View Article

  • Revolutionizing Drug Delivery: Spanlastics as Adaptive Nanovesicular Platforms for Multimodal Therapeutics

  • Department of Pharmacy, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University Bareilly 243001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Abstract

In 2011, Spanlastics were first made available. An elastic system composed of the edge activator and non-ionic surfactant is the spanlastics, a novel elastic nanovesicle carrier. Drugs that are lipophilic or lipophobic can be delivered via SPs. This nanocarrier system are encapsulated in compartment composed of outer lipid and interior hydrophilic layers. These are vesicular carriers that are nontoxic, biodegradable, and nonimmunogenic. Multiple studies have shown that SPs can reduce side effects, increase therapeutic efficacy, improve medication absorption, and increase patient compliance. These vesicular vehicles also perform better in terms of chemical stability than liposomes due to their flexibility, and they have other benefits over the niosomal colloidal delivery systems. Additionally, by functioning as a disruptive agent and enhancing deformability against biological membranes, edge activator residency in the vesicle lipid membrane increases the permeability of nano-sized vesicles, both of which are acknowledged advantages of spanlastic vesicles elasticity.An aqueous solute solution is fully encapsulated inside them. They have been shown to be more chemically stable. In addition to providing targeted and regulated release of natural therapeutic components, they have corrected a number of shortcomings of the conventional dosage form. By delivering the active medicinal ingredients in a targeted manner and controlling their release rate, they address a number of problems related to the traditional dosage form. Emphasizing the value of SPs, their permeation mechanism, evaluation criteria, various preparation methodology, and applications is the aim of this review

Keywords

Nanotechnology, Spanlastics, Surfactant, Transdermal permeability, Vesicular drug delivery syetem

Introduction

Paul Ehrlich discovered a medication delivery method that would directly target sick cells in the 1990s, he started the research of targeted drug delivery system. Like transferosomes, these are extremely elastic and malleable carrier. Compared to the drug solution and these deformable vesicular carrier systems exhibit better penetration.1

A novel kind of elastic vesicular nanocarrier known as spanlastics traps the medication in the core cavity as a bilayer. Surfactant, which are made up of spans and edge activator are the basis for the word “Spanlastic” (Span+Elastic). Spanlastics, a novel drug delivery technology, were introduced in 2011.2 An elastic system composed of the edge- activator and non-ionic surfactant is the spanlastics, a novel elastic nanovesicle carrier. The drugs that are either lipophilic or hydrophilic can be administered via spanlastics. This nanocarrier system are enclosed in compartment composed of outer lipid and interior hydrophilic layers. These are vesicular carriers that are nontoxic, biodegradable, and nonimmunogenic. Several studies have shown that SPs can reduce side effects, increase therapeutic efficacy, improve medication absorption, and increase patient compliance. These vesicular vehicles also perform better in terms of chemical stability than liposomes due to their flexibility, and they have other benefits across niosomal colloidal delivery systems. Additionally, by functioning as a disruptive agent and enhancing deformability against biological membranes, edge activator residency in the vesicle lipid membrane increases the permeability of nano-sized vesicles, both of which are acknowledged advantages of spanlastic vesicles elasticity.3

This drug delivery innovation is part of a continuous evolution and has less side effects than earlier approaches. As a kind of elastic nanovesicle, spanlastics may transport a variety of drug molecules, including hydrophobic and hydrophilic ones, making them a promising option for use as a drug delivery vehicle. Spanlastics interest in a variety of administrative methods has been increasing over time. One innovative type of vesicular carrier that can serve as a site-specific medication delivery method is SPs. These devices have the ability to deliver drugs to a wide range of target locations, including the skin, nose, mouth, and eye respectively. Simply by prevents degradation it from a biological environment, spanlastics increase the bioavailability of drug, at the site. Spanlastics are stable, osmotically active, and capable of entrapping solutes. Because of its adaptable structural feature, they can be altered to meet the required standards.3

MAIN FEATURES OF SPANLASTICS4

1.    Osmotically active and stable solutes can be entrapped by the spanlastics.

2.    Spanlastic bilayer structure which supports the arrival of encased medication and allows them to in a controlled release drug delivery.

3.    Because of their structural characteristic’s flexibility, they can be modified to achieve required standards.

4.    By encapsulating the drug from biological environment, spanlastics improve the drug availability at the site.

ADVANTAGES4,5 

1.    Hydrophilic or lipophilic drug can be easily penetrating the biological membrane,such as cornea by the spanlastics.

2. Spanlastics are prepare to achieve the site-specific action.

3. These elastic vesicle features enable them to pass through the corneal membrane, vitreous cavity, and choroid in both the anterior and posterior portions of the eye, targeting the retinal pigment epithelium.

4. Spanlastics are naturally biodegradable and do not trigger the immunological response.

5. Spanlastics compared to traditional method, have more bioavailability because the drug features protective support, which allows it to reach the intended site without being degradation.

6. They continue to produce osmotic activity and the stability of API after it has been encapsulated.

7. These postpone the elimination of molecules of medicament from the systemic circulation during prolonged drug administration.

8. By encasing the drug in a lipid bilayer structure, they protect it from the harsh conditions of the biological environment.

9. They can be administered through oral, parenteral and even topical.

10. There are no any special requirements for handling or storing surfactant.

11. Compared to the liposomes, spanlastics are more chemically stable.

12. Method of preparation of spanlastics are economic and reliable.

DISADVANTAGES5,6

1. It has a poor water solubility.

2. it is easily degraded in an environment similar to that of the stomach, which is acidic. This makes it susceptible to first-pass metabolism in the liver.

3. Extrusion and sonication are the most common methods for preparing MLV, both take a significant amount of time and frequently necessitate the use of specialist machinery.

CLASSIFICATION OF SPANLASTICS

It is categorized according to the number of layers that it is composed of (Similarly to liposomes; SPs also can be categorized based on the numbers of layers it contain), which are discussed as below.7,8,9

1. Small Unilamellar Vesicles (SUVs): In general, the size of SUVs is between 10- 100nm. These are prepared through sonication method.

2. Multi-Lamellar Vesicles (MLVs): MLVs size approx. is 500- 1000nm in diameter. These are commonly used, easy to prepare a stable for a long duration.

3. Large Unilamellar Vesicles (LUVs): LUVs size range between 100- 3000nm. LUVs can entrap large amount of API.

 

 

Table 2. Classification of spanlastics

SR. NO.

TYPES OF SPs

SIZE

1.

SUVs

10 - 100nm

2.

MUVs

500 - 1000nm

3.

LUVs

100 - 3000nm

 

COMPOSITIONS OF SPANLASTICS

1. Nonionic Surfactant

Non-ionic surfactants are commonly used as wetting agents while creating vesicles because to their numerous benefits. Compared to anionic, amphoteric and cationic surfactants, they are more stable, compatible, and less harmful. Non-ionic surfactants exhibit strong interfacial activity due to their polar and non-polar components.14 The critical packing parameter (CPP), the chemical makeup of the ingredients, and the HLB of the wetting agent are some of the variables that may affect the formation of bilayer vesicles.Vesicles based on span 40 (HLB 6.7) and span 60 (HLB 4.7) are more stable and less likely to be disturbed, aggregated, and unstable compared to those based on span 80. Span 60's lipophilic qualities enable it to create lamellar matrix vesicles and entrap medicines more effectively than other non-ionic surfactants.10-12

2. Edge Activator

Edge activators are a unique type of hydrophilic or higher HLB value surfactant. These are single chain surfactants that reduce interfacial tension of the bilayer vesicles, destabilizing them and making them more deformable. Thus, they give these vesicles, lipid bilayer membranes flexibility. Edge activators typically form more spherical vesicles, which results in lower particle sizes.Combining an edge activator with SPs improves flexibility and reduces interfacial tension, allowing large particles to easily move through microscopic pore.13-15

3. Ethanol

The addition of ethanol improves the characteristics of these micro vesicular carrier. It is beneficial because it can condense membranes. It makes easier for the medication to divide and entrap inside the vesicles. By decreasing the thickness of vesicular membrane, the spanlastic system ability to entrap the drugs is increased.16-19

REMARKABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF SPANLASTICS

SPs are biodegradable, non-immunogenic, constantly release drugs, have flexible vesicles that enable them to pass across biological membranes with ease and without harm, and they also aid in increasing patient adherence. Because SPs contain non-ionic surfactants, they are non-irritating and can carry both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. Because SPs are versatile delivery vehicles, they can be used as specialized pharmaceutical delivery systems.20- 22

MECHANISM OF PANETRATION OF SPANLASTICS

Edge activators (EAs) work by disrupting the lipid bilayers in vesicles, making them more flexible and adaptable. The surfactants in these vesicles create small openings in lipid membranes, and at higher amounts, can even break down (lyse) these membranes. This flexibility allows the elastic vesicles to gently squeeze through the tiny spaces between cells, especially when a water gradient is present that helps drive this movement. The exact behavior depends on the properties of the membrane they are interacting with.23, 24 Figure.1

There are 2 mechanisms for drug penetration as seen in below figure.

I.     The elastic vesicles change the intercellular lipid lamellae by interacting with the epithelial cell membrane and functioning as penetration enhancers.

II.    The elastic vesicles can work as drug-carrier systems, allowing the vesicles interact with medication to travel beyond the biological membrane and through intercellular gaps. Two factors contribute towards successful passage of these carriers:

1. The vesicle bilayers extremely stress-dependent flexibility

2. An osmotic gradient is present.

 

 

 

FIG.1 MECHANISM OF SPANLASTICS PANETRATION INSIDE THE EPIDERMIS AND LIPID BILAYER

 

METHODS OF PREPARATION

1. Ethanol injection method: This process involves mixing an edge activator with a fixed amount of non-ionic surface active agent to create spanlastics. The medication is initially dissolved in ethanol mixed with span to get it ready for encapsulation. 5 mins. are spent sonicating the lipid solution. The edge activator (such Tween-80) in a heated aqueous phase is now continuously injected with this solution. For the last half hour, this phase has been agitated on a magnetic stirrer at temperatures between 70 and 80 degrees Celsius and speeds between 800 and 1600 rpm.25 FIG. 2

 

 

 

 

FIG.2 Ethanol injection method

 

 2. Hand shaking method: First of all dissolve surfactant in an organic solvent, then the solvent is vaporized in a vaccum evaporator fitted with a round-bottom flask, where pressure is gradually decreased, and the layer is re-hydrated using an aqueous solution containing the prescribed drugs, followed by constant agitation, which causes the surfactant layer to thicken. Amphiphilic molecules that have swelled will eventually fold, creating vesicles that act as encapsulating structures for the medication.26

3. Sonication: This process involves creating an aliquot of the drug in a buffer and adding it to the mixture of surfactants in a glass vial that holds 10 millilitres. The mixture is sonicated using the titanium probe.27

4. Ether injection: A 14-gauze needle is used to inject the surfactant into an aqueous phase that has been heated to 600 degrees Celsius at a rate of 25 milliliters per minute. The surfactant must be dissolved in 20 milliliters of ether in order to use this procedure. A rotary evaporator will be used to remove the ethanol from the ether solution. Vesicles with a single layer will occur as a result of the procedure once the organic solvent has been totally eliminated.28

5. Thin film hydration technique: Following a thorough weighing process, span 60 will be moved to a round-base flask and mixed in the chloroform. A thin coating will develop on the flask walls as the organic solvent is vacuum-evaporated at 55 degrees Celsius through a rotary evaporator spinning at ninety revolutions per minute. A specified amount of the medication can be dissolved in the aqueous phase by the chosen EA and co-solvent. After the thin film has been deposited, this aqueous phase will be added. To completely remove the lipid coating from the flask's walls, it will be rotated for 30 minutes at 60 degrees Celsius, normal pressure, and 90 revolutions per minute after being reattached to the evaporator. After standing for two more hours at room temperature to fully hydrate, the resulting distribution will be kept at 4 degrees Celsius overnight.29

6. Microfluidization method: In the interaction chamber, two fluidized streams, one holding the medication and other containing the surfactant, reach at high speeds via microchannels. The submerged jet technique assures that energy remains inside the spanlastic formulation zone. The formulation has increased homogeneity, reduced size, and improved reproducibility.30

EVALUATIONS OF SPANLASTICS

1. Entrapment Efficiency (EE):

Combining a precise amount of SPs dispersion with a suitable solvent volume allowed for quantification of drug content, including both unentrapped and entrapped levels. Next, the drug content is analyzed using spectrophotometry. Entrapment efficiency refers to the proportion of drug contained within the SP and can be calculated using the method indicated below (12).

                        

To assess entrapment efficiency, any substance not trapped by SPs is removed using centrifugation techniques. The residual solution is separated out, and the supernatant is obtained. The liquid is collected, diluted to a specific concentration, and tested using the technique specified in the drug monograph. The yield and efficiency of SP entrapment depend on the medication's physicochemical properties and production process.31, 32

2. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM):

TEM is used to assess the size, shape and lamellarity of SPs. To speed up the procedure, create a suspension and add 1% phosphotungstic acid. After draining excess liquid, the mixture is placed on a carbon-covered grid and allowed to dry entirely. The grid is shot at the appropriate magnification using a TEM.33, 34

3. Freeze Fractured Microscopy:

Drug entrapment, drug type, and surfactant all affect SP size and shape. Vesicles are freeze-thawed and inspected using a freeze-cracked electron microscope to measure their size. Vesicular suspensions are frequently frozen at low pressure (10_2 Pa) using liquid propane. Another application for glycol is as a cryoprotectant. At a particular angle, the cryofixed vesicles break. Then, at a 45-degree angle, platinum or carbon vapors cast a shadow on the surface. Carbon coating is used in this technology to strengthen the duplicate. TEM is used to clean and examine the replica.35, 36

4. Optical Microscopy Technique:

This approach is also used to assess size and shape. About 100 SPs are employed to determine particle size. This approach involves measuring the stage and eyepiece micrometers, then calculating the formulation size. Laser beam-based mastersizers are commonly used to find out the size, mean surface diameter, and mass distribution of spanlastics. DLS analysis using the Malvern zeta sizer is used to examine size distribution, mean diameter, and zeta potential. 37, 38

5. Elasticity Measurement:

The vesicles were expelled with a polycarbonate filter with 50 nm wide holes and continuous pressure. The procedure entailed using a 200 ml barrel and a stainless steel pressure holder with a 25mm filter. The intervals before and after the extrusion technique influenced the particle size of the extruded suspension. SPs flexibility allows it to slip past the mucus barrier, making it a unique vesicle type.39, 40

6. Stability Study:

This experiment assess pharmaceutical leakage from vesicles while in storage. The drug's preservation ability is tested by storing the chosen elastic vesicular suspension in glass vials at 480C for three months. Periodically, samples are extracted and analyzed for drug permeation, entrapment, and residual content.40

7. In-vitro Release Study:

This trial showed that the dialysis membrane technique was the most effective. SPs were added in a precise amount to the dialysis bag. To mix the dissolving liquid and dialysis bag, use a magnetic stirrer at 37°C. At regular intervals, fresh dissolving medium was introduced to the beaker while a sample solution was removed. The samples were examined spectrophotometrically to determine the maximal drug concentration.41, 42

8. In-vivo Study:

In vivo studies were performed using albino rats as experimental models. Bhaskaran and Lakshmi employed three groups of healthy rats, each weighing between 100–150 gm. and comprising three animals. The 1st group served as the control and was administered blank spanlastic vesicles without the drug. The 2nd group received the free drug, while the third group was treated with the drug-loaded formulation. Following treatment, the animals were sacrificed, and major organs such as the liver, lungs, spleen, kidneys, and heart were excised. These tissues were rinsed with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), homogenized, and subjected to centrifugation. The resulting supernatant was subsequently analyzed to determine the drug concentration using an appropriate analytical method. Similarly, Jadon et al. investigated tissue and plasma drug distribution in male albino rats. Three groups of five rats each were created from the animals. The pure drug was given to the second group, while phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was given to the first group, which was the control. The drug was administered orally to the third group using nanovesicular formulations. At predetermined time intervals, blood samples were collected, centrifuged, and immediately frozen. Drug levels in plasma were then quantified through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).43- 45 

ADVANCED CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SPANLASTICS IN TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY BEYOND CURRENT EXPERIMENTAL STAGES-

 

Surfactant

Edge Activator

Method of

Formulation

Entrapment Efficacy (%)

Route of

Administration

Drug Loaded

Application/

Indication

References

Span 60

Tween 60

Ethanol injection

Up to 85

Oral/Buccal/Sublingual

Famotidine

Ulcers, gastroprotection

?46

Span 60

SDC

Ethanol Injection+Sonication

80.4

Intranasal

Flibanserin

Female sexual disorder, CNS

?47

Span 60

Tween 80

Ethanol injection

66–77

Transdermal

Tacrolimus

Skin disorders, immunosuppression

?48

Span 60

Tween 80

Thin film hydration

72–90

Ocular

Methazolamide

Glaucoma

?49

Span 60

Tween 60/Tween 80

Thin film hydration

78–90

Transdermal

Glimepiride

Diabetes mellitus

?50

Span 60

Tween 80

Ethanol injection

60–82

Topical

Fenoprofen calcium

Arthritis—sustained anti-inflammatory effect

?51

Span 60

Tween 80

Modified spraying

70–85

Intranasal

Rasagiline mesylate

CNS, Parkinson’s disease

?52

Span 60

Tween 80

Ethanol injection

75–93

Transungual

Efinaconazole

Nail fungal infection

?53

Span 60

Tween 80

Ethanol injection

72–85

Oral/Buccal

Carvedilol

Cardiovascular disorders

?54

Span 60

SDC/Tween 60

Ethanol injection

80–88

Ocular

Fluconazole

Ocular mycoses

?55

Span 60

Tween 80

Ethanol injection

80–90

Topical

L-ascorbic acid

Antioxidant skin, UV protection

?56

Span 60

Tween 80

Thin film hydration

85–88

Topical

Thymoquinone

Anticancer (breast cancer)

?57

Span 60

Tween 80

Sonication

82–90

Topical/transdermal

Fluvastatin sodium

Rheumatoid arthritis

?58

Span 60

Tween 80/SDC/Tween 60

Ethanol injection

70–90

Ocular

Itraconazole

Fungal infections

?59

Span 60

SDC/Tween 80

Ethanol injection

73–88

Transdermal

Haloperidol

Psychosis, CNS

?60

 

SPANLASTICS IN HERBAL MEDICINE

Spanlastics offer a smart way to boost the effectiveness of herbal medicines by packaging plant-based compounds into flexible, tiny vesicles that improve absorption and stability.61,62

1. Why Use Them for Herbs?

Herbal actives like curcumin or silymarin often face issues such as poor solubility, quick breakdown, or low absorption, limiting their real-world benefits. Spanlastics protect these compounds, enhance skin or nasal penetration, and allow steady release, potentially cutting down doses while maximizing effects.63-64

2. Real World Examples

Researchers loaded curcumin from turmeric into spanlastics for a topical anti-aging gel, achieving better skin penetration and results than standard creams. Similarly, green tea's EGCG saw improved bioavailability in nanospanlastic form, showing promise for antioxidants.65,66

3. Pros and Challenges

They stand out for better stability, no immune reactions, and versatility across delivery routes like skin or nose. Still, scaling up production, ensuring long-term shelf life with herbs, and running more human trials remain hurdles before widespread use.67,69

TOXICOLOGICAL SAFETY OF SPANLASTICS

1. Concern About Surfactant

Non-ionic surfactants such as Span and Tween are generally regarded as safe (GRAS), yet their concentration and frequency of exposure can induce irritation, compromise barrier integrity, and exhibit cytotoxicity. Experimental spanlastic formulations frequently incorporate elevated surfactant levels to optimize vesicular elasticity, rendering them potentially unsuitable for chronic topical or mucosal applications absent comprehensive toxicological validation. While numerous ex vivo and in vivo investigations demonstrate negligible irritation or histopathological alterations at tested concentrations, these assessments are predominantly short-duration and rodent-based, underscoring uncertainties regarding cumulative toxicity, sensitization potential, and microbiome perturbations in human subjects.70-73

2. Long Term and Mucosal Contact

Spanlastics are designed to deform and penetrate deeply through the stratum corneum or mucosal epithelium, raising the possibility of higher local and even systemic exposure to both surfactants and entrapped drugs over time. For chronic indications (e.g., anti aging, psoriasis, nasal delivery for CNS drugs), long duration application could theoretically alter skin barrier integrity, mucociliary clearance, or local immune responses, yet systematic chronic toxicity and sensitization studies are largely lacking. These concerns become more relevant when spanlastics are combined with potent actives (NSAIDs, immunomodulators, CNS drugs), where enhanced penetration may amplify both therapeutic effect and adverse reactions.74-77

3. Gaps In Vivo and Clinical Evidence

Most spanlastic research stops at in vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation, and short term animal studies, with very few reports extending into formal pharmacokinetics, long term safety, or human clinical trials. Data on reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and chronic dermal or mucosal exposure are minimal, and almost no controlled clinical studies directly compare spanlastic products to established marketed nanocarriers such as liposomes or niosomes. This evidence gap makes it difficult for regulators to fully assess benefit–risk balance and hinders translation into registered, labeled products despite strong preclinical performance.78-81

4. Requirement of Market Translation

To move spanlastics from bench to market, developers will need systematic toxicology packages aligned with ICH and regional nanomedicine guidelines, including dose ranging repeat dose in vivo studies, local tolerance tests, and, for chronic use, long term dermal or mucosal safety evaluations. Well designed early phase clinical trials should document irritation, sensitization, systemic exposure, and comparative safety versus conventional formulations, while quality by design approaches must ensure consistent vesicle size, surfactant content, and impurity profiles across scale up.81-83

CURRENT DEVELOPMENT AND MARKET STATUS OF SPANLASTICS

Research has explored spanlastic gels, patches, and in situ gels for drugs like celecoxib, tacrolimus, levofloxacin, felodipine, and zaleplon, mainly as lab scale or preclinical formulations. However, literature and reviews indicate that clearly identified, widely marketed finished products based specifically on “spanlastics” are not yet established, so the system should be viewed as an innovative platform under active development rather than a fully commercialized technology.84-86

CONCLUSION

Spanlastics are emerging as an innovative vesicular drug delivery system that offers a non-invasive way to transport medications directly to the desired site in the body. They help overcome common pharmaceutical challenges such as poor solubility, instability, low bioavailability, and rapid degradation of drugs. Because of these properties, spanlastics are gaining attention as a potential breakthrough in nanovesicular delivery technology. They can carry both water-loving (hydrophilic) and fat-loving (lipophilic) drugs, ensuring more precise, site-specific therapeutic effects. Currently, this system is being explored for delivering treatments through various routes, including ocular, oral, topical, nasal, trans-ungual, and even to the middle ear.

REFERENCES

  1. Mengfei Li et al. ‘‘The Preparation and Evaluation of a Hydrochloride Hydrogel Patch with an Iontophoresis-Assisted Release of Terbinafine for Transdermal Delivery” MDPI journal of gels 2024; (10, 456).
  2. Isha Gupta et al. ‘‘Spanlastics as a Potential Approach for Enhancing the Nose-To-Brain Delivery of Piperine: In Vitro Prospect and In Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy for the Management of Epilepsy” MDPI journal of pharmaceutics 2023; (15, 641).
  3. A. Sharma et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: A MODERN APPROACH FOR NANOVESICULAR DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2020; (1057-1068).
  4. Vindhya V.S. et al., “SPANLASTICS; A MODERN FORMULATION APPROACH IN DRUG DELIVERY” European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2023;96-102.
  5. Afzal Khan et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: AN INNOVATIVE FORMULATION STRATEGY IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DELIVERY” World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2023; (219-229).
  6. Tenpattinam SS, Bukke SPN, Kusuma PK, Onohuean H, Mothilal M, Krishnamaraju U, et al. Self-assembled nanoparticles in ocular delivery: a comprehensive review. Discover Appl Sci. 2025. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s42452- 024- 06283-5.
  7. Tavakoli S, Peynshaert K, Lajunen T, Devoldere J, Del Amo EM, Ruponen M, et al. Ocular barriers to retinal delivery of intravitreal liposomes: impact of vitreoretinal interface. J Controlled Release. 2020;328:952–61.
  8. Lajunen T, Nurmi R, Kontturi L, Viitala L, Yliperttula M, Murtomäki L, et al. Light activated liposomes: Functionality and prospects in ocular drug delivery. J Controlled Release. 2016;244:157–66.
  9. Su Y, Fan X, Pang Y. Nano-based ocular drug delivery systems: an insight into the preclinical/clinical studies and their potential in the treatment of posterior ocular diseases. Biomaterials science. 2023;11:4490–507.
  10. Rudokas M, Najlah M, Alhnan MA, Elhissi A. Liposome delivery systems for inhalation: a critical review highlighting formulation issues and anticancer applications. Med Princ Pract: Int J Kuwait Univ, Health Sci Centre. 2016;25(Suppl 2):60–72.
  11. A. Sharma et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: A MODERN APPROACH FOR NANOVESICULAR DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2020; (1057-1068).
  12. Badria F, Mazyed E. Formulation of nanospanlastics as a promising approach for improving the topical delivery of a natural leukotriene inhibitor (3-acetyl-11-keto-b-boswellic acid): Statistical optimization, in vitro characterization, and ex vivo permeation study. Drug Des Dev Ther 2020;14: 3697e721. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S265167.
  13. Chauhan MK, Khanna G.Recent advance of nanotechnology for the treatment of ocular disease. Khanna al. World J Pharm Res. 2018;7(15):239e57. https://doi.org/10.20959/wjpr201815-12968.
  14. Gaafar PME, Abdallah OY, Farid RM, Abdelkader H. Prep aration, characterization and evaluation of novel elastic nanosized niosomes (ethoniosomes) for ocular delivery of prednisolone. J Liposome Res 2014;24(3):204e15. https://doi.org/10.3109/08982104.2014.881850.
  15. El Meshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv 2016; 23(7):2115e23. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.942811.
  16. Afzal Khan et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: AN INNOVATIVE FORMULATION STRATEGY IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DELIVERY” World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2023; (219-229).
  17. Alhammid, Shaimaa N. Abd; Kassab, Hanan J.; Hussein, Lina S.; Haiss, Mahmood A.; and Alkufi, Hussein k. (2023) "Spanlastics Nanovesicles: An Emerging and Innovative Approach for Drug Delivery," Maaen Journal for Medical Sciences: Vol. 2 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. https://doi.org/10.55810/27899136.1027
  18. Maiti B, Kakkar S, Kaur IP, Basha M, Abd El-Alim SH, et al. Preparation of an anti-inflammatory agent in different dosage forms for topical application a thesis presented By Int J Pharm 2019;18(1):70e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm. 2015.02.012.
  19. Vindhya V.S. et al., “SPANLASTICS; A MODERN FORMULATION APPROACH IN DRUG DELIVERY” European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2023;96-102.
  20. Abdelrahman FE, Elsayed I, Gad MK, Elshafeey AH, MohamedMI. Response surface optimization, ex vivo and in vivo investigation of nasal spanlastics for bioavailability enhancement andbraintargeting of risperidone. Int J Pharm. Elsevier B.V. 2017;530(12):1e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.050.
  21. Sallam NM, Sanad RAB, Ahmed MM, Khafagy ES, Ghorab M, Gad S. Impact of the mucoadhesive lyophilized wafer loaded with novel carvedilol nano-spanlastics on biochemical markers in the heart of spontaneously hyper tensive rat models. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. Drug Delivery and Transl Res. 2020;11:1009e36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00814-4.
  22. Ramadon D, McCrudden MTC, Courtenay AJ, Donnelly RF. Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery sys tems: current trends and applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2021;12:758e91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021- 00909-6.
  23. Kaur IP, Rana C, Singh M, et al. Development and evaluation of novel surfactant-based elastic vesicular system for ocular delivery of fluconazole. J Ocul Pharmacol Therapeut 2012;28: 484e96. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2011.0176.
  24. Sharma A, Pahwa S, Bhati S, Kudeshia P. Spanlastics: A modern approach for nanovesicular drug delivery system. Int J Pharma Sci Res 2020;11:1057e65. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1057-65.
  25. Ahlam Zaid Alkilani et al. “Fabrication of Thymoquinone and Ascorbic Acid-Loaded Spanlastics Gel for Hyperpigmentation: In Vitro Release, Cytotoxicity, and Skin Permeation Studies’’ MDPI journal of Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 48.
  26. Lee VH, Robinson JR. Enzymatic Barriers to Peptide and Protein Absorption. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 1998; 5(2):69e97. PMID: 3052875.
  27. Alisagar S, Tushar KV, Mansoor MA. Nanocarriers for sys temic and mucosal vaccine delivery. Recent Pat Drug De livery Formulation 2007;1(1):1e91. https://doi.org/10.2174/187221107779814140.
  28. Vindhya V.S. et al., “SPANLASTICS; A MODERN FORMULATION APPROACH IN DRUG DELIVERY” European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2023;96-102.
  29. Alisagar S, Tushar KV, Mansoor MA. Nanocarriers for sys temic and mucosal vaccine delivery. Recent Pat Drug De livery Formulation 2007;1(1):1e91. https://doi.org/10.2174/187221107779814140.
  30. Elhabak M, Ibrahim S, Abouelatta SM. Topical delivery of l ascorbic acid spanlastics for stability enhancement and treatment of UVB induced damaged skin. Drug Deliv 2021; 28(1):445e53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1886377.
  31. Sharma A, Pahwa S, Bhati S, Kudeshia P. Spanlastics: A modern approach for nanovesicular drug delivery system. Int J Pharma Sci Res 2020;11:1057e65. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1057-65.
  32. Fahmy AM, El-Setouhy DA, Ibrahim AB, Habib BA, Tayel SA, Bayoumi NA. Penetration enhancer-containing spanlastics (PECSs) for transdermal delivery of haloperidol: in vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo biodistribution studies. Drug Delivery 2018;25(1):12e22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2017.1410262.
  33. Suma US, Parthiban S, Kumar GPS. Formulation and evaluation of niosomal gel for transdermal delivery of lamivudine. World J Pharmaceut Res 2016;5:1332e42.
  34. Balakrishnan P, Shanmugam S, Lee WS, Lee WM, Kim JO, Oh DH, Kim DD, Kim JS, Yoo BK, Choi HG, Woo JS, Yong CS. Formulation and in-vitro assessment of minoxidil niosomes for enhanced skin delivery. Int J Pharm 2009;377: 1e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.020.
  35. Al-mahallawi AM, Khowessah OM, Shoukri RA. Enhanced non invasive trans-tympanic delivery of ciprofloxacin through encapsulation into nano-spanlastic vesicles: fabri cation, in-vitro characterization, and comparative ex-vivo permeation studies. Int J Pharm 2017;522(1e2):157e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.005.
  36. Cevc G and Blume G: Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. BBA - Biomembranes 1992; 1104: 226 32.
  37. El Meshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv 2016; 23(7):2115e23. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.942811.
  38. Spangler RS: Insulin administration via liposomes. Diabetes Care 1990; 13: 911-22.
  39. Sallam NM, Abdel R, Sanad B, Ahmed MM, Khafagy EL, Ghorab M, Gad S. Impact of The Mucoadhesive Lyophilized Wafer Loaded with Novel Carvedilol NanoSpanlastics On Biochemical Markers in The Heart of Spontaneously Hy pertensive Rat Models. Drug Deliv. And Transl. Res 2020: 1e30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00814-4.
  40. El Menshawe Shahira F, Nafady Mohamed M, Aboud Heba M, Kharshoum Rasha M, Hussein Elkelawy Asmaa Mohammed M, Doaa S. Hamad Transdermal Delivery of Fluvastatin Sodium Via Tailored Spanlastic Nanovesicles: Mitigated Freund's Adjuvant Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis in Rats Through Suppressing P38 MAPK Signaling Pathway. Drug Deliv 2019;26(1):1140e54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2019.1686087.
  41. Ge Yassin, Amer RehamI, AhmedM,Fayez.Carbamazepine Loaded Vesicular Structures for Enhanced Brain Targeting Via Intranasal Route: Optimization, In Vitro Evaluation, And In Vivo Study. Int J Appl Pharm 2019;11(4):264e74. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019v11i4.33474.
  42. SipaiAltafBhai M, Vandana D, Mamatha Y and Prasanth V: Liposomes: An overview. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Innovations 2012; 1: 13-21.
  43. Bangham AD: Properties and uses of lipid vesicles: an overview. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1978; 308: 2-7.
  44. SzokaJr F and Papahadjopoulos D: Procedure for preparation of liposomes with large internal aqueous space and high capture by reverse-phase evaporation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1978;4194-8.
  45. Deamer DW: Preparation and properties of ether-injection liposomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1978; 308: 250-8.
  46. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  47. Alharbi WS, Hareeri RH, Bazuhair M, Alfaleh MA, Alhakamy NA, Fahmy UA, Alamoudi AA, Badr-Eldin SM, Ahmed OA, AlGhamdi SA, Naguib MJ. Spanlastics as a Potential Platform for Enhancing the Brain Delivery of Flibanserin: In Vitro Response-Surface Optimization and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics Assessment. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 28;14(12):2627. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122627. PMID: 36559120; PMCID: PMC9786754.
  48. Zaki, R.M.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Alshora, D.H.; El Ela, A.E.S.A. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Gel Containing Tacrolimus-Loaded Spanlastics: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo Studies. Polymers 2022, 14, 1528. https:// doi.org/10.3390/polym14081528.
  49. Kakkar S, Kaur IP. Spanlastics—a novel nanovesicular carrier system for ocular delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2011;413(1-2):202-210.
  50. Elsaied EH, Dawaba HM, Ibrahim ESA, Afouna MI. Spanlastics gel-A novel drug carrier for transdermal delivery of glimepiride. J Liposome Res. 2023 Mar;33(1):102-114. doi: 10.1080/08982104.2022.2100902. Epub 2022 Jul 21. Erratum in: J Liposome Res. 2023 Mar;33(1):115. doi: 10.1080/08982104.2022.2122146. PMID: 35862551.
  51. Farghaly DA, Aboelwafa AA, Hamza MY, Mohamed MI. Topical Delivery of Fenoprofen Calcium via Elastic Nano-vesicular Spanlastics: Optimization Using Experimental Design and In Vivo Evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 Nov;18(8):2898-2909. doi: 10.1208/s12249-017-0771-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20. PMID: 28429293.
  52. Ali MM, Shoukri RA, Yousry C. Thin film hydration versus modified spraying technique to fabricate intranasal spanlastic nanovesicles for rasagiline mesylate brain delivery: Characterization, statistical optimization, and in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023 Apr;13(4):1153-1168. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01285-5. Epub 2022 Dec 30. PMID: 36585559; PMCID: PMC9981512.
  53. Almuqbil RM, Sreeharsha N, Nair AB. Formulation-by-Design of Efinaconazole Spanlastic Nanovesicles for Transungual Delivery Using Statistical Risk Management and Multivariate Analytical Techniques. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 6;14(7):1419. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071419. PMID: 35890316; PMCID: PMC9324635.
  54. Sallam NM, Sanad RAB, Ahmed MM, Khafagy ELS, Ghorab M, Gad S. Impact of the mucoadhesive lyophilized wafer loaded with novel carvedilol nano-spanlastics on biochemical markers in the heart of spontaneously hypertensive rat models. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021 Jun;11(3):1009-1036. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00814-4. PMID: 32607938.
  55. Kaur IP, Rana C, Singh M, Bhushan S, Singh H, Kakkar S. Development and evaluation of novel surfactant-based elastic vesicular system for ocular delivery of fluconazole. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;28(5):484-96. doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0176. Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22694593.
  56. Elhabak M, Ibrahim S, Abouelatta SM. Topical delivery of l-ascorbic acid spanlastics for stability enhancement and treatment of UVB induced damaged skin. Drug Deliv. 2021 Dec;28(1):445-453. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1886377. PMID: 33620008; PMCID: PMC7909477.
  57. Alaaeldin, E., Mostafa, M., Mansour, H. F., & Soliman, G. M. (2021). Spanlastics as an efficient delivery system for the enhancement of thymoquinone anticancer efficacy: Fabrication and cytotoxic studies against breast cancer cell lines. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 65, 102725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102725.
  58. El Menshawe SF, Nafady MM, Aboud HM, Kharshoum RM, Elkelawy AMMH, Hamad DS. Transdermal delivery of fluvastatin sodium via tailored spanlastic nanovesicles: mitigated Freund's adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis in rats through suppressing p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Drug Deliv. 2019 Dec;26(1):1140-1154. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1686087. PMID: 31736366; PMCID: PMC6882467.
  59. ElMeshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv. 2016 Sep;23(7):2115-2123. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.942811. Epub 2014 Jul 31. PMID: 25080226.
  60. Fahmy AM, El-Setouhy DA, Ibrahim AB, Habib BA, Tayel SA, Bayoumi NA. Penetration enhancer-containing spanlastics (PECSs) for transdermal delivery of haloperidol: in vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo biodistribution studies. Drug Deliv. 2018 Nov;25(1):12-22. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1410262. PMID: 29219628; PMCID: PMC6058714.
  61. Kumar L., Rana R., Kukreti G., Aggarwal V., Chaurasia H., Sharma P., Jyothiraditya V. Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes // Current Pharmaceutical Design. - 2024. - Vol. 30. - N. 28. - P. 2206-2221. doi: 10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  62. Rajab, N. A., Adulhussein, Y. M., Kadhim, E. J., … Abdulhamid, S. N. (2025). Spanelastic as a vesicular nanocarrier for transdermal drug delivery system: Preparation, characterization and bioactive loading. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 29(2), 833-840. https://doi.org/10.12991/jrespharm.1666368.
  63. El Hosary R, Teaima MH, El-Nabarawi M, Yousry Y, Eltahan M, Bakr A, Aboelela H, Abdelmonem R, Nassif RM. Topical delivery of extracted curcumin as curcumin loaded spanlastics anti-aging gel: Optimization using experimental design and ex-vivo evaluation. Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Jan;32(1):101912. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101912. Epub 2023 Dec 9. PMID: 38178851; PMCID: PMC10765109.
  64. Sayyad M, Sutar AD, Shivhare K, Shukla R, Flora SJS. Silymarin as a phytopharmaceutical agent: advances in mechanistic insights, formulation strategies, and pre-clinical applications. Front Pharmacol. 2025 Nov 27;16:1711653. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1711653. PMID: 41394134; PMCID: PMC12695834.
  65. Kumar L., Rana R., Kukreti G., Aggarwal V., Chaurasia H., Sharma P., Jyothiraditya V. Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes // Current Pharmaceutical Design. - 2024. - Vol. 30. - N. 28. - P. 2206-2221. doi: 10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  66. Annisa, R. (2025a). Spanlastic as a Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Systematic review. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, 18(1), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3099
  67. Kumar L., Rana R., Kukreti G., Aggarwal V., Chaurasia H., Sharma P., Jyothiraditya V. Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes // Current Pharmaceutical Design. - 2024. - Vol. 30. - N. 28. - P. 2206-2221. doi: 10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  68. El Hosary R, Teaima MH, El-Nabarawi M, Yousry Y, Eltahan M, Bakr A, Aboelela H, Abdelmonem R, Nassif RM. Topical delivery of extracted curcumin as curcumin loaded spanlastics anti-aging gel: Optimization using experimental design and ex-vivo evaluation. Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Jan;32(1):101912. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101912. Epub 2023 Dec 9. PMID: 38178851; PMCID: PMC10765109.
  69. Rajab, N. A., Adulhussein, Y. M., Kadhim, E. J., … Abdulhamid, S. N. (2025). Spanelastic as a vesicular nanocarrier for transdermal drug delivery system: Preparation, characterization and bioactive loading. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 29(2), 833-840. https://doi.org/10.12991/jrespharm.1666368.
  70. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.
  71. Elhabak M, Ibrahim S, Abouelatta SM. Topical delivery of l-ascorbic acid spanlastics for stability enhancement and treatment of UVB induced damaged skin. Drug Deliv. 2021 Dec;28(1):445-453. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1886377. PMID: 33620008; PMCID: PMC7909477.
  72. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  73. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  74. Annisa, R. (2025c). Spanlastic as a Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Systematic review. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, 18(1), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3099.
  75. Mohamed, N. W., Sabry, S. A., Mahdy, M. A., & Faisal, M. M. (2024). Tailoring of spanlastics for promoting transdermal delivery of irbesartan: In vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo assessment. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 100, 106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106088.
  76. Alaaeldin E, Abou-Taleb HA, Mohamad SA, Elrehany M, Gaber SS, Mansour HF. Topical Nano-Vesicular Spanlastics of Celecoxib: Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effect and Down-Regulation of TNF-α, NF-?B and COX-2 in Complete Freund’s Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model in Rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:133-145

https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S289828.

  1. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  2. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.
  3. Badria F, Mazyed E. Formulation of Nanospanlastics as a Promising Approach for ‎Improving the Topical Delivery of a Natural Leukotriene Inhibitor (3-‎Acetyl-11-Keto-β-Boswellic Acid): Statistical Optimization, in vitro ‎Characterization, and ex vivo Permeation Study. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Sep 15;14:3697-3721. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S265167. PMID: 32982176; PMCID: PMC7501970.
  4. Kumar, L., Rana, R., Kukreti, G., Aggarwal, V., Chaurasia, H., Sharma, P., & Jyothiraditya, V. (2024). Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 30(28), 2206–2221.   https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  5. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  6. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.
  7. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  8. El-Shenawy AA, Abd Elkarim RA, Mahmoud RA, Ramadan AEH, Alamri AH, Abdelkader H, Elafify MS, Mahmoud EA, Saddik MS, Mohamed MS. Zaleplon nanospanlastics loaded transdermal patches: formulation, optimization, ex-vivo permeation, and in-vivo studies. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2025 Nov 5;28:15406. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2025.15406. PMID: 41268063; PMCID: PMC12626903.
  9. Alaaeldin E, Abou-Taleb HA, Mohamad SA, Elrehany M, Gaber SS, Mansour HF. Topical Nano-Vesicular Spanlastics of Celecoxib: Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effect and Down-Regulation of TNF-α, NF-?B and COX-2 in Complete Freund’s Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model in Rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:133-145
  1. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S289828
  1. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.

Reference

  1. Mengfei Li et al. ‘‘The Preparation and Evaluation of a Hydrochloride Hydrogel Patch with an Iontophoresis-Assisted Release of Terbinafine for Transdermal Delivery” MDPI journal of gels 2024; (10, 456).
  2. Isha Gupta et al. ‘‘Spanlastics as a Potential Approach for Enhancing the Nose-To-Brain Delivery of Piperine: In Vitro Prospect and In Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy for the Management of Epilepsy” MDPI journal of pharmaceutics 2023; (15, 641).
  3. A. Sharma et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: A MODERN APPROACH FOR NANOVESICULAR DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2020; (1057-1068).
  4. Vindhya V.S. et al., “SPANLASTICS; A MODERN FORMULATION APPROACH IN DRUG DELIVERY” European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2023;96-102.
  5. Afzal Khan et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: AN INNOVATIVE FORMULATION STRATEGY IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DELIVERY” World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2023; (219-229).
  6. Tenpattinam SS, Bukke SPN, Kusuma PK, Onohuean H, Mothilal M, Krishnamaraju U, et al. Self-assembled nanoparticles in ocular delivery: a comprehensive review. Discover Appl Sci. 2025. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s42452- 024- 06283-5.
  7. Tavakoli S, Peynshaert K, Lajunen T, Devoldere J, Del Amo EM, Ruponen M, et al. Ocular barriers to retinal delivery of intravitreal liposomes: impact of vitreoretinal interface. J Controlled Release. 2020;328:952–61.
  8. Lajunen T, Nurmi R, Kontturi L, Viitala L, Yliperttula M, Murtomäki L, et al. Light activated liposomes: Functionality and prospects in ocular drug delivery. J Controlled Release. 2016;244:157–66.
  9. Su Y, Fan X, Pang Y. Nano-based ocular drug delivery systems: an insight into the preclinical/clinical studies and their potential in the treatment of posterior ocular diseases. Biomaterials science. 2023;11:4490–507.
  10. Rudokas M, Najlah M, Alhnan MA, Elhissi A. Liposome delivery systems for inhalation: a critical review highlighting formulation issues and anticancer applications. Med Princ Pract: Int J Kuwait Univ, Health Sci Centre. 2016;25(Suppl 2):60–72.
  11. A. Sharma et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: A MODERN APPROACH FOR NANOVESICULAR DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2020; (1057-1068).
  12. Badria F, Mazyed E. Formulation of nanospanlastics as a promising approach for improving the topical delivery of a natural leukotriene inhibitor (3-acetyl-11-keto-b-boswellic acid): Statistical optimization, in vitro characterization, and ex vivo permeation study. Drug Des Dev Ther 2020;14: 3697e721. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S265167.
  13. Chauhan MK, Khanna G.Recent advance of nanotechnology for the treatment of ocular disease. Khanna al. World J Pharm Res. 2018;7(15):239e57. https://doi.org/10.20959/wjpr201815-12968.
  14. Gaafar PME, Abdallah OY, Farid RM, Abdelkader H. Prep aration, characterization and evaluation of novel elastic nanosized niosomes (ethoniosomes) for ocular delivery of prednisolone. J Liposome Res 2014;24(3):204e15. https://doi.org/10.3109/08982104.2014.881850.
  15. El Meshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv 2016; 23(7):2115e23. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.942811.
  16. Afzal Khan et al. ‘‘SPANLASTICS: AN INNOVATIVE FORMULATION STRATEGY IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DELIVERY” World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2023; (219-229).
  17. Alhammid, Shaimaa N. Abd; Kassab, Hanan J.; Hussein, Lina S.; Haiss, Mahmood A.; and Alkufi, Hussein k. (2023) "Spanlastics Nanovesicles: An Emerging and Innovative Approach for Drug Delivery," Maaen Journal for Medical Sciences: Vol. 2 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. https://doi.org/10.55810/27899136.1027
  18. Maiti B, Kakkar S, Kaur IP, Basha M, Abd El-Alim SH, et al. Preparation of an anti-inflammatory agent in different dosage forms for topical application a thesis presented By Int J Pharm 2019;18(1):70e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm. 2015.02.012.
  19. Vindhya V.S. et al., “SPANLASTICS; A MODERN FORMULATION APPROACH IN DRUG DELIVERY” European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2023;96-102.
  20. Abdelrahman FE, Elsayed I, Gad MK, Elshafeey AH, MohamedMI. Response surface optimization, ex vivo and in vivo investigation of nasal spanlastics for bioavailability enhancement andbraintargeting of risperidone. Int J Pharm. Elsevier B.V. 2017;530(12):1e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.050.
  21. Sallam NM, Sanad RAB, Ahmed MM, Khafagy ES, Ghorab M, Gad S. Impact of the mucoadhesive lyophilized wafer loaded with novel carvedilol nano-spanlastics on biochemical markers in the heart of spontaneously hyper tensive rat models. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. Drug Delivery and Transl Res. 2020;11:1009e36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00814-4.
  22. Ramadon D, McCrudden MTC, Courtenay AJ, Donnelly RF. Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery sys tems: current trends and applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2021;12:758e91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021- 00909-6.
  23. Kaur IP, Rana C, Singh M, et al. Development and evaluation of novel surfactant-based elastic vesicular system for ocular delivery of fluconazole. J Ocul Pharmacol Therapeut 2012;28: 484e96. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2011.0176.
  24. Sharma A, Pahwa S, Bhati S, Kudeshia P. Spanlastics: A modern approach for nanovesicular drug delivery system. Int J Pharma Sci Res 2020;11:1057e65. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1057-65.
  25. Ahlam Zaid Alkilani et al. “Fabrication of Thymoquinone and Ascorbic Acid-Loaded Spanlastics Gel for Hyperpigmentation: In Vitro Release, Cytotoxicity, and Skin Permeation Studies’’ MDPI journal of Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 48.
  26. Lee VH, Robinson JR. Enzymatic Barriers to Peptide and Protein Absorption. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 1998; 5(2):69e97. PMID: 3052875.
  27. Alisagar S, Tushar KV, Mansoor MA. Nanocarriers for sys temic and mucosal vaccine delivery. Recent Pat Drug De livery Formulation 2007;1(1):1e91. https://doi.org/10.2174/187221107779814140.
  28. Vindhya V.S. et al., “SPANLASTICS; A MODERN FORMULATION APPROACH IN DRUG DELIVERY” European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2023;96-102.
  29. Alisagar S, Tushar KV, Mansoor MA. Nanocarriers for sys temic and mucosal vaccine delivery. Recent Pat Drug De livery Formulation 2007;1(1):1e91. https://doi.org/10.2174/187221107779814140.
  30. Elhabak M, Ibrahim S, Abouelatta SM. Topical delivery of l ascorbic acid spanlastics for stability enhancement and treatment of UVB induced damaged skin. Drug Deliv 2021; 28(1):445e53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1886377.
  31. Sharma A, Pahwa S, Bhati S, Kudeshia P. Spanlastics: A modern approach for nanovesicular drug delivery system. Int J Pharma Sci Res 2020;11:1057e65. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1057-65.
  32. Fahmy AM, El-Setouhy DA, Ibrahim AB, Habib BA, Tayel SA, Bayoumi NA. Penetration enhancer-containing spanlastics (PECSs) for transdermal delivery of haloperidol: in vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo biodistribution studies. Drug Delivery 2018;25(1):12e22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2017.1410262.
  33. Suma US, Parthiban S, Kumar GPS. Formulation and evaluation of niosomal gel for transdermal delivery of lamivudine. World J Pharmaceut Res 2016;5:1332e42.
  34. Balakrishnan P, Shanmugam S, Lee WS, Lee WM, Kim JO, Oh DH, Kim DD, Kim JS, Yoo BK, Choi HG, Woo JS, Yong CS. Formulation and in-vitro assessment of minoxidil niosomes for enhanced skin delivery. Int J Pharm 2009;377: 1e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.020.
  35. Al-mahallawi AM, Khowessah OM, Shoukri RA. Enhanced non invasive trans-tympanic delivery of ciprofloxacin through encapsulation into nano-spanlastic vesicles: fabri cation, in-vitro characterization, and comparative ex-vivo permeation studies. Int J Pharm 2017;522(1e2):157e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.005.
  36. Cevc G and Blume G: Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. BBA - Biomembranes 1992; 1104: 226 32.
  37. El Meshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv 2016; 23(7):2115e23. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.942811.
  38. Spangler RS: Insulin administration via liposomes. Diabetes Care 1990; 13: 911-22.
  39. Sallam NM, Abdel R, Sanad B, Ahmed MM, Khafagy EL, Ghorab M, Gad S. Impact of The Mucoadhesive Lyophilized Wafer Loaded with Novel Carvedilol NanoSpanlastics On Biochemical Markers in The Heart of Spontaneously Hy pertensive Rat Models. Drug Deliv. And Transl. Res 2020: 1e30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00814-4.
  40. El Menshawe Shahira F, Nafady Mohamed M, Aboud Heba M, Kharshoum Rasha M, Hussein Elkelawy Asmaa Mohammed M, Doaa S. Hamad Transdermal Delivery of Fluvastatin Sodium Via Tailored Spanlastic Nanovesicles: Mitigated Freund's Adjuvant Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis in Rats Through Suppressing P38 MAPK Signaling Pathway. Drug Deliv 2019;26(1):1140e54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2019.1686087.
  41. Ge Yassin, Amer RehamI, AhmedM,Fayez.Carbamazepine Loaded Vesicular Structures for Enhanced Brain Targeting Via Intranasal Route: Optimization, In Vitro Evaluation, And In Vivo Study. Int J Appl Pharm 2019;11(4):264e74. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019v11i4.33474.
  42. SipaiAltafBhai M, Vandana D, Mamatha Y and Prasanth V: Liposomes: An overview. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Innovations 2012; 1: 13-21.
  43. Bangham AD: Properties and uses of lipid vesicles: an overview. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1978; 308: 2-7.
  44. SzokaJr F and Papahadjopoulos D: Procedure for preparation of liposomes with large internal aqueous space and high capture by reverse-phase evaporation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1978;4194-8.
  45. Deamer DW: Preparation and properties of ether-injection liposomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1978; 308: 250-8.
  46. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  47. Alharbi WS, Hareeri RH, Bazuhair M, Alfaleh MA, Alhakamy NA, Fahmy UA, Alamoudi AA, Badr-Eldin SM, Ahmed OA, AlGhamdi SA, Naguib MJ. Spanlastics as a Potential Platform for Enhancing the Brain Delivery of Flibanserin: In Vitro Response-Surface Optimization and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics Assessment. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 28;14(12):2627. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122627. PMID: 36559120; PMCID: PMC9786754.
  48. Zaki, R.M.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Alshora, D.H.; El Ela, A.E.S.A. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Gel Containing Tacrolimus-Loaded Spanlastics: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo Studies. Polymers 2022, 14, 1528. https:// doi.org/10.3390/polym14081528.
  49. Kakkar S, Kaur IP. Spanlastics—a novel nanovesicular carrier system for ocular delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2011;413(1-2):202-210.
  50. Elsaied EH, Dawaba HM, Ibrahim ESA, Afouna MI. Spanlastics gel-A novel drug carrier for transdermal delivery of glimepiride. J Liposome Res. 2023 Mar;33(1):102-114. doi: 10.1080/08982104.2022.2100902. Epub 2022 Jul 21. Erratum in: J Liposome Res. 2023 Mar;33(1):115. doi: 10.1080/08982104.2022.2122146. PMID: 35862551.
  51. Farghaly DA, Aboelwafa AA, Hamza MY, Mohamed MI. Topical Delivery of Fenoprofen Calcium via Elastic Nano-vesicular Spanlastics: Optimization Using Experimental Design and In Vivo Evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 Nov;18(8):2898-2909. doi: 10.1208/s12249-017-0771-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20. PMID: 28429293.
  52. Ali MM, Shoukri RA, Yousry C. Thin film hydration versus modified spraying technique to fabricate intranasal spanlastic nanovesicles for rasagiline mesylate brain delivery: Characterization, statistical optimization, and in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023 Apr;13(4):1153-1168. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01285-5. Epub 2022 Dec 30. PMID: 36585559; PMCID: PMC9981512.
  53. Almuqbil RM, Sreeharsha N, Nair AB. Formulation-by-Design of Efinaconazole Spanlastic Nanovesicles for Transungual Delivery Using Statistical Risk Management and Multivariate Analytical Techniques. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 6;14(7):1419. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071419. PMID: 35890316; PMCID: PMC9324635.
  54. Sallam NM, Sanad RAB, Ahmed MM, Khafagy ELS, Ghorab M, Gad S. Impact of the mucoadhesive lyophilized wafer loaded with novel carvedilol nano-spanlastics on biochemical markers in the heart of spontaneously hypertensive rat models. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021 Jun;11(3):1009-1036. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00814-4. PMID: 32607938.
  55. Kaur IP, Rana C, Singh M, Bhushan S, Singh H, Kakkar S. Development and evaluation of novel surfactant-based elastic vesicular system for ocular delivery of fluconazole. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;28(5):484-96. doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0176. Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22694593.
  56. Elhabak M, Ibrahim S, Abouelatta SM. Topical delivery of l-ascorbic acid spanlastics for stability enhancement and treatment of UVB induced damaged skin. Drug Deliv. 2021 Dec;28(1):445-453. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1886377. PMID: 33620008; PMCID: PMC7909477.
  57. Alaaeldin, E., Mostafa, M., Mansour, H. F., & Soliman, G. M. (2021). Spanlastics as an efficient delivery system for the enhancement of thymoquinone anticancer efficacy: Fabrication and cytotoxic studies against breast cancer cell lines. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 65, 102725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102725.
  58. El Menshawe SF, Nafady MM, Aboud HM, Kharshoum RM, Elkelawy AMMH, Hamad DS. Transdermal delivery of fluvastatin sodium via tailored spanlastic nanovesicles: mitigated Freund's adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis in rats through suppressing p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Drug Deliv. 2019 Dec;26(1):1140-1154. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1686087. PMID: 31736366; PMCID: PMC6882467.
  59. ElMeshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv. 2016 Sep;23(7):2115-2123. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.942811. Epub 2014 Jul 31. PMID: 25080226.
  60. Fahmy AM, El-Setouhy DA, Ibrahim AB, Habib BA, Tayel SA, Bayoumi NA. Penetration enhancer-containing spanlastics (PECSs) for transdermal delivery of haloperidol: in vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo biodistribution studies. Drug Deliv. 2018 Nov;25(1):12-22. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1410262. PMID: 29219628; PMCID: PMC6058714.
  61. Kumar L., Rana R., Kukreti G., Aggarwal V., Chaurasia H., Sharma P., Jyothiraditya V. Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes // Current Pharmaceutical Design. - 2024. - Vol. 30. - N. 28. - P. 2206-2221. doi: 10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  62. Rajab, N. A., Adulhussein, Y. M., Kadhim, E. J., … Abdulhamid, S. N. (2025). Spanelastic as a vesicular nanocarrier for transdermal drug delivery system: Preparation, characterization and bioactive loading. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 29(2), 833-840. https://doi.org/10.12991/jrespharm.1666368.
  63. El Hosary R, Teaima MH, El-Nabarawi M, Yousry Y, Eltahan M, Bakr A, Aboelela H, Abdelmonem R, Nassif RM. Topical delivery of extracted curcumin as curcumin loaded spanlastics anti-aging gel: Optimization using experimental design and ex-vivo evaluation. Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Jan;32(1):101912. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101912. Epub 2023 Dec 9. PMID: 38178851; PMCID: PMC10765109.
  64. Sayyad M, Sutar AD, Shivhare K, Shukla R, Flora SJS. Silymarin as a phytopharmaceutical agent: advances in mechanistic insights, formulation strategies, and pre-clinical applications. Front Pharmacol. 2025 Nov 27;16:1711653. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1711653. PMID: 41394134; PMCID: PMC12695834.
  65. Kumar L., Rana R., Kukreti G., Aggarwal V., Chaurasia H., Sharma P., Jyothiraditya V. Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes // Current Pharmaceutical Design. - 2024. - Vol. 30. - N. 28. - P. 2206-2221. doi: 10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  66. Annisa, R. (2025a). Spanlastic as a Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Systematic review. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, 18(1), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3099
  67. Kumar L., Rana R., Kukreti G., Aggarwal V., Chaurasia H., Sharma P., Jyothiraditya V. Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes // Current Pharmaceutical Design. - 2024. - Vol. 30. - N. 28. - P. 2206-2221. doi: 10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  68. El Hosary R, Teaima MH, El-Nabarawi M, Yousry Y, Eltahan M, Bakr A, Aboelela H, Abdelmonem R, Nassif RM. Topical delivery of extracted curcumin as curcumin loaded spanlastics anti-aging gel: Optimization using experimental design and ex-vivo evaluation. Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Jan;32(1):101912. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101912. Epub 2023 Dec 9. PMID: 38178851; PMCID: PMC10765109.
  69. Rajab, N. A., Adulhussein, Y. M., Kadhim, E. J., … Abdulhamid, S. N. (2025). Spanelastic as a vesicular nanocarrier for transdermal drug delivery system: Preparation, characterization and bioactive loading. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 29(2), 833-840. https://doi.org/10.12991/jrespharm.1666368.
  70. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.
  71. Elhabak M, Ibrahim S, Abouelatta SM. Topical delivery of l-ascorbic acid spanlastics for stability enhancement and treatment of UVB induced damaged skin. Drug Deliv. 2021 Dec;28(1):445-453. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1886377. PMID: 33620008; PMCID: PMC7909477.
  72. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  73. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  74. Annisa, R. (2025c). Spanlastic as a Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Systematic review. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, 18(1), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3099.
  75. Mohamed, N. W., Sabry, S. A., Mahdy, M. A., & Faisal, M. M. (2024). Tailoring of spanlastics for promoting transdermal delivery of irbesartan: In vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo assessment. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 100, 106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106088.
  76. Alaaeldin E, Abou-Taleb HA, Mohamad SA, Elrehany M, Gaber SS, Mansour HF. Topical Nano-Vesicular Spanlastics of Celecoxib: Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effect and Down-Regulation of TNF-α, NF-?B and COX-2 in Complete Freund’s Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model in Rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:133-145

https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S289828.

  1. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  2. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.
  3. Badria F, Mazyed E. Formulation of Nanospanlastics as a Promising Approach for ‎Improving the Topical Delivery of a Natural Leukotriene Inhibitor (3-‎Acetyl-11-Keto-β-Boswellic Acid): Statistical Optimization, in vitro ‎Characterization, and ex vivo Permeation Study. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Sep 15;14:3697-3721. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S265167. PMID: 32982176; PMCID: PMC7501970.
  4. Kumar, L., Rana, R., Kukreti, G., Aggarwal, V., Chaurasia, H., Sharma, P., & Jyothiraditya, V. (2024). Overview of Spanlastics: A Groundbreaking Elastic Medication Delivery Device with Versatile Prospects for Administration via Various Routes. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 30(28), 2206–2221.   https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128313398240613063019.
  5. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  6. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.
  7. Almohamady HI, Mortagi Y, Gad S, Zaitone S, Alshaman R, Alattar A, Alanazi FE, Hanna PA. Spanlastic Nano-Vesicles: A Novel Approach to Improve the Dissolution, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Famotidine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;17(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ph17121614. PMID: 39770456; PMCID: PMC11678360.
  8. El-Shenawy AA, Abd Elkarim RA, Mahmoud RA, Ramadan AEH, Alamri AH, Abdelkader H, Elafify MS, Mahmoud EA, Saddik MS, Mohamed MS. Zaleplon nanospanlastics loaded transdermal patches: formulation, optimization, ex-vivo permeation, and in-vivo studies. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2025 Nov 5;28:15406. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2025.15406. PMID: 41268063; PMCID: PMC12626903.
  9. Alaaeldin E, Abou-Taleb HA, Mohamad SA, Elrehany M, Gaber SS, Mansour HF. Topical Nano-Vesicular Spanlastics of Celecoxib: Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effect and Down-Regulation of TNF-α, NF-?B and COX-2 in Complete Freund’s Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model in Rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:133-145
  1. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S289828
  1. Agha OA, Girgis GNS, El-Sokkary MMA, Soliman OAE. Spanlastic-laden in situ gel as a promising approach for ocular delivery of Levofloxacin: In-vitro characterization, microbiological assessment, corneal permeability and in-vivo study. Int J Pharm X. 2023 Jul 24;6:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100201. PMID: 37560488; PMCID: PMC10407905.

Photo
Keshav Maurya
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacy, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University Bareilly 243006 U.P. India

Photo
Sobhna Singh
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University Bareilly 243001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Photo
Neha
Co-author

Department of Pharmacy, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University Bareilly 243001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Keshav Maurya, Sobhna Singh, Neha, Revolutionizing Drug Delivery: Spanlastics as Adaptive Nanovesicular Platforms for Multimodal Therapeutics, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 4862-4879, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19909752

More related articles
To Formulate and Evaluate a Natural Healing Ointme...
Nutan sahu , Aayushi Prasad, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu...
A Review on Permeation Enhancer of Microemulsion G...
Syed Saif Ullah , Dr. Deepesh Lall, Dr. Ritesh Jain, Anil Kumar M...
Review Article on Novel Drug Delivery System ...
Dr. C. S. Parameswari, K.Mounika, B Manasa, N.Navya sree , M.Srey...
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-acne Herbal Gel...
Arun Kumar K. V., Jusaira Abdul Jabbar, Sayooj V., Aromal M., Anakha S., Mufeeda, ...
A Comprehensive Review On Emulgel As A Topical Drug Delivery System...
Niraj Gaikwad, Ritesh Aher, Mayuri Bagul, Yogesh Sharma, Dhanajay Patil, Deepak Sonawane, ...
Related Articles
The Pharmacological Induction of Cuproptosis: A Novel Strategy for Targeting Dru...
Bijoy Ghosh, Anurag Biswas, Nancy, Hildegatha Mgaya, Meckie Khaliz Chapola, Saurav Kumar, ...
Cutting edge Techniques for Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A bri...
Aditi A Kokande, Sanket S Gite, Nikit S Thakare , Aniket B Bairagi, Shubham R Jadhav, Himmat D Sawan...
Design of Gut Microbiome-Responsive Nanoparticles for Targeted Drug Release in I...
Mr Abdul Tanveer Abdul Khalique Patel , Rohit Girhepunje, Gopulwad Madhav Hanmant, Shaikh Mohmmad ib...
To Formulate and Evaluate a Natural Healing Ointment from Terminalia Chebula Her...
Nutan sahu , Aayushi Prasad, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, ...
More related articles
To Formulate and Evaluate a Natural Healing Ointment from Terminalia Chebula Her...
Nutan sahu , Aayushi Prasad, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, ...
A Review on Permeation Enhancer of Microemulsion Gels for Transdermal Drug Deliv...
Syed Saif Ullah , Dr. Deepesh Lall, Dr. Ritesh Jain, Anil Kumar Manhar, Vivek Kumar Sinha, ...
Review Article on Novel Drug Delivery System ...
Dr. C. S. Parameswari, K.Mounika, B Manasa, N.Navya sree , M.Sreya, M.Rajeswari, E. Anusha, ...
To Formulate and Evaluate a Natural Healing Ointment from Terminalia Chebula Her...
Nutan sahu , Aayushi Prasad, Fiza Nazreen, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, ...
A Review on Permeation Enhancer of Microemulsion Gels for Transdermal Drug Deliv...
Syed Saif Ullah , Dr. Deepesh Lall, Dr. Ritesh Jain, Anil Kumar Manhar, Vivek Kumar Sinha, ...
Review Article on Novel Drug Delivery System ...
Dr. C. S. Parameswari, K.Mounika, B Manasa, N.Navya sree , M.Sreya, M.Rajeswari, E. Anusha, ...