Abstract

Originally presented by FDA representatives Ted Byers and Bud Loftus in the 1970s to improve pharmaceutical standards, the idea of validation has developed into a key element of contemporary good manufacturing practices (cGMP). In the pharmaceutical industry, validation includes a range of tasks, including the use of analytical tools and automated systems, all with the goal of guaranteeing premium products at competitive prices. In order to define manufacturing process controls that will yield desired product attributes and prevent undesirable ones, process validation is essential. Validation is a hot topic in the pharmaceutical industry these days because it's crucial to preserving product quality and bolstering marketing campaigns. To satisfy regulatory standards and guarantee product quality, efficacy, and safety, process validation techniques must be used in addition to completed product testing. Verification helps lower expenses, boost output, and cut down on complaints, reworks, recalls, and product rejections. A certified process ensures consistency through extensive validations, offering a high degree of confidence for product quality and uniformity.

Keywords

Validation, Process validation method, Analytical tools, Product rejections, Productivity, Consistency, Regulatory requirements.

Introduction

---

       
           
       
    

---

VALIDATION PROCESS

The most significant and well-known cGMPs parameter is pharmaceutical process validation. Process validation is mandated under the quality system (QS) legislation. Producing goods that are suitable for their intended use on a regular basis is the aim of a quality system. To ensure that these goals and principles are fulfilled, process validation is a crucial component. Process validation is carried out following the validation and release of laboratory test methods, facilities, utilities, and equipment for use in process validation operations. Validation of limited analytical methods is required only when the compendia approach is employed.

 

PROCESS VALIDATION ELEMENTS

Validation requires qualification as a prerequisite. Among the qualifications are the following:

1. Design approval (DQ) the verified documentation confirming the appropriateness of the suggested facility, system, and equipment design for the intended use. The design's adherence to GMP should be shown in this criteria. Design concepts ought to be such that they accomplish GMP's equipment-related goals. It is important to look over the mechanical drawings and design elements that the equipment manufacturer has provided.
2. Installation Qualification (IQ): proving to be able to reliably operate process equipment and auxiliary systems within predetermined tolerances and limits. (FDA) The verified record attesting to the fact that the installed or altered facilities, systems, and equipment conform with the authorized design and the suggestions from the manufacturer. When installing new or modified systems, equipment, or facilities, installation certification should be done. The installation qualification should cover the major points listed below.

• Examining how pipes, instruments, services, and equipment are installed.
• Gathering the operational guidelines, maintenance specifications, and calibration needs from suppliers.
• Confirmation of construction supplies.
• Reliability and maintenance sources.

3. Operational Qualification (OQ):

This is the proof in writing that the equipment, systems, and facilities as installed or modified function as intended within the expected operating ranges. IQ ought to come first in operational qualification. OQ ought to contain the following:

• Examinations created based on an understanding of the procedures, methods, and apparatus
• Outlining the bottom and upper bounds of operation. These are sometimes referred to as "worst case" scenarios.

Performance Qualification (PQ) is the fourth:

 "It is a documented confirmation that, when compared collectively, the apparatus and supporting systems can operate efficiently and consistently in accordance with a recognized protocol and specification." PQ is demonstrating assurance that The procedure is reliable and repeatable, providing assurance that it adheres to the design specifications. A performance qualification is official documentation attesting to the equipment's perfect operation in your facilities. This is covered by ensuring that the equipment is appropriate for the environment in which it is used and for the purpose for which it was designed (e.g., adhering to safety rules to prevent accidents, transmitting traceable data). Using appropriate test techniques, performance qualification examines the equipment's crucial parameters. Test specifications provide as documentation for these procedures. Not every piece of equipment or instrument requires Performance Qualification. All process equipment, however, including crucial equipment, must undergo performance qualification. The inquiry on whether or not In general, performance qualification is carried out on a case-by-case basis. [13,14,15]

TYPES OF PROCESS VALIDATION:

1. Prospective validation
2. Concurrent validation
3. Retrospective validation
4. Revalidation

1. Prospective Process Validation:

According to a pre-planned process, this is the written proof that a system performs as intended. This validation is typically done before a new product or one produced using a modified manufacturing process is distributed, and it is done on at least three consecutive production sizes. (Secondary groups) Either the relevant standard operating procedures or the batch manufacturing and packing record should include these. It is important to specify boundaries, frequency ranges, and what will happen if those boundaries are crossed. Prospective validation ought to comprise, but not be restricted to, the subsequent: • A brief synopsis of the procedure.

• • An outline of the crucial processes in processing that need to be looked into.
  • A list of the facilities and equipment to be used, including measuring, tracking, and recording apparatus) as well as the state of its calibration.
  • Finished product specs ready for distribution.
  • An analysis methods list, as applicable.
  • Suggested acceptance criteria for in-process controls.
  • More testing will be done as needed, along with analytical validation and acceptance criteria.

The plan for sampling.

• • Procedures for tracking and assessing outcomes.
  • Activities and obligations.
  • The suggested timeline.

The size of the batches created for process validation ought to match that of the planned industrial scale batches. The conditions under which validation batches are produced, including the successful completion of the validation exercise and the marketing authorization, should fully comply with the requirements of Good Manufacturing Practice if it is intended for them to be sold or supplied.

2. Concurrent Process Validation:

This method resembles the prospective method, with the exception that the operational firm would charge the public the market price for the product throughout the qualifying runs. • This validation includes product testing as well as in-process monitoring of crucial processing steps. • Under exceptional circumstances, it might be appropriate to not finish a validation program before routine production begins. This helps to develop and document evidence that shows the production process is in a condition of control.

• The documentation requirements for concurrent validation are the same as those for prospective validation; the decision to conduct concurrent validation must be justified, recorded, and approved by authorized people.

3. Retrospective Process Validation:

This refers to the process of establishing written proof that a system performs as intended. Review and analysis of historical data is what it claims to accomplish. Production, QA, and QC records are the sources of this type of data. modifications to specifications, equipment, processes, and other pertinent prior modifications are the concerns that need to be addressed here. Retrospective validation is only applicable for processes that are well-established; it is inappropriate in cases when the product's composition, operating guidelines, or equipment have recently changed. In order to arrive at a conclusion and a recommendation, the procedures entail preparing a particular methodology and reporting the data review's findings. The data source for this validation should comprise, among other things, records of batch processing and packaging, process control charts, maintenance logbooks, personnel change records, and process capability assessments, data on the completed product, trend cards, and storage stability findings. Retrospective validation should only be used to batches that sufficiently show process consistency and are representative of all batches produced during the review period, including any that did not meet criteria. It could take longer to collect the right kind or quantity of data from retained sample testing in order to validate the method in hindsight. Data from ten to thirty consecutive batches should typically be analysed for retrospective validation in order to evaluate process consistency; however, fewer batches may be analyzed if necessary. Several of the fundamental components of retrospective validation batches produced during a specific time frame (no less than ten successive batches required). The annual number of lots released. • Manufacturer, year, period, batch size, and strength.

• Master documentation for production and packaging.
• Present standards for completed goods and active materials.
• List of modifications to manufacturing documents, corrective measures, and process deviations.
• Information for testing several batches' stability.

4. Revalidation:

This refers to the repeating of all or a portion of a validation process. This is done in the event that there are formulation, equipment, site, batch size, or other modifications. It is also done at predetermined intervals if there are no changes. Sequential batches that fail to satisfy product specifications are also considered for this. It offers proof that modifications to a process and/or its surrounding environment have no negative effects on the process's properties or the quality of the final product. The documentation needs will be identical to those for the first verification of the procedure. A review that provides proof that facilities, systems, equipment, and procedures adhere to the specified standards satisfies the criteria for revalidation in cases where no appreciable modifications have been made to the validated status. In rare circumstances, revalidation is required. Here are some of the modifications that need to be verified:

• Modifications to the raw materials (physical characteristics that might have an impact on the process or final product, such as moisture, viscosity, density, and distribution of particle sizes).
• Modifications to the manufacturer's source of active raw materials.
• Modifications to major container/closure system packaging materials
• Process modifications, such as adjustments to batch size, drying temperature, and mixing time [16,17,18]

Equipment validation

Equipment validation is a systematic, documented process that demonstrates any equipment operates properly and produces findings that are deemed reliable and accurate (predetermined result). The foundation of the equipment validation process is the idea that machinery needs to be built, maintained, and customized in order for it to carry out the intended functions. As the fundamental element of the pharmaceutical industry, equipment validation (the documentation of equipment's existence) is crucial before any activity is carried out in this sector.[19,20]

Equipment validation types:

Pharmaceutical equipment certification is a rather straightforward process in the pharmaceutical industry. According to the pharma industry /company's approval, each step of the procedure is carefully examined and recorded. Usually, manufacturing initiates the purchase process of the necessary records and the user requirements specifications (URS). A change request (CR) form from the current facilities must be obtained in order to carry out the validation project/plan (VP). Since management has already given its approval, the request to carry out the validation project (VP) has been made. After the VP has been approved, the validation protocol can begin, which is necessary to confirm that all cGMP criteria as well as requirements listed in the URS have been met.

Three primary phases comprise the equipment validation process: [20,21]

1. Phase – 1: Pre-validation phase.
2. Phase – 2: Process validation phase.
3. Phase – 3: Validation maintenance phase.

Pre-validation phase

Design Qualification (DQ):

This refers to a formal, documented process that verifies how manufacturing facilities and equipment are designed. Ensuring that all system requirements are spelled out in detail from the beginning is the primary goal of design qualification. A thorough consideration of all quality aspects during the design stage will be demonstrated by the design qualification procedure. In accordance with the user requirement specification (URS), the relevant cGMP laws and regulations, and other relevant information, it specifies the functional and operational specifications of the instrument. Once documented qualification is completed, it must confirm that the specified design will adhere to

Specifications for user requirements (URS) and functional specifications (FS)

• Drawings and specifications for the tender
• Vendor qualification; • Purchase specification; • User requirement specification (URS): The customer's list of needs and expectations is included in The apparatus.

The following are the standard needs of the client:

• The dimensions and area that the equipment takes up.
• The equipment's durability and effectiveness.
• How quickly the machinery operates.
• Low noise and air pollution levels should be found in equipment.
• The accessibility of spare parts and the low cost of services.
• Overall well-built.

Installation qualifications, or IQs, verify that the specified equipment has been delivered and installed in accordance with the agreed-upon goal and specifications, following the exact design or format, and in undamaged condition with all necessary components, parts, and services. The equipment's proper installation and calibration are confirmed through documentation. The goal of IQ is to guarantee that every component deployed correctly corresponds with the original (URS) design. The installation guidelines recommended by the manufacturer are followed, and the environmental conditions at the working site are verified and documented as appropriate for the instrument's operation. Name, color, model, and serial number of the equipment; manufacturer and supplier details; and other information are included in the installation paperwork.

 

• The calibration and installation dates. Method The operational qualification step of the validation phase guarantees that the installed equipment or instrument will operate as intended under the specified environmental conditions. In addition, it verifies that the testing results are accurately recorded and that the equipment operates flawlessly to fulfill predetermined performance standards. Ensuring that all dynamic situations align with the original (URS) design is the aim of the operational qualification process. It contains criteria that confirm that equipment is processing data correctly and according to specifications, as well as traceable electric stimulators. A high level of confidence was provided by operational qualification, which confirmed that the equipment complies with both user-required specifications (URS) and manufacturer-specified requirements. Operational qualification (also called process validation) guarantees that the equipment is processed by both the manufacturer and the user.

perspective of view supported by appropriate documentation confirmation. Operational validation documentation consists of the following: • Completed and authorized operations (functional testing)

• Certified calibrations
• SOP applications;
• System stability test findings;
• Performance qualification:

Performance qualification verifies that the apparatus continuously operates in accordance with the specified specifications, taking into account its regular or everyday usage. The facilities, usefulness, and performance of the equipment are all verified to meet pre-assigned acceptance criteria from the user requirement specification (URS) and manufacturer's specifications through a documented verification procedure. Performance qualification is carried out every day (or at least once every week) when equipment is being used or functioning is being done. It is done under controlled circumstances, much like daily sample analysis. It is sometimes referred to as system appropriateness testing, and the frequency of its tests is far higher than the operational qualification level. The stability of every component of the complete system, which affects the analysis outcome, as well as the equipment's functionality, determine how frequently the system is tested. [22,23,24,25]

Performance qualification reports and process stability testing reports (long-term productivity) are examples of documentation for performance validation.

• • Product record acceptance (customer reviews)
  • Documentation pertaining to actual product and process parameters.
  • Performing routine documentation of test results.
  • Re-validation: When the system or operating equipment are altered for any reason, re-validation is carried out. Maintaining the validity status of the individual components as well as the system as a whole is made much easier with the help of equipment revalidation. Revalidation is also utilized, in accordance with government rules, for the periodic validation check. [26]

The additional division of re-validation is as follows:

• Regular/planned re-validation
• Revalidation following alterations or revisions Periodic re-validation process: This is the term used to describe the re-validation procedure used periodically in the pharmaceutical business. because it is necessary, particularly if the business makes changes to its production processes, formulations, packing, or support systems like steam, water, and electricity. If the equipment needs to be revalidated, a different, highly qualified crew will arrive, with an analyst from the manufacturer handling the procedure. A small modification to the product can have a significant impact on its quality; therefore, validation is still required even after the smallest adjustment. Even during the initial validation, operational and performance tests were occasionally repeated. The modifications for which a re-validation is required are as follows:
• Change in raw material.
• Modifications to the production procedure.
• Equipment or system modification.
• Modification of auxiliary systems.
• Modifications to the packing materials. phase of validation maintenance
• MQ, or maintenance qualification: In order to validate the integrity of the equipment and system, maintenance qualification will examine and evaluate whether the maintenance controls are acceptable. Periodic recorded reviews of systems and equipment are necessary for maintenance. This routine procedure makes sure that contaminants or structural flaws in the machinery won't compromise the created product's identity, strength, or safety. Regular servicing and necessary repairs are part of the maintenance qualification procedure.

The following is a list of the maintenance qualification documentation:

• Records of outsourced services
• Specifics of maintenance contracts A list of engineers with authorized services Using equipment validation Here are some reasons why equipment validation is important in the pharmaceutical industry.

1. By decreasing rejects, reworks, and downtime, equipment validation lowers costs.
2. Reduce the possibility that regulations will not be followed.
3. A strong degree of client satisfaction.
4. The procedures for analytical testing and calibrations are followed.
5. Testing for both the finished product and the process is also decreased.
6. Boost workers' awareness as well.

Facilitate equipment maintenance.

1. Provide new equipment with a more dependable and swifter start-up.
2. Contribute to the facility's validation master plan creation.
3. As a presentation in the event of an inspection, the validation documents might be used. [27,28]

Analytical Method Development

The procedure for verifying that the analytical testing approach used for a specific test is appropriate for its anticipated purpose is  cited the validation of the procedure. The validation procedure yields results that are used to make a determination on the consistency of the analysis's conclusions. This makes sure that the product is dependable and of high quality. A well-developed approach is thought to be the essential step in a trustworthy testing procedure. It is this that defines the testing technique need. The studied method's performance capacities validate its reliability for the process requirement. The identification, purity, and possible action of medicine are insured by the analytical testing procedure that is suggested. Throughout this process, the physical attributes are also examined. An analysis of stability over a longer period of time is guaranteed by a sophisticated procedure. In the process of manufacturing the medicine, it also verifies its quality. Similarly, the process that has been established could support medication performance assessment. It safeguards the safety guidelines and the analysis of the physical attributes of characters [29]. A systematic process known as "method development" emerges concurrently with the advancement of medicinal products. The concept of appropriate method development is fundamental or crucial when discussing the expense, duration, productivity, and efficacy of the pharmaceutical product. The goal and intent of the approach ought to be taken into consideration during the medication development stage. The API's characteristics were focused on the first stages of the drug's development. Crucial to the pre-clinical experiment is the safety evaluation. step. Pre-formulation research ought to be done after that. After that come the stability studies. It seems sense to validate analytical methods in order to support these parameters. Subsequently, through an examination of the characteristics and nature of API, the analytical testing procedure is elucidated and expanded upon as the drug development proceeds. The process shouldn't be that difficult. It has to be sturdy. Adherence to appropriate regulatory norms is crucial [30]. Every stage of the drug's development requires a well-developed technique to ensure the desired outcome. It guarantees that  upgraded laboratory equipment. Significant work is done via a proven analytical procedure in order to provide high quality and accurate testing outputs. Everyone in the chemical lab then concentrates on ensuring the assurance of the QC instrument. There are several various kinds of analysis methods, including spectrum analysis, chromatographic analysis, and electrochemical analysis [31].  A well-developed procedure aids in the testing of drugs against specifications during the manufacturing and quality release operations. It also encourages research into the chemical properties, safety evaluations, and activity analyses of pharmaceuticals. The process of pharmaceutical synthesis is aided by the development of analytical processes. As the Drugs with possible activity are screened for with the help of formulation studies. Starting with the raw material phase and continuing through to the final formulation, the pharmaceutical medicine should be stable. Thus, it is important to routinely review stability studies. These processes build up the medicine's identification, purification, physical specifications, and prospective actions [32].

1. The purpose of the analytical method validation Should modifications be made to the formulation or concentration, additional validation need only be carried out if the analytical method's method validation is carried out.
2. It reduces the possibility of breaking regulations.
3. Thanks to the analytical method, the process's critical parameters may be thoroughly comprehended.
4. The reduction of disruptions to precision and accuracy
5. It is utilized for marketing licenses and product approvals for innovative, non-pharmacopeia products.[33]

Cleaning validation

Cleaning validation is the process of documenting proof with a high level of confidence that a system or piece of equipment can be routinely cleaned to predefined and acceptable limitations.  One of the main goals of good manufacturing practices (GMP) is to prevent cross-contamination and potential contamination of pharmaceutical products and starting materials. Two Cross-contamination must be avoided as much as possible in the design and execution of cleaning validation in manufacturing processes. Cleaning procedures must be able to remove residues from equipment to an acceptable level, since most pieces of equipment are used to make multiple goods. [34] Cleaning of processing areas and equipment apparatus is crucial in the pharmaceutical sector. Analytical investigation of a cleaning is assisted by cleaning validation. protocol. Preventing contaminated product made on the same equipment is the fundamental motivation behind an efficient and consistent cleaning process. Providing our patients with top-notch pharmaceutical items is the goal. [35]

PURPOSE:

 The cleaning validation's goal is to confirm that the cleaning process is effective in eliminating any remaining product residues, degradation products, preservatives, excipients, or cleaning agents, as well as any possible microbiological contaminants. In order to ensure the purity and safety of the product, the cleaning procedure needs to be validated for the following reasons: (1) it is required by the customer; (2) it is a regulatory requirement for products that contain active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs); and (3) it also assures the process's quality from an internal control and compliance standpoint. [36,37]

Why Is Cleaning Validation Needed?

Cleaning methods must be evaluated to guarantee that there are no dangers related to cross-contamination of active substances or detergents/sanitizers. [38]

An essential part of quality control is efficient cleaning.

GMP security for patients. Poor cleaning can result in contaminated products that are tainted by the cleaning solution, the prior product, and any foreign substances added to or produced during the process. [39]

Selecting a Cleaning Agent:

The all-purpose solvent is water. By all means, use water alone if it will clean the product efficiently without requiring excessive time or physical effort to eliminate the residues. For a considerable number of people, however, cleaning with water alone takes an unacceptably long period. For those who fall into this category, one of the alternative strategies needs to be taken.

Solvent:

Usually used in operations where the manufacturing process already requires the use of solvents. As an illustration, mother Usually, liquors are employed as the solvents in API cleaning procedures. There is less risk when using the mother liquors for cleaning because it is already recognized to dissolve the major residue.

Commodity chemicals

In this case, cleaning can also be done with chemicals like NaOH. Similar to their solvent equivalents, these materials might have effluent or hazard problems. However, their generally high alkalinity or low acidity makes them useful in processes of inactivation. These chemicals, however, may be more difficult to rinse off of systems than formulated cleaning agents since they lack the detergency of formulated cleaning agents and require higher amounts of water to do so. The most extensive category of cleaners is called "formulated cleaning agent." As this category consists of both aqueous and solvent-based formulations. A solvent or water, along with one or more sources of alkalinity or acidity, surfactant builders, sequestrants, and chelants, are often included in the formulation of cleaning agents. These materials are designed to be low foaming in industrial applications, which makes them more easily rinsed and suitable for high impingement or high turbulence cleaning than solutions intended for consumer use.

Cleaning Procedure:

To ensure that there are no chances of discrepancies throughout the cleaning process, cleaning processes should be well specified. The best way to clean equipment is to thoroughly assess its design together with the product residues that need to be cleaned, the cleaning methods that may be used, and the cleaning solutions that are available. [40,41]

Equipment parameters to be evaluated:

• Location of the equipment that has to be cleaned · Areas that are hard to clean · Material properties
• Fixity or not

Cleaning validation has the following benefits:

• • • Lower utility costs; · Prevents market recall.
• Facilitated equipment maintenance.
• Avoiding the need for capital expenses.
• Minimization of reworks and rejections.
• Minimize accidents and enhance safety outcomes.

The manufacturing process is typically intricate and expensive, which is one of the disadvantages of cleaning validation. It is also a time-consuming procedure.

Utilizing Cleaning Validation in Applications

• Reduction in quality expenditure:
• Preventive expenses are charges incurred in order to avert failures.
• The estimated expenses of inspection, testing, and quality assessment. · External failure costs related to non-compliant situations.
• The expenses of internal failure

Improved consumer quality:

Proper cleaning validation prevents market recall, which leads to improved customer service and product quality. what's being sold. Four categories comprise quality expenses. These include: · Preventive costs. · Appraisal charges.

 Internal failure expenses.

The expenses of external failure

Ensuring quality:

Validation cleaning and process optimization are essential for confirming the product's grades. They are also essential instruments in GMPs since without them, quality acquisition is impossible.

Safety

The safety of operations is enhanced by validating and calibrating working instruments and circumstances. They prioritize safety as validation is tastefully standardized. [41,42]

REFERENCES: