View Article

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive comparison of the medical device dossier requirements in Uganda and the United States, highlighting the regulatory frameworks, submission processes, and compliance standards. By examining the regulatory agencies—the Uganda National Drug Authority (NDA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—the research identifies key differences and similarities in their approaches to medical device approval. The study delves into the classification systems, dossier content requirements, and review timelines, emphasizing how these factors impact market entry and compliance for medical device manufacturers. Special focus is given to the harmonization efforts and the role of international guidelines, such as those from the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), in shaping local regulations. Through a qualitative analysis of regulatory documents, interviews with regulatory experts, and case studies of specific medical device approvals, the research offers insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by stakeholders in both countries. The findings aim to inform regulatory bodies, manufacturers, and policymakers, promoting better understanding and potential improvements in the regulatory landscapes to enhance patient safety and innovation in medical device technology.

Keywords

Statistical market of medical device, Accessibility, Medical device regulatory requirement, Document required for UGANDA and USA country, Post-marketing surveillance, Approval process.

Introduction

Definition:

A medical device mean any instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, appliance, implant, reagent for in vitro use, software, material or other similar or related article, intended by the manufacturer to be used, alone or in combination, for human beings and animals for one or more of the specific medical purpose.

About NDA (National Drug Authority):

National Drug Authority (NDA) was established in 1993 by the National Drug Policy and Authority Statute which in 2000 became the National Drug Policy and Authority (NDP/A) Act, Cap. 206 of the Laws of Uganda (2000 Edition). The Act established a National Drug Authority to ensure the availability, at all times, of essential, efficacious and cost-effective drugs to the entire population of Uganda, as a means of providing satisfactory healthcare and safeguarding the appropriate use of drugs.(1)  The control of surgical instruments and appliances will be based on risk assessment and risk management such that the level of regulatory control applied to them is proportional to the degree of perceived risk associated with the surgical instrument and appliance. The requirements of the review process differ for each class, type and technology of the appliance.(1)

Introduction of USA:

The FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) oversees the regulation of companies involved in producing, packaging, labeling, and importing medical devices available for sale in the US. Furthermore, CDRH is tasked with regulating electronic products that emit radiation, including medical equipment like lasers and x-ray systems, as well as non-medical devices such as microwave ovens and color televisions.

CDRH role in Medical device:

CDRH places every kind of equipment into the proper class according to the regulatory control requirements (Class I: merely general controls; Class II: standards; and Class III: premarket approval).

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study is to conduct a comprehensive comparison of the regulatory requirements for medical device dossiers in Uganda and the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA).  This comparison will focus on regulatory framework, dossier requirement, market dynamics, technical documentation, and approval process.

DISCUSSION:

MEDICAL DEVICE DOSSIER IN UGANDA:

Overview:

Surgical instruments and appliances will undergo classification according to a risk assessment and management framework. Regulatory oversight will correspond to the perceived risk level of each device, ensuring a proportional approach. The review process varies depending on the class, type, and technological complexity of the appliance, tailored to meet specific requirements.(2)

Market cap of UGANDA



       
            Picture1.png
       

    


  • Revenue in the medical devices market in Uganda is projected to reach US$118.90m in 2024.
  • The market largest market is Cardiology Device with a project market volume of US$18.56m in 2024.
  • Revenue is expected to show an annual growth rate (2024-2028) of 7.57%, resulting in a market volume of US$159.20m by 2028.
  • In global comparison, most revenue will be generated in the United States US$182.0bn in 2024.

Device classification:

The classification of medical devices is essential to ensure their safety, efficacy, and quality. In Uganda, the National Drug Authority (NDA) is responsible for regulating medical devices. The risk-based classification system categorizes medical devices based on the potential risk they pose to patients and users. This document outlines the criteria and classes used in the classification of medical devices in Uganda.(1)(3)



       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221227.png
       

    


Application processing required document:

  • Accurately detail application letter (Hard copy & soft copy)
  • Bank deposit slip (prove of payment)
  • Sample of the product (if applicable)
  • Documentation / Dossier
  • Prior market history and approval

Registration flow chart:


       
            Picture1.png
       

    


Product registration dossier required technical document:


       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221252.png
       

    


Example of dossier format:


       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221827.png
       

    


Labelling requirement:

  1. provided in English,
  2. in a permanent and prominent manner,
  3. Legible and
  4. in terms that are easily understood by the intended user.

Example of label:


       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221827.png
       

   


MEDICAL DEVICE DOSSIER IN USA:

Market cap in USA

The U.S. medical devices market is anticipated to grow from $192.78 billion in 2023 to $291.04 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 6.1% during the forecast period. According to the U.S census bureau report, by 2060, the number of patient suffering from diabetes is projected to increase by 25.1% to 162 million.(8)

Device Classes and Regulatory Oversight:

  1. Class I General Controls

With Exemptions

Without Exemptions

2.Class II General Controls and Special Controls

With Exemptions

Without Exemptions

3.Class III General Controls and Premarket Approval(9)

 510(k) Notification:

Any individual looking to market a Class I, II, or III device in the US, intended for human use, and not requiring a Premarket Approval application (PMA), must file a 510(k) with the FDA, unless the device falls under an exemption from 510(k) requirements as specified in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and complies with the limitations outlined in .9 of the relevant device classification regulation chapters (e.g., 21 CFR 862.9, 21 CFR 864.9).(10) A 510(k) is a submission made to the FDA before marketing a device. It's meant to show that the device is similarly safe and effective, or substantially equivalent, to an already legally marketed device as per Section 513(i)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act.(10) The submitter must wait until they receive an order confirming that the device is substantially equivalent (SE) before proceeding with marketing. Upon receiving the SE determination, the device can then be marketed in the US. Typically, the SE determination is made within 90 days based on the information provided by the submitter.

510(k) Required when:

  1. Any new device market in first time
  2. Substantial change
  3. Change in intended use
  4. Different technological characteristic
  5. Combination product

510 (k) Submission process:

Acknowledgement of receipt:

You can submit your 510(k) application by sending either an e-STAR or an e-Copy.(10) Once you submit your 510(k) application to the FDA, they assign it a unique control number upon receipt. This number, known as the "510(k) number" or "K number," starts with the letter "K" followed by six digits.(10) The last four digits represent the sequential submission number for that year, starting with 0001 and increasing with each succeeding submission, while the first two digits indicate the calendar year the submission was received.

“KXXZZZZ”

Where, K = 510(k)

XX = years of submission

ZZZZ = sequence number

 

For example: the first 510(k) submission for calendar year 2022 is “K220001”

 

510(k) Submission process flow chart:



       
            Picture3.png
       

   


Pre-market approval:

The FDA's premarket approval (PMA) process involves a thorough scientific and regulatory review to assess the safety and efficacy of Class III medical devices. Class III devices are categorized as those crucial for supporting human life, significantly preventing health impairments, or posing a potential and unacceptable risk of illness or injury The regulation for premarket approval is found in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 814, which covers Premarket Approval of Medical Devices.

When PMA is required:

Class III devices, which are classified under the strictest regulatory category for medical devices, are subject to PMA criteria. The Product Classification Database can be used to find product classifications for devices. The device name, classification, and, if available, a link to the pertinent section of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) are included in the database search results. The device type name, device ID, and categorization data are all listed in the CFR.

The CFR provides a regulatory number for Class III devices that were sold before the Medical Device Amendments of 1976.  Use the three-letter product code to check the Premarket Approval (PMA) and the 510(k) Premarket Notification databases if you're not sure if the unclassified device needs a PMA. Furthermore, a new type of device may not be found in the product classification database. If the device is a high risk device, (Supports or maintains human life, is critically important in preventing health impairments, or poses a significant and unreasonable risk of illness or injury) Before being commercialized in the United States, a device must receive an approved PMA if it is found to be not substantially equivalent (NSE) to a Class I, II, or III [Class III needing 510(k)] device. Nevertheless, some devices may be eligible for the De Novo process to be classed as a Class I or Class II device if it is determined that they are not substantially equivalent to a certified Class I, II, or III (not requiring PMA) device.

Labelling:

Define ‘labeling’ as a:

First of all, let’s establish what labeling is and what it isn’t. Labeling is written, printed, or graphic matter affixed to or associated with a medical device that is related to its identification, technical description, or use.


Documents


       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221431.png
       

    


Example of US labelled:


       
            Picture4.png
       

    


UDI requirement:


       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221350.png
       

    


COMPARISON:


       
            Screenshot 2024-07-27 221350.png
       

    


CONCLUTION

The comparative study of medical device dossier requirements between Uganda and the USA highlights several key differences in regulatory frameworks, underscoring the need for Uganda to enhance its regulatory guidelines to ensure better compliance and patient safety.  To improve regulatory compliance and ensure the safety of medical devices, Uganda needs to update and revise its guidelines, making them more specific and comprehensive. By considering international guidelines such as those from the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF), and the US FDA, Uganda can enhance its regulatory framework. Implementing these improvements will align Uganda's regulations with global standards, thereby enhancing the safety, efficacy, and quality of medical devices available in the country.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The author received no specific funding for this work.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

REFERENCES

  1. National drug authority & policy act (registration) regulations, 2014 (s.i. no. 29 of 2014)
  2. Statistical market medical device in UGANDA
  3. Regulation and standards of medical devices in UGANDA
  4. Medical device regulation and oversight in african countries: a scoping review of literature and development of a conceptual framework.
  5. Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in UGANDA
  6. Guidelines on good manufacturing practice for surgical instruments and appliances
  7. Guidelines on registration of surgical instruments and appliances
  8. Statistical market medical device in USA.
  9. Medical device classification guide - how to determine your device class
  10. The 510(k) program: evaluating substantial equivalence in premarket notifications 510(k)
  11. Evaluating substantial equivalence in premarket notifications [510(k)]

Reference

  1. National drug authority & policy act (registration) regulations, 2014

(s.i. no. 29 of 2014)

  1. Statistical market medical device in UGANDA
  2. Regulation and standards of medical devices in UGANDA
  3. Medical device regulation and oversight in african countries: a scoping review of literature and development of a conceptual framework.
  4. Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in UGANDA
  5. Guidelines on good manufacturing practice for surgical instruments and appliances
  6. Guidelines on registration of surgical instruments and appliances
  7. Statistical market medical device in USA.
  8. Medical device classification guide - how to determine your device class
  9. The 510(k) program: evaluating substantial equivalence in premarket notifications 510(k)
  10. Evaluating substantial equivalence in premarket notifications [510(k)]

Photo
Krunal G. Kanjariya
Corresponding author

Mr.

Photo
Maitreyi Zaveri
Co-author

K.B Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kadi Sarva Vishwa Vidyalya, Gandhinagar, Gujarat.

Photo
Vinit Movaliya
Co-author

K.B Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kadi Sarva Vishwa Vidyalya, Gandhinagar, Gujarat.

Krunal G. Kanjariya , Maitreyi Zaveri, Vinit Movaliya, A Comparitive Study Medical Device Dossier Of UGANDA And USA , Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 7, 1989-1998. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13110193

More related articles
Ginkgo Biloba Used As Neuroprotective Action In Ve...
Kajal Gupta, Mansi Sharma, Ishu, Mukesh Choudhary, Aashutosh Sinw...
The Impact Of Nanotechnology On Drug Delivery Syst...
Pranjal tukaram lahare, Shiddhesh sunil chavan, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Buccoadhesive Drug D...
Akshay V. Patil, Dr. Gautam Mehetre, Vishal Murkute, Preeti More,...
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-acne Herbal Gel...
Arun Kumar K. V., Jusaira Abdul Jabbar, Sayooj V., Aromal M., Anakha S., Mufeeda, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal FaceWash...
Abubakar Shaikh, Tejashri Kedar , Sohel Shaikh, Aman Shaikh, Devang Shah, Harsh Meher, ...
Evaluation Of Antioxidant And Antibacterial Activity Of Zanthoxylum Armatum: A R...
Bhopesh Kumar , Dev Prakash Dahiya, Chinu Kumari, Munish Choudhary ...
Related Articles
Review Article On Hyperacidity ...
Madhavi Kakphale, Prof.komal chavan, Dr.kavita kulkarni, ...
A Review on Method Development for Simultaneous Estimation of Itraconazole and T...
Vanita B. Katore, Hemlata S.Bhawar, Geeta Nhavale, Rahul Godge, Sabafarin H.Shaikh, Mayur S.Bhosale,...
Therapeutic Potentials of Guggulu Formulations: A Review Through Medieval Centur...
Dr. Manasi D. Chunchuwar, Dr.Bharat Rathi, Dr.Piyush Chaudhary, Dr.Aditi R. Shinde, ...
An Interventional Study On Hemodialysis Patient And Impact Of Patient Counseling...
Basheera. V, Rahna Rasheed, Remeeza Jabbar, Rinsa. A, ...
Ginkgo Biloba Used As Neuroprotective Action In Vedas Technology ...
Kajal Gupta, Mansi Sharma, Ishu, Mukesh Choudhary, Aashutosh Sinwal, Akash Dinesh Shah, Aparna Balla...
More related articles
Ginkgo Biloba Used As Neuroprotective Action In Vedas Technology ...
Kajal Gupta, Mansi Sharma, Ishu, Mukesh Choudhary, Aashutosh Sinwal, Akash Dinesh Shah, Aparna Balla...
The Impact Of Nanotechnology On Drug Delivery System...
Pranjal tukaram lahare, Shiddhesh sunil chavan, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Buccoadhesive Drug Delivery System Containing A Br...
Akshay V. Patil, Dr. Gautam Mehetre, Vishal Murkute, Preeti More, ...
Ginkgo Biloba Used As Neuroprotective Action In Vedas Technology ...
Kajal Gupta, Mansi Sharma, Ishu, Mukesh Choudhary, Aashutosh Sinwal, Akash Dinesh Shah, Aparna Balla...
The Impact Of Nanotechnology On Drug Delivery System...
Pranjal tukaram lahare, Shiddhesh sunil chavan, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Buccoadhesive Drug Delivery System Containing A Br...
Akshay V. Patil, Dr. Gautam Mehetre, Vishal Murkute, Preeti More, ...