View Article

Abstract

The Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) is a required, structured, and documented evaluation of pharmaceutical products that occurs over a one-year period. Pharmaceutical manufacturers conduct a systematic Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) of product quality data each year. The primary goal is to assess the quality, safety, and effectiveness of medicinal products at all stages of their development. The system covers production, analytical findings, discrepancies, grievances, refunds, data on stability, and CAPA initiatives to guarantee continuous conformity with Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and worldwide regulatory guidelines. APQR facilitates consistency across products, identifies potential risks, validates processes, and manages quality throughout the product lifecycle. The review conforms to regulatory guidelines like FDA 21 CFR 211.180(e), EU GMP Annex 15, ICH Q7/Q9/Q10, and PIC/S standards, encouraging ongoing improvement and inspection preparedness. This is based on regulatory requirements and standards that govern the manufacture and maintenance of pharmaceutical product quality. The pharmaceutical industry is adopting digital transformation to guarantee improved product quality and regulatory adherence by incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into all quality assessments and characteristics. The integration of artificial intelligence in APQR improves both its efficiency and accuracy. Predictive analytics and anomaly detection will be achieved by utilizing AI and machine learning technologies in the future. This article offers a comprehensive framework for APQR, covering regulatory context, scope, documentation, and implementation strategies within pharmaceutical quality systems.

Keywords

Annual Product Quality Review, AI, cGMP, FDA 21 CFR 211.180(e), Regulatory Compliance, ICH guidelines, lifecycle management, Trend Analysis.

Introduction

The Annual Product Quality Review (APQR), also referred to as the Annual Product Review (APR) or Product Quality Review (PQR), is a yearly systematic assessment of pharmaceutical products. This process ensures that products are consistently produced and managed in line with quality standards, promoting ongoing improvement and adherence to regulations.

Definition of APQR

An Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) is a systematic, documented evaluation conducted annually to assess the quality of a pharmaceutical product over its lifecycle. It encompasses manufacturing, control, complaints, stability, and deviation data to ensure that the product consistently meets its predefined quality specifications.

Objectives

The primary objectives of the APQR are as follows:

  • Verifying the consistency of existing manufacturing processes is also important.
  • Assessing the appropriateness of the current specifications for both starting materials and finished products.
  • Identifying trends in product quality and process performance.
  • Determining the need for changes in specifications, manufacturing processes, or control procedures.
  • Evaluating the impact of any changes made since the last review was conducted.

Importance in the Pharmaceutical Industry

  • Demonstrating Process Capability & Consistency
    APQR helps verify that manufacturing processes consistently produce products within specifications. This continuous monitoring maintains batch-to-batch uniformity, reinforcing product reliability and reducing variability.
  • Identifying Trends & Risks
    By analyzing yearly trends—such as deviations, stability shifts, and complaint patterns—APQR facilitates early detection of quality risks. Such proactive trend identification supports corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) before problems escalate.
  • Driving Lifecycle Quality Management
    APQR acts as a cornerstone of the Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS), embedding continuous quality oversight and enabling lifecycle management—including validation reassessment, specification changes, and process optimization.
  • Supporting Operational Efficiency & Cost Reduction
    Through early identification of potential failures, APQR minimizes the need for OOS investigations or batch rework. This improves overall manufacturing efficiency and reduces downtime or waste.
    • Ensuring Process Consistency: APQR verifies that manufacturing processes remain robust and consistently produce compliant products, minimizing variability and ensuring reliability
    • Proactive Risk Detection: By analyzing   trends —such as deviations, out-of-specification results, and stability shifts—APQR identifies potential quality issues early, facilitating timely corrective and preventive actions (CAPA).
  • Lifecycle Quality Management: APQR is a fundamental element of the Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS), enabling support for ongoing process validation, specification adjustments, and continuous improvement strategies.

Regulatory Context

  • US FDA (21 CFR 211.180(e))
    The FDA mandates an annual review of manufacturing and control data for each marketed drug, including batches, QC results, deviations, complaints, returns, and recalls. The review must assess the necessity for changes in specifications or processes
  • FDA (21?CFR?211.180(e)): Requires drug manufacturers to perform annual reviews of production and control records to determine if changes to specifications or manufacturing controls are necessary.
  • EU GMP (EudraLex Volume 4, Annex 1 & 15)
    EU regulations require a comprehensive product quality review to ensure ongoing compliance, with special emphasis on stability, batch data, change control, and complaint trends
  • EU GMP (Annex 15):  Mandates periodic product quality reviews—including batch data, stability results, and deviations—to confirm ongoing compliance and process capability.
  • ICH Guidelines (Q7, Q9, Q10)
    While not APQR-specific, ICH guidelines reinforce the importance of risk-based quality systems, continuous improvement, and process understanding—principles that underpin effective APQR implementation

Scope of APQR

APQR covers all manufactured products and activities over the year:

  1. Batch Manufacturing Data
    1. Review of all finished and intermediate batches, including yields, deviations, reworks, rejects, and CAPA.
  2. Analytical Data Review
    1. Evaluation of all QC test results, OOS/OOT investigations, and re-analysis outcomes.
  3. Raw Material & Packaging Components
    1. Checks on incoming materials, supplier performance, quality of materials, and changes undertake.
  4. Stability & Retention Data
    1. Analysis of stability trends per ICH Q1A and retention batch performance to ensure shelf-life compliance.
  5. Complaints, Returns & Recalls
    1. Review of customer feedback, product returns, recall events and corrective actions taken.
  6. Change Control & Process Revalidation
    1. Assessment of changes across manufacturing, equipment, specifications, and validation status.
  7. CAPA and QMS Evaluation
    1. Review of CAPA effectiveness and overall performance of the quality system, aligned with ICH Q10 elements.
  8. Outsourced Activities & Technical Agreements
    1. According to technical agreements, data from third-party manufacturing or testing is included.
  9. Summary & Action Plan
    1. Concluding report with identified issues, improvement opportunities, actions, and responsibilities.

Key Components of APQR

  • Batch Manufacturing Records (BMR): Review of all manufactured batches, including deviations and non-conformities.
  • Out-of-Specification (OOS) and Out-of-Trend (OOT) Results: Analysis of any OOS and OOT results to identify potential quality issues.
  • Market Complaints, Returns, and Recalls: Evaluation of customer complaints, product returns, and recall incidents to identify recurring issues and implement corrective actions.
  • Quality Management System (QMS) and Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA): Assessment of the effectiveness of the QMS and implementation of CAPA to address identified issues.
  • Raw Material and Packaging Documentation: Review of starting materials and packaging components, including supplier qualifications and material specifications.
  • Stability Studies: Analysis of stability data to ensure that products maintain their intended quality over time.

Guidelines for Conducting APQR

  • Data Collection: A broad range of comprehensive data was collected on manufacturing processes, quality control outcomes, inconsistencies, customer complaints, and stability research.
  • Trend analysis: Statistical analyses are used to detect trends in product quality and process performance through trend analysis.
  • Review and Evaluation: The collected data are reviewed to establish whether changes are required to processes, specifications, or control procedures.
  • Documentation: Prepare a comprehensive APQR report, featuring the research results, final conclusions, and proposals for enhancing performance.
  • Approval and Implementation: Obtain the required approvals for the APQR report and put its suggested modifications into effect.

ICH Guidelines and Stability Studies

The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) provides guidelines for stability testing.

  • ICH Q1A(R2): Outlines the stability testing requirements for new drug substances and products.
  • ICH Q1B: Provides guidelines for photostability testing of APIs and excipients.
  • ICH Q1C: Addresses stability testing for new dosage forms.

 These guidelines ensure that stability studies are conducted under standardized conditions to assess the shelf life and storage conditions of pharmaceutical products.

APQR 4:0: THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) EVOLUTION

The pharmaceutical industry is embracing digital transformation to ensure better product quality and regulatory compliance. One such area undergoing a paradigm shift is the Annual Product Quality Review (APQR). Traditionally a manual, time-consuming process, APQR involves compiling and evaluating product quality data over a given period. With the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the APQR process is evolving to become more predictive, data-driven, and real-time. AI enables smarter data aggregation, early anomaly detection, and continuous improvement strategies, aligning with the industry's move toward Pharma 4.0.

AI Integration in APQR: Key Emerging Trends

   2.1 Automated Data Collection and Processing AI technologies simplify the data-heavy APQR process by automating the collection, classification, and normalization of data from disparate sources, such as BMRs, BPRs, QC labs, and ERP systems.

  • It reduces manual errors and data redundancy.
  • Saves time by automating data input and formatting.
  • Facilitates real-time dashboard creation for batch and trend analyses.

2.2 Predictive Quality and Process Analytics Machine Learning (ML) models use historical data to identify trends and forecast potential quality deviations, helping manufacturers to act before a non-compliance event occurs.

  • Forecasts Out-of-Specification (OOS) and out-of-trend (OOT)
  • It enables the predictive maintenance of equipment.
  • Supports proactive CAPA planning.

2.3 Enhanced Root Cause Analysis (RCA) AI-driven RCA tools use Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze deviations, complaints, and audit reports, identifying underlying issues faster and more accurately.

  • Assists in the automated RCA report generation.
  • It learns from historical CAPAs and suggests optimized solutions.
  • It reduces human bias and accelerates decision-making.

2.4 Continuous Process Verification (CPV) AI supports ongoing trend analysis and process verification by continuously monitoring data and comparing them with control limits.

  • It enables a faster response to process deviations.
  • Facilitates lifecycle process validation in accordance with ICH Q8/Q10.
  • Enhances control over Critical Process Parameters (CPPs)

2.5 Integration with Real-Time Data Systems AI integrated with IoT and cloud technologies allows real-time data capture from the shop floor and laboratory equipment.

  • Enables Real-Time Release Testing (RTRT).
  • Flags quality risks during production, not after production.
  • It improves traceability and audit readiness.

2.6    Decision Support Systems

  • AI-based dashboards and visualization tools support quality and regulatory teams in making data-driven decisions.
  • Generates risk-based quality insights that align with Quality by Design (QbD) and ICH for Harmonization Q12 principles.
  1. Benefits of AI-Driven APQR Systems
  • The efficiency and accuracy of compiling and analyzing product data were improved.
  • Early detection of trends that could compromise product quality or compliance.
  • Data-driven decision-making and better root cause identification.
  • Reduction in manual workload and human errors.
  • Enhanced regulatory compliance through traceable and validated digital records is also a benefit.
  1. Regulatory Acceptance and Industry Adoption
  • Regulatory agencies such as the US FDA and EMA are encouraging the use of AI in pharmaceutical quality systems.
  • The ICH guidelines (Q8–Q12) support data-based continuous improvement.
  • The growing concept of "digital maturity" in GMP facilities supports the automation of APQR.
  1. Challenges in AI Adoption for APQR
  • Problems with data integrity and standardization need to be resolved.
  • Inadequate regulatory frameworks for AI-specific APQR processes.
  • The costs and training prerequisites for implementing AI.
  • Integration issues with legacy systems.

Flowchart: Integration of AI into the APQR Process

  1. Future Trends in APQR Implementation

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) into APQR processes is an emerging trend:

  • Predictive Analytics: AI and ML can analyze historical data to predict potential quality issues, enabling proactive measures.
  • Process Optimization: ML algorithms can identify optimal process parameters, reducing variability and enhancing product quality.
  • Anomaly Detection: AI systems can detect anomalies in real-time, facilitating immediate corrective actions.
  • Data Management: Advanced analytics can streamline data collection and analysis, improving the efficiency of APQR processes.
  1. AI & ML Tools to Enhance APQR Efficiency

Tool / Platform

Purpose / Application in APQR

Key Features

KNIME

Data integration, ETL & analytics

Drag-and-drop ML workflows; integrates data from LIMS, ERP, QMS

RapidMiner

Predictive analytics

Forecasts batch deviations, OOS/OOT trends, equipment failures

H2O.ai

AutoML and deep learning models

Automated model creation, anomaly detection, data-driven decisions

TensorFlow

Custom ML algorithms for quality data analysis

Neural networks for subtle batch and trend variation detection

Power BI (with AI Visuals)

Interactive dashboards and visualizations

Real-time APQR KPIs, CAPA tracking, deviation trend reporting

Tableau (GPT integrations)

Automated reporting and AI-driven insights

NLP-based summarization of deviations, complaints, BMR data

Microsoft Azure ML

End-to-end ML lifecycle management

Model training, deployment, and monitoring for trend analysis

Google Cloud AutoML

NLP & image analysis of scanned reports

Analyzes scanned BMRs, OOS records using AI vision and NLP

AWS SageMaker

Full ML lifecycle + document analytics

Integrates manufacturing + quality data for APQR predictions

DataRobot

Enterprise AutoML

Quick, transparent models for deviation prediction and process drift

Alteryx

Data preparation and analytics

Consolidates APQR-relevant data across multiple platforms

Inphinity

Pharma-focused analytics for Qlik users

Root cause analysis of deviations, interactive trend dashboards

Seeq

Time-series analytics for process data

Monitors CPP/CQA trends across batches in real time

spaCy / GPT APIs

NLP engines for textual data processing

Summarizes CAPA, complaints, and batch record narratives using AI

PharmaMV

Real-time process monitoring in pharma

Enables PAT, advanced trend detection, and real-time deviation alerts

Talend AI Data Fabric

Unified data integration

Synchronizes data from SAP, LIMS, QMS for complete APQR review pipeline

Future Outlook

In the coming years, the role of AI in APQR will expand from passive support to active decision-making tools, guiding batch release, product recalls, and CAPA actions in real time. Regulatory frameworks are gradually evolving to recognize and validate AI-driven quality reviews.

  • AI will become a standard tool for APQR and broader Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (PQS).
  • Cloud-based AI platforms will offer scalable and collaborative APQR tools.

Role of cGMP in APQR

The foundational framework of Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) ensures pharmaceutical products are produced and controlled consistently to meet quality standards, which is a principle directly underpinning the APQR process. cGMP requires stringent documentation, comprehensive personnel training, carefully managed environments, certified equipment, and robust procedures to prevent contamination, mistakes, or variability in products.

Within a cGMP framework, APQR functions as a key compliance verification point where it brings together GMP-related records, including batch production, deviations, quality control measures, customer complaints, product recalls, and CAPA actions, and assesses them on an annual basis to validate process reliability and efficiency. Organizations not only meet compliance with regulations such as FDA 21 CFR 211.180(e) by aligning APQR with cGMP requirements, but also promote a culture of ongoing improvement and risk minimization throughout their quality management systems.

Summary Table

Need

Scope

Regulatory compliance

All batch production & GMP records

Product consistency & quality

QC results, OOS/OOT & stability trends

Trend analysis & risk detection

Raw materials, packaging, complaints, recalls

Continuous improvement

CAPA, change control, process revalidation

Lifecycle quality management

Stability, retention, revalidation, technical agreements

Stakeholder trust & audit readiness

Summary reporting with documented actions

Regulatory frameworks (like FDA’s AI/ML-based Software as Medical Device guidance) are evolving to embrace AI in quality and compliance.

Regulatory Aspects

21?CFR?211 – U.S. FDA cGMP Requirements

The Code of Federal Regulations Title?21 Part?211 outlines Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) for finished pharmaceuticals. Among these, §?211.180 – General Requirements is directly linked to APQR:

  • §?211.180(e) mandates maintaining “written records… so that data therein can be used for evaluating, at least annually, the quality standards of each drug product to determine the need for changes in drug product specifications or manufacturing or control procedures.” The rule explicitly calls for the review of:
  1. A representative number of batches (approved or rejected).
  2. Complaints, recalls, returned or salvaged drug products, and related investigations 
  • Additional Requirements (§?211.180(a–d), (f)):
  1. Production, control, and distribution records must be retained for at least one year after batch expiration (or three years for certain OTC drugs).
  2. Records must be readily available for FDA inspection, with procedures to notify responsible officials of investigations, recalls, or FDA actions.

Practical Implications for APQR

  • Annual Review Structure: Companies are required to establish formal, written protocols for conducting annual reviews, encompassing aspects such as batch performance, customer complaints, product recalls, deviations, and other relevant factors, and adhere to these procedures strictly.
  • Inspection Readiness: As per FDA documentation, lack of a comprehensive annual review is frequently cited in 483 forms, with inspectors noting missing reviews of stability, controls, CAPA, or training system.
  • Integration with Quality Systems: Guidance such as "Quality Systems Approach to CGMP" aligns §?211.180 with broader CGMP expectations—emphasizing trend analysisrisk reduction, and continuous monitoring.

Summary Table

Regulation

Key APQR Implication

§?211.180

(e)

Mandates annual quality review of batches, complaints, recalls

§?211.180

(a–d)

Requires record retention (1–3 years) & inspection readiness

§?211.180

(f)

Requires notification of QA leadership about investigations and recalls

Regulation

Key APQR Implication

FDA Guidance

Emphasizes written procedures, trend analysis, and documented compliance

By thoroughly adhering to 21?CFR?211, particularly §?211.180, a robust APQR process not only ensures regulatory compliance but also drives continuous quality improvementrisk management, and inspection preparedness.

Next Steps:

  • Use a cross-functional team and data analytics for structured review.
  • Ensure the report includes clear action plans and is approved by QA/Management

CONCLUSION

The Annual Product Quality Review is a vital part of pharmaceutical quality control, guaranteeing that products conform to predetermined quality benchmarks and regulatory specifications. APQR facilitates continuous improvement and risk mitigation by systematically evaluating manufacturing processes, quality control data, and stability studies. The integration of AI and machine learning technologies is expected to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of APQR, thereby facilitating a more proactive and data-driven approach to quality management within the pharmaceutical sector. APQR is a strategic, regulatory-compliant tool that ensures pharmaceutical product quality through a rigorous annual review process. The system ensures compliance with FDA 21 CFR 211.180(e), EU GMP Annex 15, and ICH Q7, Q9, and Q10. The integration of trend analysis, CAPA, and lifecycle management, combined with AI/ML tools, enables APQR to boost process reliability, reduce risk, and foster ongoing improvement, thereby strengthening its relationship with regulatory bodies and other stakeholders.

REFERENCES

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 211.180 –General requirements. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-211
  2. European Medicines Agency. EudraLex Volume 4, Annex 15: Qualification and Validation [Internet]. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu
  3. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  4. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  5. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  6. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  7. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q1B: Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  8. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q1C: Stability Testing for New Dosage Forms. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  9. PharmaGuideline. Annual Product Quality Review (APQR): An Overview. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmaguideline.com
  10. ValGenesis. APQR: A Key Pillar of Pharma Quality Management. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.valgenesis.com
  11. Scilife. What is an Annual Product Quality Review? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.scilife.io
  12. GMPInsiders. APQR Regulatory Requirements Explained. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gmpinsiders.com
  13. Apicule. Everything You Need to Know About APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.apicule.com
  14. PharmaGuideHub. APQR Process Flow and Template. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmaguidehub.com
  15. PharmaTips. ICH and APQR Implementation in GMP Systems. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharma.tips
  16. PharmaBeginers. How to Conduct APQR Step by Step. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmabeginers.com
  17. Journal of Global Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences (JGTPS). APQR regulatory and statistical considerations. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.jgtps.com
  18. Quality eLeap Software. Role of QMS in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://quality.eleapsoftware.com
  19. Wikipedia. Pharmaceutical Quality System. [Internet]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmaceutical_quality_system
  20. QbD Group. Role of Quality by Design in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.qbdgroup.com
  21. NDGCS. Handling Third-party Activities in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ndgcs.com
  22. PharmabossBD. Evaluation of OOS, OOT & QC Data in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmabossbd.com
  23. Pharmainterview. Role of GMP in Pharmaceutical Industry. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmainterview.com
  24. Reddit. Role of cGMP in Quality Systems. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.reddit.com/r/pharmacy
  25. AmpleLogic. Automating APQR through AI/ML and LIMS. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.amplelogic.com
  26. Makwana D, Patel H, Raval N, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2021;11(1):208–214.
  27. Bhutani H, Pathak D, Dureja H. Integration of AI in Pharmaceutical Quality Systems: A Future Perspective. Int J Pharm Sci .Res. 2022;13(3):1045–1052.
  28. Kalra A, Saini A. Role of Natural Language Processing in Pharma AI Systems. PharmaTech Medica. 2023;10(2):55–61.
  29. FDA. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. Draft Guidance. USFDA. 2021.
  30. EMA. Reflection paper on use of AI in the lifecycle of medicinal products. European Medicines Agency. 2023.

Reference

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 211.180 –General requirements. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-211
  2. European Medicines Agency. EudraLex Volume 4, Annex 15: Qualification and Validation [Internet]. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu
  3. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  4. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  5. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  6. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  7. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q1B: Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  8. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q1C: Stability Testing for New Dosage Forms. [Internet]. Available from: https://database.ich.org
  9. PharmaGuideline. Annual Product Quality Review (APQR): An Overview. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmaguideline.com
  10. ValGenesis. APQR: A Key Pillar of Pharma Quality Management. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.valgenesis.com
  11. Scilife. What is an Annual Product Quality Review? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.scilife.io
  12. GMPInsiders. APQR Regulatory Requirements Explained. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gmpinsiders.com
  13. Apicule. Everything You Need to Know About APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.apicule.com
  14. PharmaGuideHub. APQR Process Flow and Template. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmaguidehub.com
  15. PharmaTips. ICH and APQR Implementation in GMP Systems. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharma.tips
  16. PharmaBeginers. How to Conduct APQR Step by Step. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmabeginers.com
  17. Journal of Global Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences (JGTPS). APQR regulatory and statistical considerations. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.jgtps.com
  18. Quality eLeap Software. Role of QMS in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://quality.eleapsoftware.com
  19. Wikipedia. Pharmaceutical Quality System. [Internet]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmaceutical_quality_system
  20. QbD Group. Role of Quality by Design in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.qbdgroup.com
  21. NDGCS. Handling Third-party Activities in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ndgcs.com
  22. PharmabossBD. Evaluation of OOS, OOT & QC Data in APQR. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmabossbd.com
  23. Pharmainterview. Role of GMP in Pharmaceutical Industry. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pharmainterview.com
  24. Reddit. Role of cGMP in Quality Systems. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.reddit.com/r/pharmacy
  25. AmpleLogic. Automating APQR through AI/ML and LIMS. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.amplelogic.com
  26. Makwana D, Patel H, Raval N, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2021;11(1):208–214.
  27. Bhutani H, Pathak D, Dureja H. Integration of AI in Pharmaceutical Quality Systems: A Future Perspective. Int J Pharm Sci .Res. 2022;13(3):1045–1052.
  28. Kalra A, Saini A. Role of Natural Language Processing in Pharma AI Systems. PharmaTech Medica. 2023;10(2):55–61.
  29. FDA. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. Draft Guidance. USFDA. 2021.
  30. EMA. Reflection paper on use of AI in the lifecycle of medicinal products. European Medicines Agency. 2023.

Photo
Nimita Manocha
Corresponding author

Department of Quality Assurance, Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Pithampur Road, Opposite to IIM, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India 453331

Photo
Aditi Chouksey
Co-author

Department of Quality Assurance, Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Pithampur Road, Opposite to IIM, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India 453331

Photo
Ritesh Patel
Co-author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Pithampur Road, Opposite to IIM, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India 453331

Photo
Gurmeet Chhabra
Co-author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Pithampur Road, Opposite to IIM, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India 453331

Photo
Gyanendra Singh Patel
Co-author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Pithampur Road, Opposite to IIM, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India 453331

Aditi Chouksey, Nimita Manocha, Ritesh Patel, Gurmeet Chhabra, Gyanendra Singh Patel, Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Annual Product Quality Review: A New Era in Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 7, 3176-3186. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16357019

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Gel for Denta...
Virendra Rajendrasing Pardeshi, Bhavesh Shahanu Patil, Bhavesh Su...
Preparation And Characterization of Microencapsula...
Pal Pawan Chandrashekhar, Mrityunjay Kumar, Yasir Akhbar Dar, Fai...
Innovative Therapeutic Approaches and Emerging Tar...
Rahul Gangurde, C. L. Sindhura, Esther Swapnil Chopade, Sayali Po...
Formulation And Evaluation of Topical Microemulsion of Smilax China...
Ashutosh Lakhera, Meenakshi Kandwal, Shivanand Patil, ...
An Overview of Curcumin Loaded Niosomal Gel for Anti-Inflammatory Effect ...
Awale Sainath , Dr. Wajid Chaus, Ghalge Mahesh, Kodgire Nikita, Patel Sujan, ...
Related Articles
Niosomes As A Potential Approach For Enhancing Topical Application...
Priyadarshini K, E Gopinath, Ganesh N. S., Vineeth Chandy, ...
A Review on Phytochemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities Of Brassic...
Harshithkumar K. N., Pooja D., Prasanna B. P., Nayana H. K., ...
An Interventional Study To Assess Knowledge On Insulin Self Administration Among...
Yashaswini Borkar, Ramakrishna Shabaraya A., Suchetha Kumari, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Liposomes: As A Novel Drug Delivery System...
Aarti Nimse , Dr. Sachin Kale , Rutuja Giram , Ashvini Kakad, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Gel for Dental Caries...
Virendra Rajendrasing Pardeshi, Bhavesh Shahanu Patil, Bhavesh Suresh Patil, Bhumika Dilip Patil, Ga...
More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Gel for Dental Caries...
Virendra Rajendrasing Pardeshi, Bhavesh Shahanu Patil, Bhavesh Suresh Patil, Bhumika Dilip Patil, Ga...
Preparation And Characterization of Microencapsulating Drug Delivery Systems of ...
Pal Pawan Chandrashekhar, Mrityunjay Kumar, Yasir Akhbar Dar, Faizan Jeelani Shergojri, Nauneet Kuma...
Innovative Therapeutic Approaches and Emerging Targets to Combat Drug Resistance...
Rahul Gangurde, C. L. Sindhura, Esther Swapnil Chopade, Sayali Power, Swapnil Chopade, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Gel for Dental Caries...
Virendra Rajendrasing Pardeshi, Bhavesh Shahanu Patil, Bhavesh Suresh Patil, Bhumika Dilip Patil, Ga...
Preparation And Characterization of Microencapsulating Drug Delivery Systems of ...
Pal Pawan Chandrashekhar, Mrityunjay Kumar, Yasir Akhbar Dar, Faizan Jeelani Shergojri, Nauneet Kuma...
Innovative Therapeutic Approaches and Emerging Targets to Combat Drug Resistance...
Rahul Gangurde, C. L. Sindhura, Esther Swapnil Chopade, Sayali Power, Swapnil Chopade, ...