Guided Growth and Early Malocclusion Correction: An Orthodontic Review

Abstract

The term interceptive orthodontics, as used in this paper, refers to the early treatment of developing occlusal issues, specifically those related to local factors, crowding, and mandibular displacements during closure from the resting position. It represents a phase within the science and art of orthodontics that focuses on identifying and correcting potential irregularities and malpositions in the developing dentofacial complex. A key component of pediatric dental care is the guidance of eruption and development of both the primary and permanent dentitions. This guidance plays a crucial role in achieving a permanent dentition that is harmonious, functional, and esthetically pleasing. The goal of this article is to serve as a straightforward guide for accurately diagnosing dental anomalies and selecting the most appropriate treatment for each individual case.

Keywords

Introduction

Interceptive orthodontics is a crucial phase of treatment carried out during the mixed dentition period, typically between ages 6 and 12. It aims to identify and address developing malocclusions early, preventing them from becoming more severe and reducing the need for complex treatment later. Unlike preventive orthodontics, which focuses on avoiding issues, interceptive therapy corrects problems such as crowding, jaw misalignment, and eruption disturbances. These early interventions are often simpler, more cost-effective, and can guide normal dental and facial development. As understanding of growth patterns and dentofacial function advances, early orthodontic care becomes more precise and biologically guided. While not all cases can be fully resolved during this stage, interceptive treatment plays a significant role in minimizing treatment complexity in the permanent dentition. Conditions like anterior crossbite or skeletal Class III malocclusions particularly benefit from early correction. This dissertation highlights the importance of timely diagnosis, routine screening, and early management in improving long-term oral health outcomes in children.

Orthodontics In 3 Millennia: An Overview

In the 18th-century Clinical Period, early orthodontic pioneers like Fox, Angle, and the McCoys advocated treating malocclusion as soon as it appeared, while others such as Mershon and Hellman warned against premature intervention without proper monitoring, as misunderstandings about growth often led to overtreatment. Over time, selective early intervention gained support for specific cases like Class III malocclusions and crossbites, provided it was managed by skilled practitioners. During the 19th-century Academic Period, European functional orthopedic approaches became popular but were later questioned by studies from Livieratos, Johnston, and Gianelly, which showed little advantage in early or two-phase treatments; most malocclusions could be treated effectively in a single phase during late mixed dentition, making early treatment more a matter of convenience than necessity. In the 20th century, modern reassessment revealed risks of early treatment such as root damage and patient burnout and found limited benefit for most Class II cases, with critics noting that two-phase treatments often add no real value, though early assessment remains useful for identifying impactions, arch length discrepancies, and unpredictable Class III growth patterns.

Difference Between Preventive and Interceptive Orthodontics

Preventive and interceptive orthodontics are often used interchangeably, but they differ significantly in timing and purpose. Preventive orthodontics is carried out when the dentition and occlusion are still normal, aiming to eliminate potential causes of malocclusion through measures like space maintenance, fluoridation, and good oral hygiene falling under primary prevention. In contrast, interceptive orthodontics is a secondary preventive approach, initiated when early signs of malocclusion are already present. It seeks to halt the progression of developing issues, such as crowding or jaw discrepancies, before they become more severe. As Graber notes, interceptive treatment deals with malocclusion as a "fait accompli," requiring timely action to restore normal growth and avoid more complex corrective procedures later. While true prevention of malocclusion is only possible in limited cases, studies suggest that about 25% of malocclusions can be effectively intercepted using current techniques available to general practitioners.

Difficulties In Interceptive Orthodontics

Misperceptions about early orthodontic treatment often arise from focusing on appliances rather than treatment goals. True objectives include removing etiologic factors and correcting skeletal issues, not simply aligning teeth. Overemphasis on one appliance type over another overlooks that all systems have limitations, often stemming from misunderstanding treatment goals. Improper early intervention can misdirect growth and harm outcomes. While two-phase (diphasic) treatment may reduce clinic time, it can prolong overall treatment, strain patient cooperation, and complicate future care. Early diagnosis is less certain due to ongoing growth, requiring careful planning and regular reassessment, which is often overlooked in favor of appliance-based approaches.

Prevention And Intervention In Mixed Dentition Period

Preventive Orthodontics

Preventive orthodontics focuses on maintaining normal occlusion and preventing the development of malocclusion through early detection and intervention. Parental counselling, either during pregnancy or after childbirth, plays a key role in promoting a child’s oral health by encouraging good habits early on. Caries control through dietary guidance, proper hygiene, fluoride application, sealants, and parental education helps reduce rampant and nursing caries, which can impact tooth alignment. Preservation of primary teeth is essential since they act as natural space maintainers, guiding proper eruption of permanent teeth. Managing ankylosed primary teeth through early diagnosis and extraction when necessary prevents eruption disturbances. Correction of occlusal prematurities via selective grinding eliminates premature contacts that could cause abnormal jaw movement or bruxism. Avoiding occlusal damage from orthopedic appliances like the Milwaukee brace ensures normal mandibular growth. Removal of supernumerary teeth prevents eruption blockage and misalignment, while space maintenance following premature tooth loss prevents drifting of adjacent teeth and maintains arch integrity. Management of deeply locked first permanent molars involves timely correction of ectopic eruption to preserve arch length and prevent malocclusion. Lastly, management of abnormal frenal attachment through surgical or orthodontic intervention helps eliminate midline diastema and promotes proper tooth alignment and esthetics.Common Interceptive Orthodontic Procedures

Interceptive Orthodontics

Interceptive orthodontics focuses on identifying and correcting developing malocclusions during the mixed dentition phase to guide normal growth and minimize the need for complex treatment later. Serial extraction, introduced by Kjellgren in 1929, involves the planned removal of specific teeth to manage crowding resulting from a mismatch between tooth size and jaw space. Correction of developing crossbite, whether single-tooth, unilateral, or bilateral, is crucial to prevent long-term occlusal dysfunction. Control of abnormal habits, such as thumb or finger sucking, helps prevent malocclusions and ensures proper orofacial development. Space regaining techniques are used to restore lost arch length due to premature tooth loss or drifting, with the degree of crowding determining whether preservation, regaining, expansion, or extraction is needed. Muscular exercises strengthen orofacial muscles, promoting balanced occlusal development. Interception of skeletal malrelation allows early correction of jaw discrepancies through growth modification. Finally, removal of soft tissue and bony barriers facilitates the eruption of delayed permanent teeth by addressing causes such as retained, ankylosed, or supernumerary teeth, ensuring proper eruption and alignment.

Interceptive and preventive orthodontic procedures help reduce the severity of developing malocclusions, allowing for more stable and conservative (often non-extraction) corrective treatments. While some cases may require a two-phase approach, the outcomes are often more effective. Rather than being a topic of controversy, these early interventions should involve a team-based approach focused on early detection, patient and parent counselling, cross-referral, and timely management for long-term benefits.

Benefits and Phases of Early Orthodontic Intervention in Children

Early orthodontic treatment, often initiated around age 7, focuses on guiding the growth of the jaws, teeth, and facial structures before the permanent dentition is complete. Phase-One, or interceptive treatment, addresses developing problems such as crowding, crossbites, open bites, or jaw discrepancies during the mixed dentition phase when growth can be effectively influenced. Early correction creates space for erupting permanent teeth, supports proper jaw development, and reduces the need for extractions or complex procedures later. The main goals are to guide jaw growth, ensure adequate space for all teeth, and establish proper occlusion. Advantages include improved control over skeletal development, enhanced facial balance, and the prevention of more serious orthodontic problems in the future. Early diagnosis offers numerous benefits preventing the progression of malocclusion, improving long-term stability, correcting bite issues, and enhancing facial aesthetics and oral function. However, early treatment is contraindicated in cases of emotional immaturity, lack of cooperation, or undue social or parental pressure, as these factors can hinder successful outcomes.

Monitoring tooth development is essential after Phase-One treatment, as the teeth are not yet in their final positions. Regular recall visits every six months allow for close observation of eruption patterns and timely extraction of selected primary teeth if necessary to support proper alignment.

Phase-Two orthodontic treatment typically begins once most permanent teeth have erupted and involves placing full braces on both arches to achieve ideal alignment and jaw coordination. This phase aims to produce a stable, functional, and aesthetically pleasing result that harmonizes the teeth with the lips, cheeks, tongue, and opposing dentition. Treatment duration usually spans about two years, followed by a retention phase to maintain results. Overall, early orthodontic intervention allows orthodontists and pedodontists to effectively guide growth and development, but timing is crucial; intervening too early can be as problematic as treating too late. Regular dental check-ups and timely, well-planned treatment are therefore essential for achieving optimal outcomes in growing children.

DISCUSSION

Interceptive orthodontics, typically applied during the mixed dentition phase (ages 6–12), aims to manage developing malocclusions early to reduce the need for complex corrective treatment later. It differs from preventive orthodontics, which addresses potential issues before they arise, and from corrective treatment, which is done once permanent dentition is established (Graber, 1997; Tweed, 1950).Definitions of interceptive orthodontics vary. Bass (1996) described it as mixed dentition treatment to prevent malocclusion, while Woodside (1996) considered it an early phase of appliance therapy. Richardson (1995) emphasized that early intervention can minimize severity and duration of future treatment.

Common interceptive procedures include space maintenance, serial extractions, crossbite correction, and management of habits or delayed eruption (Proffit, 1993; Kjellgren, 1947; Munns, 1981). These approaches are generally simpler, cost-effective, and help guide normal dental and facial development. However, they are most effective when timed appropriately, requiring regular monitoring and accurate diagnosis.Despite clear benefits, interceptive treatment has limitations. Complex cases especially involving skeletal discrepancies like Class III malocclusions often require a second treatment phase or surgical correction if left untreated (McNamara, 2002; Turpin, 1996). Ackerman and Proffit (1997) noted that only 15–20% of malocclusions are fully resolved with early treatment alone.

In conclusion, interceptive orthodontics can improve long-term outcomes, reduce treatment complexity, and support better facial aesthetics when used judiciously. Collaboration between general dentists, orthodontists, and parents along with early screening is essential to maximize its effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Misunderstandings about interceptive orthodontics stem from the belief that early treatment eliminates the need for later care. Since growth continues into adolescence, results of early intervention aren’t always predictable. Accurate diagnosis and timing are crucial transverse issues should be corrected early, while dentoalveolar problems can wait until full dentition. Early treatment effectively addresses overjet, crossbite, and alignment problems, though vertical issues like deep or open bites respond less predictably. Overall, interceptive care reduces malocclusion severity and simplifies future treatment, but follow-up in permanent dentition is often required.

REFERENCES

1. Graber TM. Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. 1996, W. B. Saunders Company; pg. 43.
2. Tweed CH. Treatment planning and therapy in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1963;49: 881-906.
3. Bass NM. Interceptive orthodontics, Keynote address, European Orthodontic Society Conference, 1996 Abstracts p. 10.
4. Woodside DG. Interceptive orthodontics, Keynote address, European Orthodontic Society Conference, 1996 Abstracts p. 19.
5. Richardson A. Interceptive Orthodontics. ged ed. BDJ Books, London.
6. Nimri KA. Applicability of interceptive orthodontics in the community. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1997;24;3: 223-228.
7. King GJ, Hall CV, Milgrom P, Grembowski DE. Early orthodontic treatment as a means to increase access for children enrolled in Medicaid in Washington state. Am Dent Assoc 2006;137: 86-94.
8. Kerosuo H. The role of prevention and simple interceptive measures in reducing the need for orthodontic treatment. Med Princ Pract 2002;11 Suppl. 1: 16-21.
9. King G], Brudvik P. Effectiveness of interceptive orthodontic treatment in reducing malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137;1: 18-25.
10. Jolley CJ et al. Dental effects of interceptive orthodontic treatment in a Medicaid population: Interim results from a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137;3 :324-33.
11. Munns D. Unerupted incisors. British Journal of Orthodontics 1981; 8:39-42
12. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd ed. 1993, Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pg. 381-382.
13. Kjellgren B. Serial extractions as a corrective procedure in dental orthopaedic therapy. European Orthodontic Society Transactions 1947;134-160.
14. Dewel BF. Serial extractions: its limitations and contraindications in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop 1970;53:904-921.
15. Bogue, EA. Orthodontia of the deciduous teeth, D. Digest, 18: 547-554, 609-617, 671-677, 1912;19: 9-14, 79-88, 146-149, 196-203, 260-265, 365-373, 425-433.
16. Sunnak R, Johal A, Fleming PS. Is orthodontics prior to 11 years of age evidence-based? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2015 May 1;43(5):477-86.
17. Shetty AK, Anandakrishna L, Girish MS, Kamath PS, Usha R. Evaluation of chair side dental care provided to children with special health care needs. Journal of Dental and Orofacial Research. 2015,1975;260-281.
18. Rauten AM, Georgescu C, Popescu MR, Maglaviceanu CF, Popescu D, Gheorghe D, Camen A, Munteanu C, Olteanu M. Orthodontic treatment needs in mixed dentition–for children of 6 and 9 years old. Romanian J Oral Rehabilit. 2016 Jan 1;8(1):28-39.
19. Szuhanek C, Jianu R, Schiller E, Grigore A, Levai C, Popa A. Acrylic versus silicone in interceptive orthodontics. Materiale Plastice. 2016 Dec 1;53:759-60.
20. Paranna S, Shetty P, Anandakrishna L, Rawat A. Distalization of Maxillary First Permanent Molar by Pendulum Appliance in Mixed Dentition Period. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):299-301.
21. Ibrahim MM. Preventive and Interceptive Orthodontic Treatment Needs of 6 to 9 Years Old Egyptian Children (Prevalence Cross-Sectional Study). EC Dental Science. 2018;17:1009-25.
22. Tecco S, Baldini A, Nakaš E, Primozic J. Orthodontics in Growing Patients: Clinical/Biological Evidence and Technological Advancement 2018. BioMed Research International. 2018 Nov 28;2018:7281846.
23. Edith M. Interceptive Orthodontics: A Synthesis of Clinical Versus Public Health Methodology. J Dent Oral Health. 2019;6:1-5.
24. Currell SD, Vaughan M, Dreyer CW. Interceptive orthodontic practices in general dentistry: a cross-sectional study. Australasian Orthodontic Journal. 2019 Nov 1;35(2):152-7.
25. Sarangal H, Namdev R, Rohilla M. Interceptive orthodontics for malaligned anteriors due to supplemental lateral incisor. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences. 2020 May 1;7(2):124-7.
26. Abd Rahman FB, Nivethigaa B, Maheshwari U. Preventive And Interceptive Need In Children Below 10 Years Of Age. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021 Jul 4;8(7):3022-5.
27. Gupta V, Chen J. Removable Appliance Therapy for Interceptive Orthodontic Treatment.1988; pg. 229-240,343-440.
28. Galui S, Pal S. Early orthodontic treatment needed among 6-9-year-old children of West Bengal. Journal of Oral Research and Review. 2021 Jan 1;13(1):12-7.
29. Rajab L, Murad E, Abu-Ghazaleh S. Interceptive and orthodontic treatment provided by pediatric dentists in Jordan. Jordan Medical Journal. 2022 Oct 16;56(4).
30. Alharbi KA, Alharbi IF, Kolarkodi SH. Parental acceptance, knowledge, and awareness toward interceptive orthodontic treatment in children in Saudi Arabia: an online survey. Int J Med Dev Ctries. 2022 Jan 19;6(2):286-92.
31. Baxmann M, Baráth Z, Kárpáti K. Application and Future Utilization of Shellac in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024 May 15;13(10):2917.
32. Pushparekha G, Saxena A, Parihar A, Verma N, Anadeo P. Assessment of Early Orthodontic Treatment Need Using Index for Preventive and Interceptive Orthodontic Treatment Needs Index: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry. 2025 Jan 8;7(3):151-5.