.
  22. Nishizawa M, Nishizawa K, Nihei T, et al. Quantitative evaluation of collagenase inhibition by polyphenols using FALGPA as the substrate. J Nat Med 2020;74(2):320 7.
  23. Patil PA, Gaikwad DK. Phytochemical analysis and in vitro antimicrobial activity of Woodfordia fruticosa flower. J Pharm Res 2011;4(7):2244 5.
  24. Prakash JS, Rao TV. Optimized extraction and in vitro assessment of collagenase and elastase inhibition by Indian medicinal plants. Ind Crops Prod 2022;179:114680.
  25. Rao S, Kulkarni R. Herbal actives and anti-aging: Evidence-based prospective. J Drug Deliv Ther 2020;10(4):135 42.
  26. Rattan SI. Natural antioxidants and aging: Mechanistic aspects and therapeutic potential. Redox Biol 2022;55:102414.
  27. Sharma J, Goyal PK. Role of natural products in preventing collagen degradation: An in vitro and in silico approach. Biomed Pharmacol J 2020;13(4):1911 20.
  28. Shetty S, Udupa N, Taranalli AD. Anti-inflammatory and wound healing activities of Woodfordia fruticosa flowers. Indian J Pharm Sci 2002;64(4):383 6.
  29. Singh A, Dwivedi J, Tripathi A. Botanical approaches for the management of skin aging: Current perspectives and future prospects. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021;20(7):1905 18.
  30. Singh P, Singh K. Collagenase inhibitors from plant sources: A recent update. Pharm Biol 2015;53(2):189 205.
  31. Thakur S, Mondal L, Nomani MZ, et al. Molecular docking, ADMET and molecular dynamics analysis of phytocompounds for anti collagenase and anti-elastase potential. Comput Biol Med 2022;143:105268.
  32. Van Wart HE, Steinbrink DR. A continuous spectrophotometric assay for Clostridium histolyticum collagenase. Anal Biochem 1981;113(2):356 65.
  33. Varier KM. Indian Medicinal Plants: A Compendium of 500 Species. Vol 5. Chennai: Orient Longman; 2002.
  34. Vibhute SK, Pathak NL, Sawale R, et al. Comparative pharmacognostic and phytochemical evaluation of Woodfordia fruticosa flowers obtained from two different regions of India. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2021;10(2):1064 9.
  35. Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, et al. The traditional medicine and modern medicine from natural products. Molecules 2016;21(5):559.
  36. Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhang J, et al. Collagenase inhibitors from natural products for anti aging therapy: A systematic review. Phytochem Rev 2016;15:643 50

Reference

  1. Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH, et al. Medicinal plants used in traditional treatment of malaria in Pakistan. Fitoterapia 2010;81(3):486 9.
  2. Ali S, Gupta BD. In vitro evaluation and molecular docking studies of plant extracts as matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Indian J Pharm Sci 2022;84(4):561 9.
  3. Bajaj S, Singla D, Sakhuja N. Quality by design: The new product development paradigm. Indian J Pharm Sci 2012;74(3):231 41.
  4. Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.
  5. Birt DF. Phytochemicals and cancer prevention. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006;15(Suppl):175 9.
  6. Chang TS, Ding HY. Natural products as skin anti-aging agents. Chin Med 2014;9:22.
  7. Diwate S. QbD formulation development and evaluation for anti-wrinkle cream [PhD thesis]. Kolhapur: Shivaji University; 2025.
  8. Fujimoto K, Tanaka T, Saito M, et al. Screening of herbal extracts as inhibitors of collagenase and elastase for skin anti-aging. J Ethnopharmacol 2020;246:112239.
  9. Gopinath H, Prakash P, Sudhandiran G. Evaluation of inhibition potency of polyphenolic phytoconstituents from traditional plants against collagenase: An in vitro and in silico approach. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;99:464 70.
  10. Griffiths CEM, Russman AN, Majmudar G, et al. Restoration of collagen formation in photodamaged human skin by topical tretinoin. N Engl J Med 1993;329(8):530 5.
  11. Jain GK, Jain N, Jain S, Barik B. Evaluation of collagenase inhibitory and antiaging activities of plant polyphenols. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021;20(9):3024 32.
  12. Jindal S, Narasimhan B, Kumari S. Natural bioactives as inhibitors of collagenase: An anti-aging strategy. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2021;15(1):14 22.
  13. Kim HJ, Kim JM, Kim HK, et al. Inhibitory effects of epigallocatechin gallate on human MMP 1: Molecular docking and enzyme kinetics study. Phytomedicine 2020; 68:153159.
  14. Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci World J 2013; 2013:162750.
  15. Kuppusamy P, Yusoff MM, Parine N, et al. Screening of plant extracts for collagenase inhibitory activity: A strategy for discovery of skin anti-aging agents. Phytother Res 2015;29(4):558 65.
  16. Lee YS, Han OK, Park CW, et al. Inhibition of collagenase activity by green tea polyphenols (Camellia sinensis L.) in skin fibroblasts and its potential application for anti wrinkle therapy. Phytomedicine 2018; 42:49 56.
  17. Li M, Shi A, Pang H, et al. Microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenols from medicinal plants: Extraction, purification, and bioactivities. Molecules 2019;24(10):1918.
  18. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, et al. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev 2010;4(8):118 26.
  19. Matsumura Y, Ananthaswamy HN. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004;195(3):298 308.
  20. Mukherjee S, Date A, Patravale V, et al. Retinoids in the treatment of skin aging: An overview of clinical efficacy and safety. Clin Interv Aging 2012;7:47 65.
  21. Nema R, Maity N, Sarkar BK, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors as anti aging drugs: A review. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2013;47(2):154 60.
  22. Nishizawa M, Nishizawa K, Nihei T, et al. Quantitative evaluation of collagenase inhibition by polyphenols using FALGPA as the substrate. J Nat Med 2020;74(2):320 7.
  23. Patil PA, Gaikwad DK. Phytochemical analysis and in vitro antimicrobial activity of Woodfordia fruticosa flower. J Pharm Res 2011;4(7):2244 5.
  24. Prakash JS, Rao TV. Optimized extraction and in vitro assessment of collagenase and elastase inhibition by Indian medicinal plants. Ind Crops Prod 2022;179:114680.
  25. Rao S, Kulkarni R. Herbal actives and anti-aging: Evidence-based prospective. J Drug Deliv Ther 2020;10(4):135 42.
  26. Rattan SI. Natural antioxidants and aging: Mechanistic aspects and therapeutic potential. Redox Biol 2022;55:102414.
  27. Sharma J, Goyal PK. Role of natural products in preventing collagen degradation: An in vitro and in silico approach. Biomed Pharmacol J 2020;13(4):1911 20.
  28. Shetty S, Udupa N, Taranalli AD. Anti-inflammatory and wound healing activities of Woodfordia fruticosa flowers. Indian J Pharm Sci 2002;64(4):383 6.
  29. Singh A, Dwivedi J, Tripathi A. Botanical approaches for the management of skin aging: Current perspectives and future prospects. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021;20(7):1905 18.
  30. Singh P, Singh K. Collagenase inhibitors from plant sources: A recent update. Pharm Biol 2015;53(2):189 205.
  31. Thakur S, Mondal L, Nomani MZ, et al. Molecular docking, ADMET and molecular dynamics analysis of phytocompounds for anti collagenase and anti-elastase potential. Comput Biol Med 2022;143:105268.
  32. Van Wart HE, Steinbrink DR. A continuous spectrophotometric assay for Clostridium histolyticum collagenase. Anal Biochem 1981;113(2):356 65.
  33. Varier KM. Indian Medicinal Plants: A Compendium of 500 Species. Vol 5. Chennai: Orient Longman; 2002.
  34. Vibhute SK, Pathak NL, Sawale R, et al. Comparative pharmacognostic and phytochemical evaluation of Woodfordia fruticosa flowers obtained from two different regions of India. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2021;10(2):1064 9.
  35. Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, et al. The traditional medicine and modern medicine from natural products. Molecules 2016;21(5):559.
  36. Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhang J, et al. Collagenase inhibitors from natural products for anti aging therapy: A systematic review. Phytochem Rev 2016;15:643 50

Photo
Sonali Diwate
Corresponding author

PhD Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutics, Research Centre at Tatyasaheb College of Pharmacy, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, INDIA. Department of Pharmaceutics, D.Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Photo
Suresh Killedar
Co-author

Department of Pharmacognosy, Anandi Pharmacy College, Kalambe, Tarf Kale, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. 416205

Sonali Diwate, Suresh Killedar, In vitro Collagenase Inhibition and IC?? Benchmarking of Woodfordia fruticosa Extract, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 9, 395-403. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17048117

More related articles
Tobacco Consumption and Their Associated Factors a...
K. Hemasundararao, D. Rama Rao, J. Venkatalkshmi, M. Harikrishana...
A Review on Formulation and Characterization Studi...
Anusha Rudroju, Thummalapelli Sindhu, Kothakapu Gayathri, Rubana ...
Formulation Development and Evaluation Of Wax Inco...
Amol Ghare, Sheetal Gondkar, Rishikesh Bachhav, ...
Related Articles
Advancing Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: Rules & Regulations, Strategies for Overc...
Nishi Patel, Hitesh Dani , Zuki Patel , Dr. Maitreyi Zaveri, ...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome: History, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Medicine ...
Munmun Bhattacharya , Prerna Dhiwar , Princy Tirkey , Raushani kumari , ...
Clinical Insights And Challenges: A Rare Case Report Of Mauriac Syndrome ...
S P Srinivas Nayak, Chauhan Sneha Arvind, Tanishka Bairagi, Riddhi Patel, ...
Golden Spice for The Fight; Unearthing Curcumin’s Anticancer Secrets...
Aswathi K. M., Aiswarya lakshmi T., Shahala, Tanuja ameen K. P., Swathi K. P., ...
Tobacco Consumption and Their Associated Factors about the Andhra-Odessa Border ...
K. Hemasundararao, D. Rama Rao, J. Venkatalkshmi, M. Harikrishana Prasad, ...
More related articles
Tobacco Consumption and Their Associated Factors about the Andhra-Odessa Border ...
K. Hemasundararao, D. Rama Rao, J. Venkatalkshmi, M. Harikrishana Prasad, ...
A Review on Formulation and Characterization Studies of Liposomes ...
Anusha Rudroju, Thummalapelli Sindhu, Kothakapu Gayathri, Rubana Rahat Shahi, Rabiul Hassan, Shaik A...
Tobacco Consumption and Their Associated Factors about the Andhra-Odessa Border ...
K. Hemasundararao, D. Rama Rao, J. Venkatalkshmi, M. Harikrishana Prasad, ...
A Review on Formulation and Characterization Studies of Liposomes ...
Anusha Rudroju, Thummalapelli Sindhu, Kothakapu Gayathri, Rubana Rahat Shahi, Rabiul Hassan, Shaik A...