View Article

Abstract

Oral liquid medications, comprising both monophasic (solutions, syrups) and biphasic (suspensions, emulsions) systems, are essential pharmaceutical dosage forms. They provide ease of administration for pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic patients, leading to high patient compliance and superior rapid absorption/bioavailability compared to solid dosage forms. A critical hurdle in their development is the poor aqueous solubility of over $40\%$ of new drug candidates. Conventional formulation methods often fail to adequately enhance the dissolution and absorption of these drugs. To overcome severe bioavailability issues for poorly water-soluble compounds (BCS Class II and IV), pharmaceutical scientists utilize nanosuspension technology. This technique involves reducing the drug particle size to the nanometer range, which achieves a massive increase in surface area. According to the Noyes-Whitney equation, this proportionally increases the dissolution rate, effectively mimicking the performance of a soluble drug while retaining the stability advantages of a suspension. This approach is particularly effective for "brick dust" drugs—those insoluble in both aqueous and organic solvents. The methodology for producing high-quality oral liquids adheres to stringent criteria across four main areas: Robust Stability, High Patient Acceptance, Ease of Dosing, and Optimal Biopharmaceutical Performance. Furthermore, taste masking is a critical challenge addressed through strategies like maintaining the drug in an insoluble form (suspension) via pH control or applying polymer coatings (e.g., Ethyl cellulose) to the drug particles to shield them from taste receptors. The application of these advanced methods ensures the development of safe, stable, and highly effective liquid medicines.

Keywords

Oral liquid medications, Patient compliance, Nanosuspension technology, Dissolution rate, Ease of Dosing

Introduction

Oral liquid medications are vital pharmaceutical formulations, making up about 90% of the global drug market and offering numerous benefits for patient care and convenience.

Key Facts and Advantages of Oral Liquids

Oral liquid dosage forms (like solutions, syrups, and suspensions) are widely preferred for several reasons:

  • Ease of Administration: They are ideal for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets or capsules, such as children (pediatric), the elderly (geriatric), and patients with swallowing disorders (dysphagia).
  • Rapid Absorption and Bioavailability: Since the active drug is already dissolved or highly dispersed, liquids often have an improved dissolution rate and faster absorption, which enhances the drug's effectiveness (bioavailability), particularly for drugs that are poorly soluble as solids.
  • High Compliance: Patient adherence is generally higher with oral liquids than with injections or inhalers.
  • Palatability: The liquid medium can be easily modified with sweeteners and flavoring to mask unpleasant tastes and boost patient compliance.
  • Targeting: Drugs administered orally can be formulated to specifically target regions of the GI tract for localized treatment of conditions like ulcers, inflammation, and certain cancers.
  • Market Dominance: Oral formulations are the most common and cost-effective method of drug delivery, accounting for roughly $35 billion in value among top-selling products.

Fig 1.ORAL DOSAGE FORM

Classification and Formulation Challenges

Oral liquids are primarily classified by their composition:

  • Monophasic Liquids: Contain only one phase (e.g., syrups, elixirs).
  • Biphasic Liquids: Contain two distinct phases (e.g., suspensions, emulsions).

The Challenge of Poor Solubility

A major hurdle in drug development is that over 40% of new drug candidates are poorly soluble in water. Formulating these drugs is complex, as many conventional methods (like salt formation, using co-solvents, or micronization) are not universally effective.

Nanotechnology Solution

To overcome solubility and absorption issues (especially for drugs classified as BCS Class II or IV), pharmaceutical scientists are turning to nanotechnology.

  • Nanosuspensions, which involve reducing drug particles to the nanometer size, are a promising approach. This technique is particularly effective for highly lipophilic drugs (high) or those insoluble in both aqueous and organic solvents, offering a way to significantly enhance solubility and facilitate absorption across the GI barrier.

Fig 2: NANOSUSPENSION DOSAGE FORM

CLASSIFICATION:

Fig 3: CLASSIFICATION OF LIQUID DOSAGE FORM

IDEAL PROPERTIES:

A high-quality oral liquid formulation must satisfy strict criteria across four main areas: stability, patient acceptance, ease of use, and therapeutic efficacy.

1. Robust Stability and Integrity

The liquid must maintain its quality and potency over time.

  • Chemical Integrity: The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) must not degrade. This requires the liquid's pH to be precisely maintained at the level that ensures maximum drug stability.
  • Physical Uniformity (Homogeneity):
    • Solutions/Syrups must remain clear without any sign of settled material or cloudiness.
    • Suspensions must settle slowly, and any sediment formed must be easily and fully re-dispersed with simple shaking (no caking).
    • Emulsions must remain as a single well-mixed unit, resisting phase separation (like creaming or cracking).
  • Microbial Resistance: The product must be protected from contamination and growth of bacteria, yeast, and mold, typically through the incorporation of effective preservatives.

2. High Patient Acceptance (Organoleptic Quality)

The medication must be palatable to ensure patients, especially vulnerable groups like children and the elderly, complete their treatment.

  • Palatability: The taste must be acceptable or pleasant. Formulators must successfully mask any bitter or unpleasant flavors from the drug using appropriate sweeteners and flavorings.
  • Visual Appeal: The liquid should possess an attractive, uniform color and an overall pleasant appearance.
  • Odor: The scent must be acceptable and complementary to the chosen flavor.

3. Ease of Administration and Accurate Dosing

The product must be convenient and reliable for daily use.

  • Swallowability: The liquid's thickness (viscosity) must be easy to pour and effortless to swallow, making it suitable for patients who have trouble with pills.
  • Dosing Accuracy: The formulation must allow for the precise and reproducible measurement of a dose using the provided dispensing device (e.g., dropper or syringe).
  • Pourability: The viscosity should be optimized—thick enough for stability (e.g., to prevent suspension particles from settling too quickly), but fluid enough to pour easily from the bottle without being excessively sticky.

4. Optimal Biopharmaceutical Performance

The medicine must deliver the drug effectively for the intended therapeutic action.

  • Bioavailability: The drug should be quickly and predictably available for absorption into the bloodstream. Liquids generally offer a faster onset of action than solid forms.
  • Safety and Tolerance: The formulation must be non-toxic, non-irritating, and non-sensitizing to the patient's tissues.
  • Component Compatibility: All inactive ingredients (excipients) must be chemically inert and perfectly compatible with the active drug and the container to prevent unexpected reactions or degradation.
  • RATIONALE

A. Addressing Formulation and Stability Challenges

  • For Insoluble Drugs: Suspensions are the only viable liquid option when a drug is insoluble or poorly soluble in common pharmaceutical solvents (like water). The drug is dispersed as solid particles instead of being dissolved.
  • To Improve Chemical Stability: Many drugs degrade quickly when fully dissolved in water. By keeping the drug in its solid, undissolved state (often as a dry powder reconstituted just before use), suspensions protect the drug from chemical breakdown, significantly increasing its shelf-life.

B. Enhancing Patient Experience and Functionality

  • To Mask Unpleasant Taste: Making the drug into an insoluble suspension is an effective way to mask bitter or objectionable tastes. The drug particles interact less with taste buds, improving the palatability, especially for pediatric patients.
  • For Ease of Administration: Suspensions are a necessary liquid alternative for patients (children, the elderly, or those with swallowing difficulties) who cannot take solid dosage forms like tablets or capsules.
  • To Control Action: They can be designed to provide sustained or prolonged action (depot effect), particularly in injectable forms, as the particles slowly dissolve in the body over time.
  • To Enhance Bioavailability (over Solids): Because the drug is already delivered in a finely divided powder state, its absorption is often faster than from a solid tablet or capsule.
  • Specialized Uses: Suspensions are essential for topical lotions, certain vaccines, and X-ray contrast agents (e.g., Barium sulfate)

The rationale for developing a nanosuspension goes beyond the above points. It is specifically aimed at overcoming severe bioavailability issues for extremely poor water-soluble drugs by leveraging the principles of nanotechnology. The goal is to achieve high absorption of a solution while keeping the stability of a suspension.

1. Massive Bioavailability and Dissolution Enhancement

  • Increased Surface Area: Reducing the particle size to the nanometer range causes an enormous increase in the total surface area. Since the dissolution rate is directly proportional to surface area (Noyes-Whitney equation), this leads to rapid dissolution that mimics a soluble drug.
  • Increased Solubility: The ultra-small size also fundamentally increases the drug's saturation solubility (Ostwald-Freundlich effect), further accelerating absorption.

2. Versatility for Difficult Drugs

  • Solving the "Brick Dust" Problem: Nanosuspensions are ideal for drugs that are poorly soluble in both water and organic solvents, which are often impossible to formulate using traditional methods.
  • High Drug Load: They consist almost entirely of pure drug nanocrystals, allowing for a very high concentration of the active ingredient in a small dose volume.

3. Improved Pharmacokinetic Profile

  • Faster Onset: The rapid dissolution leads to faster absorption and a quicker time to therapeutic effect.
  • Reduced Food Effect: Enhanced absorption can lessen the impact of food on the drug's uptake, leading to more consistent dosing.
  • Passive Targeting: In some applications (like cancer therapy), the nanoparticles can preferentially accumulate at disease sites (Enhanced Permeability and Retention - EPR effect).

4. Route of Administration Flexibility

Nanosuspensions enable safer and more effective delivery through various routes:

  • Intravenous (IV): Allows for the IV injection of poorly soluble drugs without toxic co-solvents, significantly improving safety.
  • Other Routes: The small, non-irritating particle size is suitable for specialized delivery via ocular, pulmonary, or topical routes.

5. Conversion to Stable Solid Forms

The nanosuspension liquid can be dried (e.g., by freeze-drying or spray-drying) to produce solid-state nanocrystal formulations (tablets, capsules) with excellent long-term stability and high patient compliance.

METHODOLOGY:

The methodology for oral liquid formulations involves a systematic approach to designing, preparing, and evaluating liquid medications that are administered by mouth. These formulations, which include solutions, suspensions, emulsions, syrups, elixirs, linctus, oral drops, and mixtures, are designed for patients who may have challenges swallowing solid forms like tablets or capsules, such as pediatric or geriatric patients.vicihealthsciences+2?

Key Steps in Oral Liquid Methodology

  • Formulation Design: This involves selecting the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and suitable excipients (like solvents, sweeteners, preservatives, flavorings, and colorants) that are compatible and stable together, ensuring overall safety, efficacy, and palatability of the product.hello-pharma?
  • Solubility and Compatibility: The API and excipients should be soluble or compatible for suspensions or emulsions, ensuring a stable and homogeneous preparation.hello-pharma?
  • Preparation and Mixing: Depending on the type of oral liquid, the product may be a solution (fully dissolved API), suspension (finely dispersed API), or emulsion (two-phase system, such as oil-in-water). Advanced mixing and homogenization techniques are used to achieve uniformity and stability.
  • Stability Testing: Rigorous physical, chemical, and microbiological stability studies are conducted to ensure the oral liquid maintains its quality over time.hello-pharma?
  • Packaging and Labeling: The prepared liquid is filled into appropriate containers, sealed, and labeled with essential information for safe use.

Here are some common mixing techniques:

1. Homogenization:

  • Homogenization ensures the uniform distribution of the API and excipients throughout the formulation. High shear mixers or homogenizers are commonly used for this purpose.

2. Agitation:

  • Agitation is essential for achieving proper dissolution and preventing the settling of solid particles. Magnetic stirrers or propeller mixers are frequently used for this step.

3. Shear Mixing:

  • Shear mixers generate a controlled flow pattern, aiding in the dispersion of insoluble components.

4. Ultrasonication:

  • Ultrasonication uses high-frequency sound waves to create intense agitation, facilitating dissolution and dispersion of ingredients.

5. Batch Size Considerations:

  • Adjust mixing parameters (speed, time, etc.) based on the batch size to ensure uniformity.

In nano-suspension some common techniques:

Fig 4.NANOSUSPENSION PREPARATION TECHNIQUES (a)

Nanosuspension preparation techniques are generally categorized into two main approaches: Top-Down Technologies and Bottom-Up Technologies. The goal of both is to reduce the drug particle size to the nanoscale (typically below 1 /mu m) to enhance dissolution rate, solubility, and ultimately, bioavailability, especially for poorly water-soluble drugs.

Here is a detailed breakdown of the main techniques:

Fig 5.NANOSUSPENSION PREPARATION TECHNIQUES (b)

I. Top-Down Technologies (Size Reduction)

These techniques start with larger drug particles and reduce their size through mechanical forces. They are the most common methods used commercially.

1. High-Pressure Homogenization (HPH)

This is a very popular and scalable technique.

Process: The drug powder is first dispersed in an aqueous solution containing stabilizers (surfactants and/or polymers) to form a pre-suspension.

This pre-suspension is subjected to very high pressure (up to 2000 bar) as it is forced through a narrow gap (homogenization valve).

The fluid accelerates to a very high velocity, leading to particle size reduction primarily through cavitation (formation and implosion of vapor bubbles), shear forces, and particle collision. The process is repeated for multiple cycles (e.g., 10-25 cycles) until the desired particle size is achieved.

Fig 6. HIGH-PRESSURE HOMOGENIZATION METHOD

Variants:

DissoCubes® Technology: Uses a gap homogenizer (like a piston-gap homogenizer) under high pressure.

NanoPure® Technology: Often used interchangeably with HPH.

2. Media Milling (Wet Milling)

This is another commercially established technique.

Process: The drug, along with a stabilizer, is placed in a milling chamber containing small, high-density milling media (e.g., polymer-coated ceramic or glass beads).

The media are agitated at high speed by an impeller or rotor.

Particle size reduction occurs due to the continuous impact, attrition (rubbing), and shear between the drug particles, the milling media, and the mill wall.

A cooling system is necessary to dissipate the heat generated during the milling process.

Fig 7. Media Milling (Wet Milling) Method

Advantages: Can achieve very fine particle sizes and is highly scalable.

3. Dry Milling (e.g., Jet Milling, Pearl Milling)

Process: Used to reduce particle size of solid materials without a liquid vehicle, but typically only achieves particle sizes down to the micron range, sometimes requiring further processing (like wet milling or HPH) to reach the nano range.

Fig 8.  Dry Milling (e.g., Jet Milling) Method

II. Bottom-Up Technologies (Particle Assembly)

These techniques involve dissolving the drug and then precipitating it out in the presence of stabilizers to control crystal growth, resulting in nanosized particles.

1. Precipitation Method (Antisolvent Precipitation)

Process: The drug is dissolved in an appropriate organic solvent (which is usually water-miscible).

This drug solution is rapidly added, often drop-wise, into an excess volume of a non-solvent (antisolvent), typically water containing a suitable stabilizer.

The rapid mixing causes supersaturation of the drug in the non-solvent medium, leading to nucleation and controlled crystal growth, resulting in the formation of a nanosuspension.

Fig 9. Precipitation Method (Antisolvent Precipitation) Method

Key Challenge: The presence of residual organic solvents can be a concern and must be minimized or removed.

2. Emulsion/ Microemulsion as Template Method

Process: The drug is dissolved in the oil phase of an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion, which is stabilized by surfactants.

A large volume of non-solvent (water) is added to the emulsion to extract and/or evaporate the solvent, causing the drug to precipitate out as nanosized particles within the aqueous phase.

Fig 10. Emulsion/ Microemulsion as Template Method

For microemulsion templates, a thermodynamically stable, transparent microemulsion is formed first. The drug precipitates upon dilution with the non-solvent.

Advantages: Can produce very small and uniform particle sizes.

3. Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Techniques

These methods use supercritical fluids, like supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO_2), as a solvent, anti-solvent, or dispersion medium.

Common Variants:

RESS (Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solution): The drug is dissolved in scCO_2, and the solution is rapidly expanded through a nozzle into a chamber at lower pressure. The sudden drop in pressure causes the drug to precipitate instantly as fine particles.

SAS (Supercritical Antisolvent): scCO_2 is used as an anti-solvent. A solution of the drug in an organic solvent is sprayed into scCO_2. The scCO_2 rapidly extracts the organic solvent, causing the drug to precipitate as nanoparticles.

Fig 11. Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Technique

QUALITY CONTROL TESTS:

In-Process Quality Control (IPQC) Tests

IPQC Test

Purpose/ Objective

Key Procedure/ Device Used

Rationale for Test

Appearance/ Phase Test

To ensure the purity and quality of the raw materials (dispersed phase and medium).

Visual inspection; Monitoring of water quality, syrup purity, and gum dispersion consistency.

Ensures the fundamental components meet standards before mixing to prevent defects in the final product.

Rheological Tests

To guarantee the medium has the desired viscosity for stability and re-dispersibility.

The Brookfield Viscometer is used to determine viscosity.

Viscosity must be optimized to slow down sedimentation but allow for easy redispersion.

Particle Size of Dispersed Phase Test

To ensure the drug particles are the optimum size for final product stability and dissolution.

Microscopic analysis of particle size distribution.

Particle size significantly impacts the sedimentation rate and dissolution rate, affecting both stability and bioavailability.

Pourability Test

To check that the final formulation is easily pourable for filling and patient handling.

Checking the ease of flow of the formulation.

Ensures patient compliance and prevents difficulties during the industrial filling process.

pH Test

To monitor and maintain the crucial pH of the formulation.

Use of a pH meter on different phases and the final mixture; Timely record keeping.

The pH is critical for the chemical stability of the drug and the physical stability of the dispersed system.

Final Product Assay Test (Homogeneity)

To ensure the active component is uniformly distributed throughout the formulation.

Withdrawing a sample and performing an Assay (content analysis).

Verifies homogeneity; essential for accurate dosing and patient safety.

Zeta Potential Management

To determine the future physical stability of the suspension.

Microelectrophoresis or a Zeta Meter device.

Zeta potential relates to the electrostatic repulsion between particles; a high value (positive or negative) usually indicates a more stable suspension.

Centrifugation Test

To determine the physical stability under stress conditions.

Centrifuging a sample at high speed, examining for sedimentation/caking.

Accelerates the sedimentation process to predict long-term stability quickly; also used to check for air globules and uniform color before packaging.

CHALLENGES/ CRITICAL THINKING:

Polymer coating of drug suspension:

Polymer Coating helps the patient perceive the taste of the formulation by swallowing the drug particles before the threshold concentration is reached in the mouth. Ethyl cellulose, Eudragit RS 100, as well as Eudragit RS 30 D, and some other polymers are used for coating purposes. This process is commonly used for the preparation of reconstitutable powders or dry powder drugs , which are converted into suspension by mixing with a liquid ,vehicle such as water , just before use. These re-constituted powders coated by polymers have a long shelf-life.[25]

Encapsulation with basic substance:

In this process , a drug with a bitter taste is mixed with a basic substance. After that, this mixture is encapsulated with polymers (cellulose derivatives, vinyl derivatives ,etc.). Now this encapsulated product is suspended and dispersed a suspending medium to obtain a final product.[26]

Coating and pH control:

In  the pH control method, those drugs that are soluble at low pH, are preferably maintained in suspension at a high pH where the drug particles are insoluble and ,vice versa. By applying polymeric coating, we can avoid the solubilization of the drug, and taste masking can also be achieved[27]

REFERENCE

  1. Batchelor, H. (2013). “Formulations for children: problems and solutions.” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 79(3): 405-418.
  2. Gautami, J. (2016). “Liquid Dosage Forms.” India Nano Science & Nano Technology: An Indian Journal, 10(3): 0974-7491.
  3. Bhattarai, M., Gupta, A. K. (2015). “Fast Dissolving Oral Films: A Novel Trend to Oral Drug Delivery System.” Dharan1 Sunsari Technical College Journal, 2(1): 58-68, 2091-2102.
  4. Homayun, B., Lin, X., Choi, H-J. (2019). “Challenges and Recent Progress in Oral Drug Delivery Systems for Biopharmaceuticals.” Pharmaceutics, 11(3): 1999-4923.
  5. Gaikwad, P. V., Joshi, D. A., Bavage, S. B., Bavage, N. B. (2021). “Monophasic Liquid Dosage Form.” International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 2(10): 512-515.
  6. Gayathri, P. (2016). “A mini review on Oral dosage forms.” India: Research and Reviews: Journal, 2319-9849.
  7. Karde, H. V., Rathod, S. B., Kohale, N. B. (2023). “A Comprehensive Review on Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT), 3(2).
  8. Gupta, A., Kumar, M. (2022). “A comprehensive review of pharmaceutical dosage forms.” ACTA scientific pharmaceutical sciences, 6(4): 2581-5423
  9. Mudgil M, Gupta N, Nagpal M, Pawar P. Nanotechnology: A New Approach For Ocular Drug Delivery System. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2012;4(2):105–12.
  10. Koteshwara KB. Nanosuspension: A Novel Drug Delivery Approach. IJRAP 2011;2(1):162–5.
  11. Nagaraju P. Nanosuspension: A Promising Drug Delivery System. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology 2010;2(4):679–84.
  12. Srinivasa RK. An Overview of Statins as Hypolipidemic Drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research 2011;3(3):178–83.
  13. Bhargavi A. Technical Review of Nanosuspensions. International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology 2011;3(3):1503 11.
  14. Paun JS. Nanosuspension: An Emerging Trend for Bioavailability Enhancement of Poorly Soluble Drugs. Asian J Pharm Tech 2012;2(4):157–68.
  15. Venkatesh T. Nanosuspensions: Ideal Approach for the Drug Delivery of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. 2011;3(2):203–13.
  16. Abd El-Salam M. H., El-Shibiny S. (2012). Formation and potential uses of milk proteins as nano delivery vehicles for nutraceuticals: a review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 65 (1), 13–21. 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00737.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ahn H., Park J. H. (2016). Liposomal delivery systems for intestinal lymphatic drug transport. Biomater. Res. 20 (1), 36. 10.1186/s40824-016-0083-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Alqahtani M. S., Podaralla S., Kaushik R. S., Reineke J., Woyengo T., et al. (2017). Food protein-based core-shell nanocarriers for oral drug delivery: effect of shell composition on in Vitro and in Vivo functional performance of Zein nanocarriers. Mol. Pharmaceut. 14 (3), 757–769. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Alqahtani M. S. A.Alqahtani A. S. A., Baji R. S. S. (2019). Method of synthesizing lignin-based nanocompositions. Google Patents. [Google Scholar]
  20. Alqahtani M. S. Alqahtani A., Al-Thabit A., Roni M., Syed R. (2019). Novel lignin nanoparticles for oral drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B. 7 (28), 4461–4473. 10.1039/c9tb00594c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ameer B., Weintraub R. A. (1997). Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Clin Pharmacokinet. 33 (2), 103–121. 10.2165/00003088-199733020-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Amidon G. L., Lennernas H., Shah V. P., Crison J. R. (1995). A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 12 (3), 413–420. 10.1023/a:1016212804288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Aungst B. J. (2012). Absorption enhancers: applications and advances. Aaps J. 14 (1), 10–18. 10.1208/s12248-011-9307-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gupta, V., Sharma, S. P., Chaurasia, D. K., Shukla, T. P. (2023). “Formulation Development of Liquid Dosage Form.” International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(1): 2321-9653.
  25. Bhowmik D, Harish G, Duraivel S, Kumar BP, Raghuvanshi V, Kumar KS. Nanosuspension  A novel approach in drug delivery systems. Pharma Innovation. 2013;1(12):50.
  26. Yadav GV, Singh SR. Nanosuspension: A promising drug delivery system. Pharmacophore. 2012;3(5):217-43.
  27. Sprockel OL, Price JC. Evaluation of sustained release aqueous suspensions containing microencapsulated drug-resin complexes. Drug DevInd Pharm. 1989;15(8):1275-8

Reference

  1. Batchelor, H. (2013). “Formulations for children: problems and solutions.” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 79(3): 405-418.
  2. Gautami, J. (2016). “Liquid Dosage Forms.” India Nano Science & Nano Technology: An Indian Journal, 10(3): 0974-7491.
  3. Bhattarai, M., Gupta, A. K. (2015). “Fast Dissolving Oral Films: A Novel Trend to Oral Drug Delivery System.” Dharan1 Sunsari Technical College Journal, 2(1): 58-68, 2091-2102.
  4. Homayun, B., Lin, X., Choi, H-J. (2019). “Challenges and Recent Progress in Oral Drug Delivery Systems for Biopharmaceuticals.” Pharmaceutics, 11(3): 1999-4923.
  5. Gaikwad, P. V., Joshi, D. A., Bavage, S. B., Bavage, N. B. (2021). “Monophasic Liquid Dosage Form.” International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 2(10): 512-515.
  6. Gayathri, P. (2016). “A mini review on Oral dosage forms.” India: Research and Reviews: Journal, 2319-9849.
  7. Karde, H. V., Rathod, S. B., Kohale, N. B. (2023). “A Comprehensive Review on Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT), 3(2).
  8. Gupta, A., Kumar, M. (2022). “A comprehensive review of pharmaceutical dosage forms.” ACTA scientific pharmaceutical sciences, 6(4): 2581-5423
  9. Mudgil M, Gupta N, Nagpal M, Pawar P. Nanotechnology: A New Approach For Ocular Drug Delivery System. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2012;4(2):105–12.
  10. Koteshwara KB. Nanosuspension: A Novel Drug Delivery Approach. IJRAP 2011;2(1):162–5.
  11. Nagaraju P. Nanosuspension: A Promising Drug Delivery System. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology 2010;2(4):679–84.
  12. Srinivasa RK. An Overview of Statins as Hypolipidemic Drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research 2011;3(3):178–83.
  13. Bhargavi A. Technical Review of Nanosuspensions. International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology 2011;3(3):1503 11.
  14. Paun JS. Nanosuspension: An Emerging Trend for Bioavailability Enhancement of Poorly Soluble Drugs. Asian J Pharm Tech 2012;2(4):157–68.
  15. Venkatesh T. Nanosuspensions: Ideal Approach for the Drug Delivery of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. 2011;3(2):203–13.
  16. Abd El-Salam M. H., El-Shibiny S. (2012). Formation and potential uses of milk proteins as nano delivery vehicles for nutraceuticals: a review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 65 (1), 13–21. 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00737.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ahn H., Park J. H. (2016). Liposomal delivery systems for intestinal lymphatic drug transport. Biomater. Res. 20 (1), 36. 10.1186/s40824-016-0083-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Alqahtani M. S., Podaralla S., Kaushik R. S., Reineke J., Woyengo T., et al. (2017). Food protein-based core-shell nanocarriers for oral drug delivery: effect of shell composition on in Vitro and in Vivo functional performance of Zein nanocarriers. Mol. Pharmaceut. 14 (3), 757–769. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Alqahtani M. S. A.Alqahtani A. S. A., Baji R. S. S. (2019). Method of synthesizing lignin-based nanocompositions. Google Patents. [Google Scholar]
  20. Alqahtani M. S. Alqahtani A., Al-Thabit A., Roni M., Syed R. (2019). Novel lignin nanoparticles for oral drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B. 7 (28), 4461–4473. 10.1039/c9tb00594c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ameer B., Weintraub R. A. (1997). Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Clin Pharmacokinet. 33 (2), 103–121. 10.2165/00003088-199733020-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Amidon G. L., Lennernas H., Shah V. P., Crison J. R. (1995). A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 12 (3), 413–420. 10.1023/a:1016212804288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Aungst B. J. (2012). Absorption enhancers: applications and advances. Aaps J. 14 (1), 10–18. 10.1208/s12248-011-9307-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gupta, V., Sharma, S. P., Chaurasia, D. K., Shukla, T. P. (2023). “Formulation Development of Liquid Dosage Form.” International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(1): 2321-9653.
  25. Bhowmik D, Harish G, Duraivel S, Kumar BP, Raghuvanshi V, Kumar KS. Nanosuspension  A novel approach in drug delivery systems. Pharma Innovation. 2013;1(12):50.
  26. Yadav GV, Singh SR. Nanosuspension: A promising drug delivery system. Pharmacophore. 2012;3(5):217-43.
  27. Sprockel OL, Price JC. Evaluation of sustained release aqueous suspensions containing microencapsulated drug-resin complexes. Drug DevInd Pharm. 1989;15(8):1275-8

Photo
Vaishnavi Gunjal
Corresponding author

Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Loni, Maharashtra, India-413736 

Photo
Payal Gawali
Co-author

Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Loni, Maharashtra, India-413736 

Photo
Vikas Gore
Co-author

Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Loni, Maharashtra, India-413736 

Photo
Siddharth Guldagad
Co-author

Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Loni, Maharashtra, India-413736 

Photo
Vaibhav Gunjkar
Co-author

Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Loni, Maharashtra, India-413736 

Payal Gawali, Vaishnavi Gunjal, Vikas Gore, Siddharth Guldagad, Vaibhav Gunjkar, Nanosuspensions for Improved Drug Delivery: A Review of Preparation Methods and Applications., Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 2693-2707. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17641600

More related articles
Impact of Hair Setting Spray on Scalp Health: A Co...
Gaike Shubham , MiDube S. B., Dr. Kawade R. M., ...
Formulation And Evolution of Herbal Capsule for Se...
Komal Chavan, Akanksha Bhaskar Mahajan, Madhavi Ashok Kakphale, R...
Herbal Remedies with Hypolipidemic and Anti-Diabet...
Ritesh Dhas, Vivek Desai, Harshal Wale, Swapnil Sande, Aniket Mal...
A Review on Drug Approval Process in USFDA...
Bharathi M., Gilbert Tony K., Pavithra R., Arasu T., Mahendiran K., Kannabirran V., Rajalingam D., G...
Related Articles
A Review Article On Hyperuricemia And Gout Disease...
Dnyaneshwari Kure, Komal Chavan, Kavita Kulkarni , Ashish Shalik Faltankar, ...
Extraction And Isolation Of Microcrystalline Cellulose From Sugarcane Bagasse An...
Chitralekha Gunaji Therkar, Vishal K. Biswas, Dharti S. Borkar, Ritik N. Chende, Priyanka R. Boratwa...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Skin Infection Care Cream...
Shashank Tiwari, Sushil Kumar Pal, Vaibhav Raj Pandey, ...
More related articles
Formulation And Evolution of Herbal Capsule for Sedative Treatment...
Komal Chavan, Akanksha Bhaskar Mahajan, Madhavi Ashok Kakphale, Rupali Vijay Kachkure, Shalini Kisan...
Herbal Remedies with Hypolipidemic and Anti-Diabetic Activities: Mechanisms and ...
Ritesh Dhas, Vivek Desai, Harshal Wale, Swapnil Sande, Aniket Malekar, ...
Formulation And Evolution of Herbal Capsule for Sedative Treatment...
Komal Chavan, Akanksha Bhaskar Mahajan, Madhavi Ashok Kakphale, Rupali Vijay Kachkure, Shalini Kisan...
Herbal Remedies with Hypolipidemic and Anti-Diabetic Activities: Mechanisms and ...
Ritesh Dhas, Vivek Desai, Harshal Wale, Swapnil Sande, Aniket Malekar, ...