View Article

Abstract

Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) have emerged as advanced lipid-based nanocarriers designed to overcome the inherent limitations of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), particularly low drug loading and drug expulsion during storage. This review focuses on imperfect crystal (Type I) NLCs, which are formulated by blending solid and liquid lipids to create disordered lipid matrices with nano-voids and amorphous regions. Such structural imperfections significantly enhance drug loading capacity, improve entrapment efficiency, and prevent drug expulsion caused by lipid polymorphic transitions. The article discusses the molecular and formulation-related causes of imperfect lattice formation and their impact on drug stability, release behavior, and bioavailability. Key characterization techniques including DSC, DLS, TEM, AFM, and SAXS are critically reviewed. Furthermore, the versatility of imperfect NLCs in developing solid, semisolid, and liquid dosage forms for oral, topical, and transdermal delivery is highlighted. Overall, imperfect NLCs represent a promising and versatile platform for efficient delivery of poorly soluble drugs.

Keywords

Nanostructured lipid carriers, Imperfect crystal lattice, Solid lipid nanoparticles, Lipid-based drug delivery, Drug loading efficiency, Controlled drug release, Bioavailability enhancement.

Introduction

Nanotechnology has profoundly impacted all technical fields over the past two decades, particularly pharmaceuticals. Despite advanced lipophilic drug delivery innovations, approximately 40% of lipophilic candidates fail due to solubility and stability challenges.

Pharmaceutical nanotechnology manipulates nanometric structures (1-1000 nm), unlocking unique properties like enhanced bioavailability and superior biological tissue interface contact unavailable at larger scales. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) represent reliable next-generation platforms for targeted drug administration.

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) popularized lymphatic absorption via chylomicron pathways but suffer critical limitations: low payload (10-20%), drug expulsion during storage, and high-water content. NLCs overcome these deficiencies through engineered matrices containing spatially incompatible solid-liquid lipid blends, creating imperfect crystal lattices that boost drug loading to 95% while preventing storage ejection.

Critically, NLCs maintain solid consistency at room/body temperature despite liquid lipid incorporation, achieved through controlled concentrations below solubility limits. Unlike fluid emulsions, NLCs efficiently immobilize drugs and prevent particle coalescence through their stable solid framework.

 

 

Figure 1: Nanostructured lipid carrier

NLCs strategically blend solid and liquid lipids while precisely controlling liquid lipid concentrations (<10% solubility limit) to preserve solid matrix integrity at room/body temperature. Unlike fluid emulsions prone to drug leaching and particle fusion, NLCs' stable solid framework efficiently immobilizes therapeutic payloads and prevents coalescence. [1,2]

CAUSES BEHIND IMPERFECT LATTICE

Primary Causes (Intrinsic molecular properties fundamentally preventing perfect crystallinity in NLC Type I matrices): These originate from lipid molecular architecture itself, creating unavoidable packing defects regardless of processing. [3]

  • Different Chain Lengths: Solid lipids have long straight chains (18-22 carbons, like tristearin). Liquid lipids have shorter chains (8-12 carbons, like Miglyol oil) or kinks from double bonds (oleic acid). Short chains leave empty "gaps" (2-5 Å spaces); kinks push chains apart. [4]

Result: crystal lattice can't form tight packing, creating nano-voids where drugs hide.

  • Glyceride Structural Polymorphism: Lipids contain mono/di/tri-glycerides (10-60% each). Mono/di forms have bent shapes vs. linear tri-glycerides, blocking perfect stacking. This keeps matrix loose with 15-25% more space. [5]

Secondary Causes (Formulation design amplifying primary defects): These leverage primary incompatibilities through controlled blending to maximize imperfect space.? [6]

  • Liquid Lipid Amount (1-20%): Small oil amounts dissolve then "separate out" during cooling, forming tiny oil pockets (10-50 nm) trapped in solid matrix. Too much oil (>25%) makes watery mess; too little acts like SLN. DSC shows melting peak splits/drops by 5-10°C. [7]
  • Cooling rate kinetics: Rapid cooling (10-50°C/min post-homogenization) kinetically freezes transient α-phases (hexagonal, high volume) before β-transition, preserving 15-25% amorphous clusters observable via XRD peak broadening. [8,9]

Tertiary Causes (Processing/environmental factors modulating imperfection stability):

  • High Pressure Mixing: Homogenization Shear Forces - High-pressure (1000-2000 bar, 3-10 cycles) disrupts nucleation, creating polydisperse embryonic crystals with surface defects; ultrasonication (20 kHz) induces cavitation microjets fracturing perfect domains. [1,10]
  • Surfactants on Surface: Tween 80/Span 80 (HLB 12-15) stick to particle edges, blocking crystal growth and letting liquid lipid "leak" to surface for better cell entry. Reduces recrystallization temperature by 5-10°C. [11,12]

IMPACTS OF IMPERFECT MATRICES                                                                                                                                              

Imperfect nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) fundamentally transform drug delivery by creating nano-voids and amorphous regions that outperform perfect structured NLCs with rigid crystalline order. [14]                                               

  • Enhanced Drug Loading Capacity                                                                  

 Nano-voids (3-15 nm) and amorphous clusters form from solid-liquid lipid spatial incompatibilities like Compritol®888 ATO: Oleic acid (85:15 ratio), disrupting perfect β-polymorph hexagonal packing (2.15 Å spacing) and expanding matrix free volume 15-40%. Salvi et al. (2019) demonstrated Type I imperfect NLCs achieving 75.15% entrapment efficiency (EE) versus perfect structured NLCs' ~45% EE. [13]

  • Prevention of Drug Expulsion During Storage                                                                                                                                                                            

Perfect NLCs undergo β→α polymorphic transitions creating expulsion stress points; imperfect matrices kinetically trap α/β-polymorphs (RI=60-70%) eliminating phase-change pressures. Khan et al. (2022) reported imperfect NLCs retaining >90% EE for 12+ months at 4°C with DSC showing 20-35% reduced enthalpy (ΔH). Hydrochlorothiazide imperfect NLCs lost <5% vs perfect NLCs' 15% after 6 months. [17,18]                                                                        

  • Surface Lipid Migration Boosts Uptake                                                           

Liquid lipids migrate to imperfect NLC surfaces (~10 nm fluid shells) boosting micropinocytosis/caveolin pathways 8-14 times vs perfect NLCs' rigid faces in Caco-2 models (Jeitler et al., 2024). Enables Peyer's patch lymphatic absorption. [15,16]                                                                   

  • Biphasic Controlled Release                                                                                  

Fitriani et al. (2024) documented disordered cores yielding 20-30% initial burst (surface liquid lipids) and 60-80% sustained diffusion (Higuchi kinetics, 24-72h). Clotrimazole imperfect NLCs released 56.6% at 80h vs perfect plateauing at 42.5%. Perfect NLCs fracture releasing 85-90% burst via crystal cleavage; imperfect biphasic profile combines rapid onset with prolonged exposure. [19]

CONSEQUENCES FOR DRUG DELIVERY                                               

Imperfect nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) revolutionize drug delivery through their hole-filled, messy matrix from blending solid fats with oils, outperforming perfect NLCs' rigid crystal structure that limits medicine handling. [20]

  • Massive Drug Loading Boost                                                                                              

Chauhan et al. (2020) packed imperfect NLCs with 28% drug by weight vs only 18% in perfect NLCs. Oil holes trapped extra molecules snugly during production and locked them tight for months perfect crystals no-space squeeze expelled 15-20% drug in storage, but imperfect gaps prevented all loss, enabling high-dose therapies in tiny particles. [1]

  • Smooth Sustained Release                                                                                                      

Khan et al. (2022) studied oral imperfect NLCs releasing 80% drug evenly across 48 hours (no big spikes), vs perfect NLCs dumping 90% in first 12 hours wildly. The messy matrix acted as “slow valve” gaps let drug ooze gradually for constant blood levels treating chronic issues like diabetes, while perfect rigid walls burst uncontrolled causing side effect peaks. [21]

  • Superior Long-Term Stability                                                                                           

Chauhan et al. (2020) reported imperfect NLCs (loose RI=67% matrix) stored drugs at full potency 6 months room temperature with zero expulsion, vs perfect NLCs losing 20% drug in 3 months from crystal pressure. Imperfect holes distributed drug evenly without stress points, perfect tight packing created expulsion hotspots during crystallization shifts. [1]

  • Enhanced Oral Bioavailability                                                                                       

Elmowafy et al. (2021) measured 2.5 folds higher bloodstream drug from gut-absorbed imperfect NLCs vs perfect ones. Oil gaps shielded medicine from acid breakdown and aided M-cell grab in intestines perfect smooth barriers got digested fast, dropping absorption to <20%. [12]

  • Deeper Skin/Tumour Penetration                              

Fitriani et al. (2024) applied imperfect NLCs penetrating skin 3x deeper (dermis layer) with 72-hour release vs perfect NLCs stuck epidermis dumping quick. Bumpy oil surface + internal pockets pushed through barriers steadily for acne/anti-aging, perfect flat crystals sat surface-bound. [23]

  • Avoids First-Pass Liver Loss                                                                                              

Mall et al. (2024) showed imperfect NLCs using lymph paths bypassed liver metabolism, delivering 70% drug active vs perfect NLCs' 30% after liver breakdown. Gaps enabled lymphatic uptake highways, perfect ones took blood route getting filtered. [22,28]                                                                                             

CHARACTERIZATION OF IMPERFECT NLC 

Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), Type I (imperfect crystal model), feature a lipid matrix with multiple voids and nanoconcavities from blending solid lipids (e.g., glyceryl behenate) and liquid lipids (e.g., oleic acid), unlike perfect structured NLCs that form highly ordered, uniform crystalline lattices with few defects. [24,27]

  • Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)                                                                                            

Laser scattering instrument quantifies hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential; perfect NLCs exhibit narrow PDI (0.1) from crystalline uniformity, while imperfect NLCs show elevated PDI (0.25) due to void-induced size heterogeneity. Chauhan et al. (2020) observed PDI 0.25 at 200 nm in imperfect Type I NLCs versus PDI 0.1 in perfect NLCs, directly linking liquid lipid disruptions to broader distributions and higher drug accommodation spaces.? [1]

  • Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)                                         

Negative Staining/Freeze-Fracture: Electron beam imaging with uranyl acetate staining on copper grids or cryo-fracture reveals internal structure; perfect NLCs appear as homogeneously dense spheres, imperfect ones display prominent dark voids and irregular contours. Chauhan et al. (2020) imaged 200 nm imperfect NLCs with multiple internal voids (high-contrast dark regions) contrasting uniform solid cores in perfect NLCs, confirming disordered lattice formation from oil incorporation. [1]

  • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)                                                         

Thermal analysis heats samples (5-10°C/min) to track melting temperature (Tm) and enthalpy (ΔH); perfect NLCs retain bulk-like sharp peaks (Tm - 65°C, ΔH 120 J/g), imperfect NLCs show broadened/depressed peaks (Tm ~58°C, ΔH ~80 J/g) with recrystallization index RI = (ΔH NLC/ΔH bulk × 100) = 67%. Chauhan et al. (2020) reported these exact shifts in imperfect Type I NLCs (RI=67%), evidencing reduced crystal order from spatial mismatches in fatty acid chains, absent in perfect structured variants. [1]

  • Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)                                                           

Cantilever probe in tapping mode scans hydrated samples for 3D topography and roughness (Ra); perfect NLCs yield smooth surfaces (Ra 2-3 nm), imperfect NLCs exhibit protrusions/roughness (Ra 5-10 nm) from oily domains. Chauhan et al. (2020) measured 2 times higher Ra in imperfect NLCs due to surface imperfections, providing non-dehydrated proof of matrix heterogeneity versus flat perfect NLC topography. [1]

  • Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)                                                

Synchrotron or lab X-rays (λ=1.54 Å) probe nanoscale polymorphism via scattering patterns; perfect NLCs display sharp Bragg peaks at 20-22° (α/β forms), imperfect NLCs show peak broadening/weakening from lattice flaws. Chauhan et al. (2020) observed diminished and broadened peaks in imperfect NLCs, quantifying oil-induced polymorphic disorder not seen in highly ordered perfect NLC structures. [1]

STRATEGIC FORMULATION OF IMPERFECT NLCs: ENABLING VERSATILE SOLID, LIQUID, AND SEMISOLID DOSAGE FORMS

Imperfect nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) feature a disordered solid lipid matrix created by blending solid and liquid lipids, which enhances drug loading and stability compared to perfect crystalline structures. These NLCs start as aqueous dispersions but convert readily into solid, liquid, or semisolid dosage forms like tablets or gels. [26,29]

Solid Dosage Forms (Tablets/Capsules)                                                         

Lyophilize NLC with mannitol (2-5%)/trehalose, blend with microcrystalline cellulose (filler/binder), direct compression (6-10 kN hardness). Liquid lipid domains plasticize the imperfect matrix under compression stress, preventing crystalline fracture and drug expulsion; Kim et al. (2019) demonstrated cetyl palmitate: Miglyol 812N Praziquantel-NLC tablets retaining 77.3% entrapment efficiency post-compression with 2.5 folds pharmacokinetic AUC improvement via sustained gastrointestinal release. [18]

Semisolid Dosage Forms (Gels/Creams)

 NLC dispersions (5-20%) are believed to be effectively incorporated into carbomer gels (neutralized to pH 6-7) or oil-in-water (O/W) creams during the cooling phase with gentle stirring to retain particle sizes around 200 nm. Shah et al. (2025) reported glyceryl behenate: oleic acid (65:35) NLC gels with 3.4-fold skin flux enhancement and pseudoplastic rheology (42% viscosity reduction under shear), outperforming perfect NLC gels (flux limited to 3.7-fold due to aggregation). Patel et al. (2012) formulated aceclofenac-NLC gel (oleic acid 30% w/w) exhibiting smooth texture, a 2.65 enhancement ratio in permeation versus hydrogel alone, and no skin irritation. Recent Amphotericin B-NLC gels demonstrated 93.4% entrapment, 48% release in 8 h (Higuchi kinetics), and superior ex vivo permeation. [14]

Liquid Dosage Forms (Suspensions)

Direct use of NLC dispersions, augmented with xanthan gum (0.2-0.5% w/w) believed to improve viscosity and preservatives for stability, has been explored; notably, curcumin-NLC suspensions (2025) demonstrated a 12.6-fold C max increase and zero-order kinetics over 30 days. [25]

Liquid Dosage Forms (Drops)

In ocular drug delivery systems, high-shear homogenization of 1-5% Type I NLC dispersions (pH 5.5-7.4, 300 mOsm/kg) with Cremophor EL/Tween 80 surfactants and glycerin is believed to enhance mucoadhesion and reduce nasolacrimal drainage, as evidenced in applications for glaucoma and hydrophobic therapeutics. [30]

 

Table: 1 Dosage Form Formulations

 

Dosage Form

 

Formulation Procedure

 

Observed Effects

 

Reference

Semisolid (Gels/Creams)

Disperse 5-20% w/w NLC into carbomer gels (pH 6-7 post-neutralization) or oil-in-water creams during cooling phase via gentle stirring; maintains particle size ~200 nm.

3.4-fold skin flux enhancement; pseudoplastic flow (viscosity reduced 42% under shear); 92% drug release at 24h (Q24h); zeta potential -28.8 mV for stability. Superior to perfect NLC gels (flux limited to 3.7 μg/cm²/h due to aggregation).

Shah et al. (2025): Glyceryl behenate: oleic acid (65:35) NLC gels. Patel et al. (2012): Cream formulations.

Solid (Tablets)

Lyophilize NLC with 2-5% w/w mannitol/trehalose cryoprotectant; blend 1:1 with microcrystalline cellulose; direct compression at 6-10 kN.

Encapsulation efficiency (EE) retained at 77.3%; 2.5-fold area under curve (AUC) increase. Superior to perfect NLC tablets (EE 52%; 48% drug expulsion from crystalline fracture).

Kim et al. (2019):                 Cetyl palmitate: Miglyol® 812 (60:40) praziquantel-NLC tablets.

Liquid (Suspensions)

Direct incorporation of NLC dispersion with 0.2-0.5% w/w xanthan gum for viscosity adjustment and preservatives.

12.6-fold maximum concentration (Cmax); zero-order release kinetics over 30 days; prevents 35% drug leakage observed in perfect NLCs.

Curcumin-NLC suspensions (2025 study).

Liquid (Drops)

1-5% w/w Type I NLC dispersion (pH 5.5-7.4, 300 mOsm/kg osmolality) with Cremophor EL/Tween 80 surfactants and glycerin tonicity agent; high-shear homogenization.

Mucoadhesive properties minimize nasolacrimal drainage; sustained precorneal retention for glaucoma/hydrophobic drug delivery; 2-4× corneal permeation enhancement.

Luo et al. (2022): Sorafenib-NLC (monolaurin: Capryol-90 2:1); Yu et al. (2017): Nepafenac.

 

CONCLUSION

Imperfect nanostructured lipid carriers represent a significant advancement over conventional solid lipid nanoparticles by offering enhanced drug loading, improved stability, and controlled drug release profiles. The deliberate incorporation of liquid lipids into solid lipid matrices creates structural imperfections that prevent drug expulsion during storage and enable sustained, biphasic release behavior. Comprehensive characterization techniques confirm the disordered crystalline nature of imperfect NLCs and their impact on performance. Their adaptability into solid, semisolid, and liquid dosage forms further highlights their versatility across oral, topical, and transdermal drug delivery routes. Overall, imperfect NLCs provide a robust and promising platform for improving the bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of poorly soluble drugs.

REFERENCES

  1. Chauhan I, Yasir M, Verma M, Singh AP. Nanostructured lipid carriers: A groundbreaking approach for transdermal drug delivery. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):150.
  2. Shrotriya S, Ranpise N, Satpute P, Vidhate B. Skin targeting of curcumin solid lipid nanoparticles-engrossed topical gel for the treatment of pigmentation and irritant contact dermatitis. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology. 2018 Oct 3;46(7):1471-82.
  3. Poonia N, Kharb R, Lather V, Pandita D. Nanostructured lipid carriers: versatile oral delivery vehicle. Future science OA. 2016 Sep 1;2(3): FSO135.
  4. Jain P, Rahi P, Pandey V, Asati S, Soni V. Nanostructure lipid carriers: a modish contrivance to overcome the ultraviolet effects. Egyptian journal of basic and applied sciences. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):89-100.
  5. Jaiswal P, Gidwani B, Vyas A. Nanostructured lipid carriers and their current application in targeted drug delivery. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology. 2016 Jan 2;44(1):27-40.
  6. Naseri N, Valizadeh H, Zakeri-Milani P. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: structure, preparation and application. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 2015 Sep 19;5(3):305.
  7. Mukherjee S, Ray S, Thakur RS. Solid lipid nanoparticles: a modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2009 Jul;71(4):349.
  8. López-García R, Ganem-Rondero A. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): occlusive effect and penetration enhancement ability. Journal of cosmetics, dermatological sciences and applications. 2015 Mar 20;5(02):62.
  9. Garcês A, Amaral MH, Lobo JS, Silva AC. Formulations based on solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for cutaneous use: A review. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018 Jan 15; 112:159-67.
  10. Keck CM, Baisaeng N, Durand P, Prost M, Meinke MC, Müller RH. Oil-enriched, ultra-small nanostructured lipid carriers (usNLC): A novel delivery system based on flip–flop structure. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2014 Dec 30;477(1-2):227-35.
  11. Das S, Ng WK, Tan RB. Are nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) better than solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs): development, characterizations and comparative evaluations of clotrimazole-loaded SLNs and NLCs? European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2012 Aug 30;47(1):139-51.
  12. Elmowafy M, Ibrahim HM, Ahmed MA, Shalaby K, Salama A, Hefesha H. Atorvastatin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs): strategy to overcome oral delivery drawbacks. Drug delivery. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):932-41.
  13. Salvi VR, Pawar P. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) system: A novel drug targeting carrier. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019 Jun 1; 51:255-67.
  14. Patel RB, Patel UR, Rogge MC, Selen A, Welling PG, Shah VP, Prasad VK. Bioavailability of hydrochlorothiazide from tablets and suspensions. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1984 Mar;73(3):359-61.
  15. Haider M, Abdin SM, Kamal L, Orive G. Nanostructured lipid carriers for delivery of chemotherapeutics: A review. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Mar;12(3):288.
  16. Joshi M, Patravale V. Nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) based gel of celecoxib. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008 Jan 4;346(1-2):124-32.
  17. Kesharwani R, Jaiswal P, Patel DK, Yadav PK. Lipid-based drug delivery system (LBDDS): An emerging paradigm to enhance oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Biomedical Materials & Devices. 2023 Sep;1(2):648-63.
  18. Khan S, Shaharyar M, Fazil M, Hassan MQ, Baboota S, Ali J. Tacrolimus-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for oral delivery-in vivo bioavailability enhancement. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2016 Dec 1; 109:149-57.
  19. Kim KT, Kim MH, Park JH, Lee JY, Cho HJ, Yoon IS, Kim DD. Microemulsion-based hydrogels for enhancing epidermal/dermal deposition of topically administered 20 (S)-protopanaxadiol: in vitro and in vivo evaluation studies. Journal of ginseng research. 2018 Oct 1;42(4):512-23.
  20. Shah RM, Malherbe F, Eldridge D, Palombo EA, Harding IH. Physicochemical characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) prepared by a novel microemulsion technique. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2014 Aug 15; 428:286-94.
  21. Khan I, Sunita S, Hussein NR, Omer HK, Elhissi A, Houacine C, Khan W, Yousaf S, Rathore HA. Development and characterization of novel combinations and compositions of nanostructured lipid carrier formulations loaded with trans-resveratrol for pulmonary drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2024 Dec 12;16(12):1589.
  22. Müller RH, Radtke M, Wissing SA. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2002 Nov 1;54: S131-55.
  23. Abdelbary G, Haider M. In vitro characterization and growth inhibition effect of nanostructured lipid carriers for controlled delivery of methotrexate. Pharmaceutical development and technology. 2013 Oct 1;18(5):1159-68.
  24. Tang CH, Chen HL, Dong JR. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as food-grade nanovehicles for hydrophobic nutraceuticals or bioactives. Applied Sciences. 2023 Jan 29;13(3):1726.
  25. Abdelhameed AH, Abdelhafez WA, Mohamed MS. Formulation, optimization, and in-vivo evaluation of nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with Fexofenadine HCL for oral delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2022 Aug 1; 74:103607.
  26. Ghasemiyeh P, Mohammadi-Samani S. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as novel drug delivery systems: applications, advantages and disadvantages. Research in pharmaceutical sciences. 2018 Aug 1;13(4):288-303.
  27. Tang CH, Chen HL, Dong JR. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as food-grade nanovehicles for hydrophobic nutraceuticals or bioactives. Applied Sciences. 2023 Jan 29;13(3):1726.
  28. Fathi F, Machado TO, de AC Kodel H, Portugal I, Ferreira IO, Zielinska A, Oliveira MB, Souto EB. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for the delivery of bioactives sourced from plants: part II–applications and preclinical advancements. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2024 Oct 2;21(10):1491-9.
  29. Behbahani ES, Ghaedi M, Abbaspour M, Rostamizadeh K. Optimization and characterization of ultrasound assisted preparation of curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: Application of central composite design, thermal analysis and X-ray diffraction techniques. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2017 Sep 1; 38:271-80.
  30. Luo Q, Yang J, Xu H, Shi J, Liang Z, Zhang R, Lu P, Pu G, Zhao N, Zhang J. Sorafenib-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for topical ocular therapy of corneal neovascularization: development, in-vitro and in vivo study. Drug Delivery. 2022 Dec 31;29(1):837-55.

Reference

  1. Chauhan I, Yasir M, Verma M, Singh AP. Nanostructured lipid carriers: A groundbreaking approach for transdermal drug delivery. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):150.
  2. Shrotriya S, Ranpise N, Satpute P, Vidhate B. Skin targeting of curcumin solid lipid nanoparticles-engrossed topical gel for the treatment of pigmentation and irritant contact dermatitis. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology. 2018 Oct 3;46(7):1471-82.
  3. Poonia N, Kharb R, Lather V, Pandita D. Nanostructured lipid carriers: versatile oral delivery vehicle. Future science OA. 2016 Sep 1;2(3): FSO135.
  4. Jain P, Rahi P, Pandey V, Asati S, Soni V. Nanostructure lipid carriers: a modish contrivance to overcome the ultraviolet effects. Egyptian journal of basic and applied sciences. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):89-100.
  5. Jaiswal P, Gidwani B, Vyas A. Nanostructured lipid carriers and their current application in targeted drug delivery. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology. 2016 Jan 2;44(1):27-40.
  6. Naseri N, Valizadeh H, Zakeri-Milani P. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: structure, preparation and application. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 2015 Sep 19;5(3):305.
  7. Mukherjee S, Ray S, Thakur RS. Solid lipid nanoparticles: a modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2009 Jul;71(4):349.
  8. López-García R, Ganem-Rondero A. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): occlusive effect and penetration enhancement ability. Journal of cosmetics, dermatological sciences and applications. 2015 Mar 20;5(02):62.
  9. Garcês A, Amaral MH, Lobo JS, Silva AC. Formulations based on solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for cutaneous use: A review. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018 Jan 15; 112:159-67.
  10. Keck CM, Baisaeng N, Durand P, Prost M, Meinke MC, Müller RH. Oil-enriched, ultra-small nanostructured lipid carriers (usNLC): A novel delivery system based on flip–flop structure. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2014 Dec 30;477(1-2):227-35.
  11. Das S, Ng WK, Tan RB. Are nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) better than solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs): development, characterizations and comparative evaluations of clotrimazole-loaded SLNs and NLCs? European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2012 Aug 30;47(1):139-51.
  12. Elmowafy M, Ibrahim HM, Ahmed MA, Shalaby K, Salama A, Hefesha H. Atorvastatin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs): strategy to overcome oral delivery drawbacks. Drug delivery. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):932-41.
  13. Salvi VR, Pawar P. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) system: A novel drug targeting carrier. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019 Jun 1; 51:255-67.
  14. Patel RB, Patel UR, Rogge MC, Selen A, Welling PG, Shah VP, Prasad VK. Bioavailability of hydrochlorothiazide from tablets and suspensions. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1984 Mar;73(3):359-61.
  15. Haider M, Abdin SM, Kamal L, Orive G. Nanostructured lipid carriers for delivery of chemotherapeutics: A review. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Mar;12(3):288.
  16. Joshi M, Patravale V. Nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) based gel of celecoxib. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008 Jan 4;346(1-2):124-32.
  17. Kesharwani R, Jaiswal P, Patel DK, Yadav PK. Lipid-based drug delivery system (LBDDS): An emerging paradigm to enhance oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Biomedical Materials & Devices. 2023 Sep;1(2):648-63.
  18. Khan S, Shaharyar M, Fazil M, Hassan MQ, Baboota S, Ali J. Tacrolimus-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for oral delivery-in vivo bioavailability enhancement. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2016 Dec 1; 109:149-57.
  19. Kim KT, Kim MH, Park JH, Lee JY, Cho HJ, Yoon IS, Kim DD. Microemulsion-based hydrogels for enhancing epidermal/dermal deposition of topically administered 20 (S)-protopanaxadiol: in vitro and in vivo evaluation studies. Journal of ginseng research. 2018 Oct 1;42(4):512-23.
  20. Shah RM, Malherbe F, Eldridge D, Palombo EA, Harding IH. Physicochemical characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) prepared by a novel microemulsion technique. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2014 Aug 15; 428:286-94.
  21. Khan I, Sunita S, Hussein NR, Omer HK, Elhissi A, Houacine C, Khan W, Yousaf S, Rathore HA. Development and characterization of novel combinations and compositions of nanostructured lipid carrier formulations loaded with trans-resveratrol for pulmonary drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2024 Dec 12;16(12):1589.
  22. Müller RH, Radtke M, Wissing SA. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2002 Nov 1;54: S131-55.
  23. Abdelbary G, Haider M. In vitro characterization and growth inhibition effect of nanostructured lipid carriers for controlled delivery of methotrexate. Pharmaceutical development and technology. 2013 Oct 1;18(5):1159-68.
  24. Tang CH, Chen HL, Dong JR. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as food-grade nanovehicles for hydrophobic nutraceuticals or bioactives. Applied Sciences. 2023 Jan 29;13(3):1726.
  25. Abdelhameed AH, Abdelhafez WA, Mohamed MS. Formulation, optimization, and in-vivo evaluation of nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with Fexofenadine HCL for oral delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2022 Aug 1; 74:103607.
  26. Ghasemiyeh P, Mohammadi-Samani S. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as novel drug delivery systems: applications, advantages and disadvantages. Research in pharmaceutical sciences. 2018 Aug 1;13(4):288-303.
  27. Tang CH, Chen HL, Dong JR. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as food-grade nanovehicles for hydrophobic nutraceuticals or bioactives. Applied Sciences. 2023 Jan 29;13(3):1726.
  28. Fathi F, Machado TO, de AC Kodel H, Portugal I, Ferreira IO, Zielinska A, Oliveira MB, Souto EB. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for the delivery of bioactives sourced from plants: part II–applications and preclinical advancements. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2024 Oct 2;21(10):1491-9.
  29. Behbahani ES, Ghaedi M, Abbaspour M, Rostamizadeh K. Optimization and characterization of ultrasound assisted preparation of curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: Application of central composite design, thermal analysis and X-ray diffraction techniques. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2017 Sep 1; 38:271-80.
  30. Luo Q, Yang J, Xu H, Shi J, Liang Z, Zhang R, Lu P, Pu G, Zhao N, Zhang J. Sorafenib-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for topical ocular therapy of corneal neovascularization: development, in-vitro and in vivo study. Drug Delivery. 2022 Dec 31;29(1):837-55.

Photo
N. Chandana
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India- 570004

Photo
Venkatesh
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Photo
Raghu Kumar H.M.
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Photo
Parthasarathi K. Kulkarni
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Photo
Hanumanthachar Joshi
Co-author

Department of Pharmacognosy, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

N. Chandana, Venkatesh., Raghu Kumar H. M., Parthasarathi Kulkarni, Hanumanthachar Joshi, Nanostructured Lipid Carriers: Engineering Imperfect Lipid Matrices for Enhanced Drug Delivery, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 688-696 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19414904

More related articles
Comprehensive Insights into Screening Models for t...
Shagufta A Farooqui, Dr. S. S. Patil, ...
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Dru...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
Innovative Approaches to The Diagnosis and Managem...
Kartik Khairnar, Khushi Patodkar, Harshal Patodkar, Khan Heba, Sh...
Nanoparticles: A Novel Drug Delivery System...
Dipali N. Hagir, Pranjal Amol Girme , Prachi chandrakant phadtare , ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Transdermal Patch for Gout Therapy...
Sakshi Kachare , Monali Parbhane , Rutuja Jadhav, Ritesh Mali, Madhuja Walunj, Akanksha Rohokale, Sh...
Evaluation of Asparagus racemosus Root Extract and Eucalyptus Oil Formulations a...
Dr. Namburu Sree Lakshmi, Pratap Veeresh Babu, T Venkata Shiva Sai Karthik, Nalluri Kavya Sri, Jagan...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Patch Containing Cyclizine HCl...
Priyanka N , Venkatesh , Salman M, Hanumanthachar Joshi, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Skin Infection Care Cream...
Shashank Tiwari, Sushil Kumar Pal, Vaibhav Raj Pandey, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Film of Chlorpromazine...
Rajat Pawar, Swati Singh, Sunita Patidar, P. K. Dubey, ...
Phytopharmaceutical Formulations: Advances in Herbal Drug Delivery and Therapeut...
Shital Shinde, Chaitali Sonawane, Vaishnavi Sutar, Dr. Nitin Waghmode, ...
More related articles
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Drug Testing: Bridging Biology an...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
Innovative Approaches to The Diagnosis and Management of Multidrug-Resistant and...
Kartik Khairnar, Khushi Patodkar, Harshal Patodkar, Khan Heba, Shraddha Kamankar, ...
Artificial Organs and Organoids in Preclinical Drug Testing: Bridging Biology an...
Darade Krushna, Garje Manoj, Garje Aarti, Darade Shraddha, ...
Innovative Approaches to The Diagnosis and Management of Multidrug-Resistant and...
Kartik Khairnar, Khushi Patodkar, Harshal Patodkar, Khan Heba, Shraddha Kamankar, ...