We use cookies to make sure that our website works properly, as well as some ‘optional’ cookies to personalise content and advertising, provide social media features and analyse how people use our site. Further information can be found in our Cookies policy
Medicinal plants have been an integral part of traditional and modern healthcare systems, serving as primary sources of bioactive compounds. However, ensuring the safety, efficacy, and authenticity of herbal medicines remains a global challenge due to issues such as adulteration, variability in phytochemical content, and lack of standardization. Chromatographic fingerprinting has emerged as a reliable and holistic approach for quality control of medicinal plants, as it provides comprehensive chemical profiles rather than focusing on a single marker compound. Techniques such as thin-layer chromatography (TLC/HPTLC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), and advanced hyphenated methods (LC-MS, GC-MS, UPLC-QTOF) are extensively employed to generate characteristic fingerprints for authentication, detection of adulteration, and consistency evaluation. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages, limitations, regulatory perspectives, and recent advances of chromatographic fingerprinting, with case studies on key medicinal plants and formulations. Integration with chemometrics, metabolomics, and artificial intelligence is highlighted as a future direction to enhance standardization of herbal medicines.
For thousands of years, human beings have turned to plants as their first pharmacy. Long before the rise of modern medicine, leaves, roots, barks, and flowers provided relief from illness, guided by traditional systems such as Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and Unani medicine. Even today, in an era dominated by synthetic pharmaceuticals, medicinal plants continue to hold a special place. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), nearly four out of five people worldwide still rely on herbal remedies for at least some aspect of primary healthcare.
This reliance is not only cultural but also practical. Herbal remedies are often more accessible, affordable, and perceived as safer compared to synthetic drugs. The global herbal medicine market is booming and is expected to exceed USD 400 billion by 2030, showing how deeply these remedies are woven into our daily lives. Products like turmeric supplements, ginseng tonics, and ashwagandha capsules are now sold across the world, from local markets to international pharmacies.[1]
However, this growing popularity brings with it a serious concern: quality control. Unlike a synthetic drug, which contains a single active compound in a well-defined dose, medicinal plants are complex chemical factories. Their therapeutic properties come from a mixture of dozens, sometimes hundreds, of bioactive molecules working together. These compounds can vary widely depending on:
Where the plant is grown – soil, climate, altitude.
How it is harvested and stored – timing of harvest, drying methods, storage conditions.
How it is processed – extraction techniques, formulation practices.
This variability can lead to inconsistent efficacy, loss of potency, and even safety risks when adulteration or substitution occurs. Sadly, cases of herbal products being mixed with cheaper substitutes or contaminated with toxic adulterants are not rare, leading to declining trust among patients and regulators.
This is where chromatographic fingerprinting steps in as a powerful solution. Instead of focusing on one compound, fingerprinting captures the entire chemical signature of a plant extract—almost like a biochemical “barcode” unique to each species. Just as every human has a unique fingerprint, every medicinal plant has a distinctive chromatographic profile that reflects its identity and quality.[2]
Chromatographic techniques such as Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC), High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Gas Chromatography (GC), and advanced hyphenated methods like LC-MS or GC-MS allow scientists to separate, visualize, and analyze the complex phytochemical mixtures in plants. These techniques not only help in authentication and detection of adulteration but also ensure batch-to-batch consistency in herbal formulations—a crucial requirement in the global market.
Recognizing their importance, international organizations such as WHO, Indian Pharmacopoeia, Chinese Pharmacopoeia, European Medicines Agency (EMA), and US Pharmacopeia have strongly recommended chromatographic fingerprinting for the standardization and quality control of herbal drugs.
In short, chromatographic fingerprinting represents a bridge between tradition and modern science. It honors the complexity of medicinal plants while providing the reliability and reproducibility demanded by modern healthcare. As herbal medicines continue to grow in popularity, this approach ensures that patients receive safe, authentic, and effective products rooted in centuries of wisdom but validated by cutting-edge science.[3]
Concept of Chromatographic Fingerprinting
Chromatographic fingerprinting is a modern and reliable way to check the quality, authenticity, and consistency of medicinal plants and herbal formulations. Instead of depending on just one or two chemical markers, this method looks at the complete chemical profile of a plant extract. The resulting pattern – often called a “fingerprint” – is unique to each plant, much like a barcode, and can be used to easily distinguish genuine herbs from adulterated, substituted, or poor-quality ones.[4]
Key Principles
Holistic Representation → Captures the whole set of phytochemicals in a plant, not just one compound.
Comparative Analysis → The fingerprint of a sample is compared with that of an authentic reference.
Reproducibility & Specificity → A good fingerprint should always show the same pattern of peaks or bands when analyzed repeatedly.
Techniques Commonly Used
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC / HPTLC): Simple, cost-effective, and widely used for herbal medicines; produces characteristic spots and bands.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC / UPLC): Provides precise separation with detailed quantitative data.
Gas Chromatography (GC / GC-MS): Ideal for analyzing volatile oils and semi-volatile compounds.
Authentication of Medicinal Plants → Detecting substitution and adulteration.
Quality Control of Herbal Medicines → Ensuring consistency from batch to batch.
Pharmacopoeial Standards → Many international pharmacopoeias (WHO, Chinese, Indian) now recommend chromatographic fingerprints as reference standards.
Adulterant & Contaminant Detection → Identifying impurities or undeclared substances in herbal preparations.[6]
Advantages
Holistic and reliable approach to quality control.
Can analyze multiple compounds at the same time.
Works for both raw herbs and finished formulations.
Limitations
Requires advanced instruments and skilled analysts.
Data interpretation can be challenging without chemometric tools.
Fingerprints may vary due to differences in plant source, climate, or extraction methods.[7]
Chromatographic Techniques in Fingerprinting
Chromatography is a fundamental tool in the analysis and standardization of medicinal plants. The principle of chromatography is simple: different compounds in a mixture move at different rates when passed through a stationary phase under the influence of a mobile phase, allowing separation, identification, and quantification of individual components. In the context of medicinal plants, chromatographic techniques are used to generate “fingerprints”—unique chemical profiles that reflect the composition and quality of a plant or herbal formulation. Over the years, multiple chromatographic approaches have been developed, each with its own strengths, limitations, and applications.[8]
TLC is one of the simplest and most cost-effective chromatographic methods. A plant extract is applied as a small spot on a plate coated with a thin layer of adsorbent (like silica gel). The plate is then placed in a solvent, which moves up the plate by capillary action. Different compounds travel at different speeds depending on their polarity and interaction with the adsorbent, forming distinct spots or bands.
HPTLC is an advanced version of TLC with finer particles in the stationary phase, giving better resolution, reproducibility, and sensitivity. HPTLC also allows densitometric scanning, so peaks can be quantified rather than just visually observed.
Applications:
Authentication: Identifying the genuine plant species based on characteristic band patterns.
Detection of Adulteration: Spotting extra or missing bands that indicate contamination or substitution.
Standardization: Comparing multiple batches of a formulation to ensure consistency.
Example:
Fingerprinting of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) roots using HPTLC can detect major withanolides and ensure purity across batches.[9]
HPLC separates compounds based on their interactions with a stationary phase in a column and a liquid mobile phase. Compounds that interact more strongly with the stationary phase move slower, creating distinct peaks on a chromatogram. Detectors (UV, PDA, ELSD) then measure each compound.
UPLC is a faster, more sensitive version of HPLC with smaller particles in the column. It allows higher resolution, shorter run times, and less solvent usage.
Applications:
Quantitative Analysis: Measures exact concentrations of bioactive compounds like curcuminoids in turmeric or ginsenosides in ginseng.
Fingerprinting: Produces a precise chromatogram representing all detectable compounds, forming a “chemical fingerprint.”
Quality Control: Ensures that each batch of raw material or herbal formulation has consistent chemical composition.
Example:
Fingerprinting of Curcuma longa rhizomes can separate curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin peaks to verify authenticity.[10]
3. Gas Chromatography (GC) / GC-MS
Explanation:
GC is used for volatile and semi-volatile compounds. The sample is vaporized and carried by an inert gas through a column coated with stationary phase. Compounds separate based on volatility and interaction with the column, producing a chromatogram with distinct peaks.
GC-MS combines separation (GC) with mass spectrometry (MS), giving both quantitative data and structural information about each compound.
Applications:
Essential Oils Analysis: Detects terpenes, phenols, and other volatile constituents.
Adulteration Detection: Identifies foreign oils or solvents in herbal extracts.
Quality Assurance: Ensures correct composition of volatile-rich herbal formulations.
Example:
Fingerprinting of Mentha spp. essential oils can separate menthol, menthone, and limonene peaks to verify species identity.[11]
Hyphenated techniques combine chromatography with mass spectrometry. After separation in the chromatographic column, compounds are ionized and analyzed based on mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). This gives both separation and structural identification, allowing detection of compounds even in very low concentrations.
UPLC-QTOF-MS is a particularly advanced technique, giving high-resolution, accurate mass measurements, useful for metabolomics and chemotaxonomy.
Applications:
Identification of Unknown Compounds: Detects minor phytoconstituents or new metabolites.
Authentication and Adulteration Detection: Confirms the identity of plant species and detects impurities.
Metabolomic Profiling: Compares chemical profiles across species, batches, or geographic locations.
Complex Formulation Analysis: Useful for polyherbal preparations containing dozens of compounds.
Example:
LC-MS fingerprinting of Ayurvedic multi-herb tablets can detect and quantify all major and minor bioactive compounds simultaneously, ensuring product safety and efficacy.[12]
Applications in Quality Control of Medicinal Plants
Chromatographic fingerprinting has emerged as a powerful tool for quality control of herbal drugs and medicinal plant formulations. Unlike conventional quality assessment, which often relies on single-marker compounds, fingerprinting captures the entire chemical profile, providing a holistic and reliable measure of authenticity, purity, and consistency. The applications are vast and critical, especially as herbal medicines gain global popularity.[13]
1. Authentication of Species
One of the most important applications is ensuring that the plant material used is genuine. Many herbal products in the market are at risk of being substituted with closely related or cheaper species, which may compromise efficacy or even cause toxicity.
How Chromatographic Fingerprinting Helps:
Fingerprints generated using TLC, HPLC, or LC-MS show distinct patterns of peaks or bands unique to each species. By comparing a sample’s profile with a reference standard, researchers can confirm its identity.
Example:
Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) can be distinguished from similar-looking plants like Physalis minima using HPTLC fingerprinting of withanolides.
Panax ginseng can be differentiated from Panax quinquefolius based on ginsenoside profiles.[14]
This prevents mislabeling, protects consumers, and maintains credibility in the herbal industry.
2. Detection of Adulteration or Substitution
Adulteration and substitution are widespread in the herbal market, either intentionally (to cut costs) or unintentionally (due to misidentification). These practices can reduce therapeutic efficacy or introduce toxic compounds.
Chromatographic fingerprinting solution:
By analyzing the complete chemical profile, unexpected peaks or missing characteristic peaks reveal adulterants or substitutions. This is more reliable than testing for a single marker compound, which may not detect complex adulterations.[15]
Example:
Ginseng products may be adulterated with cheaper Panax species or fillers; HPLC fingerprinting of ginsenosides can quickly detect such substitutions.
Essential oils like peppermint or eucalyptus can be mixed with cheaper oils, which GC-MS can identify.[16]
This ensures that consumers receive authentic, safe, and effective herbal products.
3. Chemotaxonomy
Chemotaxonomy is the classification of plants based on chemical composition rather than morphology. Chromatographic fingerprinting provides detailed chemical profiles that can be used to differentiate closely related species or study phylogenetic relationships.
Applications:
Distinguishing species in a genus that are morphologically similar.
Understanding regional variations in phytochemical content.
Supporting conservation and sustainable use by correctly identifying endangered or rare species.
Example:
Fingerprinting flavonoids or alkaloids in Lamiaceae species can classify them into distinct groups according to chemical similarity.[17]
4. Batch-to-Batch Consistency
In industrial herbal formulations, consistency is key. Active ingredient levels can vary due to differences in soil, climate, harvest time, or processing methods. Fingerprinting allows manufacturers to monitor chemical profiles across different batches, ensuring that every product meets the same quality standards.
Applications:
Standardizing polyherbal capsules or tablets.
Validating that commercial extracts contain consistent levels of bioactive compounds.
Ensuring reproducibility in clinical trials or therapeutic applications.
Example:
HPLC fingerprints of turmeric extracts ensure consistent curcumin content in capsules across production lots.[18]
5. Stability and Shelf-Life Studies
Medicinal plant extracts can degrade over time due to light, temperature, humidity, or oxidation, which may reduce efficacy or create harmful degradation products. Chromatographic fingerprinting allows researchers to monitor stability and predict shelf-life.
Applications:
Identifying degradation products that appear over time.
Optimizing storage conditions to maintain potency.
Ensuring that packaged herbal formulations remain effective until their expiration date.
Example:
Fingerprinting curcuminoids in turmeric powder under different storage conditions can indicate how fast the bioactive compounds degrade, helping manufacturers determine shelf-life.[19]
6. Additional Applications in Quality Control
Detection of Heavy Metals or Contaminants: Some hyphenated techniques (e.g., LC-MS, GC-MS) can detect pesticide residues or heavy metal-related compounds in herbal extracts.
Standardization of Multi-Herb Formulations: Polyherbal products often contain dozens of active compounds; fingerprinting ensures all herbs contribute to the intended chemical profile.
Support for Regulatory Approval: Many pharmacopoeias and international agencies now require chromatographic fingerprints as part of herbal product registration and approval.[20]
Case Studies: Chromatographic Fingerprinting of Medicinal Plants and Herbal Formulations
Chromatographic fingerprinting
has been widely applied to both individual medicinal plants and complex herbal formulations. These case studies illustrate how different chromatographic techniques are used to ensure authenticity, quality, and consistency of herbal medicines.
1. Curcuma longa (Turmeric)
Background: Curcuma longa is one of the most widely used medicinal plants, valued for its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties. Its major bioactive compounds are curcuminoids, including curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin.
Techniques Used: HPLC and HPTLC are commonly used to generate fingerprints of curcuminoids.
Applications:
Authentication: Distinguishing genuine turmeric from adulterants such as Curcuma zedoaria or synthetic dyes.
Quality Control: Ensuring consistent curcuminoid content across different batches.
Stability Studies: Monitoring curcuminoid degradation under different storage conditions.
Example: HPTLC plates reveal characteristic bands corresponding to curcumin, while HPLC chromatograms show distinct peaks for each curcuminoid, providing both qualitative and quantitative assessment.[21]
2. Panax ginseng
Background: Ginseng is highly valued in traditional medicine for its adaptogenic and immunomodulatory effects, largely attributed to ginsenosides.
Techniques Used: LC-MS and HPLC fingerprinting are employed to separate and identify multiple ginsenosides simultaneously.
Applications:
Species Authentication: Distinguishing Panax ginseng from other species like Panax quinquefolius or Panax notoginseng.
Detection of Adulteration: Identifying added fillers or cheaper Panax species.
Chemotaxonomy: Classifying ginseng varieties based on their unique ginsenoside profiles.
Example: LC-MS fingerprints display multiple ginsenoside peaks (e.g., Rb1, Rg1, Re), providing a comprehensive chemical profile for quality control and regulatory compliance.[22]
3. Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha)
Background: Ashwagandha is a widely used adaptogen in Ayurvedic medicine. Its major bioactive compounds are withanolides, a group of steroidal lactones.
Techniques Used: HPTLC is commonly used to visualize withanolide fingerprints.
Applications:
Authentication: Confirming plant material identity and distinguishing from morphologically similar species.
Standardization: Ensuring consistent levels of withanolides in root extracts or herbal formulations.
Batch Consistency: Monitoring variation in herbal products from different suppliers or harvests.
Example: HPTLC plates reveal several bands corresponding to major withanolides (e.g., withaferin A, withanolide D), which can be quantified using densitometry for standardization purposes.[23]
4. Aloe vera
Background: Aloe vera is valued for its wound healing, anti-inflammatory, and gastrointestinal benefits. Its bioactive constituents include anthraquinones, polysaccharides, and glycoproteins.
Techniques Used: GC-MS and HPLC are used to profile volatile and non-volatile components.
Applications:
Chemical Profiling: Detecting anthraquinones like aloin and aloe-emodin, which contribute to laxative and antimicrobial effects.
Authenticity Check: Ensuring that Aloe gel or powder is not adulterated with fillers.
Shelf-Life Assessment: Monitoring degradation of sensitive polysaccharides over time.
Example: GC-MS analysis provides a detailed profile of volatile anthraquinones, while HPLC can quantify polysaccharides and glycoproteins, forming a comprehensive fingerprint.[24]
5. Polyherbal Formulations
Background: Traditional medicines like Ayurvedic churnas or Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) decoctions often contain multiple herbs with dozens of bioactive compounds.
Techniques Used: Multi-marker HPLC, HPTLC, LC-MS, and GC-MS are used in combination to generate holistic fingerprints. Chemometric analysis may be applied for pattern recognition and batch comparison.
Applications:
Multi-Marker Standardization: Ensures the presence of key bioactives from each constituent herb.
Batch-to-Batch Consistency: Detects variations in complex formulations and confirms compliance with pharmacopoeial standards.
Adulteration Detection: Identifies missing or substituted herbs.
Example: An Ayurvedic churna containing turmeric, ginseng, and ashwagandha can be analyzed by HPLC to confirm curcuminoids, ginsenosides, and withanolides simultaneously. LC-MS can detect minor components and verify overall chemical integrity.[25]
6. Key Insights from Case Studies
Technique Selection Depends on Target Compounds: TLC/HPTLC for preliminary checks, HPLC/UPLC for quantitative analysis, GC/GC-MS for volatiles, and LC-MS/UPLC-QTOF-MS for detailed metabolomics.
Fingerprinting Is More Reliable Than Single-Marker Analysis: Many plants contain multiple bioactive compounds that act synergistically; focusing on a single marker may miss adulteration or degradation.
Supports Global Quality Standards: Regulatory bodies increasingly recommend fingerprinting as part of pharmacopoeial monographs and quality assurance protocols.
Enables Modernization of Traditional Medicine: Provides scientific validation for herbal medicines, bridging the gap between traditional knowledge and modern pharmaceutical practices.[26]
Advantages and Limitations of Chromatographic Fingerprinting in Medicinal Plants
Chromatographic fingerprinting has become an indispensable tool in the quality control and standardization of medicinal plants and herbal formulations. Like any analytical technique, it offers several advantages that make it highly suitable for herbal research, but it also has some limitations that must be considered when designing experiments or implementing quality control protocols.[27]
Regulatory Perspectives on Chromatographic Fingerprinting of Medicinal Plants
The increasing global use of herbal medicines has highlighted the need for robust quality control systems. Regulatory authorities around the world have recognized chromatographic fingerprinting as a reliable, scientific, and reproducible method to ensure the safety, efficacy, and authenticity of herbal products. Regulatory frameworks now emphasize the importance of fingerprints for standardization, authentication, and quality assurance.[28]
1. World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines
Background: WHO has published multiple guidelines on quality control of herbal medicines, including the seminal WHO Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Herbal Medicines (2011) and subsequent updates in 2023.
Key Recommendations:
Chromatographic fingerprinting should be used to assess chemical composition, authenticity, and batch consistency of medicinal plants and herbal formulations.
Both qualitative (pattern of peaks/bands) and quantitative (marker compound content) aspects should be considered.
Fingerprints should be included in pharmacopoeial monographs wherever possible.
Rationale: By using fingerprints, manufacturers and regulators can detect:
Substituted or adulterated plant materials
Batch-to-batch variability
Degraded or improperly processed herbs
Impact: WHO guidelines have driven global adoption of chromatographic fingerprinting as a standardized method for herbal quality control, promoting consumer safety and product consistency.[29]
2. Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP, 2022 Edition)
Background: The Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP) is the official compendium for drugs and herbal medicines in India. The 2022 edition places significant emphasis on modern analytical methods, including chromatographic fingerprints.
Key Highlights:
HPTLC, HPLC, and TLC fingerprints are mandatory for many herbal drugs such as turmeric, ashwagandha, ginseng, and giloy.
Fingerprints are used to confirm identity, ensure purity, and detect adulterants.
Multi-component herbal formulations are required to have multi-marker fingerprints covering key bioactive constituents.
Impact: The IP’s adoption of fingerprinting has strengthened standardization of Ayurvedic, Siddha, and Unani herbal medicines, ensuring global compliance and industrial scalability.[30]
3. Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP)
Background: The Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP) governs Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and has been a pioneer in incorporating modern analytical techniques.
Key Requirements:
HPLC fingerprints are mandatory for most TCM herbal drugs, especially those with multiple bioactive compounds.
Fingerprinting is used for authentication, quality assessment, and adulteration detection.
Chemometric and multi-marker approaches are encouraged for complex polyherbal decoctions.
Impact: ChP guidelines have ensured that TCM products meet consistent quality standards, which is crucial for both domestic consumption and export markets.[31]
4. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and European Medicines Agency (EMA)
USP Guidelines:
USP provides monographs for herbal products, often including chromatographic methods for quality evaluation and standardization.
Fingerprinting supports authentication, detection of adulterants, and verification of bioactive constituents.
EMA Recommendations:
EMA promotes the use of chemical fingerprints as part of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for herbal medicinal products.
Fingerprints are considered essential evidence for product consistency, safety, and efficacy during regulatory approval.
Global Impact: USP and EMA guidelines encourage international harmonization of herbal quality standards, facilitating trade and regulatory compliance across borders.
5. Key Benefits of Regulatory Acceptance
Standardization Across Borders: Fingerprints provide a common quality reference, ensuring that herbal products meet the same standards globally.
Consumer Safety: Detects adulteration, substitution, and contamination, reducing risks of toxicity or inefficacy.
Scientific Validation: Bridges traditional herbal knowledge with modern pharmacology, increasing acceptance in evidence-based medicine.
6. Challenges in Regulatory Implementation
Standardization of fingerprinting methods can be challenging due to:
Variability in plant sources (geography, season, cultivation practices)
Complexity of multi-herb formulations, requiring multi-marker approaches
Instrumental differences between laboratories, which may affect reproducibility
To overcome these, regulatory authorities encourage:
Detailed method validation protocols
Use of reference standards and authenticated plant materials
Adoption of chemometric tools for data interpretation [32]
Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Chromatographic Fingerprinting of Medicinal Plants
Chromatographic fingerprinting has evolved considerably over the last decade, moving from simple qualitative or quantitative analysis toward integrated, high-throughput, and data-driven approaches. Modern analytical science, combined with computational tools, is transforming the way medicinal plants are standardized, authenticated, and studied, offering new opportunities for both research and industry.
1. Chemometrics: Statistical Interpretation of Fingerprints
Background: Chromatographic fingerprints often generate complex datasets with dozens or hundreds of peaks. Interpreting these manually can be difficult and error-prone.
Chemometrics applies multivariate statistical methods to extract meaningful information from these datasets.
Key Techniques:
PCA (Principal Component Analysis): Reduces the dimensionality of data to identify patterns and similarities between samples.
HCA (Hierarchical Cluster Analysis): Groups samples based on chemical similarity, highlighting differences between species or batches.
PLS-DA (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis): Combines fingerprint data with classification models to predict sample identity or detect adulteration.
Applications:
Differentiating authentic vs. adulterated plant materials.
Classifying herbal products from different geographical origins.
Evaluating batch-to-batch consistency in industrial herbal formulations.
Example: PCA of HPLC fingerprints of ginseng can clearly separate Panax ginseng from Panax quinquefolius based on ginsenoside patterns.[33]
Background: Metabolomics is the systematic study of all metabolites (small molecules) in a plant. When combined with chromatographic techniques, it allows holistic chemical characterization.
Advances:
LC-MS, UPLC-QTOF-MS, and GC-MS generate high-resolution metabolic profiles.
Metabolomic fingerprinting provides a “chemical map” of all detectable compounds in a plant, including minor bioactives that contribute to therapeutic effects.
Applications:
Discovery of new bioactive compounds in medicinal plants.
Identification of chemical markers for authentication and quality control.
Studying plant-environment interactions and how cultivation or harvesting affects chemical composition.
Example: Metabolomic profiling of Curcuma longa using UPLC-QTOF-MS identifies curcuminoids, volatile compounds, and minor flavonoids, giving a comprehensive fingerprint.
3. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)
Background: AI and ML are increasingly used for pattern recognition and predictive modeling in chromatographic data.
Applications:
Automated fingerprint classification: ML models can distinguish between authentic and adulterated samples with high accuracy.
Prediction of bioactivity: Correlating fingerprint data with pharmacological outcomes to identify key active compounds.
Data Mining: Handling large-scale datasets from metabolomics or multi-herb formulations.
Techniques: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning are commonly applied.
Example: An AI model trained on LC-MS fingerprints of Ashwagandha can automatically identify withanolide-rich extracts and detect adulterated samples.[34]
4. Integration with DNA Barcoding
Background: DNA barcoding identifies plant species using short, standardized DNA sequences. While chromatographic fingerprinting analyzes chemical composition, DNA barcoding confirms genetic identity.
Advantages of Integration:
Chemical + Genetic Validation: Confirms both species identity and chemical quality.
Enhanced Detection of Adulteration: Some adulterants may be chemically similar but genetically different.
Support for Regulatory Compliance: Provides robust evidence for herbal authentication.
Applications:
Authentication of multi-herb formulations in Ayurveda or TCM.
Verifying geographic origin of medicinal plants.
Correlating genotype with chemotype to optimize cultivation and harvest.
Example: Combined DNA barcoding and HPLC fingerprinting of Panax ginseng ensures that the plant is authentic and contains the expected ginsenoside profile.
5. Future Perspectives
High-Throughput Fingerprinting: Automation and miniaturized chromatography will allow rapid screening of large herbal libraries.
Integration with Omics Approaches: Combining metabolomics, proteomics, and genomics will provide systems-level understanding of medicinal plants.
Predictive Quality Control: AI-driven models may predict efficacy, stability, and shelf-life based on fingerprint patterns.
Global Harmonization: Adoption of integrated chemical and genetic fingerprinting may set international standards for herbal medicines.
Sustainability and Traceability: Fingerprinting can help trace plant origin, ensuring sustainable harvesting and ethical sourcing.[35]
CONCLUSION
Chromatographic fingerprinting has emerged as a cornerstone of modern herbal medicine quality control, bridging the gap between traditional knowledge and contemporary scientific validation. Unlike conventional methods that rely on single-marker compounds, fingerprinting provides a holistic and reproducible chemical profile of medicinal plants and herbal formulations. This comprehensive approach ensures the authenticity, purity, and consistency of raw materials and finished products, safeguarding consumer health and supporting industrial standardization.
Through various techniques TLC/HPTLC, HPLC/UPLC, GC/GC-MS, and hyphenated methods like LC-MS fingerprinting enables researchers to detect adulteration, monitor batch-to-batch consistency, and study the stability of bioactive compounds. Case studies of widely used medicinal plants such as Curcuma longa (turmeric), Panax ginseng, Withania somnifera (ashwagandha), and Aloe vera, as well as polyherbal formulations, clearly demonstrate the practical applications and effectiveness of this approach in real-world scenarios.
The advantages of chromatographic fingerprinting—holistic analysis, reproducibility, regulatory acceptance, and versatility across complex herbal formulations—outweigh its limitations, which include the need for skilled personnel, sophisticated instrumentation, and careful consideration of environmental variability. Regulatory bodies worldwide, including WHO, Indian Pharmacopoeia, Chinese Pharmacopoeia, USP, and EMA, endorse fingerprinting as a mandatory tool for herbal drug standardization, ensuring that global herbal products meet strict safety and quality standards.
Recent advances, such as chemometrics, metabolomics, artificial intelligence, and integration with DNA barcoding, are revolutionizing the field, allowing high-throughput, data-driven, and highly accurate analysis. These innovations promise a future where herbal medicines are not only scientifically validated but also globally standardized, fostering trust, safety, and therapeutic efficacy.
In summary, chromatographic fingerprinting is not just a method for analysis; it is a reliable, adaptable, and forward-looking tool that underpins the quality assurance, authenticity, and modernization of medicinal plants and herbal formulations. Its continued development and integration with emerging technologies will play a pivotal role in the future of herbal medicine research, regulation, and industrial application.
REFERENCES
WHO. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
Market Research Future. Global Herbal Medicine Market Forecast to 2030. MRFR; 2022.
Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: Issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2020;10:123.
Li S, et al. Factors affecting the quality of herbal medicines. Phytochem Rev. 2018;17:659–679.
Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drugs: Challenges and approaches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34:113–125.
Tiwari P, et al. Herbal medicines: Regulatory status and quality concerns. Curr Drug Metab. 2017;18(14):1120–1130.
Li X, et al. Chromatographic fingerprinting of medicinal plants for quality assessment. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1250:1–15.
WHO. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
Chan K. Modern approaches for quality assessment of traditional Chinese medicines. Trends Anal Chem. 2011;30(5):586–595.
WHO. Guidelines on Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP) for Medicinal Plants. 2011, updated 2023.
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP) 2020 Edition.
Heinrich M, et al. Medicinal plants in Europe: Drug discovery and ethnopharmacology. Pharm Biol. 2004;42:3–17.
Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. 2nd ed. Springer; 1996.
Sethi PD. High Performance Liquid Chromatography: Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations. CBS Publishers; 2001.
Hopf C, et al. Mass spectrometry in herbal medicine research. Planta Med. 2019;85:682–697.
Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drugs: Challenges and approaches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34:113–125.
Chan K. Modern approaches for quality assessment of traditional Chinese medicines. Trends Anal Chem. 2011;30(5):586–595.
Tiwari P, et al. Chromatographic techniques in herbal drug standardization. Curr Drug Metab. 2017;18(14):1120–1130.
Goyal PK, et al. HPTLC fingerprinting of Withania somnifera roots. Phytochem Anal. 2007;18:186–190.
Jurenka JS. Therapeutic applications of curcumin. Altern Med Rev. 2009;14(2):141–153.
Sharma A, et al. GC-MS analysis of Mentha essential oils. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;4:1873–1879.
Singh P, et al. LC-MS fingerprinting of polyherbal formulations. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;164:170–178.
Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. 3rd Edition. Springer; 2011.
Kamboj VP. Herbal medicine: Current status and the future. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2000;1(2):46–49.
Sahoo DK, et al. Chromatographic fingerprinting of medicinal plants: Advances and applications. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(4):207–219.
Kumar D, et al. HPTLC and HPLC fingerprinting of Withania somnifera and its formulations. Phytochem Anal. 2012;23:142–150.
Aggarwal BB, et al. Curcumin: The Indian solid gold. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;595:1–75.
Sunil C, et al. GC-MS profiling of essential oils in Mentha species. J Essent Oil Bear Plants. 2014;17(5):1143–1152.
Zhao Y, et al. Chemical fingerprinting for authentication of traditional Chinese medicines. J Chromatogr B. 2011;879:2791–2811.
Sethi V, et al. Advances in chromatographic techniques for herbal drug standardization. Phytochem Rev. 2018;17:1297–1320.
World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Quality Control of Herbal Medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2011, 2023 update.
Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2022. Ghaziabad, India: IPC; 2022.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on quality of herbal medicinal products. EMA/HMPC/356/18; 2018.
United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Herbal Medicines and Dietary Supplements Monographs. USP 44-NF 39; 2021.
Gupta M, et al. Integration of chemometrics and chromatographic fingerprints for herbal standardization. Phytochem Anal. 2020;31:204–220.
Reference
WHO. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
Market Research Future. Global Herbal Medicine Market Forecast to 2030. MRFR; 2022.
Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: Issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2020;10:123.
Li S, et al. Factors affecting the quality of herbal medicines. Phytochem Rev. 2018;17:659–679.
Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drugs: Challenges and approaches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34:113–125.
Tiwari P, et al. Herbal medicines: Regulatory status and quality concerns. Curr Drug Metab. 2017;18(14):1120–1130.
Li X, et al. Chromatographic fingerprinting of medicinal plants for quality assessment. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1250:1–15.
WHO. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
Chan K. Modern approaches for quality assessment of traditional Chinese medicines. Trends Anal Chem. 2011;30(5):586–595.
WHO. Guidelines on Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP) for Medicinal Plants. 2011, updated 2023.
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP) 2020 Edition.
Heinrich M, et al. Medicinal plants in Europe: Drug discovery and ethnopharmacology. Pharm Biol. 2004;42:3–17.
Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. 2nd ed. Springer; 1996.
Sethi PD. High Performance Liquid Chromatography: Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations. CBS Publishers; 2001.
Hopf C, et al. Mass spectrometry in herbal medicine research. Planta Med. 2019;85:682–697.
Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drugs: Challenges and approaches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34:113–125.
Chan K. Modern approaches for quality assessment of traditional Chinese medicines. Trends Anal Chem. 2011;30(5):586–595.
Tiwari P, et al. Chromatographic techniques in herbal drug standardization. Curr Drug Metab. 2017;18(14):1120–1130.
Goyal PK, et al. HPTLC fingerprinting of Withania somnifera roots. Phytochem Anal. 2007;18:186–190.
Jurenka JS. Therapeutic applications of curcumin. Altern Med Rev. 2009;14(2):141–153.
Sharma A, et al. GC-MS analysis of Mentha essential oils. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;4:1873–1879.
Singh P, et al. LC-MS fingerprinting of polyherbal formulations. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;164:170–178.
Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. 3rd Edition. Springer; 2011.
Kamboj VP. Herbal medicine: Current status and the future. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2000;1(2):46–49.
Sahoo DK, et al. Chromatographic fingerprinting of medicinal plants: Advances and applications. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(4):207–219.
Kumar D, et al. HPTLC and HPLC fingerprinting of Withania somnifera and its formulations. Phytochem Anal. 2012;23:142–150.
Aggarwal BB, et al. Curcumin: The Indian solid gold. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;595:1–75.
Sunil C, et al. GC-MS profiling of essential oils in Mentha species. J Essent Oil Bear Plants. 2014;17(5):1143–1152.
Zhao Y, et al. Chemical fingerprinting for authentication of traditional Chinese medicines. J Chromatogr B. 2011;879:2791–2811.
Sethi V, et al. Advances in chromatographic techniques for herbal drug standardization. Phytochem Rev. 2018;17:1297–1320.
World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Quality Control of Herbal Medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2011, 2023 update.
Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2022. Ghaziabad, India: IPC; 2022.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on quality of herbal medicinal products. EMA/HMPC/356/18; 2018.
United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Herbal Medicines and Dietary Supplements Monographs. USP 44-NF 39; 2021.
Gupta M, et al. Integration of chemometrics and chromatographic fingerprints for herbal standardization. Phytochem Anal. 2020;31:204–220.
Neha Hande
Corresponding author
Shri Swami Samarth Institute of Pharmacy, Malwadi, Bota
10.5281/zenodo.17278513
