View Article

Abstract

Hydrogels—three-dimensional, water-rich polymer networks—have become pivotal in drug delivery research owing to their biocompatibility, tunable properties, and capacity for controlled release. Early hydrogel systems provided steady, sustained drug release but offered limited targeting and responsiveness. Recent advances in polymer science, nanotechnology, and fabrication methods have resulted in “smart” hydrogels with environmental triggers, improved mechanical stability, and site-specific targeting. This review outlines the evolution of hydrogels from traditional sustained-release platforms to advanced, stimuli-responsive formulations. Key topics include fundamental hydrogel chemistry, drug-loading methods, classifications by source and responsiveness, and mechanisms of drug release. The discussion then moves to exemplary applications, including cancer therapy, wound healing, ocular treatments, and neurological disorders. Safety, toxicity, and regulatory perspectives are also addressed, along with current challenges—such as manufacturing scale-up—and future directions in personalized medicine and integrated bioelectronic systems. Collectively, this review underscores the growing significance of hydrogel-based drug delivery for improving treatment efficacy and patient quality of life.

Keywords

Hydrogels, Drug delivery, Controlled release, Stimuli-responsive, Nanotechnology, Biocompatibility.

Introduction

Background and Significance of Drug Delivery Systems

The efficacy of therapeutic agents often hinges on the method by which they are delivered. Traditional routes, including oral tablets and intravenous injections, can suffer from poor bioavailability, systemic side effects, and low patient adherence [1]. These drawbacks led to the emergence of controlled-release strategies designed to enhance drug efficacy and minimize unwanted toxicity. Early controlled-release systems focused on maintaining stable plasma drug concentrations over extended periods, but lacked the versatility to address diverse physiological barriers and patient-specific needs. Hydrogels have since become major players in this arena. Their high-water content and porous, networked structures allow for significant drug loading alongside tunable release profiles [2]. Research efforts over the past few decades have broadened the scope of hydrogel applications, encompassing stimuli-triggered drug release, tissue engineering scaffolds, and multifunctional therapeutic platforms.

Definition and Basic Concepts of Hydrogels

Hydrogels are crosslinked polymeric networks that retain large amounts of water without dissolving. These networks can be formed via physical or chemical crosslinking, resulting in materials that exhibit elasticity, permeability to small molecules, and compatibility with biological tissues. Natural hydrogels (e.g., alginate, chitosan) tend to be highly biocompatible but can face reproducibility and mechanical stability issues. Conversely, synthetic hydrogels (e.g., polyethylene glycol), polyacrylate) offer greater control over structure and performance but may require additional steps to ensure safety and biological acceptance[3].

Scope of the Review

This review encompasses both foundational knowledge and advanced concepts in hydrogel-based drug delivery. It traces the history of hydrogel formulations from their early inception to contemporary innovations. It helps to explores the core chemistry, swelling behavior, and degradation profiles essential for rational hydrogel design. It got categorizes hydrogels by source, crosslinking type, and stimuli-responsiveness, while it helps to elucidates key drug release mechanisms. It addresses the traditional hydrogel systems, and it gives highlights of cutting-edge technologies like smart and nano-engineered hydrogels. It helps to examines applications in oncology, wound healing, ocular delivery, and more. Finally, the article discuss safety, regulatory considerations, challenges, and future perspectives. The review concludes that with a summary of current trends and anticipated directions for hydrogel-based therapeutics.

Evolution Of Hydrogel-Based Formulations

Early Development

The concept of hydrogels gained momentum in the 1960s, particularly through the work of Wichterle and Lim on soft contact lenses. Their pioneering contributions showcased the advantages of polymer networks capable of absorbing water while maintaining dimensional stability. These early hydrogels saw quick adoption in ophthalmic products and wound dressings, primarily due to their ability to keep surfaces hydrated[4].

Progress in Drug Delivery

While the initial focus was on biomedical devices, the potential of hydrogels as drug carriers soon became evident. First-generation hydrogel-based drug delivery systems enabled sustained release over extended durations but offered limited adaptability to patient-specific conditions or targeting. Nevertheless, these early successes laid a foundation for the more sophisticated applications that would follow[5].

Evolution into Modern Platforms

As polymer chemistry evolved, so did hydrogel formulations. Breakthroughs in chemical crosslinking, polymer blending, and nanotechnology paved the way for new functionalities and release profiles. The introduction of stimuli-responsive features—such as pH and temperature sensitivity—allowed for on-demand drug release in specific biological environments. The evolution of hydrogels is summarized in Figure 1. This evolution signaled the transition from relatively simple, passively releasing hydrogels to complex, interactive systems integral to personalized medicine strategies[6].

        <a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-5.png" target="_blank">
            <img alt="Evolution of Hydrogel Based Formulations.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-5.png" width="150">
        </a>
Fig – 1: Evolution of Hydrogel Based Formulations

Fundamentals Of Hydrogel Chemistry and Structure

Network Formation

Hydrogels arise from polymer chains that are crosslinked either physically (hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, or hydrophobic forces) or chemically (covalent bonds formed via polymerization or functional group reactions)[7]. Physical crosslinking often yields reversible gels responsive to environmental shifts, while chemical crosslinking produces more stable networks. Choice of polymer (natural, synthetic, or hybrid) influences mechanical strength, degradability, and biocompatibility.

Swelling Behavior

A hydrogel’s swelling capacity underpins its drug-release characteristics and mechanical properties[8]. Swelling is modulated by polymer composition, crosslink density, and external factors like pH or ionic strength as shown in Figure 2.[9]. Higher crosslink density typically reduces the degree of swelling, restricting diffusion pathways for larger molecules. In contrast, loosely crosslinked networks enable higher swelling but can compromise mechanical stability.

        <a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-4.png" target="_blank"><img alt="Swelling Behavior of Hydrogels.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-4.png" width="150">
        </a>
Fig – 2: Swelling Behavior of Hydrogels

Mechanical and Rheological Properties

Mechanical demands differ among applications—e.g., injectable hydrogels need lower viscosity and quick gelation, while tissue engineering scaffolds may require higher stiffness.By adjusting the crosslink density, polymer chain length, and blending techniques,flexibility and strength can be balanced.Rheological studies give light on flow characteristics, elasticity, and gelation kinetics—all of which are crucial for clinical usability and product development[10].

Degradation and Biocompatibility

Many hydrogel systems are designed to degrade in vivo to avoid post-treatment removal. Degradation can occur via hydrolysis or enzymatic pathways, yielding soluble byproducts ideally excreted without toxicity. Biocompatibility hinges on ensuring the absence of harmful residues, minimal immune response, and proper mechanical integration within tissues [11].

Drug Loading Methods

The drug incorporation approach—physical entrapment, covalent conjugation, or post-gelation loading—impacts release profiles and therapeutic efficacy [12]. Physical entrapment mixes drug and polymer prior to gelation, risking initial burst release if not managed carefully. Covalent linkage can reduce burst effects, but demands compatible reactive groups. Post-loading infiltration allows controlled diffusion into formed gels, useful for temperature- or pH-sensitive therapeutics[13]. A comparative representation of drug loading methods for optimal release is given in Figure 3.

        <a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-3.png" target="_blank">
            <img alt="Comparison of Drug Loading Methods for Optimal Release Profiles.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-3.png" width="150">
        </a>
Fig – 3: Comparison of Drug Loading Methods for Optimal Release Profiles

Classification Of Hydrogels for Drug Delivery

By Source

  • Natural Polymers: Examples include alginate, chitosan, and collagen, prized for inherent biocompatibility and biodegradability but subject to potential variability and weaker mechanics.
  • Synthetic Polymers: PEG, PVA, or poly(acrylic acid) allow greater customization of network architecture and mechanical features.
  • Hybrid Systems: Combine natural and synthetic elements, merging robust mechanical attributes with favorable biological interactions.

By Network Formation

  • Physical Crosslinking: Reversible bonds formed via electrostatic or hydrogen bonding.
  • Chemical Crosslinking: Covalent linkages that yield more durable scaffolds but may require additional purification to remove unreacted compounds[14].

By Stimuli Responsiveness

  • pH-Responsive: Ideal for GI or tumor applications where pH differs from systemic levels.
  • Thermo-Responsive: Gelation near physiological temperature, enabling in situ formation for minimally invasive administration [15].
  • Light-Responsive: Photo-triggered changes in network structure allow precise spatiotemporal control[16].
  • Enzyme or Multi-Stimuli: Achieve highly targeted release by responding to complex biochemical cues.

By Crosslinking Density and Swelling

Microgels (micrometer scale) and macrogels (larger 3D structures) differ in crosslink density and mesh size, influencing drug diffusion and mechanical stability. Loosely crosslinked networks swell more but can be prone to rapid drug release; tighter networks constrain swelling but may hinder larger drug molecules[17]. The classification of hydrogels is given in figure 4 and the key criteria for the classification of hydrogels is given in Table 1.

<a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-2.png" target="_blank">
            <img alt="Classification of Polymers in Bio-Medical Applications.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-2.png" width="150">
        </a>
Fig – 4: Classification of Polymers in Bio-Medical Applications

Table 1: Key Classification Criteria for Hydrogels

Criterion

Categories

Key Attributes

Source

Natural, Synthetic, Hybrid

Biocompatibility, reproducibility, mechanical strength

Network Formation

Physical vs. Chemical Crosslinking

Reversible vs. permanent structures

Stimuli Responsiveness

pH, Thermal, Light, Enzyme/Multi-Stimuli

Targeted/on-demand release

Crosslinking Density/Swelling

Microgels vs. Macrogels

Drug diffusion, mechanical robustness

Mechanisms Of Drug Release from Hydrogels

Diffusion-Controlled Release

Drug diffusion in hydrogels is often guided by Fick’s law, especially when the network remains intact. The polymer matrix serves as a rate-limiting barrier, with mesh size and polymer–drug interactions influencing the release rate. Non-Fickian or anomalous diffusion arises when swelling or polymer relaxation significantly contributes to the release kinetics[18].

Swelling-Controlled Release

In swelling-controlled systems, the hydrogel’s expansion in aqueous media regulates drug liberation. As water permeates the network, it increases mesh size, facilitating drug egress. Mathematical models like the Peppas–Sahlin equation describe situations where both diffusion and network relaxation are important[19].

Chemically Controlled Release

Some hydrogels gradually erode through hydrolysis or enzymatic cleavage, releasing the embedded drug. Prodrugs can also be covalently tethered to the polymer backbone for targeted release upon bond cleavage. This approach is particularly useful when precise control over temporal or site-specific dosing is essential.

Stimuli-Induced Release

“Smart” hydrogels can alter their swelling or degrade upon exposure to triggers like pH, temperature, light, or magnetic fields. This property enables on-demand release in response to changes in the local environment (e.g., acidic tumor milieu) or external signals (e.g., LED illumination in dermatology). These hydrogels are designed to react to specific stimuli, such as changes in pH, temperature, light exposure, or magnetic fields[20]. Stimuli-responsive mechanisms enhance therapeutic specificity and minimize off-target effects.

        <a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-1.png" target="_blank">
            <img alt="Mechanism of Drug Release from Hydrogels.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-1.png" width="150">
        </a>
Fig – 5: Mechanism of Drug Release from Hydrogels

Traditional Hydrogel Formulations: Sustained And Controlled Release

Conventional Systems and Their Drawbacks

Early hydrogel-based technologies improved upon conventional dosage forms by offering extended drug release. Examples include:

  • Oral Hydrogels: Designed to swell in the GI tract, resulting in slow, sustained delivery.
  • Transdermal Patches: Hydrogel matrices delivering analgesics or hormones with reduced skin irritation[21].

Although successful, these systems largely lacked dynamic responsiveness. The release profile was often governed by passive diffusion and limited by the inability to target specific tissues or quickly adapt to physiological changes.

Case Studies

  • Contact Lens Devices: Hydrogels for ocular drug delivery offered continuous dosing of anti-inflammatory or anti-glaucoma medications.
  • Wound Dressings: Hydrogel-based dressings maintained moisture and, in some formulations, released antimicrobials or growth factors for improved healing.

Barriers to Widespread Adoption

Manufacturing scale-up remains nontrivial. Ensuring consistency in polymer composition and crosslinking across large batches can be challenging. Moreover, certain hydrogels degrade or lose functionality with prolonged storage, complicating commercialization and regulatory approval.

Advanced Hydrogel-Based Drug Delivery Systems

Smart and Responsive Hydrogels

pH-Responsive Hydrogels exploit the acidic microenvironment of tumors or the varying pH in the GI tract, releasing drugs specifically at thes         e sites.
Temperature-Responsive Hydrogels—often leveraging PNIPAAm—undergo solution-to-gel transitions around body temperature, facilitating injectable in situ gelling.
Multi-Stimuli Responsive Designs combine multiple triggers, further refining control over drug release timing and location. Figure 6 demonstrates different types of smart hydrogels and table 2 summarizes the examples of stimuli responsive hydrogels.

        <a href="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-0.png" target="_blank">
            <img alt="Types of Smart Hydrogels.png" height="150" src="https://www.ijpsjournal.com/uploads/createUrl/createUrl-20250430163326-0.png" width="150">
        </a>
Fig – 6: Types of Smart Hydrogels

Nano-Engineered Hydrogels (Nanogels)

Nanogels, sub-1000 nm hydrogel particles, can leverage the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumors, improving drug accumulation in diseased tissue. Fabrication techniques include emulsion polymerization and ionic gelation. Nanogels often exhibit better circulation times and targeted drug delivery capacity[22].

Targeted Drug Delivery

By linking targeting ligands (e.g., antibodies or peptides) onto the hydrogel surface, site-specific interactions with receptor-bearing cells can be achieved. This active targeting approach can significantly elevate drug concentration at the desired site while minimizing systemic exposure.

Injectable and In Situ Forming Hydrogels

Injectable hydrogels simplify the administration process: a solution precursor is injected, transitioning into a gel upon experiencing physiological conditions. This approach is particularly attractive in tissue engineering, allowing hydrogel scaffolds to mold to irregular cavities and deliver growth factors or cells locally[23].

Co-Delivery of Multiple Agents

Advanced hydrogel systems support the simultaneous release of small molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids. This co-delivery strategy can be critical in diseases like cancer, where combination regimens show improved therapeutic outcomes and reduced resistance. Designing hydrogel compartments that segregate different drugs can manage drug–drug interactions.

3D-Printed Hydrogel Systems

3D printing enables customized hydrogel constructs with precise architecture and drug-loading patterns. This customization is highly relevant for patient-specific implants or scaffolds in regenerative medicine[24]. The technique allows layer-by-layer deposition, which helps control local drug concentrations and release kinetics. Some examples of selected advanced hydrogel formulations are given in table 3.

Table 2: Examples of Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels

Stimulus

Polymer/System

Mechanism

Application

pH

Chitosan–gelatin blend

Protonation/deprotonation in acidic environments

Tumor or colonic release

Temperature

PNIPAAm-based hydrogels

LCST-based phase transition

Injectable in situ gels

Enzyme

Peptide-crosslinked networks

Enzymatic bond cleavage

Tumor-specific targeting

Light

Azobenzene-modified polymers

Photoisomerization inducing network changes

Ocular or dermatological admin

Table 3: Selected Advanced Hydrogel Formulations

Formulation

Key Feature

Example Reference

Nanogel for Tumor Therapy

Enhanced EPR-based accumulation

Park et al., 2021

Thermoresponsive In Situ Gel

Sol–gel transition at body temperature

Roy & Gupta, 2020

Magnetic Hydrogel Implant

External field-guided localization

Tran & Balkus, 2020

Multi-Drug Loaded Matrix

Sequential release of synergistic therapies

Leach et al., 2021

Specific Therapeutic Applications

Cancer Therapy

Conventional chemotherapy is often associated with systemic toxicity and low tumor specificity[25]. Hydrogels help localize chemotherapeutic agents at tumor sites, exploiting unique tumoral conditions like pH or enzyme overexpression for triggered release. Injectable formulations can be placed directly into or near the tumor to form a depot, maintaining high local drug concentrations.

Combination Treatments

In cancer, combination therapies—e.g., chemotherapy and immunotherapy—can be delivered via hydrogels to achieve synergistic effects[26]. Co-encapsulation of drugs with different mechanisms can enhance overall efficacy while reducing exposure-related side effects.

Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration

Hydrogel-based wound dressings keep the wound environment moist, promoting cell migration and nutrient exchange [27]. Incorporation of antimicrobial agents reduces infection risk, while encapsulated growth factors stimulate tissue repair [28]. In tissue engineering, biodegradable hydrogel scaffolds seeded with cells can regenerate damaged tissues with minimal surgical intervention [29].

Ophthalmic Delivery

Ocular drug delivery is complicated by tear turnover and limited corneal permeability [30]. Hydrogels in contact lenses enable extended-release therapies, improving efficacy over conventional eye drops. For posterior eye diseases (e.g., macular degeneration), injectable hydrogels can be placed in the vitreous cavity to deliver drugs over weeks or months.

Oral Drug Delivery

Oral hydrogels can protect acid-labile drugs in the stomach and release them in specific intestinal regions. Mucoadhesive properties extend gastric residence time, enhancing drug absorption. pH-responsive formulations can further refine release, targeting the colon or other GI segments[31].

Transdermal and Topical Applications

Hydrogel patches are favored for transdermal delivery of analgesics, hormones, or nicotine, thanks to their comfortable adhesion and high water content. The hydrated matrix improves skin permeability while reducing irritation.

Neurological Disorders

Surmounting the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a major obstacle in CNS drug delivery. Injectable hydrogels can be administered intracranially for localized release of therapeutics aimed at treating conditions like glioblastoma or Parkinson’s disease [32]. Certain enzyme-responsive hydrogels can degrade selectively in neural regions, tailoring drug delivery to pathological sites [33]. Therapeutic applications of hydrogels are summarized in table 4.

Table 4: Therapeutic Applications of Hydrogel-Based Delivery

Application

Advantages

Notable Example

Cancer Therapy

Localized and/or triggered release

Injectable chemo-immuno hydrogel

Wound Healing

Moist environment, can include drugs

Antimicrobial hydrogel dressings

Ophthalmic Delivery

Extended ocular residence time

Contact lenses with drug elution

Oral Delivery

Protection from GI conditions

pH-responsive hydrogel capsules

Neurological Disorders

Bypass BBB, targeted release

Intracranial hydrogel implants

Safety, Toxicology, And Regulatory Considerations

Biocompatibility and Toxicity

Although often viewed as biocompatible, hydrogels require careful validation. Unreacted monomers or crosslinkers may cause inflammation. Degradation byproducts, if toxic, can incite immune responses[34]. Preclinical tests generally include in vitro cytotoxicity assays, hemocompatibility studies, and in vivo safety assessments.

Regulatory Pathways

Regulatory frameworks classify hydrogel-based systems as medical devices, drug-device combinations, or biologics, depending on their composition and intended use. Maintaining consistent polymer quality, reproducible crosslinking, and stable product performance is essential for meeting standards set by agencies like the FDA or EMA. Advanced hydrogels incorporating nanoscale or genetically active components face additional scrutiny [35].

Manufacturing Challenges

Scaling up hydrogel production involves controlling reaction parameters, ensuring batch uniformity, and managing sterilization. Some hydrogels degrade under certain sterilization methods (e.g., autoclaving), necessitating alternative approaches[36].Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines require robust documentation and quality assurance at every stage.

Challenges And Future Perspectives

Remaining Limitations

Hydrogel performance can be hindered by modest mechanical strength, which can be insufficient for load-bearing or long-term implantation [37]. Complex formulations that incorporate multiple triggers or therapeutics raise manufacturing and stability concerns[38]. Immune reactions, albeit less common with well-characterized polymers, can still occur under certain conditions[39].

Emerging Directions

  • Bioactive Hydrogels: Incorporating living cells, engineered vesicles, or growth factors for tissue regeneration or immunomodulation.
  • Precision Medicine: Designing hydrogels tailored to individual patient biomarkers or disease states.
  • Hybrid Bioelectronic Systems: Integrating electronics to enable external control, real-time sensing, and adaptive therapy.

Synergy with Other Technologies

Microfluidic platforms can create well-defined hydrogel microparticles, optimizing size, shape, and drug loading [40]. Wearable sensors and wireless devices may couple with hydrogel patches for controlled dosing based on biometric feedback. Interdisciplinary cooperation is crucial to translate these advanced concepts into clinical solutions.

Clinical Translation and Market Outlook

Growing interest from pharmaceutical companies underscores the commercial potential of hydrogel-based systems. Established uses in contact lenses and wound dressings foreshadow the feasibility of more complex platforms. Ultimately, the successful adoption of advanced hydrogels will depend on cost-effectiveness, clinical validation, and regulatory pathways.

CONCLUSION

Hydrogels have come a long way from their origins in contact lenses and basic sustained-release formulations. Ongoing innovations in polymer science, nanotechnology, and fabrication methods have enabled advanced hydrogel systems that respond to stimuli, release multiple therapeutic agents, and integrate seamlessly with biological tissues. These materials are now central to a range of applications, including targeted cancer therapy, wound healing, ophthalmology, and neurological treatments. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in manufacturing, regulatory approval, and ensuring consistent performance across variable physiological conditions. Continued interdisciplinary research—bridging materials science, clinical medicine, and engineering—will be vital for resolving these limitations. As the field advances, hydrogel-based drug delivery systems are poised to become even more sophisticated, paving the way for personalized medicine and integrative therapeutic strategies that promise higher efficacy, lower toxicity, and improved patient experiences.

REFERENCES

  1. Baryakova, T. H., Pogostin, B. H., Langer, R., & McHugh, K. J. (2023). Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems. Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 22(5), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00670-0
  2. Zöller, K., To, D., & Bernkop-Schnürch, A. (2025). Biomedical applications of functional hydrogels: Innovative developments, relevant clinical trials and advanced products. Biomaterials, 312, 122718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122718
  3. Zhu J. (2010). Bioactive modification of Polyethylene glycol hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31(17), 4639–4656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044
  4. Ho, T. C., Chang, C. C., Chan, H. P., Chung, T. W., Shu, C. W., Chuang, K. P., Duh, T. H., Yang, M. H., & Tyan, Y. C. (2022). Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 27(9), 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092902
  5. Raina, N., Pahwa, R., Bhattacharya, J., Paul, A. K., Nissapatorn, V., de Lourdes Pereira, M., Oliveira, S. M. R., Dolma, K. G., Rahmatullah, M., Wilairatana, P., & Gupta, M. (2022). Drug Delivery Strategies and Biomedical Significance of Hydrogels: Translational Considerations. Pharmaceutics, 14(3), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030574
  6. Eun Seok Gil, Samuel M. Hudson, Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates, Progress in Polymer Science, Volume 29, Issue 12,2004,Pages 1173-1222,ISSN 0079-6700,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003.
  7. Hennink, W. E., & van Nostrum, C. F. (2002). Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 54(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00240-x
  8. Enrica Caló, Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy,Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products,European Polymer Journal,Volume 65,2015,Pages 252-267,ISSN 0014-3057,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024.
  9. Buwalda, S. J., Vermonden, T., & Hennink, W. E. (2017). Hydrogels for Therapeutic Delivery: Current Developments and Future Directions. Biomacromolecules, 18(2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01604
  10. Vanderhooft, J. L., Alcoutlabi, M., Magda, J. J., & Prestwich, G. D. (2009). Rheological properties of cross-linked hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromolecular bioscience, 9(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200800141
  11. Hu, B., Gao, J., Lu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Applications of Degradable Hydrogels in Novel Approaches to Disease Treatment and New Modes of Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics, 15(10), 2370. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15102370
  12. Vesvoranan, O., Liu, B. S., Zheng, Y., Wagner, W. L., Sutlive, J., Chen, Z., Khalil, H. A., Ackermann, M., & Mentzer, S. J. (2023). Active Loading of Pectin Hydrogels for Targeted Drug Delivery. Polymers, 15(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010092
  13. Lu, P., Ruan, D., Huang, M. et al. Harnessing the potential of hydrogels for advanced therapeutic applications: current achievements and future directions. Sig Transduct Target Ther 9, 166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01852-x
  14. Grabska-Zieli?ska, S. (2024). Cross-Linking Agents in Three-Component Materials Dedicated to Biomedical Applications: A Review. Polymers, 16(18), 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182679
  15. Klouda, L., & Mikos, A. G. (2008). Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V, 68(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.02.025
  16. Xing, Y., Zeng, B., & Yang, W. (2022). Light responsive hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 10, 1075670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1075670
  17. Altunta?, E., Özkan, B., Güngör, S., & Özsoy, Y. (2023). Biopolymer-Based Nanogel Approach in Drug Delivery: Basic Concept and Current Developments. Pharmaceutics, 15(6), 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15061644
  18. Lavrentev, F. V., Shilovskikh, V. V., Alabusheva, V. S., Yurova, V. Y., Nikitina, A. A., Ulasevich, S. A., & Skorb, E. V. (2023). Diffusion-Limited Processes in Hydrogels with Chosen Applications from Drug Delivery to Electronic Components. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 28(15), 5931. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155931
  19. Caccavo, D., Cascone, S., Lamberti, G., Barba, A. A., & Larsson, A. (2016). Swellable Hydrogel-based Systems for Controlled Drug Delivery. InTech. doi: 10.5772/61792
  20. Zhang, Y., & Wu, B. M. (2023). Current Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels as Smart Drug Delivery Carriers. Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 9(10), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9100838
  21. Alex, M., Alsawaftah, N. M., & Husseini, G. A. (2024). State-of-All-the-Art and Prospective Hydrogel-Based Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems. Applied Sciences, 14(7), 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072926
  22. Chehelgerdi, M., Chehelgerdi, M., Allela, O. Q. B., Pecho, R. D. C., Jayasankar, N., Rao, D. P., Thamaraikani, T., Vasanthan, M., Viktor, P., Lakshmaiya, N., Saadh, M. J., Amajd, A., Abo-Zaid, M. A., Castillo-Acobo, R. Y., Ismail, A. H., Amin, A. H., & Akhavan-Sigari, R. (2023). Progressing nanotechnology to improve targeted cancer treatment: overcoming hurdles in its clinical implementation. Molecular cancer, 22(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01865-0
  23. Tan, H., & Marra, K. G. (2010). Injectable, Biodegradable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials, 3(3), 1746-1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031746
  24. Agrawal, A., & Hussain, C. M. (2023). 3D-Printed Hydrogel for Diverse Applications: A Review. Gels, 9(12), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9120960
  25. Nidhi Jain, Mona Kejariwal, Faisal Islam Chowdhury, I.M. Noor, Serguei Savilov, M.Z.A. Yahya, Markus Diantoro, Pramod K Singh,Synthesis, characterization and application of hydrogel for cancer treatment,Chemical Physics Impact,Volume 9,2024,100737,ISSN 2667-0224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100737.
  26. Sun, Q., Bai, X., Sofias, A. M., van der Meel, R., Ruiz-Hernandez, E., Storm, G., Hennink, W. E., De Geest, B., Kiessling, F., Yu, H. J., Lammers, T., & Shi, Y. (2020). Cancer nanomedicine meets immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges. Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 41(7), 954–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-020-0448-9
  27. Anjum, S., Arora, A., Alam, M. S., & Gupta, B. (2016). Development of antimicrobial and scar preventive chitosan hydrogel wound dressings. International journal of pharmaceutics, 508(1-2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.013
  28. Huebsch, N., & Mooney, D. J. (2009). Inspiration and application in the evolution of biomaterials. Nature, 462(7272), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08601
  29. Cota Quintero, J. L., Ramos-Payán, R., Romero-Quintana, J. G., Ayala-Ham, A., Bermúdez, M., & Aguilar-Medina, E. M. (2025). Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds: Advancing Bone Regeneration Through Tissue Engineering. Gels, 11(3), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11030175
  30. Truong D, Wu KY, Nguyen L, Tran SD. Advancements in hydrogel technology for ocular drug delivery. Explor BioMat-X. 2024;1:331–52. https://doi.org/10.37349/ebmx.2024.00023
  31. Sharpe, L. A., Daily, A. M., Horava, S. D., & Peppas, N. A. (2014). Therapeutic applications of hydrogels in oral drug delivery. Expert opinion on drug delivery, 11(6), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.902047
  32. Anirud, Ursula. (2025). Overcoming the Blood-Brain Barrier, Strategies and Advances in Therapeutic Delivery: A Literature Review. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal. 9. 1-9. 10.26685/urncst.774.
  33. Billah, Reduwan & Mondal, Md. Ibrahim H. & Somoal, Sazzad & Pervez, M. & Haque, Md. (2019). Enzyme-Responsive Hydrogels. 10.1007/978-3-319-77830-3_62.
  34. Butenko, S., Nagalla, R.R., Guerrero-Juarez, C.F. et al. Hydrogel crosslinking modulates macrophages, fibroblasts, and their communication, during wound healing. Nat Commun 15, 6820 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50072-y
  35. Mohapatra, S., Mirza, M. A., Hilles, A. R., Zakir, F., Gomes, A. C., Ansari, M. J., Iqbal, Z., & Mahmood, S. (2021). Biomedical Application, Patent Repository, Clinical Trial and Regulatory Updates on Hydrogel: An Extensive Review. Gels, 7(4), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7040207
  36. Rafael, D., Andrade, F., Martinez-Trucharte, F., Basas, J., Seras-Franzoso, J., Palau, M., Gomis, X., Pérez-Burgos, M., Blanco, A., López-Fernández, A., Vélez, R., Abasolo, I., Aguirre, M., Gavaldà, J., & Schwartz, S., Jr (2019). Sterilization Procedure for Temperature-Sensitive Hydrogels Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles for Clinical Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 9(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030380
  37. Ho, T. C., Chang, C. C., Chan, H. P., Chung, T. W., Shu, C. W., Chuang, K. P., Duh, T. H., Yang, M. H., & Tyan, Y. C. (2022). Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 27(9), 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092902
  38. Caliari, S. R., & Burdick, J. A. (2016). A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nature methods, 13(5), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3839
  39. Weiss, A. M., Hossainy, S., Rowan, S. J., Hubbell, J. A., & Esser-Kahn, A. P. (2022). Immunostimulatory Polymers as Adjuvants, Immunotherapies, and Delivery Systems. Macromolecules, 55(16), 6913–6937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00854
  40. Li, W. Zhang, L., Ge, X., , Xu, B., , Zhang, W., , Qu, L., , Choi, C. H., , Xu, J., , Zhang, A., , Lee, H., , & Weitz, D. A., (2018). Microfluidic fabrication of microparticles for biomedical applications. Chemical Society reviews, 47(15), 5646–5683. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00263g.

Reference

  1. Baryakova, T. H., Pogostin, B. H., Langer, R., & McHugh, K. J. (2023). Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems. Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 22(5), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00670-0
  2. Zöller, K., To, D., & Bernkop-Schnürch, A. (2025). Biomedical applications of functional hydrogels: Innovative developments, relevant clinical trials and advanced products. Biomaterials, 312, 122718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122718
  3. Zhu J. (2010). Bioactive modification of Polyethylene glycol hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31(17), 4639–4656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044
  4. Ho, T. C., Chang, C. C., Chan, H. P., Chung, T. W., Shu, C. W., Chuang, K. P., Duh, T. H., Yang, M. H., & Tyan, Y. C. (2022). Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 27(9), 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092902
  5. Raina, N., Pahwa, R., Bhattacharya, J., Paul, A. K., Nissapatorn, V., de Lourdes Pereira, M., Oliveira, S. M. R., Dolma, K. G., Rahmatullah, M., Wilairatana, P., & Gupta, M. (2022). Drug Delivery Strategies and Biomedical Significance of Hydrogels: Translational Considerations. Pharmaceutics, 14(3), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030574
  6. Eun Seok Gil, Samuel M. Hudson, Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates, Progress in Polymer Science, Volume 29, Issue 12,2004,Pages 1173-1222,ISSN 0079-6700,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003.
  7. Hennink, W. E., & van Nostrum, C. F. (2002). Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 54(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00240-x
  8. Enrica Caló, Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy,Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products,European Polymer Journal,Volume 65,2015,Pages 252-267,ISSN 0014-3057,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024.
  9. Buwalda, S. J., Vermonden, T., & Hennink, W. E. (2017). Hydrogels for Therapeutic Delivery: Current Developments and Future Directions. Biomacromolecules, 18(2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01604
  10. Vanderhooft, J. L., Alcoutlabi, M., Magda, J. J., & Prestwich, G. D. (2009). Rheological properties of cross-linked hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromolecular bioscience, 9(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200800141
  11. Hu, B., Gao, J., Lu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Applications of Degradable Hydrogels in Novel Approaches to Disease Treatment and New Modes of Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics, 15(10), 2370. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15102370
  12. Vesvoranan, O., Liu, B. S., Zheng, Y., Wagner, W. L., Sutlive, J., Chen, Z., Khalil, H. A., Ackermann, M., & Mentzer, S. J. (2023). Active Loading of Pectin Hydrogels for Targeted Drug Delivery. Polymers, 15(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010092
  13. Lu, P., Ruan, D., Huang, M. et al. Harnessing the potential of hydrogels for advanced therapeutic applications: current achievements and future directions. Sig Transduct Target Ther 9, 166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01852-x
  14. Grabska-Zieli?ska, S. (2024). Cross-Linking Agents in Three-Component Materials Dedicated to Biomedical Applications: A Review. Polymers, 16(18), 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16182679
  15. Klouda, L., & Mikos, A. G. (2008). Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V, 68(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.02.025
  16. Xing, Y., Zeng, B., & Yang, W. (2022). Light responsive hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 10, 1075670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1075670
  17. Altunta?, E., Özkan, B., Güngör, S., & Özsoy, Y. (2023). Biopolymer-Based Nanogel Approach in Drug Delivery: Basic Concept and Current Developments. Pharmaceutics, 15(6), 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15061644
  18. Lavrentev, F. V., Shilovskikh, V. V., Alabusheva, V. S., Yurova, V. Y., Nikitina, A. A., Ulasevich, S. A., & Skorb, E. V. (2023). Diffusion-Limited Processes in Hydrogels with Chosen Applications from Drug Delivery to Electronic Components. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 28(15), 5931. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155931
  19. Caccavo, D., Cascone, S., Lamberti, G., Barba, A. A., & Larsson, A. (2016). Swellable Hydrogel-based Systems for Controlled Drug Delivery. InTech. doi: 10.5772/61792
  20. Zhang, Y., & Wu, B. M. (2023). Current Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels as Smart Drug Delivery Carriers. Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 9(10), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9100838
  21. Alex, M., Alsawaftah, N. M., & Husseini, G. A. (2024). State-of-All-the-Art and Prospective Hydrogel-Based Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems. Applied Sciences, 14(7), 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072926
  22. Chehelgerdi, M., Chehelgerdi, M., Allela, O. Q. B., Pecho, R. D. C., Jayasankar, N., Rao, D. P., Thamaraikani, T., Vasanthan, M., Viktor, P., Lakshmaiya, N., Saadh, M. J., Amajd, A., Abo-Zaid, M. A., Castillo-Acobo, R. Y., Ismail, A. H., Amin, A. H., & Akhavan-Sigari, R. (2023). Progressing nanotechnology to improve targeted cancer treatment: overcoming hurdles in its clinical implementation. Molecular cancer, 22(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01865-0
  23. Tan, H., & Marra, K. G. (2010). Injectable, Biodegradable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials, 3(3), 1746-1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031746
  24. Agrawal, A., & Hussain, C. M. (2023). 3D-Printed Hydrogel for Diverse Applications: A Review. Gels, 9(12), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9120960
  25. Nidhi Jain, Mona Kejariwal, Faisal Islam Chowdhury, I.M. Noor, Serguei Savilov, M.Z.A. Yahya, Markus Diantoro, Pramod K Singh,Synthesis, characterization and application of hydrogel for cancer treatment,Chemical Physics Impact,Volume 9,2024,100737,ISSN 2667-0224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100737.
  26. Sun, Q., Bai, X., Sofias, A. M., van der Meel, R., Ruiz-Hernandez, E., Storm, G., Hennink, W. E., De Geest, B., Kiessling, F., Yu, H. J., Lammers, T., & Shi, Y. (2020). Cancer nanomedicine meets immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges. Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 41(7), 954–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-020-0448-9
  27. Anjum, S., Arora, A., Alam, M. S., & Gupta, B. (2016). Development of antimicrobial and scar preventive chitosan hydrogel wound dressings. International journal of pharmaceutics, 508(1-2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.013
  28. Huebsch, N., & Mooney, D. J. (2009). Inspiration and application in the evolution of biomaterials. Nature, 462(7272), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08601
  29. Cota Quintero, J. L., Ramos-Payán, R., Romero-Quintana, J. G., Ayala-Ham, A., Bermúdez, M., & Aguilar-Medina, E. M. (2025). Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds: Advancing Bone Regeneration Through Tissue Engineering. Gels, 11(3), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11030175
  30. Truong D, Wu KY, Nguyen L, Tran SD. Advancements in hydrogel technology for ocular drug delivery. Explor BioMat-X. 2024;1:331–52. https://doi.org/10.37349/ebmx.2024.00023
  31. Sharpe, L. A., Daily, A. M., Horava, S. D., & Peppas, N. A. (2014). Therapeutic applications of hydrogels in oral drug delivery. Expert opinion on drug delivery, 11(6), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.902047
  32. Anirud, Ursula. (2025). Overcoming the Blood-Brain Barrier, Strategies and Advances in Therapeutic Delivery: A Literature Review. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal. 9. 1-9. 10.26685/urncst.774.
  33. Billah, Reduwan & Mondal, Md. Ibrahim H. & Somoal, Sazzad & Pervez, M. & Haque, Md. (2019). Enzyme-Responsive Hydrogels. 10.1007/978-3-319-77830-3_62.
  34. Butenko, S., Nagalla, R.R., Guerrero-Juarez, C.F. et al. Hydrogel crosslinking modulates macrophages, fibroblasts, and their communication, during wound healing. Nat Commun 15, 6820 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50072-y
  35. Mohapatra, S., Mirza, M. A., Hilles, A. R., Zakir, F., Gomes, A. C., Ansari, M. J., Iqbal, Z., & Mahmood, S. (2021). Biomedical Application, Patent Repository, Clinical Trial and Regulatory Updates on Hydrogel: An Extensive Review. Gels, 7(4), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7040207
  36. Rafael, D., Andrade, F., Martinez-Trucharte, F., Basas, J., Seras-Franzoso, J., Palau, M., Gomis, X., Pérez-Burgos, M., Blanco, A., López-Fernández, A., Vélez, R., Abasolo, I., Aguirre, M., Gavaldà, J., & Schwartz, S., Jr (2019). Sterilization Procedure for Temperature-Sensitive Hydrogels Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles for Clinical Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 9(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030380
  37. Ho, T. C., Chang, C. C., Chan, H. P., Chung, T. W., Shu, C. W., Chuang, K. P., Duh, T. H., Yang, M. H., & Tyan, Y. C. (2022). Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 27(9), 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092902
  38. Caliari, S. R., & Burdick, J. A. (2016). A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nature methods, 13(5), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3839
  39. Weiss, A. M., Hossainy, S., Rowan, S. J., Hubbell, J. A., & Esser-Kahn, A. P. (2022). Immunostimulatory Polymers as Adjuvants, Immunotherapies, and Delivery Systems. Macromolecules, 55(16), 6913–6937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00854
  40. Li, W. Zhang, L., Ge, X., , Xu, B., , Zhang, W., , Qu, L., , Choi, C. H., , Xu, J., , Zhang, A., , Lee, H., , & Weitz, D. A., (2018). Microfluidic fabrication of microparticles for biomedical applications. Chemical Society reviews, 47(15), 5646–5683. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00263g.

Photo
Suripeddi Muralidhar
Corresponding author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Photo
Ramya K.
Co-author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Photo
Gunda Rajeev Sri Sasikar
Co-author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Photo
Gummadi Suvarna Ratnam
Co-author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Photo
Gundabathula Poornima
Co-author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Photo
Jalluri Ramya
Co-author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Photo
Jampana Sai Ananth Varma
Co-author

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Suripeddi Muralidhar*, Ramya K., Gunda Rajeev Sri Sasikar, Gummadi Suvarna Ratnam, Gundabathula Poornima, Jalluri Ramya, Jampana Sai Ananth Varma, Hydrogel-Based Drug Delivery: From Traditional Formulations to Advanced Applications, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 4, 3409-3423 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15309586

More related articles
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Profile of Benraliz...
Dr. M. Govardhan , Shaik Rizwana , Alefiya kotawala, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Wound Healing Cream ...
Jyoti Prakash , Rajendra Kumar , Rukhmani Raman Sahu, Tilak Kumar...
Herbal Drug Formulation: Quality Aspects and Standards...
Ruturaj Bhosale, Seema Shinde, Dr. Nilesh Chougule, ...
Liquid – Liquid Fractionation and Evaluation of In-Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Act...
Shambhulingaiah. H. M., Kruthika K. N., Harshitha M. P. M., Jashwini, Shivatejaswi J. M., Sudeep B. ...
Related Articles
Novel Drug Delivery System for Treating Neuropsychological Disorder ...
ABHAY KAMBLE , NAKUL KATHAR , GAJANAN SANAP , ...
Andrographolide Modulates Giardia Gene Expression at Transcriptomic and Proteomi...
Sandipan Ganguly, Arjun Ghosh, Tapas Haldar, Sanjib Kumar Sardar, ...
A Review on New Drug Regimens in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculos...
Shubham Kumar , Abhishek Shrivastava, Dr.Jitendra Banweer, ...
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Profile of Benralizumab...
Dr. M. Govardhan , Shaik Rizwana , Alefiya kotawala, ...
More related articles
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Profile of Benralizumab...
Dr. M. Govardhan , Shaik Rizwana , Alefiya kotawala, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Wound Healing Cream Containing Tectona Grandis Ext...
Jyoti Prakash , Rajendra Kumar , Rukhmani Raman Sahu, Tilak Kumar Sinha, Mayank Borkar, Suchita Kuju...
A Comprehensive Review on Drug Profile of Benralizumab...
Dr. M. Govardhan , Shaik Rizwana , Alefiya kotawala, ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Wound Healing Cream Containing Tectona Grandis Ext...
Jyoti Prakash , Rajendra Kumar , Rukhmani Raman Sahu, Tilak Kumar Sinha, Mayank Borkar, Suchita Kuju...