View Article

Abstract

Implantable drug delivery system [IDDs] in modern medicine may traced to Deans by and Parkes who in 1938. The oral route is popular and convenient means of drug delivery . with there advantage there is also challenges. many drug are not suitable for the oral route of administration such as insulin. this article gives an overview of classification of these drug delivery devices ;the mechanism of drug release ;the materials used for manufacture. Implants are small sterile solid masses consisting of highly purified drug made by compression or molding or extrusion. Implants are developed with a view to provide continuous release of drug into the blood stream with long period of time. IDDS is used to implant drugs such as insulin, steroids. The delivery of drug by this system are various beneficial effect such as it overcome the conventional dosage form limitations, suitable for those drug which degraded by the enzymes.

Keywords

Implantable drug, modern medicine, insulin, steroids.

Introduction

With the advancement in development and technology, number of new-drug therapies have been invented, but maintaining steady therapeutic drug concentration levels, in vivo, has been a major problem. When using intermittent IV or oral-drug administration, the potential disadvantages of such drug therapies include: high plasma concentrations of drugs that may lead to toxicity or low drugs levels that cause to sub-therapeutic blood levels, and, potentially, cause drug resistance in some instances. In the past, the only way to eliminate the peak and trough plasma levels of drug therapy was by Before the initiation of implantation, however, both embryo and endometrium should embark on an elaborated process in a time- and location-specific manner. The crosstalk between a receptive uterus and a competent blastocyst can only occur during a limited time span, known as the “win of implantation” continuously IV infusing a patient at a constant rate based on the The idea of hormonal implantation in animals became standard practice in the 1950s and has been shown to increase the growth and feed efficiency of cattle [7]. This discovery sparked an interest in the area of implants leading to further studies and discoveries that have continued to the present time. It is anticipated that the demand for parenteral and implantable systems will increase 14% per year, through 1998, to $5.9 billion annually pmacokinetics of the drug.

Preconditions for implantation:

To achieve successful implantation, the uterus should undergo structural and functional remodeling. Estrogen and progesterone are the master hormones mediating these Change Estrogen and progesterone bind to their respective nuclear receptors. The progesterone receptor exists in two isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, and the estrogen receptor also exists in two isoforms, as ER? and ER?. Progesterone plays a pivotal role in implantation that allows the uterus to support the development of the embryo. The advent of advanced omics technologies provides unique insight of embryo implantation using targeted proteomics by identifying endometrial epithelial cellular and secreted protein changes in response to ovarian steroid hormones. Implantation begins with the loss of the zona pellucida known as hatching about 1-3 days after the morula enters the uterine cavity in preparation for attachment. Theactive blastocyst undergoes structure changes such that a more irregular surface with more microvilli is observed with accumulation of glycogen granules in the cytoplasm.

Implantation:

Implantation consists of three stages: (a) the blastocyst contacts the implantation site of the endometrium (apposition); (b) trophoblast cells of the blastocyst attach to the receptive endometrial epithelium (adhesion); and (c) invasive trophoblast cells cross the endometrial epithelial basement membrane and invade the endometrial stroma

METHODS OF PREPARATION OF IMPLANTS

There are mainly three methods for the preparation of implants that are discussed below:

Extrusion method

Firstly selected drug is dissolved in a suitable solvent system to produce a solution. After that polymer is added into the solution slowly and allowed to stand for 10-15 minutes for soaking purposes. The swollen material developed had been blended uniformly till it forms a dough-like material. The dough was transferred into the extruder cylinder and had been extruded in the form of long rods by the help nozzle. Implants dried the whole night at room temperature, and then cut into the optimum size and dried at 40oC

Compression Method

The polymer and drug were dissolved to develop the solution. The produced solution was subjected to freezedrying to produce a uniform cake. The cake was subjected to compression for the development of the implant. Implants have been developed by utilizing a Carver hydraulic press at a pressure of 1 metric ton, utilizing a stainless steel system developed for this objective, comprised of a 1mm diameter cylindrical punches set.

Molding Method

solution of polymer and the drug was firstly prepared in a suitable solvent system and then subjected for the lyophilization and converted to a uniform cake after that before the prepared cake was molded into rods through a Teflon sheet heated on a hot plate at a temperature about 100-120o C.

ADVANTAGES:

1.Localized delivery Drug(s) are released in immediate vicinity of implant. Action may Put be diffusion, limited to the specific location of implantation.

 2. Improved patient Compliance Patient does not need to comply with repeated and timely intake of medication throughout the implantation period. Compliance is limited to one-time implantation (and potential removal in the case of non-biodegradable implants).

3. Minimized systemic side effects Controlled release for extended periods of time and localized dosing possible with at site of action; adverse effects away from site of action are minimized; peaks and valleys in plasma drug concentration from repeated intermediate release dosing are avoided

4. Lower dose Localized implantation of site specific drugs can avoid first pass hepatic effects, thereby reducing dose required to ensure systemic bioavailability

5. Improved drug stability Protection of drug undergoing rapid degradation in the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system

Disadvantages:

1.Invasive For the insertion of the implants patient has to face either a major or a minor surgical procedure.

2.Termination non-biodegradable polymeric implants can be terminated from the body also with the help of a surgical method at the end of the treatment.

3.Danger of device failure If due to some reason the device fails to operate properly during the treatment then again surgical steps should be taken for removal of the devicefrom the patient’s body.

Current Therapeutic Applications

1.Implantable drug delivery devices have the potential to be used for a wide variety of clinical applications in areas including, but not limited to: women’s health, oncology, ocular disease, pain management, infectious disease and central nervous system disorders.

2.Women’s health is one area where implantable drug delivery devices have had a large impact, particularly in their use for contraception.

ZOLADEX [ Goserelin]

What is Zoladex? Zoladex is a man-made form of a hormone that regulates many processes in the body. Goserelin overstimulates the body's own production of certain hormones, which causes that production to shut down temporarily. Zoladex implants are used to treat symptoms of prostate cancer in men. Zoladex implant is used in women to treat breast cancer or endometriosis. Zoladex is also used in women to prepare the lining of the uterus for endometrial ablation (a surgery to correct abnormal uterine bleeding).

Molar mass: 1,269.41 g/mol

CAS ID: 65807-02-5

Boiling point: 1,696 °C

ChEMBL Id: 1201247

ChemSpider ID: 4470656

Other names: D-Ser (But)6Azgly10-GnRH

Protein binding: 27.3

Brand

Zoladex is the trade name for goserelin. In some cases, health care professionals may use the trade name zoladex when referring to the generic drug name goserelin. Drug type: Goserelin is a hormone therapy. It is classified as an "LHRH agonist.

What are the possible side effects of Zoladex?

Zoladex may cause serious side effects including:

  1. difficulty breathing,
  2. swelling of your face,
  3. lips, tongue, or throat,
  4. painful or difficult urination,
  5. pain, bruising, swelling, redness, oozing, or bleeding where the implant was injected, increased urination, hunger, dry mouth,
  6. drowsiness, dry skin, blurred vision, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, constipation, muscle pain, weakness, bone pain, confusion, tiredness, restlessness,
  7. chest pain or pressure, sweating, back pain, muscle weakness,
  8. problems with balance or coor.

Summary

Goserelin is a synthetic analog of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone used to treat breast cancer and prostate cancer by reducing secretion of gonadotropins from the pituitary

Background

Goserelin is a synthetic hormone. In men, it stops the production of the hormone testosterone, which may stimulate the growth of cancer cells. In women, goserelin decreases the production of the hormone estradiol (which may stimulate the growth of cancer cells) to levels similar to a postmenopausal state. When the medication is stopped, hormone levels return to normal.

       
            1.png
       
 

CONCLUSION

The market for polymeric implantable drug delivery devices is one that is growing. The advantages that this delivery route demonstrate over more conventional drug delivery methods, such as oral tablets, make it likely that it will continue to grow and that the number of implantable drug delivery devices on the market will increase. However, implantable drug delivery devices have a number of disadvantages including the invasive nature of this delivery method. The advantages that these devices can offer with respect to patient compliance, stability of drugs within these devices and removability if adverse reactions occur, outweigh these disadvantages that exist. Current therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery devices are covered in this article.

REFERENCE

  1. Kleiner, L.W., Wright, J.C., Wang, Y., 2014. Evolution of implantable and insertable drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 181, 1_10.
  2. Kumar, A. and Pillai, J., 2018. Implantable drug delivery systems: An overview. In Nanostructures for the Engineering of Cells, Tissues and Organs (pp. 473-511). William Andrew Publishing.
  3. Mart?n del Valle, E.M., Galan, M.A. and Carbonell, R.G., 2009. Drug delivery technologies: the way forward in the new decade. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 48(5), pp.2475-2486.
  4. Psychoyos A (1986) Uterine receptivity for nidation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 476:36-42. 5 - Danckwerts M, Fassihi A. Implantable controlled release drug delivery systems: A Review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1991;17:1465-502.)
  5. Danckwerts M, Fassihi A (1991) Implantable controlled release drug delivery systems: a Review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 17:1465–1502.
  6. Ferguson TH, Needham GF, Wagner JF (1988) Compudose: animplant system for growth promotion and feed efficiency in cattle. J Contr Rel 8:45–54.
  7. Farcinio H (1996) Product or package? novel drug delivery systems blur the line. Pharm Tech Jan:26–34.
  8. Krege JH, Hodgin JB, Couse JF, Enmark E, Warner M, Mahler JF, Sar M, Korach KS, Gustafsson JÅ, Smithies O (1998) Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor ?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:15677-15682.
  9. Greening DW, Nguyen HP, Evans J, Simpson RJ, Salamonsen LA (2016) Modulating the endometrial epithelial proteome and secretome in preparation for pregnancy: The role of ovarian steroid and pregnancy hormones. J Proteomics 144:99-112.
  10. Naeslund G, Lundkvist O, Nilsson BO (1980) Transmission electron microscopy of mouse blastocysts activated and growth-arrested in vivo and in vitro. Anat Embryol 159: 33-48.
  11. Bischof P, Campana A (1997) Trophoblast differentiation and invasion: its significance for human embryo implantation. Early Pregnancy 3:81-95.
  12. Aj, M.Z., Patil, S.K., Baviskar, D.T. and Jain, D.K., 2012. Implantable drug delivery system: a review. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res, 4, pp.280-292..
  13. Stewart, S.A., Domínguez-Robles, J., Donnelly, R.F. and Larrañeta, E., 2018. Implantable polymeric drug delivery devices: classification, manufacture, materials, and clinical applications. Polymers, 10(12), p.1379.
  14. Dash, A.; Cudworth, G. Therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery systems. J.Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1998, 40, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  15. Dash, A.; Cudworth, G. Therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery systems. J.Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1998, 40, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, A.; Pillai, J. Implantable drug delivery systems. In Nanostructures for the Engineering of Cells, Tissues and Organs; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 473–511.
  17. Rademacher, K.H.; Vahdat, H.L.; Dorflinger, L.; Owen, D.H.; Steiner, M.J. Global Introduction of a LowCost Contraceptive Implant. In Critical Issues in Reproductive Health; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 285–306.
  18. Mansour, D.; Inki, P.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: A review of the literature. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2010, 15, S19–S31. [CrossRef]
  19. Affandi, B.; Santoso, S.S.I.; Hadisaputra, W.; Moeloek, F.A.; Prihartono, J.; Lubis, F.; Samil, R.S. Fiveyear experience with Norplant®. Contraception 1987, 36, 417–428. [CrossRef]
  20. Brache, V. WHO Symposium WHO. Background and study methodology of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of two implantable contraceptives for women: Jadelle and Implanon. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2014, 19, 1

Reference

  1. Kleiner, L.W., Wright, J.C., Wang, Y., 2014. Evolution of implantable and insertable drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 181, 1_10.
  2. Kumar, A. and Pillai, J., 2018. Implantable drug delivery systems: An overview. In Nanostructures for the Engineering of Cells, Tissues and Organs (pp. 473-511). William Andrew Publishing.
  3. Mart?n del Valle, E.M., Galan, M.A. and Carbonell, R.G., 2009. Drug delivery technologies: the way forward in the new decade. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 48(5), pp.2475-2486.
  4. Psychoyos A (1986) Uterine receptivity for nidation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 476:36-42. 5 - Danckwerts M, Fassihi A. Implantable controlled release drug delivery systems: A Review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1991;17:1465-502.)
  5. Danckwerts M, Fassihi A (1991) Implantable controlled release drug delivery systems: a Review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 17:1465–1502.
  6. Ferguson TH, Needham GF, Wagner JF (1988) Compudose: animplant system for growth promotion and feed efficiency in cattle. J Contr Rel 8:45–54.
  7. Farcinio H (1996) Product or package? novel drug delivery systems blur the line. Pharm Tech Jan:26–34.
  8. Krege JH, Hodgin JB, Couse JF, Enmark E, Warner M, Mahler JF, Sar M, Korach KS, Gustafsson JÅ, Smithies O (1998) Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor ?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:15677-15682.
  9. Greening DW, Nguyen HP, Evans J, Simpson RJ, Salamonsen LA (2016) Modulating the endometrial epithelial proteome and secretome in preparation for pregnancy: The role of ovarian steroid and pregnancy hormones. J Proteomics 144:99-112.
  10. Naeslund G, Lundkvist O, Nilsson BO (1980) Transmission electron microscopy of mouse blastocysts activated and growth-arrested in vivo and in vitro. Anat Embryol 159: 33-48.
  11. Bischof P, Campana A (1997) Trophoblast differentiation and invasion: its significance for human embryo implantation. Early Pregnancy 3:81-95.
  12. Aj, M.Z., Patil, S.K., Baviskar, D.T. and Jain, D.K., 2012. Implantable drug delivery system: a review. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res, 4, pp.280-292..
  13. Stewart, S.A., Domínguez-Robles, J., Donnelly, R.F. and Larrañeta, E., 2018. Implantable polymeric drug delivery devices: classification, manufacture, materials, and clinical applications. Polymers, 10(12), p.1379.
  14. Dash, A.; Cudworth, G. Therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery systems. J.Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1998, 40, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  15. Dash, A.; Cudworth, G. Therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery systems. J.Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1998, 40, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, A.; Pillai, J. Implantable drug delivery systems. In Nanostructures for the Engineering of Cells, Tissues and Organs; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 473–511.
  17. Rademacher, K.H.; Vahdat, H.L.; Dorflinger, L.; Owen, D.H.; Steiner, M.J. Global Introduction of a LowCost Contraceptive Implant. In Critical Issues in Reproductive Health; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 285–306.
  18. Mansour, D.; Inki, P.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: A review of the literature. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2010, 15, S19–S31. [CrossRef]
  19. Affandi, B.; Santoso, S.S.I.; Hadisaputra, W.; Moeloek, F.A.; Prihartono, J.; Lubis, F.; Samil, R.S. Fiveyear experience with Norplant®. Contraception 1987, 36, 417–428. [CrossRef]
  20. Brache, V. WHO Symposium WHO. Background and study methodology of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of two implantable contraceptives for women: Jadelle and Implanon. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2014, 19, 1

Photo
Yogita Pawar
Corresponding author

Late Bhagirathi Yashwantrao pathrikar college of pharmacy.

Photo
Shubhangi deore
Co-author

Late Bhagirathi Yashwantrao pathrikar college of pharmacy.

Photo
Priti Kolte
Co-author

Late Bhagirathi Yashwantrao pathrikar college of pharmacy.

Photo
Nitin kale
Co-author

Late Bhagirathi Yashwantrao pathrikar college of pharmacy.

Yogita Pawar*, Shubhangi doer, Priti Kolte, Nitin kale, Implantable Drug Delivery System, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 8, 3684-3688. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13369182

More related articles
Clinical Trial Design In Drug Enhance Safety And E...
Sourabh Patil, Shreyash Koli, Suvarna Deshmukh, Tejas Kapase , Sa...
Hepatoprotective Abilities of Flavonoids and the D...
Abdul Hameed, Dr. Divya Sing, Hina Afaq, Yash Srivastav, ...
A Systematic Guide on HPLC Troubleshooting...
Snehal Ugale, Vinayak Gaware, Rahul Khaire, Charushila Bhangale, ...
Development And Evaluation Of Sustained Release Venlafaxine Hydrochloride Tablet...
Prasanna Babu Racheeti, A.LAKSHMAN RAO, L.BHUSHAN KUMAR, B.YELLAMANDA, Y.RAMYA, ...
Formulation And Characterization Of Provesicular Based Drug Delivery System For ...
Akshata Rajesh Shirodker, Rajashree Gude, Suman Harisingh Vishwakarma, Eliska Wendy de Souza, Vishak...
Related Articles
Nanoemulsion: An Emerging Approach For The Enhancement Of Solubility In Lipophil...
E. P. Punnya, Ranitha R., Megha P. M., Sreethu K. Sreedharan, ...
Clinical Trial Design In Drug Enhance Safety And Efficacy...
Sourabh Patil, Shreyash Koli, Suvarna Deshmukh, Tejas Kapase , Sachin Navale, Nilesh Chougule, ...
More related articles
Clinical Trial Design In Drug Enhance Safety And Efficacy...
Sourabh Patil, Shreyash Koli, Suvarna Deshmukh, Tejas Kapase , Sachin Navale, Nilesh Chougule, ...
Hepatoprotective Abilities of Flavonoids and the Development and Detection of He...
Abdul Hameed, Dr. Divya Sing, Hina Afaq, Yash Srivastav, ...
A Systematic Guide on HPLC Troubleshooting...
Snehal Ugale, Vinayak Gaware, Rahul Khaire, Charushila Bhangale, ...
Clinical Trial Design In Drug Enhance Safety And Efficacy...
Sourabh Patil, Shreyash Koli, Suvarna Deshmukh, Tejas Kapase , Sachin Navale, Nilesh Chougule, ...
Hepatoprotective Abilities of Flavonoids and the Development and Detection of He...
Abdul Hameed, Dr. Divya Sing, Hina Afaq, Yash Srivastav, ...
A Systematic Guide on HPLC Troubleshooting...
Snehal Ugale, Vinayak Gaware, Rahul Khaire, Charushila Bhangale, ...