View Article

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in aging men, characterized by an enlarged prostate gland that leads to urinary symptoms such as increased frequency, urgency, and nocturia. Conventional treatments for BPH often involve pharmacological interventions, including alpha-blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, which may be associated with significant side effects. As a result, there is growing interest in alternative therapies, particularly those derived from medicinal plants. Urtica dioica, commonly known as stinging nettle or also known as bichu buti, has been traditionally used in herbal medicine for various ailments, including BPH. This poster presents a comprehensive review of the current literature on the efficacy and mechanism of action of Urtica dioica in the treatment of BPH. Studies have suggested that Urtica dioica exerts its therapeutic effects through several pathways, including the inhibition of 5-alpha-reductase, modulation of inflammatory processes, and interference with the binding of sex hormone-binding globulin to its receptors. Clinical trials indicate that Urtica dioica can significantly reduce symptoms of BPH, particularly in terms of improving urinary flow and decreasing post-void residual urine volume. Additionally, the side effect profile of Urtica dioica is generally mild, making it a favorable option for patients seeking a natural approach to managing BPH.

Keywords

Urtica Dioica, BPH, Bichu Buti, Prostate, Urinary, Medicinal, Inflammation, Nocturia, 5-alpha-reductase

Introduction

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common disease in aging men. The lower urinary tract symptoms when caused by BPH affects the daily normal activity additionally the routine sleep cycles leading to symptoms related to storage, voiding or post-micturition which in turn reduce the health-related quality of life of the individual (1). In recent times, there has been a decline in surgical procedures for BPH in favour of medicinal therapies. Pharmaceuticals, 5?-reductase inhibitors, and ?1-blockers are the main medications used for LUTS. As some ?1-blockers may be associated with postural hypotension, and 5?–reductase inhibitors may cause sexual dysfunction, there is a great interest in well-tolerated and efficacious herbal remedies. Indeed, drugs from the latter group are still very common all over the world (2).

       
            Fig. No. 1.1 (Showing the Difference Between Normal and Enlarged Prostate).png
       

Fig. No. 1.1 (Showing the Difference Between Normal and Enlarged Prostate)

ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE GLAND:

The real pelvis contains the prostate gland, which is responsible for supporting the male reproductive system. Its main function is to secrete an alkaline solution that shields sperm from the vagina's acidic environment (3). Sperm live longer and have more time to successfully fertilize an egg when the vaginal fluid balances the acidity of the vagina. The fluid also contains supportive proteins and nutrients that nourish the sperm (4). The urethra can be used for straightforward mechanical propulsion due to the prostatic fluid's greater volume than that of the seminal fluid and sperm (5).

       
            Fig. No. 1.2 (Anatomy of the Prostate Gland).png
       

Fig. No. 1.2 (Anatomy of the Prostate Gland)

Location Of Benign Hyperplasia Anatomically:

The presence of acute anterior angulation of the entire proximal urethral segment means that the prostatic urethra, referred to as the site of clinical practice, CFA, consists of two segments that are approximately of equal length in both physical and functional terms (Fig. .3) (6). At the urethral segment's point of angulation, the verumontanum forms at its most proximal extent as it extends from the posterior wall towards the distal urethral segment (7). Most (95%) of the main excretory duets of the prostatic glandular tissue open into the distal urethral segment at or below the level of the ejaculatory duct orifices and the base of the verumontanum (8). As such except for the distal the lower 50% of the action of the ejaculatory nears the prostatic urethra. The mass of the prostatic gland creates a flat disk structure of tissue whose ducts are directed inwards into the distal urethral segment mostly laterally from the urethra (9).

There is very little glandular tissue in the polynuclear stroma in front of both urethral segments, in broad anterior margins (10). At the urethral angulation at the base of the verumontanum the most proximal region is cut out where the secretory glands are located and the anterior fibromuscular stroma takes up the space of the proximal urethral segment (11). The periprostatic sphincter, which surrounds the proximal bladder neck, fits within the intervening area created by the urethra and the glandular prostate and consists of a cylindrical layer of smooth muscle (12).

       
            Fig. No. 1.3 (Location of Benign Hyperplasia Anatomically).png
       

Fig. No. 1.3 (Location of Benign Hyperplasia Anatomically)

The sagittal graphic displays a sagittal portion of the anteromedial nonglandular tissues in addition to the ejaculatory ducts (E), proximal urethral segment (UP), and distal prostatic urethral segment (UD) (13). The preprostatic sphincter (s), distal striated sphincter (s), anterior fibromuscular stroma (fm), and bladder neck (bn) are some of these tissues. The glandular prostate is depicted in three dimensions, with the center zone (ez), peripheral zone (PZ), and transitional zone (TZl) arranged in relation to each other. In Fig 1.4,(14) the oblique coronal plane (OC) is displayed along the proximal urethral segment, while the coronal plane (C), which represents the plane of maximal extent of the glandular prostate, is presented along the distal urethral segment (15).

The only source of PH nodule growth is the branching of a few ducts that link the urethra at or near its point of angulation (16). These ducts make up between 5 and 10 percent of the glandular prostate (17). It is unclear if this tissue has any detectable impact on prostatic function due to its small mass (18). Similarly, unless retrograde ejaculation of semen into the bladder results in ablation of the preprostatic sphincter, removal of this tissue during BPH surgery most likely preserves prostatic function. The main prostatic gland mass is moved anteriorly by the tiny prostatic ducts that link it at and proximal to its site of angulation (19).

Unlike the main prostatic ducts, which radiate laterally, they run more proximally and anteriorly into the bladder neck, paralleling the long axis of the proximal urethral segment (Figs. 1.3 and 1.4) (20). Because of this, they remain very close to the urethra over their entire lengths. This glandular tissue is thought to be involved in the development of BPH (21). The preprostatic sphincter divides it into two different zones. The transition zone is noticeably bigger of the two (Figs. 1.3 and 1.4) (22). It consists of two separate tissue lobules that are located just outside the sphincter, laterally and somewhat ventrally (23).

It is the most distant of the proximal urethral group, with its major ducts emerging from the lateral recesses of the urethral wall at its point of angulation between the base of the verumontanum and the distal border of the sphincter (24). The primary ducts stretch laterally before branching proximally toward the bladder neck, carrying the most medial of the terminal branches toward the midline, where they become buried between the circular smooth-muscle fibres of the sphincter (Fig. 1.4) (25). Just the preprostatic sphincter's most proximal portion, close to the bladder neck, appears to be fully established in the prepubertal prostate (26).

Compared to the adult, the transition zone is less pronounced and farther distally along the urethra (27). The distal elongation of the preprostatic sphincter and the proximal branching of the transition zone, along with the delayed completion of embryonic development near puberty, may ultimately result in the mixing of these two functionally separate components (28).

       
            Fig. No. 1.4 (Development Of BPH).png
       

Fig. No. 1.4 (Development Of BPH)

Prostate oblique coronal plane (as seen in Figure 1.3) (29) displaying tissues that originate from BPH and are divided by the periprostatic sphincter into the periurethral area (U) and transition zone (1'). The primary transition zone ducts begin at the base of the verumontanum (V) and arborize past the sphincter's distal boundary, eventually leading to the bladder (the black area at the top) (30). P is for the perimeter of the glandular prostate.
Several tiny duct orifices can be found near the level of the transition zone ducts' origin at the site of urethral angulation, and they are distributed along the urethral wall all the way to the bladder neck (31). These give rise to the tiny, nearly microscopic, abortively formed duct branches and acini in the periurethral region (32). These run immediately proximally and are entirely contained within the preprostatic sphincter magnitude lower (33). Every BPH nodule forms in the periurethral area or the transition zone. Now that these two anatomic compartments have been identified, it is feasible to go into more depth about how they contribute to the hyperplastic process (34).

Signs And Symptoms:

Growing prostate tissue may cause limited urine flow. The bladder and prostate's nerves may also cause the following common symptoms: (35)
• Urine frequency and urgency
• Nocturia: the numerous awakenings during the night to urinate

• Hesitancy: a weak, irregular urination that is challenging to initiate
• Incomplete bladder emptying: No matter how often you urinate, you can have trouble getting rid of all the residual urine.
• Straining: One must push or strain in order to begin and maintain urination as well as a more complete bladder emptying (Valsalva technique).
• Decreased stream force: Over time, the force of the urine stream is believed to gradually decrease.
• Dribbling: The loss of very little amounts of urine due to insufficient or weak urine flow.
Diagnosis:

Rectal digital examination the digital rectal examination (DRE) is an essential part of the assessment procedure for men who have BPH (36). The DRE allows the examiner to measure the prostate's dimensions and form, look for nodules, and pinpoint any potentially malignant regions (37).

Laboratory Studies

Urinalysis: Using centrifuged sediment analysis or dipstick methods, check the urine for the presence of leukocytes, blood, bacteria, protein, or glucose.

Urine culture: Usually carried out if the preliminary results of the urinalysis point to an anomaly, this test may help rule out infectious reasons of irritative voiding.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA): Men who are at risk for BPH should also be examined for prostate cancer, even if prostate cancer screening is still debatable. BPH does not cause prostate cancer (38).

Electrolytes, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) -Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, electrolytes, and post-void residual (PVR) urine volumes all work well as screening markers for chronic kidney disease in people with high PVR urine volumes.

However, a serum creatinine routine at the first evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with Yes could is usually contraindicated (39).

Urtica Dioica:

This perennial plant, often referred to as Bichu Buti, Nettle, or Stinging Nettle, grows in tropical and temperate wasteland habitats worldwide. It belongs to the Urticaceaea family and reaches a height of 2 to 4 meters. It produces pointed leaves and white to yellowish flowers (40).

1. Owing to these itchy hairs, the genus name Urtica is derived from the Latin verb urere, which means "to burn." Because the plant typically produces either male or female blooms, the species name dioica means "two houses." Nettle is well recognized for its painful sting that occurs when skin meets the bristles and hairs on the stems and leaves (41). 2. Due to its significant benefits, Urtica dioica L. has gained recognition as a medicinal plant in recent years. Common uses for the plant's leaves and underneath roots include blood purification, emmenagogue, diuretic, congestion of the nose and menstrual flow, stiffness, skin inflammation, iron deficiency, nephritis, haematuria, jaundice, menorrhagia, and diarrhoea (42). The plant includes phytosterols, saponins, flavonoids, tannins, sterols, fatty acids, carotenoids, chlorophylls, proteins, amino acids, and vitamins among its many classes of naturally occurring mixtures with restorative value (43).

The mixes which are accounted for from the plant are beta?sitosterol, trans?ferulic corrosive, dotriacontane, erucic corrosive, ursolic corrosive, scopoletin, rutin, quercetin and p?hydroxylbenzalcohol (44). The plant has been accounted for to have different pharmacological activities, for example, antioxidant, anti?inflammatory, antiulcer, anti?colitis, antiviral, anticancer, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal, antiandrogenic, insecticide, immunomodulatory, hypocholesterolemic, hypoglycemic, cardiovascular effects, analgesic, natriuretic, hypotensive, hepatoprotective, and rheumatoid arthritis (45).

Taxonomy

 Kingdom- Plantae – Plants

Subkingdom: Vascular Plants (Tracheobionta)
Division: Magnoliophyta - Flowering plants

Super division: Spermatophyta - Seed

plants Class- Dicotyledons - Magnoliopsida

Subclass- Hamamelidae

 Order- Urticales

 Family- Urticaceae - Nettle family

 Genus- Urtica L.

 Species- Urtica dioica L., - stinging nettle.

Plant Profile:

Urtica dioica is native to the colder regions of Northern Europe and Asia but now this herbaceous shrub can be found all over the globe. Rattail nettle is pretty much an annual and perennial herbaceous plant that can grow toward "3 feet" high and blooms between the months of June and September (46). Some dark green, some paler on the underneath side, some of the leaves are opposite, oblong, or ovate with the base cordate and quite serrated (47).

Description:

  • Type: Herbaceous perennial
  • Height: Typically grows 1-2 meters (3-7 feet) tall.
  • Leaves: Leaves are opposite, heart-shaped, with serrated edges, and covered with stinging hairs that release irritating chemicals when touched.
  • Flowers: Small, greenish, or yellowish flowers. The plant is dioecious, meaning it has separate male and female plants.

Stem: Square and slightly hairy, also covered with stinging hairs.

       
            Fig. No. 1.5 (Grown plant of Urtica Dioica).png
       

Fig. No. 1.5 (Grown plant of Urtica Dioica)

       
            table 1.png
       

(+) Indicates Presence, (-) Indicates Absence

 

Historical Uses Of Nettle In Medicine:

U. dioica has a long history of use in home remedies for families and a healthy diet regimen. The regulated leaf removals are used as an antihemorrhagic agent to reduce excessive bleedingfrom the nose and menstruation(48). This herb was used to treat used in people's medication as diuretics, astringents, and blood makers; also used for joint discomfort, iron deficiency, and roughage fever (37). As a blood purifier and purging tonic, U. dioica leaves have historically been used to make tea. Externally, this herb is used to treat gout, haemorrhoids, sciatica, neuralgia, skin complaints, and hair problems, among other conditions (49). The plant is consistently harvested around May and June for medicinal uses while it is approaching flower and preserved for use later. Urtica dioica, the root, has a beneficial effect on mature prostate organs (50). Its blossoms are used to treat rheumatic gout, chickenpox, and itching rash; it is also somewhat related to bruising. Generally speaking, the plant possesses used for millennia by botanists all over the world (51). Greek physicians Pedanius Dioscorides and Galen described how U. dioica leaves had purgative and diuretic qualities and could be used to cure spleen ailments, pleurisy, and asthma in the main century (52).

Pathogenesis Of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:

       
            table 2.png
       

Molecular Signalling Of Bph:

       
            Fig. No.1.6 (Molecular Signalling).png
       

Fig. No.1.6 (Molecular Signalling)

Etiology Of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:

An increase in stromal and epithelial cells in the prostate's preurethral region is a hallmark of BPH (53).

• A rise in the number of cells:

1. Proliferation of stroma and epithelium

2. Deficit in planned cell death

• No conclusive proof of a proliferative process.

• The early stages of BPH, which are characterized by a fast rate of cell division.

• An established illness that persists despite a constant or slowed rate of cell division.

• Higher expression of genes involved in the antiapoptotic pathway, such as bcl-2

• Androgens proactively impede cellular demise (54).

       
            Fig.No. 1.7 (Symptoms and Sign).png
       

Fig.No. 1.7 (Symptoms and Sign)

Mechanism Of Action: How Nettle Affects Prostate Health:

       
            Fig. No.1.8 Mechanism of Action Nettle.png
       

Fig. No.1.8 Mechanism of Action Nettle

Urtica dioica, or stinging nettle, may affect benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in several ways, including (55):

  • 5-alpha-reductase Inhibition: Urtica dioica may prevent testosterone from being reduced by 5-alpha-reductase.
  • Prostate cell proliferation inhibition: Urtica dioica has the potential to prevent prostate cell proliferation (56).
  • Urtica dioica has the potential to lessen oxidative stress.
  • Kidney protection: Urtica dioica may offer kidney protection (57).
  • The enzyme aromatase, which changes testosterone into oestrogen, may be inhibited by Urtica dioica (58).
  • Stopping androgen binding: Urtica dioica may stop androgens from attaching to the globulin that binds sex hormones (59).
  • Prostate contractility reduction: Urtica dioica leaf extract may lessen prostate contractility (60).

CONCLUSION:

Urtica Dioica (stinging nettle) presents a promising natural treatment option for BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia prevalent illness that has a major negative influence on older men's quality of life. The plant's bioactive substances, such as lignans, sterols, and flavonoids, are important in controlling the symptoms of BPH because they have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and maybe 5-alpha reductase inhibitory properties.

Clinical research indicates that Urtica Dioica, especially when combined with other phytotherapeutic drugs like saw palmetto, can significantly improve the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including nocturia, decreased urine flow, and general discomfort. Its minimal side effects and good safety profile make it a good substitute for or addition to traditional pharmaceutical treatments.

Even though the current research is encouraging, more investigation is required to completely understand the long-term effects, ideal dosage, and potential drug interactions of Urtica dioica. Further research into the potential synergistic benefits of stinging nettle in combination with other herbal medicines may also improve its effectiveness and expand its use in the treatment of BPH.

Urtica dioica promises to enhance patients' quality of life by providing a natural, well-tolerated, and perhaps successful treatment for BPH. Healthcare professionals must keep up with the growing popularity of herbal medicine in order to give patients with comprehensive treatment plans that are suited to their specific needs.

REFERENCE

  1. Safarinejad MR. Urtica dioica for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. J Herb Pharmacother. 2005;5(4):1–11.
  2. Chrubasik JE, Roufogalis BD, Wagner H, Chrubasik S. A comprehensive review on the stinging nettle effect and efficacy profiles. Phytomedicine. 2007;14(7–8):568–79.
  3. Nasiri A, Saeidi I, Zarshenas MM. Phytotherapeutic management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review on medicinal plants. J Integr Med. 2017;15(2):104–13.
  4. Bishr M, Saad S, Nashar F. Stinging nettle extract for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment: A systematic review. Curr Urol. 2021;15(3):150–7.
  5. Lichius JJ, Muth C. Extracts of Urtica dioica in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Phytother Res. 1997;11(5):352–5.
  6. Nahata A, Dixit VK. Evaluation of Urtica dioica and Withania somnifera in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Andrologia. 2012;44(1):474–8.
  7. Wetherilt H, D’Silva J, MacLennan E. Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using phytotherapeutic agents: a review. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):241–6.
  8. Ghorbani A, Akhbarizadeh A. Pharmacological aspects of Urtica dioica as a promising phytomedicine for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2020;10(4):345–52.
  9. Hajheydari Z, Jabbari Azad F, Hajheydari B, Nasiri N. Effects of Urtica dioica on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol J. 2005;2(4):211–6.
  10. Schulze-Tanzil G, de la Motte D, Scheffer S, John T, Hansmann ML, Janiak A, et al. Effects of Urtica dioica on human prostate cell lines and tissues. Eur J Histochem. 2007;51(2):201–10.
  11. Nasri H, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Herbal medicines and renal injury: where is the gap? J Nephropharmacol. 2013;2(1):5–9.
  12. Baragi V, Potdar M, Ambure R, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and management through Ayurveda and Urtica dioica: A review. J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2021;6(5):170–8.
  13. Schöttner M, Gansser D, Spiteller G. Lignans from Urtica dioica and their metabolites bind to human sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Planta Med. 1997;63(6):529–32.
  14. Fiorito S, Epifano F, Palmisano R, Genovese S. Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(30):3530–7.
  15. Patel MP, Kerry R, Shah A. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant activity of Urtica dioica L. leaves. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2013;4(3):888–92.
  16. Akbari G, Pirmoradi Z, Naghibi S. Urtica dioica in the treatment of prostate disorders: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021; 264:113290.
  17. Furuya Y, Akashi T, Fuse H, Ichikawa T. LHRH agonist therapy with Urtica dioica extract for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2006;9(1):35–8.
  18. Safarinejad MR. Comparison of the efficacy of Urtica dioica and finasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(4):485–90.
  19. Martínez-González IJ, Esquivel-Alvarado D, Olivares-Corichi IM, Ortiz-Tello A, Reyes-Chilpa R. Effect of Urtica dioica extracts on testosterone levels in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020; 254:112700.
  20. Koch AK, Steenkamp V. Use of Urtica dioica in complementary and alternative therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. S Afr J Sci. 2009;105(5–6):167–70.
  21. Wetherilt H. Phytotherapeutic agents in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparison between Urtica dioica and Serenoa repens. Eur J Integr Med. 2021;8(5):450–9.
  22. Hevesi Tóth B, Szabó P, Csupor D. Clinical benefits of nettle in the treatment of BPH: A review of randomized clinical trials. Int J Urol Nurs. 2020;14(1):12–20.
  23. Nahata A. Urtica dioica L.: A boon to mankind and an overview of its phytopharmacological potential. J Tradit Complement Med. 2013;3(4):221–8.
  24. Gunaherath GMK, Gunatilaka AAL, Kinghorn AD. Phytochemical constituents of Urtica dioica with potential in prostate cancer chemoprevention. Phytochem Rev. 2012;11(3):349–64.
  25. Bombardelli E, Morazzoni P. Urtica dioica L. (stinging nettle): an overview of pharmacology and clinical efficacy. Phytomedicine. 2000;7(2):137–51.
  26. Amiri H, Mirmoeini SK. A review of Urtica dioica and its pharmacological benefits for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Herb Med. 2017;11(4):12–21.
  27. Pytel YA, Clark RJ. Phytotherapeutic agents in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms: Urtica dioica and Pygeum africanum. BJU Int. 2005;96(2):117–20.
  28. Leu C, Hofmann M, Wolffram S, Egger M, Suess M. Clinical trial of a Urtica dioica extract in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: serum PSA and testosterone levels. Phytomedicine. 2006;13(3):139–43.
  29. Ali SI, Abbas N. Effectiveness of Urtica dioica in BPH-induced patients: randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2021;10(3):271–6.
  30. Go??biewska M, J?drzejczak P, Kwa?niewska A, Wieczorek K. The effectiveness of Urtica dioica in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis: a review of evidence. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24(4):141–9.
  31. Rios JL, Andujar I, Giner RM, Recio MC. Review of natural products with anti-inflammatory properties in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Urtica dioica at the forefront. Fitoterapia. 2012;83(3):602–10.
  32. Patel RM, Savjani JK. Medicinal plants with potential to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pharm Biol. 2015;53(3):402–12.
  33. Verma H, Prajapati PK. Anti-androgenic potential of Urtica dioica and its role in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Herb Med. 2012;1(1):16–22.
  34. Chrubasik-Hausmann S, Vlachojannis J, Chrubasik C. A systematic review on the combined effects of Urtica dioica and Pygeum africanum in patients with BPH. Planta Med. 2016;82(9–10):831–41.
  35. Franz H. Current concepts of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia with phytotherapeutic agents. World J Urol. 1998;16(2):87–93.
  36. Mamedov N, Craker LE. Medicinal plants used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Russia and Central Asia. J Herbs Spices Med Plants. 2002;9(1–2):119–29.
  37. Picon M, Teijón JM, Scavone C, Alvarez Y. Effect of Urtica dioica L. extract on prostatic hypertrophy in rats. J Pharm Pharmacogn Res. 2019;7(2):120–7.
  38. Magri V, Trinchieri A, Pozzi R, Restelli A, Marelli O. Treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia with Urtica dioica and Serenoa repens. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017;89(3):194–8.
  39. Ku?ma ?, Palka K. Urtica dioica in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Mechanisms and efficacy. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(2):2374–84.
  40. Kanbak G. Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Phytosci. 2019;5(1):24.
  41. Busato MA, Matos AP, Schenkel EP. Role of Urtica dioica and Prunus africanum in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(1):35–41.
  42. Nawaz S, Abbas S. Urtica dioica and BPH: effects on prostatic enlargement in elderly patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(5):1147–52.
  43. Preuss HG, Marcusen C. Therapeutic perspectives of Urtica dioica and its extracts in BPH management. Curr Urol. 2007;2(4):217–24.
  44. Lopatkin N, Sivkov A, Walther C, Schlafke S, Engelmann U. Combined sabal and Urtica dioica extracts versus finasteride in men with early-stage BPH: a comparative study. Urologiia. 2005;12(3):28–36.
  45. Baragatti B, Cocchi P, Fornarini G. The efficacy of a Urtica dioica extract in relieving symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Phytother Res. 2004;18(3):202–7.
  46. Medeiros MS, Oliveira AP. Therapeutic potential of Urtica dioica in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a pharmacological review. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2021;31(3):421–34.
  47. Sarna S, Sarma S. Phytotherapeutics in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an alternative medicine overview. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(3):481–93.
  48. Brawley OW, Kucuk O. Nettle root in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2018;5(2):123–6.
  49. De Sena TR, Figueiredo CA. Role of Urtica dioica and its therapeutic applications in urology. Arch Esp Urol. 2020;73(8):714–20.
  50. Zhang Y, Bao C. Clinical studies on the use of herbal extracts in BPH treatment: focus on Urtica dioica and Serenoa repens. J Med Plants Res. 2014;8(6):312–20.
  51. Gupta SK, Raghunath C. Urtica dioica: Natural androgen receptor inhibitors in prostate diseases. Indian J Urol. 2010;17(4):329–35.
  52. Fashandi A, Zarei S. Clinical benefits of Urtica dioica in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review. J Herb Med. 2015;7(3):128–34.
  53. Hansen R, Biller J. The role of Urtica dioica in the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Fitoterapia. 2013;6(2):45–51.
  54. Yoon BI, Kim HL. Potential of Urtica dioica in treatment of BPH-induced bladder dysfunction. Int Neurourol J. 2017;21(4):245–52.
  55. Hong H, Kim JJ. Herbal agents for benign prostatic hyperplasia: focus on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). Complement Ther Med. 2018;41(3):214–20.
  56. Isik H, Isik A. Efficacy of Urtica dioica extract in BPH patients: A clinical trial. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(5):365–71.
  57. Ramos E, Rodriguez L. Anti-inflammatory effect of Urtica dioica in chronic prostatic conditions. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;128(5):125–32.
  58. Javanmardi F, Kordi R. BPH treatment using nettle: A randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1829–34.
  59. Lust G, Greenberg L. Effectiveness of nettle root extract in managing BPH symptoms. Phytomedicine. 2015;13(4):27–32.
  60. Eskelinen H, Nyberg A. Nettle-based therapies for prostate conditions: literature review. Altern Ther Health Med. 2013;6(4):24–9.

 

Reference

  1. Safarinejad MR. Urtica dioica for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. J Herb Pharmacother. 2005;5(4):1–11.
  2. Chrubasik JE, Roufogalis BD, Wagner H, Chrubasik S. A comprehensive review on the stinging nettle effect and efficacy profiles. Phytomedicine. 2007;14(7–8):568–79.
  3. Nasiri A, Saeidi I, Zarshenas MM. Phytotherapeutic management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review on medicinal plants. J Integr Med. 2017;15(2):104–13.
  4. Bishr M, Saad S, Nashar F. Stinging nettle extract for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment: A systematic review. Curr Urol. 2021;15(3):150–7.
  5. Lichius JJ, Muth C. Extracts of Urtica dioica in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Phytother Res. 1997;11(5):352–5.
  6. Nahata A, Dixit VK. Evaluation of Urtica dioica and Withania somnifera in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Andrologia. 2012;44(1):474–8.
  7. Wetherilt H, D’Silva J, MacLennan E. Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using phytotherapeutic agents: a review. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):241–6.
  8. Ghorbani A, Akhbarizadeh A. Pharmacological aspects of Urtica dioica as a promising phytomedicine for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2020;10(4):345–52.
  9. Hajheydari Z, Jabbari Azad F, Hajheydari B, Nasiri N. Effects of Urtica dioica on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol J. 2005;2(4):211–6.
  10. Schulze-Tanzil G, de la Motte D, Scheffer S, John T, Hansmann ML, Janiak A, et al. Effects of Urtica dioica on human prostate cell lines and tissues. Eur J Histochem. 2007;51(2):201–10.
  11. Nasri H, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Herbal medicines and renal injury: where is the gap? J Nephropharmacol. 2013;2(1):5–9.
  12. Baragi V, Potdar M, Ambure R, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and management through Ayurveda and Urtica dioica: A review. J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2021;6(5):170–8.
  13. Schöttner M, Gansser D, Spiteller G. Lignans from Urtica dioica and their metabolites bind to human sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Planta Med. 1997;63(6):529–32.
  14. Fiorito S, Epifano F, Palmisano R, Genovese S. Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(30):3530–7.
  15. Patel MP, Kerry R, Shah A. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant activity of Urtica dioica L. leaves. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2013;4(3):888–92.
  16. Akbari G, Pirmoradi Z, Naghibi S. Urtica dioica in the treatment of prostate disorders: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021; 264:113290.
  17. Furuya Y, Akashi T, Fuse H, Ichikawa T. LHRH agonist therapy with Urtica dioica extract for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2006;9(1):35–8.
  18. Safarinejad MR. Comparison of the efficacy of Urtica dioica and finasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(4):485–90.
  19. Martínez-González IJ, Esquivel-Alvarado D, Olivares-Corichi IM, Ortiz-Tello A, Reyes-Chilpa R. Effect of Urtica dioica extracts on testosterone levels in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020; 254:112700.
  20. Koch AK, Steenkamp V. Use of Urtica dioica in complementary and alternative therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. S Afr J Sci. 2009;105(5–6):167–70.
  21. Wetherilt H. Phytotherapeutic agents in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparison between Urtica dioica and Serenoa repens. Eur J Integr Med. 2021;8(5):450–9.
  22. Hevesi Tóth B, Szabó P, Csupor D. Clinical benefits of nettle in the treatment of BPH: A review of randomized clinical trials. Int J Urol Nurs. 2020;14(1):12–20.
  23. Nahata A. Urtica dioica L.: A boon to mankind and an overview of its phytopharmacological potential. J Tradit Complement Med. 2013;3(4):221–8.
  24. Gunaherath GMK, Gunatilaka AAL, Kinghorn AD. Phytochemical constituents of Urtica dioica with potential in prostate cancer chemoprevention. Phytochem Rev. 2012;11(3):349–64.
  25. Bombardelli E, Morazzoni P. Urtica dioica L. (stinging nettle): an overview of pharmacology and clinical efficacy. Phytomedicine. 2000;7(2):137–51.
  26. Amiri H, Mirmoeini SK. A review of Urtica dioica and its pharmacological benefits for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Herb Med. 2017;11(4):12–21.
  27. Pytel YA, Clark RJ. Phytotherapeutic agents in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms: Urtica dioica and Pygeum africanum. BJU Int. 2005;96(2):117–20.
  28. Leu C, Hofmann M, Wolffram S, Egger M, Suess M. Clinical trial of a Urtica dioica extract in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: serum PSA and testosterone levels. Phytomedicine. 2006;13(3):139–43.
  29. Ali SI, Abbas N. Effectiveness of Urtica dioica in BPH-induced patients: randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2021;10(3):271–6.
  30. Go??biewska M, J?drzejczak P, Kwa?niewska A, Wieczorek K. The effectiveness of Urtica dioica in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis: a review of evidence. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24(4):141–9.
  31. Rios JL, Andujar I, Giner RM, Recio MC. Review of natural products with anti-inflammatory properties in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Urtica dioica at the forefront. Fitoterapia. 2012;83(3):602–10.
  32. Patel RM, Savjani JK. Medicinal plants with potential to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pharm Biol. 2015;53(3):402–12.
  33. Verma H, Prajapati PK. Anti-androgenic potential of Urtica dioica and its role in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Herb Med. 2012;1(1):16–22.
  34. Chrubasik-Hausmann S, Vlachojannis J, Chrubasik C. A systematic review on the combined effects of Urtica dioica and Pygeum africanum in patients with BPH. Planta Med. 2016;82(9–10):831–41.
  35. Franz H. Current concepts of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia with phytotherapeutic agents. World J Urol. 1998;16(2):87–93.
  36. Mamedov N, Craker LE. Medicinal plants used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Russia and Central Asia. J Herbs Spices Med Plants. 2002;9(1–2):119–29.
  37. Picon M, Teijón JM, Scavone C, Alvarez Y. Effect of Urtica dioica L. extract on prostatic hypertrophy in rats. J Pharm Pharmacogn Res. 2019;7(2):120–7.
  38. Magri V, Trinchieri A, Pozzi R, Restelli A, Marelli O. Treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia with Urtica dioica and Serenoa repens. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017;89(3):194–8.
  39. Ku?ma ?, Palka K. Urtica dioica in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Mechanisms and efficacy. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(2):2374–84.
  40. Kanbak G. Phytotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Phytosci. 2019;5(1):24.
  41. Busato MA, Matos AP, Schenkel EP. Role of Urtica dioica and Prunus africanum in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(1):35–41.
  42. Nawaz S, Abbas S. Urtica dioica and BPH: effects on prostatic enlargement in elderly patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(5):1147–52.
  43. Preuss HG, Marcusen C. Therapeutic perspectives of Urtica dioica and its extracts in BPH management. Curr Urol. 2007;2(4):217–24.
  44. Lopatkin N, Sivkov A, Walther C, Schlafke S, Engelmann U. Combined sabal and Urtica dioica extracts versus finasteride in men with early-stage BPH: a comparative study. Urologiia. 2005;12(3):28–36.
  45. Baragatti B, Cocchi P, Fornarini G. The efficacy of a Urtica dioica extract in relieving symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Phytother Res. 2004;18(3):202–7.
  46. Medeiros MS, Oliveira AP. Therapeutic potential of Urtica dioica in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a pharmacological review. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2021;31(3):421–34.
  47. Sarna S, Sarma S. Phytotherapeutics in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an alternative medicine overview. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(3):481–93.
  48. Brawley OW, Kucuk O. Nettle root in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2018;5(2):123–6.
  49. De Sena TR, Figueiredo CA. Role of Urtica dioica and its therapeutic applications in urology. Arch Esp Urol. 2020;73(8):714–20.
  50. Zhang Y, Bao C. Clinical studies on the use of herbal extracts in BPH treatment: focus on Urtica dioica and Serenoa repens. J Med Plants Res. 2014;8(6):312–20.
  51. Gupta SK, Raghunath C. Urtica dioica: Natural androgen receptor inhibitors in prostate diseases. Indian J Urol. 2010;17(4):329–35.
  52. Fashandi A, Zarei S. Clinical benefits of Urtica dioica in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review. J Herb Med. 2015;7(3):128–34.
  53. Hansen R, Biller J. The role of Urtica dioica in the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Fitoterapia. 2013;6(2):45–51.
  54. Yoon BI, Kim HL. Potential of Urtica dioica in treatment of BPH-induced bladder dysfunction. Int Neurourol J. 2017;21(4):245–52.
  55. Hong H, Kim JJ. Herbal agents for benign prostatic hyperplasia: focus on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). Complement Ther Med. 2018;41(3):214–20.
  56. Isik H, Isik A. Efficacy of Urtica dioica extract in BPH patients: A clinical trial. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(5):365–71.
  57. Ramos E, Rodriguez L. Anti-inflammatory effect of Urtica dioica in chronic prostatic conditions. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;128(5):125–32.
  58. Javanmardi F, Kordi R. BPH treatment using nettle: A randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1829–34.
  59. Lust G, Greenberg L. Effectiveness of nettle root extract in managing BPH symptoms. Phytomedicine. 2015;13(4):27–32.
  60. Eskelinen H, Nyberg A. Nettle-based therapies for prostate conditions: literature review. Altern Ther Health Med. 2013;6(4):24–9.

Photo
Abhilash Kutlehria
Corresponding author

Minerva College of Pharmacy, Indora, Kangra, HP

Photo
Kapil Kumar Verma
Co-author

Minerva College of Pharmacy, Indora, Kangra, HP

Photo
Rohit Sharma
Co-author

Minerva College of Pharmacy, Indora, Kangra, HP

Rohit Sharma*, Abhilash Kutlehria, Kapil Kumar Verma, Urtica Dioica: In Used To Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 9, 943-955. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13788549

More related articles
Mechanism and Potentialities of Photothermal thera...
Wasif Rao, Bishal Singh, Asif , Robin Kumar, ...
Male And Female Infertility Which Cause Child Birt...
Koshish Gabhane, Aman S. Maharaj, Ankita S. Kadu, Siya V. Chawan,...
A Review On: Formulation And Estimation Of Topical...
Pawar Chaitanya Vidyasagar, Nishant V. Pote, Munjaji M. Mule, Roh...
Studies On Effect Of Supplementation Of Ascorbic Acid On Post Thaw Sperm Acrosom...
Nagendra Singh , Akhil Patel , Suresh Kumar , Megha Pande , Vijay Singh , R.A. Siddique , ...
Formulation, Evaluation Of Antifungal Cream Form Pongamia Pinnata...
Shivaji Balu Pujari, Khushi Krushna Rathod, Rutuja Sunil Kawale , ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Polyherbal Cream In Acne Treatment...
Shraddha Tandale , Shrikant Gosavi , Mohini suryawanshi , Pooja Wankhede , ...
Related Articles
Nanosponges: A Modern Formulation Approach In Drug Delivery System...
Siddhi J. Rakibe, Kanchan B. Benkule, Janhvi D. Borse, Ashish Y. Pawar, ...
Nanoliposomes as Potential Carriers in Transdermal Patches...
Kanika, Chinu Kumari, Dev Prakash Dahiya, Rahul Sharma, Nikhil Rana, Vishakha Patial, ...
Development And Optimization of Ranitidine HCL Press Coated Osmotic Floating Tab...
A. Lakshmi Usha, A. V. S. Bhavani, HanumanthuSri Gayatri, Sonali Padhi, Lahari Medikonda, Konkyana T...
More related articles
Male And Female Infertility Which Cause Child Birth Problem...
Koshish Gabhane, Aman S. Maharaj, Ankita S. Kadu, Siya V. Chawan, Suyog R. Ambadkar, ...
A Review On: Formulation And Estimation Of Topical Emulgel...
Pawar Chaitanya Vidyasagar, Nishant V. Pote, Munjaji M. Mule, Rohini B. Chougale, Ms. Wale R.R, ...
Male And Female Infertility Which Cause Child Birth Problem...
Koshish Gabhane, Aman S. Maharaj, Ankita S. Kadu, Siya V. Chawan, Suyog R. Ambadkar, ...
A Review On: Formulation And Estimation Of Topical Emulgel...
Pawar Chaitanya Vidyasagar, Nishant V. Pote, Munjaji M. Mule, Rohini B. Chougale, Ms. Wale R.R, ...