View Article

Abstract

Hypertension continues to be a major contributor to cardiovascular diseases and deaths globally, impacting almost one billion people. While conventional oral treatments are effective, they face limitations such as poor bioavailability, short durations of action, and the necessity for frequent dosing. These factors lead to fluctuating plasma drug levels and decreased patient adherence to prescribed therapies. To address these challenges, Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) have been explored as a promising solution for the controlled and sustained administration of antihypertensive drugs. TDDS are non-invasive delivery systems that transport drugs through the skin into the bloodstream at a controlled pace. This method has several advantages, including the avoidance of first-pass metabolism in the liver, improved bioavailability, consistent plasma drug levels, and better patient adherence. Several antihypertensive medications, such as clonidine, metoprolol tartrate, atenolol, carvedilol, and nicardipine hydrochloride, have shown positive outcomes in both laboratory and clinical trials when administered transdermally. This review offers an in-depth look at the role of TDDS in treating hypertension. It covers the structure and function of transdermal patches, the necessary physicochemical properties for effective drug absorption, and the criteria used to assess their formulation. Furthermore, it highlights recent innovations, including microneedle patches, biodegradable systems, and smart patches that react to physiological changes. The potential of TDDS to transform hypertension management is substantial, especially for addressing long-term adherence and stable drug delivery in chronic treatment.

Keywords

Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS); Hypertension; Antihypertensive Drugs; Clonidine Patch; Skin Permeability; Controlled Drug Release; Patient Compliance; Microneedles; Smart Patches; Bioavailability; Permeation Enhancers; Matrix Patch; First-pass Metabolism; Drug Delivery Innovations.

Introduction

Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a persistent cardiovascular condition and a leading cause of global illness and death. Epidemiological studies show that hypertension is responsible for around 57% of stroke-related fatalities and 24% of deaths from coronary heart disease in India. The World Health Organization reports that over 1 billion people worldwide suffer from hypertension, leading to approximately 7.1 million deaths annually due to complications associated with uncontrolled blood pressure.
Managing hypertension typically requires long-term pharmacological treatment, including oral medications such as beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, and diuretics. However, oral drug delivery presents several challenges, including:
• First-pass metabolism in the liver, which decreases drug bioavailability.
• Frequent dosing, particularly for drugs with short half-lives.
• Fluctuating plasma drug levels, which can affect the efficacy of the treatment.
• Reduced patient adherence, especially among the elderly who may need to take multiple medications daily.
To overcome these limitations, Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) have emerged as an alternative. TDDS are adhesive patches applied to the skin that deliver medication steadily and at a controlled rate into the bloodstream. This method offers several benefits, such as:
• Avoiding gastrointestinal and hepatic first-pass metabolism.
• Extended therapeutic effects.
• Improved patient compliance due to less frequent dosing.
• Reduced side effects resulting from peak-trough fluctuations in drug levels.
Transdermal delivery is particularly advantageous for managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Clonidine was the first antihypertensive drug to be marketed as a transdermal patch (Catapres-TTS), setting the stage for further exploration of TDDS in cardiovascular treatments.
With the continued advancement of technologies like microneedle patches, biodegradable systems, and smart drug delivery platforms, TDDS are gaining increased attention. These innovations not only improve the efficiency of drug delivery but also offer the potential for responsive, programmable treatments that enhance patient outcomes. This review provides an in-depth analysis of TDDS in the context of antihypertensive therapy, addressing core principles, drug compatibility, formulation approaches, benefits, challenges, and future directions

3. Overview of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS)

3.1 Definition of TDDS

A Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS) is a compact, self-contained dosage form designed for application to intact skin, enabling the controlled transport of a drug into the bloodstream. This method bypasses the gastrointestinal system and avoids first-pass hepatic metabolism, thereby enhancing the bioavailability of drugs that have poor oral absorption.

3.2 Historical Background and Clinical Applications

While the idea of transdermal drug delivery has existed for a long time, major progress was made in the 1980s, notably with the approval of clonidine transdermal patches (Catapres-TTS) for hypertension treatment. Since then, many medications, particularly those used for long-term therapy, have been reformulated for transdermal delivery. At present, transdermal systems are available for a variety of drugs, including nicotine, fentanyl, nitroglycerin, estradiol, and antihypertensive agents like clonidine, bisoprolol, and timolol maleate.

3.3 Benefits of TDDS

TDDS offer several advantages over traditional oral or injectable drug delivery methods:

  • They bypass first-pass metabolism in the liver, improving drug bioavailability.
  • They provide a steady and consistent release of medication, helping to maintain stable plasma drug levels.
  • They require less frequent dosing, which enhances patient adherence to treatment plans.
  • They offer a safer profile by minimizing peak drug levels and related side effects.
  • They are non-invasive and can be easily discontinued if adverse reactions occur.

3.4 Limitations of TDDS

Despite their benefits, TDDS have certain limitations:

  • They are only suitable for drugs with specific physicochemical properties, typically small molecules (under 500 Da) that are moderately lipophilic and potent in low doses.
  • The stratum corneum, the skin's outermost layer, presents a major barrier to drug absorption.
  • Local skin reactions, such as irritation or allergic reactions at the application site, may occur.
  • Differences in skin permeability between individuals can affect drug absorption and treatment outcomes.
  • The production cost of TDDS tends to be higher compared to oral formulations.

These challenges emphasize the need for careful drug selection, effective formulation design, and the use of enhancement techniques such as chemical permeation enhancers, microneedles, and iontophoresis to optimize transdermal drug delivery performance.

4. Skin as a Barrier to Drug Delivery

The skin acts as the body’s foremost defense against environmental factors, and while it also provides a pathway for drug administration in transdermal systems, its complex structure—particularly the stratum corneum—poses a significant challenge for drug absorption.

4.1 Structure and Composition of the Skin

The skin is made up of three primary layers:

  • Epidermis: The outermost layer, which includes the stratum corneum.
  • Dermis: The middle layer, containing connective tissues, blood vessels, and nerve endings.
  • Hypodermis (subcutaneous layer): The innermost layer, composed mainly of fat that provides cushioning and insulation.

The stratum corneum, which is around 10–20 µm thick, is the main obstacle to drug permeation. It has a "brick-and-mortar" composition, consisting of dead keratinized cells set in a lipid matrix, making it highly resistant to foreign substances.

4.2 Drug Permeation Pathways

For a drug to enter the bloodstream via the skin, it must traverse one or more of the following routes:

  • Transcellular: Directly through the keratinocytes of the stratum corneum.
  • Intercellular: Between the cells, passing through lipid-rich regions.
  • Appendageal: Through structures like hair follicles and sweat glands.

The intercellular route is the most commonly utilized for drug delivery, although it presents a lengthy and complex path that limits drug diffusion.

4.3 Factors Affecting Skin Permeability

Several elements influence how well a drug can pass through the skin:

  • Drug-related factors:
    • Molecular weight: Ideal under 500 Daltons.
    • Lipophilicity: A balance between water and fat solubility is key.
    • Ionization: Non-ionized drugs are more easily absorbed.
  • Formulation factors:
    • Use of chemical agents (e.g., ethanol, oleic acid) to enhance penetration.
    • Incorporation of techniques like microneedles to aid delivery.
  • Biological factors:
    • Skin hydration level.
    • Thickness of the skin at the application site.
    • Age and overall condition of the patient’s skin.

4.4 Overcoming the Skin Barrier

To enhance transdermal drug absorption, various techniques are employed:

  • Chemical enhancers: These alter the lipid structure of the stratum corneum to improve permeability.
  • Physical methods:
    • Microneedles
    • Iontophoresis (uses electric current)
    • Sonophoresis (uses ultrasound)
    • Electroporation (uses electrical pulses)

These methods are particularly helpful for delivering drugs that are large in size or water-soluble.

???? Table 1: Key Factors Influencing Transdermal Drug Delivery

Factor

Description

Impact on TDDS

Stratum Corneum Thickness

Outer layer made of dead, keratinized cells

Thicker layers reduce drug penetration

Drug Molecular Weight

Optimal below 500 Daltons

Larger molecules struggle to cross the skin

Lipophilicity (Log P)

Ideal Log P between 1–3

Improves absorption into lipid layers of the skin

Ionization State

Non-ionized forms are preferred

Weak acids/bases are better absorbed than salts

Formulation Enhancers

Compounds like ethanol, oleic acid, menthol

Disrupt skin lipids to boost absorption

Skin Hydration

Moisture content of the stratum corneum

More hydrated skin increases permeability

Age and Skin Condition

Older skin is thicker and less elastic

Can reduce absorption efficiency

Application Site

Varies in skin thickness across body regions

Affects patch placement strategy

Permeation Pathway

Mainly intercellular and appendageal in TDDS

Determines delivery system design and need for enhancers

5. Types of Transdermal Patches

Transdermal patches are engineered in different configurations to optimize drug release, enhance formulation stability, and improve user comfort. The selection of a specific patch design depends on several factors, including the drug’s chemical characteristics, the desired release profile, and the therapeutic goal.

Most commercially available transdermal systems can be categorized into the following types:

5.1 Drug-in-Adhesive System

In this commonly used design, the active drug is embedded directly within the adhesive layer that both secures the patch to the skin and facilitates drug delivery. Its straightforward construction and ease of manufacturing make it widely popular.

Advantages:

  • Thin, pliable, and user-friendly
  • Simplified production process
  • Lower risk of sudden drug release ("dose dumping")

Example: Nicotine patches

5.2 Reservoir System

This patch consists of a liquid or gel drug reservoir sandwiched between an impermeable backing layer and a rate-controlling membrane. The drug is released through this membrane at a consistent rate over time.

Advantages:

  • Precise and controlled drug delivery
  • Ideal for potent drugs requiring prolonged administration

Disadvantages:

  • If the membrane is compromised, there's a risk of uncontrolled drug release
  • More complex and expensive to manufacture

Example: Catapres-TTS (Clonidine transdermal patch)

5.3 Matrix System

Here, the drug is evenly dispersed within a polymer matrix, and release occurs as the drug diffuses from the matrix into the skin. This design eliminates the need for a separate membrane to regulate release.

Advantages:

  • Simplified formulation
  • Flexible dosage customization
  • Can provide a steady or zero-order release pattern

Disadvantages:

  • Release rate may vary based on polymer composition

Example: Fentanyl matrix patches

5.4 Micro-Reservoir System

This system combines the characteristics of both reservoir and matrix types. It features microscopic drug reservoirs distributed within a polymer matrix, ensuring consistent and controlled drug diffusion.

Advantages:

  • Offers the benefits of matrix and reservoir designs
  • Enhanced control over drug delivery and improved stability

Disadvantages:

  • More complicated to formulate and produce

Example: Some cosmetic patches and experimental drug delivery systems

???? Summary Table: Comparison of Transdermal Patch Types

Patch Type

Drug Placement

Control Mechanism

Release Profile

Example

Drug-in-Adhesive

Within the adhesive layer

No separate control layer

Diffusion-based

Nicotine

Reservoir

Liquid/gel reservoir

Rate-controlling membrane

Steady and constant

Clonidine (Catapres-TTS)

Matrix

Uniformly in polymer matrix

Matrix itself

Controlled, possibly zero-order

Fentanyl

Micro-Reservoir

Micro-reservoirs in polymer

Dispersed reservoirs within matrix

Controlled and stable

Experimental systems

6. Antihypertensive Drugs for TDDS

The success of transdermal drug delivery is highly dependent on the physicochemical properties of the drug candidate. For an antihypertensive drug to be effectively delivered transdermally, it must exhibit:

  • Molecular weight < 500 Da
  • Moderate lipophilicity (Log P between 1 and 3)
  • High potency at low doses
  • Adequate skin permeability
  • Non-irritating and non-sensitizing properties

A variety of antihypertensive agents have been assessed for transdermal application. Some have received regulatory approval, while others are in different stages of experimental or clinical research.

6.1 Summary of Common Antihypertensive Drugs in TDDS

Drug

Class

TDDS Status

Key Highlights

Clonidine

Centrally acting α? agonist

Approved (Catapres-TTS®)

First antihypertensive drug marketed as a transdermal patch; 7-day release profile

Carvedilol

Non-selective β + α? blocker

Investigational

Matrix patches show zero-order kinetics; improves bioavailability significantly

Metoprolol Tartrate

β?-selective blocker

Investigational

Patches with PVP and Eudragit polymers enhance release; sustained effect observed

Atenolol

β?-selective blocker

Investigational

Enhanced skin permeability with oleic acid and polymer blends (CAP:PVP)

Timolol Maleate

β-blocker

Investigational

Matrix and reservoir designs explored; good skin compatibility and flux

Nicardipine HCl

Calcium channel blocker

Investigational

Combined with PG/oleic acid to improve skin flux; used for hypertension and angina

Propranolol

Non-selective β-blocker

Experimental

Various polymers used to improve permeability; under active study

Verapamil, Diltiazem

Calcium channel blockers

Investigational

Incorporated in multiple polymer systems; controlled release potential observed

6.2 Highlights from Selected Drug Studies

Clonidine (Catapres-TTS®)

  • First FDA-approved transdermal antihypertensive patch.
  • Delivers medication over a 7-day period.
  • Significantly enhances compliance, especially in elderly patients.

Carvedilol

  • Oral bioavailability is low (~30%) due to first-pass metabolism.
  • Transdermal matrix patches with Eudragit and PVP exhibit zero-order drug release and improved systemic availability (~71% in preclinical trials)

Metoprolol Tartrate

  • Characterized by a short half-life (2–3 hours) and significant hepatic metabolism.
  • Eudragit RL100 and PVA-based patches demonstrated sustained drug release (up to 95% over 48 hours) and minimal skin irritation.

Atenolol

  • Limited by poor skin permeability due to its hydrophilicity.
  • CAP: PVP patches combined with penetration enhancers (e.g., isopropyl myristate) showed improved permeation following Higuchi kinetics.

Nicardipine Hydrochloride

  • Rapidly cleared from systemic circulation after oral administration.
  • Transdermal formulations using propylene glycol and oleic acid exhibited enhanced skin permeation and prolonged pharmacologic effect.

6.3 Experimental and Future Prospects

  • Beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers remain the primary classes investigated for TDDS applications.
  • Microneedle-based systems are being explored for emergency antihypertensives like sodium nitroprusside (SNP), potentially enabling rapid blood pressure control in acute care.
  • New-generation antihypertensive agents such as valsartan, lisinopril, and amlodipine are under preclinical evaluation for transdermal delivery in the form of sustained-release patches or hybrid systems.

7. Formulation Techniques and Evaluation

The efficacy of a Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS) is determined not only by the drug’s physicochemical compatibility with transdermal administration but also by the choice of polymers, formulation techniques, and comprehensive evaluation. An optimized patch design ensures consistent drug release, mechanical integrity, and skin compatibility, thereby enhancing patient adherence and therapeutic outcomes.

7.1 Formulation Techniques

a) Solvent Casting Method

This widely used method involves dissolving or dispersing the drug in a polymeric solution containing plasticizers and permeation enhancers. The mixture is cast onto a flat surface and allowed to dry, forming a uniform film.

Example:

  • Carvedilol patches prepared using HPMC and Eudragit RL100 via solvent casting exhibited strong mechanical properties and sustained drug release.

b) Matrix-Type Formulation

Here, the drug is uniformly distributed within a polymer matrix, allowing controlled diffusion upon application to the skin.
Example:

  • Metoprolol tartrate patches formulated with Eudragit RL100:PVA matrices released 95% of the drug over 48 hours, following Higuchi kinetics.

c) Reservoir-Type Formulation

The drug is enclosed in a gel or liquid reservoir positioned between an impermeable backing layer and a rate-controlling membrane.

Example:

  • Nicardipine HCl patches formulated with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) membranes enhanced drug flux through the skin.

7.2 Polymers Used in TDDS

Polymer

Type

Function

HPMC

Hydrophilic

Film-forming, modulates drug release

Eudragit RL100/RS100

Hydrophobic

Sustained-release matrix for extended action

PVP

Hydrophilic

Enhances drug solubility and film flexibility

EC (Ethyl Cellulose)

Hydrophobic

Acts as a rate-controlling barrier

CAP (Cellulose Acetate Phthalate)

Enteric

Suitable for slow-release formulations

7.3 Plasticizers and Permeation Enhancers

  • Plasticizers improve patch flexibility and reduce brittleness:
    Common examples include propylene glycol, PEG-400, glycerin, and dibutyl phthalate.
  • Permeation Enhancers disrupt the stratum corneum’s lipid matrix to increase drug penetration:
    Common agents: oleic acid, isopropyl myristate, menthol, and limonene.

7.4 Evaluation Parameters

A. Physicochemical Characterization

  • Thickness: Measured using a micrometer screw gauge.
  • Weight uniformity: Ensures batch-to-batch consistency.
  • Folding endurance: Reflects mechanical strength and flexibility.
  • Tensile strength: Evaluates patch durability under stress.
  • Surface pH: Ensures skin compatibility (ideally close to skin pH).
  • Moisture content & Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR): Indicate stability and breathability.

B. Drug Content Uniformity

Determines even distribution of drug across the patch. Typically analyzed using UV-Visible spectrophotometry or High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

C. In Vitro Drug Release Studies

  • Conducted using Franz diffusion cells with artificial membranes or animal skin.
  • Data analyzed using kinetic models:
    • Zero-order kinetics: Constant drug release (ideal).
    • First-order kinetics: Rate depends on drug concentration.
    • Higuchi model: Describes diffusion-controlled release.

Example:

  • Carvedilol patches demonstrated zero-order release kinetics, suitable for maintaining stable plasma drug concentrations.

D. Skin Irritation Studies

  • Performed on animal models (e.g., rat abdominal skin) to assess dermal safety.
  • Ensures the patch is non-irritating, non-sensitizing, and safe for prolonged use.

8. Recent Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

Although traditional transdermal patches have demonstrated success with drugs such as clonidine and fentanyl, challenges like limited drug candidates, dose constraints, and variable skin permeability have prompted significant innovation in the field. Recent technological advances aim to improve delivery efficiency, targeted release, and patient-centric design, thus broadening the therapeutic scope of TDDS.

8.1 Smart Patches

Smart patches integrate biosensors with drug delivery platforms to monitor physiological markers (e.g., glucose, pH, temperature) and regulate drug release dynamically. These systems often incorporate microneedles and stimuli-responsive polymers for precision delivery.

Example:

  • A smart insulin patch equipped with 121 microneedles loaded with insulin and glucose-sensing enzymes. Upon detecting hyperglycemia, insulin is automatically released via a hypoxia-sensitive polymer, mimicking natural insulin response.

Benefits:

  • Painless and minimally invasive
  • Responsive to real-time physiological changes
  • Reduces risk of overdose or underdose
  • Enhances patient compliance

8.2 Microneedle-Based Patches

Microneedles bypass the stratum corneum, enabling enhanced transdermal penetration without pain. These systems are categorized by structure and function:

Type

Key Feature

Solid

Create microchannels for later drug application

Hollow

Deliver liquid drugs through bore channels

Coated

Drug coated onto needle surface dissolves on insertion

Dissolving

Biodegradable needles dissolve after drug delivery

Example:

  • Sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a potent antihypertensive agent, was effectively delivered using dissolving microneedles, achieving rapid blood pressure reduction in preclinical models.

8.3 Dissolving/Biodegradable Patches

These patches dissolve upon contact with skin, releasing the drug without leaving residues. Ideal for single-use therapies such as vaccines, antibiotics, or pediatric medications.

Example:

  • Gentamicin-loaded dissolving microneedle patches showed efficacy against Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in mice.

Advantages:

  • No removal required
  • Reduced biohazardous waste
  • Enhanced biocompatibility and safety

8.4 3D-Printed and High-Loading Patches

3D printing technology enables the fabrication of customized patch geometries, allowing precise drug loading and tailored release profiles. These patches can be designed for complex conditions requiring high-dose or multi-drug regimens.

Example:

  • Curcumin-loaded 3D-printed patches embedded with phase-change materials (PCMs) release the drug upon heat stimulation, offering thermally-triggered delivery.

8.5 Dual-Function Smart Patches

These patches offer simultaneous monitoring and therapy, especially beneficial for chronic wound care and diabetic ulcers.

Examples:

  • pH-sensitive patches for monitoring wound infection status.
  • Hydrogel-based patches that both promote healing and deliver antibiotics or analgesics.

Applications:

  • Diabetic foot ulcers
  • Bedsores in immobile patients
  • Post-surgical wound management

Summary of Recent Innovations

Technology

Purpose

Key Advantage

Smart Patches

On-demand drug release via biosensing

Responsive therapy, patient-specific adjustments

Microneedle Systems

Bypass skin barrier painlessly

High permeability with minimal discomfort

Dissolving Patches

Biodegradable, single-use delivery

Safe, eco-friendly, no removal required

3D-Printed Patches

Customized design, complex delivery

Precision dosing, adaptable drug profiles

Dual-Function Patches

Drug delivery + physiological monitoring

Ideal for wounds, ulcers, and skin disorders

9. Clinical and Economic Considerations

While transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) demonstrate significant promise in antihypertensive therapy from a pharmacokinetic and technological standpoint, their clinical relevance and economic viability are equally important to assess for real-world applicability.

9.1 Clinical Benefits and Patient Acceptance

A major challenge in hypertension management is poor medication adherence, often due to frequent dosing schedules, side effects, or forgetfulness. TDDS offers a patient-friendly alternative with several clinical advantages:

  • Sustained and controlled drug release over extended periods (hours to days)
  • Improved compliance, particularly in geriatric patients or those with dysphagia
  • Ease of discontinuation by simply removing the patch
  • Minimized side effects due to steady-state plasma drug levels

Clinical studies—such as those evaluating clonidine transdermal patches—demonstrate effective blood pressure control with reduced fluctuations and high patient tolerance. The non-invasive and painless nature of TDDS also contributes to better patient satisfaction and treatment adherence.

9.2 Health Economic Impact

Although TDDS typically involves higher upfront costs than conventional oral therapies, long-term economic evaluations suggest potential cost savings across the healthcare system. A Medicaid-based study from Florida and South Carolina compared oral antihypertensive users to those on clonidine patches and reported:

  • Reduced hospitalization rates
  • Lower emergency room visits
  • Fewer diagnostic procedures

These indirect cost savings, attributed to improved disease control and reduced acute care needs, suggest that TDDS could be cost-effective in the long term by decreasing healthcare resource utilization.

9.3 Limitations in Widespread Adoption

Despite their promise, several challenges hinder the broad clinical adoption of TDDS for antihypertensive therapy:

  • Limited drug availability in transdermal form
  • Higher manufacturing costs and complex regulatory approval processes
  • Patient skepticism regarding patch effectiveness versus oral tablets
  • Potential for skin irritation with long-term or repeated use

These factors necessitate further product innovation, educational efforts, and cost-optimization strategies to support broader adoption.

9.4 Market Outlook and Future Integration

With the emergence of smart patches, microneedle platforms, and wearable health technologies, the market outlook for TDDS in hypertension management is increasingly optimistic. Integration with remote monitoring systems and patient-specific delivery algorithms could significantly enhance the role of TDDS in personalized medicine. As healthcare shifts toward home-based and technology-assisted models, TDDS is poised to become a central tool in chronic disease management, including hypertension. Future developments focusing on drug compatibility, patient usability, and economic scalability will be key to unlocking their full potential.

10. Future Perspectives

The future of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) in antihypertensive therapy is promising, aligning with the ongoing shift in healthcare toward personalized, patient-centric, and technology-integrated models. While certain limitations persist, advancements in materials science, drug formulation, and digital health technologies continue to redefine the capabilities of transdermal systems in cardiovascular management.

10.1 Expanding the Antihypertensive Drug Portfolio

Currently, clonidine remains the only commercially available antihypertensive drug in transdermal form. However, preclinical and investigational studies are paving the way for the transdermal delivery of additional agents, including:

  • Carvedilol
  • Metoprolol tartrate
  • Atenolol
  • Nicardipine
  • Verapamil and diltiazem

Through optimized formulation strategies and the use of permeation enhancers, these drugs hold potential for future commercialization. Expanding the transdermal drug portfolio would allow for greater therapeutic flexibility, improving outcomes for patients with variable clinical profiles.

10.2 Integration with Smart Healthcare Technologies

TDDS is no longer limited to passive drug release. Next-generation systems are incorporating biosensing and digital connectivity, leading to the development of smart patches capable of:

  • Monitoring vital signs (e.g., blood pressure, glucose levels, pH)
  • Responsive drug release based on real-time physiological feedback
  • Wireless data transmission to healthcare providers for remote monitoring

Such advancements align TDDS with telemedicine and remote care, enhancing its utility in home-bound, geriatric, and chronic disease populations.

10.3 Microneedle and Biodegradable Delivery Platforms

Microneedle-based TDDS are gaining momentum due to their ability to:

  • Deliver drugs quickly and painlessly
  • Penetrate the stratum corneum without causing discomfort
  • Facilitate administration of large molecules or poorly permeable drugs

Dissolving microneedles and biodegradable patch systems also eliminate the need for removal, reduce skin irritation, and minimize environmental impact, making them ideal for single-use applications, particularly in emergency settings and for paediatric or elderly care.

10.4 Personalized Drug Dosing and AI-Driven Delivery

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into TDDS design opens the door for individualized therapy. AI algorithms could analyze a patient’s physiological data—such as circadian blood pressure fluctuations—and dynamically modulate drug release to maintain optimal therapeutic levels. This would significantly:

  • Reduce variability in response
  • Improve dosing accuracy
  • Minimize adverse effects

Such precision medicine approaches could revolutionize hypertension management, moving beyond one-size-fits-all regimens.

10.5 Challenges and Considerations

To fully realize these innovations, several key barriers must be addressed:

  • Development of universal and safe permeation enhancers
  • Execution of large-scale, multi-centric clinical trials
  • Establishment of clear regulatory pathways for novel TDDS (e.g., smart patches, 3D-printed devices)
  • Implementation of cost-effective manufacturing techniques to improve affordability and access

Addressing these challenges will be crucial to translating laboratory success into real-world clinical impact.

11. CONCLUSION

Hypertension remains a globally prevalent and persistent health challenge, often complicated by the limitations of conventional oral drug therapy—such as poor bioavailability, dosing frequency, and patient non-compliance. In this context, Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) offer a compelling alternative by enabling non-invasive, sustained, and controlled drug release. TDDS have demonstrated significant promise in enhancing the pharmacokinetic profiles and therapeutic outcomes of antihypertensive agents, including clonidine, metoprolol, carvedilol, and atenolol. These systems not only improve adherence—particularly in elderly or chronically ill populations—but also minimize systemic side effects by maintaining steady plasma drug levels. The landscape of TDDS is being further revolutionized by technological innovations, such as microneedles, smart patches, biodegradable systems, and 3D-printed formulations. These advancements overcome earlier limitations like low skin permeability and fixed dosing, while paving the way for personalized, responsive, and digitally integrated hypertension management. Despite ongoing challenges—such as higher manufacturing costs, limited transdermal formulations, and regulatory complexities—the growing body of clinical and economic evidence supports the broader adoption of TDDS. With continued research, supportive policy frameworks, and integration into smart healthcare ecosystems, transdermal systems are well-positioned to become a cornerstone modality in the future of antihypertensive therapy.

REFERENCES

  1. Selvam RP, Singh AK, Sivakumar T. Transdermal drug delivery systems for antihypertensive drugs - A review. Int J Pharm Biomed Res. 2010;1(1):1–8.
  2. Rastogi V, Yadav P, Bhargava S, et al. Transdermal drug delivery system: An overview. Int J Pharm Res Health Sci. 2012;1(1):76–83.
  3. Wong WF, Ang KP, Sethi G, Looi CY. Recent Advancement of Medical Patch for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Medicina. 2023;59(4):778.
  4. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  5. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–14.
  6. Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: Current and future prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006;13(3):175–87.
  7. Aqil M, Ali A, Sultana Y, et al. Transdermal drug delivery of labetalol hydrochloride: Feasibility and effect of permeation enhancers. Drug Deliv. 2005;12(5):293–9.
  8. Jain AK, Thomas NS, Panchagnula R. Transdermal drug delivery of imipramine hydrochloride. II. Effect of terpenes. J Control Release. 2002;79(1–3):93–101.
  9. Chien YW. Transdermal therapeutic systems. In: Robinson JR, Lee VHL, editors. Controlled Drug Delivery. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1987. p. 524–52.
  10. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib, Chandira RM, Jayakar B. Recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system. Int J PharmTech Res. 2010;2(1):68–77.
  11. Raza K, Singh B, Lohan S, et al. Nano-carrier based transdermal drug delivery: Current status and future prospects. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(12):4071–410.
  12. Rhee Y-S, Park C-W, Nam T-Y, Chi S-C. Formulation of a transdermal delivery system for verapamil and its in vitro permeation study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2001;27(10):1007–12.
  13. Benson HAE. Transdermal drug delivery: Penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005;2(1):23–33.
  14. Jain R, Ancheria RK, Jain SK. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system for atenolol. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2006;40(4):365–8.
  15. Eswaramma M, Sravani B, Dutt KR. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of atenolol. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;3(1):142–6.
  16. Krishnaiah YSR, Satyanarayana V, Karthikeyan RS. Development of transdermal drug delivery system of nicardipine hydrochloride using membrane moderated approach. J Control Release. 2004;95(3):367–78.
  17. Swarnlata S, Neetu R, Sanjay J. Timolol maleate matrix transdermal patches: Design and in vitro characterization. J Pharm Res. 2008;7(2):101–5.
  18. Ubaidulla U, Reddy MV, Ruckmani K, et al. Transdermal therapeutic system of carvedilol: Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix on in vitro and in vivo characteristics. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2007;8(1):E1–6.
  19. Bharkatiya M, Nema RK, Bhatnagar M. Development and characterization of transdermal drug delivery system of lisinopril. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2010;1(1):8–14.
  20. Shivakumar HN, Rajashekhar V, Desai BG, et al. Design and evaluation of matrix transdermal patches of a model antihypertensive drug. Asian J Pharm. 2009;3(1):59–65.
  21. Akiladevi D, Basak S. Formulation and evaluation of bilayered patches of metoprolol tartrate. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;3(2):130–4.
  22. Dhanaraju MD, Senthil V, Hariharan M, et al. Design and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery of ketorolac tromethamine. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2004;66(2):238–40.
  23. Mukherjee B, Mahapatra S, Gupta R, et al. A comparison between povidone-ethyl cellulose and povidone-eudragit transdermal dexamethasone matrix patches based on in vitro skin permeation. Eur J Pharm BioPharma. 2005;59(3):475–83.
  24. Kang L, Ho PC, Chan SY. Interactions between skin and surfactants used in topical and transdermal delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007;4(6):659–72.
  25. Shinde AJ, Maru AD, More HN, Luniya KP. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of a selected antihypertensive drug. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2010;3(3):46–50.
  26. Prajapati ST, Patel CN, Patel GN. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of ondansetron hydrochloride. Int J Pharm Investig. 2011;1(2):112–8.
  27. Jain S, Tiwary AK, Sapra B, Jain NK. Formulation and evaluation of ethosomes for transdermal delivery of lamivudine. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8(4):E111.
  28. Jain NK. Advances in Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 2001.
  29. Chaturvedi M, Kumar M, Pathak K. A review on mucoadhesive polymer used in nasal drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2(4):215–22.
  30. Naik A, Kalia YN, Guy RH. Transdermal drug delivery: Overcoming the skin’s barrier function. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2000;3(9):318–26.
  31. Park JH, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR. Biodegradable polymer microneedles: Fabrication, mechanics and transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104(1):51–66.
  32. Ita K. Transdermal drug delivery: Progress and challenges. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2014;24(3):245–50.
  33. Prajapati ST, Patel CN, Patel GN. Formulation, development and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of atenolol. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2009;1(2):156–63.
  34. Kalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(5):619–58.

Reference

  1. Selvam RP, Singh AK, Sivakumar T. Transdermal drug delivery systems for antihypertensive drugs - A review. Int J Pharm Biomed Res. 2010;1(1):1–8.
  2. Rastogi V, Yadav P, Bhargava S, et al. Transdermal drug delivery system: An overview. Int J Pharm Res Health Sci. 2012;1(1):76–83.
  3. Wong WF, Ang KP, Sethi G, Looi CY. Recent Advancement of Medical Patch for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Medicina. 2023;59(4):778.
  4. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.
  5. Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–14.
  6. Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: Current and future prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006;13(3):175–87.
  7. Aqil M, Ali A, Sultana Y, et al. Transdermal drug delivery of labetalol hydrochloride: Feasibility and effect of permeation enhancers. Drug Deliv. 2005;12(5):293–9.
  8. Jain AK, Thomas NS, Panchagnula R. Transdermal drug delivery of imipramine hydrochloride. II. Effect of terpenes. J Control Release. 2002;79(1–3):93–101.
  9. Chien YW. Transdermal therapeutic systems. In: Robinson JR, Lee VHL, editors. Controlled Drug Delivery. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1987. p. 524–52.
  10. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib, Chandira RM, Jayakar B. Recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system. Int J PharmTech Res. 2010;2(1):68–77.
  11. Raza K, Singh B, Lohan S, et al. Nano-carrier based transdermal drug delivery: Current status and future prospects. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(12):4071–410.
  12. Rhee Y-S, Park C-W, Nam T-Y, Chi S-C. Formulation of a transdermal delivery system for verapamil and its in vitro permeation study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2001;27(10):1007–12.
  13. Benson HAE. Transdermal drug delivery: Penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005;2(1):23–33.
  14. Jain R, Ancheria RK, Jain SK. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system for atenolol. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2006;40(4):365–8.
  15. Eswaramma M, Sravani B, Dutt KR. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of atenolol. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;3(1):142–6.
  16. Krishnaiah YSR, Satyanarayana V, Karthikeyan RS. Development of transdermal drug delivery system of nicardipine hydrochloride using membrane moderated approach. J Control Release. 2004;95(3):367–78.
  17. Swarnlata S, Neetu R, Sanjay J. Timolol maleate matrix transdermal patches: Design and in vitro characterization. J Pharm Res. 2008;7(2):101–5.
  18. Ubaidulla U, Reddy MV, Ruckmani K, et al. Transdermal therapeutic system of carvedilol: Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix on in vitro and in vivo characteristics. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2007;8(1):E1–6.
  19. Bharkatiya M, Nema RK, Bhatnagar M. Development and characterization of transdermal drug delivery system of lisinopril. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2010;1(1):8–14.
  20. Shivakumar HN, Rajashekhar V, Desai BG, et al. Design and evaluation of matrix transdermal patches of a model antihypertensive drug. Asian J Pharm. 2009;3(1):59–65.
  21. Akiladevi D, Basak S. Formulation and evaluation of bilayered patches of metoprolol tartrate. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;3(2):130–4.
  22. Dhanaraju MD, Senthil V, Hariharan M, et al. Design and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery of ketorolac tromethamine. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2004;66(2):238–40.
  23. Mukherjee B, Mahapatra S, Gupta R, et al. A comparison between povidone-ethyl cellulose and povidone-eudragit transdermal dexamethasone matrix patches based on in vitro skin permeation. Eur J Pharm BioPharma. 2005;59(3):475–83.
  24. Kang L, Ho PC, Chan SY. Interactions between skin and surfactants used in topical and transdermal delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007;4(6):659–72.
  25. Shinde AJ, Maru AD, More HN, Luniya KP. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of a selected antihypertensive drug. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2010;3(3):46–50.
  26. Prajapati ST, Patel CN, Patel GN. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of ondansetron hydrochloride. Int J Pharm Investig. 2011;1(2):112–8.
  27. Jain S, Tiwary AK, Sapra B, Jain NK. Formulation and evaluation of ethosomes for transdermal delivery of lamivudine. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8(4):E111.
  28. Jain NK. Advances in Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 2001.
  29. Chaturvedi M, Kumar M, Pathak K. A review on mucoadhesive polymer used in nasal drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2(4):215–22.
  30. Naik A, Kalia YN, Guy RH. Transdermal drug delivery: Overcoming the skin’s barrier function. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2000;3(9):318–26.
  31. Park JH, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR. Biodegradable polymer microneedles: Fabrication, mechanics and transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104(1):51–66.
  32. Ita K. Transdermal drug delivery: Progress and challenges. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2014;24(3):245–50.
  33. Prajapati ST, Patel CN, Patel GN. Formulation, development and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of atenolol. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2009;1(2):156–63.
  34. Kalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(5):619–58.

Photo
Gaurav Pandole
Corresponding author

SAGE University Bhopal.

Photo
Vikas Kumar
Co-author

SAGE University Bhopal.

Photo
Dr. Jitendra Banweer
Co-author

SAGE University Bhopal.

Gaurav Pandole*, Vikas Kumar, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, Role of Transdermal drug delivery System in the Treatment of Hypertension, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 5, 1844-1858 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15386527

More related articles
Nanoparticles for Crossing the Blood–Brain Barri...
Shivendra Ughade, Dr. Rakhee Kapadia , Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Cold Cream ...
Shivam Kumar, Arun Kumar, Lav Kumar, Abhinit Kumar, Kaushal Kumar...
Curative Therapy: Impact on Family Care and Societ...
Himanshi Shrivastava , Priyal Jain, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Herbal Ointment Containing Neem and Turmeric ...
Kaushal Kumar, Arun Kumar, Shivam Kumar, Lav Kumar, Vikas Kumar, Abhinit Kumar, ...
The Impact of Pharmaceuticals on the Environment ...
Ajay Kumar Shah, Dr. Megha Parashar, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Antimicrobial Resistance: Impacts, Challenges, and Future Prospects...
Akshat Markam, Swati Khare, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Related Articles
Method Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Assay for The ...
Shivam Kumar, Anirudha Malik, Arun Kumar, Kaushal Kumar, Vikas Kumar, Lav Kumar, ...
HPLC New Changes ...
Nandini choudhary , Dr. Sarika Shrivastava , Dr. Jitendra Banweer , ...
The Role of AI in Pharmaceutical Industry...
Anurag Mahoriya, Dr. Megha Parashar, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Impact of Telemedicine on patient Compliance and Drug Adherence ...
Deepak Sahu , Dr. Praveen Tahilani , Dr. Jitendra Banweer, Dr. Sarika Shrivastava , ...
Nanoparticles for Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier in Alzheimer’s Disease Tr...
Shivendra Ughade, Dr. Rakhee Kapadia , Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
More related articles
Nanoparticles for Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier in Alzheimer’s Disease Tr...
Shivendra Ughade, Dr. Rakhee Kapadia , Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Cold Cream ...
Shivam Kumar, Arun Kumar, Lav Kumar, Abhinit Kumar, Kaushal Kumar, Vikas Kumar, ...
Curative Therapy: Impact on Family Care and Society...
Himanshi Shrivastava , Priyal Jain, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Nanoparticles for Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier in Alzheimer’s Disease Tr...
Shivendra Ughade, Dr. Rakhee Kapadia , Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Herbal Cold Cream ...
Shivam Kumar, Arun Kumar, Lav Kumar, Abhinit Kumar, Kaushal Kumar, Vikas Kumar, ...
Curative Therapy: Impact on Family Care and Society...
Himanshi Shrivastava , Priyal Jain, Dr. Jitendra Banweer, ...