SCS College of Pharmacy, Harapanahalli.
Cancer remains one of the leading causes of global mortality and morbidity, and traditional chemotherapy—although effective in tumor shrinkage—has significant limitations due to nonspecific cytotoxicity, drug resistance and severe toxicity profiles. Recent scientific advances in molecular oncology and immunotherapy have facilitated the development of new-generation anticancer drugs, including targeted therapy, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), PARP inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy and next-generation hormonal agents. These therapies enable precision treatment by selectively targeting malignant cells, improving survival outcomes, reducing systemic toxicity and enhancing quality of life. Comparative evaluation demonstrates that new-generation anticancer drugs provide improved progression-free survival and response rates across major cancers such as breast cancer, lung cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and melanoma. However, challenges including adverse immune-mediated reactions, high cost, limited accessibility and development of resistance still remain. This journal review discusses mechanisms, clinical efficacy, toxicity comparison, limitations, and future perspectives in the transition from conventional to novel anticancer drug therapy to improve patient outcomes.
Cancer is a complex, heterogeneous, and life-threatening disease characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation and metastatic potential. Globally, cancer constitutes one of the most formidable public health challenges, contributing to millions of deaths every year and exerting significant financial and social burdens. The rising incidence is associated with several factors—including increased life expectancy, genetic predisposition, lifestyle modifications, environmental pollution, occupational exposure to carcinogens, physical inactivity, obesity, tobacco and alcohol consumption. The rapid global increase in cancer cases demands more effective therapeutic strategies that not only improve survival but also optimize patient quality of life.
For decades, conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy remained the mainstay of cancer treatment. These therapies operate by indiscriminately destroying rapidly dividing cells, affecting both cancerous and healthy tissues. This lack of selectivity frequently results in severe toxicities, such as anemia, neutropenia, nausea, neurotoxicity, alopecia, mucositis, and immunosuppression. Moreover, tumor cells often develop drug resistance through genetic mutations and adaptive metabolic mechanisms, which reduce long-term treatment success and lead to relapse or metastatic progression. Although conventional therapies remain essential in curative and adjuvant settings, their limitations highlight the need for more advanced therapeutic modalities.
Advancements in genomics, proteomics, immunology, and tumor microenvironment research have revolutionized cancer treatment through **precision medicine**, where therapeutic decisions are guided by individual molecular signatures. This led to the emergence of **new-generation anticancer drugs** such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), PARP inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, and next-generation hormonal modulators. These modern therapies offer enhanced tumor specificity, reduced toxicity, improved survival outcomes, and better tolerability compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents.
The clinical impact of these new-generation therapies is evident across several cancer types. For example, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab have transformed metastatic melanoma outcomes; targeted therapies such as imatinib have revolutionized chronic myeloid leukemia management, increasing long-term survival dramatically; HER2-targeted agents like trastuzumab and trastuzumab-deruxtecan significantly improved survival in HER2-positive breast cancer. However, despite their benefits, new-generation drugs face challenges such as high cost, immune-related adverse events, limited biomarker identification, complex administration protocols, and resistance mechanisms.
Therefore, a comparative evaluation of these modern anticancer drugs with conventional treatments is essential to understand their advantages, challenges, and future opportunities for improving patient prognosis and quality of life.
DISCUSSION
Classification of New-Generation Anticancer Drugs
|
Category |
Examples |
Mechanism |
Key Benefits |
|
Targeted therapy (TKIs) |
Imatinib, Osimertinib, Erlotinib |
Inhibit specific molecular pathways such as EGFR, ALK |
High specificity, minimal toxicity |
|
Immunotherapy (ICIs) |
Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab |
Block PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4 immune evasion pathways |
Durable immune response |
|
Monoclonal antibodies |
Rituximab, Trastuzumab |
Target specific tumor antigens |
Reduced systemic toxicity |
|
Antibody-drug conjugates |
T-DM1, Enhertu |
Targeted cytotoxic delivery |
Effective in resistant tumors |
|
PARP inhibitors |
Olaparib, Niraparib |
Synthetic lethality for BRCA-mutated cancers |
Personalized therapy |
|
CAR-T cell therapy |
Tisagenlecleucel |
Genetically engineered T-cell targeting |
High remission in leukemias |
Comparative Efficacy with Traditional Chemotherapy
|
Parameter |
Conventional Chemotherapy |
New-Generation Drugs |
|
Selectivity |
Nonspecific |
Targeted to tumor pathways |
|
Toxicity |
High systemic toxicity |
Lower toxicity, more tolerable |
|
Survival improvement |
Moderately effective |
Long-term remission possible |
|
Resistance |
Common |
Reduced, mutation-specific |
|
Quality of life |
Poor |
Significantly improved |
|
Immune response |
Suppressed |
Activated and enhanced |
Clinical Outcome Improvements
Limitations and Challenges
CONCLUSION
New-generation anticancer drugs represent a major advancement in cancer management offering improved precision, reduced toxicity, enhanced survival, and better quality of life compared to traditional chemotherapy. Their clinical benefits have transformed treatment outcomes for several malignancies. However, challenges related to cost, adverse events, and resistance emphasize the need for continued research, combination strategies, biomarker-based selection, and improved accessibility. Future oncology will increasingly rely on personalized medicine and integrated therapeutic models for optimal patient outcomes.
REFERENCES
Dr. Vinuth Chikkamath, J. S. Venkatesh, Dona Sajan*, Feba. G. Jose, Ferina U., Nashreennisa Begum, Comparative Evaluation of New-Generation Anticancer Drugs for Improved Patient Outcomes, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 1988-1991 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17906865
10.5281/zenodo.17906865