D. K. Patil Institute of Pharmacy, Loha.
The personal hygiene awareness are increasing in the people now days for better healthy life. But the adverse effects of synthetic chemicals are shown in the formulations. The formulated polyherbal handwash was evaluated for various physicochemical and quality control parameters, including pH, viscosity, foaming ability, spreadability, and stability. Phytochemical screening was performed to confirm the presence of bioactive constituents such as flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and essential oils. Microbial evaluation, including antibacterial activity against common pathogens, was also carried out to assess its efficacy. Hand washing is an extremely significant precaution. Hand hygiene is the single most important simplest and least expensive mean of preventing nasocomial infection. The present study focuses on the formulation and evaluation of a polyherbal handwash using medicinal plant extracts known for their antimicrobial and skin-protective properties.The results demonstrated that the formulated handwash possessed acceptable physicochemical properties, good foaming capacity, and stability over a defined period. The presence of active phytoconstituents contributed to significant antimicrobial activity, indicating its effectiveness in maintaining hand hygiene.
The herbal medicine is also known as botanical treatment or phyto-medicine herbal medication refers to the uses of any plant seeds, root, leaves, bark, flower and aerial part for medicinal purpose. Herbal medicine have been the treatment and care of numerous disease. Skin being the most exposed part of our body requires protection from skin pathogen. To defend the skin from harmful micro-organism to avoid spreading disease. Hand washing is extremely significant precautions. Hand hygiene is the single most important simplest and least expensive mean of preventing nasocomial infection. Hand washing is main purpose of cleaning hands with removing soil,dirt ,pathogenic microorganisms and avoid transmitting of transient microorganisms. Hygiene is basically defined as the branch of science which is involved in knowledge and practice related to promotion of health.the concept highlights the need of maintaining Hygiene in prevention of disease. Spread of infection (bacterial or viral) can be prevented hygiene practices, an herbal drug treatment gives healthy life.(1)
Hand hygiene plays a vital role in preventing the spread of infections and maintaining overall health. Most commercial handwashes contain synthetic chemicals that may cause skin dryness and irritation on repeated use. To overcome these issues, the present study focuses on the formulation of a polyherbal handwash using natural ingredients such as Tulsi, Neem, Reetha, Beetroot, Glycerin, and salt .
Img. No. 1. : Herbal Handwash
Advantages :-
Disadvantage:-
1.2 PLANT PROFILE
1. TULSI :-
Synonym: Ocimum sanctum , Ocimum tenuiflorum
Biologycal Source : Tulsi consists of the dried leaves and flowering tops of Ocimum sanctum (also known as Ocimum tenuiflorum), belonging to the family Lamiaceae.
Figure No.2: Tulsi
Chemical Constituent :
Volatile oil
Caryophyllene
Flavonoids
Uses :
2. NEEM :-
Synonyms: Margosa Tree ,Nim , Azadirachta indica
Biological Source: Neem consists of the dried leaves, bark, seeds, and other parts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss., belonging to the family Meliaceae.
FIG. NO.3: NEEM
Chemical Constituents: Neem contains various bioactive compounds, mainly:
Uses :
Suitable for sensitive and acne-prone skin.
3. REETHA :
Synonyms: Soapnut, Soapberry Sapindus mukorossi.
FIG. NO.4: REETHA
Biological Source: Reetha consists of the dried fruits (pericarps) of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn., belonging to the family Sapindaceae.
Chemical Constituents: Reetha mainly contains:
Uses:-
4. BEETROOT :-
Synonyms: Beet, Garden Beet, Table Beet, Beta vulgaris
Biological Source: Beetroot consists of the fresh or dried tuberous roots of Beta vulgaris L., belonging to the family Amaranthaceae.
Chemical Constituents: Beetroot contains:
FIGURE NO.3: BEETROOT
Uses
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:-
2.1 Apparatus :-
|
Ingredient |
Activity |
|
Tulsi |
Antimicrobial Agent |
|
Neem |
Antiseptic and antibacterial |
|
Reetha |
Foaming agent |
|
Beetroot |
Colouring agent , Antioxident |
|
Glycerin |
Moisturizing agent |
|
Sodiun Chloride |
Thickening Agent |
|
Rose water |
As a perfume |
|
Methyl paraben |
Preservative |
Preformulation study:
Pre formulation study is an important phase in the development of pharmaceutical products. It involves evaluating the characteristics of the drug substance and its compatibility with excipients before creating the final formulation.
2.3.1. BULK DENSITY:
The bulk density of a powder is the ratio of the mass of an untapped powder sample and its volume including the contribution of the inter-particulate void volume.
FORMULA:-
BULK DENSITY = MASS
BULK VOLUME
2.3.2.TAPPED DENSITY:
The tapped density is an increased bulk density attained after mechanically tapping a container containing the powder sample.
FORMULA:
TAPPED DENSITY = MASS
TAPPED VOLUME
2.3.3.CARR'S INDEX :-
Carr's Index of any solid is calculated for compressibility of a powder which is based on true density and bulk density.
FORMULA:
|
|
Tapped Density
2.3.4. HAUSNER'S RATIO:-
Hausner ratio is defined as the ratio of a powder's tapped bulk density to its poured (loose) bulk density
FORMULA:
HAUSNER'S RATIO = TAPPED DENSITY
BULK DENSITY
2.3.5. ANGLE OF REPOSE:-
Angle of repose powder poured from a vessel forms a cone-like pile. The angle of repose- the angle between the slope of the pile and the horizontal correlates with the strength of particle- particle interactions and, therefore, is measured to infer flowability.
FORMULA: ? = tan?¹(h/r)
Where,
h : the height in cm
r : the radius in cm
? : the angle of repose
2.3.6. % ASH VALUE:- residues such as phosphates, carbonates and silicates present in herbal drugs
Formula:
|
????100
|
????1
Where,
W2: weight of crucible ash
WO: weight of crucible
W1: weight of sample
2.4. Qualitative Test:-
2.4.1 Test for alkaloids:-
2.4.1.1. Dragendorff’s test:- To 1 ml of the extract, add 1 ml of dragendorff’s reagent (Potassium Bismuth iodide solution). An orange-red precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids.
2.4.2.2 Mayer’s test:- To 1 ml of the extract, add 1 ml of Mayer’s reagent (Potassium mercuric iodide solution). Whitish yellow or cream colored precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids.
2.4.2 Test for saponins:-
Take small quantity of alcoholic and aqueous extract separately and add 20 ml of distilled water and shake in a graduated cylinder for 15 minutes lengthwise. A 1cm layer of foam indicates the presence of saponins.
2.4.3 Test for Tannins:-
About 200 mg of the plant extract was boiled with 10 mL of distilled water; and 0.1% Ferric chloride was added to the mixture; which was then observed for blue-black coloration indicating the presence of tannins.
2.4.4. Test for Flavonoids :-
200 mg of the plant extract was mixed with 10 mL of ethanol and filtrated. Two mL of the filtrate, concentrated HCl, and magnesium ribbon were mixed. The formation of a pink or red color indicates the presence of flavonoids. Adding 1 mL of distilled water and NaOH to 0.5 mL of crude extract, the formation of a yellowish color indicated the presence of glycosides.
2.5. Methods :-
2.5.1 Extraction:- The process of separating medicinally active portions of plant and animal tissues from the inactive or inert components using selective solvents through standerd extraction process
Types of Extractions:- 1) Decoction 2) Percolation 3) Maceration 4) Solvent Extraction method
Prepration of Extract (Decoction Extraction):-
10 gm of each dry plant material (Neem ,Tulsi , Reetha , Beetroot ) were added in 100 ml of water .The mixture was heated on water bath at 30-50 min. and then filtered through filter paper to get the practical free extract .
Figure No.4: Figure No.5
2.5.2 Formulation of Hand Wash:-
Transfer the prepared herbal hand wash into clean, labeled containers.
2.6. Evaluation Parameter:-
2.6.1 pH :- The pH of the formulated hand wash is measured to ensure it is safe and compatible with skin. It is determined using a calibrated digital pH meter at room temperature. A small quantity of the hand wash is diluted with distilled water, and the electrode is immersed in the solution to record the pH. The ideal pH of a hand wash should be in the range of 5.5 to 7, which is suitable for maintaining skin integrity and avoiding irritation.
2.6.2. Viscosity :- Viscosity is the measure of the thickness and flow property of the hand wash formulation. It indicates how easily the liquid spreads and pours during use. Proper viscosity ensures good consistency, ease of application, and user acceptability. It is commonly measured using a viscometer (such as Brookfield viscometer) at controlled temperature. An ideal hand wash should have moderate viscosity—neither too thick nor too thin—for effective cleaning and handling.
6.3. Skin Irritation :- The formulated hand wash is applied on a small area of skin (usually forearm) and observed for redness, itching, or swelling.
The site is monitored for 24–48 hours to check any adverse reaction. Absence of irritation indicates the formulation is safe for skin use.
2.6.4. Organoleptic property :- Organoleptic evaluation of the hand wash involves assessing its physical appearance such as color (chocolaty) , clarity, and consistency. It also includes checking the odor/ fragrance for acceptability and pleasantness. Additionally, texture and feel during use (smoothness, foaming, and after-feel on skin) are evaluated .
2.6.5. Foam height :- Foam height is an evaluation parameter used to measure the foaming ability of the hand wash formulation. It is determined by shaking a fixed quantity of sample with water in a graduated cylinder and recording the height of foam produced. Higher foam height indicates better foaming capacity and consumer acceptability.
2.6.6. Spreadability :- It is the ability of the hand wash to spread easily on the skin surface with minimal effort. It ensures uniform distribution of the formulation during application. Good spreadability indicates proper consistency and better user acceptability.
Figure No.6 Viscocity Figure No.7 Spredability Figure No.8. Foamheight
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION :-
3.2 Preformulation Study :-
Table no 2: Preformulation table of Ocimum sanctum
|
Parameter |
A (Seive No. 80) |
B (Seive No.100) |
|
Bulk Density g/ml |
0.83 |
0.50 |
|
Tapped Density g/ml |
1.25 |
0.83 |
|
Carrs Index % |
65.15% |
59.41% |
|
Hausner’s ratio |
1.5 |
1.66 |
|
Angle of Repose |
36’5 |
32’8 |
Table no 2:Preformulation table of Sapindus mukorossi
|
Parameter |
A (Seive No. 80) |
B (Seive No.100) |
|
Bulk Density g/ml |
0.62 |
0.55 |
|
Tapped Density g/ml |
0.83 |
0.83 |
|
Carrs Index % |
73.86 % |
65.43% |
|
Hausner’s ratio |
1.33 |
1.5 |
|
Angle of Repose |
30’2 |
32’8 |
|
Ash Value |
18.8% |
14.1% |
Table no 3:Preformulation table of Beta vulgaris
|
Parameter |
A (Seive No. 80) |
B (Seive No.100) |
|
Bulk Density g/ml |
0.71 |
0.62 |
|
Tapped Density g/ml |
1.25 |
0.76 |
|
Carrs Index % |
55.5% |
80.81 % |
|
Hausner’s ratio |
1.67 |
1.22 |
|
Angle of Repose |
21.92 |
33.3 |
|
Ash Value |
40.2 % |
24% |
Table no 4.Preformulation table of Azadirachta indica
|
Parameter |
A (Seive No. 80) |
B (Seive No.100) |
|
Bulk Density g/ml |
0.69 |
0.55 |
|
Tapped Density g/ml |
1.25 |
0.71 |
|
Carrs Index % |
55.95 % |
22.53% |
|
Hausner’s ratio |
1.81 |
1.29 |
|
Angle of Repose |
31’7 |
31’3 |
|
Ash Value |
13.37 % |
29 % |
Figure No.9
Figure No.10
Figure No.11
3.3 Phytochemical test :-
Table no 5.Table for phytochemical test
|
Test |
Observation |
Result |
|
Alkaloid Test 1) Dragendroff’s Test |
Orange red colour was obtained |
Alkaloid was present |
|
2) Mayre’s Test |
Creamy white precipitate was formed |
Alkaloid was present |
|
3) Wagners Test |
Radish brown precipitate |
Alkaloid was present |
|
Flavonoid test Sample + few drop of NaOH, dilute HCI |
Yellow colour diapper |
Flavonoid was present |
|
Tannin Sample + Ferric Chloride 2% |
Blue-Black or Green Colour |
Tannin was present |
|
Saponin |
Foam is forming |
Saponin was present |
Figure No.12 Figure No.13
3.4. Formulation table
Table no 6. Formulation of Hand Wash
|
Ingredient |
Batch A |
Batch B |
Batch C |
|
Neem |
4ml |
4ml |
5ml |
|
Tulsi |
4ml |
4ml |
4ml |
|
Reetha |
5ml |
6ml |
5ml |
|
Beetroot |
2ml |
2ml |
2ml |
|
Glycerine |
6ml |
7ml |
6.5ml |
|
Sodium Chloride |
0.5 gm |
0.5gm |
0.5gm |
|
Water |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
|
Rose Water |
4ml |
4ml |
4ml |
|
Methyl Parabean |
0.5gm |
0.5gm |
0.5gm |
Figure No.14
Figure No.15
Table no 6. Table for evalution parameters
|
Sr no |
Evaluation Parameter |
observation |
|
1 |
colour |
Brown |
|
2 |
odour |
Delicate |
|
3 |
pH |
5.2 |
|
4 |
Foam height |
5 ml |
|
5 |
Foam retention |
stable |
|
6 |
Viscosity |
38.99 |
|
7 |
Skin irritation test |
No irritation |
4. CONCLUSION:-
The formulated polyherbal handwash containing neem, tulsi, reetha, and other ingredients showed good cleansing ability with acceptable pH, viscosity, and spreadability. It was found to be skin-friendly and effective due to its natural antimicrobial properties. Overall, the formulation can be considered safe, economical, and suitable for daily use.
REFERENCES
Sontakke Vinayak, Chavan Saiprasad, Sontakke Vaishnavi, Surnar Rameshwar, Taur Disha, Tidke Satyanarayane, Formulation Evaluation of Polyherbal Handwash, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 3778-3788. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19703718
10.5281/zenodo.19703718