View Article

Abstract

Affordable medicines, commonly known as generic drugs, play a crucial role in improving access to healthcare, particularly in developing countries like India, where high drug prices remain a major barrier to effective treatment. This study focuses on the marketing development of affordable medicines, emphasising the importance of generic pharmaceuticals in reducing healthcare expenditure without compromising quality, safety, or efficacy. The work highlights affordability as a key determinant of healthcare access and discusses the role of price regulation, competition, and government policies in ensuring equitable medicine availability. Azithromycin, a widely used macrolide antibiotic, was selected as a representative product due to its broad therapeutic applications, established safety profile, and cost-effectiveness. The study outlines the complete new product development (NPD) process, including idea generation, screening, concept development, business and marketing strategy, product development, test marketing, and commercialisation. In addition, the product life cycle of generic medicines is discussed, demonstrating how patent expiry and market competition contribute to significant price reductions over time. Marketing mix elements such as product positioning, pricing strategies, promotion, distribution, packaging, and branding are analysed to illustrate how affordable medicines can achieve market penetration and sustainability. The findings suggest that well-planned marketing strategies, combined with efficient regulatory frameworks and competitive pricing, can enhance the uptake of generic medicines, reduce out-of-pocket healthcare expenses, and support universal health coverage. Overall, affordable medicines are essential for strengthening healthcare systems and addressing the growing disease burden in resource-limited settings.

Keywords

Affordable medicine, Generic drugs, Pharmaceutical marketing, Azithromycin, Product life cycle

Introduction

Affordable Medicine

Affordability refers to the extent to which a medicine is acquired when it is necessary, at a price that does not subject the user to the risk of severe adverse effects, including failure to meet other essential human needs. Generic drugs are a critical component of the pharmaceutical ecosystem.(1) The cheap and off-patent medicines maintain the health care costs overall at a low cost. And they put the sort of pressure that keeps the large drug companies at work in the laboratory, preferably coming up with new batches of breakthrough drugs that will come to market at the time that current big money-makers will go out of patent.(2)

What is the reason why generic medicine is necessary?

High drug prices are a major deterrent to effective healthcare in India since the population does not have purchasing power. The following facts are first-hand causes of the disease burden prevalence in India, and generic medicines have a key role to play in this case.(3)

Figure 1: Affordable Medicine photo example

Rationale behind the choice of the product.

Healthcare expenditure is influenced by the development and distribution of the pharmaceutical industry. The issue of healthcare costs is of significant international interest, and so is the high cost of drugs.

The problem of drug regulation in India, in the light of healthcare for the poor and affordability, is something that is continuously under scrutiny in emerging countries such as ours.

The cost of medication influences the healthcare spending, and a significant portion of healthcare spending. The Indian Council of Medical Research and health expenditure have been largely financed by the out-of-pocket expenditure of households, particularly in countries such as India, which is one of the greatest causes of a high number of households lapsing into poverty.

The following are the reasons why I chose Azithromycin.

There are numerous other uses of Azithromycin.

The application of Azithromycin is large-scale in the treatment of some bacterial infections, including Bronchitis, pneumonia, sexually transmitted and ear, lung, sinus, skin, throat and reproductive organ infections. And mild cases of lung, sinus, skin and other body parts.(4)

 Azithromycin in the form of a tablet, an extended-release (long-acting) suspension (liquid) and in a suspension (liquid) to be administered orally, and in the form of a capsule.

The use of Azithromycin in gynaecology is common. It is also the drug of the first line of treatment of the infection caused by Haemophilus ducreyi, Mycoplasma, Neisseria gonorrhoeae chlamydia trachoma serovars D.K, genital. (5) Azithromycin was originally approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1991.

It is believed that Azithromycin is less cardiac adverse in comparison with other Macrolides.

Azithromycin has an elimination half-life of 2-4 days.

Classification:

Azithromycin belongs to Macrolide Antibiotics. Azithromycin attaches to the 50S bacterial ribosomal unit. It suppresses protein synthesis in bacteria by blocking the flow of the aminoacyl-tRNA and the protein undergoing synthesis through the ribosome, neutrophil infestations, and macrophage polarisation. (6)

  1.  
  2. assists our company in creating a sense of loyalty amongst consumers in the market. The brand is developed with the intent of generating awareness of the possible benefits of our product. It is established to make the product stand out from the rest of the competitors.(7)

Figure 2: Logo and Tagline of our company

We would also like to pass on the message that we are innovating the market. The perception of the customer about our company or our product is branding. (8)

Branding establishes a personalised position of the product in the market. ARORA has developed a brand name in the product.(9)

Figure 3: Branding of the new Affordable Medicine

METHODOLOGY:

New Product Development

Productivity is important when it comes to effective new product development. A new product development strategy (NPD strategy) is essential to pick up great product ideas and transform them into even greater final physical products.(10)

Strategies of NPD ought to be systematic, customer and sales-objective-oriented. The new product development is done together by the product management team. By adhering to the eight stages of the NPD process, eventual productivity and subsequent launch of the product in the market will be viable.(11)

1) Idea Generation:

This phase is an ongoing, careful search for new and viable product development possibilities. The team uses simple internal and external SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) and looks at the market trends in order to come up with hundreds, or even thousands, of potential product ideas.(12)

Internal sources can be obtained with the help of R&D and brainstorming of the staff, whereas external sources are usually obtained by researching and communicating with the distributors, suppliers, customers and competitors. (13)

In this case, the decision is made that ARORA will be dealing with an antihypertensive drug.

  • Interrogate to gauge the viability of an idea of antihypertensive medicine.
  • Determine the market development in the clinical industry.
  • Familiarise oneself with known compositions of already existing anticancer drug.
  • Examine all physical characteristics of the drug concept. (14)
    1. Idea Screening:

The second step is to filter all new ideas generated, which will allow them to separate the good ones and the not-so-good ones and eliminate the latter, considering a variety of factors:

    • Customer needs
    • Current market trends
    • Affordability Drug Composition (Azithromycin is selected as the active ingredient)
    • Drug Efficacy (15)
    1. Concept Development & Testing Concept development:
    1. that survives the screening process is then transformed into an idea, which will be subjected to testing its feasibility in real life. (16)
    1. product concept (the Affordable formulation) is a comprehensive form of your product development idea, created in significant, relatable terms to a consumer so that it can best be presented. (17)
    2. each viable idea of developing a new product, several alternatives can be developed, of which we can choose the best that has high chances of attracting our target audience. These options could differ depending on a number of criteria, including quality, cost, features and ease of use and comfort. (18)
    3. testing:
    •  After the development of concepts, pre-clinical studies can be initiated. The results received are then applied to further enhance the concept to suit our customers' needs and requirements.(19)
    1. process thus allows our business to test in a quick and cost-effective manner the initial attitudes towards our new product before huge amounts of time, money and manpower are invested in the real prototype development. (20)
    1. Business & Marketing Strategy Development:
    1. the good idea has been picked, it is time to compile a rough business and marketing plan.
    1. necessitates a thorough research on the processes that will eventually be applied by the product management, marketing and sales teams in producing and selling the product to our target audience. (21)
    2. that are required, like product profitability and marketing mix, will be established. The strategies to identify are as follows:
    • Target market.
    • New product's planned value proposition
    • Sales, market share and profit goals for the first few years following the new product’s launch
    • Planned development, marketing, sales and distribution budgets
    • Planned long-term product goals.(22)
    1. Business & Financial Analysis:
    1. should make sure that we are in a position to finance the business and marketing strategy that was outlined above.(23)

To do this, it is necessary to take into consideration a comprehensive list of factors, including the following:

  • Cost projections,
  • Demand projections.
  • Relevant competitors,
  • The amount of investment required,
  • Return on Investments
  • Profitability
    1. team also looks into the history of sales of similar products and surveys the actual market to identify the current trends and facts, and evaluates the scope of risk that our new product will undergo during development. (24)
    1. Product Development:
    1. the drug goes through the pre-clinical trials, it can go through clinical trials. It is a guarantee that the Affordable Preparation that is being developed can actually work as safely and effectively on the market. (25)
    1. 4: Representation of a Clinical Trial of a Drug
    1. the approval of the clinical trials, the major measures in this stage will be made later on:
    • Product construction
    • Usage testing
    • Packaging
    • Branding
    • Product positioning
    1. drug is only eligible for test marketing in case it passes the product testing.(26)
    1. Test marketing:
    1. is a process of putting our reality medicine, amlodipine, on sale in one or more sample market conditions (more details in promotion mix) and seeing the level of success (or failure) in selling our product according to our pre-established marketing strategy. (27)
    2. is once again where customer feedback is vital; this time, based upon real customer health recovery, which is seen as opposed to making inquiries about the interest in a suggested concept.
    3. may be done as an additional recommended modification to the new drug, as it is necessary. (28)
    1. idea behind this is to test the whole idea of our product before the entire investment is done and ready to be launched commercially very soon. The real quantity of test marketing required can be rather different in regards to every new product.(29)

8) Commercialisation:

    1. the drug is ready, a decision is necessary to be made to introduce the drug into the market.
    1. is intended that the new product be introduced in the market in a splashy manner, coupled with the backing marketing programme. At this phase, the strategies of full-scale production and marketing should be suitably formulated and well-polished. (30)
    1. manufacturing facility size would be one of the crucial factors in case increased demands need to be fulfilled. Indicatively, in order to launch nationwide, it has to have gigantic resources to perform advertising and promotion in our company. (31)
    2. Life Cycle
    3. life cycle of a medicine keeps costs affordable:
    4. life cycle of a medicine consists of three phases that are usually important. Research and development is the first one where the industry invests hundreds of billions of pounds in developing and testing new medicines. Once a medicine is licensed, a company has a certain time during which it has the exclusive right to sell that medicine to the NHS at a price which has been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (32)
    5. medicines life-cycle:
    6. last phase is when a drug is de-patented and can be imitated. At this stage, there will be additional competition in the market, and the price will most likely fall drastically.
    7. is the reason why breakthrough medicines such as statins can be bought now at a lower price than a cup of coffee, or some cancer drugs cost only a few pounds per day.  (33)
    1. of a medicine will consider research and development of a particular medicine; it is necessary to make profits and generate additional finance that could be reinvested into new medications and vaccines.
    1. overview of the product life cycle:
    2. production of new drugs is a very expensive undertaking that is fraught with several challenges. As a result of this, the product life cycle should be effectively managed to produce products that are sustainable and able to offset the huge cost of developing the products through commercialisation. Throughout the life of a medicine, three general life cycles exist, namely research and development (R&D), branded medicines, and generic medicines. (34)
    3. of Product Life Cycles:
    4. Development:
    5. are piling up at this stage without any matching revenue. There are products that take years and lots of capital to make and later test their effectiveness. Extrinsic sources of financing are scarce since the risk is high. (35)
    6. Introduction:
    7. stage normally involves a heavy investment in advertising and a promotional campaign aimed at creating awareness among consumers about the product and its advantages.
    1. are low as the product awareness is low at this stage. This stage is quite expensive in terms of marketing, as one has to communicate with prospective customers. (36)
    1. price of the products can be high to cover the cost of the development phase of the product life cycle, and the financing of this stage is usually by investors or leaders.
    2. unit cost is extremely high, and since the sales are low, there are no profits. There is the use of advertising and sales promotion tools. This is also developed in Promotion Mix. At this point, protection of intellectual property rights is also achieved. (37)

Figure 5: Different stages of the Product life cycle of Azithromycin

    1. Growth:
    1. case Azzcein succeeds, it proceeds to the growth phase. This is typified by increased demand, more production, and a hike in its supply. The customers have accepted the product, and companies are making efforts to expand their market share. Both the demand for the product and profits are rising, and marketing is directed towards a wide audience. The marketing strategies are different, and the attention is drawn towards maximisation of market share. At this point, the sales start picking up. But competition also begins to grow. (38)
    1. Maturity:
    1. is the most lucrative phase, and the production and marketing costs are reduced. The product sales are at their highest point. Due to the increased sales, the unit cost will fall.
    1. product continues to gain popularity, and in the long run, this renders the product profitable to the other producers. This is because there is also the increased competition of new firms at this level. There is a wide use of sales promotion methods. (39)
    2. Decline:
    3. product also assumes a higher competition since other businesses can copy its success and go ahead to improve or even offer lower prices. It is not able to support the maturity stage. The sales are reduced significantly, resulting in minimal profit. The product will lose its market share and will start to fall. (40)
    1. Brands
    1. generic pharmaceutical entry can bring more competition in the market of drugs by providing more options and reducing the drug prices as a benefit to the health customers. Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry should continue to be innovative, particularly with the innovators being provided with rights to their originator drug as intellectual property. (41)
    1. of competition concerns also arise when the originator companies apply their intellectual property rights to slow down or prevent generic entry. There are new, potentially anticompetitive strategies being employed by some pharmaceutical companies.
    1. presence of generic drugs increases competition and thus leads to a reduction in cost to the advantage of consumers and the government. Various instruments can hence encourage generic competition by the government, including reimbursement processes, substitution requirements based on ingredients or mandatory licensing. (42)
    1. Generic Drugs Market: The Indian Generic Drugs Market is USD 24.53 billion in 2022; this sector has a consistent CAGR of 6.97 per cent within the forecasting timeframe.
    2. developing nations such as India, the government agencies and other regulatory authorities have been urging manufacturers to introduce effective generic drugs to facilitate the growth of the market. The emergence of 3-D printing technology assists in producing generic drugs that have different release dates and tastes, and would be likely to drive the market growth. The limited duration and time lag between the replacements of the new drug arouses other companies to manufacture generic drugs due to the increased competition, which consequently lowers the prices of the generic drugs. The increase in access to healthcare services and healthcare awareness among the population stimulates the development of the market. (43)
    1. following are some competitor brand companies. The major competitors in the Indian Generic Drugs Market are those that operate in the market, such as
    • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
    • Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited
    • Cipla Limited
    • Lupin Limited
    • Piramal Group
    • Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited
    • Biocon Limited
    • Dr Reddy's Laboratories Limited
    • Aurobindo Pharma Limited
    • Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited

Here is a tablet that shows details of competitors,

 

Competitor 1

Competitor 2

Trade name

Zithromax

Z max

Generic name

Azithromycin

Azithromycin extended-release suspension

Route of

administration

Oral route and ophthalmic route

Oral route

Sales and Demand Forecasting

The Azithromycin market is expected to experience a trend of 5.5% growth in the forecast period of 2023-2030.

Azithromycin in the global market by type (Oral, injection, and Ophthalmic), Application (bacterial infections, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection, and others), Demographic (children, adults), End-users, Distribution channel- industry trends and forecast to 2030. (44)

Azithromycin Market Analysis and Size

CDC estimates that approximately 2 million individuals became ill each day with COVID-19 in the first week of April 2019, which was approximately 60 times that of widespread STDs and HIV on average in 2013. This situation is likely to increase even more because there is no indication or sign as yet that this pandemic will fade away in the near future. It is expected that the Asia Pacific region will have a highly lucrative growth in the forecast period due to increasing disposable income and the improving healthcare infrastructure, particularly in developing nations like India.

Statistics indicate that this trend would catapult the Azithromycin market of USD 6976.17 million in 2022 to USD 10,706.23 million in 2030 with a CAGR of 5.5 per cent in the forecast period. The type segment of the Azithromycin market is dominated by Oral, considering the increased need for fast and superior therapeutic impacts of medications. (45)

Opportunities:

a) Growing demand from emerging markets:

The emerging markets like China, India, Brazil and Mexico are increasing the demand for Azithromycin because of the rising cases of infectious diseases, the rising incomes and the expanding health facilities. This is a massive opportunity for drug manufacturers that act on behalf of other drug manufacturers in this market segment. (46)

b) Technological advancements:

The maximum duration of the patent of Azithromycin in most of the major geographies, such as Europe and North America, is up to 2019. Nonetheless, this monopoly will not last long, and this may result in more intense competition by generic players. This will offer positive prospects for the Azithromycin market development. (47)

C) High cost of Azithromycin:

The tight government regulations of approving Azithromycin because of its severe side effects may impede the growth of the Azithromycin market. The Azithromycin market communication gives us the new recent developmental details, trade regulations, import-export analysis, production analysis, value chain optimization, market share, the influence of localized and domestic market players analysis, opportunities of market based in terms of emerging revenue pockets, changes of market regulations, strategic market growth analysis, market size, category market growths, application niches and dominance, product approvals, product launches, geographic expansions, technological innovations of the market. (48)

Global Azithromycin market scope

The Azithromycin market has classification in terms of type, application, demographic, end user and channel of distribution. The expansion between these segments will assist you in examining scrawny development segments in the industries and offer the users significant market survey and intelligence to help them make strategic choices in identifying core market applications. (49)

Global Azithromycin market Regional Analysis/ insights

The Azithromycin market report includes the countries US, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, the remaining South America, Germany, France, UK, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Russia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Australia, Poland, China, Japan, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, south Korea, Saudi Arabia, south Africa, Rest of Middle East and Africa.

India will experience tremendous growth in the forecasting period of 2023 to 2030 because of the increasing healthcare infrastructure, increasing demand for advanced medical treatment drugs, a large population pool, and increasing demand for quality healthcare in the region. (50)

Competitive Landscape and Surgical Microscopes Share Analysis

  1. Azithromycin Market competitive landscape provides details of competitors. Details include are company overview, company finances, revenue generated, market potential, investment in research and development, new market initiatives, global presence, production sites and facilities, production capabilities, company strengths and weaknesses, product launch, product width and breadth, and application dominance. The above data points are only related to the company's focus on Azithromycin. (51)
  1.  
  2. is established by an organisation so that its product has an opportunity to gain more and more profits. It is a more crucial activity of any business. The pharmaceutical firms have numerous challenges with the pricing of a drug. (52) The value that will purchase goods/services may be defined as pricing, but in other words, it is the exchange value of the product and services. Pricing is a highly challenging undertaking, but a vital business aspect. The primary element of the marketing mix is the price that generates revenues.
  3. of Pricing:
  • To earn more and more profit is the main objective of a business activity & it depends upon how perfectly the price is set for a product.
  • To increase the sales volume of the product.
  • To achieve and maintain the target market share.
  • Sometimes a company sets up a price to meet the competitor’s price level.
  • To achieve market leadership.
  • To satisfy price-sensitive customers.
  • To promote a new product.
  • A Company set up a price for survival & growth. (53)
  1. has been noted that access to safe, effective, quality-assured, and affordable essential medicines and vaccines to all people will be the key to universal health coverage and financial protection. Consequently, it has been among the objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals. (54)
  2. access to medicines more accessible can be achieved by the availability and use of fairly priced, quality-assured generic and biosimilar medicines. Good examples of generic medications that allow more people to access care include hepatitis C and HIV treatment in low and middle-income countries. Increased use of three antibiotic drugs (capecitabine, imatinib, and decitabine) in China and an antiplatelet drug (clopidogrel) in lower-income European Countries has also been associated with the availability of generic medicines. Although access to generic and biosimilar drugs has improved and their usage levels are higher, the prices can be even more competitive, and the level of use can increase. In 2013, a study of the cost of generic medicines in Europe revealed that there was a large range of prices and market share. (55)
  1. an illustration, the retail prices in Switzerland were increased by manufacturers to wholesalers to the tune of over six times compared to the United Kingdom, according to the outcome of a popular price index. Although it has been established that the prices of medicines having generic competition have reduced by as much as 66% of their original price (before the expiry of the patent), this has not been occurring with the biosimilars. Partly this is due to the complicated production process and more stringent regulatory demands of marketing authorisation of biosimilars than generic medicines, which pose an obstacle to the entry of competitors in the market. (56)
  1. or biosimilar price linked to originator product
  1. European nations require a certain percentage margin (based on the originator price) of price reductions on generic and biosimilar medications. That particular discount is negotiable, and thus it may be different for different medicines. Biosimilars are the same in Belgium, Ireland, and Spain. The other nations charge the same discount on all medicines. As an example, generic outpatient prescription medicines in Estonia are at least 15% less expensive as compared to the reference medicine.(57)  Different rates of price discounts might continue to be effective in such countries, because on whether the generic or biosimilar drug is a first, second, or third entry drug. Just like internal reference pricing, requiring fixed discounts may deter price competition among various manufacturers, which may result in higher price cuts. The next aspect that determines the effectiveness of this policy choice is the price of the original or reference product on which the price of the generic or biosimilar drug is pegged.(58)
  1. methods
  1. set up a correct price, an organisation can adopt different methods and strategies. The pricing methods are classified into four main types as follows:
  1. Cost-based pricing
  2. Demand-based pricing
  3. Competition-based pricing
  4. Other methods (59)

Calculation of the price for a product:

For scheduled formulations: The formula for the calculation of the ceiling price of a scheduled formulation is as follows.

  1. 1: First, the average price to the retailer of the scheduled formulation is calculated:

Step 2: Thereafter, the ceiling price of the scheduled formulation shall be calculated as

Where,

P (s) – Avg. price to the retailer.

M - % margin to retailer, and its value is 16. (60)

For non-scheduled formulations:

NPPA also monitor the maximum retail price (MRP) of all the drugs, including non-scheduled formulations. As per DPCO-2013, no manufacturer is allowed to increase the price of a non-scheduled formulation more than 10% of MRP per year. If the manufacturer increases the price of formulation by 10% OF MRP, it empowers NPPA to reduce it to a level of 10% of MRP for the next 12 months. (61)

Figure 6: Buyers' Affordability Threshold

Promotion

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has defined promotion as all informational and persuasive efforts by the manufacturers and distributors, the impact of which is to induce prescription, supply, purchase and/or use of medicinal drugs. (62) The pharmaceutical industry in India is thriving on the low cost of production and knowledge of high-quality research, which makes this industry a $20.83 billion industry (as of January 2020). To get the marketing mix model of the pharmaceutical industry in India, we must trace back to the 4 Ps of the industry and governance. (63)

Figure 7: Four Ps of Marketing Mix

Marketing Mix Modelling in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry

The weightage that each marketing element attains when our company, ARORA, undertakes marketing mix modelling is crucial. Our base drivers are involved in developing our brand equity in an organic manner. The marketing mix modelling, on the other hand, makes optimum use of the marketing-driven incremental drivers. (64)

Unique Selling Points (USP) of Azeecin

  • Its main constituent is Azithromycin. Since consumers are more conscious about the side effects of drugs, they tend to shift to naturopathy.
  • According to the clinical trials conducted, Azeecin has relatively fewer adverse effects compared to other existing antibiotic products in the market.
  • Its dosage form is a soft-gelatin capsule, which is likely to increase patients' compliance as it is an easy route of administration.
  • Since the main active ingredient is derived from a natural source, its cost price is low. As a result, the selling price can be set too low, targeting a broader segment in the pharmaceutical market.

Product:

The Drugs and Cosmetics Act apply to products in the pharmaceutical industry. Consequently, medicine packaging in India, especially prescription drugs, has to be in accordance with some rules. These are price control, composition declaration, the direction of use, warnings, etc.(65)

A flagship product or brand equity can be used to push Azeecin to the forefront of the pharmaceutical marketing mix. Numerous small and medium-sized companies are betting on the popularity of a certain product and may be rather commercially successful in the process. However, in the case of large successful firms, it is the product variety and availability in various drug sections that allow them to utilise the product element of their marketing mix. (66)

Place:

The Pharmaceutical industry's downstream supply chain is special because of the doctors. Besides the chain of command between manufacturers and distributors, wholesale and retail chemists, the healthcare professionals play a pivotal role towards the product making it to the end-user.

To succeed in India, it is important that Azeecin cuts a niche in the local (Karnataka) supply chains and then expands to the rest of the country. (67)

Price:

Price is a significant Unique Selling Point (USP) of the Indian pharmaceutical industry.

Most of the drugs and formulations are targeted by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority as far as price fixing is concerned. Price, which is a significant constituent of the marketing mix, is in a way influenced by the disease. There is a possibility of customers not trading off preference and price when faced with major illnesses. (68)

With our survey, we drew attention to the citizens on whether they believe that the higher the price, the better the quality, as far as drugs are concerned. These were the answers we got, and they prove that not all individuals are ready to accept the idea that the data collected by high prices of drugs is not the best.

Figure 8: Answer for whether a high price equals better quality

Successful companies, particularly those with a global market, often engage in competitive pricing to ensure an edge in the market. (69)

Promotion:

Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPP) Code of Pharmaceutical.

The practices define the different aspects of advertisements in the pharma business. This involves establishing the platforms, which we can utilise for promotion and regulation.

One promotional option in the pharma industry is the use of print promotional materials such as advertisements. These materials are in addition to the name of the brand, active ingredients, dosage, date of production, precautions, side effects, manufacturer information, and others. (70)

In relation to electronic promotional materials and audiovisuals, the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 and other relevant laws are likely to be adhered to. The internet has grossly impacted a new environment for marketing our product. Other sources of information, like the internet, are a valuable promotional medium along with the traditional information sources like medical professionals and family & friends. (71)      

The following information is based on our survey:

Table 2: Percentage of People’s preference in the source of information for a drug

Online

Company Website

56.3

Social Media Page

26.2

Medical Article

42.5

 

Source Of Information

Family and Friends

11.9

Medical Professional

67.2

Internet

17.1

                         

 

Figure 9: People’s preference for the source of information for a drug

This industry is also popular in events and meetings, which are used as a form of promotion. These may be sponsored scientific or professional meetings and symposia held in support of the healthcare professionals. (72)

Another marketing instrument that is exclusive to the pharma industry is the presents that are given to healthcare professionals. Professional Sales Representatives (PSR) or Medical Representatives (MR) perform these tasks, particularly after special training. Gifting of cash or cash equivalents and personal effects in the case of healthcare professionals is prohibited. The OPPI encourages items of medical utilities and items that increase patient care, unless of high value. (73)

On the same note, medical samples are also permitted as the source of a marketing initiative.

 

 

Figure 10: Examples of Promotional Gifts

Besides these marketing processes, there are also other marketing processes, as the successful pharmaceutical firms engage in visual marketing campaigns via sponsorships, endorsements, and other pharma brand promotions.

In addition, medical exhibitions offer a special networking facility to various pharmaceutical firms to conduct business both at a national and international scale successfully. (74)

Distribution

The chain of business or intermediaries through which goods or services are passed to the end customer is the channel of distribution. The selection of a suitable channel of distribution is a very critical decision in marketing, which determines the performance of an organisation.

The marketing intermediaries are referred to as the marketing channels or distribution channels. (75)

The finished products are shipped to the super distributor/super stockist / CFA in the company. Then, it is supplied to a stockist/wholesaler who supplies to the institutions and hospitals. The retail pharmacy gets the product from the stockist (or substockist) through whom it ultimately gets to the consumers (patients). The pharma distribution channel follows as shown on the following page. (76)

Pharma Distribution Channel

Physical Distribution Management

Physical distribution management (PDM) is a process that entails the management of the flow of goods and materials from their origin to the destination. It is an extremely complicated procedure, and one of the most significant in any business. Physical distribution is the physical movement of goods between the production and consumption places. It comprises all the operations that are needed to bring the goods physically on board. (77)

For example,

Processing, Transportation, Warehousing, and Inventory Control

Physical distribution has two broad objectives: Consumer satisfaction and profit maximisation.

The biggest asset that our company has is a satisfied consumer. ARORA has the potential to offer satisfaction to the consumers by providing the appropriate quantity of the appropriate goods in the appropriate place and at the appropriate time, at minimum cost. Timely and reliable distribution leads to consumer satisfaction. (78)

Simultaneously, by providing the product at a low price and superior service, our company will be able to draw in more consumers and earn more profits. This may be affected by enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of physical distribution activities, which may introduce economy, which will impact on profit margin, i.e. by reducing the physical distribution costs, profit position can be improved.

Storage refers to creating adequate provisions on how to store the goods in good condition until they are required by customers. Several goods are grown seasonally and are consumed all year round; they can be stored and subsequently released. (79)

There are two categories of warehouses: Distribution Warehouse and Storage Warehouse.

The warehouse storage facilities assemble the product and redistribute it within a brief duration.

 Inventory control means effective management of goods that have been deposited in warehouses. The flow of business is crucial to the maintenance of a sufficient inventory level. Inventory serves as an intermediary between the customer orders and production. They constitute the storehouse of the goods that are expected of sold. So, it should be adequately administered and regulated. (80)

Material handling involves the whole process of handling products as they leave the factory, yet before they are packed into the transport. Material handling is a sub-part of the total physical distributed system and assists in lowering the costs and offers improved service to the consumers. Good management of the material handling system results in the efficacy of the total physical distribution system, and consequently makes it cost-effective. (81)

The drugs will also be discussed in the context of packaging, as further explained.

The supply is done via various modes of transport into the warehouse, depending on where we are.

Road transport is also economical and flexible in the case of regional delivery or short distances between our warehouses and a sub-distributor. Trucks are also more preferred because large amounts of drugs can be taken at the same time. Railways are more convenient for travelling across other states. (82)

As we increase our supply of drugs to the entire world, there will be a need to use alternative transport modes, which include air or water transport. Air transport is faster than water transport, yet the latter, though taking a long period of time, is much cheaper. The appropriate mode of transport shall be selected according to the budget and duration of time. (83)

Packaging and Labelling

One of the crucial aspects of the product presentation is packaging. It is with the item until a customer fails to purchase it in a retail store.

Packaging and packing are not to be used interchangeably. The thing that covers the product and protects it is packaging, and the way products are enfolded or covered into a package is termed packaging.  (84)

Our product, Azeecin, is given an outer protective cover, which is handy during transportation to the importer with the aid of appropriate packing. In the case of primary packing, the material to be used is to be neutral in order that there is no interaction. And work with the pharmaceutical product throughout its entire existence. This is done using blister strips made of non-reacting materials such as aluminium, as depicted in Figure 11.

Figure 11: Primary Packaging

Azeecin is ready for the second packaging once the airtight primary packaging is done. Active and inactive ingredients, manufacturer’s name and address, type of medicine, and warning precautions are mentioned. The use of secondary packaging needs to be smart, as it gives the product an ARORA brand appearance. (85)

     

Figure 12, 13 & 14: Secondary Packaging

 

Figure 15: Tertiary Packaging

 

Figure 16: Front side of Medicine Box

Pharmaceutical labelling is the process of attaching labels to pharmaceutical products so as to make it easy to identify and comprehend the essential information by the end-users. Drug labels attempt to determine drug contents and specify instructions or warnings for taking, storage, and disposal. This will enable the health professionals and patients/carers to choose the right medicine and take it safely, thereby contributing to the reduction of medication errors. (86)

There is the aspect of marketing a product by labelling. It is mandatory since it assists in capturing the attention of a customer. It may be coupled with packaging and may be applied by the marketers to make the potential buyers purchase the product.

The name of our drugs and the name and quantity of each component are conspicuously displayed on the label of the drug as per Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The label includes details of the name and address of the manufacturer, packer or distributor.sssss(87)

Figure 17: Box Label

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We attempted our best to present a product that costs less than the existing drug in the market by using readily available and inexpensive materials, all the while without compromising its quality and efficacy. The DAF process might take many years to complete and cannot be rushed, as there is no room for error.

As we launch our product in the market, we may face several drawbacks, especially due to a long-established brand. We expect the lower cost of our treatment to draw more attention towards our product and brand. Our promotion strategies mentioned are set to create awareness about Azeecin and to persuade more medical professionals and institutions to prescribe it.

The company strives to remain in the target market and also develop new products subsequently. During the PLC, we note how our product works and what to do to improve its sales. New approaches to keep the product relevant and profitable are continuously being updated, even post-marketing. Furthermore, as new products are under development or developed, we have the opportunity to expand our product line.

According to the new products we may develop, appropriate distributors or our existing collaborators are selected for distribution and retail.

It is also important to retain our existing consumer base. In order to obtain more information, all surveys conducted are explicitly reviewed, and we do our best to provide the best consumer satisfaction. We have to keep in mind the reason why our product was successful in the first place, and work on similar or new approaches to promote other products, as appropriate.

The launch of our Azeecin, as well as other new products in the future, at an international sales scale, depends on how successful they are. We are confident that we will accelerate our distribution through strategic tie-ups with overseas pharmaceutical partners or international pharma distribution channels. Our focus initially is to export across Asia and for contract manufacturing in African countries before expanding globally.

CONCLUSION AND OUTCOMES

Affordability is an important issue in many health care systems. Medicines commonly consults a large part of health care consumption. Providing the affordability of medicines, health care should be an important policy goal. Current levels of unaffordability can have important detrimental health effects on the most vulnerable.

The government has several plans, options for the disposal to increase the affordability of health care and medicines. From assurance of providing generic medicine, which plays an important role in the pharmaceutical market, because it offers effective treatment at a low cost. According to the National Medicine Agency and Pan-Hellenic Association of Pharmacists, generics are bioequivalent formulations and safe for human use. Furthermore, installing pre-payment schemes (i.e. insurance) to finance health care offers the possibility for the government to provide better control of generic medicine prices and purchases. The impact of the methods chosen to measure affordability, as well as the thresholds chosen.

Within those methods is a significant focus on outcomes. It appears that the observed differences, which are also reflected in the empirical literature regarding affordability, reflect the difficulty of univocally grasping the concept of affordability and of finding suitable and general thresholds for affordability.

To help the government improve access to medicines, we therefore argue that scholars and policymakers should discuss and agree on an international benchmark for how best to address the affordability question. Since comparison itself can increase the awareness and sense of urgency for governments to act urgently on these issues, it has been discussed.

To conclude, affordability is important and increasingly quantified, also across countries, we urge for a further standardisation of the measurement of affordability.

REFERENCES

  1. Mishuk AU, Fasina I, Qian J. Impact of US federal and state generic drug policies on drug use, spending, and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2020 Jun 1;16(6):736-45.
  2. Mogolian E, Mrydral P. What’s the difference between brand-name and generic prescription drugs? Sci Am. 2004:12-3.
  3. Suggala S, Mandan R, Unadkat P. CASE 7 Medkart: Contemplating the Business Strategy. Searching Alternatives: Case Studies in Management & Entrepreneurship. 2023 Oct 30.
  4. Bakheit AH, Al-Hadiya BM, Abd-Elgalil AA. Azithromycin. Profiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology. 2014 Jan 1;39:1-40.
  5. Peters DH, Friedel HA, McTavish D. Azithromycin: a review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy. Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99.
  6. Ballow CH, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: the first azalide antibiotic. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 1992 Oct;26(10):1253-61.
  7. Hamann D, Williams Jr RL, Omar M. Branding strategy and consumer high?technology product. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2007 Apr 24;16(2):98-111.
  8. Arthur Rooney J. Branding: a trend for today and tomorrow. Journal of product & brand management. 1995 Oct 1;4(4):48-55.
  9. Arthur Rooney J. Branding: a trend for today and tomorrow. Journal of product & brand management. 1995 Oct 1;4(4):48-55.
  10. Tzokas N, Hultink EJ, Hart S. Navigating the new product development process. Industrial marketing management. 2004 Oct 1;33(7):619-26.
  11. Schilling MA, Hill CW. Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Perspectives. 1998 Aug 1;12(3):67-81.
  12. Me?ep?nar E, Vayvay Ö, Kalender ZT, Tu?çe Kalender Z. Management Of Idea-to-Product Process For Successful New Product Development In Pharmaceutical Industry. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 101.
  13. Lilien GL, Morrison PD, Searls K, Sonnack M, Hippel EV. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management science. 2002 Aug;48(8):1042-59.
  14. Sozo V, Ogliari A. Stimulating design team creativity based on emotional values: A study on idea generation in the early stages of new product development processes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2019 Mar 1;70:38-50.
  15. Hammedi W, van Riel AC, Sasovova Z. Antecedents and consequences of reflexivity in new product idea screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2011 Sep;28(5):662-79.
  16. Polon AJ. Pharmaceutical Product Development from Concept to Market. In Drug Development 2019 Jun 12 (pp. 107-124). CRC Press.
  17. Schlapp J, Schumacher G. Delegated concept testing in new product development. Operations Research. 2022 Sep;70(5):2732-48.
  18. Jagpal S, Jedidi K, Jamil M. A Multibrand Concept?Testing Methodology for New Product Strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2007 Jan;24(1):34-51.
  19. Thomke S, Bell DE. Sequential testing in product development. Management Science. 2001 Feb;47(2):308-23.
  20. Thomke S, Bell DE. Sequential testing in product development. Management Science. 2001 Feb;47(2):308-23.
  21. Zemlickiene V, Maditinos D. Marketing strategy formulation for innovative product development process. Business: Theory and Practice. 2012 Dec 31;13:365.
  22. Freng Svendsen M, Haugland SA, Grønhaug K, Hammervoll T. Marketing strategy and customer involvement in product development. European Journal of Marketing. 2011 Apr 5;45(4):513-30.
  23. Sharma A, Lacey N. Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: The case of the US pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004 Sep;21(5):297-308.
  24. Storey C, Easingwood C. The impact of the new product development project on the success of financial services. Service Industries Journal. 1993 Jul 1;13(3):40-54.
  25. Buonansegna E, Salomo S, Maier AM, Li?Ying J. Pharmaceutical new product development: why do clinical trials fail?. R&D Management. 2014 Mar;44(2):189-202.
  26. Prašnikar J, Škerlj T. New product development process and time-to-market in the generic pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Marketing Management. 2006 Aug 1;35(6):690-702.
  27. Becker MC, Lillemark M. Marketing/R&D integration in the pharmaceutical industry. Research policy. 2006 Feb 1;35(1):105-20.
  28. Polon AJ. Pharmaceutical Product Development from Concept to Market. In Drug Development 2019 Jun 12 (pp. 107-124). CRC Press.
  29. Sharma A, Lacey N. Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: The case of the US pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004 Sep;21(5):297-308.
  30. Shah M. Commercialisation strategy for the pharmaceutical industry. Delft University of Technology. 2019 Oct 30.
  31. Ahmed RR, Vveinhardt J. Product development & commercialisation in the pharmaceutical industry. The Pharma Innovation. 2014 Nov 1;3(9, Part A):40.
  32. Prajapati V, Dureja H. Product lifecycle management in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Medical Marketing. 2012 Aug;12(3):150-8.
  33. Bungau S, Bungau C, Tit DM. Studies on the last stage of product lifecycle management for a pharmaceutical product. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):56-62.
  34. Ponnusamy SK, Ragini YP. Product Lifecycle in the Pharmaceutical Industry. In Global Supply Chains in the Pharmaceutical Industry 2019 (pp. 112-132). IGI Global.
  35. Prajapati V, Dureja H. Product lifecycle management in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Medical Marketing. 2012 Aug;12(3):150-8.
  36. Bungau S, Bungau C, Tit DM. Studies on the last stage of product lifecycle management for a pharmaceutical product. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):56-62.
  37. Nagar A, Jena D. PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT.
  38. Naneva N. Marketing Strategies During the Product Life Cycle in the Pharmaceutical Industry (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  39. Tripathy S, Prajapati V, Sengodan Guruswamy V. Product Life Cycle Management for Pharmaceutical Innovation. Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs. 2015 Dec 1;2(3):145-52.
  40. Hein T, Winkler M, Gulati H, Balakrishnan A. Product lifecycle management for the pharmaceutical industry. Oracle Life Sciences. 2012:1-2.
  41. Schmidt RÄ, Pioch EA. Community pharmacies under pressure–can branding help?. International journal of retail & distribution management. 2005 Jul 1;33(7):494-504.
  42. Bednarik, J. Does brand differentiate pharmaceuticals? Neuroendocrinology Letters. 2005 Dec 1;26(6):635-52.
  43. Wilkie DC, Johnson LW, White L. Strategies used to defend pharmaceutical brands from generics. European Journal of Marketing. 2012 Sep 14;46(9):1195-214.
  44. Anusha SL, Alok S, Shaik A. Demand forecasting for the Indian pharmaceutical retail: A case study. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems. 2014 Apr 1;3(2):1-8.
  45. Kahn R, Eyal N, Sow SO, Lipsitch M. Mass drug administration of azithromycin: an analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2023 Mar 1;29(3):326-31.
  46. Henson S. New markets and their supporting institutions: opportunities and constraints for demand growth. World Bank; 2006 Nov.
  47. Dhillon R, Moncur Q. Small-scale farming: A review of challenges and potential opportunities offered by technological advancements. Sustainability. 2023 Oct 31;15(21):15478.
  48. Taylor B, Chiang S, Taylor S. The Price Is Right: Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Term Azithromycin for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2023 Dec;20(12):1707-8.
  49. Bani? Tomiši? Z, Ini? S. Pharmaceutical company PLIVA: from Nobel laureate Vladimir Prelog to global blockbuster?antibiotic azithromycin. Die Pharmazie-An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024 Dec 30;79(10-11):246-57.
  50. Payne DJ, Miller LF, Findlay D, Anderson J, Marks L. Time for a change: addressing R&D and commercialisation challenges for antibacterials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015 Jun 5;370(1670):20140086.
  51. Ma L, Fei B. Comprehensive review of surgical microscopes: technology development and medical applications. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2021 Jan 31;26(1):010901-.
  52. Kienzler M, Kowalkowski C. Pricing strategy: A review of 22 years of marketing research. Journal of Business Research. 2017 Sep 1;78:101-10.
  53. Skitmore M, Smyth H. Marketing and pricing strategy. Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies. 2009 Sep 15:92-111.
  54. Ali BJ, Anwar G. Marketing Strategy: Pricing strategies and their influence on consumer purchasing decisions. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G.(2021). Marketing Strategy: Pricing strategies and their influence on consumer purchasing decisions. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research. 2021;5(2):26-39.
  55. Verghese NR, Barrenetxea J, Bhargava Y, Agrawal S, Finkelstein EA. Government pharmaceutical pricing strategies in the Asia-Pacific region: an overview. Journal of market access & health policy. 2019 Jan 1;7(1):1601060.
  56. Khoso I, Ahmed RR, Ahmed J. Pricing strategies in pharmaceutical marketing. The Pharma Innovation. 2014 Sep 1;3(7, Part A):13.
  57. Frank RG, Shahzad M, Kesselheim AS, Feldman W. Biosimilar competition: early learning. Health economics. 2022 Apr;31(4):647-63.
  58. Van der Merwe Smit E, Bredenkamp J. Originator and generic medicine: pricing and market share. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing. 2013 Jun 21;7(2):104-19.
  59. Biggs AG. An options pricing method for calculating the market price of public sector pension liabilities. Public Budgeting & Finance. 2011 Sep;31(3):94-118.
  60. Oklander M, Chukurna ?, Oklander T, Yashkina O. Methodical approach to calculating information value in pricing policy in supply chains. Studies of Applied Economics. 2020;38(4).
  61. DAVID A. Threshold of Affordability. Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology. 1987 Jun 30:85.
  62. Alexandrescu, MB, Milandru, M. Promotion as a form of Communication of the Marketing Strategy. Land Forces Academy Review. 2018 Dec;23(4):268-74.
  63. Rowley J. Promotion and marketing communications in the information marketplace. Library review. 1998 Dec 1;47(8):383-7.
  64. Shankar V. Strategic marketing decision models for the pharmaceutical industry. In Handbook of marketing decision models, 2008 Sep 5 (pp. 469-498). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  65. Singh M. Marketing mix of 4P’s for competitive advantage. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 2012 Sep;3(6):40-5.
  66. Wang K, Wang Y, Yao J. A comparative study on marketing mix models for digital products. In International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics 2005 Dec 15 (pp. 660-669). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  67. Bandyopadhyay N. A conceptual understanding of the impact of marketspace on the four Ps of marketing. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):33-42.
  68. Goi CL. A review of the marketing mix: 4Ps or more. International journal of marketing studies. 2009 May 1;1(1):2-15.
  69. Jager W. The four Ps in social simulation, a perspective on how marketing could benefit from the use of social simulation. Journal of Business Research. 2007 Aug 1;60(8):868-75.
  70. Rowley J. Promotion and marketing communications in the information marketplace. Library review. 1998 Dec 1;47(8):383-7.
  71. Magrath AJ. When marketing services, the 4 Ps are not enough. Business Horizons. 1986 May 1;29(3):44-50.
  72. Wilson MG, Olds RS. Application of the marketing mix to health promotion marketing. Journal of Health Education. 1991 Aug 1;22(4):254-9.
  73. Håkansson H, Waluszewski A. Developing a new understanding of markets: reinterpreting the 4Ps. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2005 May 1;20(3):110-7.
  74. Constantinides E. The 4S web-marketing mix model. Electronic commerce research and applications. 2002 Mar 1;1(1):57-76.
  75. Kanavos P, Schurer W, Vogler S. The pharmaceutical distribution chain in the European Union: structure and impact on pharmaceutical prices.
  76. Farris P, Olver J, De Kluyver C. The relationship between distribution and market share. Marketing Science. 1989 May;8(2):107-28.
  77. Bowersox DJ. Physical distribution development, current status, and potential. Journal of Marketing. 1969 Jan;33(1):63-70.
  78. Magee JF, Copacino WC, Rosenfield DB. Modern logistics management: Integrating marketing, manufacturing and physical distribution. John Wiley & Sons; 1985 Oct 2.
  79. Khoukhi S, Bojji C, Bensouda Y. A review of medical distribution logistics in pharmaceutical supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 2019;34(3):297-326.
  80. SEYOUM W. FACTORS AFFECTING PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS: THE CASE OF ETHIOPIAN PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY AGENCY (Doctoral dissertation, ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY).
  81. Narenjian A, Riahi A, Kheirabadi MA. Supply chain management and analysis of pharmaceutical distribution models in pharmaceutical companies. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies. 2019 Jul;10(15):1-5.
  82. Moreno A, Angulo I, Perallos A, Landaluce H, Zuazola IJ, Azpilicueta L, Astrain JJ, Falcone F, Villadangos J. IVAN: Intelligent van for the distribution of pharmaceutical drugs. Sensors. 2012 May 18;12(5):6587-609.
  83. Draskovic N. The marketing role of packaging: a review. International Journal of Management Cases. 2007 Jan 1;9(3-4):315-23.
  84. Underwood RL, Klein NM. Packaging as brand communication: effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. Journal of marketing theory and practice. 2002 Oct 1;10(4):58-68.
  85. Dobson P, Yadav A. Packaging in a market economy: The economic and commercial role of packaging communication.
  86. Kelly M, McCann JR, Chapple CI, Woods J, Russell CG. Visual communication design: a neglected factor in nutrition promotion via packaged food labels. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;12:1296704.
  87. Kádeková Z, Koši?iarová I, Vav?e?ka V, Džupina M. The impact of packaging on consumer behaviour in the private label market—The case of Slovak consumers under 25 years of age. Innov. Mark. 2020;16:62-73.

Reference

  1. Mishuk AU, Fasina I, Qian J. Impact of US federal and state generic drug policies on drug use, spending, and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2020 Jun 1;16(6):736-45.
  2. Mogolian E, Mrydral P. What’s the difference between brand-name and generic prescription drugs? Sci Am. 2004:12-3.
  3. Suggala S, Mandan R, Unadkat P. CASE 7 Medkart: Contemplating the Business Strategy. Searching Alternatives: Case Studies in Management & Entrepreneurship. 2023 Oct 30.
  4. Bakheit AH, Al-Hadiya BM, Abd-Elgalil AA. Azithromycin. Profiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology. 2014 Jan 1;39:1-40.
  5. Peters DH, Friedel HA, McTavish D. Azithromycin: a review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy. Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):750-99.
  6. Ballow CH, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: the first azalide antibiotic. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 1992 Oct;26(10):1253-61.
  7. Hamann D, Williams Jr RL, Omar M. Branding strategy and consumer high?technology product. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2007 Apr 24;16(2):98-111.
  8. Arthur Rooney J. Branding: a trend for today and tomorrow. Journal of product & brand management. 1995 Oct 1;4(4):48-55.
  9. Arthur Rooney J. Branding: a trend for today and tomorrow. Journal of product & brand management. 1995 Oct 1;4(4):48-55.
  10. Tzokas N, Hultink EJ, Hart S. Navigating the new product development process. Industrial marketing management. 2004 Oct 1;33(7):619-26.
  11. Schilling MA, Hill CW. Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Perspectives. 1998 Aug 1;12(3):67-81.
  12. Me?ep?nar E, Vayvay Ö, Kalender ZT, Tu?çe Kalender Z. Management Of Idea-to-Product Process For Successful New Product Development In Pharmaceutical Industry. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 101.
  13. Lilien GL, Morrison PD, Searls K, Sonnack M, Hippel EV. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management science. 2002 Aug;48(8):1042-59.
  14. Sozo V, Ogliari A. Stimulating design team creativity based on emotional values: A study on idea generation in the early stages of new product development processes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2019 Mar 1;70:38-50.
  15. Hammedi W, van Riel AC, Sasovova Z. Antecedents and consequences of reflexivity in new product idea screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2011 Sep;28(5):662-79.
  16. Polon AJ. Pharmaceutical Product Development from Concept to Market. In Drug Development 2019 Jun 12 (pp. 107-124). CRC Press.
  17. Schlapp J, Schumacher G. Delegated concept testing in new product development. Operations Research. 2022 Sep;70(5):2732-48.
  18. Jagpal S, Jedidi K, Jamil M. A Multibrand Concept?Testing Methodology for New Product Strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2007 Jan;24(1):34-51.
  19. Thomke S, Bell DE. Sequential testing in product development. Management Science. 2001 Feb;47(2):308-23.
  20. Thomke S, Bell DE. Sequential testing in product development. Management Science. 2001 Feb;47(2):308-23.
  21. Zemlickiene V, Maditinos D. Marketing strategy formulation for innovative product development process. Business: Theory and Practice. 2012 Dec 31;13:365.
  22. Freng Svendsen M, Haugland SA, Grønhaug K, Hammervoll T. Marketing strategy and customer involvement in product development. European Journal of Marketing. 2011 Apr 5;45(4):513-30.
  23. Sharma A, Lacey N. Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: The case of the US pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004 Sep;21(5):297-308.
  24. Storey C, Easingwood C. The impact of the new product development project on the success of financial services. Service Industries Journal. 1993 Jul 1;13(3):40-54.
  25. Buonansegna E, Salomo S, Maier AM, Li?Ying J. Pharmaceutical new product development: why do clinical trials fail?. R&D Management. 2014 Mar;44(2):189-202.
  26. Prašnikar J, Škerlj T. New product development process and time-to-market in the generic pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Marketing Management. 2006 Aug 1;35(6):690-702.
  27. Becker MC, Lillemark M. Marketing/R&D integration in the pharmaceutical industry. Research policy. 2006 Feb 1;35(1):105-20.
  28. Polon AJ. Pharmaceutical Product Development from Concept to Market. In Drug Development 2019 Jun 12 (pp. 107-124). CRC Press.
  29. Sharma A, Lacey N. Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: The case of the US pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004 Sep;21(5):297-308.
  30. Shah M. Commercialisation strategy for the pharmaceutical industry. Delft University of Technology. 2019 Oct 30.
  31. Ahmed RR, Vveinhardt J. Product development & commercialisation in the pharmaceutical industry. The Pharma Innovation. 2014 Nov 1;3(9, Part A):40.
  32. Prajapati V, Dureja H. Product lifecycle management in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Medical Marketing. 2012 Aug;12(3):150-8.
  33. Bungau S, Bungau C, Tit DM. Studies on the last stage of product lifecycle management for a pharmaceutical product. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):56-62.
  34. Ponnusamy SK, Ragini YP. Product Lifecycle in the Pharmaceutical Industry. In Global Supply Chains in the Pharmaceutical Industry 2019 (pp. 112-132). IGI Global.
  35. Prajapati V, Dureja H. Product lifecycle management in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Medical Marketing. 2012 Aug;12(3):150-8.
  36. Bungau S, Bungau C, Tit DM. Studies on the last stage of product lifecycle management for a pharmaceutical product. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):56-62.
  37. Nagar A, Jena D. PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT.
  38. Naneva N. Marketing Strategies During the Product Life Cycle in the Pharmaceutical Industry (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  39. Tripathy S, Prajapati V, Sengodan Guruswamy V. Product Life Cycle Management for Pharmaceutical Innovation. Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs. 2015 Dec 1;2(3):145-52.
  40. Hein T, Winkler M, Gulati H, Balakrishnan A. Product lifecycle management for the pharmaceutical industry. Oracle Life Sciences. 2012:1-2.
  41. Schmidt RÄ, Pioch EA. Community pharmacies under pressure–can branding help?. International journal of retail & distribution management. 2005 Jul 1;33(7):494-504.
  42. Bednarik, J. Does brand differentiate pharmaceuticals? Neuroendocrinology Letters. 2005 Dec 1;26(6):635-52.
  43. Wilkie DC, Johnson LW, White L. Strategies used to defend pharmaceutical brands from generics. European Journal of Marketing. 2012 Sep 14;46(9):1195-214.
  44. Anusha SL, Alok S, Shaik A. Demand forecasting for the Indian pharmaceutical retail: A case study. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems. 2014 Apr 1;3(2):1-8.
  45. Kahn R, Eyal N, Sow SO, Lipsitch M. Mass drug administration of azithromycin: an analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2023 Mar 1;29(3):326-31.
  46. Henson S. New markets and their supporting institutions: opportunities and constraints for demand growth. World Bank; 2006 Nov.
  47. Dhillon R, Moncur Q. Small-scale farming: A review of challenges and potential opportunities offered by technological advancements. Sustainability. 2023 Oct 31;15(21):15478.
  48. Taylor B, Chiang S, Taylor S. The Price Is Right: Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Term Azithromycin for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2023 Dec;20(12):1707-8.
  49. Bani? Tomiši? Z, Ini? S. Pharmaceutical company PLIVA: from Nobel laureate Vladimir Prelog to global blockbuster?antibiotic azithromycin. Die Pharmazie-An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024 Dec 30;79(10-11):246-57.
  50. Payne DJ, Miller LF, Findlay D, Anderson J, Marks L. Time for a change: addressing R&D and commercialisation challenges for antibacterials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015 Jun 5;370(1670):20140086.
  51. Ma L, Fei B. Comprehensive review of surgical microscopes: technology development and medical applications. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2021 Jan 31;26(1):010901-.
  52. Kienzler M, Kowalkowski C. Pricing strategy: A review of 22 years of marketing research. Journal of Business Research. 2017 Sep 1;78:101-10.
  53. Skitmore M, Smyth H. Marketing and pricing strategy. Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies. 2009 Sep 15:92-111.
  54. Ali BJ, Anwar G. Marketing Strategy: Pricing strategies and their influence on consumer purchasing decisions. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G.(2021). Marketing Strategy: Pricing strategies and their influence on consumer purchasing decisions. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research. 2021;5(2):26-39.
  55. Verghese NR, Barrenetxea J, Bhargava Y, Agrawal S, Finkelstein EA. Government pharmaceutical pricing strategies in the Asia-Pacific region: an overview. Journal of market access & health policy. 2019 Jan 1;7(1):1601060.
  56. Khoso I, Ahmed RR, Ahmed J. Pricing strategies in pharmaceutical marketing. The Pharma Innovation. 2014 Sep 1;3(7, Part A):13.
  57. Frank RG, Shahzad M, Kesselheim AS, Feldman W. Biosimilar competition: early learning. Health economics. 2022 Apr;31(4):647-63.
  58. Van der Merwe Smit E, Bredenkamp J. Originator and generic medicine: pricing and market share. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing. 2013 Jun 21;7(2):104-19.
  59. Biggs AG. An options pricing method for calculating the market price of public sector pension liabilities. Public Budgeting & Finance. 2011 Sep;31(3):94-118.
  60. Oklander M, Chukurna ?, Oklander T, Yashkina O. Methodical approach to calculating information value in pricing policy in supply chains. Studies of Applied Economics. 2020;38(4).
  61. DAVID A. Threshold of Affordability. Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology. 1987 Jun 30:85.
  62. Alexandrescu, MB, Milandru, M. Promotion as a form of Communication of the Marketing Strategy. Land Forces Academy Review. 2018 Dec;23(4):268-74.
  63. Rowley J. Promotion and marketing communications in the information marketplace. Library review. 1998 Dec 1;47(8):383-7.
  64. Shankar V. Strategic marketing decision models for the pharmaceutical industry. In Handbook of marketing decision models, 2008 Sep 5 (pp. 469-498). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  65. Singh M. Marketing mix of 4P’s for competitive advantage. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 2012 Sep;3(6):40-5.
  66. Wang K, Wang Y, Yao J. A comparative study on marketing mix models for digital products. In International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics 2005 Dec 15 (pp. 660-669). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  67. Bandyopadhyay N. A conceptual understanding of the impact of marketspace on the four Ps of marketing. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):33-42.
  68. Goi CL. A review of the marketing mix: 4Ps or more. International journal of marketing studies. 2009 May 1;1(1):2-15.
  69. Jager W. The four Ps in social simulation, a perspective on how marketing could benefit from the use of social simulation. Journal of Business Research. 2007 Aug 1;60(8):868-75.
  70. Rowley J. Promotion and marketing communications in the information marketplace. Library review. 1998 Dec 1;47(8):383-7.
  71. Magrath AJ. When marketing services, the 4 Ps are not enough. Business Horizons. 1986 May 1;29(3):44-50.
  72. Wilson MG, Olds RS. Application of the marketing mix to health promotion marketing. Journal of Health Education. 1991 Aug 1;22(4):254-9.
  73. Håkansson H, Waluszewski A. Developing a new understanding of markets: reinterpreting the 4Ps. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2005 May 1;20(3):110-7.
  74. Constantinides E. The 4S web-marketing mix model. Electronic commerce research and applications. 2002 Mar 1;1(1):57-76.
  75. Kanavos P, Schurer W, Vogler S. The pharmaceutical distribution chain in the European Union: structure and impact on pharmaceutical prices.
  76. Farris P, Olver J, De Kluyver C. The relationship between distribution and market share. Marketing Science. 1989 May;8(2):107-28.
  77. Bowersox DJ. Physical distribution development, current status, and potential. Journal of Marketing. 1969 Jan;33(1):63-70.
  78. Magee JF, Copacino WC, Rosenfield DB. Modern logistics management: Integrating marketing, manufacturing and physical distribution. John Wiley & Sons; 1985 Oct 2.
  79. Khoukhi S, Bojji C, Bensouda Y. A review of medical distribution logistics in pharmaceutical supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 2019;34(3):297-326.
  80. SEYOUM W. FACTORS AFFECTING PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS: THE CASE OF ETHIOPIAN PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY AGENCY (Doctoral dissertation, ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY).
  81. Narenjian A, Riahi A, Kheirabadi MA. Supply chain management and analysis of pharmaceutical distribution models in pharmaceutical companies. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies. 2019 Jul;10(15):1-5.
  82. Moreno A, Angulo I, Perallos A, Landaluce H, Zuazola IJ, Azpilicueta L, Astrain JJ, Falcone F, Villadangos J. IVAN: Intelligent van for the distribution of pharmaceutical drugs. Sensors. 2012 May 18;12(5):6587-609.
  83. Draskovic N. The marketing role of packaging: a review. International Journal of Management Cases. 2007 Jan 1;9(3-4):315-23.
  84. Underwood RL, Klein NM. Packaging as brand communication: effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. Journal of marketing theory and practice. 2002 Oct 1;10(4):58-68.
  85. Dobson P, Yadav A. Packaging in a market economy: The economic and commercial role of packaging communication.
  86. Kelly M, McCann JR, Chapple CI, Woods J, Russell CG. Visual communication design: a neglected factor in nutrition promotion via packaged food labels. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;12:1296704.
  87. Kádeková Z, Koši?iarová I, Vav?e?ka V, Džupina M. The impact of packaging on consumer behaviour in the private label market—The case of Slovak consumers under 25 years of age. Innov. Mark. 2020;16:62-73.

Photo
Mohanraja P R
Corresponding author

Sree Siddaganga College of Pharmacy, Gokula Extension, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Batawadi, Tumkur, Karnataka 572102

Photo
Akshob N
Co-author

Sree Siddaganga College of Pharmacy, Gokula Extension, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Batawadi, Tumkur, Karnataka 572102

Photo
Deepaknath R
Co-author

Sree Siddaganga College of Pharmacy, Gokula Extension, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Batawadi, Tumkur, Karnataka 572102

Photo
Nisha S R
Co-author

Sree Siddaganga College of Pharmacy, Gokula Extension, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Batawadi, Tumkur, Karnataka 572102

Mohanraja P R, Akshob N, Deepaknath R, Nisha S R, Marketing Development of Affordable Medicine, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 1, 3233-3256. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18397308

More related articles
A Comprehensive Review On Analytical Method Develo...
Amol Amrutkar, Smita Aher, Rishikesh Bachhav, ...
Strategic Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluat...
Sreena K, Muhammed Shafah K P C, Ashique P, Thabsseera K P, Shaha...
A Compressive Review on Pharmacological and Toxicological Study of Langenaria Si...
Anushka Kunjir, Komal Khartode, Snehal Khartode, Shubhangi Kharmate, Dr.Amol Lavate, ...
Impact Of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on The Synthesis of Carotenoids in Cladophora ...
Rama Kant, Nida Ziyaul, Kuntal Sarma, Doli, Deepti Gupta, Gauri, ...
Related Articles
A Review On Insights Of Professional Sales Representative And Marketing Strategi...
Sayali V. Pawar, Pratiksha N. Sapkal, Dhanaji A. Jadhav, Rutuja A. Jadhav, Mayur R. More, Rahul D. M...
Systematic Review on Overview of The Closed-Loop Vs Open-Loop Insulin Pump Syste...
Vaibhav Bhone, Gaurav Tambe, Tanushka Tambe, Aditya Yadav, ...
More related articles
A Comprehensive Review On Analytical Method Development And Validation...
Amol Amrutkar, Smita Aher, Rishikesh Bachhav, ...
Strategic Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Indole Linked Thiazolid...
Sreena K, Muhammed Shafah K P C, Ashique P, Thabsseera K P, Shaharban T K, Abid T P, Thejas T, ...
A Comprehensive Review On Analytical Method Development And Validation...
Amol Amrutkar, Smita Aher, Rishikesh Bachhav, ...
Strategic Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Indole Linked Thiazolid...
Sreena K, Muhammed Shafah K P C, Ashique P, Thabsseera K P, Shaharban T K, Abid T P, Thejas T, ...