Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Hydrogels—three-dimensional, water-rich polymer networks—have become pivotal in drug delivery research owing to their biocompatibility, tunable properties, and capacity for controlled release. Early hydrogel systems provided steady, sustained drug release but offered limited targeting and responsiveness. Recent advances in polymer science, nanotechnology, and fabrication methods have resulted in “smart” hydrogels with environmental triggers, improved mechanical stability, and site-specific targeting. This review outlines the evolution of hydrogels from traditional sustained-release platforms to advanced, stimuli-responsive formulations. Key topics include fundamental hydrogel chemistry, drug-loading methods, classifications by source and responsiveness, and mechanisms of drug release. The discussion then moves to exemplary applications, including cancer therapy, wound healing, ocular treatments, and neurological disorders. Safety, toxicity, and regulatory perspectives are also addressed, along with current challenges—such as manufacturing scale-up—and future directions in personalized medicine and integrated bioelectronic systems. Collectively, this review underscores the growing significance of hydrogel-based drug delivery for improving treatment efficacy and patient quality of life.
Background and Significance of Drug Delivery Systems
The efficacy of therapeutic agents often hinges on the method by which they are delivered. Traditional routes, including oral tablets and intravenous injections, can suffer from poor bioavailability, systemic side effects, and low patient adherence [1]. These drawbacks led to the emergence of controlled-release strategies designed to enhance drug efficacy and minimize unwanted toxicity. Early controlled-release systems focused on maintaining stable plasma drug concentrations over extended periods, but lacked the versatility to address diverse physiological barriers and patient-specific needs. Hydrogels have since become major players in this arena. Their high-water content and porous, networked structures allow for significant drug loading alongside tunable release profiles [2]. Research efforts over the past few decades have broadened the scope of hydrogel applications, encompassing stimuli-triggered drug release, tissue engineering scaffolds, and multifunctional therapeutic platforms.
Definition and Basic Concepts of Hydrogels
Hydrogels are crosslinked polymeric networks that retain large amounts of water without dissolving. These networks can be formed via physical or chemical crosslinking, resulting in materials that exhibit elasticity, permeability to small molecules, and compatibility with biological tissues. Natural hydrogels (e.g., alginate, chitosan) tend to be highly biocompatible but can face reproducibility and mechanical stability issues. Conversely, synthetic hydrogels (e.g., polyethylene glycol), polyacrylate) offer greater control over structure and performance but may require additional steps to ensure safety and biological acceptance[3].
Scope of the Review
This review encompasses both foundational knowledge and advanced concepts in hydrogel-based drug delivery. It traces the history of hydrogel formulations from their early inception to contemporary innovations. It helps to explores the core chemistry, swelling behavior, and degradation profiles essential for rational hydrogel design. It got categorizes hydrogels by source, crosslinking type, and stimuli-responsiveness, while it helps to elucidates key drug release mechanisms. It addresses the traditional hydrogel systems, and it gives highlights of cutting-edge technologies like smart and nano-engineered hydrogels. It helps to examines applications in oncology, wound healing, ocular delivery, and more. Finally, the article discuss safety, regulatory considerations, challenges, and future perspectives. The review concludes that with a summary of current trends and anticipated directions for hydrogel-based therapeutics.
Evolution Of Hydrogel-Based Formulations
Early Development
The concept of hydrogels gained momentum in the 1960s, particularly through the work of Wichterle and Lim on soft contact lenses. Their pioneering contributions showcased the advantages of polymer networks capable of absorbing water while maintaining dimensional stability. These early hydrogels saw quick adoption in ophthalmic products and wound dressings, primarily due to their ability to keep surfaces hydrated[4].
Progress in Drug Delivery
While the initial focus was on biomedical devices, the potential of hydrogels as drug carriers soon became evident. First-generation hydrogel-based drug delivery systems enabled sustained release over extended durations but offered limited adaptability to patient-specific conditions or targeting. Nevertheless, these early successes laid a foundation for the more sophisticated applications that would follow[5].
Evolution into Modern Platforms
As polymer chemistry evolved, so did hydrogel formulations. Breakthroughs in chemical crosslinking, polymer blending, and nanotechnology paved the way for new functionalities and release profiles. The introduction of stimuli-responsive features—such as pH and temperature sensitivity—allowed for on-demand drug release in specific biological environments. The evolution of hydrogels is summarized in Figure 1. This evolution signaled the transition from relatively simple, passively releasing hydrogels to complex, interactive systems integral to personalized medicine strategies[6].
<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-5.png" target="_blank">
<img alt="Evolution of Hydrogel Based Formulations.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-5.png" width="150">
</a>
Fig – 1: Evolution of Hydrogel Based Formulations
Fundamentals Of Hydrogel Chemistry and Structure
Network Formation
Hydrogels arise from polymer chains that are crosslinked either physically (hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, or hydrophobic forces) or chemically (covalent bonds formed via polymerization or functional group reactions)[7]. Physical crosslinking often yields reversible gels responsive to environmental shifts, while chemical crosslinking produces more stable networks. Choice of polymer (natural, synthetic, or hybrid) influences mechanical strength, degradability, and biocompatibility.
Swelling Behavior
A hydrogel’s swelling capacity underpins its drug-release characteristics and mechanical properties[8]. Swelling is modulated by polymer composition, crosslink density, and external factors like pH or ionic strength as shown in Figure 2.[9]. Higher crosslink density typically reduces the degree of swelling, restricting diffusion pathways for larger molecules. In contrast, loosely crosslinked networks enable higher swelling but can compromise mechanical stability.
<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-4.png" target="_blank"><img alt="Swelling Behavior of Hydrogels.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-4.png" width="150">
</a>
Fig – 2: Swelling Behavior of Hydrogels
Mechanical and Rheological Properties
Mechanical demands differ among applications—e.g., injectable hydrogels need lower viscosity and quick gelation, while tissue engineering scaffolds may require higher stiffness.By adjusting the crosslink density, polymer chain length, and blending techniques,flexibility and strength can be balanced.Rheological studies give light on flow characteristics, elasticity, and gelation kinetics—all of which are crucial for clinical usability and product development[10].
Degradation and Biocompatibility
Many hydrogel systems are designed to degrade in vivo to avoid post-treatment removal. Degradation can occur via hydrolysis or enzymatic pathways, yielding soluble byproducts ideally excreted without toxicity. Biocompatibility hinges on ensuring the absence of harmful residues, minimal immune response, and proper mechanical integration within tissues [11].
Drug Loading Methods
The drug incorporation approach—physical entrapment, covalent conjugation, or post-gelation loading—impacts release profiles and therapeutic efficacy [12]. Physical entrapment mixes drug and polymer prior to gelation, risking initial burst release if not managed carefully. Covalent linkage can reduce burst effects, but demands compatible reactive groups. Post-loading infiltration allows controlled diffusion into formed gels, useful for temperature- or pH-sensitive therapeutics[13]. A comparative representation of drug loading methods for optimal release is given in Figure 3.
<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-3.png" target="_blank">
<img alt="Comparison of Drug Loading Methods for Optimal Release Profiles.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-3.png" width="150">
</a>
Fig – 3: Comparison of Drug Loading Methods for Optimal Release Profiles
Classification Of Hydrogels for Drug Delivery
By Source
By Network Formation
By Stimuli Responsiveness
By Crosslinking Density and Swelling
Microgels (micrometer scale) and macrogels (larger 3D structures) differ in crosslink density and mesh size, influencing drug diffusion and mechanical stability. Loosely crosslinked networks swell more but can be prone to rapid drug release; tighter networks constrain swelling but may hinder larger drug molecules[17]. The classification of hydrogels is given in figure 4 and the key criteria for the classification of hydrogels is given in Table 1.
<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-2.png" target="_blank">
<img alt="Classification of Polymers in Bio-Medical Applications.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-2.png" width="150">
</a>
Fig – 4: Classification of Polymers in Bio-Medical Applications
Table 1: Key Classification Criteria for Hydrogels
Criterion |
Categories |
Key Attributes |
Source |
Natural, Synthetic, Hybrid |
Biocompatibility, reproducibility, mechanical strength |
Network Formation |
Physical vs. Chemical Crosslinking |
Reversible vs. permanent structures |
Stimuli Responsiveness |
pH, Thermal, Light, Enzyme/Multi-Stimuli |
Targeted/on-demand release |
Crosslinking Density/Swelling |
Microgels vs. Macrogels |
Drug diffusion, mechanical robustness |
Mechanisms Of Drug Release from Hydrogels
Diffusion-Controlled Release
Drug diffusion in hydrogels is often guided by Fick’s law, especially when the network remains intact. The polymer matrix serves as a rate-limiting barrier, with mesh size and polymer–drug interactions influencing the release rate. Non-Fickian or anomalous diffusion arises when swelling or polymer relaxation significantly contributes to the release kinetics[18].
Swelling-Controlled Release
In swelling-controlled systems, the hydrogel’s expansion in aqueous media regulates drug liberation. As water permeates the network, it increases mesh size, facilitating drug egress. Mathematical models like the Peppas–Sahlin equation describe situations where both diffusion and network relaxation are important[19].
Chemically Controlled Release
Some hydrogels gradually erode through hydrolysis or enzymatic cleavage, releasing the embedded drug. Prodrugs can also be covalently tethered to the polymer backbone for targeted release upon bond cleavage. This approach is particularly useful when precise control over temporal or site-specific dosing is essential.
Stimuli-Induced Release
“Smart” hydrogels can alter their swelling or degrade upon exposure to triggers like pH, temperature, light, or magnetic fields. This property enables on-demand release in response to changes in the local environment (e.g., acidic tumor milieu) or external signals (e.g., LED illumination in dermatology). These hydrogels are designed to react to specific stimuli, such as changes in pH, temperature, light exposure, or magnetic fields[20]. Stimuli-responsive mechanisms enhance therapeutic specificity and minimize off-target effects.
<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-1.png" target="_blank">
<img alt="Mechanism of Drug Release from Hydrogels.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-1.png" width="150">
</a>
Fig – 5: Mechanism of Drug Release from Hydrogels
Traditional Hydrogel Formulations: Sustained And Controlled Release
Conventional Systems and Their Drawbacks
Early hydrogel-based technologies improved upon conventional dosage forms by offering extended drug release. Examples include:
Although successful, these systems largely lacked dynamic responsiveness. The release profile was often governed by passive diffusion and limited by the inability to target specific tissues or quickly adapt to physiological changes.
Case Studies
Barriers to Widespread Adoption
Manufacturing scale-up remains nontrivial. Ensuring consistency in polymer composition and crosslinking across large batches can be challenging. Moreover, certain hydrogels degrade or lose functionality with prolonged storage, complicating commercialization and regulatory approval.
Advanced Hydrogel-Based Drug Delivery Systems
Smart and Responsive Hydrogels
pH-Responsive Hydrogels exploit the acidic microenvironment of tumors or the varying pH in the GI tract, releasing drugs specifically at thes e sites.
Temperature-Responsive Hydrogels—often leveraging PNIPAAm—undergo solution-to-gel transitions around body temperature, facilitating injectable in situ gelling.
Multi-Stimuli Responsive Designs combine multiple triggers, further refining control over drug release timing and location. Figure 6 demonstrates different types of smart hydrogels and table 2 summarizes the examples of stimuli responsive hydrogels.
<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-0.png" target="_blank">
<img alt="Types of Smart Hydrogels.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-0.png" width="150">
</a>
Fig – 6: Types of Smart Hydrogels
Nano-Engineered Hydrogels (Nanogels)
Nanogels, sub-1000 nm hydrogel particles, can leverage the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumors, improving drug accumulation in diseased tissue. Fabrication techniques include emulsion polymerization and ionic gelation. Nanogels often exhibit better circulation times and targeted drug delivery capacity[22].
Targeted Drug Delivery
By linking targeting ligands (e.g., antibodies or peptides) onto the hydrogel surface, site-specific interactions with receptor-bearing cells can be achieved. This active targeting approach can significantly elevate drug concentration at the desired site while minimizing systemic exposure.
Injectable and In Situ Forming Hydrogels
Injectable hydrogels simplify the administration process: a solution precursor is injected, transitioning into a gel upon experiencing physiological conditions. This approach is particularly attractive in tissue engineering, allowing hydrogel scaffolds to mold to irregular cavities and deliver growth factors or cells locally[23].
Co-Delivery of Multiple Agents
Advanced hydrogel systems support the simultaneous release of small molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids. This co-delivery strategy can be critical in diseases like cancer, where combination regimens show improved therapeutic outcomes and reduced resistance. Designing hydrogel compartments that segregate different drugs can manage drug–drug interactions.
3D-Printed Hydrogel Systems
3D printing enables customized hydrogel constructs with precise architecture and drug-loading patterns. This customization is highly relevant for patient-specific implants or scaffolds in regenerative medicine[24]. The technique allows layer-by-layer deposition, which helps control local drug concentrations and release kinetics. Some examples of selected advanced hydrogel formulations are given in table 3.
Table 2: Examples of Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels
Stimulus |
Polymer/System |
Mechanism |
Application |
pH |
Chitosan–gelatin blend |
Protonation/deprotonation in acidic environments |
Tumor or colonic release |
Temperature |
PNIPAAm-based hydrogels |
LCST-based phase transition |
Injectable in situ gels |
Enzyme |
Peptide-crosslinked networks |
Enzymatic bond cleavage |
Tumor-specific targeting |
Light |
Azobenzene-modified polymers |
Photoisomerization inducing network changes |
Ocular or dermatological admin |
Table 3: Selected Advanced Hydrogel Formulations
Formulation |
Key Feature |
Example Reference |
Nanogel for Tumor Therapy |
Enhanced EPR-based accumulation |
Park et al., 2021 |
Thermoresponsive In Situ Gel |
Sol–gel transition at body temperature |
Roy & Gupta, 2020 |
Magnetic Hydrogel Implant |
External field-guided localization |
Tran & Balkus, 2020 |
Multi-Drug Loaded Matrix |
Sequential release of synergistic therapies |
Leach et al., 2021 |
Specific Therapeutic Applications
Cancer Therapy
Conventional chemotherapy is often associated with systemic toxicity and low tumor specificity[25]. Hydrogels help localize chemotherapeutic agents at tumor sites, exploiting unique tumoral conditions like pH or enzyme overexpression for triggered release. Injectable formulations can be placed directly into or near the tumor to form a depot, maintaining high local drug concentrations.
Combination Treatments
In cancer, combination therapies—e.g., chemotherapy and immunotherapy—can be delivered via hydrogels to achieve synergistic effects[26]. Co-encapsulation of drugs with different mechanisms can enhance overall efficacy while reducing exposure-related side effects.
Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration
Hydrogel-based wound dressings keep the wound environment moist, promoting cell migration and nutrient exchange [27]. Incorporation of antimicrobial agents reduces infection risk, while encapsulated growth factors stimulate tissue repair [28]. In tissue engineering, biodegradable hydrogel scaffolds seeded with cells can regenerate damaged tissues with minimal surgical intervention [29].
Ophthalmic Delivery
Ocular drug delivery is complicated by tear turnover and limited corneal permeability [30]. Hydrogels in contact lenses enable extended-release therapies, improving efficacy over conventional eye drops. For posterior eye diseases (e.g., macular degeneration), injectable hydrogels can be placed in the vitreous cavity to deliver drugs over weeks or months.
Oral Drug Delivery
Oral hydrogels can protect acid-labile drugs in the stomach and release them in specific intestinal regions. Mucoadhesive properties extend gastric residence time, enhancing drug absorption. pH-responsive formulations can further refine release, targeting the colon or other GI segments[31].
Transdermal and Topical Applications
Hydrogel patches are favored for transdermal delivery of analgesics, hormones, or nicotine, thanks to their comfortable adhesion and high water content. The hydrated matrix improves skin permeability while reducing irritation.
Neurological Disorders
Surmounting the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a major obstacle in CNS drug delivery. Injectable hydrogels can be administered intracranially for localized release of therapeutics aimed at treating conditions like glioblastoma or Parkinson’s disease [32]. Certain enzyme-responsive hydrogels can degrade selectively in neural regions, tailoring drug delivery to pathological sites [33]. Therapeutic applications of hydrogels are summarized in table 4.
Table 4: Therapeutic Applications of Hydrogel-Based Delivery
Application |
Advantages |
Notable Example |
Cancer Therapy |
Localized and/or triggered release |
Injectable chemo-immuno hydrogel |
Wound Healing |
Moist environment, can include drugs |
Antimicrobial hydrogel dressings |
Ophthalmic Delivery |
Extended ocular residence time |
Contact lenses with drug elution |
Oral Delivery |
Protection from GI conditions |
pH-responsive hydrogel capsules |
Neurological Disorders |
Bypass BBB, targeted release |
Intracranial hydrogel implants |
Safety, Toxicology, And Regulatory Considerations
Biocompatibility and Toxicity
Although often viewed as biocompatible, hydrogels require careful validation. Unreacted monomers or crosslinkers may cause inflammation. Degradation byproducts, if toxic, can incite immune responses[34]. Preclinical tests generally include in vitro cytotoxicity assays, hemocompatibility studies, and in vivo safety assessments.
Regulatory Pathways
Regulatory frameworks classify hydrogel-based systems as medical devices, drug-device combinations, or biologics, depending on their composition and intended use. Maintaining consistent polymer quality, reproducible crosslinking, and stable product performance is essential for meeting standards set by agencies like the FDA or EMA. Advanced hydrogels incorporating nanoscale or genetically active components face additional scrutiny [35].
Manufacturing Challenges
Scaling up hydrogel production involves controlling reaction parameters, ensuring batch uniformity, and managing sterilization. Some hydrogels degrade under certain sterilization methods (e.g., autoclaving), necessitating alternative approaches[36].Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines require robust documentation and quality assurance at every stage.
Challenges And Future Perspectives
Remaining Limitations
Hydrogel performance can be hindered by modest mechanical strength, which can be insufficient for load-bearing or long-term implantation [37]. Complex formulations that incorporate multiple triggers or therapeutics raise manufacturing and stability concerns[38]. Immune reactions, albeit less common with well-characterized polymers, can still occur under certain conditions[39].
Emerging Directions
Synergy with Other Technologies
Microfluidic platforms can create well-defined hydrogel microparticles, optimizing size, shape, and drug loading [40]. Wearable sensors and wireless devices may couple with hydrogel patches for controlled dosing based on biometric feedback. Interdisciplinary cooperation is crucial to translate these advanced concepts into clinical solutions.
Clinical Translation and Market Outlook
Growing interest from pharmaceutical companies underscores the commercial potential of hydrogel-based systems. Established uses in contact lenses and wound dressings foreshadow the feasibility of more complex platforms. Ultimately, the successful adoption of advanced hydrogels will depend on cost-effectiveness, clinical validation, and regulatory pathways.
CONCLUSION
Hydrogels have come a long way from their origins in contact lenses and basic sustained-release formulations. Ongoing innovations in polymer science, nanotechnology, and fabrication methods have enabled advanced hydrogel systems that respond to stimuli, release multiple therapeutic agents, and integrate seamlessly with biological tissues. These materials are now central to a range of applications, including targeted cancer therapy, wound healing, ophthalmology, and neurological treatments. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in manufacturing, regulatory approval, and ensuring consistent performance across variable physiological conditions. Continued interdisciplinary research—bridging materials science, clinical medicine, and engineering—will be vital for resolving these limitations. As the field advances, hydrogel-based drug delivery systems are poised to become even more sophisticated, paving the way for personalized medicine and integrative therapeutic strategies that promise higher efficacy, lower toxicity, and improved patient experiences.
REFERENCES
Suripeddi Muralidhar*, Ramya K., Gunda Rajeev Sri Sasikar, Gummadi Suvarna Ratnam, Gundabathula Poornima, Jalluri Ramya, Jampana Sai Ananth Varma, Hydrogel-Based Drug Delivery: From Traditional Formulations to Advanced Applications, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 4, 3409-3423 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15309586