View Article

Abstract

Tablets remain one of the most widely used dosage forms in the pharmaceutical industry due to their ease of administration, stability, and cost-effectiveness. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the key aspects of tablet formulation, including the selection of excipients, the role of binders, fillers, disintegrants, and lubricants, and the processes involved in tablet manufacturing. The paper discusses the critical manufacturing steps, such as granulation, compression, and coating, while emphasizing the importance of controlling critical quality attributes like hardness, friability, dissolution, and uniformity. Challenges faced in tablet production, including issues of stability, bioavailability, and scale-up, are also addressed. Furthermore, the review highlights recent advancements in tablet technology, such as the development of novel formulations and the integration of automation and quality control measures. This comprehensive overview serves as a valuable resource for both researchers and industry professionals involved in the development and optimization of tablet dosage forms

Keywords

Tablet, Excipients in Tablets, Tablet Manufacturing, Granulation Process, Compression, Disintegration and Dissolution, Hardness and Friability, Binders and Lubricants in Tablets.

Introduction

Sustained release pharmaceuticals have emerged as a highly valuable tool in medical practice, offering patients a wide range of real and perceived benefits. Sustained release systems are also seen as a promising approach to minimizing medication side effects by maintaining a consistent therapeutic concentration of the drug in the body, preventing fluctuations. Traditional dosage forms of drugs are gradually being replaced by advanced and innovative drug delivery systems that offer improved therapeutic outcomes. In modern therapeutics, controlled release and sustained release dosage forms have gained immense popularity. Traditional dosage forms of drugs are gradually being replaced by advanced and innovative drug delivery systems that offer improved therapeutic outcomes. In modern therapeutics, controlled release and sustained release dosage forms have gained immense popularity. A matrix system is a type of drug delivery method designed to extend and control the release of a drug that is either dissolved or evenly distributed within the matrix material [1]. Among various routes of drug administration, the oral route remains the most commonly preferred due to its convenience, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, making it the least e expensive option. Oral drug delivery is the most commonly used method for administering medicines, compared to other available routes for systemic drug delivery. It involves the use of various pharmaceutical products in different dosage forms. The main aim of drug delivery is to maintain a stable concentration of the drug in the systemic circulation which is both effective and safe for a prolonged period [2]. To achieve this, different dosage forms such as sustained release, prolonged release, controlled release, and timed release systems have been developed. These systems are specially designed to provide a continuous release of the drug over an extended period from a single dose. In the case of oral sustained-release formulations, the drug effect lasts for several hours depending on how long the drug stays in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [3].

Advantages: [4,5,6]                                                                                                                                

  1. Reduced local and systemic side effects, particularly minimizing gastrointestinal irritation.
  2. Enhanced drug utilization - lower overall drug consumption with minimal drug build-up              during long-term use.
  3. Increased effectiveness in therapeutic management.
  4. Ensures optimal therapeutic outcomes.
  5. Maintains consistent drug levels in the body, leading to a more stable pharmacological response.
  6. Provides specific therapeutic effects for instance, sustained-release aspirin delivers adequate drug concentration upon waking to relieve arthritis symptoms.
  7. Facilitates faster or cure of medical conditions.

Disadvantages: [7]

  1. Sustained release formulations may show lower systemic availability when compared to immediate release conventional dosage forms.
  2. There is often a weak correlation between laboratory test results (in vitro) and actual drug behavior in the body (in vivo).
  3. In case of toxicity, overdose, or hypersensitivity reactions, recovering the drug from the body is difficult once administered.
  4. Drugs that typically require dose adjustments based on patient needs may not be suitable for sustained release forms, as they are usually administered in fixed strengths.

Classification of Tablets: [8]

Depending on the route of administration or the function, the tablets are broadly classified as follows:

    1. Tablets ingested orally:
      1. Compressed tablet
      2. Multiple compressed tablet
  1. Layered Tablet

ii) Compression coated Tablet

      1. Repeat action Tablet
      2. Enteric coated and delayed action Tablet
      3. Sugar coated tablet
      4. Film coated tablet
      5. Chewable Tablet
    1. Tablets used in the oral cavity:
      1. Buccal Tablet
      2. Sublingual Tablet
      3. Troches and Lozenges
      4. Dental cones
    2. Tablets administered by other routes:
      1. Implantation Tablet
      2. Vaginal Tablets
    3. Tablets used to prepare solution:
      1. Effervescent Tablet
      2. Dispensing Tablet
      3. Hypodermic Tablet
      4. Tablets Triturates

Classification of sustained release drug delivery [9, 10]

Controlled release systems for oral administration are primarily solid dosage forms, with drug release regulated by dissolution, diffusion, or a combination of both mechanisms. Depending on the method of drug release, these systems are categorized as follows:

1. System of continuous release

2. Mechanisms of delayed transit and continuous release

3. Systems with a delayed release   

1. Continuous release systems:

Continuous release systems provide sustained drug release throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract as the dosage form follows its normal transit path. The following are the different systems that fall into this category:

  a. Diffusion controlled release systems

  b. Dissolution controlled release systems

  c. Diffusion and dissolution-controlled release systems

  d. Ion exchange resin- drug complexes

  e. pH-independent formulation

  f. Osmotic pressure-controlled systems.

a. Diffusion controlled release systems:

The rate-limiting step in these systems is the diffusion of dissolved drug through a polymeric barrier. Since the diffusion path length increases over time as the insoluble matrix is steadily depleted of drug, the drug release rate is never zero-order. The regulated drug delivery systems are based on the diffusion of a drug molecule through a polymeric membrane.

b. Dissolution-controlled release systems:

Dissolution-controlled release is accomplished by reducing the drug’s dissolution rate in the GI fluids. This can be done by embedding the drug in an insoluble polymer or by coating drug particles or granules with polymer layers of varying thickness. The rate-limiting step in this process is the drug’s diffusion across the aqueous boundary layer. The drug’s solubility acts as the driving force for its release, which is resisted by the stagnant diffusion layer of fluid surrounding it. The equation below provides an approximation for the dissolution rate (dm/dt) :

dm/dt = ADS/h………….(1)

Where,

A = Tablet’s surface area

D = Diffusivity of the drug

S = Aqueous solubility of the drug

h = Thickness of the boundary layer

The two types of dissolution-controlled release are:

  • Matrix  dissolution-controlled systems                                                                       

The medication is suspended in an insoluble matrix of swell-able hydrophobic or hydrophilic materials.

  • Reservoir dissolution-controlled systems                                                                                       
  • This mechanism is hollow, with an inner drug core encased in a water -insoluble polymer membrane.

c. Dissolution and Diffusion Controlled release System

The API is enclosed in a partially soluble membrane of polymer. Pores are formed when sections of the membrane dissolve, allowing aqueous medium into the centre and thus drug dissolution, as well as the diffusion of dissolved drug out of the system.

d. Ion exchange resin-drug complexes:

It involves the creation of a drug-resin complex, which forms when an ionic solution interacts with ionic resins.  The drug in this complex is exchanged in the gastrointestinal tract and released when there is an excess of Na+ and Cl present in most cases, an insoluble cross linked polymer resin is used in this system. They have a salt forming function group in a polymer chain that repeats.

e. pH-independent formulation:

Most drugs are weak acids or bases, which means their release from sustained-release formulations is influenced by pH. To maintain a stable pH and slow down pH-dependent drug release, a buffer, such as citric acid salt, amino acid, or tartaric acid, can be incorporated into the formulation. By combining a simple or acidic drug with one or more buffering agents, granulating with appropriate excipients, and coating with a gastrointestinal fluid-permeable, film-forming polymer, a buffer-retained release formulation is achieved. As gastrointestinal fluid passes through the membrane, the buffering agent changes the pH of the fluid within, resulting in a steady rate of drug absorption release.

f. Osmotic pressure-controlled systems:

A semipermeable membrane is placed around the tablet, particle, or drug solution to allow water to enter the tablet, with drug solution eventually being pumped out through a small delivery aperture in the tablet centered. There are two types of osmotic pressure-controlled systems: Type 1, which features an osmotic core containing the drug, and Type 2, where the drug is enclosed in a flexible bag, surrounded by an osmotic core. By optimizing the formulation and processing factors, an osmotic system can be developed to deliver a variety of drugs at a predetermined rate.

2. Continuous release and delayed transit systems:                                                                                                                                                                                                       These are developed to keep them in the GI tract for a longer period of time after they have been written. This category encompasses mucoadhesive and size-based systems, which are designed to remain in the stomach and typically contain medications that are stable at gastric pH.

3. Delayed release systems:                                                                                                             Due to the design of these systems, drug release is restricted to a specific location within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The following drugs can be incorporated into such devices.

  • Known to cause gastric distress
  • Destroyed
  • for local effect at a specific GI site
  • Absorbed from a specific intestinal site

The two types of delayed release system are

1) intestinal release systems.

2) colonic release systems.

Ideal properties of sustained release tablet [11,12]

It should be stable in the gastrointestinal fluid and appropriately absorbed orally

  • Drugs that have short half-lives (two to four hours) make great candidates for SR dosage forms .
  • A pharmacological dose of at least 0.5 grams and no more than 1.0 grams is required to create SRDDS.
  • The drugs therapeutic range in sustained – release tablet should be sufficiently broad and high to ensure that variations in release do not lead to concentrations exceeding the minimum toxic thresholds .
  • The tablet should have consistent weight and accuracy.
  • The drug should be evenly distributed throughout the tablet.
  • The size and shape should be suitable for easy administration.
  • The tablet should not be too hard, ensuring it disintegrates properly in the stomach.
  • There should be no incompatibilities present.

Tablet Manufacturing Methods [13,14]

Tablets are manufactured by wet granulation, dry granulation or direct compression method.

Processing steps

  • Wet Granulation
  • Dry Granulation
  • Direct Compression
  1. Wet Granulation

Wet granulation is a process where a liquid is added to a powder in a vessel with agitation, leading to the formation of agglomerates or granules. After drying, these granules are compressed to form tablets                      .

2) Dry Granulation

This technique does not involve the use of liquids. It begins with the formation of slugs, which are then screened or milled to create granules. These granules are subsequently compressed to form tablets.

3) Direct compression

The term direct compression is used to define the process by which tablets are compressed directly from powder blends of active ingredient and suitable excipients, which will flow uniformly in the die cavity & forms a firm.

Fig.: Processing steps required in tablet granulation preparation [13,14]

Steps in Tablet Manufacturing [15,16]

Tablet manufacturing involves several steps to convert raw materials into a finished solid dosage form. The steps ensure the uniformity, stability, and therapeutic effectiveness of the tablets.

1. Weighing and Dispensing

Accurate weighing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and excipients is the first and most critical step to ensure uniformity of the dose.

2. Mixing and Blending

All ingredients are blended uniformly to achieve consistent distribution of the drug throughout the mixture.

3. Granulation

Granulation is done to improve the flow properties and compressibility of the powder blend. It can be done by:

• Wet Granulation

• Dry Granulation

• Direct Compression (without granulation)

4. Drying

Wet granules are dried to remove moisture content and achieve the desired hardness.

5. Sieving

The dried granules are passed through sieves to obtain uniform particle size distribution for better compression.

6. Lubrication

Lubricants, glidants, and anti-adherents are added to enhance the flow properties and prevent sticking during compression.

7. Compression

The final blend or granules are compressed into tablets using a tablet press machine to form tablets of the desired shape, size, and weight.

8. Coating (Optional)

Tablets can be coated to mask taste, control drug release, enhance appearance, or protect the drug from environmental factors.

9. Packaging

The finished tablets are packed in suitable packaging materials like blister packs or bottles to protect them from moisture, light

Sustained Release Tablet

It is defined as any drug or dosage form modification that prolongs the therapeutic activity of drug [17].  In theory, tablets provide the most cost-effective method for achieving sustained and controlled drug release in solid dosage forms. At present, most products are made by placing coated pellets inside capsules. This method of sustained release offers several benefits, such as controlled emptying of particles from the stomach, the ability to apply different types of coatings, and the development of release profiles suited for different drugs. This system allows for an initial release of the drug, followed by a slower, sustained release. However, tablets with a slow-releasing matrix cannot always achieve these characteristics. Therefore, due to consumer expectations (and those of marketing specialists), controlled-release products are mostly available in capsule form. Only a limited number of sustained-release products are available in tablet form [18].

Sustained Release Drug Delivery System:

A sustained-release drug product is a dosage form specifically designed to release a drug at a controlled rate, maintaining a consistent drug concentration in the bloodstream over a defined period of time. Typically, such formulations deliver an initial therapeutic dose, followed by a gradual and sustained release of the drug . These systems offer several advantages, including improved bio availability, ease and convenience of administration, enhanced drug stability, maintenance of steady plasma drug levels, reduced gastrointestinal irritation and side effects, and minimized toxicity. However, sustained-release systems also have certain drawbacks. The release rate can be influenced by various factors such as food intake and gastrointestinal transit time. Additionally, they tend to be more expensive, may lead to drug tolerance or "dose dumping," are subject to extensive first-pass metabolism, and often show poor in vitro–in vivo correlation .[19,20,21,22]

Mechanism of Sustained Release Tablets

Sustained release tablets control the drug release rate through different mechanisms to maintain therapeutic drug levels for an extended period. [23,24,25]

Mechanisms:

  1. Diffusion Controlled System

In this drug diffuses slowly through a polymer membrane or matrix. The rate of drug release depends on the concentration gradient. Diffusion controlled system falls under two categories

  • Reservoir system (coating around the drug core)
  • Matrix system (drug dispersed in polymer matrix)
  1. Dissolution Controlled System
  • The drug release is controlled by the dissolution rate of the drug or coating material.
  • The drug gets slowly dissolve in the GI fluid.
  1. Osmotic Pressure Controlled System

The semipermeable membrane of the tablet allows water to enter inside; the pressure created release the drug

  1. Erosion Controlled System

The tablet matrix gradually erodes in the gastrointestinal tract, releasing the drug. This is ideal for biodegradable polymers.

  1. Ion Exchange Resin System
    • The drug is bound to a resin and released in exchange for ions present in gastrointestinal fluids.
    • Release depends on pH and electrolyte concentration.                                                                                         

Advantage tablet of Sustained release [26]

      1. Patient compliance by low frequency increases of dossing  patient Compliance
      2. Therapeutic efficacy increases by dossing.
      3. Once a  day therapy decreases dose missing
      4. Excellent accessibility

Classification of sustained release tablet [27]

  1. Continuous release system

1)Diffusion controlled release system

2)Dissolution controlled release system

3)Dissolution and diffusion controlled  release system

4)Ion exchange resin drug complexes

5)pH – independent formulation

6)Osmatic pressure controlled system

  1. Delayed transit and  controlled release system
  2. Delayed release system

Significance of sustained release tablets

Sustained release tablet play a vital role in modern drug delivery systems by offering several therapeutic advantages over conventional dosage form. The primary significance lies in their ability to maintain a consistent concentration of the the drug in the bloodstream over an extended period, reducing the frequency of drug administration. This ensures better patient compliance and convenience, particularly for chronic diseases that require long-term treatment. Moreover, sustained-release tablets help minimizes fluctuations in plasma drug levels, reducing the risk of side effects and toxicity linked to peak drug concentrations. These systems also enhance the therapeutic efficacy of drug by providing controlled and prolonged action at the target site.  Furthermore, sustained release formulations reduce the overall cost of treatment by lowering the number of doses required and improving the efficiency of the drug molecule. This approach is especially beneficial for drugs with short biological half-lives, as it prolongs their activity and provides better management of disease conditions [28,29,30]

Tablet ingredients:

Besides the active ingredients, the tablet also contains various inert substances known as additives or excipients. Different excipients are:

      1. Diluent
      2. Binder and adhesive
      3. Disintegrate
      4. Lubricants and glidants
      5. Colouring agents
      6. Flavoring agents
      7. Sweetening agents
      8. Polymers

Table No. 1: Tablet ingredients with examples

Sr No.

Ingredients

Example

1

Diluents[31]

calcium Phosphate; Carboxymethylcellulose Calcium; Cellulose;

Dextrin; Lactose; Microcrystalline Cellulose; PR gelatinized

Starch; Sorbitol; Starch

2

Binders[31]

Acacia; Alginic Acid; Carboxymethylcellulose; Cellulose; Dextrin;

Gelatin; Liquid Glucose; Magnesium Aluminum Silicate;

Maltodextrin; Methylcellulose; Povidone; Sodium Alginate; Starch;

Zein.

3

Lubricants[32]

Calcium Stearate; Glyceryl Palmitostearate; Magnesium Oxide;

Poloxamer; Polyvinyl Alcohol; Sodium Benzoate; Sodium Lauryl

Sulfate; Sodium Stearyl Sulfate; Stearic Acid; Talc; Zinc Stearate

4

Glidants[31,32]

Magnesium Trisilicate; Cellulose; Starch; Talc; Tribasic Calcium

Phosphate

5

Anti – adherents[33]

Corn Starch; Metallic Stearate; Talc

6

Disintegrants[33,34]

Alginic Acid; Carboxymethylcellulose; Cellulose; Colloidal Silicon

Dioxide; Croscarmellose Sodium; Croscarmellose; Potassium Polacrilin ; Povidone

7

Coloring agents[34]

FD&C or D&C Dyes or Lake Pigments

8

Flavoring agents[35]

Ethyl Maltol; Ethyl Vanillin; Menthol; Vanillin

9

Absorbents[35]

Kaolin; Magnesium Aluminum Silicate; Tricalcium Phosphate

10

Polymaers[36]

Poly vinyl Pyrrolidone (Pup): Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA): Polyethylene Glycol (PEG);

Polylactic Acid (PLA); Polyglycolic Acid (PGA): Polycapprolactone (PCL);

Polydioxanone suture (PDS);

Polyetherurethane (PEU): cellulose Acetate (CA): Ethyl cellulose (EC); Polyvinyl chloride (PUC); Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate

(PHEMA); Guar Gum : Gum Arabic Tragacanth

 
  1. Diluent:

Diluentare fillers used to make required bulk of the tablet when the drug dosage itself is inadequate to produce the bulk. Secondary reason is to provide better tablet properties such as improve cohesion, to permit use of direct compression manufacturing or to promote flow [31].

A diluent should have following properties:

  • It must be non toxic
  • It must be commercially available in acceptable grade
  • Its  cost must be low
  • It must be physiologically inert
  • It must be physically & chemically stable by themselves & in combination with the drugs.
  • It must be free from all microbial contamination.
  • It must not alter the bio availability of drug.
  • It should be color compatible [31].
  1. Binders:

To form cohesive compacts for directly compressed tablet [31].

  1. Lubricants:

Lubricants are used to prevent tablet materials from sticking to the surfaces of dies and punches, as well as to decrease friction between particles and may improve the rate of flow of the tablet granulation [32].

  1. Glidants:

Glidants are intended to promote flow of granules or powder material by reducing the friction between the particles [31,32].

  1. Anti–adherents:

Anti-adherents are added to the tablet formulations to prevent the material from sticking to the walls of the tablet press [33].

  1. Disintegrates:

Added to a tablet formulation to facilitate its breaking or disintegration when it contact in water in the GIT [33,34].

  1. Coloring Agents:

The use of colors and dyes in a tablet has three purposes: (A) Masking of off color drugs (B) Product Identification (C) Production of more elegant product [34].

  1. Flavoring Agents:

Flavoring oils are needed for chew-able tablets. The oil is generally added in a dry form such as spray-dried bead-lets [35].

  1. Absorbents:

The inclusion of absorbents in a tablet formulation is necessary if the product contains a substance with a high affinity to water. Hygroscopic materials, if present, render the blend wet and difficult to handle during manufacture [35].

  1. Polymer

Resin a film-forming bio-polymer and its byproducts broadly form used for film coating and micro-encapsulation materials to accomplish sustained drug release [36].

Various types of polymers are -

1.Hydrogels- PHEMA, PUA PVP

2.Soluble polymers- PEG, PVA, PUP

3.Biodegradable Polymers - PLA, PGA, PCL.

4.Non-Biodegradable polymers - PEU, PDS, PUA

5.Muco adhesive Polymer- PUC, EC, CA.

6.Natural Gums - Gum Arabic, Guar gam, Tragacant [36].

Evaluation tests for sustained release matrix tablet [37,38,39,40]

These dosage forms were evaluated in two different methods.

I. Evaluation of granules

II. Evaluation of tablets

I. Evaluation of granules

i. Angle of repose [37].

The funnel technique was used to calculate the angle of repose. A funnel was fixed to a platform at a specified height (h) above horizontally arranged graph paper. The test was spilleduntil the funnel's point reached the summit of the conical bulk. Following measurements of the cone pile's radius and a calculation of its angle of repose

tan(θ) = height/radius of the heap.

ii. Bulk density [37]

The equation was used to establish the bulk density.

 pb = MV

Where, pb = Bulk density, M = Mass of the granules in gm, V = final untapped volume of     granules in ml

iii. Tapped density [37,38]

The tapped density was measured using the equation

pt = M / V  P

Where, p t = true density

M = Mass of granules in gm.

VP =  Final tapped volume of granules in ml

iv. Compressibility index [38]

The capacity of powder to be compacted was evaluated; consequently, the proportional significance of inter-particulate interactions was observed. The compressibility index was calculated by  following equation

Compressibility index= (Dt-Db) x 100

 Where,

     Dt=Tapped density,

     Db=Bulk density

v. Hauser's ratio [38]

It was calculated by the following equation

Hauser's ratio= Dt/Do

Where,

Dt =Tapped density,

Do= Bulk density

II. Evaluation of tablets

  1. Weight variation test [39]

Using an electronic scale, 20 tablets of each formulation were measured to investigate weight variance, and the test was carried out by the recommended procedure.

ii. Friability test [39]

Twenty pills were weighed and included in the Roche friabilator, which was then spun at a speed of 25 revolutions per minute for four minutes. The tablet was weighed and cleaned after the revolt.

% friability= Wo - W/Wo x 100

 Where,

Wo = Initial weight of twenty tablet

W = weight of 20 tablets after 4 minutes

iii. Hardness test [39,40]

Using a Monsanto hardness tester, six tablets were examined for hardness from each batch. An average of six values was recorded along with the standard variation for each batch, as well as the hardness of the individual tablets.

iv. Thickness test [40]

Twenty tablets were randomly selected from the collection, and the thickness of each tablet was measured. Six tablets from each batch were inspected, and the average width and standard deviation values were calculated.

v. In-vitro drug release [40]

 Formulated tablets were put through an in vitro dissolving test using a paddle-style USP type 1/device running at 100 revolutions per minute and maintaining a 37°C water bath. Dissolution was maintained in 900 ccs of simulated stomach fluid for two hours and in simulated intestinal fluid for an additional eight hours. A UV-visible spectrophotometer was used to detect the emission of various medications at specific wavelengths over time.

RESULT & DISCUSSION:

This review highlights the classification, formulation ingredients, and evaluation parameters involved in tablet development. Tablets remain the most preferred oral dosage form due to their stability, ease of administration, accurate dosing, and patient compliance. Various types of tablets, including immediate-release, sustained-release, chewable, effervescent, and orally disintegrating tablets, were discussed in terms of their formulation objectives and functional excipients. The review reveals that the choice of excipients plays a critical role in determining tablet characteristics such as disintegration time, hardness, friability, and dissolution profile. Superdisintegrant, for instance, significantly enhance the disintegration and dissolution rate, improving bioavailability, especially in immediate-release formulations. On the other hand, hydrophilic matrix-forming agents and polymers are essential in sustained-release systems to control the drug release kinetics. Evaluation parameters such as hardness, friability, weight variation, disintegration time, and in vitro drug release are essential for ensuring product quality and consistency.  Overall, the discussion underscores the need for a well-balanced formulation strategy that considers both the physicochemical properties of the drug and the desired release profile. Continued research and innovation in tablet formulation and processing techniques are expected to further enhance the efficacy and patient compliance of oral drug delivery systems.

REFERENCES

  1. Parashar, T., Soniya, Singh, V., Singh, G., Tyagi, S., Patel, C., & Gupta, G. (2013). Novel oral sustained release technology: A concise review. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 2(2), 262–269.
  2. Agarwal, G., Agarwal, S., Kumar, P. K., & Goyal, S. (2017). Oral sustained release tablets: An overview with a special emphasis on matrix tablet. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery, 5(2), 64–76.
  3.   Rout, S., & Kar, D. (2011). A brief review on modified release solid dosage form with special reference to design. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy, 2, 1701–1708. 
  4. Ali, P. R., Pratima, B., Barotaje, N., & Mhalke, S. (2016). Sustained release drug delivery system: A modern formulation approach. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Technology Innovations, 4(17), 108–18
  5. Zaute, H. D., & Saudagar, R. B. (2013). Review on sustained release matrix tablet. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 3(4), 19–23.
  6. Gupta, M. M., & Ray, B. (2012). A review on sustained release technology of Thora Apple. International Journal of Pharmacy, 18–23.
  7. Mandhao, P., & Josni, G. (2025). Development of sustained release drug delivery system: A review. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 2(1), 179–185.
  8. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2021). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed., pp. 293–303). CBS Publishers & Distributors.
  9. Parashar, T., Soniya, S., Singh, V., Singh, G., Tyagi, S., Patel, C., & Gupta, G. (n.d.). Novel oral sustained release technology. [Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page range if available].
  10. Agarwal, G., Agarwal, S., Karar, P. K., & Goyal, S. (2017). Oral sustained release tablets: An overview with a special emphasis on matrix tablet. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery, 5(2), 64–76.
  11. Zalte, H., & Saudagar, R. (2013). Review on sustained release matrix tablet. International Journal of Biosciences, 3(4), 17–29.
  12. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (1990). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
  13. European Pharmacopoeia. (2004). European Pharmacopoeia (5th ed., Vol. 1, p. 628). Council of Europe.
  14. Allen, L. V., Wang, B., & Devices, J. D. (2000). Rapidly dissolving tablets (U.S. Patent No. 6,066,337). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  15. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (1991). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
  16. Aulton, M. E. (2013). Aulton's pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines (4th ed.). Churchill Livingstone.
  17. Sampath, K., Bhowmik, D., & Shrivastava, S. (2012). Sustained release drug delivery system potential. The Pharma Innovation, 1, 48–52.
  18. Lackman, Lieberman’s., Khar. R. K., Vyas. SP., Jain. G. K., (fourth edition) 2013 (454)
  19. Pandey, R., & Sharma, A. (2003). Poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticle-based inhalable sustained drug delivery system for experimental tuberculosis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 52(6), 981–986.
  20. Pandey, A., Nikam, A. N., Mutalik, S. P., Fernandes, G., Shreya, A. B., Padya, B. S., & Raychaudhuri, R. (2021). Architectured Therapeutic and Diagnostic Nanoplatforms for Combating SARS-CoV-2: Role of Inorganic, Organic, and Radioactive Materials. ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 7(1), 31–54. Convert into API
  21. Barahuie, F., Dorniani, D., & Saifullah, B. (2017). Sustained release of anticancer agent phytic acid from its chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles for drug-delivery system. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 12, 2361–2372.
  22. Arjun, S., Ritika, S., & Faraz, J. (n.d.). Sustained release drug delivery system: A review. International Journal of Research Publications, 3(9), 21–24
  23. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (1991). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
  24. Aulton, M. E. (2013). Aulton's pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines (4th ed.). Churchill Livingstone.
  25. Robinson, J. R., & Lee, V. H. L. (1987). Controlled drug delivery: Fundamentals and applications (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker Inc.
  26. Nagoba. S. N., Shafi. S., Ladde. S. S., Essentials of Novel drug delivery system (first edition) January – 2021 (130)
  27. Parashar, T., Singh, V., Singh, G., Tyagi, S., Patel, C., & Gupta, A. (2013). Novel oral sustained release technology: A concise review. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 2, 262–269.
  28. Chien, Y. W. (1992). Novel drug delivery systems (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
  29. Patel, R. P., Patel, M. M., & Patel, N. M. (2011). A review on sustained release drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, 2(12), 147–158.
  30. Brahmankar, D. M., & Jaiswal, S. B. (2015). Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics: A treatise. Vallabh Prakashan.
  31. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. (1987). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed., pp. 293–373). Varghese Publishing House
  32. Lieberman, H. A., Rieger, M. M., & Banker, G. S. (Year). Pharmaceutical dosage forms: Tablets (Vol. 1). [Publisher].
  33. Al-Achi, A. (2019). Tablets: A brief overview. Journal of Pharma Practice and Pharmaceutical Science, 1(1), 49–52.
  34. Nagashree, K. (2015). Solid dosage forms: Tablets. Research and Reviews: Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 4(1), [Page range if known].
  35. Park, K., & Robinson, J. R. (1984). Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery: Method to study bioadhesion. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 19, 107–109.
  36. Chang, H. S. (2018). Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: Synthesis and evaluation of some swelling water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 74(4), 399–402.
  37. Aulton, M. E., & Taylor, K. M. G. (2018). Aulton's Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines (5th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
  38. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy (4th ed.). CBS Publishers & Distributors.
  39. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. (2021). United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 43–NF 38). Rockville, MD: USP.
  40. Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (2009). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients (6th ed.). Pharmaceutical Press.

Reference

  1. Parashar, T., Soniya, Singh, V., Singh, G., Tyagi, S., Patel, C., & Gupta, G. (2013). Novel oral sustained release technology: A concise review. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 2(2), 262–269.
  2. Agarwal, G., Agarwal, S., Kumar, P. K., & Goyal, S. (2017). Oral sustained release tablets: An overview with a special emphasis on matrix tablet. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery, 5(2), 64–76.
  3.   Rout, S., & Kar, D. (2011). A brief review on modified release solid dosage form with special reference to design. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy, 2, 1701–1708. 
  4. Ali, P. R., Pratima, B., Barotaje, N., & Mhalke, S. (2016). Sustained release drug delivery system: A modern formulation approach. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Technology Innovations, 4(17), 108–18
  5. Zaute, H. D., & Saudagar, R. B. (2013). Review on sustained release matrix tablet. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 3(4), 19–23.
  6. Gupta, M. M., & Ray, B. (2012). A review on sustained release technology of Thora Apple. International Journal of Pharmacy, 18–23.
  7. Mandhao, P., & Josni, G. (2025). Development of sustained release drug delivery system: A review. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 2(1), 179–185.
  8. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2021). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed., pp. 293–303). CBS Publishers & Distributors.
  9. Parashar, T., Soniya, S., Singh, V., Singh, G., Tyagi, S., Patel, C., & Gupta, G. (n.d.). Novel oral sustained release technology. [Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page range if available].
  10. Agarwal, G., Agarwal, S., Karar, P. K., & Goyal, S. (2017). Oral sustained release tablets: An overview with a special emphasis on matrix tablet. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery, 5(2), 64–76.
  11. Zalte, H., & Saudagar, R. (2013). Review on sustained release matrix tablet. International Journal of Biosciences, 3(4), 17–29.
  12. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (1990). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
  13. European Pharmacopoeia. (2004). European Pharmacopoeia (5th ed., Vol. 1, p. 628). Council of Europe.
  14. Allen, L. V., Wang, B., & Devices, J. D. (2000). Rapidly dissolving tablets (U.S. Patent No. 6,066,337). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  15. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (1991). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
  16. Aulton, M. E. (2013). Aulton's pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines (4th ed.). Churchill Livingstone.
  17. Sampath, K., Bhowmik, D., & Shrivastava, S. (2012). Sustained release drug delivery system potential. The Pharma Innovation, 1, 48–52.
  18. Lackman, Lieberman’s., Khar. R. K., Vyas. SP., Jain. G. K., (fourth edition) 2013 (454)
  19. Pandey, R., & Sharma, A. (2003). Poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticle-based inhalable sustained drug delivery system for experimental tuberculosis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 52(6), 981–986.
  20. Pandey, A., Nikam, A. N., Mutalik, S. P., Fernandes, G., Shreya, A. B., Padya, B. S., & Raychaudhuri, R. (2021). Architectured Therapeutic and Diagnostic Nanoplatforms for Combating SARS-CoV-2: Role of Inorganic, Organic, and Radioactive Materials. ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 7(1), 31–54. Convert into API
  21. Barahuie, F., Dorniani, D., & Saifullah, B. (2017). Sustained release of anticancer agent phytic acid from its chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles for drug-delivery system. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 12, 2361–2372.
  22. Arjun, S., Ritika, S., & Faraz, J. (n.d.). Sustained release drug delivery system: A review. International Journal of Research Publications, 3(9), 21–24
  23. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (1991). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed.). Lea & Febiger.
  24. Aulton, M. E. (2013). Aulton's pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines (4th ed.). Churchill Livingstone.
  25. Robinson, J. R., & Lee, V. H. L. (1987). Controlled drug delivery: Fundamentals and applications (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker Inc.
  26. Nagoba. S. N., Shafi. S., Ladde. S. S., Essentials of Novel drug delivery system (first edition) January – 2021 (130)
  27. Parashar, T., Singh, V., Singh, G., Tyagi, S., Patel, C., & Gupta, A. (2013). Novel oral sustained release technology: A concise review. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 2, 262–269.
  28. Chien, Y. W. (1992). Novel drug delivery systems (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
  29. Patel, R. P., Patel, M. M., & Patel, N. M. (2011). A review on sustained release drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, 2(12), 147–158.
  30. Brahmankar, D. M., & Jaiswal, S. B. (2015). Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics: A treatise. Vallabh Prakashan.
  31. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. (1987). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (3rd ed., pp. 293–373). Varghese Publishing House
  32. Lieberman, H. A., Rieger, M. M., & Banker, G. S. (Year). Pharmaceutical dosage forms: Tablets (Vol. 1). [Publisher].
  33. Al-Achi, A. (2019). Tablets: A brief overview. Journal of Pharma Practice and Pharmaceutical Science, 1(1), 49–52.
  34. Nagashree, K. (2015). Solid dosage forms: Tablets. Research and Reviews: Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 4(1), [Page range if known].
  35. Park, K., & Robinson, J. R. (1984). Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery: Method to study bioadhesion. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 19, 107–109.
  36. Chang, H. S. (2018). Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: Synthesis and evaluation of some swelling water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 74(4), 399–402.
  37. Aulton, M. E., & Taylor, K. M. G. (2018). Aulton's Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines (5th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
  38. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy (4th ed.). CBS Publishers & Distributors.
  39. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. (2021). United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 43–NF 38). Rockville, MD: USP.
  40. Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (2009). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients (6th ed.). Pharmaceutical Press.

Photo
Tengse K.A.
Corresponding author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
R.D. Ingole
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
P.D. Hajare
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
S.D. Sakhare
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
N.S. Chavan
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
R.M. Bhapkar
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
S.G. Awate
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

Photo
D.H. Ubale
Co-author

DJPS College of Pharmacy Pathri Dist. Parbhani Maharashtra

K. A. Tengse, R.D. Ingole, P.D. Hajare, S.D. Sakhare, N.S. Chavan, R.M. Bhapkar, S.G. Awate, D.H. Ubale, Advancements in Tablet Technology: A Review of Formulation, Process, and Quality Assurance, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 6, 2651-2663. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15654153

More related articles
Tamsulosin Versus Silodosin for The Treatment of D...
Y. Bhavana, T. Bhavana, S. D. Reshma, S. Balakrishna Reddy, Dr. M...
RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Quantification of ...
Aakash Chaudhari, DR. Chandrakant Suryawanshi, Dr. Rajendra Wagh,...
A Review: Herbal Novel Drug Delivery Systems...
Prachi Koli, Pranali Mane, Sakshi Shinde, Pranali Mahajan, Dr. D. R. Jadage, ...
Related Articles
Hand And Foot Syndrome With Hyperpigmentation By Capecitabine...
Asra Jabeen, Masrat Nabi, Sheikh H. Ismail, Zahid Akhtar, Sami Magray, Nasreen Chashoo, ...
AI In Pharmaceutics: Current Application and Future Direction...
Khairnar Tejaswini , Kapdane Shruti, Kawale Sakshi , Karad Rutika, Aher Pankaj , ...
Formulation & Evaluation of Polyherbal Antidiabetic Tablet...
Rajshri Tambe, Vaibhavi Kunjir , Jayshri Tambe , Rohini More , Prajakata kakade , Shivkumar Sontakke...
A Review on Transferosomes...
Mahendra Kumar Prajapati, Kavita Lovanshi, Rita Mourya, ...
More related articles
Tamsulosin Versus Silodosin for The Treatment of Distal Ureteric Stones: A Revie...
Y. Bhavana, T. Bhavana, S. D. Reshma, S. Balakrishna Reddy, Dr. M. Lakshmi Banusri, ...
RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Arjuna, Ashwagandha, and Pushk...
Aakash Chaudhari, DR. Chandrakant Suryawanshi, Dr. Rajendra Wagh, ...