View Article

Abstract

Vicia faba seeds are known to contain Levodopa (L-DOPA), a therapeutic precursor used in Parkinson’s disease. This study reports the development and validation of a simple, rapid, and sensitive RP-HPLC method for quantitative estimation of L-DOPA in methanolic extracts of Vicia faba. Separation was achieved on a C18 column using methanol:0.5?etic acid (70:30, v/v) at 1.2 mL/min with detection at 284 nm. The method exhibited excellent linearity (10–500 µg/mL, r² = 0.9999), high accuracy (98.57%–99.46%), and good precision (%RSD < 2.6%). Sensitivity parameters were strong with LOD 0.690 µg/mL and LOQ 2.092 µg/mL. System suitability parameters met USP criteria, confirming robust chromatographic performance. The method is practical for routine QC, herbal standardization, and phytopharmaceutical development involving Vicia faba.

Keywords

Levodopa, Vicia faba, RP-HPLC, Validation, ICH Q2(R1)

Introduction

Herbal medicines continue to play a significant role in modern healthcare, serving as sources of pharmacologically active compounds [1,2]. Levodopa (L-DOPA) is an essential precursor for dopamine synthesis and remains the first-line treatment for Parkinson’s disease [3].

While Mucuna pruriens has been extensively studied for its high L-DOPA content, Vicia faba (broad bean) also contains physiologically relevant concentrations of L-DOPA and is consumed traditionally for neurological benefits [4–6]. Accurate quantification of L-DOPA in Vicia faba is crucial for herbal standardization, QC testing, and phytopharmaceutical applications [7].

HPLC is considered the most reliable tool for L-DOPA analysis due to its sensitivity, precision, and specificity [8]. However, existing methods largely target Mucuna pruriens and often involve long run times, complex buffers, or incomplete validation [9–11]. Very few reports present a rapid, fully validated RP-HPLC method specifically optimized for Vicia faba seed extracts.

Gap Statement
A simple, cost-effective, rapid, and fully ICH-validated RP-HPLC method exclusively for Vicia faba seed extract is not adequately reported in literature.

Objective
To develop and validate an RP-HPLC method for estimation of Levodopa in methanolic extract of Vicia faba seeds as per ICH Q2(R1) guidelines.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Chemicals and Reagents

Levodopa standard (Torrent Pharmaceuticals, India), HPLC-grade methanol, acetic acid, 0.1 M HCl, and Milli-Q water were used.

2.2 Plant Material

Vicia faba seeds were collected locally (Gurugram, Haryana) and authenticated by a qualified botanist, and a laboratory sample was preserved for reference.

2.3 Extraction Procedure

50 g seed powder was Soxhlet-extracted with methanol for 9 h. Filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure at 40–45°C and stored at 4°C.

2.4 Standard Preparation

100 mg Levodopa was dissolved in 0.1 M HCl and diluted to 100 mL (1 mg/mL stock). Working standards (10–500 µg/mL) were prepared by serial dilutions.

2.5 Sample Preparation

350 mg extract was mixed with 25 mL 0.1 M HCl, sonicated (60 min), filtered, and diluted to 100 mL. Final solution was filtered (0.45 µm).

2.6 Chromatographic Conditions

Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC with UV detector; Eurosphere C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm).

  • Mobile phase: Methanol : 0.5% acetic acid (70:30, v/v)
  • Flow rate: 1.2 mL/min
  • λmax: 284 nm
  • Injection volume: 20 µL
  • Column temp: 30°C
  • Run time: 5 min

2.7 Method Validation (ICH Q2 R1)

Validation included λmax determination, linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD/LOQ, and system suitability.

3. RESULTS

3.1 UV Absorption Maximum (λmax)

Levodopa exhibited λmax at 284 nm.

Figure 1. UV absorption scan of Levodopa showing a maximum absorbance (λmax) at approximately 284 nm.

3.2 Chromatogram of Standard Levodopa

Figure 2. RP-HPLC chromatogram of Levodopa reference standard showing a sharp peak at approximately 2.06 minutes under the optimized conditions.

3.3 Chromatogram of Vicia faba Extract

Figure 3. RP-HPLC chromatogram of methanolic extract of Vicia faba seeds showing the Levodopa peak at approximately 2.62 minutes.

3.4 Linearity

Linearity (10–500 µg/mL) showed r² = 0.9999.

Figure 4. Calibration curve of Levodopa (10–500 µg/mL) showing excellent linearity with regression equation y = 78592.0204x + 129058 (R² = 0.9986).

Table 1. Linearity data of Levodopa showing the mean peak area obtained at different concentrations (10–500 µg/mL). The calibration curve demonstrated excellent linearity with regression equation y = 45725x + 9566.505 and correlation coefficient (r²) = 0.9999.

Conc. (µg/mL)

Inj-1

Inj-2

Inj-3

10

113313

108112

109944

50

738942

715202

767530

100

1444560

1426635

1445756

250

3922595

3800596

4025756

500

7684255

7760000

7758283

3.5 Accuracy

Table 2. Accuracy results of Levodopa determined by recovery studies at three concentration levels (80%, 100%, and 120%), showing percent recovery within the acceptable range of 98–102%, confirming the accuracy of the developed method.

Level

Amount (mg)

% Recovery

80%

8

98.57

100%

10

99.46

120%

12

98.89

Recoveries: 98.57% – 99.46%.
3.6 Precision

Intra-day %RSD = 2.547%; Inter-day %RSD = 1.10%.

3.7 LOD/LOQ

LOD = 0.690 µg/mL; LOQ = 2.092 µg/mL.

3.8 System Suitability

Table 3. System suitability parameters for the optimized RP-HPLC method, including theoretical plates (N), tailing factor, and capacity factor, all of which comply with USP acceptance criteria, confirming robust chromatographic performance.

Parameter

Result

Theoretical Plates

6549

Tailing Factor

1.48

Capacity Factor

1.05

4. DISCUSSION

The developed RP-HPLC method showed superior chromatographic efficiency with a retention time of ~2.0–2.6 min, much shorter than many reported methods for herbal L-DOPA sources [9,10]. The methanol–acetic acid mobile phase provided sharp peak shape, consistent with literature indicating acidic modifiers improve catecholamine separation [10].

Linearity (r² = 0.9999) and wide range (10–500 µg/mL) exceeded several earlier herbal studies [9,11]. Sensitivity parameters (LOD/LOQ) were excellent compared to buffer-based or electrochemical detection methods. Accuracy (~99%) and precision (%RSD < 2.6%) confirmed reliability per ICH Q2(R1). System suitability met USP criteria, validating chromatographic performance.

Overall, this work resolves limitations of earlier methods such as long run times, complex solvents, and incomplete validation, providing the first fully optimized RP-HPLC method specifically for Vicia faba seed extract.

5. NOVELTY OF THE METHOD

This is among the first rapid, sensitive, and fully validated RP-HPLC methods tailored exclusively for Vicia faba. The short run time, simple mobile phase, and strong validation metrics enhance applicability in routine QC laboratories.

6. CONCLUSION

A rapid, sensitive, and ICH-compliant RP-HPLC method for Levodopa quantification in Vicia faba was successfully developed. The method’s practical outcome is its suitability for routine industrial QC, herbal standardization, and phytopharmaceutical development. The approach fills a major analytical gap by providing a robust method specifically optimized for Vicia faba.

7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

8. ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Pataudi College of Pharmacy for laboratory facilities.

REFERENCES

  1. Manyam BV. Paralysis agitans and L-DOPA in ancient India. Phytother Res. 1995;9(1):1–6.
  2. Apaydin H, Ertan S. L-Dopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2000;23(5):252–258.
  3. Rai S, Kaur A, Singh J. Natural sources of L-DOPA. Adv Life Sci. 2013;2(2):65–70.
  4. Pandey MM, Tripathi YB. Standardization of herbal formulations. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2014;3(1):10–21.
  5. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.
  6. Verma R, Bhatia S, Khurana S. Quantification of L-DOPA in herbal extracts by HPLC. J Pharm Anal. 2012;2(1):55–60.
  7. Lin C, Tsai S, Wu J. Determination of L-DOPA by RP-HPLC. J Chromatogr Sci. 2008;46(3):227–232.
  8. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Q2(R1). 2005.
  9. Misra A, Wagner H. Extraction and quantification of L-DOPA from Mucuna pruriens seeds by HPLC. Planta Med. 2007;73(2):123–126.
  10. Nagakannan P, Shivasharan BD, Thippeswamy BS. Standardization and quantification of levodopa in herbal extracts. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010;48(2):129–133.
  11. Ghosal S, Dutta SK. Pharmacognostic evaluation and RP-HPLC analysis of L-DOPA in legumes. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;139(3):654–660.
  12. De Souza L, Schapoval EE. Determination of levodopa using reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J AOAC Int. 2000;83(4):720–725.
  13. Bhatt P, Singh S. Development and validation of analytical methods for phytochemicals. J Pharm Res. 2013;6(8):895–904.
  14. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Q2(R2). 2022.

Reference

  1. Manyam BV. Paralysis agitans and L-DOPA in ancient India. Phytother Res. 1995;9(1):1–6.
  2. Apaydin H, Ertan S. L-Dopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2000;23(5):252–258.
  3. Rai S, Kaur A, Singh J. Natural sources of L-DOPA. Adv Life Sci. 2013;2(2):65–70.
  4. Pandey MM, Tripathi YB. Standardization of herbal formulations. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2014;3(1):10–21.
  5. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.
  6. Verma R, Bhatia S, Khurana S. Quantification of L-DOPA in herbal extracts by HPLC. J Pharm Anal. 2012;2(1):55–60.
  7. Lin C, Tsai S, Wu J. Determination of L-DOPA by RP-HPLC. J Chromatogr Sci. 2008;46(3):227–232.
  8. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Q2(R1). 2005.
  9. Misra A, Wagner H. Extraction and quantification of L-DOPA from Mucuna pruriens seeds by HPLC. Planta Med. 2007;73(2):123–126.
  10. Nagakannan P, Shivasharan BD, Thippeswamy BS. Standardization and quantification of levodopa in herbal extracts. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010;48(2):129–133.
  11. Ghosal S, Dutta SK. Pharmacognostic evaluation and RP-HPLC analysis of L-DOPA in legumes. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;139(3):654–660.
  12. De Souza L, Schapoval EE. Determination of levodopa using reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J AOAC Int. 2000;83(4):720–725.
  13. Bhatt P, Singh S. Development and validation of analytical methods for phytochemicals. J Pharm Res. 2013;6(8):895–904.
  14. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Q2(R2). 2022.

Photo
Santosh Kumar
Corresponding author

Pataudi College of Pharmacy, Pataudi, Gurugram.

Photo
Mangal Singh
Co-author

Pataudi College of Pharmacy, Pataudi, Gurugram.

Photo
Sarita
Co-author

Pataudi College of Pharmacy, Pataudi, Gurugram.

Photo
Manjeet Singh Yadav
Co-author

Pataudi College of Pharmacy, Pataudi, Gurugram.

Santosh Kumar*, Mangal Singh, Sarita, Manjeet Singh Yadav, Development and Validation of an RP-HPLC Method for Quantification of Levodopa in Methanolic Extract of Vicia faba Seeds, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 12, 1760-1765 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17875682

More related articles
Method Development And Validation For Simultaneous...
Priti S. Sonawane, Poonam Varadhe, P. R. Patil , ...
Azithromycin: A Pharmaceutical Studies & Mechanism...
Hezam Saleh Mohammed Dhaifallah , ...
Metformin in Modern Medicine: A Comprehensive Revi...
Anwar Qamar Q. , Altamash Shaikh, Aaref Patel, ...
Cyclodextrins in Formulation Development: Complexation and Stability Enhance...
D. Sruthi , Dr. K Anie Vijetha , Deekshitha Reddy Padidham , ...
Review: Anticancer Activity Of Pyrazole...
Shaikh Sabiya khalil , Md.Rayees Ahmad, ...
Innovative and Alternative Approaches to Urticaria Management...
Krunal K. Detholia, Mukesh B. Jadeja, Umang R. Varia, Hitesh B. Katariya, Vidhi D. Panchal, Vishal B...
Related Articles
The Role of Ketamine in Acute and Chronic Pain – A Review of Therapeutic Benef...
Albin Johnson, J. S. Venkatesh, Dr. Santosh Uttangi, Akshara Jeevan, Aleena Fernandez, Mallikarjun H...
Green Synthesis of Quinoline and Its Derivatives...
Anand Bajaniya, Chauhan Aashish J., ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Lipstick...
Kashish Patel, Sayali Chede, Monika Badhekar, Shubham Gadge , ...
A Comprehensive Review on Transungual Drug Delivery: From Nail Anatomy to Treatm...
Monika Nijhawan, Samyuktha Kypa, Nandini Kongara, Bhavana Pappala, Rajeswari Aleti, Sailaja Gunnam, ...