View Article

Abstract

Famotidine is a histamine H2 receptor antagonist that is widely used in the treatment of acid related gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and Zollinger Ellison syndrome. However, the drug has certain pharmacokinetic limitation including relatively low oral bioavailability and a short biological half-life, which require frequent dosing to maintain therapeutic drugs levels in the body. These limitations may reduce patient compliance and therapeutic effectiveness. To overcome these problems, the development of sustained release drug delivery systems has gained considerable attention in pharmaceutical research. The present study focuses on the formulation and evaluation of sustained release matrix tablets of famotidine using hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) as a rate controlling polymers. Sustained release matrix tablets are designed to release the drug gradually over an extended period, thereby maintaining a constant therapeutic concentration in the bloodstream and reducing the need for frequent administration. HPMC is widely used in matrix tablet formulations due to its excellent swelling gel forming and drug release controlling properties.In this formulation approach, the matrix tablets are generally prepared using suitable methods such as direct compression or wet granulation, where famotidine is uniformly dispersed within the polymer matrix. Various concentration of HPMC is incorporated in the formulation to regulate the drug release rate. When the tablet comes into contact with gastrointestinal fluids, the polymer swells and forms a gel layer around the tablet. This gel barrier controls the diffusion of the drug from the matrix system, resulting in a prolonged and controlled drug release. The prepared matrix tablets are evaluated using several pre-compression and post-compression parameters to ensure their quality and performance. Pre-compression study includes parameters such as Bulk density, tapped density, Carr’s index, Hausner’s ratio, and angle of repose to assess the flow propertiesof the powder blend. Post -compression evaluation involves testing parameters such as hardness, friability, weight variation, thickness, drug content uniformity, and in-vitro dissolution studies. The dissolution studies help to determine the rate and pattern of drug release from the matrix tablet and confirm the sustained release behavior of the formulation. The development of sustained release matrix tablet of famotidine using HPMC offers several advantages, including prolonged drug release, improved therapeutic efficacy, reducing dosing frequency, and better patient compliance. Therefore, such formulations can be considered an effective approach for the controlled delivery of famotidine in the management of acid related gastrointestinal disorders

Keywords

Famotidine, Sustained release, Matrix tablet, Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), Controlled drug delivery, In-vitro evaluation, Gastrointestinal disorders

Introduction

Oral drug delivery systems remain in the most widely used and preferred route of drug administration due to their convenience, safety and patient compliance. Among the various oral dosage forms, tablets are the most commonly used because they are easy to manufacture, stable, and allow accurate dosing. However, many conventional tablets release the drug rapidly after administration, which can lead to fluctuations in drug concentration in the body. These fluctuations may cause reduced therapeutic effectiveness and sometimes unwanted side effects. To overcome these limitations, modified or controlled drug delivery systems have been developed1. Sustained release drug delivery systems are designed to release the drug slowly over an extended period of time, thereby maintaining a relatively constant drug concentration in the bloodstream. Such systems help in reducing the frequency of drug administrations, improving patient compliance, and minimizing side effects associated with sudden peaks in drug levels. Sustained release formulations are especially beneficial for drugs that have a short biological half-life and require frequent dosing to maintain their therapeutic effect. Matrix tablets are one of the most commonly used approaches for developing sustained release formulations. In these systems, the drug is uniformly dispersed within a polymer matrix that controls the rate of drug release. The release of the drug from the matrix occurs through mechanisms such as diffusion, dissolution, and erosion of the polymer. Matrix systems are widely preferred because they are simple to formulate, cost-effective, and suitable for large-scale manufacturing1,2. Among the various polymers used in sustained release formulations, hydrophilic polymers have gained significant attention due to their safety, biocompatibility, and ability to control drug release effectively. One such polymer is Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC), which is widely used in pharmaceutical formulations. HPMC is a semi-synthetic, ono-ionic cellulose ether that forms a gel layer when it comes into contact with aqueous fluids. This gel layer acts as a barrier that controls the penetration of water into the tablet and the diffusion of the drug from the matrix. As the outer layer of the tablet hydrates and swells, the drug gradually diffuses out, providing a sustained release effect over a n extended period. Famotidine is a histamine H2 receptor antagonist that is commonly used in the treatment of various acid related gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and Zollinger Ellison syndrome. It works by inhibiting the action of histamine on H2 receptors located on gastric parietal cells, thereby reducing the secretion of gastric acid. Although famotidine is effective in managing these conditions, it has a relatively short elimination half-life, frequent dosing is often required to maintain effective therapeutic levels in the body2.

Drug Profile- Famotidine

Famotidine is a histamine H2 receptor antagonist that is widely used for the treatment of acid -related gastrointestinal disorders. It is commonly prescribed for conditions such as gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The drug reduces gastric acid secretion and helps in healing ulcers and relieving symptoms caused by excess stomach acid.In the treatment of benign gastric and duodenal ulcers, famotidine is generally administered orally at a dose of 40 mg once daily at bedtime for about 4-8 weeks. For the management of GERD, the usual recommended dose is 20 mg taken orally twice daily for 6-12 weeks.Famotidine shows incomplete absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in a relatively low oral bioavailability of about 40-45%. Additionally, the drug has a short biological half-life pf approximately2.5-3.5 hours. Due to these pharmacokinetic limitations, famotidine often requires multiple daily dosing. Therefore, developing a sustained- release formulation can help maintain therapeutic drug levels for a longer period and improve patient compliance3.Pharmacologically, famotidine acts as a competitive antagonist of histamine H2 receptors located on gastric parietal cells. By blocking these receptors, it inhibits the stimulation of acid secretion in the stomach. This property makes famotidine effective in treating disorders associated with excessive gastric acid production.Compared with other H2 receptor antagonists, famotidine shows high selectivity and potency for the H2 receptor. Studies involving healthy volunteers and patients with acid-hypersecretory conditions have shown that famotidine is 20-50 times more potent than cimetidine and approximately eight times more potent than ranitidine in reducing gastric acid secretion3.Famotidine is widely available and used both as a prescription medicine and as an over-the-counter drug. While oral formulations are most commonly used, intravenous preparations are also available for use in hospital settings when oral administrations are not possible.The drug belongs to a class of medications known as H2- blockers, which work by reducing the amount of acid produced by the stomach. This helps in relieving symptoms such as heartburn, acid reflux, and ulcer pain4.

 

 

Figure 1.1: Structure of Famotidine

Famotidine is available in several dosage forms, including3,4:

Tablets:

Powder for oral suspension

These formulations allow flexibility in dosing and make the medication suitable for both adult and pediatric patients.

Generic Name:  Famotidine

Brand Name:

 Duexis, Duo Fusion, Fluxid, Good Sense Acid Reducer, Pepcid, Pepcid Complete, Zantac Reformulated Aug 2022

Chemical Formula: C8H15N7O2S3

IUPAC Name: [{(2- [(diamino methylidene) amino]-1,3-thiazol-4-yl} methyl) sulfanyl]-N-sulfamoylpropanimidamide

Molecular Weight: 337.5 g/mol

Density: Famotidine Powder Density: 1.838 g/cm

Melting Point: 163.5

Boiling Point: 662.383   at 760mmHg

Colour: White to Pale Yellow Crystals

Taste: Bitter Taste

Odour: Odorless

State: Solid Crystals

Solubility: 1000mg/L

Freely soluble in glacial acetic acid, slightly soluble in methanol, very slightly soluble in water, and practically insoluble in ethanol.

Solubility in water: 0.1% (w/v) at 293k

Mechanism of Action:

Famotidine works by inhibiting histamine-2 (H2) receptors present on the gastric parietal cells in the stomach. Normally, histamine stimulates these cells to produce gastric acid. By competitively blocking these receptors, famotidine reduces the secretion of gastric acid.As a result, the drug decreases both actually both the acidity and the total volume of gastric secretions. It is effective in reducing basal and nighttime acid secretion and also lowers acid production stimulated by food, caffeine, insulin and pentagastrin4,5,6.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption:

After oral administration, famotidine has a bioavailability of about 40-45%. The drug usually begins to act within 1 hour, and its maximum effect is seen in 1-3 hours. When given intravenously, the peak effect occurs in about 30 minutes. The acid-suppressing effect generally lasts 10-12hours.

Distribution:

Famotidine shows low plasma protein binding (15-20%) and has a small volume of distribution (about 1.0-1.3 L/kg)7.

Metabolism:

Only a small amount of famotidine undergoes metabolism in the liver. It is mainly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, particularly CYP1A28.

Elimination:

The elimination half-life of famotidine is about 2.5-3.5 hours. Around 65-70% of the drug is excreted unchanged in urine. In patients with severe kidney problems, the half-life can increase to more than 20 hours, so the dose must be adjusted. Children with chronic kidney disease may also show changes in famotidine pharmacokinetics9.

Administration:

Dosage Forms and Strengths

Famotidine is available in several dosage forms such as tablets, oral suspensions and intravenous solution. Tablets are commonly available in 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40mg strengths.

The IV formulation can be given either as a slow injection over at least 2 minutes or as an infusion for 15-30 minutes. The oral suspension should be shaken well before use, while tablets can be taken with or without food10.Over-the-counter (OTC) famotidine is available as tablets, chewable tablets, and gel capsules in 10 mg or 20 mg strengths. These tablets should be taken 10-60 minutes before foods or drinks that may cause heartburn, and they should not be used for more than two weeks unless advised by a doctor.A combination product containing famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide is also available11.

Adult Dosage:

Duodenal ulcer (active):

40 mg orally at bedtime for upto 8 weeks, or 20 mg twice daily.

Maintenance therapy for duodenal ulcer:

20 mg once daily at bedtime.

Gastric ulcer:

40 mg once daily at bedtime for up to 8 weeks.

Non-erosive GERD:

20 mg twice daily for up to 6 weeks.

GERD with erosive esophagitis:

20-40 mg twice daily for up to 12 weeks.

Hypersecretory conditions:

20-60 mg every 6 hours, starting with 20 mg every 6 hours.

Special Populations

Renal impairment:

Dose reduction is required because the drug is mainly eliminated through the kidneys13.

Pregnancy:

Famotidine can cross the placenta. It may be used during pregnancy if the benefits outweigh the risks, especially when lifestyle changes and antacids do not control symptoms13,14.

Breastfeeding:

Small amount of famotidine can pass into breast milk, but available evidence suggests it is unlikely to cause harm to the infant15.

Older adults:

Lower doses are recommended if kidney function is reduced16.

Pediatric patients:

The usual dose is 1 mg/kg per day divided into two doses17,18.

Adverse Effects:

Famotidine is generally well tolerated. Some common side effects include:

Headache, Dizziness, Diarrhea, Constipation

Agitation (more common in infants)

Intravenous administration may sometimes cause local irritation at the injection site. Rarely, famotidine may cause thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), which requires discontinuation of the drug19,20,21,22.

Drug Interactions:

Famotidine has minimal effects on liver enzymes, so it usually causes few drug interactions. However, it can reduce the absorption of some medications that require stomach acid for proper absorption. It should not be used with drugs such as cefuroxime, dasatinib, delavirdine, neratinib, pazopanib, and risedronate.

It may also increase the levels of tizanidine, so these two drugs should generally not be used together23,24.

Contraindications:

Famotidine should not be used in patients who have allergy or hypersensitivity to famotidine or other H2 receptor antagonists such as cimetidine25.

OTC famotidine should also not be used by patients who have26,27:

  1. Difficulty swallowing food
  2. Vomiting with blood
  3. Black or bloody stools
  4. Severe kidney problems

Monitoring:

Since famotidine is mainly eliminated through the kidneys, renal function should be monitored, especially in older patients. In cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, healthcare providers may also monitor complete blood count and gastric ph.

Toxicity:

Famotidine is mainly eliminated from the body through the kidneys. Therefore, patients with impaired renal function may have a higher risk of drug accumulation and toxicity. For this reason, dose adjustment is necessary in individuals with moderate to severe renal impairment to prevent excessive drug levels in the body.Clinical information from the famotidine package insert indicates that oral doses as high as 640 mg per day, which are significantly higher than the approved therapeutic doses, have been administered to patients with severe acid-hypersecretory conditions. Interestingly, these high doses did not produce any serios adverse effects. In most reported cases, symptoms of drug overdose were similar to the usual side effects observed during normal therapeutic use7,28.Management of famotidine overdose generally involves removing any unabsorbed drug from the gastrointestinal tract, closely monitoring the patient, and providing supportive treatment when required.Famotidine is classified as a pregnancy category B drug, which means that studies have not shown significant risk to the fetus, but the medication should still be used during pregnancy only when the expected benefits outweigh potential risks.The drug can also be excreted in breast milk. Therefore, when prescribing famotidine to breastfeeding mothers, healthcare providers should carefully consider the benefits to the mother and the possible effects on the infant. Compared with other H2 receptor antagonists, famotidine is found in lower concentrations in breast milk, which may make it a relatively safer option for use during breastfeeding14,29.

Effervescent Floating Drug Delivery System (FDDS):

Effervescent floating drug delivery systems are designed to remain floating in the stomach for a prolonged period, which helps in controlled drug release. These systems contain a floating chamber filled with air, water, vacuum, or inert gas, which reduces the density of the dosage form and allows it to float on gastric fluid.In this system, carbon dioxide (CO2) gas is produced through an effervescent reaction between organic acids such as citric acid and carbonate or bicarbonate salts. The generated gas becomes trapped within the structure of the dosage form, which helps the tablet float in the stomach31. Effervescent FDDS are usually prepared using swellable polymers such as methylcellulose, chitosan, or similar hydrocolloid polymers. These polymers swells when they come in contact with gastric fluid and form a gel-like matrix. Along with these polymers, effervescent agents such as sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, and tartaric acid are incorporated into the formulation. When the dosage form reaches the acidic environment of the stomach, the effervescent components react and release carbon dioxide gas. The gas becomes trapped within the swollen hydrocolloid matrix, decreasing the density of the system. As a result, the dosage form remains buoyant in the gastric fluids, allowing the drug to be released slowly over an extended period for use during breastfeeding32.

 

 

 

Figure 1.2:  GRDDS based on effervescence

 

Gas Generating System:

This buoyant delivery system uses effervescence reaction between citric acid/ tartaric acid and carbonate/bicarbonate salts to release CO2 which further reduces its specific gravity and makes it float over chime.Low density FDDS is based on the release of CO2 upon contact with gastric fluids after oral administration. The materials are formulated in such a way that after entering in the stomach, CO2 is liberated due to reaction with acidic gastric content and which get entrapped in the gel-based hydrocolloid. It produces an upward motion of the dosage forms and maintains its buoyancy. Ultimately it causes a decrease in specific gravity of dosage form and hence resulting into a float on the chime. The CO2 generating components are mixed within the tablet matrix in a single layer or multi-layered form to produce gas generating mechanism in hydrocolloid layer, and the drug in the other layer results into a sustained release effect33.

 

 

 

Figure 1.3: Mechanism of floatation via CO2 liberation

 

CONCLUSION

The formulation of sustained release matrix tablets of famotidine using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) represents an effective strategy for improving the drug’s therapeutic performance. Since famotidine has a relatively short half-life and moderate bioavailability, conventional dosage forms may require frequent dosing. Incorporating the drug into a polymetric matrix system helps to slow down the drug release rate, allowing the medication to be delivered gradually over an extended period. HPMC acts as a suitable release-controlling polymer because of its swelling and gel-forming properties, which regulate the diffusion of the drug from the matrix. Based on various studies and evaluation, HPMC-based matrix tablets can successfully provide controlled and prolonged drug release while maintaining acceptable tablet quality parameters. This type of sustained release formulation helps reduce dosing frequency, improve patient convenience, and enhance overall treatment effectiveness. Therefore, sustained release matrix tablets of famotidine prepared with HPMC offer a promising approach for the effective management of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders.

REFERENCES

  1. Jain AK, Hatila U. A review on floating drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Studies and Research. 2011 Jul;2(3):1-6.
  2. Ubhe TS, Gedam P. A brief overview on tablet and it’s types. Journal of Advancement in Pharmacology. 2020 Oct 27;1(1):21-31.
  3. Al-Omar MA, Al-Mohizea AM. Famotidine. InProfiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology 2009 Jan 1 (Vol. 34, pp. 115-151). Academic Press.
  4. Nagaraju R, Penchala Prathusha A, Subhash Chandra Bose P, Kaza3 R, Bharathi K. Preparation and evaluation of famotidine polymorphs. Current Drug Discovery Technologies. 2010 Jun 1;7(2):106-16.
  5. Talke PO, Solanki DR. Dose-response study of oral famotidine for reduction of gastric acidity and volume in outpatients and inpatients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1993 Dec 1;77(6):1143-8.
  6. Berlin RG, Clineschmidt BV, Majka JA. Famotidine: an appraisal of its mode of action and safety. The American journal of medicine. 1986 Oct 24;81(4):8-12.
  7. Miyata K, Kamato T, Nishida A, Honda K. Studies on the mechanism for the gastric mucosal protection by famotidine in rats. The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology. 1991;55(2):211-22.
  8. Echizen H, Ishizaki T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of famotidine. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1991 Sep;21(3):178-94.
  9. Poudel RR, Kafle NK. Tizanidine-induced acute severe cystitis in a female taking famotidine. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications. 2015 Jul 29:83-5.
  10. Maples HD, James LP, Stowe CD, Jones DP, Hak EB, Blumer JL, Vogt B, Wilson JT, Kearns GL, Wells TG. Famotidine disposition in children and adolescents with chronic renal insufficiency. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2003 Jan;43(1):7-14.
  11. Garg V, Narang P, Taneja R. Antacids revisited: review on contemporary facts and relevance for self-management. Journal of International Medical Research. 2022 Mar;50(3):03000605221086457.
  12. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG. 2013 Mar 1;108(3):308-28.
  13. Harada R, Ishikura K, Shinozuka S, Mikami N, Hamada R, Hataya H, Morikawa Y, Omori T, Takahashi H, Hamasaki Y, Kaneko T. Ensuring safe drug administration to pediatric patients with renal dysfunction: a multicenter study. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology. 2018 Aug;22(4):938-46.
  14. American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anaesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anaesthesiology. 2007;106:843-63.
  15. Richter JE. The management of heartburn in pregnancy. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2005 Nov;22(9):749-57.
  16. Levonorgestrel I. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed)[Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2019:63-7.
  17. Samuel MJ. By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® update expert panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J. Am. Geriatric. Soc. 2023;71:2052-81.
  18. Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, Cabana M, DiLorenzo C, Gottrand F, Gupta S, Langendam M, Staiano A, Thapar N, Tipnis N. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2018 Mar;66(3):516-54.
  19. Vandenplas Y, Huysentruyt K. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in preterm infants: unmet needs. Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2024 Sep 1;18(9):485-91.
  20. Poluzzi E, Raschi E, Moretti U, De Ponti F. Drug?induced torsades de pointes: data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS). Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2009 Jun;18(6):512-8.
  21. 21.McRorie JW, Kirby JA, Miner PB. Histamine2-receptor antagonists: rapid development of tachyphylaxis with repeat dosing. World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics. 2014 May 6;5(2):57.
  22. Compoginis JM, Gaspard D, Obaid A. Famotidine use and thrombocytopenia in the trauma patient. The American Surgeon. 2011 Dec;77(12):1580-3.
  23. 23.Harinstein LM, Kane-Gill SL, Smithburger PL, Culley CM, Reddy VK, Seybert AL. Use of an abnormal laboratory value–drug combination alert to detect drug-induced thrombocytopenia in critically Ill patients. Journal of critical care. 2012 Jun 1;27(3):242-9.
  24. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Bethesda (MD): Jan 25, 2018. Famotidine. [PubMed]
  25. Patel D, Bertz R, Ren S, Boulton DW, Någård M. A systematic review of gastric acid-reducing agent-mediated drug–drug interactions with orally administered medications. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2019 Dec 2;59(4):447.
  26. Song WJ, Kim MH, Lee SM, Kwon YE, Kim SH, Cho SH, Min KU, Kim YY, Chang YS. Two cases of H2-receptor antagonist hypersensitivity and cross-reactivity. Allergy, asthma & immunology research. 2011 Apr 1;3(2):128-31.
  27. Hutchinson HM, Sayre BE, Prettyman T, King E. Evaluating sterility of single dose vials on an automated compounding device. Hospital pharmacy. 2017 Apr;52(4):286-93.
  28. Fukuda H, Kamidani R, Okada H, Kitagawa Y, Yoshida T, Yoshida S, Ogura S. Complex poisoning mainly with benzyl alcohol complicated by paralytic ileus: a case report. International journal of emergency medicine. 2022 Dec;15(1):31.
  29. Lin JH, Chremos AN, Yeh KC, Antonello J, Hessey GA. Effects of age and chronic renal failure on the urinary excretion kinetics of famotidine in man. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 1988 Jan;34(1):41-6.
  30. Garbis H, Elefant E, Diav-Citrin O, Mastroiacovo P, Schaefer C, Vial T, Clementi M, Valti E, McElhatton P, Smorlesi C, Rodriguez EP. Pregnancy outcome after exposure to ranitidine and other H2-blockers: A collaborative study of the European Network of Teratology Information Services. Reproductive Toxicology. 2005 Mar 1;19(4):453-8.
  31. Vasave VS. A review on: floating drug delivery system. World J Pharmaceut Res. 2023;12(2):641-69.
  32. Razavi FS, Kouchak M, Feizoleslam F, Veysi M. An overview on floating drug delivery systems (FDDS); conventional and new approaches for preparation and in vitro–in vivo evaluation. FABAD Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 Dec 1;46(3):345-62.
  33. Salve PS. Development and in vitro evaluation of gas generating floating tablets of metformin hydrochloride. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011 Dec 28;1(4):105-12.

Reference

  1. Jain AK, Hatila U. A review on floating drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Studies and Research. 2011 Jul;2(3):1-6.
  2. Ubhe TS, Gedam P. A brief overview on tablet and it’s types. Journal of Advancement in Pharmacology. 2020 Oct 27;1(1):21-31.
  3. Al-Omar MA, Al-Mohizea AM. Famotidine. InProfiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology 2009 Jan 1 (Vol. 34, pp. 115-151). Academic Press.
  4. Nagaraju R, Penchala Prathusha A, Subhash Chandra Bose P, Kaza3 R, Bharathi K. Preparation and evaluation of famotidine polymorphs. Current Drug Discovery Technologies. 2010 Jun 1;7(2):106-16.
  5. Talke PO, Solanki DR. Dose-response study of oral famotidine for reduction of gastric acidity and volume in outpatients and inpatients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1993 Dec 1;77(6):1143-8.
  6. Berlin RG, Clineschmidt BV, Majka JA. Famotidine: an appraisal of its mode of action and safety. The American journal of medicine. 1986 Oct 24;81(4):8-12.
  7. Miyata K, Kamato T, Nishida A, Honda K. Studies on the mechanism for the gastric mucosal protection by famotidine in rats. The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology. 1991;55(2):211-22.
  8. Echizen H, Ishizaki T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of famotidine. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1991 Sep;21(3):178-94.
  9. Poudel RR, Kafle NK. Tizanidine-induced acute severe cystitis in a female taking famotidine. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications. 2015 Jul 29:83-5.
  10. Maples HD, James LP, Stowe CD, Jones DP, Hak EB, Blumer JL, Vogt B, Wilson JT, Kearns GL, Wells TG. Famotidine disposition in children and adolescents with chronic renal insufficiency. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2003 Jan;43(1):7-14.
  11. Garg V, Narang P, Taneja R. Antacids revisited: review on contemporary facts and relevance for self-management. Journal of International Medical Research. 2022 Mar;50(3):03000605221086457.
  12. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG. 2013 Mar 1;108(3):308-28.
  13. Harada R, Ishikura K, Shinozuka S, Mikami N, Hamada R, Hataya H, Morikawa Y, Omori T, Takahashi H, Hamasaki Y, Kaneko T. Ensuring safe drug administration to pediatric patients with renal dysfunction: a multicenter study. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology. 2018 Aug;22(4):938-46.
  14. American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anaesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anaesthesiology. 2007;106:843-63.
  15. Richter JE. The management of heartburn in pregnancy. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2005 Nov;22(9):749-57.
  16. Levonorgestrel I. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed)[Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2019:63-7.
  17. Samuel MJ. By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® update expert panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J. Am. Geriatric. Soc. 2023;71:2052-81.
  18. Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, Cabana M, DiLorenzo C, Gottrand F, Gupta S, Langendam M, Staiano A, Thapar N, Tipnis N. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2018 Mar;66(3):516-54.
  19. Vandenplas Y, Huysentruyt K. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in preterm infants: unmet needs. Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2024 Sep 1;18(9):485-91.
  20. Poluzzi E, Raschi E, Moretti U, De Ponti F. Drug?induced torsades de pointes: data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS). Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2009 Jun;18(6):512-8.
  21. 21.McRorie JW, Kirby JA, Miner PB. Histamine2-receptor antagonists: rapid development of tachyphylaxis with repeat dosing. World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics. 2014 May 6;5(2):57.
  22. Compoginis JM, Gaspard D, Obaid A. Famotidine use and thrombocytopenia in the trauma patient. The American Surgeon. 2011 Dec;77(12):1580-3.
  23. 23.Harinstein LM, Kane-Gill SL, Smithburger PL, Culley CM, Reddy VK, Seybert AL. Use of an abnormal laboratory value–drug combination alert to detect drug-induced thrombocytopenia in critically Ill patients. Journal of critical care. 2012 Jun 1;27(3):242-9.
  24. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Bethesda (MD): Jan 25, 2018. Famotidine. [PubMed]
  25. Patel D, Bertz R, Ren S, Boulton DW, Någård M. A systematic review of gastric acid-reducing agent-mediated drug–drug interactions with orally administered medications. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2019 Dec 2;59(4):447.
  26. Song WJ, Kim MH, Lee SM, Kwon YE, Kim SH, Cho SH, Min KU, Kim YY, Chang YS. Two cases of H2-receptor antagonist hypersensitivity and cross-reactivity. Allergy, asthma & immunology research. 2011 Apr 1;3(2):128-31.
  27. Hutchinson HM, Sayre BE, Prettyman T, King E. Evaluating sterility of single dose vials on an automated compounding device. Hospital pharmacy. 2017 Apr;52(4):286-93.
  28. Fukuda H, Kamidani R, Okada H, Kitagawa Y, Yoshida T, Yoshida S, Ogura S. Complex poisoning mainly with benzyl alcohol complicated by paralytic ileus: a case report. International journal of emergency medicine. 2022 Dec;15(1):31.
  29. Lin JH, Chremos AN, Yeh KC, Antonello J, Hessey GA. Effects of age and chronic renal failure on the urinary excretion kinetics of famotidine in man. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 1988 Jan;34(1):41-6.
  30. Garbis H, Elefant E, Diav-Citrin O, Mastroiacovo P, Schaefer C, Vial T, Clementi M, Valti E, McElhatton P, Smorlesi C, Rodriguez EP. Pregnancy outcome after exposure to ranitidine and other H2-blockers: A collaborative study of the European Network of Teratology Information Services. Reproductive Toxicology. 2005 Mar 1;19(4):453-8.
  31. Vasave VS. A review on: floating drug delivery system. World J Pharmaceut Res. 2023;12(2):641-69.
  32. Razavi FS, Kouchak M, Feizoleslam F, Veysi M. An overview on floating drug delivery systems (FDDS); conventional and new approaches for preparation and in vitro–in vivo evaluation. FABAD Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 Dec 1;46(3):345-62.
  33. Salve PS. Development and in vitro evaluation of gas generating floating tablets of metformin hydrochloride. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011 Dec 28;1(4):105-12.

Photo
Nutan sahu
Corresponding author

Rungta institute of pharmaceutical sciences

Photo
Tannu Sahu
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Photo
Rohit Singh
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Photo
Sushmita Pradhan
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Photo
Khemchand Sahu
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Photo
Santosh Singh
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Photo
Razi Ahmed
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Photo
Suchita Wamankar
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Photo
Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Photo
Dr. Chanchal Deep Kaur
Co-author

Rungta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Tannu Sahu, Rohit Singh, Sushmita Pradhan, Khemchand Sahu, Santosh Singh, Razi Ahmed, Nutan Sahu, Suchita Wamankar, Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Sahu, Dr. Chanchal Deep Kaur, Development and Evaluation of Gastroretentive sustained release system of Famotidine using HPMC, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 3, 3368-3377, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19234909

More related articles
A Comprehensive Review of Triphala as an Herbal In...
Mohammed Usman Chikkerur, Syed Imran, Geetha Bandi, Laxmi Patil, ...
Development and Characterization of Ornidazole Nan...
Dr. Mona Piplani, Khushal Mittal, Dr. Rishu Yadav, Pankaj Bhateja...
Congestive Heart Failure: Relevant Treatment and E...
Siddhant Sankhe , Harshali Thakare, ...
Community Pharmacist Knowledge and Practices on Antibiotics (Otc): An Observati...
R. Kalidasan, Dr. Jayaprakash Shanmugam, Dr. S. K. Senthil kumar Kulanthaivel, S. Arunkumar, S. Bhuv...
Preparation And Evaluation Of Polyherbal Antacid Powder...
Mr. Akash D. Surve , Pooja K. Khanzode, Prathamesh S. Shinde, Samiksha M. Pakhare, Shyam G. Rekhe,...
A Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Metformin And Capsicum Annuum & Histopat...
Kalwala saritharani , K.Purnachander, G.Natender Naik, ...
Related Articles
Review On Ethosomal And Trans Ethosomal Drug Delivery System...
Munde Gaurav Vinod , V. M. Satpute, Ghodake S. R., ...
A Comprehensive Review of Triphala as an Herbal Ingredient in Skin Care System...
Mohammed Usman Chikkerur, Syed Imran, Geetha Bandi, Laxmi Patil, Prajwal Bhosage, Y V Vijayananditha...
More related articles
A Comprehensive Review of Triphala as an Herbal Ingredient in Skin Care System...
Mohammed Usman Chikkerur, Syed Imran, Geetha Bandi, Laxmi Patil, Prajwal Bhosage, Y V Vijayananditha...
Development and Characterization of Ornidazole Nanosuspension for Enhanced Solub...
Dr. Mona Piplani, Khushal Mittal, Dr. Rishu Yadav, Pankaj Bhateja, ...
A Comprehensive Review of Triphala as an Herbal Ingredient in Skin Care System...
Mohammed Usman Chikkerur, Syed Imran, Geetha Bandi, Laxmi Patil, Prajwal Bhosage, Y V Vijayananditha...
Development and Characterization of Ornidazole Nanosuspension for Enhanced Solub...
Dr. Mona Piplani, Khushal Mittal, Dr. Rishu Yadav, Pankaj Bhateja, ...