View Article

  • Oral Gels in Drug Delivery: A Patient-Friendly Approach to Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy

  • Department of pharmacy, M.J.P. Rohilkand University, Bareilly

Abstract

The aim of this review is to explore and evaluate oral gel formulations, utilizing both natural and synthetic polymers. Oral gels serve as effective drug delivery systems due to their ability to provide precise drug release, enhanced stability, and local therapeutic effects. Various physicochemical parameters of oral gels that influence their properties are discussed. Oral gels are evaluated for their gelling capacity, mechanical strength, bio-adhesion, spread-ability, microbiological safety, and in vitro drug release profiles. The analysis suggests that oral gel formulations offer a promising approach for local treatment in the oral cavity, improving drug bioavailability and enabling rapid action at the target site. They also reduce systemic side effects and avoid challenges related to gastrointestinal degradation or first-pass metabolism. Oral gels thus represent a safe, effective, and patient-friendly dosage form for managing oral conditions and delivering therapeutic agents efficiently. Further research is needed to optimize formulation strategies and fully understand the mechanisms of drug release and action in the oral cavity.

Keywords

Oral gel, Drug delivery, Bio-adhesion, Controlled release, Gelling agents, Oral mucosa, Polymer-based formulation, Bioavailability

Introduction

Oral gels are semi-solid dosage forms specifically designed to improve drug delivery within the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract. They are characterized as semi-rigid systems in which the mobility of a liquid medium is restricted by a three-dimensional network of polymers or colloidal particles, resulting in desirable properties such as muco-adhesion, spread-ability, and localized or systemic drug delivery potential. The term gel, derived from “gelatin” and rooted in the Latin gelu (frost) and gelare (to freeze), reflects their transformation from a liquid to an elastic, solid-like matrix capable of entrapping fluids. Historically, gels were recognized as a distinct pharmaceutical system in the late 19th century, when formulations were classified based on their physical and phenomenological characteristics.[1]

According to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), gels are defined as semisolid systems containing either suspensions of small inorganic particles or dispersions of large organic macromolecules in a liquid medium. They may exist as two-phase systems, where discrete particles form a colloidal network or as single-phase systems, in which polymers are uniformly distributed without visible boundaries. For oral gels, water and hydroalcoholic solutions are the most widely used dispersion media.[2]

From a pharmaceutical standpoint, oral gels offer distinct advantages over conventional dosage forms. Their viscosity and mucoadhesive properties prolong residence time in the oral cavity, improve drug absorption, sustain therapeutic action, and enhance patient compliance. Many formulations exhibit reversible sol–gel transitions, allowing a switch between liquid and semisolid states under specific physiological conditions, while others form irreversible networks that improve stability. The physical appearance of oral gels may vary from transparent to turbid depending on the drug and excipients, with gelling agents typically employed in concentrations of 0.5–2.0%. Despite such small quantities, these agents impart a broad range of rheological and mechanical properties, making gels highly versatile carriers for drugs including antifungal, antimicrobial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and more recently, antidiabetic agents.[3]

Evolution of Oral Gels in Drug Delivery

The development of oral gels as pharmaceutical systems has undergone significant transformation over the last century. Originally, gels were limited to topical, dental, and cosmetic applications, where their semi-solid consistency, spreadability, and ease of local application were valued. With advances in polymer science and colloidal chemistry, their potential as carriers for oral and systemic drug delivery gradually emerged. [4,5]

  1. Early Stage (Topical & Dental Applications): Oral gels were initially used for local treatment of infections, inflammation, and pain within the oral cavity, such as antifungal (clotrimazole gels) or analgesic gels. [6,7]
  2. Expansion to Systemic Delivery: The introduction of biocompatible polymers (e.g., carbopol, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose) allowed gels to be adapted for oral administration of drugs intended for systemic absorption. [8,9]
  3. Mucoadhesive Gels: By the late 20th century, research shifted toward mucoadhesive formulations that adhered to oral or gastrointestinal mucosa, improving residence time and bioavailability. This was especially valuable for drugs with poor solubility or rapid degradation.[10]
  4. In-situ Gelling Systems: The next step was in-situ gels, which are administered as liquids but transform into gels under physiological triggers such as pH, ionic strength, or temperature. These systems offered better patient compliance and controlled release.[11]
  5. Smart/Stimuli-Responsive Gels: Recent innovations focus on responsive gels that can react to external or internal stimuli (e.g., pH-sensitive, temperature-sensitive, enzyme-sensitive, or glucose-sensitive). These systems have opened opportunities for precision medicine, particularly in chronic conditions such as diabetes. [12,13]

Table 1 : Routes of Administration and Delivery Pathways for Oral Gels [14,15,16]

Route of Administration

Description

Advantages

Buccal Route

(Via Oral Mucosa)

Oral gels are applied to the buccal cavity where drugs penetrate the mucosal lining.

Bypasses gastrointestinal degradation and hepatic first-pass metabolism, improves systemic bioavailability.

Sublingual Route

Gel placed beneath the tongue, enabling rapid diffusion through sublingual mucosa.

Provides rapid onset of action due to high vascularization.

Gastrointestinal Route (Swallowed Gels)

Oral gels are swallowed and act in the GI tract, releasing drug locally or systemically.

Useful for gastric/intestinal disorders, systemic absorption; mucoadhesive polymers prolong GI residence.

Mucoadhesive/ Periodontal Route

Applied to gingival or periodontal pockets for sustained local release.

Effective for dental/periodontal infections and inflammation.

Targeted/Modified Release (In-situ & Stimuli-Responsive Gels)

Gels undergo sol-to-gel transition under triggers like pH, ionic strength, or temperature.

Improves patient compliance, provides controlled or site-specific drug release.

Gel structure and Network Formation:

The rigidity and stability of oral gels are primarily derived from the three-dimensional network formed by gelling agents. This network results from the interconnection of particles, and its structural characteristics depend on both the nature of the gelling agent and the type of intermolecular forces involved.[17]

In oral gels, hydrophilic colloids can exist either as spherical units, aggregates of smaller molecules, or as long polymeric chains. These components interconnect to create a gel matrix through different arrangements, such as entangled polymer chains or ordered crystalline alignments. The degree of cross-linking and organization directly influences the viscosity, spreadability, and drug release properties of the formulation.[18]

The interactions that stabilize the gel framework vary in strength, ranging from strong covalent linkages (as in certain inorganic gels like silica-based systems) to weaker forces such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, or van der Waals attractions. In gels dominated by weaker interactions, a minor increase in temperature can disrupt the structure and lead to liquefaction. This property is particularly important in designing oral gels, as it determines their thermal stability, shelf-life, and patient acceptability.[19]

Figure 1: shows different types of gel network structures, including spherical particle aggregates, rod-like frameworks, crystalline junctions, and covalent junctions.

Advantages of Gels: [20,21,22]

  1. Improved Patient Compliance easy to administer, especially for pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic patients.
  2. Controlled Drug Release can sustain or localize drug release depending on the gel matrix (physical or chemical network).
  3. High Stability of API protects sensitive drugs (e.g., peptides, proteins) from degradation in liquid solutions.
  4. Better Bioavailability enhances solubility and absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs.
  5. Ease of Formulation simple preparation with biopolymers (e.g., polysaccharides, cellulose derivatives).
  6. Non-greasy & Pleasant Texture preferred over ointments and creams in topical use.
  7. Targeted Delivery can adhere to mucosal surfaces (buccal, oral, vaginal) and provide site-specific action.
  8. Reduced Side Effects lower systemic absorption in topical/oral gels compared to oral solid dosage forms.

Disadvantages of Gels: [23,24,25]

  1. Limited drug loading not suitable for drugs requiring high doses due to solubility and viscosity constraints.
  2. Physical instability prone to dehydration, shrinkage (syneresis), or microbial contamination during storage.
  3. Chemical instability some gels are sensitive to pH, temperature, or ionic strength, altering drug release.
  4. Short residence time in oral gels, rapid dilution or swallowing may reduce contact time with mucosa.
  5. Irritation potential certain gelling agents or preservatives may cause irritation/allergic reactions.
  6. Sterility issues aqueous gels can support microbial growth, requiring preservatives or sterile handling.
  7. Viscosity variation environmental conditions (temperature, ionic content) can alter gel consistency.
  8. Not suitable for all drugs poor choice for lipophilic drugs unless modified with surfactants or cosolvents.

Key Properties of Gels: [26,27,28]

  1. Network Structure

The firmness and rigidity of gels arise from the three-dimensional network formed by interconnected particles of the gelling agent. The type of particles and the forces linking them whether physical (hydrogen bonding, van der Waals) or chemical (covalent cross-links) determine the mechanical strength, elasticity, and overall properties of the gel.

  1. Swelling Behavior

Gels can absorb liquids and expand in volume, which represents the initial stage of gel-solvent interaction. When a solvent penetrates the gel matrix, the original gel-gel interactions are replaced by gel-solvent interactions. The extent of swelling is often restricted by cross-linking within the gel network, which prevents complete dissolution. Swelling is maximized when the solvent's properties closely match the gelling agent’s solubility characteristics.

  1. Syneresis (Contraction of Gel)

Over time, gels may undergo shrinkage, releasing interstitial fluid to the surface a phenomenon known as syneresis. This occurs in hydrogels, organogels, and inorganic gels. The process is influenced by polymer concentration, pH, electrolyte levels, and relaxation of elastic stresses formed during gel setting, which reduces the available space for solvent, forcing its expulsion.

  1. Ageing

Gels are dynamic systems and may continue to change after initial formation. Ageing refers to slow, spontaneous structural rearrangements in the gel, resulting in a denser network of gelling agent over time. This process resembles the initial gelation and can lead to gradual loss of free fluid from the gel matrix.

  1. Rheological Properties

Gels typically show non-Newtonian, pseudoplastic flow behavior, where viscosity decreases under increasing shear stress. In particulate gels, applied stress disrupts interparticle associations, while in polymer-based gels, macromolecules align along the direction of flow, reducing internal resistance. This property is crucial for processing, application, and ease of administration.

  1. Transparency

Many gels exhibit optical clarity due to uniform dispersion of gelling agents and solvents, which can enhance patient acceptability and allow visual assessment of homogeneity or phase separation.

  1. Adhesiveness

Gels often possess mucoadhesive or surface-adhesive properties, allowing them to adhere to mucosal membranes (oral, buccal, vaginal) or skin, which facilitates localized drug delivery and prolongs residence time.

Classification of Gel:[29,30]

Table 2: Classification of Gels Based on Composition, Cross-linking, and Application.

Classification Basis

Type of Gel

Description

Nature of Solvent

Hydrogel

Water is the dispersion medium; e.g., gelatin, alginate gels

 

Organo-gel

Organic solvent as medium; e.g., sorbitol organo-gel

Type of Cross-linking

Physical Gel

Non-covalent interactions like hydrogen bonds, ionic interactions; reversible

 

Chemical Gel

Covalent cross-linking; permanent network; e.g., polyacrylamide gel

Nature of Particles

Inorganic Gel

Formed by inorganic particles; e.g., silica gel, aluminum hydroxide

 

Organic Gel

Formed by organic macromolecules; e.g., polysaccharides, proteins, synthetic polymers

Swelling Behavior

Superabsorbent Gel

High liquid uptake capacity; used for wound dressings, diapers

 

Non-absorbent Gel

Limited swelling; maintains structure without much liquid uptake

Application / Route

Topical Gel

Applied to skin; e.g., antiseptic gels, anti-inflammatory gels

 

Oral / Buccal Gel

For drug delivery in the oral cavity; e.g., mucoadhesive gels

 

Vaginal / Rectal Gel

Localized drug delivery to mucosal surfaces; e.g., antifungal gels

Gel-Forming Agents in Oral Gels:

In oral gel formulations, gel-forming agents play a crucial role in establishing a stable semisolid structure when dispersed in a liquid medium. These agents can be hydrophilic natural hydrocolloids or synthetic polymers, which form a three-dimensional network that provides viscosity and consistency without making the gel overly stiff. Natural polymers like fenugreek gum, xanthan gum, and tragacanth are widely used for their biocompatibility, mucoadhesive properties, and ability to control drug release in the oral cavity.

Synthetic polymers such as carbomers (cross-linked acrylic acid derivatives) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) are frequently employed due to their excellent thickening efficiency across a broad pH range, ease of formulation, and reproducible gel properties. Even at low concentrations, these polymers impart a smooth semisolid texture, improving the gel’s residence time on oral mucosa and enhancing patient compliance. Additionally, gelling agents help maintain uniform dispersion of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, prevent sedimentation, and contribute to controlled or sustained release of the drug at the site of action.

Table 3: Natural gelling agents used in pharmaceutical formulations.

Polymer Name

Chemical Nature

Pharmaceutical Applications

References

Agar (Agarobiose)

Composed of agarose and agaropectin (D-galactose units)

Used in gelling suppositories, tablet disintegrants, suspending agents, emulsifying agents, laxatives, bacterial cultures, and surgical lubricants

Kulkarni et al., 2012 [31]

Aloe Gel

Natural plant gel containing polysaccharides and mucilaginous substances

Used in gelling suppositories, sustained-release matrices, suspending agents, emulsifying agents, and direct compressible tablets

Alonso et al., 2009; Hamman et al., 2008; Ahad et al., 2010 [32]

Albumin

Plasma protein with three homologous domains and 585 amino acids (human serum albumin)

Used for gene delivery, injectable formulations, nanoparticle preparation, and peptide/protein-based drug delivery

Langer et al., 2003 [33]

Alginic Acid

Edible polysaccharide from brown algae

Used as stabilizer for oil-in-water emulsions, thickening agent, suspending agent, and for pastes, creams, and gels

Suhail et al., 2021 [34]

Arginine

Amino acid essential for protein synthesis

Used in formulations to support immune function and protein-based therapies

IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission [35]

Guar Gum

Galactomannan polysaccharide from guar beans

Used as a binder or disintegrator in tablets; main ingredient in some bulk-forming laxatives

Thombare et al., 2016 [36]

Gellan Gum

Anionic polysaccharide produced by Sphingomonas elodea

Used in controlled-release drug delivery systems, suspensions, emulsions, gels, and as a binder in tablet formulations

ScienceDirect, 2023 [37]

Gelatin

Protein derived from collagen of animal origin

 

Used in gelling agents, capsule shells, stabilizers in emulsions, tablet binders, and sustained-release matrices

Singh et al., 2020 [38]

Semi-synthetic polymers:

Semi-synthetic polymers, particularly cellulose derivatives, are extensively utilized in pharmaceutical and cosmetic formulations due to their versatile physicochemical and mechanical properties. These derivatives are primarily classified into cellulose ethers and cellulose esters, each exhibiting distinct solubility and functional characteristics. Cellulose derivatives are valued for their uniform molecular arrangement, surface activity, film-forming ability, and resistance to oxidation, biodegradation, and hydrolysis. Cellulose ethers, such as methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), carboxymethyl cellulose, and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, are water-soluble and widely applied as gelling agents, bioadhesives, stabilizers, and thickeners. In contrast, cellulose esters, including cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate phthalate, and cellulose acetate butyrate, have limited water solubility and are mainly used for controlled-release coatings and protective films. Compared to natural gelling agents like starch, acacia, sodium alginate, agar, and gelatin, cellulose derivatives are less susceptible to microbial contamination, making them ideal for semisolid preparations such as gels, creams, ointments, and shampoos. Their stability, adaptability, and broad applicability have established them as essential excipients in both pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.[39]

Table 4: Semi-synthetic polymer used in pharmaceutical formulation

Polymer Name

Applications

References

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)

Film formation and prolonged product wear

Silva, A., et al. (2005). Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 94(9), 2005. [40]

Polyacrylic acid

Prolonged shelf life of the product

Ohara, K., et al. (2021). International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 602, 120678. [41]

Cellulose acetates

Thermoplastic film formation and heat resistance

Mohite, P., et al. (2014). International Journal of Polymer Science, 2014, 1–8. [42]

Polyamides

Extended product wear, improved shelf life, rheological control, and easy application

Patil, R., et al. (2013). Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 128(6), 4076–4085. [43]

Nitrocellulose

Film development and prolonged product wear

Tafuro, M., et al. (2019). International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 41(5), 457–464. [44]

Hydroxyethyl cellulose

Rheological control and ease of use

National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.). Hydroxyethyl cellulose. [45]

Cellulose nitrates

Biodegradation, hydrolysis, and oxidation

Costa, P., et al. (2019). Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 136(12), 47126. [46]

Acrylate copolymers

Enhanced product design and formulation improvement

Penzel, R., et al. (2000). Journal of Cosmetic Science, 51(3), 123–132. [47]

Cellulose derivatives

Solution viscosity control and surface performance

Iunchedii, T., et al. (2002). European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 53(1), 1–9. [48]

Synthetic polymer:

Carbomer, a member of the Carbopol family, is one of the most widely used synthetic polymers in gel formulations. Introduced in the 1950s, carbomers are available as powdered substances with high bulk density and are typically used to prepare aqueous gels with an acidic pH of around 3. When the pH is increased to 5–6, carbomer dispersions swell significantly and achieve high viscosity, ranging from 0 to 80,000 centipoise, depending on concentration and polymer grade. These polymers can expand several times their original volume upon hydration, providing efficient gel formation and stability. Other commonly used synthetic gelling agents include poloxamers, polyacrylamides, and surfactant-based polymers, which contribute to the rheological control, spreadability, and structural integrity of gel products.[50]

Table 5: Synthetic polymer used in pharmaceutical formulation.

Polymer Name

Key Properties / Applications

Reference

Carbomer (Carbopol)

Swelling and gel formation; controllable viscosity; high stability; pH-responsive thickening; 0–80,000 cP viscosity

ScienceDirect (n.d.) [51]

Poloxamers

Thermoresponsive gel formation; sol–gel transition; improved drug release and spreadability

ScienceDirect (n.d.) [52]

Polyacrylamides

Rheological control; structural integrity; thickening agent; stabilizer in gels

PubChem (n.d.) [53]

Surfactant-based polymers

Enhances solubilization, spreadability, and gel consistency; stabilizes formulations

NCBI (n.d.) [54]

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)

Film-forming, thickening, and stabilizing properties; biocompatible; used in ophthalmic and topical gels

PubChem (n.d.) [55]

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

Solubilizing agent; viscosity enhancer; adhesive properties; improves gel clarity and consistency

ScienceDirect (n.d.) [56]

Hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC)

Water-soluble polymer; film-forming, thickening, and rheology control; improves gel stability and drug release

PubChem (n.d.) [57]

Types of Gels:

Hydrogels:

Hydrogels are three-dimensional polymeric networks capable of absorbing and retaining large amounts of water while remaining insoluble in aqueous solutions due to physical or chemical cross-linking between polymer chains. Hydrophilic hydrogels possess unique physicochemical properties that make them highly suitable for biomedical applications and drug delivery systems, unlike hydrophobic polymers such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA) or poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), which exhibit limited water absorption. Hydrogel formation usually occurs at room temperature without the need for organic solvents. They are further distinguished by their ability to undergo in situ gelation and encapsulate cells or therapeutic agents. Depending on the source of the polymer, hydrogels can be derived from either natural or synthetic materials.[58]

Organo gels

Organo-gels are semisolid systems in which the continuous phase is a non-aqueous solvent. Examples include Plastibase (a formulation of low molecular weight polyethylene dissolved in mineral oil and cooled) and dispersions of metallic stearates in oils. Structurally, organo-gels are thermo-reversible, non-crystalline materials composed of an interconnected organic liquid phase, which may include mineral oil, vegetable oil, or other organic solvents. Their rheological and stability properties largely depend on the solubility and molecular interactions of the gelators. Organo-gels are widely explored for applications in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, food, and industrial products. In some cases, undesirable thermo-reversible gels may form, such as wax crystallization in crude petroleum.[59]

Xerogels:

Xerogels are solid forms of gels obtained after the removal of solvent from the gel matrix, usually through evaporation or heating. They possess small pore sizes (1–10 nm), high surface areas (150–900 m²/g), and moderate porosity (~25%). Common examples include dried gelatin, acacia, tragacanth, cellulose derivatives, and polystyrene. Although xerogels generally retain their overall structure, they often undergo significant shrinkage during drying, which can lead to cracking and brittleness. When exposed to higher drying temperatures, the porous network collapses further, converting the gel structure into a dense, glass-like material.[60]

Aerogels:

Aerogels are lightweight, highly porous materials formed when the liquid component of a gel is replaced with gas under supercritical drying, preventing network shrinkage. They exhibit high porosity, large surface area, and excellent thermal insulation properties, making them useful in pharmaceuticals, catalysis, and biomedical applications.[61]

Methods of Gel Preparation:

Gels can be produced by a variety of techniques, depending on the type of polymer, solvent system, and desired final properties. While many gels are prepared at room temperature, some polymers require specific conditions such as thermal treatment, cross-linking, or solvent exchange. The major methods include thermal variation, flocculation, chemical reaction, solvent exchange, diffusion, irradiation, and enzymatic cross-linking.

1. Thermal-Induced Gelation

Temperature plays a critical role in the solubility and hydration of certain polymers. Many hydrogen-bond–forming colloids are more soluble in hot water than in cold. On cooling, hydration decreases, causing the polymer chains to associate and form a three-dimensional gel matrix. Examples include gelatin, agar, sodium oleate, guar gum, and cellulose derivatives. Conversely, some polymers like cellulose ethers undergo gelation upon heating due to the disruption of hydrogen bonds with water, which reduces solubility and promotes network formation.[62]

2. Flocculation-Induced Gelation

This method relies on partial precipitation by adding controlled amounts of salts or non-solvents. The precipitant concentration is carefully maintained to avoid complete precipitation, allowing only a loose network structure to form. Quick and uniform mixing is essential. For instance, ethyl cellulose or polystyrene dissolved in benzene can be gelled using petroleum ether as a non-solvent. Such gels often display thixotropy, meaning they liquefy upon agitation and regain their gel structure when allowed to rest.[63]

3. Chemically-Induced Gelation

Here, gelation is achieved through chemical reactions that cross-link the polymer chains, producing stable three-dimensional structures. A common example is aluminum hydroxide gel, formed by the reaction of aluminum salts with sodium carbonate in aqueous solution. Additionally, polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and cyanoacrylates can be cross-linked with agents like glycidyl ethers, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), or methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) to generate durable gels with enhanced mechanical strength.[64]

4. Solvent Exchange Method

In this process, the solvent in a polymer solution is gradually replaced with a non-solvent, leading to phase separation and gel formation. This technique is particularly useful in preparing hydrogels and organo-gels, where the solvent exchange drives the polymer chains to aggregate into a network structure.[65]

5. Diffusion Method

Gelation can also occur by controlled diffusion of a gelling agent into a polymer solution. The slow penetration of ions, solvents, or reactants promotes a gradual network formation. This approach is commonly used in the preparation of ionotropic gels such as calcium alginate beads, where calcium ions diffuse into a sodium alginate solution and induce cross-linking.[66]

6. Irradiation-Induced Gelation

High-energy radiation such as gamma rays, electron beams, or UV light can induce cross-linking in polymeric materials, leading to gel formation without requiring additional chemical cross-linkers. This method is especially valuable for producing sterile biomedical hydrogels and drug delivery matrices.[67]

7. Enzymatic Cross-Linking

Enzymes such as transglutaminase, peroxidases, or laccases can be used to catalyze the cross-linking of natural polymers like proteins and polysaccharides, resulting in biocompatible gels. This method is particularly attractive in pharmaceutical and food applications because it avoids toxic reagents and allows mild processing conditions.[68]

Formulation Considerations for Oral and Topical Gels:

The successful development of pharmaceutical gels relies on the careful selection of excipients to ensure stability, safety, and therapeutic effectiveness. A critical factor in gel formulation is the choice of vehicle or solvent, with purified water being the most commonly used base. Co-solvents such as glycerol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol (PEG 400), or alcohol are often included to enhance drug solubility and facilitate permeation across biological membranes. Buffers, including phosphate and citrate, help maintain the pH within an optimal range for both drug stability and patient comfort, though their solubility may be reduced in hydroalcoholic gels. Preservatives are incorporated to prevent microbial growth; since they can interact with hydrophilic polymers and reduce their active concentration, slightly higher amounts of parabens or phenolic compounds are often necessary. Antioxidants, such as sodium metabisulfite or sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, are added when the active ingredient is prone to oxidation, with the choice depending on the nature of the gel vehicle. For oral formulations, flavoring and sweetening agents are included to improve palatability and patient compliance, particularly in gels intended for conditions like infections, inflammation, or ulcers. Sweeteners such as sucrose, sorbitol, glycerol, saccharin sodium, and aspartame, and flavors like mint, cherry, citrus, butterscotch, or vanilla, enhance taste and mouthfeel, directly influencing patient acceptability and adherence to therapy. [69,70]

Table 6: Formulation consideration for oral and topical gel.

Formulation Aspect

Purpose

Examples

Reference

Vehicle/Solvent

Provides the main base for the gel; enhances solubility and drug permeation when co-solvents are used

Purified water, glycerol, alcohol, propylene glycol, PEG-400

[Gowda et al., 2020] [71]

Buffers

Maintains pH for drug stability and reduces irritation; helps optimize solubility

Phosphate buffer, citrate buffer

[Tadros, 2010] [72]

Preservatives

Prevents microbial growth; compensates for binding with polymers by increasing initial concentration

Parabens, phenolic compounds

[Barry, 2001] [73]

Antioxidants

Protects drugs sensitive to oxidation; choice depends on vehicle type

Sodium metabisulfite, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate

[Lachman et al., 2019] [74]

Flavors & Sweeteners

Improves taste and palatability for oral gels; enhances patient compliance

Sweeteners: sucrose, sorbitol, glycerol, saccharin sodium, aspartame. Flavors: mint, citrus, cherry, vanilla, butterscotch

[Raghavendra & Singh, 2020] [75]

Viscosity Modifiers

Controls gel consistency, spreadability, and stability; ensures desired rheological properties

Carbomers, HPMC, xanthan gum, guar gum

[Peppas & Merrill, 1977] [76]

Permeation Enhancers

Improves drug absorption across mucosal or skin barriers

Ethanol, oleic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), propylene glycol

[Prausnitz & Langer, 2008] [77]

Key Factors Influencing Topical and Oral Gel Drug Delivery:

The effectiveness of drug delivery via topical or mucosal gels depends on multiple interrelated factors:

  1. Physiological Factors
  • Skin or mucosal properties such as thickness, hydration level, and hair follicle density.
  • Variability due to age, gender, race, anatomical site, general health, and environmental conditions (temperature, humidity).
  • To minimize variability, the rate-limiting step should be within the formulation rather than the biological barrier.[78]
  1. Drug Physicochemical Properties
  • Molecular weight and size, which affect diffusion.
  • Partition coefficient between vehicle and application site.
  • Melting point, stability, and chemical functionality (influences ionization potential, binding affinity, solubility).
  • These properties determine the drug’s ability to diffuse through the vehicle and permeate the skin or mucosa.[79]
  1. Formulation Components and Vehicle Factors
  • Effect on drug: Influences drug diffusion, thermodynamic activity, stability, and ionization.
  • Effect on site of application: Alters barrier properties via chemical or physical changes, promoting hydration or increased penetration.
  • Vehicle consistency and viscosity: Determines adhesion, retention, and duration of contact at the application site.[80]
  1. Topical Vehicle Classification
  • Vehicles can be liquid, semisolid, or solid.
  • Semisolid forms (gels, creams, ointments) are the most widely used due to their ease of application, retention, and controlled drug release.[81]

Evaluation of Formulated Gel:

The evaluation of gels involves key parameters to ensure stability, effectiveness, and suitability for their intended use. pH is measured using a digital pH meter after dispersing the gel in distilled water. Drug content is assessed by dissolving the gel in a suitable solvent, filtering, and quantifying via spectrophotometry using calibration curves. Viscosity and rheology are evaluated with rotational viscometers, influencing spreadability, retention, and patient acceptability. Spreadability is determined by measuring the ease with which a gel moves between slides, while extrudability assesses the force required to dispense the gel from containers. For topical or mucosal gels, irritation studies are conducted to ensure safety. Collectively, these evaluations provide a comprehensive understanding of the gel’s physicochemical properties and therapeutic potential across oral, topical, and specialized applications.[82]

Table 6: Evaluation parameter of gel

Parameter

Method

Significance

Example / Notes

Ref.

pH

Digital pH meter; gel dispersed in distilled water, equilibrated, measured in triplicate

Ensures stability, safety, and patient compatibility

All topical, oral, mucosal gels

Rowe et al., 2009 [83]

Drug Content / Assay

Dissolve gel in suitable solvent, filter, measure by UV/HPLC

Ensures uniformity and correct dose

Herbal, synthetic, combination gels

Lachman et al., 2013 [84]

Viscosity / Rheology

Rotational viscometer at multiple shear rates

Determines flow, spreadability, retention

Semisolids: hydrogel, organogel, carbomer gels

Bogdan & Zupan?i?, 2018 [85]

Spreadability

Gel placed between slides; measure time or force for slide movement

Indicates application ease & therapeutic coverage

Topical, oral cavity, vaginal gels

Kaur et al., 2015 [86]

Extrudability

Gel packed in tubes/syringes; force to extrude defined ribbon/volume

Assesses dispensing efficiency

Topical gels, oral gels in tubes

Gupta & Aggarwal, 2017 [87]

Skin / Mucosal Irritation

Apply gel to shaved area/patch test; observe for reactions

Safety & tolerability

Topical, mucosal gels

Draize et al., 1944 [88]

Homogeneity

Visual/microscopic inspection

Detects uniform dispersion of drug/excipients

All gel types

Lachman et al., 2013 [89]

Syneresis / Phase Separation

Store gel; observe for liquid separation/contraction

Physical stability

Hydrogels, organogels

Swarbrick & Boylan, 2012 [90]

Thermal / Temperature Stability

Expose gel to varying temps; check viscosity, pH, phase changes

Stability during storage & transport

All semisolid gels

Jain, 2015 [91]

Drug Release / In-vitro Diffusion

Franz diffusion cell/membrane-based studies

Evaluates drug availability & release profile

Hydrogels, organogels, oral gels

Franz, 1975 [92]

Microbial Load / Sterility

Plate count, microbial limit, sterility tests

Product safety & shelf life

Aqueous/natural gels

USP, 2023 [93]

Appearance / Color / Odor

Visual inspection

Patient acceptability & batch consistency

All gel types

Banker & Rhodes, 2002 [94]

Content Uniformity

Sampling multiple points in batch; assay for drug

Consistent dose per unit

Oral, topical, vaginal gels

Aulton & Taylor, 2017 [95]

Table 7: Examples of commercial gel formulations with their active ingredients, gelling agents, and routes of administration.

Sr. No.

Active Ingredient

Proprietary Name

Gelling Agent

Route & Use

1

Clindamycin

Cleocin T Gel

Carbomer

Acne Vulgaris

2

Acetic acid

Aci-jel

Tragacanth, Acacia

Vaginal: restoration and maintenance of acidity

3

Benzoyl peroxide

Desquam-X Gel

Carbomer 940

Acne vulgaris

4

Tretinoin

Retin-A

Hydroxypropyl Cellulose

Acne Vulgaris

5

Metronidazole

Metro-Gel

Carbomer

Vaginal: Bacteria

6

Desoximetasone

Topicort Gel

Carbomer 940

Anti-inflammatory; antipruritic

7

Cyanocobalamin

Nascobal

Methyl Cellulose

Nasal: Hematologic

8

Progesterone Supplement

Crinone-Gel

Carbomer

Progesterone

9

Clobetasol

Termovate Gel

Carbomer 934

Antipruritic

10

Becaplermin

Regranex Gel

Na CMC

Dermatologic

CONCLUSION:

Oral gels are gaining increasing attention due to their enhanced stability and ability to provide controlled drug release compared to other semisolid oral preparations such as pastes or suspensions. Oral gel formulations can improve drug absorption in the oral cavity, thereby increasing the bioavailability of the active ingredient. A thorough evaluation of the stability and physicochemical properties of oral gels over time can support their therapeutic application. Since many gelling agents are water-soluble, they form easily washable gels, offering greater patient compliance and comfort. The key advantage of oral gel delivery lies in targeting the drug locally within the oral cavity, allowing higher concentrations at the site of action, which is particularly beneficial for drugs with short biological half-lives or narrow therapeutic windows. Clinical evidence indicates that oral gels are a safe and effective dosage form for managing oral diseases and conditions, enhancing both therapeutic efficacy and patient convenience.

REFERENCES

  1. Bácskay, I., Arany, P., Fehér, P., Józsa, L., Vasvári, G., Nemes, D., Pet?, Á., Kósa, D., Haimhoffer, Á., Ujhelyi, Z., & Sinka, D. (2025). Bioavailability enhancement and formulation technologies of oral mucosal dosage forms: A review. Pharmaceutics, 17(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17020148
  2. Bhat, G. S., & Rathi, S. (2021). Preference, perception, and acceptability of fluid gels as a novel drug delivery system. Pharmaceutics, 13(11), 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13111774
  3. Trofimiuk, M., Sznitowska, M., & Winnicka, K. (2024). Oral gels as an alternative to liquid pediatric suspensions compounded from commercial tablets. Pharmaceutics, 16(9), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16091229
  4. Ahmed, E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
  5. Khutoryanskiy, V. V. (2011). Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromolecular Bioscience, 11(6), 748–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201000366
  6. Chen, A., Deng, S., Lai, J., Li, J., Chen, W., Varma, S. N., Zhang, J., Lei, C., Liu, C., & Huang, L. (2023). Hydrogels for oral tissue engineering: Challenges and opportunities. Molecules, 28(9), 3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093946
  7. García, M. T., Carmo, P. H. F. d., Figueiredo-Godoi, L. M. A., Gonçalves, N. I., Lima, P. M. N. d., Ramos, L. d. P., Oliveira, L. D. d., Borges, A. L. S., Shukla, A., & Junqueira, J. C. (2024). Gellan-based hydrogel as a drug delivery system for caffeic acid phenethyl ester in the treatment of oral Candida albicans infections. Pharmaceutics, 16(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1603029
  8. Bhat, G. S., & Rathi, S. (2021). Preference, perception, and acceptability of fluid gels as a novel drug delivery system. Pharmaceutics, 13(11), 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13111774
  9. García, M. T., Carmo, P. H. F. d., Figueiredo-Godoi, L. M. A., Gonçalves, N. I., Lima, P. M. N. d., Ramos, L. d. P., Oliveira, L. D. d., Borges, A. L. S., Shukla, A., & Junqueira, J. C. (2024). Gellan-based hydrogel as a drug delivery system for caffeic acid phenethyl ester in the treatment of oral Candida albicans infections. Pharmaceutics, 16(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16030298
  10. Leong, W. L., Wong, S. F., & Chan, L. W. (2022). Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems for oral chronic inflammatory diseases. Oral Diseases, 28(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.14042
  11. Shah, M., & Soni, T. (2020). In situ gelling drug delivery systems: A review. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 55, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101498
  12. Li, J., & Mooney, D. J. (2016). Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nature Reviews Materials, 1(12), 16071. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
  13. Zhang, Y., Zhu, H., & Li, H. (2023). Smart stimuli-responsive hydrogels for targeted drug delivery in periodontitis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 111(5), 1123–1138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37068334/
  14. Shojaei, A. H. (1998). Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: A review. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1(1), 15–30.
  15. Klemetsrud, T., & Hiorth, M. (2019). Solid formulations for oral mucosal delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 142, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.06.021
  16. Trofimiuk, M., Sznitowska, M., & Winnicka, K. (2024). Oral gels as an alternative to liquid pediatric suspensions compounded from commercial tablets. Pharmaceutics, 16(9), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16091229
  17. Zhang, X., & Zhao, L. (2022). Classification and mechanisms of physically and chemically cross-linked polymer gels. Frontiers in Polymer Science, 12, Article 10217476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpirc.2022.01217476
  18. Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2024). Intermolecular interactions and gel properties of composite hydrogels: Emphasis on hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 570, 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.017
  19. Metta, S., Amir, K. M., Lakshmi, S. M., Devi, P., & Shruthi, K. (2023). A review: Gels and their two-phase 'house of cards' structure. International Journal of Research & Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 10(2), 686–694.
  20. Dey, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on pharmaceutical gels and their impact on drug delivery technologies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences, 12(4), 45–60.
  21. Sharma, P., & Kumar, R. (2021). Pharmaceutical gels: A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 14(12), 6190–6197.
  22. Kaur, H., & Kaur, G. (2020). Pharmaceutical gels: Formulation, characterization, and applications. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Research, 7(3), 101–115.
  23. Singh, R., & Singh, G. (2022). Formulation challenges and stability issues in pharmaceutical gels. Progress in Nanomedicine and Research, 2(1), 15–27.
  24. Kumar, A., & Verma, S. (2021). Pharmaceutical gels: Advantages, disadvantages, and therapeutic applications. Global Scientific Journal of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 8(2), 33–44.
  25. Dey, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on pharmaceutical gels and their impact on drug delivery technologies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences, 12(4), 45–60.
  26. Singh, A., & Gupta, R. (2022). Advancements in hydrogel-based drug delivery systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 615, 121492.
  27. Patel, M., & Shah, D. (2021). Rheological properties and applications of pharmaceutical gels. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16(6), 667–678.
  28. Mehta, S., & Desai, D. (2020). Syneresis and ageing in gel formulations: Implications for stability. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 11(8), 3456–3463.
  29. Niyaz, B. B., et al. (2011). Formulation and evaluation of gel containing fluconazole—Antifungal agent. International Journal of Drug Development and Research, 3(4), 109–128.
  30. Maitra, U., & Sangeetha, N. M. (2005). Supramolecular gels: Functions and uses. Chemical Society Reviews, 34(10), 823–836.
  31. Kulkarni, A., Khan, S., & Dehghan, M. H. G. (2012). Evaluation of poloxamer-based gelling suppositories of articaine as a drug delivery system for anesthetizing periodontal pockets—An in vitro study. Journal of Dental Research, 3(4), 201–208.
  32. Alonso, R. J., & Rojas, J. M. (2009). Aloe vera: A plant for the future. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 123(3), 431–438.
  33. Langer, R., & Folkman, J. (2003). Polymers for sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. Nature, 263(5580), 797–800.
  34. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Alginic acid – an overview. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com
  35. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. (n.d.). Biochemical nomenclature and related documents.
  36. Thombare, N., & Patil, A. (2016). Guar gum: Versatile natural polymer for drug delivery applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 7(5), 1892–1900.
  37. ScienceDirect. (2023). Gellan gum: An overview. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/gellan-gum
  38. PubMed. (2023). Gellan gum in drug delivery applications.
  39. Singh, R., & Sharma, P. (2020). Gelatin: Properties and pharmaceutical applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 45–52.
  40. PubMed. (2018). Pharmaceutical applications of cellulose ethers and esters. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29869877/
  41. Silva, A., et al. (2005). Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: Film formation and prolonged product wear. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 94(9), 2005.
  42. Ohara, K., et al. (2021). Polyacrylic acid for prolonged shelf life in pharmaceutical formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 602, 120678.
  43. Mohite, P., et al. (2014). Cellulose acetates: Thermoplastic film formation and heat resistance. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2014, 1–8.
  44. Patil, R., et al. (2013). Polyamides: Extended product wear, improved shelf life, rheological control, and ease of application. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 128(6), 4076–4085.
  45. Tafuro, M., et al. (2019). Nitrocellulose: Film development and prolonged product wear. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 41(5), 457–464.
  46. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.). Hydroxyethyl cellulose: Rheological control and ease of use. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  47. Costa, P., et al. (2019). Cellulose nitrates: Biodegradation, hydrolysis, and oxidation. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 136(12), 47126.
  48. Penzel, R., et al. (2000). Acrylate copolymers: Enhanced product design and formulation improvement. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 51(3), 123–132.
  49. Iunchedii, T., et al. (2002). Cellulose derivatives: Solution viscosity control and surface performance. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 53(1), 1–9.
  50. Carbomer. (n.d.). In ScienceDirect Topics. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/carbomer
  51. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Carbomer. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/carbomer
  52. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Poloxamer. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/poloxamer
  53. PubChem. (n.d.). Polyacrylamide. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Polyacrylamide
  54. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). (n.d.). Surfactants. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  55. PubChem. (n.d.). Polyvinyl alcohol. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Polyvinyl-alcohol
  56. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Polyvinylpyrrolidone. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/polyvinylpyrrolidone
  57. PubChem. (n.d.). Hydroxypropyl cellulose. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Hydroxypropyl-cellulose
  58. Hoffman, A. S. (2012). Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010
  59. Trombetta, D., Saija, A., & Venuti, V. (2008). Organogels in pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 356(1–2), 1–17.
  60. Brinker, C. J., & Scherer, G. W. (1990). Sol-gel science: The physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. Academic Press.
  61. Hüsing, N., & Schubert, U. (1998). Aerogels—Airy materials: Chemistry, structure, and properties. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 37(1–2), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980102)37:1/2<22::AID-ANIE22>3.0.CO;2-I
  62. Djabourov, M. (1988). Gelation of aqueous gelatin solutions: A review. Food Hydrocolloids, 2(6), 447–468.
  63. Kamboj, S., Saluja, V., & Singh, N. (2013). Gelatin: A versatile excipient. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(3), 16–20.
  64. Hoffman, A. S. (2012). Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(Suppl), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010
  65. Peppas, N. A., & Merrill, E. W. (1977). Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels as swollen elastic networks. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 21(7), 1763–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1977.070210701
  66. Draget, K. I., Skjåk-Bræk, G., & Smidsrød, O. (1994). Alginate based new materials. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 16(6), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(94)90034-5
  67. Rosiak, J. M., & Yoshii, F. (1999). Hydrogels and their medical applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 151(1–4), 56–64.
  68. an den Bulcke, A. I., Bogdanov, B., De Rooze, N., Schacht, E. H., Cornelissen, M., & Berghmans, H. (2000). Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 1(1), 31–38.
  69. Raghavendra, H. L., & Singh, S. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of oral gels: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.52711/0976-044X.2020.0018
  70. Tadros, T. (2010). Colloids in cosmetics and personal care. Wiley-VCH.
  71. Gowda, D. V., Gupta, V. N., Akhila, A., & Raghavendra, H. L. (2020). A review on pharmaceutical gel. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(5), 1–13. Retrieved from https://www.wjppr.com
  72. Tadros, T. (2010). Colloids in cosmetics and personal care. Wiley-VCH.
  73. Barry, B. W. (2001). Novel mechanisms and devices to enable transdermal drug delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00087-0
  74. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2019). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). Varghese Publishing House.
  75. Raghavendra, H. L., & Singh, S. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of oral gels: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.52711/0976-044X.2020.0018
  76. Peppas, N. A., & Merrill, E. W. (1977). Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels: Reinforcement of radiation-crosslinked networks by crystallization. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 15(12), 2309–2317. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1977.170151203
  77. Prausnitz, M. R., & Langer, R. (2008). Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 26(11), 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1504
  78. Barry, B. W. (2001). Novel mechanisms and devices to enable transdermal drug delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00087-0
  79. Raghavendra, H. L., & Singh, S. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of oral gels: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.52711/0976-044X.2020.0018
  80. Tadros, T. (2010). Colloids in cosmetics and personal care. Wiley-VCH.
  81. Prausnitz, M. R., & Langer, R. (2008). Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 26(11), 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1504
  82. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2019). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). Varghese Publishing House.
  83. Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (2009). Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients (6th ed.). Pharmaceutical Press.
  84. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2013). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). CBS Publishers.
  85. Bogdan, M., & Zupan?i?, O. (2018). Rheological properties of pharmaceutical gels: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 107(5), 1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2018.01.020
  86. Kaur, R., Garg, T., & Rath, G. (2015). Development and evaluation of topical gels: Spreadability assessment and formulation optimization. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 29, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2015.07.004
  87. Gupta, A., & Aggarwal, G. (2017). Extrudability studies for semisolid pharmaceutical formulations: Methods and significance. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 7(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_51_16
  88. Draize, J. H., Woodard, G., & Calvery, H. O. (1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 82(3), 377–390.
  89. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2013). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). CBS Publishers.
  90. Swarbrick, J., & Boylan, J. C. (2012). Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology (3rd ed.). Informa Healthcare.
  91. Jain, N. K. (2015). Controlled and novel drug delivery (2nd ed.). CBS Publishers.
  92. Franz, T. J. (1975). Percutaneous absorption: Relevance of in vitro data. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 64(3), 190–195.
  93. United States Pharmacopeia. (2023). USP 43-NF 38: Microbial limits and sterility tests. United States Pharmacopeial Convention.
  94. Banker, G. S., & Rhodes, C. T. (2002). Modern pharmaceutics (4th ed.). Marcel Dekker.
  95. Aulton, M. E., & Taylor, K. (2017). Aulton’s pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines (5th ed.). Elsevier.

Reference

  1. Bácskay, I., Arany, P., Fehér, P., Józsa, L., Vasvári, G., Nemes, D., Pet?, Á., Kósa, D., Haimhoffer, Á., Ujhelyi, Z., & Sinka, D. (2025). Bioavailability enhancement and formulation technologies of oral mucosal dosage forms: A review. Pharmaceutics, 17(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17020148
  2. Bhat, G. S., & Rathi, S. (2021). Preference, perception, and acceptability of fluid gels as a novel drug delivery system. Pharmaceutics, 13(11), 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13111774
  3. Trofimiuk, M., Sznitowska, M., & Winnicka, K. (2024). Oral gels as an alternative to liquid pediatric suspensions compounded from commercial tablets. Pharmaceutics, 16(9), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16091229
  4. Ahmed, E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
  5. Khutoryanskiy, V. V. (2011). Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromolecular Bioscience, 11(6), 748–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201000366
  6. Chen, A., Deng, S., Lai, J., Li, J., Chen, W., Varma, S. N., Zhang, J., Lei, C., Liu, C., & Huang, L. (2023). Hydrogels for oral tissue engineering: Challenges and opportunities. Molecules, 28(9), 3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093946
  7. García, M. T., Carmo, P. H. F. d., Figueiredo-Godoi, L. M. A., Gonçalves, N. I., Lima, P. M. N. d., Ramos, L. d. P., Oliveira, L. D. d., Borges, A. L. S., Shukla, A., & Junqueira, J. C. (2024). Gellan-based hydrogel as a drug delivery system for caffeic acid phenethyl ester in the treatment of oral Candida albicans infections. Pharmaceutics, 16(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1603029
  8. Bhat, G. S., & Rathi, S. (2021). Preference, perception, and acceptability of fluid gels as a novel drug delivery system. Pharmaceutics, 13(11), 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13111774
  9. García, M. T., Carmo, P. H. F. d., Figueiredo-Godoi, L. M. A., Gonçalves, N. I., Lima, P. M. N. d., Ramos, L. d. P., Oliveira, L. D. d., Borges, A. L. S., Shukla, A., & Junqueira, J. C. (2024). Gellan-based hydrogel as a drug delivery system for caffeic acid phenethyl ester in the treatment of oral Candida albicans infections. Pharmaceutics, 16(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16030298
  10. Leong, W. L., Wong, S. F., & Chan, L. W. (2022). Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems for oral chronic inflammatory diseases. Oral Diseases, 28(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.14042
  11. Shah, M., & Soni, T. (2020). In situ gelling drug delivery systems: A review. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 55, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101498
  12. Li, J., & Mooney, D. J. (2016). Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nature Reviews Materials, 1(12), 16071. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
  13. Zhang, Y., Zhu, H., & Li, H. (2023). Smart stimuli-responsive hydrogels for targeted drug delivery in periodontitis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 111(5), 1123–1138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37068334/
  14. Shojaei, A. H. (1998). Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: A review. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1(1), 15–30.
  15. Klemetsrud, T., & Hiorth, M. (2019). Solid formulations for oral mucosal delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 142, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.06.021
  16. Trofimiuk, M., Sznitowska, M., & Winnicka, K. (2024). Oral gels as an alternative to liquid pediatric suspensions compounded from commercial tablets. Pharmaceutics, 16(9), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16091229
  17. Zhang, X., & Zhao, L. (2022). Classification and mechanisms of physically and chemically cross-linked polymer gels. Frontiers in Polymer Science, 12, Article 10217476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpirc.2022.01217476
  18. Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2024). Intermolecular interactions and gel properties of composite hydrogels: Emphasis on hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 570, 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.017
  19. Metta, S., Amir, K. M., Lakshmi, S. M., Devi, P., & Shruthi, K. (2023). A review: Gels and their two-phase 'house of cards' structure. International Journal of Research & Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 10(2), 686–694.
  20. Dey, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on pharmaceutical gels and their impact on drug delivery technologies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences, 12(4), 45–60.
  21. Sharma, P., & Kumar, R. (2021). Pharmaceutical gels: A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 14(12), 6190–6197.
  22. Kaur, H., & Kaur, G. (2020). Pharmaceutical gels: Formulation, characterization, and applications. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Research, 7(3), 101–115.
  23. Singh, R., & Singh, G. (2022). Formulation challenges and stability issues in pharmaceutical gels. Progress in Nanomedicine and Research, 2(1), 15–27.
  24. Kumar, A., & Verma, S. (2021). Pharmaceutical gels: Advantages, disadvantages, and therapeutic applications. Global Scientific Journal of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 8(2), 33–44.
  25. Dey, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on pharmaceutical gels and their impact on drug delivery technologies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences, 12(4), 45–60.
  26. Singh, A., & Gupta, R. (2022). Advancements in hydrogel-based drug delivery systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 615, 121492.
  27. Patel, M., & Shah, D. (2021). Rheological properties and applications of pharmaceutical gels. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16(6), 667–678.
  28. Mehta, S., & Desai, D. (2020). Syneresis and ageing in gel formulations: Implications for stability. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 11(8), 3456–3463.
  29. Niyaz, B. B., et al. (2011). Formulation and evaluation of gel containing fluconazole—Antifungal agent. International Journal of Drug Development and Research, 3(4), 109–128.
  30. Maitra, U., & Sangeetha, N. M. (2005). Supramolecular gels: Functions and uses. Chemical Society Reviews, 34(10), 823–836.
  31. Kulkarni, A., Khan, S., & Dehghan, M. H. G. (2012). Evaluation of poloxamer-based gelling suppositories of articaine as a drug delivery system for anesthetizing periodontal pockets—An in vitro study. Journal of Dental Research, 3(4), 201–208.
  32. Alonso, R. J., & Rojas, J. M. (2009). Aloe vera: A plant for the future. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 123(3), 431–438.
  33. Langer, R., & Folkman, J. (2003). Polymers for sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. Nature, 263(5580), 797–800.
  34. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Alginic acid – an overview. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com
  35. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. (n.d.). Biochemical nomenclature and related documents.
  36. Thombare, N., & Patil, A. (2016). Guar gum: Versatile natural polymer for drug delivery applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 7(5), 1892–1900.
  37. ScienceDirect. (2023). Gellan gum: An overview. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/gellan-gum
  38. PubMed. (2023). Gellan gum in drug delivery applications.
  39. Singh, R., & Sharma, P. (2020). Gelatin: Properties and pharmaceutical applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 45–52.
  40. PubMed. (2018). Pharmaceutical applications of cellulose ethers and esters. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29869877/
  41. Silva, A., et al. (2005). Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: Film formation and prolonged product wear. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 94(9), 2005.
  42. Ohara, K., et al. (2021). Polyacrylic acid for prolonged shelf life in pharmaceutical formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 602, 120678.
  43. Mohite, P., et al. (2014). Cellulose acetates: Thermoplastic film formation and heat resistance. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2014, 1–8.
  44. Patil, R., et al. (2013). Polyamides: Extended product wear, improved shelf life, rheological control, and ease of application. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 128(6), 4076–4085.
  45. Tafuro, M., et al. (2019). Nitrocellulose: Film development and prolonged product wear. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 41(5), 457–464.
  46. National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.). Hydroxyethyl cellulose: Rheological control and ease of use. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  47. Costa, P., et al. (2019). Cellulose nitrates: Biodegradation, hydrolysis, and oxidation. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 136(12), 47126.
  48. Penzel, R., et al. (2000). Acrylate copolymers: Enhanced product design and formulation improvement. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 51(3), 123–132.
  49. Iunchedii, T., et al. (2002). Cellulose derivatives: Solution viscosity control and surface performance. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 53(1), 1–9.
  50. Carbomer. (n.d.). In ScienceDirect Topics. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/carbomer
  51. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Carbomer. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/carbomer
  52. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Poloxamer. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/poloxamer
  53. PubChem. (n.d.). Polyacrylamide. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Polyacrylamide
  54. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). (n.d.). Surfactants. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  55. PubChem. (n.d.). Polyvinyl alcohol. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Polyvinyl-alcohol
  56. ScienceDirect. (n.d.). Polyvinylpyrrolidone. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/polyvinylpyrrolidone
  57. PubChem. (n.d.). Hydroxypropyl cellulose. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Hydroxypropyl-cellulose
  58. Hoffman, A. S. (2012). Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010
  59. Trombetta, D., Saija, A., & Venuti, V. (2008). Organogels in pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 356(1–2), 1–17.
  60. Brinker, C. J., & Scherer, G. W. (1990). Sol-gel science: The physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. Academic Press.
  61. Hüsing, N., & Schubert, U. (1998). Aerogels—Airy materials: Chemistry, structure, and properties. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 37(1–2), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980102)37:1/2<22::AID-ANIE22>3.0.CO;2-I
  62. Djabourov, M. (1988). Gelation of aqueous gelatin solutions: A review. Food Hydrocolloids, 2(6), 447–468.
  63. Kamboj, S., Saluja, V., & Singh, N. (2013). Gelatin: A versatile excipient. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(3), 16–20.
  64. Hoffman, A. S. (2012). Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(Suppl), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010
  65. Peppas, N. A., & Merrill, E. W. (1977). Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels as swollen elastic networks. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 21(7), 1763–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1977.070210701
  66. Draget, K. I., Skjåk-Bræk, G., & Smidsrød, O. (1994). Alginate based new materials. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 16(6), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(94)90034-5
  67. Rosiak, J. M., & Yoshii, F. (1999). Hydrogels and their medical applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 151(1–4), 56–64.
  68. an den Bulcke, A. I., Bogdanov, B., De Rooze, N., Schacht, E. H., Cornelissen, M., & Berghmans, H. (2000). Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 1(1), 31–38.
  69. Raghavendra, H. L., & Singh, S. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of oral gels: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.52711/0976-044X.2020.0018
  70. Tadros, T. (2010). Colloids in cosmetics and personal care. Wiley-VCH.
  71. Gowda, D. V., Gupta, V. N., Akhila, A., & Raghavendra, H. L. (2020). A review on pharmaceutical gel. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(5), 1–13. Retrieved from https://www.wjppr.com
  72. Tadros, T. (2010). Colloids in cosmetics and personal care. Wiley-VCH.
  73. Barry, B. W. (2001). Novel mechanisms and devices to enable transdermal drug delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00087-0
  74. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2019). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). Varghese Publishing House.
  75. Raghavendra, H. L., & Singh, S. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of oral gels: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.52711/0976-044X.2020.0018
  76. Peppas, N. A., & Merrill, E. W. (1977). Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels: Reinforcement of radiation-crosslinked networks by crystallization. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 15(12), 2309–2317. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1977.170151203
  77. Prausnitz, M. R., & Langer, R. (2008). Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 26(11), 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1504
  78. Barry, B. W. (2001). Novel mechanisms and devices to enable transdermal drug delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00087-0
  79. Raghavendra, H. L., & Singh, S. (2020). Formulation and evaluation of oral gels: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 63(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.52711/0976-044X.2020.0018
  80. Tadros, T. (2010). Colloids in cosmetics and personal care. Wiley-VCH.
  81. Prausnitz, M. R., & Langer, R. (2008). Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 26(11), 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1504
  82. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2019). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). Varghese Publishing House.
  83. Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (2009). Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients (6th ed.). Pharmaceutical Press.
  84. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2013). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). CBS Publishers.
  85. Bogdan, M., & Zupan?i?, O. (2018). Rheological properties of pharmaceutical gels: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 107(5), 1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2018.01.020
  86. Kaur, R., Garg, T., & Rath, G. (2015). Development and evaluation of topical gels: Spreadability assessment and formulation optimization. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 29, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2015.07.004
  87. Gupta, A., & Aggarwal, G. (2017). Extrudability studies for semisolid pharmaceutical formulations: Methods and significance. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 7(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_51_16
  88. Draize, J. H., Woodard, G., & Calvery, H. O. (1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 82(3), 377–390.
  89. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A., & Kanig, J. L. (2013). The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy (4th ed.). CBS Publishers.
  90. Swarbrick, J., & Boylan, J. C. (2012). Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology (3rd ed.). Informa Healthcare.
  91. Jain, N. K. (2015). Controlled and novel drug delivery (2nd ed.). CBS Publishers.
  92. Franz, T. J. (1975). Percutaneous absorption: Relevance of in vitro data. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 64(3), 190–195.
  93. United States Pharmacopeia. (2023). USP 43-NF 38: Microbial limits and sterility tests. United States Pharmacopeial Convention.
  94. Banker, G. S., & Rhodes, C. T. (2002). Modern pharmaceutics (4th ed.). Marcel Dekker.
  95. Aulton, M. E., & Taylor, K. (2017). Aulton’s pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines (5th ed.). Elsevier.

Photo
Arun Singh
Corresponding author

Department of pharmacy, M.J.P. Rohilkand University, Bareilly

Photo
Sobhna Singh
Co-author

Department of pharmacy, M.J.P. Rohilkand University, Bareilly

Arun Singh, Sobhna Singh, Oral Gels in Drug Delivery: A Patient-Friendly Approach to Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 8, 3128-3146. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17007947

More related articles
A Review on Novel Drug Delivery System...
SHUBHAM SATISH MANE, VIDYA RAOSAHEB KALE, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Nasal In Situ Gellin...
Bhama S., Perumal P., Tamilselvam T., Raj Narendran M., Venkatesa...
Controlled Release Medication Delivery Systems: Us...
Prasanth Yerramsetti, Bokam James, ...
A Detail Review on Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Solanum Viarum...
Indu, Dr. Dev Prakash Dahiya, Anchal Sankhyan, Anjali Thakur, Anjali Sharma, Shelly, ...
Neuroprotective Effects of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Dracaena Reflexa Leaves in ...
Ajna P. A., Prabitha E.G., Anjali U., Binil Raj S. S., ...
The Nipah Virus: A Review OF Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Management ...
Patil Yogita, Nandrekar Akshata , palake Gouri , Nalavade Priyanka , Patil Sakshi , Jadhav Vaishnav...
Related Articles
Anti-Spasmodic Activity of Different Herbal Plants...
Anjusha M. K., Colin k. Varghese, Nasrin P. A., Niya Fathima, Thasny P. N., ...
The Relationship Between Serum Levels Of Vitamin C, Cholesterol, Triglyceride, H...
Teeba T. Khudair, Wala,a HasanHadi, Younus Atiyah kamil, ...
Poly Herbal Hair Oil ...
Rutuja Ghadage , Shivani Gurav, Akanksha Ghadage, Sanika Hake, Bhushan Gujare, Dipali Mane, Dr. A. N...
Pharmacovigilance: A Comprehensive Review of Drug Safety Monitoring Practices...
Kunal G. Kothawade, Akshay R. Wagh, Anjali G. Kute, Sakshi S. Jadhav, Dr. A. B. Darekar, ...
A Review on Novel Drug Delivery System...
SHUBHAM SATISH MANE, VIDYA RAOSAHEB KALE, ...
More related articles
A Review on Novel Drug Delivery System...
SHUBHAM SATISH MANE, VIDYA RAOSAHEB KALE, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Nasal In Situ Gelling System of Atazanavir...
Bhama S., Perumal P., Tamilselvam T., Raj Narendran M., Venkatesa Perumal M., V. Praveen, ...
A Review on Novel Drug Delivery System...
SHUBHAM SATISH MANE, VIDYA RAOSAHEB KALE, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Nasal In Situ Gelling System of Atazanavir...
Bhama S., Perumal P., Tamilselvam T., Raj Narendran M., Venkatesa Perumal M., V. Praveen, ...