View Article

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and optimize Mupirocin liposomes for wound healing using a 3^2 full factorial design. The design involved two independent variables, cholesterol and phospholipon 90H, and three dependent variables, percent yield, particle size, and polydispersity index (PDI). The optimized formulation showed a percent yield of 72.87%, particle size of 264.30 nm, and PDI of 0.233. The in vitro release study revealed a diffusion-controlled mechanism, with 95.43% of the drug released within 12 hours. The optimized liposomes were spherical in shape and had a vesicular structure. The study demonstrated the importance of optimizing liposomal formulation for improved wound healing outcomes. The results of this study can be used to develop a topical treatment for wound infections, providing a promising approach for the management of this debilitating condition.

Keywords

Formulation And Evaluation, Evaluation of Mupirocin, independent variables, cholesterol and phospholipon.

Introduction

Mupirocin is a potent topical antibiotic used to treat bacterial skin infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, its poor solubility and limited penetration into the skin can hinder its effectiveness. Liposomes, microscopic vesicles composed of lipids, have emerged as a promising drug delivery system to enhance the topical delivery of mupirocin. The present study aims to formulate and evaluate mupirocin-loaded liposomes using Design Expert software, a statistical tool for optimizing formulation parameters. The optimized liposomal formulation will be evaluated for its anti-bacterial property, in vitro drug release, and stability. This study will provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential of liposomes as a topical delivery system for mupirocin, paving the way for the development of more effective treatments for bacterial skin infections. Formulation is a preparation activity in pharmaceutical science that focuses on designing the mix of active components and additives after passing pre formulation research. The traditional formulation step in the development of novel medications employs the strategy of modifying one variable or element at a time. Study the effect of composition and process variables on the dosage form first, then adjust one element while keeping another constant. This traditional method, however, has drawbacks, including being inefficient, unpredictable, time-consuming, and unable to describe the interactions that occur. A new strategy was devised to solve the inadequacies of the traditional formulation process, such as the Experimental Design or experimental design, which is an optimization technique. Optimization is required in the preparation formulation process to establish the optimal formula based on the evaluation data of the prepared product. Under some conditions, optimization can be described as a method for obtaining the best mix of product or process attributes. It can also mean choosing the best element or substance from a variety of possibilities. Various approaches are used to process the data from the predetermined assessment parameters. Software allows for more efficient data processing. Predictive data is combined with data generated after the experiment. Design Expert is one of the most extensively used programs.  Expert design is utilized for drug delivery system formulations such as extended-release tablets, targeted drug delivery such as liposomes, ethosomes, and nano particles, in addition to traditional medication formulations such as tablets and capsules. Its applications are not restricted to the pharmaceutical industry; for example, the optimization process for studying the ideal composition of vegetable oil mixtures as raw materials for biodiesel synthesis use Design Expert.  Because there are options/features that provide direction and can be selected according to the purpose of the design of experiments (DOE) or experimental design to be carried out, the assisted formulation utilizing the Design Expert is more profitable. As a result, a literature review is required to determine the extent to which Design Experts are used in formulations.  The wound is considered one of the complex processes in which the function and integrity of skin and deep underlying tissue are affected, resulting infection and inflammation. Infection of the wound by microbes may frequently occur due to poor hygienic conditions. The penetration and colonization of microorganisms in deeper segments of the tissue may cause tissue damage and, as a result, impede the healing process of the wound. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae are the most prevalent microorganisms responsible for the infection of wound. A moist environment on the wound bed is favourable to accelerating the cellular growth, migration of epithelial cells, and proliferation of collagen within the noncellular matrix. Therefore, substantial use of antimicrobial agents in wound dressing is required to prevent possible bacterial infection. The most commonly used topical antibiotics are mupirocin, silver sulfadiazine, neomycin, and bacitracin. Mupirocin (MUP, M.W: 500.622 g/mol) exerts antibacterial activity by inhibiting protein synthesis through binding to the isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase of bacteria. MUP is highly active against wound pathogens, e.g., aerobic gram-positive cocci such as Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, as well as some gram-negative cocci, including MRSA. Mupirocin is commercially available as a 2% ointment and treats skin infections, operative wounds, burns, and ulcers.

The solubility of mupirocin is a crucial issue in preparing an aqueous-based formulation. The formation of inclusion complex with water-soluble host molecules is one of the effective ways to improve aqueous solubility. ?-cyclodextrin (M.W: 1135.00 g/mol) is used as a solubility enhancer and is suitable for guest molecules with molecular weight between 200 and 800 g/mol. So far, and to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been done to prepare the mupirocin-?-cyclodextrin (MUP-?-CD) complex in-situ gel. Therefore, the present investigation aimed to enhance the aqueous solubility of MUP by using ?-CD as a complexing agent and to develop MUP-?-CD loaded in-situ gel to achieve a stable drug delivery system. The in-vitro and in-vivo activity of the optimized formulation was compared with a commercial product. The primary goal of wound management is to maintain a clean and moist environment at the wound site to support the physiological healing process, accelerate wound healing and prevent serious infections. Topical therapy is preferred for treating wound infections because the optimal antimicrobial concentration at the wound site for an appropriate duration, facilitates rapid delivery, improves adherence and minimizes the risk of systemic toxicity. However, in many clinical situations conventional topical formulations i.e. creams and ointment, fail to produce the desired therapeutic response because of their inability to adhere at the wound site and lose their rheological characteristics upon contact with the wound fluid. Consequently, non-specific delivery of drugs at infected sites results, necessitating higher doses. Mupirocin (MUP) is a topical antibiotic and drug of choice for treating primary and secondary superficial skin infections caused by SA and multidrug-resistant strains such as MRSA. MUP binds to enzyme the isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, resulting in RNA and protein synthesis inhibition and ultimately leading to bacterial death. MUP is available on the market in different topical formulations such as creams and ointments. However, their clinical use results in ineffective treatment owing to the poor solubility and dermal penetration of MUP, which necessitate frequent dosing. Nanotechnology offers a potential opportunity to increase the efficacy of current wound therapies by altering the biopharmaceutical and pharmacological characteristics of drugs. Among nanoparticles, stimuli-responsive nanocarriers offer the advantages of targeted and on-demand drug release and can minimize toxicity with improved therapeutic efficacy. Among these stimuli responsive nano-DDS, multifunctional lipid polymeric hybrid nanoparticles (LPHNs) are novel nanocarrier systems composed of phospholipids and polymers. This combination provides advantages of the combined attributes of polymeric nanoparticles and liposomes in terms of increased drug loading capacity, enhanced stability, structural uniformity and rigidity, controlled release, improved biocompatibility, and cellular uptake. For site-specific LPHN-loaded delivery systems the selection of lipids and polymers is important. Chitosan, a natural biodegradable polymer was used owing to its remarkable biological properties such as high stability, non-toxic nature, immunostimulant properties, innate anti-microbial potential and wound healing properties. Chitosan has a positive charge and adsorbs on negatively charged lipid NPs, where it forms a polyelectrolyte complex that release the drug at alkaline pH due to weakening of the complex. Considering the actual need for wound infection, this work was designed to fabricate novel pH-responsive MUP-loaded LPHNs based Hydrogel (MUP-LPHNs-HG) and MUP-LPHNs based film forming spray (MUP-LPHNs-FFS) for enhanced antibacterial activity and effective wound healing. To the best of our knowledge, no scientific investigations have evaluated the use of chitosan and phospholipid-based hybrid systems loaded in hydrogels and film forming sprays for the pH responsive release of MUP against resistant bacterial wound infections. The proposed pH responsive MUP-LPHNs were fabricated and incorporated into Carbopol® 934 Hydrogel and Eudragit S 100 FFS. The developed smart MUP-LPHNs-HG and MUP-LPHNs-FFS showed a smart pH responsive and sustained release of MUP at the wound site, whereas chitosan has positive charge and tends to adhere to the negatively charged bacterial surface. The pH responsive MUP-LPHNs-HG and MUP-LPHNs-FFS can kill bacteria more effectively, prevent bacterial resistance and promote wound healing. NEG is widely used as a tool for topical drug delivery because it can incorporate both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. Additionally, it enhances the stability of the formulation through reductions in surface and interfacial tension, which raises its viscosity, eases its application, and avoids gastrointestinal problems. Additionally, several investigations emphasized that NEG provides more stability in formulations than NE, which raises aqueous phase viscosity through a reduction in surface and interfacial tensions. Remarkably, in order to develop pharmaceutical products of the highest quality and with better attributes, it has been discovered that formulation by design (FBD) is a useful technique. This technique helps in the development of more effective, economical, and safe drug delivery systems towards the achievement of quality-by-design goals. This requires a reasonable approach to experimental strategies, such as using a central composite design (CCD) approach.

Mupirocin Liposomes

Compatibility Studies

FT-IR

FT-IR analyses were employed to explore potential interactions between the pharmaceutical and the excipients utilized. The identification of interactions relies on observing changes, shifts, or disform in functional group peaks of the drug. Figure 8 depicts the FT-IR spectra of Mupirocin and its physical mixture with polymers. Noteworthy variations in the position of characteristic peaks for Mupirocin, such as those at 3481 and 3308 cm-1 attributed to the O-H group, peaks at 1729 and 1712 cm- 1 corresponding to the C=O group, and peaks at 1232 and 1222 cm-1 corresponding to the C-O group, were not spot when compared to its physical mixture with the polymers. This indicates the compatibility of Mupirocin with the selected excipients.

       
            Figure-1.png
       

Figure-1: FT-IR spectra of Mupirocin and physical mixture of Mupirocin and polymers.

Contrastingial scanning calorimetry

The DSC thermograms exhibited distinct furthermost partothermic peaks aligning with the Mupirocin melting point at 77.31°C and 75.82°C for its physical mixture with polymers. This suggests an absence of interaction between Mupirocin and the studied polymers. Figure 2 and Table 1 present the DSC thermograms of Mupirocin and its physical mixture with polymers.

       
            Figure-2.png
       

Figure-2: DSC Thermograms of Mupirocin and physical mixture of Mupirocin with polymers.


Table-1: DSC data of Mupirocin and physical mixture of Mupirocin with  polymers.

 

SI.NO

Sample

To(° C)

Tm(° C)

Tc (° C)

Melting province (°C)

1

Mupirocin

73.57

77.31

81.45

7.88

2

Mupirocin + Polymers

70.81

75.82

79.73

7.88

To - Onset of melt, Tm - Melting point, Tc - Completion of melt, DSC data obtained at 10° C/min


Preparation of Mupirocin liposomes:

A arbitrary 32 full factorial design was executed, with cholesterol represented as A and phospholipon 90H represented as B, selected as unconditional variables, and percent yield (Y1), particle size (Y2), and PDI (Y3) designated as DV. The variables were investigated at three levels (-1, 0, +1), representing low, medium and high, respectively (refer to Table 5). Employing final formulation software, DE 9 (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), facilitated the execution of statistical final formulation procedures, which encompass RSM, including MRA, ANOVA, and final formulation of statistical data.


Table- 2: Variables Of 32 Factorial Designs of Mupirocin Liposomes

 

Inconditional variable

 

Levels

 

 

Low(mg)

Medium (mg)

High(mg)

(A) Cholesterol

200.00

300.00

400.00

(B) Phospholipon

400.00

500.00

600.00

Conditional variable

 

 

 

Y1

% Yield

Y2

Particle Size (nm) Y3

Y3

PDI

         

Table-3: Matrix Of 32 FD For Mupirocin Liposomes.

 

 

Factor 1

Factor 2

Run

(A) Cholesterol mg

(B) Phospholipon 90H mg

1.

400

500

2.

200

600

3.

300

600

4.

300

500

5.

400

600

6.

200

500

7.

400

400

8.

300

400

9.

200

400


Experiment was conducted for 9 runs (Table 3) by varying cholesterol and Phospholipon compositions and analyzed for the changed responses.

Experimental design

The outcome data obtained for various responses is represented in Table 4.


Table 4: Spot response in 32 factorial designs for Mupirocin liposomes.

 

 

Factor

Factor

Response

Response

Response

1

2

1

2

3

A: Cholesterol

B: Phospholipon 90H

Percent yield

Particle size

 

Std Run

 

 

 

 

PDI

 

(mg)

(mg)

(%)

(nm)

 

2 1

400

500

70.46

364.40

0.387

8 2

200

600

76.67

165.51

0.210

5 3

300

600

74.14

265.30

0.253

1 4

300

500

71.71

237.60

0.300

7 5

400

600

72.19

391.41

0.370

4 6

200

500

77.11

149.17

0.233

6 7

400

400

68.03

314.63

0.470

3 8

300

400

68.28

205.11

0.371

9 9

200

400

70.66

115.30

0.320


The outcomes, as illustrated in Table 4, indicates that the selected variables has significant influence on the targeted responses, including % yield, particle size, and PDI datas. These datas provinced from 68.03% to 77.11%, 115.30 to 391.41 nm, and 0.210 to 0.470, respectively. The utilization of the factorial design approach was given in subsequent regression equations.

Percent yield (%) = +65.660 +0.02293 * Cholesterol +0.0267 * Phospholipon 90H

Particle size (nm) = -230.83 +1.067 * Cholesterol +0.3119 * Phospholipon 90H

PDI = +0.365 +7.73333E-004 * Cholesterol -5.466667E-004 * Phospholipon 90H

Negative datas denote an adverse repercussion of specific variable on the response factor, while positive datas signify a + effect of a particular variable. The outcomes of polynomial regression were visually presented through 3-Dimensional graphs and contour plots (depicted in Figures 2 and 3).

ANOVA investigations confirmed the significance (p < 0>

Percent Yield:

The Mupirocin liposomal formulations exhibited a % yield enclosed by the province of 68.03±0.82% to 77.11±0.54% (refer to Table 5). Notably, this province showed significance concerning the polymer ratios utilized. A escalate in the cholesterol ratio correlated with a diminish in percent yield, while a escalate in the phospholipon ratio correlated with a escalate in percent yield.

Particle Size discernment and PDI:

The size of Mupirocin liposomal particle fell enclosed by the province of 116.50 to 391.41 nm. A positive correlation was spot between size of particles and the concentration of the cholesterol and phospholipon. Meanwhile, the PDI of the liposomal formulations provinced from 0.210 to 0.470 (see Table 5). These outcomes suggest that all formulations-maintained homogeneity.


Table-5: Percent yield, particle size and PDI of Mupirocin liposomes.

 

Formulations

Percent yield*

Size of particle *

PDI*

 

(%)

(nm)

 

LM1

70.46±0.56

364.40

0.387

LM2

76.67±0.77

165.51

0.210

LM3

74.14±0.61

265.30

0.253

 

 

 

 

LM4

71.71±0.98

237.60

0.300

LM5

72.19±0.44

391.41

0.370

LM6

77.11±0.54

149.17

0.233

LM7

68.03±0.82

314.63

0.470

LM8

68.28±0.68

205.11

0.371

*SD, (n=3)


       
            Figure-3.png
       

Figure-2:  3-D response surface plot portray the repercussion of cholesterol and phospholipon 90H on (A) percent yield, (B) size of particles and (C) PDI of Mupirocin liposomes.

       
            Figure-4.png
       

Figure-3: Counterplot representing the repercussion of cholesterol and phospholipon 90H on (A) percent yield, (B) Size of particle size and (C) PDI of Mupirocin liposomes respectively.

The regression analysis disclosed coefficients with a (-) sign for cholesterol and a (+) sign for phospholipon, indicating that the percent yield diminished with an increment in cholesterol concentration, while phospholipon led to an surge in the percent yield. Moreover, an escalate in both cholesterol and phospholipon concentrations emerged in an surge in particle size. However, the rise in phospholipon concentration concurrently surged in the PDI.

Entrapment Efficiency:

The entrapment efficiency of Mupirocin demonstrated variations based on lipid composition, ranging from 52.73±0.66% to 69.14±0.35% (refer to Table no. 6 and Figure no.4). An surge in cholesterol content enclosed by the liposomes correlated with an enhancement in Mupirocin entrapment to   certain extent. This effect attributes to the ability of cholesterol to escalate the rigidness of the liposomal membrane, thereby potentially enhancing stead lines and entrapment efficiency. However, over a certain concentration, cholesterol might disrupt the original structure of the liposomal membrane, outcoming in reduced entrapment efficiency.

Conversely, an surge in phospholipon ratio led to higher entrapment efficiency, while an surge in cholesterol ratio, diminishes entrapment efficiency. This observation may be attributed to the saturation of lipids moieties concerning the drug, where a low concentration of phospholipon limits the entrapment capacity.

Contents in drug

The contents in drug in the Mupirocin liposomal formulations was in the scale of 97.23±0.32 - 98.76±0.23% (Table no. 6 and Figure no. 4) representing the Mupirocin was uniformly distributed in the liposomes.


Table-6:  Entrapment efficiency and contents in drug Mupirocin liposomes.

 

Formulations

efficiency* (%)

Drug content*(%)

LM1

55.21±0.52

97.61±0.56

LM2

65.85±0.34

96.55±0.48

LM3

62.25±0.52

98.11±0.13

LM4

59.89±0.34

98.36±0.66

LM5

57.46±0.73

98.52±0.16

LM6

69.14±0.35

97.23±0.32

LM7

52.73±0.66

98.14±0.28

LM8

57.53±0.19

98.76±0.23

LM9

62.33±0.36

97.45±0.33

*S. D, (n=3)

 

 


       
            Figure-5.png
       

Figure-4: Entrapment efficiency and contents in drug in Mupirocin liposomes. Outline of regression analysis

In the given "F" datas, the associated "p" datas are consistently below 0.05 for all instances, signifying the significance of model terms. The Projected R-Squared demonstrates satisfactory concordance with the changed R-Squared. The assessment of signal-to-noise ratio through Requisite Precision reveals a ratio surpassing 4, which is considered desirable. The obtained value note worthy exceeds 4, providing confirmation of an ample signal (refer to Table 7)


Table-7: Outline of outcomes of regression analysis for responses.

 

 

Value

F-Value

P-Value

Percent yield

 

 

 

R-Square

0.8628

 

 

Changed R-Squared

0.8170

18.86

0.0026

Envision R-Squared

0.7039

 

 

Requisite Precision

12.248

 

 

Size of Particle

 

 

 

R-Square

0.9904

 

 

Changed R-Squared

0.9872

 

 

Envision R-Squared

0.9789

31.37

0.0001

Requisite Precision

43.704

 

 

PDI

 

 

 

R-Square

0.9521

 

 

Changed R-Squared

0.9362

 

 

 

 

59.66

0.0001

Envision R-Squared

0.8809

 

 

Requisite Precision

21.531

 

 


Final formulation

To formulate the final dosage forms (liposomes), well-defined limits for the output datas were established (refer to Table no.8). The design expert software was employed to calculate the combinations of variables that led to liposomes meeting the specified criteria. The congruence of the obtained outcomes (see Table no.9 and Figure no. 5) with the envision datas affirms the practicality and ensuring of the model.


Table-8: Final formulation of final Mupirocin liposomes.

 

 

 

Phospholipon

Percent

Particle

 

Cholesterol

 

 

 

PDI

Value

(mg)

90H (mg)

Yield (%)

Size (nm)

 

Envision

270.85

599.99

75.45

246.48

0.247

Actual

270.85

599.99

72.87

264.30

0.233

Relative

-

-

2.57

17.81

0.013

error (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 


Table-9:  Particle size with PDI of Mupirocin liposomes.

 

Formulation

Particle size (nm)

PDI (PDI)

OLM

265.50

0.263


       
            Figure-6.png
       

Figure-5:  Size Particle distribution of Mupirocin liposomes

In vitro API liberate studies of the final formulation liposome (OLM)

The Mupirocin in vitro dissolution profile from the refined liposomes reached (95.43±0.22%) after 12 hours (refer to Table no. 10 and Figure no. 6). Notably, a escalated ratio of cholesterol in the formulation of the liposomal led to prolonged drug retention, aligning with previous findings that emphasized the role of cholesterol in Ext furthermost parting drug liberate duration99. The delayed liberate of Mupirocin attributes to its lipophilic nature, effectively held by the liposomal membrane's small fragments117. Examining the liberate kinetics, it was evident that Mupirocin liberation from liposomes followed a diffusion-controlled mechanism. A straight correlation emerged when plotting the percent of drug liberated against the square root of time, as per the   Higuchi equation (see Table 10). These findings resonate with other studies highlighting the diffusion-controlled liberate mechanism for drugs from liposomes113,118.


Table- 10: In vitro dissolution profile data of refined Mupirocin liposomes (OLM) in phosphate buffer pH 7.4

 

 

CDR*

(%)

Time (h)

 

 

 

 

OLM

 

0

0

 

1.

10.65±0.24

 

2.

19.89±0.81

 

3.

26.75±0.52

 

4.

35.59±0.41

 

5.

44.85±0.78

 

6.

53.78±0.51

 

7.

61.97±0.45

 

8.

72.84±0.79

 

9.

81.75±0.51

 

10.

87.59±0.23

 

11.

92.84±0.78

 

12.

95.43±0.22

*S. D, n=3

 

 


       
            Figure-7.png
       

Figure-6: In vitro API liberate profile of final Mupirocin liposomes (OLM) in phosphate buffer pH 7.


Table-11: Liberate kinetic data of final Mupirocin liposomal formulation (OLM)

 

Formulation

Zero order

First order

Higuchi

Korsemeyer-Peppas

 

 

R2

R2

R2

R2

n

OLM

0.9953

0.8455

0.9050

0.8455

1.6355


Shape of liposomes:

The shapes of most of the Mupirocin provided liposomes were spherical in shape as shown in Figure 7.

       
            Figure-8.png
       

Figure-7: Images of final Mupirocin liposomes (OLM) under 45X 10 magnification

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Liposomes surface morphology and shape were investigated by SEM analysis (Figure 8). The Mupirocin provided liposomes have vesicular structure and were spherical in shape.

       
            Figure no -9.png
       

Figure no 8 : SEM images of refined Mupirocin liposomes (OLM)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The optimized liposomes were spherical in shape and had a vesicular structure. The study demonstrated the importance of optimizing liposomal formulation for improved wound healing outcomes. The results of this study can be used to develop a topical treatment for wound infections, providing a promising approach for the management of this debilitating condition. The use of a 3^2 full factorial design allowed for the evaluation of the effects of cholesterol and phospholipon 90H on the percent yield, particle size, and PDI of the liposomes. The results showed that the selected variables had a significant influence on the targeted responses. The study also investigated the entrapment efficiency and API content of the Mupirocin liposomes. The results showed that the entrapment efficiency ranged from 52.73±0.66% to 69.14±0.35%, and the API content ranged from 97.23±0.32% to 98.76±0.23%. The in vitro release study revealed a diffusion-controlled mechanism, with 95.43% of the drug released within 12 hours. The optimized liposomes were spherical in shape and had a vesicular structure. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the importance of optimizing liposomal formulation for improved wound healing outcomes. The results of this study can be used to develop a topical treatment for wound infections, providing a promising approach for the management of this debilitating condition. The optimized Mupirocin liposomes had a high percent yield, uniform particle size, and low PDI. The entrapment efficiency and API content of the optimized liposomes were also high. The in vitro release study revealed a diffusion-controlled mechanism, with 95.43% of the drug released within 12 hours. The study demonstrated the potential of using liposomes as a topical treatment for wound infections. The results of this study can be used to develop a novel treatment option for wound infections, providing a promising approach for the management of this debilitating condition.

REFERENCES

        1. Debasish Sahoo, Development of QbD-based mupirocin-?-cyclodextrin complex loaded thermosensitive in-situ gel for wound healing in mice, sciencedirect, Version of Record 20 June 2023.
        2. Shahid Ali Khan, Naveed Ahmed, Dildar Khan, pH-responsive mupirocin-loaded hybrid nanoparticles in hydrogel and film forming spray against resistant bacterial wound infections, sciencedirect, Version of Record 14 September 2024.
        3. Yan sopyani, Dolhi gozali, Sriwidodo, Rizka khoirunnisa guntinai, design-expert software (doe): an application tool for optimization in pharmaceutical preparations formulation, researchgate, Vol 14, issue 4, 2022.
        4. Jain NK. Controlled and novel drug delivery, 1st edi, CBS Publishers 2005; 51: 452.
        5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, and Andes D. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:503–535.
        6. Vyas S.P. and Khar R.K. Targeted and controlled drug delivery. 1st edition, CBS Publishers 2008; 340: 42-47.
        7. Krishna AS, Amareshwar P, Chakravarty P. Chitosan Nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. RJPBCS 2010; 1: 474-84.
        8. Yvette N K, Robert G, Eric A. Preparation and characterization of sterile and freeze-dried Nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2002; 233: 239-252.
        9. Clisson M.E, Pinto-Alphandary H, Ourevitch M, Andremont A and Couvreur P. Development of ciprofloxacin-loaded Nanoparticles: a physicochemical study                                                 of the drug carrier. J Control Release 1998; 56: 23-32.
        10. Hui L, BoChen, Zhengwei M, Changyou G. Chitosan Nanoparticles for Loading of Toothpaste Actives and Adhesion on Tooth Analogs. J. Appl Polymer Sci 2007;28;4248-56.
        11. Wim H De Jong, Paul JA Borm. Drug delivery and nanoparticles, application and hazards. Int J Nanomedicine 2008; 3: 133-49.
        12. Hemendrasinh J, Rathod and Dhruti P Mehta. A Review on Pharmaceutical Gel. Acta Scienti Int J of Pharm Sci 2015; l: 33-47.
        13. Ashni Verma, Sukhdev Singh, Rupinder Kaur, Upendra K Jain.Topical Gels as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review.Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res 2013; 23:374-382.
        14. Smart JD, Mortazavi SA. Drug Delivery Research group. J of Phar and Pharmacology 1994; 46:86-90.
        15. Bhalaria M, Naik S, Misra A. A novel delivery system for antifungal drugs in the treatment of topical fungal disease. Indian J Exp Biol 2009; 47:368-75.
        16. Gupta GD, Gound RS.Release rate of nimesulide from different gallants. Indian J Pharm Sci1999; 61: 229-234.
        17. Sera UV, Ramana MV. In vitro skin absorption and drug release – a comparison of four commercial hydrophilic gel preparations for topical use. The Indian Pharmacist 2003; 73: 356-360.
        18. Sahoo SK, Samal AR. Estimation and evaluation of Secnidazole. The Indian Pharmacist 2006; 5: 73.
        19. Niyaz Basha.B, Kalyani Prakasam, Divakar Goli. Formulation and evaluation of Gel containing Fluconazole-Antifungal agent. Int J of Drug Development & Rese 2011; 3:109-128.
        20. Piyusha Deveda, Ankur Jain, Naveen Vyas, Hemant Khambete, Sanjay Jain. Jellified Emulsion for Sustain Delivery Of Itraconazole For Topical Fungal Diseases. Int J of Pharmacy and Pharma Sci 2010; 2:104-112.
        21. Maitri Shah, Dr. Dixit Modi, Dr. Dhiren Shah. Formulation, Design and Evaluation of Microemulsion and Micro- Emulgel of Itraconazole for Topical Application. IJPPR 2017;9 :125-146.
        22. Nirosha. M, Hima Varsh K, Sai Prema.A R, Samdani.K, Amrutha.V and Dwarakanatha Reddy. L. Formulation and Evaluation of Itraconazole Ophthalmic In Situ Gels. JPS 2017; 4: 1101-1108.
        23. Baudonnet.L, Pere D, Michaud.P, Grossiord.J L & Rodriguez F. Effect of Dispersion Stirring Speed on the Particle Size Distribution and Rheological Properties of Carbomer Dispersions and Gels. J of Dispersion Sci and Tech 2002; 23: 499-510.
        24. Xianghai, et al Protective effect of amino acids on the muscle injury of aerobics athletes after endurance exercise based on CT images published online on 2022 Mar19.
        25. Gordon BS, et al. Regulation of muscle protein synthesis and the. Int J effects ofstates. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45: 2147–215. [Google Scholar]
        26. Bodine SC, et al. Skeletal muscle atrophy and the E3 ubiquitin ligases MuRF1 and MAFbx/atrogin-1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307: E469–E484. [Google Scholar].

Reference

  1. Debasish Sahoo, Development of QbD-based mupirocin-?-cyclodextrin complex loaded thermosensitive in-situ gel for wound healing in mice, sciencedirect, Version of Record 20 June 2023.
  2. Shahid Ali Khan, Naveed Ahmed, Dildar Khan, pH-responsive mupirocin-loaded hybrid nanoparticles in hydrogel and film forming spray against resistant bacterial wound infections, sciencedirect, Version of Record 14 September 2024.
  3. Yan sopyani, Dolhi gozali, Sriwidodo, Rizka khoirunnisa guntinai, design-expert software (doe): an application tool for optimization in pharmaceutical preparations formulation, researchgate, Vol 14, issue 4, 2022.
  4. Jain NK. Controlled and novel drug delivery, 1st edi, CBS Publishers 2005; 51: 452.
  5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, and Andes D. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:503–535.
  6. Vyas S.P. and Khar R.K. Targeted and controlled drug delivery. 1st edition, CBS Publishers 2008; 340: 42-47.
  7. Krishna AS, Amareshwar P, Chakravarty P. Chitosan Nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. RJPBCS 2010; 1: 474-84.
  8. Yvette N K, Robert G, Eric A. Preparation and characterization of sterile and freeze-dried Nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2002; 233: 239-252.
  9. Clisson M.E, Pinto-Alphandary H, Ourevitch M, Andremont A and Couvreur P. Development of ciprofloxacin-loaded Nanoparticles: a physicochemical study                                                 of the drug carrier. J Control Release 1998; 56: 23-32.
  10. Hui L, BoChen, Zhengwei M, Changyou G. Chitosan Nanoparticles for Loading of Toothpaste Actives and Adhesion on Tooth Analogs. J. Appl Polymer Sci 2007;28;4248-56.
  11. Wim H De Jong, Paul JA Borm. Drug delivery and nanoparticles, application and hazards. Int J Nanomedicine 2008; 3: 133-49.
  12. Hemendrasinh J, Rathod and Dhruti P Mehta. A Review on Pharmaceutical Gel. Acta Scienti Int J of Pharm Sci 2015; l: 33-47.
  13. Ashni Verma, Sukhdev Singh, Rupinder Kaur, Upendra K Jain.Topical Gels as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review.Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res 2013; 23:374-382.
  14. Smart JD, Mortazavi SA. Drug Delivery Research group. J of Phar and Pharmacology 1994; 46:86-90.
  15. Bhalaria M, Naik S, Misra A. A novel delivery system for antifungal drugs in the treatment of topical fungal disease. Indian J Exp Biol 2009; 47:368-75.
  16. Gupta GD, Gound RS.Release rate of nimesulide from different gallants. Indian J Pharm Sci1999; 61: 229-234.
  17. Sera UV, Ramana MV. In vitro skin absorption and drug release – a comparison of four commercial hydrophilic gel preparations for topical use. The Indian Pharmacist 2003; 73: 356-360.
  18. Sahoo SK, Samal AR. Estimation and evaluation of Secnidazole. The Indian Pharmacist 2006; 5: 73.
  19. Niyaz Basha.B, Kalyani Prakasam, Divakar Goli. Formulation and evaluation of Gel containing Fluconazole-Antifungal agent. Int J of Drug Development & Rese 2011; 3:109-128.
  20. Piyusha Deveda, Ankur Jain, Naveen Vyas, Hemant Khambete, Sanjay Jain. Jellified Emulsion for Sustain Delivery Of Itraconazole For Topical Fungal Diseases. Int J of Pharmacy and Pharma Sci 2010; 2:104-112.
  21. Maitri Shah, Dr. Dixit Modi, Dr. Dhiren Shah. Formulation, Design and Evaluation of Microemulsion and Micro- Emulgel of Itraconazole for Topical Application. IJPPR 2017;9 :125-146.
  22. Nirosha. M, Hima Varsh K, Sai Prema.A R, Samdani.K, Amrutha.V and Dwarakanatha Reddy. L. Formulation and Evaluation of Itraconazole Ophthalmic In Situ Gels. JPS 2017; 4: 1101-1108.
  23. Baudonnet.L, Pere D, Michaud.P, Grossiord.J L & Rodriguez F. Effect of Dispersion Stirring Speed on the Particle Size Distribution and Rheological Properties of Carbomer Dispersions and Gels. J of Dispersion Sci and Tech 2002; 23: 499-510.
  24. Xianghai, et al Protective effect of amino acids on the muscle injury of aerobics athletes after endurance exercise based on CT images published online on 2022 Mar19.
  25. Gordon BS, et al. Regulation of muscle protein synthesis and the. Int J effects ofstates. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45: 2147–215. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bodine SC, et al. Skeletal muscle atrophy and the E3 ubiquitin ligases MuRF1 and MAFbx/atrogin-1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307: E469–E484. [Google Scholar].

Photo
T. Harika
Corresponding author

NRI College of Pharmacy, Pothavarappadu, Agiripalli. 521212

Photo
Y. Veerendranadh
Co-author

NRI College of Pharmacy, Pothavarappadu, Agiripalli. 521212

Photo
K. Hema
Co-author

NRI College of Pharmacy, Pothavarappadu, Agiripalli. 521212

Photo
Aseem Nazia Shaik
Co-author

NRI College of Pharmacy, Pothavarappadu, Agiripalli. 521212

Photo
D. Ramya
Co-author

NRI College of Pharmacy, Pothavarappadu, Agiripalli. 521212

T. Harika*, Y. Veerendranadh, K. Hema, Aseem Nazia Shaik, D. Ramya, Formulation And Evaluation of Mupirocin Loaded Liposomes by Design Expert Software, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 2, 622-635. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14842590

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash ...
Sri Sowmya Veeravalli, Dr.P.Narayana Raju, Dr.V.Bhaskara Raju, J....
Formulation And Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo P...
Suvarna Kasi, Dr.B.Nagamani , Dr.P.V.Madhavi latha, P. Sivalalith...
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shi...
Formulation and Evaluation of Kalanchoe Pinnata Syrup: A Pharmaceutical Dosage F...
Ravula Tulasi Naga Pavan Kumar, Boddani Sunil, Pattem Sirsha, Suma Sri Potti, Ayennedi Kusuma Lalith...
Formulation and Evaluation of Kalanchoe Pinnata Syrup: A Pharmaceutical Dosage F...
Ravula Tulasi Naga Pavan Kumar, Boddani Sunil, Pattem Sirsha, Suma Sri Potti, Ayennedi Kusuma Lalith...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash ...
Sri Sowmya Veeravalli, Dr.P.Narayana Raju, Dr.V.Bhaskara Raju, J.N.B Indu Sekhar, B.Roshini Teja Man...
Related Articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash ...
Sri Sowmya Veeravalli, Dr.P.Narayana Raju, Dr.V.Bhaskara Raju, J.N.B Indu Sekhar, B.Roshini Teja Man...
A Comprehensive Review on The Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Cough Syrup...
Dipali Chaudhari , Khushi Patil , Jagruti Wankhede , Saeed Ahmed, Shaikh Habiburrahman, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo Powder ...
Suvarna Kasi, Dr.B.Nagamani , Dr.P.V.Madhavi latha, P. Sivalalitha, Dr. P. Uma , ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Kalanchoe Pinnata Syrup: A Pharmaceutical Dosage F...
Ravula Tulasi Naga Pavan Kumar, Boddani Sunil, Pattem Sirsha, Suma Sri Potti, Ayennedi Kusuma Lalith...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash ...
Sri Sowmya Veeravalli, Dr.P.Narayana Raju, Dr.V.Bhaskara Raju, J.N.B Indu Sekhar, B.Roshini Teja Man...
More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash ...
Sri Sowmya Veeravalli, Dr.P.Narayana Raju, Dr.V.Bhaskara Raju, J.N.B Indu Sekhar, B.Roshini Teja Man...
Formulation And Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo Powder ...
Suvarna Kasi, Dr.B.Nagamani , Dr.P.V.Madhavi latha, P. Sivalalitha, Dr. P. Uma , ...
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shilpa Patel , ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Body Wash ...
Sri Sowmya Veeravalli, Dr.P.Narayana Raju, Dr.V.Bhaskara Raju, J.N.B Indu Sekhar, B.Roshini Teja Man...
Formulation And Evaluation of Polyherbal Shampoo Powder ...
Suvarna Kasi, Dr.B.Nagamani , Dr.P.V.Madhavi latha, P. Sivalalitha, Dr. P. Uma , ...
Preparation And Evaluation Of Herbal Hair Spray...
Nikunj Patadiya, Hetal Dalvi , Priti Patel , Darshana Dalvi , Shilpa Patel , ...