View Article

Abstract

The present study focuses on the formulation and comprehensive evaluation of polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) encapsulating doxorubicin, aiming to enhance targeted delivery and therapeutic efficacy in breast cancer treatment. The biodegradable polymer poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) was employed due to its well-documented biocompatibility and regulatory approval status for drug delivery applications. Nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using the nanoprecipitation technique, a widely used method offering advantages in terms of reproducibility and control over particle characteristics. The optimized formulation exhibited a mean particle size of 158.6 ± 3.4 nm, which falls within the ideal size range for enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor tissues. The negative zeta potential (-21.3 ± 1.8 mV) confirmed colloidal stability, while the encapsulation efficiency of 78.4 ± 2.1% ensured sufficient drug loading. In vitro drug release studies revealed a sustained release profile over 72 hours, critical for minimizing systemic toxicity and enhancing drug accumulation in cancer cells. The release data best fitted first-order kinetics (R² = 0.9812), indicating that the release rate is concentration-dependent, a desirable feature for maintaining therapeutic levels of drug at the target site over time. To assess cytotoxic efficacy, MTT assay was conducted on MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. The PLGA-loaded nanoparticles demonstrated a significantly lower IC?? value (2.9 µg/mL) compared to free doxorubicin (7.4 µg/mL), with p < 0.01, signifying enhanced potency and cellular uptake, potentially due to nanoparticle-mediated endocytosis and sustained intracellular drug retention. In conclusion, the findings underscore the potential of PLGA-based PNPs as an effective and reliable platform for controlled and targeted anticancer drug delivery. The superior cytotoxic profile, sustained release following first-order kinetics, and favorable physicochemical properties collectively position this system as a promising candidate for next-generation chemotherapeutic strategies.

Keywords

Polymeric Nanoparticles, PLGA, Doxorubicin, Targeted Drug Delivery, Breast Cancer

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the foremost causes of morbidity and mortality globally, with breast cancer being a major contributor among female populations. Despite advances in chemotherapy, conventional anticancer agents such as doxorubicin suffer from limitations including poor selectivity, dose-limiting toxicity, and the development of multidrug resistance (MDR). These challenges highlight the urgent need for novel drug delivery systems that can enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic side effects. Nanotechnology-based approaches, particularly polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), have gained significant attention for cancer therapy. Among the various polymers investigated, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) stands out due to its biodegradability, biocompatibility, and FDA approval for clinical use. PLGA nanoparticles offer several advantages such as prolonged circulation time, controlled drug release, improved drug stability, and potential for passive or active tumor targeting through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.

In this context, doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles provide a promising strategy to overcome the limitations of free doxorubicin. By encapsulating doxorubicin within PLGA, it is possible to achieve a sustained drug release profile, reduce systemic exposure, and enhance cytotoxic activity at the tumor site through improved cellular uptake. The present study is designed to develop and optimize doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles using the nanoprecipitation technique. The prepared formulations are characterized in terms of particle size, zeta potential, encapsulation efficiency, and drug release kinetics. Furthermore, the in vitro cytotoxic activity is evaluated on MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines using the MTT assay to assess the therapeutic potential of the nanoparticles.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Materials

The following materials were used in the present study:

  • Doxorubicin Hydrochloride – obtained from a certified pharmaceutical supplier and used as the model anticancer drug.
  • Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) – with a lactic to glycolic acid ratio of 50:50, procured from a commercial source; used as the biodegradable polymeric carrier.
  • Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) – used as a stabilizer during nanoparticle formation.
  • Acetone – analytical grade, used as an organic solvent for nanoprecipitation.
  • Deionized Water – used throughout the experimental procedures for nanoparticle preparation and washing.

2.2 Method of Preparation

The nanoprecipitation technique was employed to prepare doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles due to its simplicity, reproducibility, and suitability for hydrophobic polymer–drug systems.

Procedure:

  1. Organic Phase Preparation

Doxorubicin hydrochloride (equivalent to the drug-to-polymer ratio of 1:5) and PLGA were accurately weighed and dissolved in 10 mL of acetone, forming the organic phase. The drug-polymer solution was vortexed briefly to ensure complete solubilization.

  1. Aqueous Phase Preparation

The aqueous phase consisted of 20 mL of 1% w/v polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) solution, which served as a stabilizer to prevent nanoparticle aggregation and improve dispersion.

  1. Nanoparticle Formation

The organic phase was added dropwise into the aqueous phase under continuous magnetic stirring at 1200 rpm. The addition was carried out at room temperature to promote spontaneous diffusion of acetone into the aqueous phase, leading to the precipitation of PLGA and the entrapment of doxorubicin within the forming nanoparticles.

  1. Stirring and Solvent Evaporation

After the addition was complete, the emulsion was continuously stirred for 2 hours to allow complete evaporation of acetone, solidification of nanoparticles, and stabilization in suspension.

  1. Purification
    The resulting nanoparticle suspension was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 minutes to separate the nanoparticles from the unencapsulated drug and excess PVA. The pellet was washed three times with deionized water to remove residual PVA and then lyophilized for further analysis.

Process Parameters

Parameter

Value

Drug: Polymer Ratio

1:5

Solvent Phase

10 mL Acetone

Aqueous Phase

20 mL PVA (1% w/v)

Stirring Speed

1200 rpm

Stirring Time

2 hours

3. Optimization via Design of Experiments (DoE)

To optimize the formulation of doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles, a Box-Behnken Design (BBD) was applied with three independent variables, evaluated at three levels (low, medium, high). A total of 17 experimental runs were generated to understand the influence of formulation and process parameters on two key responses: particle size (Y?) and entrapment efficiency (Y?).

3.1 Independent Variables and Their Levels

Factor

Symbol

Low (-1)

Medium (0)

High (+1)

PLGA (%)

X?

0.5

1.0

1.5

PVA (%)

X?

0.5

1.0

1.5

Stirring Speed (rpm)

X?

800

1200

1600

3.2 Design Matrix with Observed Responses

Run

X?: PLGA (%)

X?: PVA (%)

X?: Speed (rpm)

Y?: Particle Size (nm)

Y?: Entrapment Efficiency (%)

1

0.5

0.5

1200

142.3 ± 2.1

65.4 ± 1.7

2

1.5

0.5

1200

178.2 ± 3.5

82.3 ± 1.9

3

0.5

1.5

1200

152.5 ± 2.6

69.8 ± 2.2

4

1.5

1.5

1200

192.1 ± 3.2

85.7 ± 1.5

5

1.0

1.0

800

168.3 ± 2.8

75.1 ± 2.1

6

1.0

1.0

1600

138.4 ± 2.2

73.6 ± 1.8

7

0.5

1.0

800

158.2 ± 3.0

66.9 ± 2.3

8

1.5

1.0

800

181.5 ± 3.6

81.2 ± 2.0

9

0.5

1.0

1600

132.6 ± 2.5

64.7 ± 1.6

10

1.5

1.0

1600

149.7 ± 2.9

79.3 ± 1.8

11

1.0

0.5

800

162.4 ± 3.1

70.2 ± 1.9

12

1.0

1.5

800

176.9 ± 3.3

77.8 ± 2.1

13

1.0

0.5

1600

141.1 ± 2.6

72.5 ± 1.7

14

1.0

1.5

1600

153.8 ± 2.4

76.9 ± 1.6

15

1.0

1.0

1200

158.6 ± 3.4

78.4 ± 2.1

16

1.0

1.0

1200

159.2 ± 2.7

78.1 ± 1.8

17

1.0

1.0

1200

157.8 ± 2.9

78.8 ± 2.0

3.3 Model Evaluation via ANOVA

  • Model F-value: 26.37, indicating the model is statistically significant (p < 0.0001)
  • Lack of Fit: Non-significant (p = 0.2391) – shows the model fits well to the data
  • = 0.9732, Adjusted R² = 0.9567 – confirms high predictability of the model

3.4 Optimization Outcome

The optimal formulation predicted by the BBD model was:

  • PLGA concentration: 1.0%
  • PVA concentration: 1.0%
  • Stirring Speed: 1200 rpm

Predicted responses:

  • Particle size: ~158.6 nm
  • Entrapment efficiency: ~78.4%

4. Characterization

Comprehensive characterization of the optimized doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles was performed to evaluate their physicochemical and morphological properties. The key parameters assessed include particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, and surface morphology using standard analytical techniques.

4.1 Particle Size, Polydispersity Index (PDI), and Zeta Potential

The particle size and surface charge were measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS) via a Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument.

  • Mean Particle Size: 158.6 ± 3.4 nm
  • Polydispersity Index (PDI): 0.179
  • Zeta Potential: -21.3 ± 1.8 mV

The particle size was within the optimal range for passive tumor targeting via the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect. The low PDI value (< 0.2) indicates a narrow size distribution, essential for consistent biological performance. The negative zeta potential contributes to electrostatic stabilization of the nanoparticle suspension, reducing the likelihood of aggregation during storage.

4.2 Entrapment Efficiency (EE%)

The entrapment efficiency was determined by separating free doxorubicin from the nanoparticles using centrifugation, followed by UV-Vis spectrophotometric analysis of the supernatant.

The entrapment efficiency was calculated using the formula:

\text {Entrapment Efficiency (EE%)} = \left ( \frac {\text{Amount of drug entrapped}}{\text{Total amount of drug added}} \right) \times 100

  • Entrapment Efficiency: 78.4 ± 2.1%

The high EE% reflects effective encapsulation of doxorubicin within the PLGA matrix, likely due to hydrophobic interactions between the drug and polymer during nanoprecipitation.

4.3 Morphological Analysis

The morphology of the nanoparticles was assessed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

  • The nanoparticles exhibited a smooth, spherical shape with uniform surface characteristics.
  • No signs of aggregation or fusion were observed, indicating successful stabilization by PVA and adequate surface charge repulsion.

5. In Vitro Drug Release Study

The in vitro drug release profile of the optimized doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles was investigated using the dialysis bag diffusion method in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) at 37?±?0.5?°C under constant stirring (100 rpm). Samples were withdrawn at predetermined time intervals and replaced with fresh medium to maintain sink conditions. The cumulative drug release was quantified by UV-Visible spectrophotometry at λ_max of 480 nm.

5.1 Cumulative Drug Release Profile

5.2 Drug Release Pattern and Kinetic Modeling

The release profile exhibited a biphasic pattern, characterized by:

  • An initial burst release of approximately 21.7% within the first 4 hours, attributed to the release of surface-adsorbed or loosely bound doxorubicin.
  • A sustained release phase over 72

Time (hours)

% Cumulative Drug Release (Mean ± SD)

0

0.0

4

21.7 ± 1.2

8

38.9 ± 2.4

24

65.1 ± 1.8

48

81.3 ± 2.7

72

91.6 ± 3.1

  • hours, likely due to diffusion of drug through the PLGA matrix and subsequent polymer erosion.

To elucidate the mechanism of drug release, the data were fitted to various kinetic models, including Zero-order, First-order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer–Peppas models. Among them:

  • First-order kinetics best described the release profile, with a high correlation coefficient R² = 0.9812, indicating that the drug release rate is concentration-dependent.
  • The Higuchi model also showed good fit (R² = 0.9543), suggesting that Fickian diffusion is a dominant mechanism during the sustained phase.

5.3 Interpretation

The prolonged and controlled release of doxorubicin from PLGA nanoparticles is beneficial for cancer therapy, as it ensures continuous exposure of tumor cells to therapeutic drug levels while minimizing systemic toxicity. The combination of burst release (for immediate therapeutic effect) and sustained release (for maintenance) positions this formulation as a promising candidate for targeted chemotherapy.

6. Cytotoxicity (MTT Assay)

The in vitro cytotoxic potential of doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (Dox-PLGA NPs) was assessed using the MTT assay on MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines. The test was conducted to compare the anticancer efficacy of the nanoparticle formulation with that of free doxorubicin after 48 hours of incubation.

6.1 Methodology

MCF-7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1×10? cells/well and allowed to adhere overnight. The cells were then treated with various concentrations of:

  • Free Doxorubicin
  • Doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (Dox-PLGA NPs)

After 48 hours of incubation, 20 µL of MTT reagent (5 mg/mL) was added to each well, and the plates were incubated for 4 hours. The resulting formazan crystals were solubilized using DMSO, and absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader.

6.2 IC?? Values

6.3 Statistical Analysis

The IC?? values were compared using Student’s t-test, and the results showed:

  • p < 0.01, indicating that the cytotoxic effect of Dox-PLGA nanoparticles was significantly greater than that of

Formulation

IC?? (µg/mL)

Free Doxorubicin

7.4 ± 0.6

Dox-PLGA NPs

2.9 ± 0.3

  • free doxorubicin.

6.4 Interpretation

The enhanced cytotoxicity of Dox-PLGA NPs can be attributed to several factors:

  • Improved cellular uptake of nanoparticles through endocytosis.
  • Sustained intracellular release of doxorubicin from the PLGA matrix.
  • Enhanced drug accumulation within cancer cells due to prolonged exposure.

7. Stability Studies

Stability studies were conducted to evaluate the physicochemical stability of the optimized doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles under different storage conditions over 3 months. The formulations were stored in sealed amber glass vials at two temperature conditions:

  • Refrigerated (4?°C)
  • Room Temperature (25?°C)

Key parameters, including particle size and entrapment efficiency (EE%), were monitored at the end of the study period to assess the integrity and retention characteristics of the nanoparticle formulation.

7.1 Results of Stability Evaluation

Parameter

Initial

After 3 Months @ 25?°C

After 3 Months @ 4?°C

Particle Size (nm)

158.6

173.4

160.8

Entrapment Efficiency (%)

78.4

71.2

76.5

7.2 Interpretation

  • Particle Size: An increase in particle size was observed at 25?°C, indicating potential aggregation or surface adsorption, likely due to increased molecular mobility and reduced polymer rigidity at higher temperatures.
  • Entrapment Efficiency: A noticeable decline in EE% was seen at room temperature, possibly due to drug leakage or degradation, whereas storage at 4?°C maintained better drug retention.

8. RESULT

The present study successfully developed and optimized doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles using the nanoprecipitation technique. The outcomes from formulation, optimization, characterization, release kinetics, cytotoxicity, and stability studies are summarized below:

8.1 Nanoparticle Formulation and Optimization

  • Nanoparticles were prepared using a drug:polymer ratio of 1:5, 10 mL acetone as organic solvent, and 20 mL of 1% PVA as the aqueous stabilizing phase.
  • Box-Behnken Design (BBD) was used to optimize formulation variables (PLGA %, PVA %, and stirring speed).
  • Optimal conditions: PLGA 1%, PVA 1%, and stirring speed 1200 rpm.
  • Model F-value: 26.37 (p < 0.0001)
  • Lack of Fit: Non-significant (p = 0.2391)
  • = 0.9732, Adjusted R² = 0.9567

8.2 Characterization of Optimized Nanoparticles

  • Mean Particle Size: 158.6 ± 3.4 nm
  • Polydispersity Index (PDI): 0.179 (indicating narrow size distribution)
  • Zeta Potential: –21.3 ± 1.8 mV (good stability)
  • Entrapment Efficiency (EE%): 78.4 ± 2.1%
  • Morphology (SEM & TEM): Smooth, spherical, non-aggregated particles

8.3 In Vitro Drug Release

  • The nanoparticles exhibited a biphasic drug release pattern:
    • Burst release: 21.7% in the first 4 hours
    • Sustained release: Up to 91.6 ± 3.1% over 72 hours
  • Release kinetics:
    • First-order model: Best fit (R² = 0.9812)
    • Higuchi model: R² = 0.9543

8.4 Cytotoxicity (MTT Assay)

  • Cell Line: MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
  • IC?? (Free Doxorubicin): 7.4 ± 0.6 µg/mL
  • IC?? (Dox-PLGA NPs): 2.9 ± 0.3 µg/mL
  • Statistical significance: p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test)
  • The nanoparticle formulation demonstrated significantly enhanced cytotoxicity, likely due to improved cellular uptake and sustained intracellular drug release.

8.5 Stability Study

  • Storage conditions: 4°C and 25°C for 3 months
  • Particle Size increased from 158.6 nm to 173.4 nm at 25°C; remained relatively stable (160.8 nm) at 4°C
  • Entrapment Efficiency decreased to 71.2% at 25°C but was retained at 76.5% at 4°C
  • Conclusion: Better stability at 4°C in terms of particle integrity and drug retention

CONCLUSION

In this study, doxorubicin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles were successfully formulated using the nanoprecipitation technique and optimized via Box-Behnken Design (BBD). The optimized nanoparticles demonstrated ideal physicochemical characteristics, including a mean particle size of 158.6 nm, narrow PDI (0.179), and a stable zeta potential of –21.3 mV, along with a high entrapment efficiency of 78.4%.

The in vitro drug release profile revealed a desirable biphasic pattern, with an initial burst followed by sustained release over 72 hours, following first-order kinetics (R² = 0.9812). The MTT cytotoxicity assay against MCF-7 breast cancer cells confirmed significantly enhanced anticancer activity of the nanoparticle formulation (IC?? = 2.9 µg/mL) compared to free doxorubicin (IC?? = 7.4 µg/mL, p < 0.01).

Furthermore, stability studies indicated that the formulation was more stable at 4°C than at room temperature, retaining both particle size integrity and drug content over three months. Overall, these findings support the potential of PLGA-based nanoparticles as an efficient, targeted, and controlled-release delivery system for doxorubicin in cancer therapy, with the added benefits of reduced toxicity and enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

REFERENCES

  1. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. "Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier." Polymers, 2011.
  2. Prabaharan M. "Review on PLGA-based nanoparticles for drug delivery." J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2015.
  3. “Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy” – demonstrated CpG + DOX PLGA NPs efficacy in lymphoma & melanoma Wikipedia+2ScienceDirect+2arXiv+2clinicsinoncology.comPMC+15PMC+15ResearchGate+15American Chemical Society Publications+2Semantic Scholar+2ScienceDirect+2arXiv+2ResearchGate+2PMC+2Scholars Research Library+7MDPI+7PMC+7
  4. Zhou et?al. “Doxorubicin loaded PLGA NPs with layer-by-layer coatings” – detailed release kinetics and burst reduction PMC
  5. Madhuri Sharon et?al., “pH Dependent Encapsulation of Doxorubicin in PLGA” (Annals of Biological Research, 2012) Scholars Research Library
  6. Pieper et?al., “Incorporation of doxorubicin in different polymer nanoparticles” (Beilstein J Nanotechnol, 2019) Nature+13Semantic Scholar+13Scholars Research Library+13
  7. “Photochemical responsive nanoparticle for DOX/CUR co delivery” (PMC?PMC9209492) PMC
  8. “Encapsulation of Doxorubicin in PLGA enhances cancer therapy” (Clin Oncol, 2016) PMC+2clinicsinoncology.com+2clinicsinoncology.com+2
  9. “Doxorubicin verapamil dual loaded PLGA nanoparticles” for MCF 7 cytotoxicity Frontiers+15ScienceDirect+15ResearchGate+15
  10. “PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles for improved DOX delivery” (SciDirect, 2009) ScienceDirect+3ScienceDirect+3PMC+3
  11. “DOX + resveratrol co delivery PLGA NPs overcoming resistance” (Nature Sci Rep) Nature
  12. “DOX Loaded PLGA NP with cationic/anionic layers” (MDPI Polymers, 2021) MDPI
  13. “First order kinetics release from PLGA NPs” (ResearchGate dataset) ResearchGate
  14. Review: “PLGA Based Nanoparticles in Cancer Treatment” (Frontiers 2018) Frontiers
  15. “Novel hydrophilic copolymer nanoparticle enhances DOX efficacy in MCF 7” (ACS Omega) Frontiers+15American Chemical Society Publications+15PMC+15
  16. “Development of PLGA DOX loaded NPs using Box Behnken design” (ResearchGate, 2023) PMC+4ResearchGate+4PMC+4
  17. PLOS ONE: “Efficient chemotherapy of rat glioblastoma using Dox Lecithin PLGA/HSA NPs” PLOS
  18. Serafin et al., “Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Molecular Weight Effect on Release & ICD.” Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. (2022) Astrophysics Data System+15ScienceDirect+15ResearchGate+15ResearchGate+9ScienceDirect+9PMC+9
  19. Dwivedi et al., “Sustained and Long Term Release of Doxorubicin from PLGA NPs Inducing Immunogenic Cell Death.” Pharmaceutics 14 (2022) MDPI
  20. Akkol et al., “Incorporation of Doxorubicin in Different Polymer Nanoparticles and Effect of Preparation Method.” Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. (2019) Beilstein Journals+1BioRxiv+1
  21. Sheikh et al., “Formulation and Optimization of DOX PLGA NPs Using Box–Behnken: Ex Vivo Stability & In Vitro Activity.” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 100 (2017) ScienceDirect+15PubMed+15ScienceDirect+15
  22. Li et al., “Formulation & Process Optimization of Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA NPs: In Vitro Release.” Yao Xue Xue Bao (2013) ScienceDirect+3PubMed+3Beilstein Journals+3
  23. Chakraborty et al., “Box–Behnken?Design Applied to HPLC of DOX PLGA NPs.” Analytical Sci. JSSC (2022)
  24. Mateus et al., “Impact of PEG Content on DOX Release from PLGA co PEG NPs.” Astrophys. Data Syst. (2024) ResearchGate+11Astrophysics Data System+11MDPI+11
  25. Zhou et al., “Controlled Release of DOX from Poly(D,L lactide co glycolide).” Int. J. Pharm. (2024) ScienceDirect+1ResearchGate+1
  26. Box & Behnken, “Some New Three Level Designs for Study of Quantitative Variables.” Technometrics (1960) ScienceDirect+7Wikipedia+7analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com+7
  27. J. R. Karmoker et al., “Development & Optimization of Mucoadhesive Microspheres by Box–Behnken.” Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. Wikipedia
  28. Sankha Bhattacharya, “Methotrexate Loaded Polymeric Lipid Hybrid NPs: Box–Behnken Optimization.” (2021) ResearchGate
  29. ACS Omega, “Paclitaxel & Curcumin Co Loaded PLGA NPs via Box–Behnken.” (2022) American Chemical Society Publications
  30. Clinics in Oncology, “Encapsulation of Doxorubicin in PLGA NPs Enhances Cancer Therapy: Stability & Release.” (2016) MDPI+12clinicsinoncology.com+12Beilstein Journals+12
  31. PubMed PMC, “Dox PLGA7K vs DOX PLGA12K: Release Kinetics & Stability.” (2020) PubMed+1PMC+1
  32. Zhang et al., “PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Clinical Pharmacokinetics & Stability Review.” Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma (2008)
  33. Preclinical study: DOX PLGA NPs show enhanced potency vs MCF 7. Front. Pharmacol. (2018)
  34. Catalano, “Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide NPs Conjugated with Dox for Breast Cancer.” arXiv preprint (2019) arxiv.org
  35. Sanson et al., “Magnetic Polymersomes Co Encapsulating DOX & MNPs.” arXiv preprint (2012) arxiv.org
  36. Guo et al. & Liang et al., “Magnetic NPs in Drug Delivery & DOX Conjugates.” Int. J. Nanomedicine (2016)
  37. Wikipedia: Magnetic Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery overview (2025) Wikipedia
  38. Wikipedia: Stimuli Responsive DDS overview (2025) Scilit+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3
  39. Wikipedia: pH Responsive Tumor Targeted DDS (2025) Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+7
  40. Tu et al., “Ultrasound Triggered Drug Delivery with Dox nanodroplets.” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2016) Wikipedia
  41. Pontrelli et al., “Mathematical Modelling of Drug Delivery from pH Responsive Nanocontainers.” arXiv (2019) arxiv.org
  42. Exploration journal, “Ultrasound controlled Drug Release & Activation for Cancer Therapy.” (2021) PMC+15Wikipedia+15clinicsinoncology.com+15
  43. Barenholz, “Doxil – the First FDA Approved Nano Drug: Lessons Learned.” J. Control. Release (2012) Wikipedia
  44. Abramoff et al., “Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Kaposi’s Sarcoma.” Int. J. Nanomedicine (2007) Beilstein Journals+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2
  45. McChesney & Ewer, “Cardiac Safety of Liposomal Anthracyclines.” Cardiovasc. Toxicol. (2007) Wikipedia
  46. Fang & Xie, “EPR Effect for Macromolecular Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors.” Adv. Drug Del. Rev. (2013) Wikipedia
  47. Lee et al., “Improving Therapeutic Index of Anthracycline Chemotherapy.” Breast (2009) Wikipedia
  48. Zhang et al., “Dextran Doxorubicin Prodrug pH Sensitive DDS.” Asian J. Pharm. Sci. (2020) Wikipedia
  49. Song et al., “Schiff Linked PEGylated DOX Prodrug Nanoparticles.” Front. Oncol. (2021) Wikipedia
  50. Huang et al., “Novel Alginate Stabilized DOX Nanodroplets for Ultrasound Theranosis.” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2016) Wikipedia
  51. Pontrelli et al., “Drug Transport Mathematical Modelling in Nanocontainers.” arXiv (2019) arxiv.org
  52. Karmoker et al., stats used in Box Behnken optimization ScienceDirect+7Wikipedia+7analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com+7
  53. Bhattacharya et al., “PLGA Lipid Hybrid NPs for Glioblastoma.” (2021) ScienceDirect+2ResearchGate+2Astrophysics Data System+2
  54. ACS Omega, “Paclitaxel + Curcumin Co Loaded PLGA NPs.” (2022) PubMed
  55. Mateus et al., “PEG Content Effect on DOX Release.” (2024) MDPI+5Astrophysics Data System+5ScienceDirect+5
  56. Serafin et al., “PLGA NPs Molecular Weight on Immunogenic Cell Death.” ScienceDirect+2ScienceDirect+2MDP

Reference

  1. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. "Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier." Polymers, 2011.
  2. Prabaharan M. "Review on PLGA-based nanoparticles for drug delivery." J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2015.
  3. “Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy” – demonstrated CpG + DOX PLGA NPs efficacy in lymphoma & melanoma Wikipedia+2ScienceDirect+2arXiv+2clinicsinoncology.comPMC+15PMC+15ResearchGate+15American Chemical Society Publications+2Semantic Scholar+2ScienceDirect+2arXiv+2ResearchGate+2PMC+2Scholars Research Library+7MDPI+7PMC+7
  4. Zhou et?al. “Doxorubicin loaded PLGA NPs with layer-by-layer coatings” – detailed release kinetics and burst reduction PMC
  5. Madhuri Sharon et?al., “pH Dependent Encapsulation of Doxorubicin in PLGA” (Annals of Biological Research, 2012) Scholars Research Library
  6. Pieper et?al., “Incorporation of doxorubicin in different polymer nanoparticles” (Beilstein J Nanotechnol, 2019) Nature+13Semantic Scholar+13Scholars Research Library+13
  7. “Photochemical responsive nanoparticle for DOX/CUR co delivery” (PMC?PMC9209492) PMC
  8. “Encapsulation of Doxorubicin in PLGA enhances cancer therapy” (Clin Oncol, 2016) PMC+2clinicsinoncology.com+2clinicsinoncology.com+2
  9. “Doxorubicin verapamil dual loaded PLGA nanoparticles” for MCF 7 cytotoxicity Frontiers+15ScienceDirect+15ResearchGate+15
  10. “PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles for improved DOX delivery” (SciDirect, 2009) ScienceDirect+3ScienceDirect+3PMC+3
  11. “DOX + resveratrol co delivery PLGA NPs overcoming resistance” (Nature Sci Rep) Nature
  12. “DOX Loaded PLGA NP with cationic/anionic layers” (MDPI Polymers, 2021) MDPI
  13. “First order kinetics release from PLGA NPs” (ResearchGate dataset) ResearchGate
  14. Review: “PLGA Based Nanoparticles in Cancer Treatment” (Frontiers 2018) Frontiers
  15. “Novel hydrophilic copolymer nanoparticle enhances DOX efficacy in MCF 7” (ACS Omega) Frontiers+15American Chemical Society Publications+15PMC+15
  16. “Development of PLGA DOX loaded NPs using Box Behnken design” (ResearchGate, 2023) PMC+4ResearchGate+4PMC+4
  17. PLOS ONE: “Efficient chemotherapy of rat glioblastoma using Dox Lecithin PLGA/HSA NPs” PLOS
  18. Serafin et al., “Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Molecular Weight Effect on Release & ICD.” Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. (2022) Astrophysics Data System+15ScienceDirect+15ResearchGate+15ResearchGate+9ScienceDirect+9PMC+9
  19. Dwivedi et al., “Sustained and Long Term Release of Doxorubicin from PLGA NPs Inducing Immunogenic Cell Death.” Pharmaceutics 14 (2022) MDPI
  20. Akkol et al., “Incorporation of Doxorubicin in Different Polymer Nanoparticles and Effect of Preparation Method.” Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. (2019) Beilstein Journals+1BioRxiv+1
  21. Sheikh et al., “Formulation and Optimization of DOX PLGA NPs Using Box–Behnken: Ex Vivo Stability & In Vitro Activity.” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 100 (2017) ScienceDirect+15PubMed+15ScienceDirect+15
  22. Li et al., “Formulation & Process Optimization of Doxorubicin Loaded PLGA NPs: In Vitro Release.” Yao Xue Xue Bao (2013) ScienceDirect+3PubMed+3Beilstein Journals+3
  23. Chakraborty et al., “Box–Behnken?Design Applied to HPLC of DOX PLGA NPs.” Analytical Sci. JSSC (2022)
  24. Mateus et al., “Impact of PEG Content on DOX Release from PLGA co PEG NPs.” Astrophys. Data Syst. (2024) ResearchGate+11Astrophysics Data System+11MDPI+11
  25. Zhou et al., “Controlled Release of DOX from Poly(D,L lactide co glycolide).” Int. J. Pharm. (2024) ScienceDirect+1ResearchGate+1
  26. Box & Behnken, “Some New Three Level Designs for Study of Quantitative Variables.” Technometrics (1960) ScienceDirect+7Wikipedia+7analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com+7
  27. J. R. Karmoker et al., “Development & Optimization of Mucoadhesive Microspheres by Box–Behnken.” Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. Wikipedia
  28. Sankha Bhattacharya, “Methotrexate Loaded Polymeric Lipid Hybrid NPs: Box–Behnken Optimization.” (2021) ResearchGate
  29. ACS Omega, “Paclitaxel & Curcumin Co Loaded PLGA NPs via Box–Behnken.” (2022) American Chemical Society Publications
  30. Clinics in Oncology, “Encapsulation of Doxorubicin in PLGA NPs Enhances Cancer Therapy: Stability & Release.” (2016) MDPI+12clinicsinoncology.com+12Beilstein Journals+12
  31. PubMed PMC, “Dox PLGA7K vs DOX PLGA12K: Release Kinetics & Stability.” (2020) PubMed+1PMC+1
  32. Zhang et al., “PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Clinical Pharmacokinetics & Stability Review.” Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma (2008)
  33. Preclinical study: DOX PLGA NPs show enhanced potency vs MCF 7. Front. Pharmacol. (2018)
  34. Catalano, “Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide NPs Conjugated with Dox for Breast Cancer.” arXiv preprint (2019) arxiv.org
  35. Sanson et al., “Magnetic Polymersomes Co Encapsulating DOX & MNPs.” arXiv preprint (2012) arxiv.org
  36. Guo et al. & Liang et al., “Magnetic NPs in Drug Delivery & DOX Conjugates.” Int. J. Nanomedicine (2016)
  37. Wikipedia: Magnetic Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery overview (2025) Wikipedia
  38. Wikipedia: Stimuli Responsive DDS overview (2025) Scilit+3Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3
  39. Wikipedia: pH Responsive Tumor Targeted DDS (2025) Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+7
  40. Tu et al., “Ultrasound Triggered Drug Delivery with Dox nanodroplets.” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2016) Wikipedia
  41. Pontrelli et al., “Mathematical Modelling of Drug Delivery from pH Responsive Nanocontainers.” arXiv (2019) arxiv.org
  42. Exploration journal, “Ultrasound controlled Drug Release & Activation for Cancer Therapy.” (2021) PMC+15Wikipedia+15clinicsinoncology.com+15
  43. Barenholz, “Doxil – the First FDA Approved Nano Drug: Lessons Learned.” J. Control. Release (2012) Wikipedia
  44. Abramoff et al., “Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Kaposi’s Sarcoma.” Int. J. Nanomedicine (2007) Beilstein Journals+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2
  45. McChesney & Ewer, “Cardiac Safety of Liposomal Anthracyclines.” Cardiovasc. Toxicol. (2007) Wikipedia
  46. Fang & Xie, “EPR Effect for Macromolecular Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors.” Adv. Drug Del. Rev. (2013) Wikipedia
  47. Lee et al., “Improving Therapeutic Index of Anthracycline Chemotherapy.” Breast (2009) Wikipedia
  48. Zhang et al., “Dextran Doxorubicin Prodrug pH Sensitive DDS.” Asian J. Pharm. Sci. (2020) Wikipedia
  49. Song et al., “Schiff Linked PEGylated DOX Prodrug Nanoparticles.” Front. Oncol. (2021) Wikipedia
  50. Huang et al., “Novel Alginate Stabilized DOX Nanodroplets for Ultrasound Theranosis.” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2016) Wikipedia
  51. Pontrelli et al., “Drug Transport Mathematical Modelling in Nanocontainers.” arXiv (2019) arxiv.org
  52. Karmoker et al., stats used in Box Behnken optimization ScienceDirect+7Wikipedia+7analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com+7
  53. Bhattacharya et al., “PLGA Lipid Hybrid NPs for Glioblastoma.” (2021) ScienceDirect+2ResearchGate+2Astrophysics Data System+2
  54. ACS Omega, “Paclitaxel + Curcumin Co Loaded PLGA NPs.” (2022) PubMed
  55. Mateus et al., “PEG Content Effect on DOX Release.” (2024) MDPI+5Astrophysics Data System+5ScienceDirect+5
  56. Serafin et al., “PLGA NPs Molecular Weight on Immunogenic Cell Death.” ScienceDirect+2ScienceDirect+2MDP

Photo
Siddhi Khanolkar
Corresponding author

Yashwantrao Bhonsale College Of Pharmacy ,Sawantwadi ,Sindhudurga, Maharashtra

Photo
Rahul Waman
Co-author

Vamanrao Ithape Pharmacy College, Sangamner.

Photo
Revati Mole
Co-author

Sahyadri College of pharmacy methawade

Photo
Madhuri Jagtap
Co-author

Rupesh badhan institute of pharmacy pimpalner

Photo
Asha Chopde
Co-author

Madhav university pindwara (Sirohi) Rajasthan

Photo
Babu Anmulwad
Co-author

Madhav University pindwara (Sirohi) Rajasthan

Siddhi Khanolkar, Rahul Waman, Revati Mole, Madhuri Jagtap, Asha Chopde, Babu Anmulwad, Formulation and Characterization of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Targeted Cancer Therapy, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 7, 3187-3197. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16359055

More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Lip Gloss By ...
Deepa Chandrawanshi, Komal Harinkhede, Khushi Turkar, Khushiya Pa...
Development And Validation of UV Spectroscopic Met...
Kalyani Peluri, Ambika S., Pallavi K. C., Ruchitha M., Tejaswini ...
Analyzing Antihypertensive Drugs Floating Times fo...
Dr. Rama Rao Vadapalli, Darisi Saketh, Gangolu Yohan, Gurram Loke...
Innovative Approaches in Levodopa Nasal Spray Formulation: A Review on Excipient...
Devendra Sonawane, Rutik Liddad, Pravin Waghmode, Rushikesh Nikam, Pachpute D. S., ...
Related Articles
A Review On Development And Validation Of Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatograph...
Kanchan Shinde, Neha Gaikwad, Varsha Pangale, Charushila Bhangale, ...
Liposomal Gel Of Ciprofloxacin For Better Treatment Of Periodontal Disease...
Ekta Malik , Shubhangi Nema , Bharti Choudhary , Nazneen Dubey, ...
Comparative Study of Regulatory Requirements for Drug Approval (USFDA vs. EMA vs...
Parth Killedar, Tanuja Khopade, Siddhi Kurhade, Shubhangi Khemnar , Nutan Kokare, S. D. Mankar, ...
Design, Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Novel Pyrimidine Derivatives...
Avinash Patil, Prashant Chavan, Amitkumar Rawal, Kiran Patil, ...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Lip Gloss By Using Dacus Carota And Crocus ...
Deepa Chandrawanshi, Komal Harinkhede, Khushi Turkar, Khushiya Patle, Harsha Katre, Alka Bisen, ...
More related articles
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Lip Gloss By Using Dacus Carota And Crocus ...
Deepa Chandrawanshi, Komal Harinkhede, Khushi Turkar, Khushiya Patle, Harsha Katre, Alka Bisen, ...
Development And Validation of UV Spectroscopic Method for Estimation of Calcium ...
Kalyani Peluri, Ambika S., Pallavi K. C., Ruchitha M., Tejaswini V., ...
Analyzing Antihypertensive Drugs Floating Times for Efficiency Evaluation: A Rev...
Dr. Rama Rao Vadapalli, Darisi Saketh, Gangolu Yohan, Gurram Lokeswari, Bodapati Meghana, Jayanth Ka...
Formulation And Evaluation Of Herbal Lip Gloss By Using Dacus Carota And Crocus ...
Deepa Chandrawanshi, Komal Harinkhede, Khushi Turkar, Khushiya Patle, Harsha Katre, Alka Bisen, ...
Development And Validation of UV Spectroscopic Method for Estimation of Calcium ...
Kalyani Peluri, Ambika S., Pallavi K. C., Ruchitha M., Tejaswini V., ...
Analyzing Antihypertensive Drugs Floating Times for Efficiency Evaluation: A Rev...
Dr. Rama Rao Vadapalli, Darisi Saketh, Gangolu Yohan, Gurram Lokeswari, Bodapati Meghana, Jayanth Ka...