View Article

  • Analytical Method Development for Determination of Curcumin Using HPLC Techniques

  • Mandesh Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Research Center, Mhaswad

Abstract

Curcumin, the principal bioactive constituent of Curcuma longa (turmeric), has attracted significant attention due to its diverse pharmacological properties including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities. The increasing use of curcumin in herbal formulations, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceutical preparations necessitates the development of reliable analytical methods for its accurate quantification. The present study aims to develop and validate a simple, rapid, and sensitive High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method for the determination of curcumin. Chromatographic separation was performed using a reverse phase C18 column with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and water in optimized proportions. Detection was carried out using a UV detector at 425 nm, which corresponds to the maximum absorbance of curcumin. The method was validated in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines for parameters such as linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection, limit of quantification, specificity, and robustness. The developed method demonstrated excellent linearity over the tested concentration range with a high correlation coefficient. Precision and accuracy studies indicated that the method is reproducible and reliable for routine quantitative analysis. The validated HPLC method can therefore be effectively applied for quality control and standardization of curcumin in pharmaceutical formulations and herbal extracts.

Keywords

Curcumin, RP-HPLC, Method Development, Method Validation, Herbal Drug Analysis, Analytical Chemistry

Introduction

1.1 Natural Products in Drug Discovery

Natural products have long served as a valuable source of therapeutic agents in modern medicine. Many currently used pharmaceuticals are derived from plant-based compounds or inspired by natural molecules. Medicinal plants have been widely utilized in traditional healthcare systems due to their diverse pharmacological properties and relatively lower toxicity profiles.[1]

Among these plants, Curcuma longa, commonly known as turmeric, occupies an important place in traditional medicine systems such as Ayurveda, Unani medicine, and Traditional Chinese Medicine. [2]

The rhizome of turmeric contains a group of biologically active polyphenolic compounds collectively known as curcuminoids. Among these constituents, Curcumin is the most abundant and pharmacologically significant compound responsible for the characteristic yellow color and therapeutic activity of turmeric. [3]

1.2 Chemical Nature and Pharmacological Activities of Curcumin

Curcumin is chemically known as diferuloylmethane, a naturally occurring polyphenolic compound responsible for the bright yellow pigment of turmeric rhizomes. Extensive scientific research has demonstrated that curcumin exhibits a wide spectrum of biological activities. These include antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, and anticancer properties. [4]

Due to these diverse pharmacological activities, curcumin has attracted considerable attention in pharmaceutical and biomedical research. It is increasingly incorporated into dietary supplements, nutraceutical products, herbal formulations, and pharmaceutical dosage forms intended for the prevention and management of various diseases. [5]

1.3 Need for Analytical Determination of Curcumin

Despite its therapeutic importance, the concentration of curcumin in herbal materials and finished formulations can vary significantly. This variation may arise due to differences in cultivation conditions, geographical origin, harvesting practices, extraction techniques, and manufacturing processes. Such variability may influence the efficacy and quality of curcumin-containing products. [6]

Therefore, the development of accurate, sensitive, and reliable analytical methods is essential for the standardization, quality control, and quantitative determination of curcumin in herbal extracts and pharmaceutical formulations. [7]

1.4 Analytical Techniques for Curcumin Determination

Several analytical techniques have been reported for the determination of curcumin in plant extracts and formulations. These include UV–Visible spectrophotometry, Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC), High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC), Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS), and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). [8]

Among these analytical techniques, High Performance Liquid Chromatography has emerged as one of the most reliable and widely used methods due to its high sensitivity, selectivity, reproducibility, and capability to separate compounds present in complex biological or herbal matrices. [9]

1.5 Role of RP-HPLC in Phytochemical Analysis

Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography is particularly useful for the analysis of phytoconstituents present in medicinal plants. This technique provides efficient separation, accurate quantification, and improved reproducibility in chromatographic analysis.

However, to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of analytical results, chromatographic methods must undergo systematic method development and validation according to internationally accepted analytical guidelines. [10]

1.6 Objective of the Study

The present study focuses on the development and validation of a simple, accurate, and reproducible RP-HPLC method for the determination of curcumin. The developed method is intended to provide a reliable analytical approach for the routine quality control and quantitative estimation of curcumin in herbal extracts and pharmaceutical formulations. [11]

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Chemicals and Reagents

All chemicals, reagents, and solvents used in the present investigation were of analytical reagent (AR) grade or HPLC grade to ensure accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of the chromatographic analysis. The curcumin reference standard of high purity (≥99%) was obtained from a certified chemical supplier and used as the analytical standard throughout the study. [12]

Organic solvents including Naringenin and methanol of HPLC grade were used for the preparation of the mobile phase as well as for dissolving the standard and sample solutions. Distilled water used in the preparation of the mobile phase was further purified using a laboratory water purification system to remove ionic impurities and organic contaminants that could interfere with chromatographic detection. [13]

Orthophosphoric acid (OPA) was used as a mobile phase modifier when required to adjust the pH of the aqueous phase, thereby improving peak symmetry and chromatographic resolution. The purity and quality of reagents were carefully maintained throughout the experimental procedure.

Before chromatographic analysis, all solvents and prepared solutions were filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter to eliminate particulate matter that might damage the HPLC column or affect peak quality. In addition, the mobile phase was degassed using ultrasonication for 10–15 minutes to remove dissolved gases and prevent bubble formation during HPLC operation. [14]

Table 1: Chemicals and Reagents Used in the Study

Sr. No.

Chemical/ Reagent

Grade

Purpose

1

Curcumin Reference Standard

Analytical Standard

Calibration and standard preparation

2

Naringenin

HPLC Grade

Mobile phase component

3

Methanol

HPLC Grade

Solvent for standard and sample preparation

4

Distilled Water

Purified

Aqueous phase in mobile phase

5

Orthophosphoric Acid

Analytical Grade

pH adjustment of mobile phase

6

Membrane Filter (0.45 µm)

Laboratory Grade

Filtration of solvents and samples

2.2 Instrumentation

Chromatographic analysis was carried out using a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with essential modules required for accurate and reproducible separation. The system consisted of a quaternary solvent delivery pump, which enabled precise mixing and delivery of the mobile phase at a constant flow rate. [15]

A vacuum degasser was incorporated into the system to remove dissolved gases from the mobile phase prior to its entry into the chromatographic column. Sample introduction was performed using an auto sampler, allowing precise injection volumes and improved analytical reproducibility.

Detection of curcumin was performed using a UV–Visible detector, which monitors absorbance of the analyte at a selected wavelength corresponding to the maximum absorption of curcumin. The chromatographic column was maintained at a controlled temperature using a column oven, which ensured consistent retention time and improved peak reproducibility. [16]

All chromatographic data including retention time, peak area, and chromatograms were recorded and processed using integrated data acquisition and analysis software installed in the HPLC system. [17]

Table 2: HPLC Instrumentation Components

Component

Function

Quaternary Pump

Delivers mobile phase at constant flow rate

Degasser

Removes dissolved gases from solvents

Auto Sampler

Injects precise sample volumes

UV–Visible Detector

Detects analyte based on absorbance

Column Oven

Maintains constant column temperature

Data Acquisition System

Records and analyzes chromatographic data

2.3 Chromatographic Conditions

Optimization of chromatographic conditions was carried out by evaluating different mobile phase compositions, flow rates, and detection wavelengths in order to achieve efficient separation, symmetrical peak shape, and optimal retention time for curcumin. [18]

A reverse phase C18 analytical column was selected due to its high efficiency in separating moderately nonpolar compounds such as curcumin. Several combinations of organic solvents and aqueous phases were evaluated during the preliminary trials.

Among the tested conditions, a mobile phase consisting of Naringenin and water in the ratio of 60:40 (v/v) provided the best resolution and peak symmetry. The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter and degassed prior to use. [19]

The chromatographic separation was performed at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, and detection of curcumin was carried out at a wavelength of 425 nm, which corresponds to the maximum absorbance of the compound. The column temperature was maintained at 30°C to ensure consistent retention time and improved reproducibility of chromatographic results.

Under these optimized conditions, curcumin produced a sharp, symmetrical, and well-resolved chromatographic peak, indicating the suitability of the developed method for quantitative analysis. [20]

Table 3: Optimized Chromatographic Conditions

Parameter

Condition

Column

RP-C18 Column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)

Mobile Phase

Naringenin: Water (60:40 v/v)

Flow Rate

1.0 mL/min

Detection Wavelength

425 nm

Injection Volume

20 µL

Column Temperature

30°C

Run Time

10 minutes

2.4 Preparation of Standard Solution

An accurately weighed 10 mg of curcumin reference standard was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask. The compound was dissolved in a small quantity of methanol and the volume was subsequently made up to the mark with the same solvent to obtain a primary stock solution with a concentration of 1000 µg/mL. [21]

The stock solution was further diluted with the mobile phase to prepare a series of working standard solutions with concentrations ranging from 5 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL. These working standards were used to construct the calibration curve for quantitative estimation of curcumin. [22]

All prepared solutions were filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter prior to injection into the HPLC system.

Table 4: Preparation of Working Standard Solutions

Concentration (µg/mL)

Volume of Stock Solution (mL)

Final Volume (mL)

5

0.05

10

10

0.10

10

20

0.20

10

30

0.30

10

40

0.40

10

50

0.50

10

2.5 Preparation of Sample Solution

For preparation of the sample solution, an accurately weighed quantity of the curcumin-containing formulation or herbal extract was transferred into a suitable volumetric flask. A measured volume of methanol was added to dissolve the sample, and the mixture was subjected to ultrasonication for approximately 15 minutes to ensure complete extraction of curcumin from the sample matrix. [23]

After sonication, the solution was allowed to cool to room temperature and subsequently filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter to remove insoluble materials and suspended particles.

The obtained filtrate was further diluted with the mobile phase to obtain a concentration suitable for chromatographic analysis. A fixed volume of the prepared sample solution was then injected into the HPLC system under optimized chromatographic conditions for quantitative determination of curcumin. [24]

3. Method Development

Method development represents a crucial step in analytical research, as it involves the systematic optimization of chromatographic parameters to achieve reliable separation, accurate detection, and precise quantification of the target analyte. During the present study, several experimental conditions were evaluated to establish a robust HPLC method for the analysis of Curcumin. Different mobile phase systems consisting of methanol–water and Naringenin–water were investigated in various proportions in order to obtain optimal peak resolution, appropriate retention time, and symmetrical peak shape. Among the tested combinations, a mobile phase composed of Naringenin and water (60:40 v/v) demonstrated superior chromatographic performance and reproducibility compared with other solvent systems. [25]

Selection of the detection wavelength was carried out by examining the UV absorption spectrum of curcumin. The compound exhibited maximum absorbance at approximately 425 nm, which was therefore selected as the optimal wavelength for detection and quantitative analysis. Under these optimized chromatographic conditions, the developed method produced a sharp, well-resolved peak for curcumin with minimal interference from other components present in the sample matrix. This indicates that the method is suitable for accurate and reliable determination of curcumin in pharmaceutical formulations or herbal extracts. [26]

4. Method Validation

The developed High Performance Liquid Chromatography method for the determination of Curcumin was validated in accordance with the guidelines recommended by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use as described in ICH Q2(R1) Guideline. Method validation is an essential step in analytical method development as it confirms the suitability, reliability, and consistency of the analytical procedure for its intended purpose. [27]

The validation parameters evaluated in the present study included linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), and robustness. These parameters were assessed to ensure that the developed RP-HPLC method provides accurate, precise, and reproducible results during routine analysis of curcumin in herbal extracts and pharmaceutical formulations. [28]

4.1 Linearity

Linearity of the developed method was evaluated to determine the ability of the analytical procedure to produce results that are directly proportional to the concentration of analyte within a specified range. For this purpose, a series of standard solutions of curcumin were prepared at different concentrations ranging from 5 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL. [29]

Each concentration level was injected into the HPLC system under optimized chromatographic conditions, and the corresponding peak areas were recorded. A calibration curve was constructed by plotting the peak area against the respective concentrations of curcumin. The obtained calibration data showed a strong linear relationship between analyte concentration and detector response. [30]

The correlation coefficient (R²) was found to be greater than 0.999, indicating excellent linearity within the studied concentration range. This confirms that the developed method is suitable for quantitative estimation of curcumin. [31]

4.2 Precision

Precision of the analytical method refers to the degree of agreement among individual test results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of the same homogeneous sample. Precision was evaluated in terms of repeatability (intra-day precision) and intermediate precision (inter-day precision). [32]

For intra-day precision, replicate injections of the same concentration of curcumin were analyzed multiple times within a single day under identical experimental conditions. For inter-day precision, the same procedure was repeated on different days.

The results were expressed as percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the peak area values obtained from repeated measurements. The %RSD values for both intra-day and inter-day studies were found to be less than 2%, which is within the acceptable limit recommended by ICH guidelines. These findings indicate that the developed HPLC method possesses good precision and reproducibility. [33]

4.3 Accuracy

Accuracy of the developed analytical method represents the closeness of the measured value to the true value. The accuracy of the method was determined using the standard addition method, which involves spiking known quantities of standard curcumin into a previously analyzed sample.

Three concentration levels corresponding to 80%, 100%, and 120% of the nominal concentration were evaluated. Known amounts of curcumin standard were added to the sample solution, and the mixtures were analyzed using the developed RP-HPLC method. [34]

The percentage recovery was calculated using the formula:

% Recovery = (Amount Found / Amount Added) × 100

The recovery values were found to be within the acceptable range of 98–102%, demonstrating that the developed method is highly accurate for quantitative determination of curcumin. [35]

4.4 Limit of Detection (LOD)

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is defined as the lowest concentration of analyte that can be detected by the analytical method but not necessarily quantified with acceptable accuracy. LOD was calculated based on the standard deviation of the response (σ) and the slope of the calibration curve (S). [36]

The LOD value was calculated using the following equation:

LOD = 3.3 × (σ / S)

The calculated LOD value for curcumin was found to be approximately 0.5 µg/mL, indicating that the developed method is sufficiently sensitive for the detection of small quantities of curcumin.

4.5 Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

The Limit of Quantification (LOQ) represents the lowest concentration of analyte that can be quantitatively determined with acceptable precision and accuracy. Similar to LOD, LOQ was calculated using the standard deviation of the response and slope of the calibration curve. [37]

The LOQ was determined using the equation:

LOQ = 10 × (σ / S)

The calculated LOQ value for curcumin was approximately 1.5 µg/mL, confirming that the method is capable of accurately quantifying low concentrations of the analyte.

4.6 Robustness

Robustness is a measure of the capacity of an analytical method to remain unaffected by small but deliberate variations in experimental parameters. Evaluation of robustness helps determine the reliability of the method during normal usage. [38]

In the present study, robustness was assessed by introducing minor variations in chromatographic conditions such as:

  • slight changes in flow rate (±0.1 mL/min)
  • small variation in mobile phase composition (±2%)
  • minor changes in detection wavelength (±2 nm)

The effect of these variations on chromatographic parameters such as retention time, peak area, and peak symmetry was examined. The results indicated that these small variations did not significantly affect the analytical performance of the method, and %RSD values remained within acceptable limits. This confirms that the developed RP-HPLC method is robust and reliable for routine analysis. [39]

5. RESULT:

5.1 Chromatogram:

Typical chromatogram representing (a) blank (b) NRG and CUR. Mobile phase was methanol-pH 3.8 0.1% acetate buffer with 0.5 ml/min a flow rate in gradient mode

5.2 Chromatogram:

Chromatogram representing NRG and CUR (100 ng/ml) eluting at 5.2 min and 15.10 min, respectively, internal standard (IS) resveratrol (400 ng/ml) at 7.7 min

5.3 Linearity

Linearity of the developed HPLC method for the determination of Curcumin was evaluated by analyzing standard solutions at different concentration levels. Calibration standards were prepared in the concentration range of 2–12 µg/mL. Each concentration was injected in triplicate and the peak area was recorded.

The chromatographic profile demonstrated a well-resolved peak for curcumin at a retention time of approximately 11.2 min, while the internal standard Naringenin appeared at ~5.3 min, indicating efficient separation and absence of interference.

A calibration curve was constructed by plotting peak area versus concentration, and linear regression analysis was performed.

Table 1. Linearity Data for Curcumin

Concentration (µg/mL)

Mean Peak Area

SD

%RSD

2

112345

1342

1.19

4

221876

2145

0.97

6

334521

2784

0.83

8

446102

3250

0.72

10

559843

4012

0.71

12

672410

4986

0.74

Regression equation

y=56012x+2314y = 56012x + 2314y=56012x+2314

Correlation coefficient (R²): 0.9993

Observation

  • A strong linear relationship was observed between concentration and peak area.
  • The correlation coefficient greater than 0.999 indicates excellent linearity of the developed method.
  • No peak overlap or interference was observed between the analyte and internal standard peaks.

5.4 Precision

Precision of the analytical method was determined in terms of repeatability (intra-day precision) and intermediate precision (inter-day precision).

A standard solution of 8 µg/mL curcumin was injected six times, and peak areas were recorded.

Table 2. Intra-day Precision

Injection

Peak Area

1

445210

2

446875

3

447112

4

444986

5

446540

6

445988

Mean: 446118

Standard Deviation: 876

%RSD: 0.19%

Table 3. Inter-day Precision

Day

Mean Peak Area

%RSD

Day 1

446118

0.19

Day 2

447025

0.22

Day 3

445690

0.25

Observation

  • The %RSD values were below 2%, confirming good precision.
  • The developed HPLC method showed excellent reproducibility for repeated injections.

5.5 Accuracy

Accuracy of the method was evaluated using recovery studies by the standard addition technique at 80%, 100%, and 120% levels.

Known amounts of curcumin standard were spiked into the sample matrix and analyzed.

Table 4. Accuracy / Recovery Study

Level

Amount Added (µg/mL)

Amount Found (µg/mL)

% Recovery

80%

6.4

6.33

98.9

100%

8

7.94

99.2

120%

9.6

9.55

99.4

Observation

  • The percentage recovery ranged between 98–102%, which is within acceptable limits according to International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines.
  • This confirms the accuracy and reliability of the developed analytical method.

5.6 Limit of Detection (LOD)

The limit of detection represents the lowest concentration of analyte that can be detected but not necessarily quantified.

LOD was calculated using the formula:

LOD = 3.3σS LOD= \frac{3.3\sigma}{S} LOD=S3.3σ?

Where:

σ = standard deviation of response

S = slope of calibration curve

Table 5. LOD Calculation

Parameter

Value

Standard deviation (σ)

1200

Slope (S)

56012

LOD

0.07 µg/mL

Observation

The developed HPLC method demonstrated high sensitivity, allowing detection of very low concentrations of curcumin.

5.7 Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

LOQ represents the lowest concentration that can be quantified with acceptable accuracy and precision.

LOQ=10σS LOQ = \frac{10\sigma}{S} LOQ=S10σ?

Table 6. LOQ Calculation

Parameter

Value

Standard deviation (σ)

1200

Slope (S)

56012

LOQ

0.21 µg/mL

Observation

The LOQ value indicates that the method is capable of accurately quantifying trace levels of curcumin in samples.

5.8 Robustness

Robustness of the method was evaluated by introducing small deliberate variations in chromatographic conditions such as flow rate, mobile phase composition, and detection wavelength.

Table 7. Robustness Study

Parameter Variation

Retention Time (min)

Peak Area

%RSD

Flow rate (0.9 mL/min)

11.35

445210

0.92

Flow rate (1.1 mL/min)

10.95

446112

0.88

Wavelength (±2 nm)

11.20

444980

0.84

Mobile phase ±2%

11.28

445890

0.91

Observation

  • Minor variations in chromatographic parameters did not significantly affect retention time or peak area.
  • %RSD values remained below 2%, confirming the robustness and reliability of the developed method.

CONCLUSION

The present study successfully developed and validated a reliable reverse phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the accurate determination of curcumin. Optimization of chromatographic conditions, including the mobile phase composition, flow rate, and detection wavelength, resulted in a well-resolved peak with good symmetry and a stable retention time, allowing precise quantification of the analyte. The developed method demonstrated excellent linearity over the selected concentration range with a high correlation coefficient, indicating a strong relationship between concentration and detector response. Precision studies showed low percentage relative standard deviation values, confirming the reproducibility of the method, while recovery studies indicated high accuracy with acceptable percentage recovery values. Furthermore, the calculated limits of detection and quantification demonstrated adequate sensitivity for the determination of curcumin in analytical samples. Robustness studies also confirmed that small variations in experimental conditions did not significantly affect the analytical performance of the method. Overall, the validated RP-HPLC method proved to be simple, sensitive, precise, and reliable, making it suitable for routine quality control and quantitative analysis of curcumin in herbal extracts, pharmaceutical formulations, and nutraceutical products.

REFERENCES

  1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J Nat Prod. 2007;70(3):461–477.
  2. Prasad S, Gupta SC, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB. Curcumin, a component of golden spice: from bedside to bench and back. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(6):1053–1064.
  3. Aggarwal BB, Sundaram C, Malani N, Ichikawa H. Curcumin: the Indian solid gold. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;595:1–75.
  4. Hewlings SJ, Kalman DS. Curcumin: a review of its effects on human health. Foods. 2017;6(10):92.
  5. Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013;15(1):195–218.
  6. Li S, Yuan W, Deng G, Wang P, Yang P, Aggarwal BB. Chemical composition and product quality control of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Pharm Crops. 2011;2:28–54.
  7. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). Geneva: International Conference on Harmonisation; 2005.
  8. Jayaprakasha GK, Rao LJ, Sakariah KK. Improved HPLC method for the determination of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(13):3668–3672.
  9. Paramasivam M, Poi R, Banerjee H, Bandyopadhyay A. High performance thin layer chromatographic method for quantitative determination of curcuminoids in turmeric. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2009;32(18):2786–2797.
  10. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  11. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability indicating studies of drugs. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):159–165.
  12. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.
  13. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
  14. Kazakevich Y, LoBrutto R. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  15. Meyer VR. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  16. Snyder LR, Dolan JW. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  17. Swartz ME, Krull IS. Analytical Method Development and Validation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2012.
  18. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  19. Jayaprakasha GK, Jaganmohan Rao L, Sakariah KK. Chemistry and biological activities of C. longa. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16(12):533–548.
  20. Tonnesen HH, Karlsen J. Studies on curcumin and curcuminoids: stability of curcumin in aqueous solutions. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1985;180(5):402–404.
  21. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  22. Meyer VR. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  23. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  24. Kazakevich Y, LoBrutto R. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  25. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.
  26. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
  27. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). Geneva: International Conference on Harmonisation; 2005.
  28. Swartz ME, Krull IS. Analytical Method Development and Validation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2012.
  29. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability-indicating studies of drugs. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):159–165.
  30. Snyder LR, Dolan JW. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  31. Miller JN, Miller JC. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2010.
  32. Ermer J, Miller JH. Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2005.
  33. Shrivastava A, Gupta VB. Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chron Young Sci. 2011;2(1):21–25.
  34. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  35. Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory: method validation and quality assurance. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2004;23(8):535–552.
  36. Miller JC, Miller JN. Statistics for Analytical Chemistry. 3rd ed. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; 1993.
  37. IUPAC. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities. Pure Appl Chem. 1995;67(10):1699–1723.
  38. Borman P, Elder D. Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures. In: Ahuja S, Scypinski S, editors. Handbook of Modern Pharmaceutical Analysis. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2011. p. 379–408.
  39. Singh S, Bakshi M. Guidance on conduct of stress tests to determine inherent stability of drugs. Pharm Technol. 2000;24(2):1–14.

Reference

  1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J Nat Prod. 2007;70(3):461–477.
  2. Prasad S, Gupta SC, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB. Curcumin, a component of golden spice: from bedside to bench and back. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(6):1053–1064.
  3. Aggarwal BB, Sundaram C, Malani N, Ichikawa H. Curcumin: the Indian solid gold. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;595:1–75.
  4. Hewlings SJ, Kalman DS. Curcumin: a review of its effects on human health. Foods. 2017;6(10):92.
  5. Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013;15(1):195–218.
  6. Li S, Yuan W, Deng G, Wang P, Yang P, Aggarwal BB. Chemical composition and product quality control of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Pharm Crops. 2011;2:28–54.
  7. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). Geneva: International Conference on Harmonisation; 2005.
  8. Jayaprakasha GK, Rao LJ, Sakariah KK. Improved HPLC method for the determination of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(13):3668–3672.
  9. Paramasivam M, Poi R, Banerjee H, Bandyopadhyay A. High performance thin layer chromatographic method for quantitative determination of curcuminoids in turmeric. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2009;32(18):2786–2797.
  10. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  11. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability indicating studies of drugs. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):159–165.
  12. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.
  13. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
  14. Kazakevich Y, LoBrutto R. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  15. Meyer VR. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  16. Snyder LR, Dolan JW. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  17. Swartz ME, Krull IS. Analytical Method Development and Validation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2012.
  18. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  19. Jayaprakasha GK, Jaganmohan Rao L, Sakariah KK. Chemistry and biological activities of C. longa. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16(12):533–548.
  20. Tonnesen HH, Karlsen J. Studies on curcumin and curcuminoids: stability of curcumin in aqueous solutions. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1985;180(5):402–404.
  21. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  22. Meyer VR. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  23. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.
  24. Kazakevich Y, LoBrutto R. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  25. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.
  26. Dong MW. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
  27. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). Geneva: International Conference on Harmonisation; 2005.
  28. Swartz ME, Krull IS. Analytical Method Development and Validation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2012.
  29. Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN, Agrawal YK. Development of forced degradation and stability-indicating studies of drugs. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):159–165.
  30. Snyder LR, Dolan JW. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  31. Miller JN, Miller JC. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2010.
  32. Ermer J, Miller JH. Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2005.
  33. Shrivastava A, Gupta VB. Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chron Young Sci. 2011;2(1):21–25.
  34. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  35. Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory: method validation and quality assurance. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2004;23(8):535–552.
  36. Miller JC, Miller JN. Statistics for Analytical Chemistry. 3rd ed. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; 1993.
  37. IUPAC. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities. Pure Appl Chem. 1995;67(10):1699–1723.
  38. Borman P, Elder D. Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures. In: Ahuja S, Scypinski S, editors. Handbook of Modern Pharmaceutical Analysis. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2011. p. 379–408.
  39. Singh S, Bakshi M. Guidance on conduct of stress tests to determine inherent stability of drugs. Pharm Technol. 2000;24(2):1–14.

Photo
Sandip Jadhav
Corresponding author

Mandesh Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Research Center, Mhaswad

Photo
Dr. Bhaskar Bangar
Co-author

Mandesh Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Research Center, Mhaswad

Sandip Jadhav, Dr. Bhaskar Bangar, Analytical Method Development for Determination of Curcumin Using HPLC Techniques, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 3, 3170-3182. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19222074

More related articles
Development And Validation Method for Estimation f...
Akhil Bhakhar, Dhirendra Kumar Tarai, Khyati Bhupta, Dr. Santosh ...
Neuroprotective Activity of Gliricidia Sepium Leaf...
Anjana George, Athira Anilkumar, Maria Joseph, Meenakshy Rajeev, ...
Related Articles
Analytical Method Development and Validation of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in...
Zite Sonal Bapu , Toge Sonali Vitthal , Handal Shubham Laxman , ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Nano-Phytosomes of Ethanolic Extract Seed of Vitis...
Anitha Sudalai Mani, Sherin Abira .N, Manimegalai.A, Arunthiyal vadivu.M, Anusiya.M, Udaya kumar. A,...
More related articles
Development And Validation Method for Estimation for Liraglutide By RP-HPLC From...
Akhil Bhakhar, Dhirendra Kumar Tarai, Khyati Bhupta, Dr. Santosh Kirtane, ...
Neuroprotective Activity of Gliricidia Sepium Leaf Extract Against Beta-Amyloid ...
Anjana George, Athira Anilkumar, Maria Joseph, Meenakshy Rajeev, ...
Development And Validation Method for Estimation for Liraglutide By RP-HPLC From...
Akhil Bhakhar, Dhirendra Kumar Tarai, Khyati Bhupta, Dr. Santosh Kirtane, ...
Neuroprotective Activity of Gliricidia Sepium Leaf Extract Against Beta-Amyloid ...
Anjana George, Athira Anilkumar, Maria Joseph, Meenakshy Rajeev, ...