View Article

Abstract

This work was undertaken to design and assess a gastroretentive floating drug delivery system (GRDDS) for Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT? receptor blocker widely employed in controlling nausea and vomiting. Since Ondansetron exhibits a short elimination half-life and moderate oral bioavailability, the formulation aimed to extend its gastric residence and provide sustained release. Floating tablets were formulated by wet granulation, incorporating sodium bicarbonate and citric acid as effervescent agents, along with polymers such as HPMC K4M, Ethyl Cellulose, Eudragit RL-100, and Hydroxypropyl Cellulose (HPC). Seven trial formulations (F1–F7) were prepared and evaluated for pre- and post-compression properties including hardness, friability, swelling index, drug content, buoyancy duration, and in vitro release profile. Among these, F7 containing HPMC K4M and HPC showed superior floating behavior (>12 h), sustained drug release, and favorable physical characteristics. The findings highlight the potential of floating systems to enhance Ondansetron’s therapeutic efficiency and improve patient compliance.

Keywords

Ondansetron, floating drug delivery, gastroretentive system, sustained release, HPMC K4M, Hydroxypropyl Cellulose, Eudragit RL-100, Ethyl Cellulose, buoyancy, swelling index, wet granulation.

Introduction

Oral administration is the most widely accepted route for delivering therapeutic agents because of its simplicity, non-invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Despite these advantages, a key limitation of this route lies in the relatively short gastric residence time of conventional dosage forms, which may hinder the absorption and overall bioavailability of drugs that are absorbed primarily in the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT). To overcome this drawback, Gastroretentive Drug Delivery Systems (GRDDS) have been developed as an advanced strategy in controlled drug delivery. These systems are designed to extend the retention of dosage forms within the stomach, thereby improving drug absorption, reducing dosing frequency, and enhancing therapeutic efficacy.

Among the different approaches to gastroretention, Floating Drug Delivery Systems (FDDS) are considered highly effective. By maintaining a bulk density lower than that of gastric fluids, FDDS remain buoyant in the stomach for prolonged periods, allowing sustained and site-specific drug release. The success of such systems depends on both physiological parameters (such as gastric motility, pH variation, and fed/fasted state) and formulation factors (such as polymer type, dosage form size, and excipient selection). FDDS are particularly advantageous for drugs that degrade in the intestinal environment, exhibit poor solubility at alkaline pH, or are intended for localized stomach action.

In this context, the present study focuses on the formulation and evaluation of a floating gastroretentive system for Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT? receptor antagonist commonly prescribed for the management of nausea and vomiting. By incorporating a floating mechanism, the system aims to increase gastric residence, provide controlled release, and ultimately improve the therapeutic performance and patient compliance associated with Ondansetron therapy.

These systems are especially advantageous for drugs that are absorbed mainly in the stomach or the upper small intestine, as well as those that undergo degradation in the alkaline environment of the distal intestine. Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT? receptor antagonist, is frequently prescribed for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical procedures. Although highly effective, its clinical utility is restricted by a short elimination half-life of about 3–4 hours and moderate oral bioavailability of nearly 60%. To overcome these drawbacks, designing a gastroretentive floating drug delivery system (FDDS) offers a promising strategy to extend gastric residence, provide controlled release, and enhance drug absorption. The present work is directed towards the formulation and evaluation of a floating system for Ondansetron, with the goal of improving its pharmacokinetic behavior, sustaining gastric retention, and ultimately enhancing both therapeutic effectiveness and patient adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Ondansetron was obtained from Zeel Pharma (Mumbai, India). Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC K4M), Eudragit RL-100, and Hydroxypropyl Cellulose (HPC) were procured from Colorcon Pvt. Ltd. (Goa, India). Ethyl Cellulose, Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC), Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), Sodium Bicarbonate, Citric Acid, Isopropyl Alcohol, Magnesium Stearate, and Lactose were supplied by SD Fines (Mumbai, India). All reagents and excipients used were of analytical or pharmaceutical grade.

Preparation of Floating Tablets

Floating tablets of Ondansetron (250 mg per tablet) were prepared using the wet granulation method. Sodium bicarbonate and citric acid were incorporated as effervescent agents to generate buoyancy, while different polymers were employed in varying ratios to achieve controlled release (Table 6.3).

Method of Granule Preparation

  1. Ondansetron and selected hydrophilic polymers were sieved through mesh #40 and blended for 10 minutes.
  2. The gas-generating agents (sodium bicarbonate and citric acid) were sieved through mesh #60 and added to the mixture.
  3. A binding solution of PVP in isopropyl alcohol was prepared separately.
  4. The powder blend was granulated using the binding solution.
  5. The resulting wet mass was dried at room temperature and passed through mesh #40.
  6. Magnesium stearate was sieved through mesh #60 and incorporated into the dried granules.
  7. The granules were blended thoroughly for 15 minutes to ensure uniform distribution of excipients.
  8. Finally, the granules were compressed into tablets using a single-punch tablet compression machine.

Table 1.1: Composition of different Ondansetron floating tablet formulations

Ingredients (mg/tablet)

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

Ondansetron

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

HPMC K4M

3

2

2

2

Ethyl Cellulose

3

3

Eudragit RL-100

6

3

Hydroxypropyl Cellulose (HPC)

6

3

Sodium Bicarbonate

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Citric Acid

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Magnesium Stearate

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Lactose

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Total Weight (mg)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

RESULTS

Preformulation Studies

Characterization of Ondansetron

A. Organoleptic Properties

Ondansetron was observed as a crystalline powder with a color ranging from off-white to pale yellow. It exhibited a characteristic odor and a distinctly bitter taste.

B. Melting Point

The melting point of Ondansetron was determined to be within the range of 218–225 °C, which is consistent with reported literature values, confirming its identity and purity.

C. FTIR Spectroscopy

Figure 1.2: FTIR Spectrum of Ondansetron generate graph

D. UV spectroscopy (Determination of amax)

Figure 1.3: UV spectrum of Ondansetron.

Evaluation of Granules

The prepared granules of different formulations (F1–F7) were evaluated for bulk density, tapped density, Carr’s compressibility index, Hausner’s ratio, and angle of repose. The results are summarized in Table 1.2.

Table 1.2: Physicochemical evaluation of granules

Formulation Code

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Tapped Density (g/cc)

Carr’s Index

Hausner’s Ratio

Angle of Repose (°)

F1

0.211

0.380

0.444

1.800

35.68

F2

0.221

0.387

0.428

1.751

42.30

F3

0.214

0.378

0.433

1.766

35.68

F4

0.229

0.370

0.381

1.615

35.68

F5

0.220

0.367

0.400

1.668

41.34

F6

0.218

0.390

0.441

1.788

35.68

F7

0.221

0.385

0.462

1.859

40.69

Evaluation of Tablets

A. Tablet Thickness and Size
The thickness and diameter of tablets from different formulations were measured to ensure uniformity. Results are presented in Table 1.3.

Table 1.3: Thickness and diameter of tablets

Formulation Code

Thickness (mm)

Diameter (mm)

F1

5.0

10.5

F2

5.2

11.2

F3

5.2

9.5

F4

5.3

11.5

F5

5.4

10.9

F6

5.4

11.2

F7

5.3

11.5

B. Hardness, Friability, and Average Weight
The tablets were tested for mechanical strength, friability, and uniformity of weight. The results are summarized in Table 1.4.

Table 1.4: Hardness, friability, and average weight of tablets

Formulation Code

Hardness (kg/cm²)

Friability (%)

Average Weight (mg)

F1

3.8

0.21

482

F2

4.2

0.43

497

F3

3.6

0.28

500

F4

4.3

0.30

489

F5

3.8

0.47

493

F6

4.6

0.49

490

F7

4.3

0.51

487

C. Drug Content

Drug content uniformity was determined for each formulation, and the assay values are presented in Table 1.5.

Table 1.5: Percentage drug content of Ondansetron tablets

Formulation Code

Drug Content (%)

F1

94.16

F2

99.23

F3

100.86

F4

98.27

F5

96.80

F6

95.26

F7

99.86

CONCLUSION

The present research focused on the formulation and evaluation of effervescent-based floating tablets of Ondansetron prepared with different polymers, namely HPMC K4M, Ethyl cellulose, Eudragit RL 100, and HPC, either individually or in combination. The study demonstrated that drug release is strongly influenced by the swelling behavior, molecular weight, and diffusion properties of the selected polymers.

Among the developed formulations, tablets containing HPMC K4M and HPC (F1 and F4) exhibited better release patterns due to their effective swelling capacity when used individually. In contrast, formulation F6 (HPMC K4M with Eudragit RL 100) showed reduced drug release compared to F1, attributed to the altered swelling behavior when polymers were combined. All the prepared tablets fulfilled essential physicochemical parameters such as hardness, friability, weight variation, drug content, swelling index, and floating ability, with floating time extending up to 12 hours.

Overall, formulation F7 (HPMC K4M with HPC) emerged as the most optimized batch, offering a controlled and sustained drug release profile. Therefore, the objective of developing a gastro-retentive floating dosage form of Ondansetron using different polymer ratios and combinations was successfully achieved.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to sincerely acknowledge the Department of Pharmaceutics for extending the essential facilities and constant support throughout the course of this research work. We are grateful to Zeel Pharma, Mumbai, and Colorcon Pvt. Ltd., Goa, for their kind provision of the drug and excipients used in this study. We also extend our heartfelt thanks to our faculty members and fellow colleagues for their valuable guidance, encouragement, and cooperation during the completion of this work.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this research work.

REFERENCES

  1. Chawla G., Gupta P., Bansal A.K. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems. In: Jain N.K. (Ed.), Progress in Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery Systems. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distributors; 2004. p. 76–97.
  2. Kawashima Y., Takeuchi H., Yamamoto H. Gastrointestinal retentive microparticulate systems for improving oral drug delivery. In: Wise D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Pharmaceutical Controlled Release Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 2000. p. 505–525.
  3. Arora S., Ali J., Ahuja A., Khar R.K., Baboota S. Floating drug delivery systems: A comprehensive review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6(3):E372–E390.
  4. Chatterjee C.C. Human Physiology. 11th ed. Kolkata: Medical Allied Agency; 2001. p. 435–436.
  5. Deshpande A.A., Shah N.H., Rhodes C.T., Malick W. Development of a novel controlled-release system for gastric retention. Pharmaceutical Research. 1997;14(6):815–819.
  6. Vyas S.P., Khar R.K. Controlled Drug Delivery: Concepts and Advances. 1st ed. New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2000. p. 54, 155, 196.
  7. Tortora G.J., Grabowski S.R. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. 10th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. p. 1861.
  8. Garg S., Sharma S. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems. Business Briefing: Pharmatech. 2005;67:265–272.

Reference

  1. Chawla G., Gupta P., Bansal A.K. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems. In: Jain N.K. (Ed.), Progress in Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery Systems. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distributors; 2004. p. 76–97.
  2. Kawashima Y., Takeuchi H., Yamamoto H. Gastrointestinal retentive microparticulate systems for improving oral drug delivery. In: Wise D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Pharmaceutical Controlled Release Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 2000. p. 505–525.
  3. Arora S., Ali J., Ahuja A., Khar R.K., Baboota S. Floating drug delivery systems: A comprehensive review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6(3):E372–E390.
  4. Chatterjee C.C. Human Physiology. 11th ed. Kolkata: Medical Allied Agency; 2001. p. 435–436.
  5. Deshpande A.A., Shah N.H., Rhodes C.T., Malick W. Development of a novel controlled-release system for gastric retention. Pharmaceutical Research. 1997;14(6):815–819.
  6. Vyas S.P., Khar R.K. Controlled Drug Delivery: Concepts and Advances. 1st ed. New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2000. p. 54, 155, 196.
  7. Tortora G.J., Grabowski S.R. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. 10th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. p. 1861.
  8. Garg S., Sharma S. Gastroretentive drug delivery systems. Business Briefing: Pharmatech. 2005;67:265–272.

Photo
Preet Chavarkar
Corresponding author

Ideal college of pharmacy, Kalyan East

Photo
Madhu Kalasad
Co-author

AGM College of Pharmacy, Varur Hubballi

Photo
Ruchi Bhuran
Co-author

College of Pharmacy, Sawarde

Photo
Dimpal Chaudhari
Co-author

Shree P.E. Tatya Patil Institute of Pharmacy, Jalgaon

Photo
Nishigandha Dixit
Co-author

Shree P.E. Tatya Patil Institute of Pharmacy, Jalgaon

Photo
Anirudha Nilangekar
Co-author

Armed Forces Medical College, Wanowari, Pune

Preet Chavarkar, Madhu Kalasad, Ruchi Bhuran, Dimpal Chaudhari, Nishigandha Dixit, Anirudha Nilangekar, Gastroretentive Floating Drug Delivery: A novel Approach for Ondansetron release Enhancement, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 8, 3172-3177. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17008216

More related articles
Comparative Investigation Of Antidiabetic Effect O...
Gaurav Mittal, Pankaj Singh Niranjan, ...
Spectrophotometric Methods For Quantitative Estima...
Akash S Ingale, Vishwas S More, Suraj S Patil, Rahulsing U Khairn...
Panoptic Review On Psoriasis:Treatments, Types, And In-Depth Insights...
Pradnya Sandip Shinde , Prof.Pallavi R Kaple, Dr Prof.Sonia Singh, Dr.Nikhil Sutar, Manuja S Zade, P...
Quality Control Techniques: Empowering Total Quality Practices...
Diksha Dilip Ghyar, Minal Yogeshwar Katre, Chandak Kamala, Umekar Milind , ...
Related Articles
Pathophysiology of Diabetes Mellitus with Disease Economics ...
Akash Narbat, Vaibhav Madane, Namdeo Shinde , ...
A Review Article On The Chikungunya...
PADALA RAMESH , PATNALA VAISHNAVI GAYATHRI, BARIRA UMMUL KHAIR, NALLAPU SRIKRUTHI, ...
Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimation of...
Satyam Dhole , Prashant Mokate , Dr. P. P Jain , S. R. Ghodake , ...
Fabry Disease: Revisiting a Rare Disorder with Modern Therapies...
Vani Chatter, Gayatri Sirimani, Sunilkumar Meti, ...
More related articles
Spectrophotometric Methods For Quantitative Estimation Of Tramadol Hydrochloride...
Akash S Ingale, Vishwas S More, Suraj S Patil, Rahulsing U Khairnar , Tushar M Toke , Devendra D Tal...
Spectrophotometric Methods For Quantitative Estimation Of Tramadol Hydrochloride...
Akash S Ingale, Vishwas S More, Suraj S Patil, Rahulsing U Khairnar , Tushar M Toke , Devendra D Tal...