View Article

Abstract

Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan belongs to the anti-diabetic drugs. Development and validation of Simple, Precise and Accurate RP-HPLC method for estimation of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan in solid dosage form. The validation of this method was achieved as per ICH Q2 (R2) guidelines with the optimized experimental conditions. To achieve the proposed method on Intsil C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) column as Stationary Phase and run time was 10 min. The Mobile Phase consists of Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25v/v). UV detection was carried out at 272nm. Linearity co-relation co-efficient found is 0.999. The method was validated by determining its accuracy, linearity and precision. The proposed method is simple, precise, economical and hence can be applied for routine quality control of esmolol hydrochloride in semi solid dosage form.

Keywords

Dapagliflozin, Telmisartan, RP-HPLC, solid Dosage Form, Accuracy, Linearity and Precision.

Introduction

Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate

Dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate is an oral antidiabetic agent that belongs to the class of SGLT2 (sodium-glucose co-transporter-2) inhibitors. It works by inhibiting SGLT2 in the renal proximal tubules, reducing glucose reabsorption and increasing urinary glucose excretion, thereby lowering blood glucose levels. It is primarily used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and also has beneficial effects in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The propanediol monohydrate form enhances its solubility and stability. Dapagliflozin is generally well-tolerated, with common side effects including urinary tract infections, genital infections, and increased urination. It may also cause volume depletion and, rarely, euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis.

Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate

Telmisartan

Telmisartan is used alone or in combination with other classes of antihypertensive agents in the management of hypertension. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists, such as telmisartan, are considered one of several preferred antihypertensive drugs for the initial management of hypertension according to current evidence-based hypertension guidelines; other preferred options include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics.

Telmisartan

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Materials

  1. Name of API: Dapagliflozin Source: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals LTD.
  2. Name of API: Telmisartan Source: CTX Life science

Instrumentation:

  1. High presuure liquid chromatography Make and model: Shimadzu (LC 100)
  2. Weighing balance  

Make and Model: Mettler Toledo

  1. Metlting point apparatus

Make and model: Gallenkamp (889339)

  1. UV double beam spectrophotometer

Make and model: Shimadzu (UV 1800)

Chemicals and Reagents: Dapagliflozin API, Telmisartan API Acetonitrile HPLC Grade, Phosphate Buffer, Ortho phosphoric acid, Hydrochloric Acid, Methanol HPLC Grade, Water: Distill water(Milli-Q), HPLC grade water.

Preparation of Mobile Phase: RP-HPLC method was followed by isocratic elution technique. Mobile phase comprised of Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25 v/v %) ratio because it elutes both drugs peak efficiently in short time with satisfactory resolution, tailing factor and theoretical plates.

Preparation of Standard Stock Solution A: (Dapagliflozin Stock Solution): Accurately weighed quantity of Dapagliflozin 10 mg was transferred into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolved in methanol and diluted up to mark with methanol. This will give a stock solution having strength of 100 μg/mL.Withdraw 0.5 ml from Stock Solution and make up to 10 ml with to get 5 μg/mL.

Preparation of Standard Stock Solution B: (Telmisartan stock solution): Accurately weighed quantity of Telmisartan 10 mg was transferred into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolved in methanol and diluted up to mark with methanol. This will give a stock solution having strength of 100 μg/mL. Withdraw 2 ml from Stock Solution and make up to 10 ml with to get 20 μg/mL. Preparation of system suitability solution: Take standard solution for system suitability.

Chromatographic Conditions:

The chromatographic separation of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan were achieved on C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm) by using mobile phase composed of Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25 v/v/v %), at flow rate 1.0 ml/min with run time of 10 minutes. Detection of both drugs was carried out at 272 nm by using diluent as mobile phase.

IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

The identification of taken standard API for experimental work had done for confirmation of its identity, standard quality and purity. The identification had done by taking IR and UV spectra, solubility study and melting point determination.

Solubility Study

The solubility of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan practically determined separately by taking 100 mg of both the drugs in 100 ml volumetric flasks, adding required quantity of solvent at room temperature and shaken for few minutes. Solubility data for each study was observed and recorded in Table 2.0

Table 1.0 Solubility Table

Description Terms

Relative Quantities of solvent for 1 Parts of solute

Very soluble

Less than 1 part

Freely soluble

From 1 to 10 parts

Soluble

From 10 to 30 parts

Sparingly soluble

From 30 to 100 parts

Slightly soluble

From 300 to 1000 parts

Very slightly soluble

From 1000 to 10000 parts

Practically Insoluble

More than 10000 parts

 

Table 2.0 Solubility Data for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Solvent

Dapagliflozin

Telmisartan

Water

Very Soluble

Slightly soluble

Chloroform

Practically Insoluble

Very soluble

0.1 N HCL

Soluble

Practically Insoluble

Acetonitrile

Soluble

Soluble

Methanol

Soluble

Slightly Soluble

Ethanol

Soluble

Slightly Soluble

Identification by Melting Point Determination

Melting point of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan hydrochloride has been determined. The melting points of the compounds were taken by open capillary method

Table 3.0 Melting Point of Drugs

Sr. No.

API

Melting point (?C)

Reported

Measured

1

Dapagliflozin

77 °C

74-78°C

2

Telmisartan

262°C

261-263°C

IR Spectra:

Dapagliflozin

Fig. 1 Structure of Dapagliflozin

Fig 2: IR Spectra of Dapagliflozin

Table 4.0 IR Interpretation Spectra for Dapagliflozin

Groups

General Range(cm-1)

Observed Range(cm-1)

O-H (s)

3400-3200

3352.28

C-O (s)

1100-11050

1834.55

C-H (s)

2690-2850

2932

C-N (s)

1240-2260

1286

C=O (s)

1640-1680

1655

C≡C (b)

700-1100

763

Telmisartan

Fig 3 Structure of Telmisartan

Fig 4: IR Spectra of Telmisartan

Table 5 IR Interpretation Spectra for Telmisartan

Groups

General Range(cm-1)

Observed Range(cm-1)

C-H (s)

3300-2800

2943

O-H(s)

3400-3200

3308

C=O (s)

1670-1750

1695

N-H (s)

3500-3300

3369

CH3(b)

1680-1300

1455

CAC (aromatic bond)

1700-1100

1599

CAH bend

1600-1200

1460

METHOD DEVELOPMENT

SELECTION OF WAVELENGTH:

To determine wavelength for measurement, standard spectra of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan were scanned between 200-400 nm against diluents. Absorbance maxima of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan detected at 272 nm. Chromatogram was taken at 272 nm, both drugs give good peak height and shape. So, 272 nm was selected for Simultaneous estimation of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan their formulation.

SELECTION OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS

Proper selection of the HPLC method depends upon the nature of the sample (ionic or ionisable or neutral molecule), its molecular weight, pKa and solubility. RP-HPLC was selected for the initial separation based on literature survey and its simplicity and suitability. To optimize the chromatographic conditions the effect of chromatographic variables such as mobile phase, flow rate and solvent ratio were studied. Finally, the chromatographic condition was chosen that give the best resolution, symmetry and capacity factor for estimation of both drugs.

SELECTION OF COLUMN

For RP-HPLC Method, various columns are available but based on literature survey C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm) was selected over the other columns.

METHOD VALIDATION

As per ICH guideline (Q2R1), the method validation parameters studied were specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of detection, limit of quantitation and robustness.

Specificity

The analytical method for specificity was evaluated by injecting the following solutions. Diluent was prepared and inject into the HPLC system in triplicate. Sample solution was prepared with appropriate levels of excipients as a placebo sample and inject into the HPLC system in triplicate for all the dosage strengths. Placebo was prepared by mixing all excipients without active ingredients. Standard and sample solutions were prepared for assay (100% Conc.) and inject into the HPLC system in triplicate.

Linearity and Range

Preparation of Solution for linearity studies: For the purpose of linearity, accurately weighed amount of Dapagliflozin (10 mg), and Telmisartan (10 mg) was taken into the volumetric flask (10 ml) and volume of the flask was raised to 10 ml with methyl alcohol to give stock solution containing 100 µg/ml of Dapagliflozin, and 100 µg/ml of Telmisartan. Various aliquots from this stock solution were transferred to another 10 ml volumetric flask and volume was raised to the mark with mobile phase to give final solutions containing containing 5+20, 7.5+25, 10+30, 12.5+35 and 15+40 µg/ml of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan respectively.

Precision

Prepared standard working solution of mixtures having concentration of Dapagliflozin (5 μg/ml) and Telmisartan (20 μg/ml) were injected at volume of 20 μL into column by employing optimized chromatographic conditions. Each standard mixture was injected 5 time and peak area was monitored. Each concentration was monitored for repeatability by RSD.

Intra-day and Inter-day Precision

Method precision was determined by performing intraday and inter day precision.

Mixture that represents overall range (Dapagliflozin +Telmisartan = 5+20, 10+30 and 15+40 µg/ml) were analyzed on same day at different time interval for intraday precision.

Mixture that represents overall range (Dapagliflozin +Telmisartan = 5+20, 10+30 and 15+40 µg/ml) were analyzed on different days for inter-day precision.

System Suitability Parameters

Solution of Dapagliflozin + Telmisartan (5+20 μg.ml-1) was injected 3 times for determination of System suitability parameters which includes Retention time (Rt), Tailing factor (Tf), Resolution (Rs) and number of theoretical plates. System suitability parameters   for selected concentration were determined by C.V.

Accuracy

Accuracy of the analytical method has been performed by spiking of sample with the standard. Spiking of the placebo was performed at 50,100 and 150 % of the target concentration

Limit of detection and Limit of Quantification

The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated using the standard deviation of y-intercept of calibration curve. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ):

LOQ = 10 σ/s and LOD = 3.3 σ/s

          Where, σ = the standard deviation of the response.

          S = the slope of the calibration curve

Robustness

Following parameters were altered one by one for determination of robustness of the method and their effect was observed by comparing with the standard preparation. Mobile phase flowrate (± 0.1 mL/min), optimized flowrate was 1.0 mL/min. Mobile phase composition (± 2 mL), in optimized ratio 2 determinations of Dapagliflozin + Telmisartan = 5+20 µg/mL for each alteration were carried out and RSD was measured.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

SELECTION OF WAVELENGTH

To determine wavelength for measurement, standard spectra of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan were scanned between 200-400 nm against diluents. Absorbance maxima of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan have detected at 272 nm. Chromatogram was taken at 272 nm, both drugs give good peak height and shape. So, 272 nm was selected for Simultaneous estimation of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan in their formulation.

Fig 5.0: UV Graph for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

SELECTION OF MOBILE PHASE

Trail 1

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile: Water (30:70v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10 minutes

Observations: No peak detected.

Fig 6 Trial 1: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Acetonitrile: Water (30:70v/v)

Trail 2

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile: Water (50:50v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10 minutes

Observations: Only one Peak detected but broad peaks observe.

Fig 7 Trial 2: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Acetonitrile: Water (50:50v/v)

Trail 3

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:Water (80:20v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10 minutes

Observations: Only one Peak detected but broad peaks observe.

Fig 8 Trial 3: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Acetonitrile: Water(80:20v/v)

Trail 4

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Methanol: Phosphate Buffer(60:40v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10minutes

Observations: only one peak detected.

Fig 9 Trial 4: Chromatogram of Methanol : Phosphate Buffer(60:40v/v)

Trail 5

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Methanol: Phosphate Buffer(70:30v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10minutes

Observations: only one peak detected

 

Fig 10 Trial 5: Chromatogram of Methanol: Phosphate Buffer(70:30v/v)

Trail 6

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Methanol: Phosphate Buffer(50:50v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10minutes

Observations: Peaks detected and separated, but broad peaks observe.

Fig 11 Trial 6: Chromatogram of Methanol: Phosphate Buffer (50:50v/v)

Trail 7

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Ortho phosphoric acid: acetonitrile (80:20 v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10 minutes

Observations: No peak detected.

Fig 12 Trial 7: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Ortho phosphoric acid: acetonitrile (80:20 v/v)

Trail 8

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Ortho phosphoric acid: acetonitrile (60:40 v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10 minutes

Observations: Peaks detected and separated, but broad peaks observe.

Fig 13 Trial 8: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Ortho phosphoric acid: acetonitrile (60:40 v/v)

Trial 9

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:Methanol(50:50v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10minutes

Observations: Only one peak detected with broad spectrum.

Fig 14 Trial 9: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Acetonitrile: Methanol (50:50v/v)

Trail 10

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:Methanol(60:40v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10minutes

Observations: Peaks detected and separated, but broad peaks observe

Fig 15 Trial 10: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Acetonitrile: Methanol (60:40v/v)

Trial 11 (Final Trial)

Column: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10minutes

Observations: Good peaks with Adequate solution was observed.

Fig 16 Trial 11: Chromatogram of Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25v/v)

7.3 Chromatographic conditions for optimized mobile phase trial

Stationary phase: C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25v/v)

Detection: 272 nm

Flow rate:1 ml/min

Run Time: 10 minutes

Detector: UV detector

Injection volume: 20 μl

Column Temperature: 40ºC

Mode: Isocretic

Fig 17: Optimized mobile phase trial for optimized chromatogram of Std.Dapagliflozin:5.115 min, Telmisartan: 2.225 min

Fig 18: Chromatogram of blank Dapagliflozin: Telmisartan (75:25v/v)

Method Validation

Linearity

For the purpose of linearity, accurately weighed amount of Dapagliflozin (10 mg), and Telmisartan (10 mg) was taken into the volumetric flask (10 ml) and volume of the flask was raised to 10 ml with methyl alcohol to give stock solution containing 100 µg/ml of Dapagliflozin, and 100 µg/ml of Telmisartan. Various aliquots from this stock solution were transferred to another 10 ml volumetric flask and volume was raised to the mark with mobile phase to give final solutions containing 5+20, 7.5+25, 10+30, 12.5+35 and 15+40 µg/ml of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan respectively.

Table 6 Linearity data for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Conc.

(µg/ml)

Dapagliflozin

Mean Area

± SD (n=5)

% RSD

5

422791

422791 ± 149.01

0.04

7.5

674800

674800± 306.25

0.05

10

845650

845650 ± 1086.79

0.13

12.5

1037038

1037038 ± 1749.10

0.17

15

1255681

1255681 ± 785.041

0.06

 

Conc.

(µg/ml)

Telmisartan

Mean Area

± SD (n=5)

% RSD

20

236694

236694 ± 384.23

0.16

25

375582

375582 ± 117.15

0.03

30

475651

475651 ± 851.10

0.18

35

572783

572783 ± 171.96

0.03

40

713430

713430 ± 349.60

0.05

 

Fig 19: Overlain Linearity Spectra of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Fig 20: Calibration curve of Dapagliflozin

Fig 21: Calibration curve of Telmisartan

Table 7 Linearity results for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Regression Analysis

Dapagliflozin

Telmisartan

Concentration Range

5-15 μg/mL

20-40 μg/mL

Regression equation

y = 85671x - 1519.6

y = 23013x - 215577

Correlation co-efficient

0.9918

0.9949


Precision

Repeatability

The data for repeatability for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan is shown in table 8. The % R.S.D For Repeatability data was found to be 1.10 % for LID and 1.45 % for DIL.

Table 8 Repeatability data for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Drugs

Conc. (µg/ml)

Mean Peak Area ± SD

%RSD

Dapagliflozin

5

472972.68 ± 2521.25

0.53

Telmisartan

20

6838879 ± 3156.26

0.46

Inter-day precision

The data for interday precision for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan is shown in table 9. The % R.S.D for intraday precision was found to be 0.37-1.71 % for Dapagliflozin and 0.36-1.22 % for Telmisartan.

Table 9 Inter-day precision data for estimation of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Mcg

/ml

Dapagliflozin

Telmisartan

3.75

5

6.25

15

20

25

423561

845342

1254681

232578

471867

715780

428871

849801

1233881

236478

475234

712689

429870

843759

1276801

230908

479290

710634

MEAN

427434

846300.7

1255121

233321.3

475463.7

713034.3

± SD

3391.106

3133.005

21463.38

2855.432

3716.826

2590.322

RSD

0.79

0.37

1.71

1.22

0.78

0.36

 

Intra -day precision

The data for intra-day precision for Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan is shown in table 10. The % R.S.D for intraday precision was found to be 0.20-0.38 % for Dapagliflozin and 0.09-1.26 % for Telmisartan.

Table 10 Intra-day precision data for estimation of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan

Mcg/ml

Dapagliflozin

Telmisartan

3.75

5

6.25

15

20

25

423881

847690

1259802

238890

473568

714254

427781

843523

1254891

238456

479678

714256

428709

849861

1255912

233478

477681

715436

MEAN

426790.3

847024.7

1256868

236941.3

476975.7

714645.7

± SD

2561.925

3220.957

2591.411

3007.174

3115.469

681.8514

RSD

0.60

0.38

0.20

1.26

0.65

0.095


7.4.3 Accuracy

Accuracy of the method was confirmed by recovery study from synthetic mixture at three level standard additions. Percentage recovery for Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan was found to be 99.48- 99.78% and 99.33-100.59 % respectively. The results are shown in table.11-12.

Table 11 Recovery data for Dapagliflozin

 

 

Dapagliflozin

50%

100%

150%

Amount of drug recovered (mg)

%

Recovery

Amount of drug recovered (mg)

%

Recovery

Amount of drug recovered (mg)

%Recovery

1.46

99.76

2.97

99.20

4.54

100.20

1.40

95.70

2.89

99.01

4.56

100.22

1.56

100.50

3.09

100.01

4.68

100.30

Mean

1.49

96.65

2.98

99.43

4.69

100.24

%RSD

0.02

1.30

0.04

1.75

0.05

0.68

 

Table 12 Recovery data for Telmisartan

 

Telmisartan

50%

100%

150%

Amount of drug recovered (mg)

%Recovery

Amount of drug recovered (mg)

%Recovery

Amount of drug recovered (mg)

%Recovery

1.48

99.70

2.96

99.19

4.52

100.17

1.42

95.89

3.05

99.80

4.57

100.28

1.52

100.55

3.01

100.02

4.54

99.80

Mean

1.47

96.65

3.01

99.67

4.54

100.08

%RSD

0.01

1.30

0.06

1.80

0.03

0.63

 

7.4.4 LOD and LOQ

The limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) was found to be as per below:

Table 14 LOD and LOQ Limit for Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan

Dapagliflozin

Telmisartan

LOD(μg/ml)

LOQ(μg/ml)

LOD(μg/ml)

LOQ(μg/ml)

2.24

3.25

3.50

4.19

 

7.4.5 Selectivity

There is no interference in the mixture.

7.4.6 Robustness

The method is found to be robust as the results were not significantly affected by slight variation in Mobile Phase Composition and flow rate of mobile phase. The results are shown in table 15. Variation seen was within the acceptable range respect to peak asymmetry and theoretical plates, so the method was found to be robust.

Table 15 Robustness data for Dapagliflozin & Telmisartan

Parameter

Level of Change

Effect on assay volume

Dapagliflozin                                   Telmisartan

Assay ± SD

RSD

Assay ± SD

RSD

Flow rate

1.0 mL/min

95.70 ±0.50

0.49

95.92±0.48

0.48

1.1 mL/min

101.09 ±0.72

0.72

95.99±0.83

0.83

Mobile phase composition

25:75

95.47 ±0.53

0.53

100.22±1.43

1.43

23:77

95.39 ±0.99

0.98

100.04 ±1.06

1.06

27:73

99.51 ±0.67

0.67

99.45±0.77

0.78

 

7.4.7 Analysis of marketed product

The proposed method was successfully applied to analysis of the commercially available tablet formulation.  The % drugs were found satisfactory, which is comparable with the corresponding label claim.

Table 16 Analysis of marketed formulations

Drug

Amount taken (µg/mL)

Amount found (µg/mL)

% Assy

Dapagliflozin

5

2.93±0.04

99.80 ±1.20

Telmisartan

20

3.03 ±0.10

100.70±1.07

 

7.5 Summary of Method Validation

Table 7.17 Summary of validation parameter of RP-HPLC method

Optimized chromatographic Condition

Stationary Phase

C-18 (id 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase

Acetonitrile: Methanol (75:25v/v)

Detection wave Length

272 nm

Flow rate

1 ml/minute

Run time

10 minutes

Retention Time

Dapagliflozin: 5.115 min, Telmisartan: 2.225 min.

 

Validation parameters

Parameter

Limit

Result

Conclusion

Dapagliflozin

Telmisartan

Linearity and Range

R2> 0.995

0.9975 (5-15µg/mL)

0.9998

(20-40µg/mL)

Method was linear

Repeatability

RSD<2

0.09-0.64

0.10-0.87

Method was repeatable

LOD

-

2.24

3.50

-

LOQ

-

3.25

4.19

-

Intra-day Precision

       RSD<2

0.37-1.71

0.36-1.22

Method was precise

Inter-Day Precision

RSD<2

0.20-0.38

0.09-1.26

Method was precise

%Recovery

98-102%

99.35 ±0.83– 100.01±0.03 %

100.22±0.21 – 100.78±0.23%

Method was accurate

Robustness

RSD<2

0.41– 0.63

0.40-0.91

Method was robust

Assay%

 

99.80 ±1.20

100.70±1.07

-

 

CONCLUSION

A simple, economic, specific, accurate and precise Stability indicating RP- HPLC methods have been developed and validated for the estimation of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan in solid dosage form. All method validation parameters lie within its acceptance criteria as per ICH Q2(R1) guideline so we can conclude that methods are specific, linear, accurate and precise.

In RP-HPLC method, Linearity was observed in the concentration rang 5-15µg/ml For Dapagliflozin and 20-40µg/ml for Telmisartan with correlation coefficient of 0.999. The proposed method was successfully applied for the simultaneous estimation of both drugs in combined dosage form. The assay value of Dapagliflozin and Telmisartan were found to be 99.80% & 100.70. LOD and LOQ were found to be 2.24 µg/ml and 3.50 µg/ml for Dapagliflozin and 3.25 µg/ml and 4.10 µg/ml for Telmisartan.

Hence, proposed method is well suited for assay of Esmolol Hydrochloride in its semi solid dosage form. it can be easily and conveniently adopted for routine analysis of semi solid dosage form.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Authors have no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Authors are thankful to supplier for providing Materials and Reagents to carry out research work.

REFERENCES

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4·4 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387: 1513–30.
  2. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990– 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388: 1545– 602.
  3. Seuring T, Archangelidi O, Suhrcke M. The economic costs of type 2 diabetes: a global systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics 2015; 33: 811–31.
  4. WHO. Non-communicable diseases country profi le 2014. July, 2014. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profi les-2014/en/ (accessed Oct 6, 2016).
  5. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383–93.Arayne MS, Sultana N, Zuberi MH, Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the analysis of metformin. Pak J Pharm Sci., 2006; 19(3): 231-5.
  6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53.
  7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive lood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53.
  8. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2560–72.
  9. Kumar V, Bharadwaj R, Gupta G and Kumar S, “An Overview on HPLC Method Development, Optimization and Validation process for drug analysis” The Pharma. and Chemi. J. 2015, 2(2), 30
  10. Gupta V, Jain AD, Gill NS and Gupta K, “Development and validation of HPLCmethod - a review” Int. Res. J. of Pharma. and Applied Sci. 2012, 2(4), 17-25.
  11. Sonia K and Nappinnai M, “Development and validation of HPLC and UVvisible spectrophotometric method for the pharmaceutical dosage form and biological fluid –review” European J. of Biomedi. and Pharma. sci. 2016, 3(3),382-391.
  12. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ and Glach JL, “Practical HPLC Method Development”    John Wiley and Sons 1997, 158-192.
  13. Rao G and Goyal A, “An Overview on Analytical Method Development and Validation by Using HPLC” The Pharma. and Chemi. J. 2016, 3(2), 280-289.
  14. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, “Validation of analytical procedure: textand methodology Q2 (R1).” International conference on harmonization IFPMA,Geneva, Switzerland.
  15. Ewing GW. Instrumental method of chemical analysis; 5th Edn; Mc Graw-Hill- Book Company, New York, 1985, pp 1-7.
  16. Kasture AV., Mahadik KR., Wadaodkar SG., and More HN. Instrumental method of  pharmaceutical analysis; 14th Edn; Nirali Prakashan, Pune, 2006, pp 1-30.
  17. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2560–72.
  18. “Dapagliflozin propanediol official”, October 2024, https://online.uspnf.com/documnet/1
  19. “Drug Profile And Information Of Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate”, October 2024,        https://go.drugbank. com/salts/DBSALT001101
  20. Telmisartan", May 2021, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Telmisartan
  21. Government of india, Ministry of Health And Welfare" Published By the Indian Pharmacopia Commission, Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopia 2010, volume-III, 2122-2125.
  22. Patra BR and Gowda N, "Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method For Determination Of Telmisartan In Drug Substance And Marketed Formulation." IJPSR. 2016, 7(5), 2031-2039.
  23. “Drug Profile And Information Of Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate”, October 2024,https://pubchem.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/compound/Dapagliflozin- propanediol
  24. ‘’Dapagliflozin propanediol official”, October 2024, https://online.uspnf.com/documnet/1
  25. Singh Dr. G P, “Draft Proposal for Comments and Inclusion in The Indian Pharmacopoeia, Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate,” Nov 2024, https://www.ipc.gov.in/images/Dapagliflozin_Propanediol_Monohydrate.pdf
  26. A. T.  Hemke  et  al  “RP-HPLC  Method  for  Estimation  of  Dapagliflozin  from  its  Tablet”. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2018,11(01): 242-245.
  27. Gaikwad, Asmita V., et al. "Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin by RP-HPLC." Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results 2022: 4316-4335.
  28. Chaudhari, Ujwal, Jagdish K. Sahu, and Payal R. Dande. "Analytical Method Development, Validation and Forced Degradation Study of Dapagliflozin by RP-HPLC”. Drug Metabolism andBioanalysis Letters Formerly,16.2 2023: 140-152.
  29. Debata, Jitendra, et al. "A New RP-HPLC method development and validation of dapagliflozin inbulk and tablet dosage form." International Journal of Drug Development and Research 9.2 2017:48-51.
  30. Nagwanshi et al. “Stability Indicating Rp-Hplc Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form”. World Journal of Pharmacy and PharmaceuticalSciences, 2022, 10:4 1025-1034.
  31. Sravanthi S, Zarin N, Shruthi B, Ramya KD and Manjeera A, "A New Analytical Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Dapagliflozin by Using Reverse Phase- High Performance Liquid Chromatography." International Journal Of Advanced Research In Medical &Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021, 6(4), 13-20.
  32. Manasa S, Dhanalakshmi K, Reddy GN and Sreenivasa S, "Method development and validationof dapagliflozin in API by RP-HPLC and UV- spectroscopy." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, 2014, 3(6), 250-252.
  33. Parmar KP and Patel ND, "Stability indicating RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Telmisartan and Chlorthalidone in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Technology. 2013, 5(4), 1728-1735.
  34. Patel BD and Chaudhary A, "RP-HPLC Method Development And Validation For Simultaneous Estimation Of Benidipine Hydrochloride, Telmisartan And Chlorthalidone In Tablet." Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 2019, 6(3), 110-124.
  35. Butle SR and Deshpande PB, "Validated Development and Validation of Stability- Indicating HPTLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Telmisartan and Cilnidipine in Combined Tablet Dosage." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Drug Research. 2015, 7(6), 478- 483
  36. Raghu B and Sarma ESRS, "Simple and stability indicating RP-HPLC assay method development and validation of telmisartan in bulk and dosage form." Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2015, 7 (4), 274-280.
  37. Basha SS and Sravanthi P, "Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin by Reversed-Phase High- Performance Liquid Chromatography Method and It's Forced Degradation Studies." Asian Journalof Pharmaceutical Clinical Research, 2017, 10(11), 101-105.
  38. Ashok, P., Narenderan, S. T., Meyyanathan, S. N., Babu, B., & Vadivelan, R. (2019). Development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for estimation of telmisartan in human plasma. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 11(1), 237-40.
  39. Sinha, S. K., Shrivastava, P. K., & Shrivastava, S. K. (2012). Development and validation of a HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of amlodipin and telmisartan in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2(1), S312-S315.
  40. Rao, M. B., Nagendrakumar, A., Sivanadh, M., & Rao, G. V. (2012). Validated RP-HPLC method for the estimation of telmisartan in tablet formulation. Pharmaceutical Research, 2(2), 50-55.
  41. Jawla, S., Jeyalakshmi, K., Krishnamurthy, T., & Kumar, Y. (2010). Development and validation of simultaneous HPLC method for estimation of telmisartan and ramipril in pharmaceutical formulations. PharmTech Research, 2(2), 1625-1633.
  42. Raju, V. B., Gandhi, B. M., Sumanth, K. S., Srinivas, K., & Neeraja, T. N. (2017). RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and ramipril in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 10(2), 179-185.
  43. Verma et al. “Development and Stability Indicating Hplc Method for Dapagliflozin in Api and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form”. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 2017, 33-41.
  44. Nagwanshi S, Aher S and Bachhav R, "Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form." World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021,10(9), 2251- 2262.
  45. Sanagapati M, Dhana lakshmi K, Reddy NG and Kavitha B, "Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin API by UV Spectroscopy”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 2014, 1(27), 270-272.
  46. Kalyan, Sahil, and Amrita Parle. "A validated LC-MS/MS method for determination of dapagliflozin in tablet formulation." IOSR journal of pharmacy ,9 2019: 1-6.
  47. Process for the preparation of Dapagliflozin, US Patent Sanjay Jagdish Desai,US2017/0166547A1.
  48. Sandra Berglez,Rok Grahek, Jernej Grmas, Luka Peternel, Tijana Stanic ,Ljubin,Rok Staric for the Formulations containing amorphous dapagliflozin.Austrelia Patents AU2014295137B2,2014.
  49. Polymorpha of Telmisartan US Patent US6358986B1.
  50. Solid Telmisartan Pharmaceutical Formulation US Patent US8980870B2.

Reference

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4·4 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387: 1513–30.
  2. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990– 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388: 1545– 602.
  3. Seuring T, Archangelidi O, Suhrcke M. The economic costs of type 2 diabetes: a global systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics 2015; 33: 811–31.
  4. WHO. Non-communicable diseases country profi le 2014. July, 2014. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profi les-2014/en/ (accessed Oct 6, 2016).
  5. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383–93.Arayne MS, Sultana N, Zuberi MH, Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the analysis of metformin. Pak J Pharm Sci., 2006; 19(3): 231-5.
  6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53.
  7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive lood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53.
  8. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2560–72.
  9. Kumar V, Bharadwaj R, Gupta G and Kumar S, “An Overview on HPLC Method Development, Optimization and Validation process for drug analysis” The Pharma. and Chemi. J. 2015, 2(2), 30
  10. Gupta V, Jain AD, Gill NS and Gupta K, “Development and validation of HPLCmethod - a review” Int. Res. J. of Pharma. and Applied Sci. 2012, 2(4), 17-25.
  11. Sonia K and Nappinnai M, “Development and validation of HPLC and UVvisible spectrophotometric method for the pharmaceutical dosage form and biological fluid –review” European J. of Biomedi. and Pharma. sci. 2016, 3(3),382-391.
  12. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ and Glach JL, “Practical HPLC Method Development”    John Wiley and Sons 1997, 158-192.
  13. Rao G and Goyal A, “An Overview on Analytical Method Development and Validation by Using HPLC” The Pharma. and Chemi. J. 2016, 3(2), 280-289.
  14. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, “Validation of analytical procedure: textand methodology Q2 (R1).” International conference on harmonization IFPMA,Geneva, Switzerland.
  15. Ewing GW. Instrumental method of chemical analysis; 5th Edn; Mc Graw-Hill- Book Company, New York, 1985, pp 1-7.
  16. Kasture AV., Mahadik KR., Wadaodkar SG., and More HN. Instrumental method of  pharmaceutical analysis; 14th Edn; Nirali Prakashan, Pune, 2006, pp 1-30.
  17. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2560–72.
  18. “Dapagliflozin propanediol official”, October 2024, https://online.uspnf.com/documnet/1
  19. “Drug Profile And Information Of Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate”, October 2024,        https://go.drugbank. com/salts/DBSALT001101
  20. Telmisartan", May 2021, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Telmisartan
  21. Government of india, Ministry of Health And Welfare" Published By the Indian Pharmacopia Commission, Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopia 2010, volume-III, 2122-2125.
  22. Patra BR and Gowda N, "Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method For Determination Of Telmisartan In Drug Substance And Marketed Formulation." IJPSR. 2016, 7(5), 2031-2039.
  23. “Drug Profile And Information Of Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate”, October 2024,https://pubchem.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/compound/Dapagliflozin- propanediol
  24. ‘’Dapagliflozin propanediol official”, October 2024, https://online.uspnf.com/documnet/1
  25. Singh Dr. G P, “Draft Proposal for Comments and Inclusion in The Indian Pharmacopoeia, Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate,” Nov 2024, https://www.ipc.gov.in/images/Dapagliflozin_Propanediol_Monohydrate.pdf
  26. A. T.  Hemke  et  al  “RP-HPLC  Method  for  Estimation  of  Dapagliflozin  from  its  Tablet”. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2018,11(01): 242-245.
  27. Gaikwad, Asmita V., et al. "Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin by RP-HPLC." Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results 2022: 4316-4335.
  28. Chaudhari, Ujwal, Jagdish K. Sahu, and Payal R. Dande. "Analytical Method Development, Validation and Forced Degradation Study of Dapagliflozin by RP-HPLC”. Drug Metabolism andBioanalysis Letters Formerly,16.2 2023: 140-152.
  29. Debata, Jitendra, et al. "A New RP-HPLC method development and validation of dapagliflozin inbulk and tablet dosage form." International Journal of Drug Development and Research 9.2 2017:48-51.
  30. Nagwanshi et al. “Stability Indicating Rp-Hplc Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form”. World Journal of Pharmacy and PharmaceuticalSciences, 2022, 10:4 1025-1034.
  31. Sravanthi S, Zarin N, Shruthi B, Ramya KD and Manjeera A, "A New Analytical Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Dapagliflozin by Using Reverse Phase- High Performance Liquid Chromatography." International Journal Of Advanced Research In Medical &Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021, 6(4), 13-20.
  32. Manasa S, Dhanalakshmi K, Reddy GN and Sreenivasa S, "Method development and validationof dapagliflozin in API by RP-HPLC and UV- spectroscopy." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, 2014, 3(6), 250-252.
  33. Parmar KP and Patel ND, "Stability indicating RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Telmisartan and Chlorthalidone in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Technology. 2013, 5(4), 1728-1735.
  34. Patel BD and Chaudhary A, "RP-HPLC Method Development And Validation For Simultaneous Estimation Of Benidipine Hydrochloride, Telmisartan And Chlorthalidone In Tablet." Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 2019, 6(3), 110-124.
  35. Butle SR and Deshpande PB, "Validated Development and Validation of Stability- Indicating HPTLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Telmisartan and Cilnidipine in Combined Tablet Dosage." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Drug Research. 2015, 7(6), 478- 483
  36. Raghu B and Sarma ESRS, "Simple and stability indicating RP-HPLC assay method development and validation of telmisartan in bulk and dosage form." Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2015, 7 (4), 274-280.
  37. Basha SS and Sravanthi P, "Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin by Reversed-Phase High- Performance Liquid Chromatography Method and It's Forced Degradation Studies." Asian Journalof Pharmaceutical Clinical Research, 2017, 10(11), 101-105.
  38. Ashok, P., Narenderan, S. T., Meyyanathan, S. N., Babu, B., & Vadivelan, R. (2019). Development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for estimation of telmisartan in human plasma. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 11(1), 237-40.
  39. Sinha, S. K., Shrivastava, P. K., & Shrivastava, S. K. (2012). Development and validation of a HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of amlodipin and telmisartan in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2(1), S312-S315.
  40. Rao, M. B., Nagendrakumar, A., Sivanadh, M., & Rao, G. V. (2012). Validated RP-HPLC method for the estimation of telmisartan in tablet formulation. Pharmaceutical Research, 2(2), 50-55.
  41. Jawla, S., Jeyalakshmi, K., Krishnamurthy, T., & Kumar, Y. (2010). Development and validation of simultaneous HPLC method for estimation of telmisartan and ramipril in pharmaceutical formulations. PharmTech Research, 2(2), 1625-1633.
  42. Raju, V. B., Gandhi, B. M., Sumanth, K. S., Srinivas, K., & Neeraja, T. N. (2017). RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and ramipril in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 10(2), 179-185.
  43. Verma et al. “Development and Stability Indicating Hplc Method for Dapagliflozin in Api and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form”. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 2017, 33-41.
  44. Nagwanshi S, Aher S and Bachhav R, "Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form." World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021,10(9), 2251- 2262.
  45. Sanagapati M, Dhana lakshmi K, Reddy NG and Kavitha B, "Method Development and Validation of Dapagliflozin API by UV Spectroscopy”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 2014, 1(27), 270-272.
  46. Kalyan, Sahil, and Amrita Parle. "A validated LC-MS/MS method for determination of dapagliflozin in tablet formulation." IOSR journal of pharmacy ,9 2019: 1-6.
  47. Process for the preparation of Dapagliflozin, US Patent Sanjay Jagdish Desai,US2017/0166547A1.
  48. Sandra Berglez,Rok Grahek, Jernej Grmas, Luka Peternel, Tijana Stanic ,Ljubin,Rok Staric for the Formulations containing amorphous dapagliflozin.Austrelia Patents AU2014295137B2,2014.
  49. Polymorpha of Telmisartan US Patent US6358986B1.
  50. Solid Telmisartan Pharmaceutical Formulation US Patent US8980870B2.

Photo
Brinda Jodhani
Corresponding author

Faculty of pharmacy, noble pharmacy college, noble University junagadh bhesan road via vadal Nr. Bamangam, junagadh - 362310, gujarat, india

Photo
Dhirendra Kumar tarai
Co-author

Faculty of pharmacy, noble pharmacy college, noble University junagadh bhesan road via vadal Nr. Bamangam, junagadh - 362310, gujarat, india

Photo
Khyati Bhupta
Co-author

Faculty of pharmacy, noble pharmacy college, noble University junagadh bhesan road via vadal Nr. Bamangam, junagadh - 362310, gujarat, india

Photo
Dr. Santosh Kirtane
Co-author

Faculty of pharmacy, noble pharmacy college, noble University junagadh bhesan road via vadal Nr. Bamangam, junagadh - 362310, gujarat, india

Brinda Jodhani*, Dhirendra Kumar Tarai, Khyati Bhupta, Dr. Santosh Kirtane, Development And Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate and Telmisartan in Synthetic Mixture, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 6, 1319-1337. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15611286

More related articles
Pharmaceutical Aspects Of Accelerated Stability St...
Ramya Teja Medarametla, K. Venkata Gopaiah, J. N. Suresh Kumar, ....
Antidiabetic Activity And Phytochemical Investigat...
Lahariya B., Dr. S. k. Jain, Dr. R. Irchhaiya, ...
A Review on Liposomal Insitu Gel Formulations for ...
Gagan K. S., S. Swetha Malika Devi, Beny Baby, S Rajarajan, Yalla...
Advancements in Autoimmune Disease Treatment: From Conventional Therapies to Pre...
Yadnyesha Dahake, Rajashree Thakre, Shantanu Rewatkar, Dr. Vaibhav P. Uplanchiwar, Dr. Vinod Thakare...
Development and Validation of HPLC Method for Determination of an API in Presenc...
Shraddha Muneshwar , Sohan Thipe, Amol Sawale, Shailesh Jawarkar , ...
Related Articles
Pharmacognostic Evaluation Of Crude Drugs ...
Rupali Bandgar, Gitanjali Deokar, Shital Darekar, Atish Patil, ...
A Challenging and Traditionally Outcome of a Molecule: An Overview ...
Kuna Akash, Damu Uma Sankar, Dr. Konathala Rajesh, ...
Pharmaceutical Aspects Of Accelerated Stability Studies...
Ramya Teja Medarametla, K. Venkata Gopaiah, J. N. Suresh Kumar, . Lakshmi Pravallika4, P. Mouli, S. ...
More related articles
Pharmaceutical Aspects Of Accelerated Stability Studies...
Ramya Teja Medarametla, K. Venkata Gopaiah, J. N. Suresh Kumar, . Lakshmi Pravallika4, P. Mouli, S. ...
A Review on Liposomal Insitu Gel Formulations for Intranasal Delivery of Antidep...
Gagan K. S., S. Swetha Malika Devi, Beny Baby, S Rajarajan, Yallappa, ...
Pharmaceutical Aspects Of Accelerated Stability Studies...
Ramya Teja Medarametla, K. Venkata Gopaiah, J. N. Suresh Kumar, . Lakshmi Pravallika4, P. Mouli, S. ...
A Review on Liposomal Insitu Gel Formulations for Intranasal Delivery of Antidep...
Gagan K. S., S. Swetha Malika Devi, Beny Baby, S Rajarajan, Yallappa, ...