View Article

Abstract

Accurate staging is crucial for determining the best treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Early-stage NSCLC is usually treated with surgery. For locally advanced NSCLC, a combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and sometimes surgery is used. In metastatic NSCLC, chemotherapy has been proven to improve survival and quality of life. This discussion will cover the various surgical, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment options, as well as the benefits of combining these therapies for different stages of NSCLC.

Keywords

Evidenced based medicine, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, screening, chemotherapy, targeted therapy.

Introduction

Proof using our professional knowledge and the particular values and circumstances of each patient A method of providing healthcare that stresses the integration of the best available scientific evidence with clinical knowledge and patient values is known as evidence-based medicine, or EBM. Critically evaluated and current data from carefully planned research studies informs medical decisions and practices in evidence-based medicine.  Enhancing the standard of patient care is the goal of this approach. by making certain that scientific proof of the efficacy of medical interventions, therapies, and diagnostic techniques is used. Evidence-based medical practitioners evaluate scientific literature in a methodical manner, taking into account the validity, reliability, and applicability of research in order to make well-informed decisions regarding patient care. This method seeks to strike a compromise between patient preferences and clinical experience, acknowledging their significance and aiming for the best.

    1. Available Evidence.

In summary, evidence-based medicine gives medical personnel a methodical and exacting framework to use when making judgments, which eventually improves the general efficacy and caliber of medical practice.

1.2. History:

The term "scientific medicine" was first used in 1990 by Dr. Gordon Guyatt, a young coordinator at McMaster University's Internal Medicine Residency. This method built on the work of his mentor, Dr. David Sackett, by employing critical appraisal techniques to teach medicine at the bedside. Nonetheless, his coworkers disapproved of the notion that contemporary clinical judgments might not be wholly scientific. Guyatt devised a new name for the residency program's core curriculum in order to address this:

 "Medicine Based on Evidence" (EBM). An editorial from the ACP Journal Club in 1991 described this trend. Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), which was developed in 1991, was a groundbreaking approach that drew from years of cross-disciplinary collaboration. Clinical epidemiology, biomedical informatics, and evidence-based guidelines are only a few of the many topics covered by EBM. One important topic will be briefly discussed in this essay: the development of clinical epidemiology and related.

1.3. Integration into clinical practice.

The foundations of EBM can be found in the identification of the shortcomings of conventional healthcare practices in the US and their effects on the cost and quality of patient attention. A paradigm change was brought about by the requirement for more clarity in decision-making. Clinical practice was traditionally viewed as the "art of medicine," depending on the knowledge and judgment of experts. Rarely were scientific methods and statistical analysis used, which are typical in epidemiology and biomedical research. Medical resistance to implementing these technologies was rooted in political mistrust and historical precedent. Global events in the 1960s, however, cleared the path for EBM. The Growing awareness of the limitations in standard clinical approaches prompted a reconsideration of incorporating scientific methodologies. EBM essentially developed as a result of efforts to bring scientific rigor to clinical decision-making, rather than as a stand-alone concept in 1991. Overcoming historical barriers, changing viewpoints, and embracing the insights gained from diverse disciplines worldwide were all part of the voyage. This change signaled a turning point in medical practice by putting an emphasis on facts and evidence in addition to clinical knowledge. Having received training at Harvard Medical School, Stanford Medical Center, and Johns Hopkins University, Suzanne and Robert Fletcher saw a problem in medicine at the beginning of the 1960s. Clinical practice and biological science have not always been compatible. Uncontrolled cellular growth brought on by genetic and epigenetic changes is a hallmark of the diverse group of disorders known as cancer. By interfering with regulatory processes, these alterations allow cells to avoid growth inhibition, withstand apoptosis, and spread. DNA repair deficiencies (e.g., *BRCA1/2*), tumor suppressor gene inactivation (e.g., *TP53*), and oncogene activation (e.g., *RAS*) are important drivers. Risk factors include lifestyle choices (e.g., nutrition, lack of physical exercise), heredity, and environmental exposures (e.g., smoke, UV radiation). Both benign (localized) and malignant (invasive, metastatic) tumor are possible.[1,2]. Keeping up with the latest advancements in medical publications can be challenging for clinicians. For instance, a general practitioner should read 19 articles daily, but we know that many of them only have an hour to devote to this task. When a doctor spends the majority of their working hours reviewing all published articles and studies, they are experiencing academic isolation, often known as the armchair phenomenon. However, even if the physicians had the time to read them all, they would not have enough time to assess the study's worth, methodology, results, and transparency. Given his restricted time, the doctor must so read carefully and choose wisely what he reads and what he does not read.[3] Due to its inherent complexity, family medicine is characterized by a large percentage of poorly differentiated issues that intersect with biological, psychological, and social variables. Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), which dates back to the second half of the 1800s, refers to the deliberate and prudent application of the best available scientific data when deciding how best to treat each patient. The diligent, clear, prudent, and rational application of the best available evidence when making choices on a patient's treatment is known as evidence-based medicine. Randomized controlled clinical studies with a large sample size that demonstrate the efficacy of several medications as well as the drawbacks and ineffectiveness of others as compared to the best available treatment are thought to provide the finest scientific evidence.[4] In evidence-based medicine, patient care necessitates the acquisition of clinically significant knowledge over a lifetime of self-directed, problem-based learning. PAPER on treatments, diagnosis, prognosis, and other clinical and medical matters. According to EBM, you should focus your reading on topics pertaining to particular patient problems rather than constantly searching through the contents of hundreds of publications for intriguing research. It might be more effective to create clinical questions first, then search up-to-date databases to stay up to date with the research. In evidence-based medicine, "the abstract activity of reading and evaluating the literature is transformed into the practical process of applying the literature to benefit individual patients while simultaneously broadening the clinician's knowledge base." A "cookbook" approach to medicine is not evidence-based medicine. It cannot lead to slavish, cookbook approaches to individual patient treatment since it necessitates a bottom-up strategy that incorporates the best available external evidence with clinical skill and patient preferences. Individual clinical expertise determines whether or not external clinical evidence applies to a certain patient and, if it does, how it should be incorporated into a therapeutic decision. External clinical evidence can support this knowledge, but it can never completely replace it. Comparably, when determining if and how an external guideline fits the patient's clinical state, situation, and preferences—and, thus, whether it should be applied—it must be combined with individual professional competence. Advocates of evidence-based medicine will join clinicians who are afraid of top-down directives at the barricades.[5] Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) plays a vital role in lung cancer treatment because it can maximize results by combining the best available clinical research, professional knowledge, and patient values.

1.3.1. Diagnosis and Molecular Profiling

  • EBM ensures precision in diagnosing and subtyping lung cancer, which is critical for personalized therapy.  
  • Histopathological and Molecular Subtyping: 

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) require distinct treatments. Molecular profiling (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, *PD-L1*) guides targeted therapy selection.  

  • Biomarker Testing:  

-  EGFR mutations occur in ~15% of NSCLC patients in Western populations and up to 50% in Asian populations. Testing for these mutations is standard for first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).[6]

  • Imaging Standards:  
  • PET-CT and brain MRI are evidence-based tools for accurate staging, reducing unnecessary surgeries.

1.3.2. Treatment Selection  

EBM drives therapy choices based on clinical trial data and biomarker evidence.  

A. Targeted Therapies  

  • EGFR Inhibitors:  
  • Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, improved progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy in the phase III FLAURA trial for untreated *EGFR*-mutant NSCLC.[7]
  • ALK Inhibitors:  
  • Alectinib demonstrated superior PFS over crizotinib in the ALEX trial for  ALK -rearranged NSCLC.

B. Immunotherapy:

  • PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors:  

  - Pembrolizumab became a first-line standard for PD-L1-high (≥50%) NSCLC after the KEYNOTE-024 trial showed superior overall survival (OS) vs. chemotherapy. [8]

  • Combination Chemo-Immunotherapy:  
  • The KEYNOTE-189 trial established pembrolizumab + pemetrexed-platinum as a standard for non-squamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 status.  

C. Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy: 

  • The ADAURA trial showed osiertinib improves disease-free survival in resected *EGFR*-mutant NSCLC.[9]  

D. Adaptive and Personalized Therapy

  • EBM supports dynamic treatment adjustments based on evolving evidence.  
  • Overcoming Resistance:  

Osimertinib is standard for *EGFR T790M*-mediated resistance, as shown in the AURA3 trial.  

1.4. Guideline Development and Standardization

EBM synthesizes evidence into clinical guidelines to ensure consistency in care.  

  • NCCN Guidelines:  
  • Regularly updated recommendations for biomarker testing (e.g., *EGFR*, *ALK*, *ROS1*, *RET*, *MET*, *HER2*) and therapy selection.  

ESMO Guidelines:  

  • Evidence-based algorithms for stage-specific management, including
  • immunotherapy and targeted therapy.[10]  

1.5.  Emerging Therapies and Trials:

EBM accelerates the adoption of novel therapies validated by clinical trials.  

  • KRAS G12C Inhibitors:  
  • Sotorasib (Code BreaK 100 trial) and adagrasib (KRYSTAL-1 trial) are FDA-approved for *KRAS G12C*-mutant NSCLC. 

1.6. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs):  

  • Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DESTINY-Lung01 trial) shows efficacy in *HER2*-mutant NSCLC.  

1.7. Challenges and Future Directions:

-  Access to Biomarker Testing:  

- Disparities in molecular testing persist globally, limiting personalized therapy.  

Tumor Heterogeneity:  

- Clonal evolution and resistance mechanisms necessitate ongoing research.[11]

Fig:01

Table:01

 

Male

Female

Both Sex

Population

 

 

3972735747

 

3912335034

788507081

Incidence

 

Number Of New Cancer Case

10311610

96649889

19978499

Age Standardized Incidence Rate

212.

186

196

Resk Of Development of Cancer Before The Age Of 75 Years

21

18

20

Top 3 Leading Cancer

Lungs Prosted

Colorectum

Brest Luns Colorectum

Lungs Brest

Colorectum

Mortality

 

Number Of Cancer Death

5430284

4313538

9743832

Age Standard Mortility Rate

109

76

91

Resk Of Deaying Of Cancer Befor The Age Of 75 Year

11

08

09

Top 3 Leading Cancer

Lungs Liver

Colorectum

Best Lungs Colorectum

Lungs Colorectum Liver

Prevelance

 

5 Year Prevelent Case

25747272

27756915

53503187

2. Lung cancer in India

2.1. Current status and promising strategies

Among the world's biggest causes of mortality is lung cancer. It is a significant issue in Indian healthcare as well. On February 20, 2016, the following results were found when searching for "lung cancer India" online. There were 43,80,000 results from Google, 1,77,000 Scholarly articles, and 2592 papers on the nlm.nih.gov website in the PubMed Medline database. Figure 1 lists the Indian lung cancer papers that were cited in PubMed. The fact that the medical profession as a whole and oncologists in particular are consistently adding to the body of information regarding lung cancer is encouraging.[12]

The number of publications doubled from 42 in 2004 to 2006 and then reached a peak of 407 in 2014, over 10 times the number in just ten years. The impact this data is having globally is even more significant. Some of the pieces from India have citation indexes that are comparable to those of renowned periodicals, which is quite astounding.  This can be attributed to some original research that included the largest series of lung cancer patients from India, demonstrated pharmacogenomic differences in any cancer for the first time in history, and showed that choosing one of the standards of care options can be customized to maximize the outcome based on previously unidentified criteria.

Nevertheless, other papers compare the characteristics and results of patients of Asian descent, including those from India, and show that patients with advanced lung cancer who receive treatment from medical oncologists rather than other oncologists or healthcare providers had a higher chance of survival.[13] The public and private sectors of India's healthcare system coexist. For those with low incomes, the public health system offers free or heavily discounted medical treatment. Nonetheless, India's overall health care spending (including public and out-of-pocket) as a proportion of GDP is low (3.6% of GDP) in comparison to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's average of 8.8% of GDP in 2018. Health insurance coverage is also inadequate. Fewer than 28.7% of families had any regular member insured by any health insurance plan, according to the National Family Health Survey 2015–2016 (National Family Health Survey-4; http://rchiips.org/nfhs/index.shtml) (28.2% in urban areas and 28.9% in rural one). In order to give 500 million people free access to healthcare, the government recently launched the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (https://pmjay.gov.in), which provides insurance coverage of 5 lakh rupees per family annually for secondary and tertiary healthcare. India ranks third globally in terms of tobacco production and consumption. In India, tobacco consumption is estimated to be 28.6%. 267 million tobacco users are expected to be in the nation (Global Adult Tobacco Survey-2 [GATS]-2 2016–2017: India information sheet; http://gatsatlas.org), with 42.4% of males and 14.2% of women smokers. In GATS-2 (2016–2017), the prevalence of tobacco usage has significantly decreased in comparison to GATS-1 (2009–2010). In 2007 and 2008, the Indian government launched. National Tobacco Control Program (http://ntcp.nhp.gov.in) to increase public awareness of the harmful effects of tobacco, regulate tobacco production and consumption, enact and enforce the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Product Act, support and strengthen tobacco cessation services, and encourage the successful application of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control's strategies. 612 districts across are currently using this program.[14]

3. Epidemiology

 The worldwide burden In 2020, there were approximately 10.3 million new cases and 10 million deaths globally (WHO, 2020).

3.1. Common Cancers: Prostate, colorectal, stomach, lung, and breast cancers are the most common. Geographic variance is present; for example, HPV causes cervical cancer to be more common in low-resource areas.

3.2. Disparities: While low-income areas have late diagnosis and infection-related cancers (e.g., HBV, *H. pylori*), high-income nations report higher incidence but lower mortality (early detection/treatment availability).

3.3. Trends: Urbanization, aging populations, and changes in lifestyle (such as smoking and obesity) are all associated with an increasing incidence.[15]

Squamous and small cell lung cancers, which are closely linked to tobacco use, used to dominate the epidemiology of lung cancer in India. However, adenocarcinoma eventually overtook them as the most common histologic type. This change in histologic profile has mostly taken place in the last ten years, and it has trailed behind the change seen in industrialized nations in this regard.  The reason for this "time lag" has been attributed to the fact that, in India, "bidi," or handmade tobacco smoking products, which are mainly based on cottage industries, have been and still are the most popular kind of smoking product. This is in contrast to the more regulated and mechanized cigarette manufacturing process, which has seen little change over time (similar to the latter, which has been marketed for a long time with low nicotine content and filtered cigarettes). Furthermore, the reported prevalence of NSCLC-not otherwise specified (undifferentiated NSCLC) subtype has decreased as a result of improvements in histologic typing by reporting pathologists linked to increased use of immunochemistry (IHC). The majority of cases are classified as non-squamous NSCLC adenocarcinoma. enumerates the significant epidemiologic research conducted on lung cancer in India during the previous thirty years. The majority of lung cancer patients in India had both locally progressed and metastatic illness upon presentation.[16]

Table:02 Demographic and Key Stastics of India

Demographic Variable

Numerical Value

Total population

1.38 billion

Urban population

34.5%

Life expectancy

70.42 y

Languages

216

Sex ratio

924 females per 1000 males

Nominal GDP

$3.202 trillion

PPP

$11.33 trillion

Total health care expenditure

3.6% of GDP

Health insurance coverage

20% of women and 23% of men

Doctor-population ratio

1:1456 (WHO recommendation 1:1000)

Noncommunicable diseases

60% of all deaths

Tobacco use

28.6% of adults

Table:03

Globocan India statistics 2018

Number of new cancer cases

1.16 million

Cancer deaths

784,821

Number of prevalent cancer cases (5-y)

2.26 million

Lung cancer

5.9% of all cancer cases (fourth most common)

Lung cancer incidence

67,795

Lung cancer mortality

63,475 (8.1% of all cancer deaths)

 

Table:04

Projected incidence, 2020S2

 

All sites

1,392,179

Males

679,421

Females

712,758

Lung cancer

712,758

Males

71,788

Females

26,490

4. CLASSIFICATION OF CANCERS

4.1. Carcinomas (Cancers of Epithelial Cells)

  • Adenocarcinoma – Cancer that forms in glandular cells (e.g., lung, breast, prostate, pancreas).
  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma – Affects squamous cells (e.g., skin, esophagus , lungs).
  • Basal Cell Carcinoma – A common skin cancer.
  • Transitional Cell Carcinoma – Affects the urinary system (e.g., bladder cancer).[17]

4.2. Sarcomas (Cancers of Connective Tissues)

  • Osteosarcoma – Bone cancer.
  • Chondrosarcoma – Cartilage cancer.
  • Liposarcoma – Fat tissue cancer.
  • Leiomyosarcoma – Smooth muscle cancer.

4.3. Leukemia (Blood Cancers)

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

4.4. Lymphomas (Cancer of Lymphatic System)

  • Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)

4.5. Brain and Spinal Cord Tumor

  • Gliomas – Brain cancer affecting glial cells.
  • Meningiomas – Cancer of the meninges (brain/spinal cord covering).

4.6. Other Notable Cancers

  • Melanoma – Skin cancer that originates in melanocytes.
  • Multiple Myeloma – Cancer of plasma cells in the bone marrow.
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor – Affect hormone-producing cells.

Germ Cell Tumor– Cancer in reproductive cells (e.g., testicular and ovarian cancer).[18]

Fig:02

5.Pathology:

6.Investigation Of Disease

 The most popular methods for identifying lung cancer are transthoracic sampling and flexible bronchoscopy. While lesions in the peripheral third of the thorax are often addressed trans thoracically, those in the central third are typically accessed bronchoscopically. Over the last ten years, bronchoscopy services have expanded significantly in India, however they appear to be concentrated in large cities.12- Numerous pulmonologists provide advanced bronchoscopic methods, including endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS).[19] Interventional radiologists typically use imaging guidance (CT or ultrasound) when doing transthoracic sampling. Less than 1% of Indian hospitals now have a special setup for interventional radiology, though.13 Depending on patient-specific characteristics and the level of competence available, either modality can access lesions in the middle part of the chest. These bronchoscopy methods include electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, virtual bronchoscopic avigation, radial EBUS, and ultrathin bronchoscopy for sampling peripheral lesions. Nevertheless, these bronchoscopic methods are not commonly accessible. PET-guided biopsy has become a viable method for transthoracic sampling in more recent times.14. It is noteworthy that the metabolic characterisation offered by PET-CT can make it possible to target live tissue when sampling, increasing the diagnostic yield.[20] According to preliminary findings, a diagnosis might be made for all patients following a PET-CT-guided biopsy if the results of prior invasive sample were unclear for thoracic lesions.14. In cases with advanced illness, it is crucial to ensure sufficient samples for histologic and molecular characterization. However, this might be difficult at smaller centers due to a lack of experience. Detecting driver mutations using liquid biopsy might be useful in these circumstances when sufficient tissue is not available for further analysis. In order to determine the local and distant extent of the illness, patients with lung cancer typically undergo non-invasive imaging staging. Particularly for individuals with serious illness, non-invasive staging is crucial. The most reliable non invasive staging technique for lung cancer is a whole-body PET-CT scan. A radionuclide bone scan is used in conjunction with a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen (containing the liver and adrenal glands) for staging in centers where PET-CT is not easily accessible.[21] Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is typically included of the staging evaluation since PET-CT is not sensitive enough for brain metastases. When evaluating patients who are not surgical candidates, the majority of Indian centers limit the staging examination to a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen. If the clinical evaluation does not indicate metastatic illness, PET-CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain are not typically performed. Mediastinal staging is usually invasive for the majority of patients with resectable illness.

Because of the potential for false-positive results, invasive mediastinal staging is typically used to confirm any imaging indications of nodal involvement. It is particularly important to provide histological proof of nodal involvement in nations like India where granulomatous illnesses, like TB, are widespread. A limited percentage of patients with peripheral stage IA illness who show no signs of hilar or mediastinal involvement on PET-CT often do not require invasive mediastinal staging. [22] In India, the practice varies. Because the negative predictive value of a PET-CT is not 100%, some centers choose to undertake invasive mediastinal staging in all patients with resectable disease even if the PET-CT is negative. However, other centers would rather adopt a policy that limits the use of invasive mediastinal staging to individuals in whom PETCT shows suspicion of N3 illness, thereby promoting liberal neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in subjects with any N2 disease on PET-CT. The methods for invasive mediastinal staging include mediastinoscopy and endosonographic procedures (EBUS with or without endoscopic ultrasonography). The widely acknowledged method for invasive mediastinal staging is mediastinoscopy. When opposed to endosonographic procedures, mediastinoscopy delivers a greater volume of tissue for further analysis and presents the possibility of a full lymphadenectomy, particularly when video aided. It is constrained, nonetheless, by the scarcity of skilled thoracic surgeons and the possibility of higher morbidity as compared to endosonographic treatments. However, the morbidity and mortality linked to mediastinoscopy are often insignificant in seasoned centers. Research suggests that endoscopic operations are less likely to result in complications and have a comparable yield to mediastinoscopy. Nonetheless, some centers adopt a negative endoscopic mediastinal staging in conjunction with mediastinoscopy due to ongoing concerns about the increased false negative rate of endosonographic procedures as compared to mediastinoscopy. In other centers, a negative endoscopic mediastinal staging is followed immediately by surgery.[23]

7.Screening Techniques:

• Flexible bronchoscopy and transthoracic sampling are the two methods most frequently employed to diagnose lung cancer.
• Transthoracic sampling is utilized for peripheral lesions, whereas bronchoscopy is recommended for core thoracic lesions.
• Depending on patient-specific characteristics and available competence, either approach can be used to reach middle thoracic lesions. [24]

? 7.1. Bronchoscopic Techniques:

  • Advanced techniques include endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), radial EBUS, virtual bronchoscopic navigation, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and ultrathin bronchoscopy.
  • These techniques improve diagnostic yield but are not widely available in India.[25,26]

? 7.2. Transthoracic Sampling:

  • Performed under ultrasound or CT guidance by interventional radiologists.
  • PET-CT guided biopsy is emerging as a promising method, offering improved diagnostic yield.

? 7.3. Non-Invasive Staging:

  • Whole-body PET-CT is the most accurate method for staging lung cancer.
  • In centers lacking PET-CT, a radionuclide bone scan and contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and upper abdomen are used.
  • MRI brain is often required for detecting brain metastases.

? 7.4. Invasive Mediastinal Staging:

  • Required in most patients with resectable disease to confirm nodal involvement.
  • Techniques include EBUS with or without endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and mediastinoscopy.[27]
  • Mediastinoscopy remains the gold standard but has limited availability due to a lack of trained thoracic surgeons.

? 7.5. Variability in Practice:

  • Some Indian centers perform invasive mediastinal staging in all resectable cases, while others rely on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for N2 disease seen on PET-CT.
  • Concerns exist about the false-negative rate of endoscopic mediastinal staging, leading some centers to follow it with mediastinoscopy.[28]

8.Triggering Factor

A. Tobacco Smoking

- Description: The leading cause of lung cancer, responsible for ~85% of cases.

- Mechanism: Carcinogens in tobacco smoke damage DNA in lung cells.

B. Second hand Smoke

- Description: Non-smokers exposed to tobacco smoke have a 20-30% increased risk. [29]

C. Occupational Exposures

- Asbestos: Increases risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma.

- Radon: A radioactive gas found in soil and buildings.

D. Air Pollution

- Description: Particulate matter (PM2.5) from vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions

E. Diet and Lifestyle

- Low Fruit/Vegetable Intake: Associated with increased risk.

- Alcohol Consumption: Heavy drinking may elevate risk. [30]

8.1. Non-Modifiable Risk Factors

A. Genetic Predisposition

- Family History: First-degree relatives with lung cancer increase risk.

- Inherited Mutations: Mutations in genes like *EGFR*, *KRAS*, or *TP53*.

B. Age

- Description: Risk increases significantly after age 50.

C. Gender

- Description: Historically higher in men, but rates in women are rising due to smoking trends.

D. Chronic Lung Disease

- COPD: Chronic inflammation increases cancer risk.

- Pulmonary Fibrosis: Scarring of lung tissue.

    1. Emerging Risk Factors
    •  Long-term effects are unclear, but some studies suggest potential harm.
    1. E-Cigarettes and Vaping

B. Infections - HIV: Increased risk due to immunosuppression. - Tuberculosis: Chronic inflammation and scarring.

9Intervention:

9.1. Alternative Therapy 

9.1.1. Surgery

By removing the tumor or a section of the lung, surgery can improve prognosis and possibly even cure localized lung cancer.
If the tumor is limited to one lung and the patient has sufficient lung function, a lobectomy (removal of a lung lobe) or pneumonectomy (removal of an entire lung) may be carried out. Patients with early-stage malignancies or those who are unable to undergo more involved surgery may benefit from segmentectomy, which involves removing a portion of a lobe. Some situations where the cancer is in a peripheral site may use wedge resection, which involves removing a small part of the lung tissue.[31,32]

9.1.2. Radiation Therapy

Patients who are unable to have surgery can benefit from radiation therapy, which can also be used to relieve symptoms or as part of a curative treatment plan that includes chemotherapy or surgery.
High-energy X-rays are delivered to the tumor by external beam radiation treatment (EBRT).

For patients who are not candidates for surgery or for early-stage, incurable cancers, stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT), a more accurate kind of radiation, is frequently utilized.
By employing protons rather of X-rays, proton therapy is a type of radiation that may help preserve healthy tissue surrounding malignancies. [33]

9.1.3. Palliative Care

Symptom relief and quality of life enhancement are the main goals of palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer or those who are not responding to curative treatment.
Pain management that reduces discomfort by non-pharmacological methods including physical therapy, acupuncture, or relaxation techniques. Breathing techniques and pulmonary rehabilitation to enhance respiratory function, particularly for people with diminished lung function or shortness of breath
Nutritional assistance through dietary guidance and weight-loss management techniques, which are frequent in patients with lung cancer.[34]

9.1.4. Physical Therapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Maintaining physical function, strength, and mobility—particularly after surgery or in advanced stages of disease—requires physical therapy. Programs for pulmonary rehabilitation are especially designed to improve quality of life, lessen dyspnea, and improve lung function.
Exercise training enhances physical endurance and lessens weariness. Patients can increase oxygenation and control dyspnea by using breathing techniques including pursed-lip breathing and diaphragmatic breathing instruction on symptom management, including ways to save energy and increase physical capability. [35]

9.1.5. Nutritional Therapy

 Malnutrition is a common problem in lung cancer patients due to loss of appetite, difficulty swallowing, or the effects of the cancer itself. Nutritional therapy aims to maintain optimal weight, prevent cachexia (wasting), and improve patient strength and overall health

Dietitians work to provide high-calorie, high-protein foods and manage side effects of treatment such as nausea or taste changes.

In some cases, enteral nutrition (tube feeding) or parenteral nutrition (IV feeding) may be required.

9.1.6. Psychosocial Support

The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer can have a serious negative effect on mental health, increasing stress, anxiety, and depression. Patients can better handle their diagnosis and treatment with psychological support from mental health providers, support groups, and counseling.
It has been demonstrated that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) helps cancer patients with their anxiety and depression symptoms. [36,37]

Relaxation methods and mindfulness meditation may aid in stress management and enhance mental health.

9.1.7. Complementary and Alternative Therapies

To control pain, lessen symptoms, or deal with stress, some patients could look for complementary therapies. These consist of: Acupuncture for weariness, nausea, and discomfort. massage treatment to promote relaxation and ease tense muscles.
Yoga and meditation can help you feel less stressed, more flexible, and less anxious.
Aromatherapy for relaxation and mood enhancement.  It is important to remember that although complementary therapies could help with symptoms, they should only be used sparingly and in addition to conventional treatments, not in substitute of them. [38,39]

10. Drug Therapy

Table 05. Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer

Drug

Type of Agent

Major Adverse Effects

Comments

Platinum agents

 

 

 

Cisplatin (Platinol)

Atypical alkylator

Nausea and vomiting (common),† nephrotoxicity,

ototoxicity, neuropathy, myelosuppression

(mild), electrolyte wasting

(potassium and magnesium)

Hydration required before and after

administration

Carboplatin (Paraplatin)

Atypical alkylator

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting

(mild), neurotoxicity (rare), nephrotoxicity

(rare

Dose usually determined by area under

the curve, taking renal function into

account with use of the Calvert formula

Nonplatinum agents

 

 

 

Etoposide (VePesid)

Topoisomerase II

inhibitor

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting,

stomatitis, diarrhea

Stomatitis and diarrhea rare with normal

dose

Topotecan (Hycamptin

Topoisomerase I

inhibitor

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting,

diarrhea, headache

Increased monitoring of liver function

necessary

Irinotecan (Camptosar)

Topoisomerase I

inhibitor

Myelosuppression, † diarrhea, nausea and

vomiting

------------

Gemcitabine (Gemzar)

Antimetabolite

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting,

diarrhea, edema, influenza-like syndrome

Increased monitoring of liver function

necessary

Paclitaxel (Taxol)

Microtubule

inhibitor

Myelosuppression, † mucositis, peripheral

neuropathy, hypersensitivity reaction,

nausea and vomiting

Requires pretreatment with dexamethasone,

diphenhydramine hydrochloride, ranitidine

Docetaxel (Taxotere)

Microtubule

inhibitor

Myelosuppression   ,† edema and fluid retention,

mucositis, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting

Requires treatment with dexamethasone

before, during, and after infusion

Vinorelbine (Navelbine)

Microtubule

inhibitor

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting

Mild vesicant

Vincristine (Oncovin)

Microtubule

inhibitor

Neuropathy, † constipation

Vesicant

Doxorubicin

(Adriamycin)

Anthracycline

antibiotic

Myelosuppression, † cardiomyopathy, nausea

and vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis

Cardiotoxic effects occur with cumulative

doses of more than 375 mg/m

2

of body surface

area; potent vesicant; precautions

against extravasation necessary

Cyclophosphamide

(Cytoxan)

Alkylating agent

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting,

hemorrhagic cystitis

Hemorrhagic cystitis rare with standard

doses

Ifosfamide (Ifex)

Alkylating agent

Myelosuppression, † nausea and vomiting,

hemorrhagic cystitis, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity

Mesna given to prevent Hemorrhagic

cystitis

11. Adverse Reaction

11. 1. Surgery

Common Side Effects:

-The place of the incision is painful.
-Breathlessness (caused by decreased lung capacity).
-Lung infection or pneumonia.
-Extended bleeding or air leaks  [40]

Long-term Risks:

-Prolonged discomfort or numbness.
- Decreased tolerance to exercise

11. 2. Radiation Therapy

Acute Side Effects:

-Weariness.
- Skin discomfort (such as peeling or redness).
-Esophagitis, or difficult swallowing [41]

Long-term Risks:

- Pneumonia from radiation (inflammation of the lung).
-The scarring of lung tissue is known as pulmonary fibrosis.
-Damage to the heart (should radiation strike the chest).

11.3. Chemotherapy

Common Side Effects:

- feeling queasy or throwing up.
Weariness and hair loss.
Myelosuppression, or decreased neutrophil numbers [42]

Serious Risks:

- Neuropathy (nerve damage).

- Kidney or liver damage.

- Increased infection risk (due to immunosuppression).[43,44]

11.4. Targeted Therapy (e.g., EGFR, ALK inhibitors)

Common Side Effects:

- Skin rash (e.g., acneiform eruptions with EGFR inhibitors).

- Diarrhea.

- Fatigue.

Serious Risks:

- Interstitial lung disease (ILD).

- Cardiac toxicity (e.g., QT prolongation with some ALK inhibitors) [45,46]

11.5. Immunotherapy (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors)

Common Side Effects:

- Fatigue.

- Skin rash.

- Diarrhea/colitis.

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs):

- Pneumonitis.

- Hepatitis.

- Thyroid dysfunction.

- Myocarditis (rare but severe). [47,48]

11.6. Combination Therapies

Synergistic Toxicity:

-Enhanced myelosuppression (chemotherapy + immunotherapy).

- Overlapping pneumonitis risk (radiation + immunotherapy).[49]

12. CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, the management and therapy of lung cancer greatly benefit from evidence-based medicine.  Patient outcomes have been greatly enhanced by recent developments in immunotherapies, targeted medicines, surgery, and screening procedures.  Personalized medicine and customized strategies are becoming more and more crucial in the treatment of lung cancer as research advances.  Healthcare providers can give patients with lung cancer the best care possible by remaining current with the most recent scientific discoveries and recommendations.

REFRENCES

        1. Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–24252.
        2. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, haynes RB. Evi-dence-based medicine: how to practice and teach. 2. ed.. Ed-in burgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 2000.
        3. The Jama Network. Evidence Based Medicine: An Oral History 2014 [December 2016]. http://ebm.jamanetwork.com.
        4. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). *Global Cancer Observatory*. https://gco.iarc.fr/
        5. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. *Cell, 144*(5), 646–674. 
        6. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en/dataviz/pie.
        7. Maši? I. Medicina baziranana dokazima. U: Porodi?na/ Obiteljska Medicina principii praksa, Avicena Sarajevo, 2007: 115-23.
        8. https://checkupcancer.com/what-are-the-different-types-of-cancer-and-how-are-they-diagnosed/
        9. Lung cancer types Classification and pathology of lung cancer https://www.surgonc.theclinics.com/article/S1055-3207(16)00005-3.
        10. https://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMra035536.
        11. Irsch et al. (2017). Lung cancer: Current therapies and new targeted treatments. *The Lancet,389(10066),299311.[DOI:10.1016/S01406736(16)309588](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8).
        12. Planchard et al. (2018). Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. *Annals of Oncology, 29(Suppl iv192–iv237. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy275](https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy275)
        13. Silvestri et al. (2013). Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer. *Chest, 143(5_suppl), e211S–e250S. [DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2355](https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2355) 
        14. Soria et al. (2018). Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. *NEJM, 378(2), 113–125. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713137](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713137)
        15. Peters et al. (2017). Alectinib vs. crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. *NEJM, 377(9), 829–838. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1704795).
        16. Reck et al. (2016). Pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy for PD-L1–positive NSCLC. *NEJM, 375(19), 1823–1833. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606774).
        17. Gandhi et al. (2018). Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. *NEJM, 378(22), 2078–2092. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005).
        18. Wu et al. (2020). Osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC. *NEJM, 383(18), 1711–1723. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027071](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2027071).
        19. Mok et al. (2017). Osimertinib vs. platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M+ NSCLC. *NEJM, 376(7), 629–640. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612674](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612674).
        20. Ettinger et al. (2023). NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC. *Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. [PMID: 36928390](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36928390/) .
        21. Hendriks et al. (2021). ESMO consensus guidelines for advanced NSCLC. *Annals of Oncology, 32(7), 881–895. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.012).
        22. Skoulidis et al. (2021). Sotorasib for KRAS p.G12C-mutant NSCLC. *NEJM, 384(25), 2371–2381. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103695](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2103695).
        23. Li et al. (2022). Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-mutant NSCLC. *NEJM, 386(3), 241–251. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112431](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2112431)
        24. Leighl et al. (2019). Access to precision oncology: Challenges and opportunities. *JCO PrecisionOncology,3,1 10.[DOI:10.1200/PO.19.00078](https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00078) .
        25. Miller, R. M., & Thomas, P. A. (2018). "Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer." Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(1), 1-13.
        26. Jang, S. H., & Lee, Y. K. (2020). "Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer." Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy, 16(2), 263-268
        27. Glover, L. (2017). "Palliative care in lung cancer: A review of the evidence." American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 34(4), 333-340.
        28. Spruit, M. A., et al. (2013). "Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease." European Respiratory Journal, 41(6), 1244-1252.
        29. Gosselink, R., et al. (2014). "Nutritional support in lung cancer." European Respiratory Journal, 43(1), 7-10
        30. Faller, H., et al. (2013). "Psychosocial interventions for cancer patients: A review of the evidence." Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(3), 108-114.
        31. Lee, J. H., et al. (2017). "Acupuncture for pain and fatigue in lung cancer patients: A systematic review." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 53(4), 746-755.
        32. https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article-abstract/59/7/611/5157990
        33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369213603025.
        34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369213602998.
        35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369213603037.
        36. Sung, H., et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates. *CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71*(3), 209–249. 
        37. American Cancer Society (ACS) - www.cancer.org
        38. National Cancer Institute (NCI) - www.cancer.gov
        39. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society - www.lls.org
        40. Mayo Clinic - www.mayoclinic.org
        41. National Brain Tumor Society - www.braintumor.org
        42. World Health Organization (WHO) - www.who.int
        43. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). (2023). NCCN Guidelines for Non-    Small Cell Lung Cancer. [NCCN Guidelines] (https://www.nccn.org).
        44. Simone, C. B., & Vapiwala, N. (2019). Radiation therapy for lung cancer: Toxicity and recent advances. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 69(1), 64–79. [DOI: 10.3322/caac.21561](https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21561.
        45. Gralla, R. J., et al. (1999). Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(9), 2971–2994. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2971](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2971)  .
        46. Shaw, A. T., et al. (2014). Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. New EnglandJournalofMedicine,371(21),19631971.[DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1406766](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1406766)
        47. Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2018). Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(17), 1714–1768. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385
        48. New England Journal of Medicine*, 377(20), 1919–1929. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709937).
        49. Alberg, A. J., Brock, M. V., & Samet, J. M. (2013). Epidemiology of lung cancer: Looking to the future. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(8), 1004–1010. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2293](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2293)
        50. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. (2018). Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Lung Cancer. [WCRF Report](https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/lung-cancer).

Reference

        1. Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–24252.
        2. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, haynes RB. Evi-dence-based medicine: how to practice and teach. 2. ed.. Ed-in burgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 2000.
        3. The Jama Network. Evidence Based Medicine: An Oral History 2014 [December 2016]. http://ebm.jamanetwork.com.
        4. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). *Global Cancer Observatory*. https://gco.iarc.fr/
        5. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. *Cell, 144*(5), 646–674. 
        6. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en/dataviz/pie.
        7. Maši? I. Medicina baziranana dokazima. U: Porodi?na/ Obiteljska Medicina principii praksa, Avicena Sarajevo, 2007: 115-23.
        8. https://checkupcancer.com/what-are-the-different-types-of-cancer-and-how-are-they-diagnosed/
        9. Lung cancer types Classification and pathology of lung cancer https://www.surgonc.theclinics.com/article/S1055-3207(16)00005-3.
        10. https://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMra035536.
        11. Irsch et al. (2017). Lung cancer: Current therapies and new targeted treatments. *The Lancet,389(10066),299311.[DOI:10.1016/S01406736(16)309588](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8).
        12. Planchard et al. (2018). Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. *Annals of Oncology, 29(Suppl iv192–iv237. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy275](https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy275)
        13. Silvestri et al. (2013). Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer. *Chest, 143(5_suppl), e211S–e250S. [DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2355](https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2355) 
        14. Soria et al. (2018). Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. *NEJM, 378(2), 113–125. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713137](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713137)
        15. Peters et al. (2017). Alectinib vs. crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. *NEJM, 377(9), 829–838. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1704795).
        16. Reck et al. (2016). Pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy for PD-L1–positive NSCLC. *NEJM, 375(19), 1823–1833. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606774).
        17. Gandhi et al. (2018). Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. *NEJM, 378(22), 2078–2092. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005).
        18. Wu et al. (2020). Osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC. *NEJM, 383(18), 1711–1723. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027071](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2027071).
        19. Mok et al. (2017). Osimertinib vs. platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M+ NSCLC. *NEJM, 376(7), 629–640. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612674](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612674).
        20. Ettinger et al. (2023). NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC. *Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. [PMID: 36928390](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36928390/) .
        21. Hendriks et al. (2021). ESMO consensus guidelines for advanced NSCLC. *Annals of Oncology, 32(7), 881–895. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.012).
        22. Skoulidis et al. (2021). Sotorasib for KRAS p.G12C-mutant NSCLC. *NEJM, 384(25), 2371–2381. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103695](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2103695).
        23. Li et al. (2022). Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-mutant NSCLC. *NEJM, 386(3), 241–251. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112431](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2112431)
        24. Leighl et al. (2019). Access to precision oncology: Challenges and opportunities. *JCO PrecisionOncology,3,1 10.[DOI:10.1200/PO.19.00078](https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00078) .
        25. Miller, R. M., & Thomas, P. A. (2018). "Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer." Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(1), 1-13.
        26. Jang, S. H., & Lee, Y. K. (2020). "Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer." Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy, 16(2), 263-268
        27. Glover, L. (2017). "Palliative care in lung cancer: A review of the evidence." American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 34(4), 333-340.
        28. Spruit, M. A., et al. (2013). "Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease." European Respiratory Journal, 41(6), 1244-1252.
        29. Gosselink, R., et al. (2014). "Nutritional support in lung cancer." European Respiratory Journal, 43(1), 7-10
        30. Faller, H., et al. (2013). "Psychosocial interventions for cancer patients: A review of the evidence." Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(3), 108-114.
        31. Lee, J. H., et al. (2017). "Acupuncture for pain and fatigue in lung cancer patients: A systematic review." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 53(4), 746-755.
        32. https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article-abstract/59/7/611/5157990
        33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369213603025.
        34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369213602998.
        35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369213603037.
        36. Sung, H., et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates. *CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71*(3), 209–249. 
        37. American Cancer Society (ACS) - www.cancer.org
        38. National Cancer Institute (NCI) - www.cancer.gov
        39. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society - www.lls.org
        40. Mayo Clinic - www.mayoclinic.org
        41. National Brain Tumor Society - www.braintumor.org
        42. World Health Organization (WHO) - www.who.int
        43. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). (2023). NCCN Guidelines for Non-    Small Cell Lung Cancer. [NCCN Guidelines] (https://www.nccn.org).
        44. Simone, C. B., & Vapiwala, N. (2019). Radiation therapy for lung cancer: Toxicity and recent advances. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 69(1), 64–79. [DOI: 10.3322/caac.21561](https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21561.
        45. Gralla, R. J., et al. (1999). Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(9), 2971–2994. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2971](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2971)  .
        46. Shaw, A. T., et al. (2014). Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. New EnglandJournalofMedicine,371(21),19631971.[DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1406766](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1406766)
        47. Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2018). Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(17), 1714–1768. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385
        48. New England Journal of Medicine*, 377(20), 1919–1929. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709937).
        49. Alberg, A. J., Brock, M. V., & Samet, J. M. (2013). Epidemiology of lung cancer: Looking to the future. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(8), 1004–1010. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2293](https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2293)
        50. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. (2018). Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Lung Cancer. [WCRF Report](https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/lung-cancer).

Photo
Upase Narsing
Corresponding author

Shivlingeshwar College Of Pharmacy (Pharm D), Almala, Latur.

Photo
Wadekar Vishal
Co-author

Shivlingeshwar College Of Pharmacy (Pharm D), Almala, Latur.

Photo
Yadav Anil
Co-author

Shivlingeshwar College Of Pharmacy (Pharm D), Almala, Latur.

Photo
Syed Afnaan
Co-author

Shivlingeshwar College Of Pharmacy (Pharm D), Almala, Latur.

Photo
Shinde Akanksha
Co-author

Shivlingeshwar College Of Pharmacy (Pharm D), Almala, Latur.

Photo
Dr. Giri Ashok
Co-author

Shivlingeshwar College Of Pharmacy (Pharm D), Almala, Latur.

Upase Narsing*, Wadekar Vishal, Yadav Anil, Syed Afnaan, Shinde Akanksha, Dr. Giri Ashok, Systematic Review on Lung Cancer Therapies: An Evidence Based Approach, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 3, 1148-1165. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15017477

More related articles
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Dru...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
Targeted Therapies in Blood Cancer...
Sanchit Armal, Radheshyam Azade, Om Avhale, Prashant Ingle, Dr. S...
Emerging Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of Various Diseases: Recent Advance...
Anita Rathod, Neha Khadse, Anjali Rathod, Ashok Chopane, Sapna Ghuge, Kavita Gaikwad, Manisha Khanda...
Related Articles
A Review Of Phytopharmacological Aspects Of Sphaeranthus Indicus Linn...
M. Anitha, G. Deepika , K. Sandhiya , G. Sneha , M. Soniya, ...
Phytochemical Screening Photoluminance Study and TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography)...
Vishakha Patial, Kanika, Dev Prakash Dahiya, Chinu Kumari, Rahul Sharma, Richa Kumari, Nikhil Rana, ...
Navigating The Landscape Of Liposome-Based Drug Delivery Systems : A Comprehensi...
Bansode Krushna, Wankhede Jayshri, Vyawhare Pankaj, Shewale Madhu, ...
Pharmacognostical And Phytochemical Studies of Aparajita (Clitoria Ternatea Linn...
Swati Zade, Dr. Parag Chaware, Dr. Pankaj Pimpalshende, Dr. Sanjay Toshniwal, ...
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Drug Testing: Bridging Biology an...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
More related articles
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Drug Testing: Bridging Biology an...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
Targeted Therapies in Blood Cancer...
Sanchit Armal, Radheshyam Azade, Om Avhale, Prashant Ingle, Dr. Shivshankar Mhaske, ...
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Drug Testing: Bridging Biology an...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
Targeted Therapies in Blood Cancer...
Sanchit Armal, Radheshyam Azade, Om Avhale, Prashant Ingle, Dr. Shivshankar Mhaske, ...