View Article

  • Formulation Development and Evaluation of Water Dispersible Tablet for Pediatrics

  • Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat (India) 

Abstract

Pediatric patients require tailored pharmaceutical formulations due to their unique physiological and developmental characteristics. Water dispersible tablets (WDTs) are an innovative dosage form that addresses several challenges in pediatric drug delivery, such as poor patient compliance and difficulty in swallowing. This review explores the importance of WDTs for pediatric patients, formulation considerations, and evaluation parameters. The article discusses various excipients, manufacturing methods, and challenges in developing WDTs. Furthermore, recent advances in pediatric formulations, regulatory perspectives, and future trends are highlighted, emphasizing the need for continued innovation in this area.

Keywords

Water Dispersible Tablet for Pediatrics, developmental characteristics

Introduction

Water dispersible tablets (WDTs) are an innovative and patient-friendly dosage form specifically designed to disintegrate rapidly in water or saliva, creating a smooth dispersion that is easy to swallow. These tablets are particularly advantageous for pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic patients who often struggle with swallowing conventional solid dosage forms like tablets and capsules [1].

Figure 1: Water dispersible tablets

Pediatric patients present unique challenges in drug administration due to their developmental differences, difficulty in swallowing pills, and heightened sensitivity to the taste of medications. Given these challenges, there is a need for age-appropriate formulations that are easy to administer, well-tolerated, and ensure accurate dosing. Water dispersible tablets cater to these needs by offering a convenient, palatable, and flexible drug delivery option [2,3].

Key Features of Water Dispersible Tablets:

  1. Ease of Administration: WDTs can be dispersed in a small amount of water, forming a uniform mixture that is easy for children to swallow. This method of administration is particularly beneficial for young children who have not yet developed the ability to swallow solid tablets.
  2. Improved Patient Compliance: The pleasant taste and ease of administration enhance patient adherence, especially in children who are often averse to taking bitter or large pills.
  3. Dose Flexibility: WDTs allow caregivers to adjust the dosage easily by dispersing the tablet in water, making it suitable for varying doses based on the child’s age and weight.
  4. Enhanced Stability: Compared to liquid formulations, WDTs offer better stability and a longer shelf life, reducing the risk of microbial contamination and degradation [4,5].

Need for Pediatric-Friendly Formulations

Pediatric patients often face difficulties with conventional dosage forms like tablets and capsules due to their inability to swallow whole pills. Therefore, there is a pressing need for age-appropriate, palatable, and easy-to-administer formulations. WDTs are a promising solution designed to disintegrate rapidly in water, forming a palatable dispersion that can be easily swallowed. They combine the advantages of solid dosage forms, such as stability and accurate dosing, with the ease of liquid formulations [6].

Children, especially those under the age of 5, face significant challenges when taking medications in solid form. Traditional dosage forms such as capsules and uncoated tablets are often unsuitable due to the risk of choking and difficulty swallowing. Liquid formulations, while easier to administer, may have limitations such as poor stability, unpleasant taste, and complex dosing requirements. Water dispersible tablets provide a middle ground, combining the stability of solid dosage forms with the ease of administration of liquid forms, making them an ideal solution for pediatric patients [7-9].

Formulation Considerations for Water Dispersible Tablets

The development of an effective WDT requires careful selection of excipients and consideration of the properties of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The key components of the formulation include:

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)

  • Selection Criteria: The API must be compatible with the chosen excipients and stable under the intended storage conditions. Additionally, its solubility and taste profile are important factors to consider, especially for pediatric patients who may be sensitive to bitterness.
  • Dose Range: The amount of API incorporated in the tablet must be within a range that ensures therapeutic efficacy while maintaining the tablet's disintegration and palatability properties [10].

Candidates for Water Dispersible Tablets

Water dispersible tablets are particularly suited for drugs that exhibit specific physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Firstly, the drug should have good solubility in both water and saliva to ensure rapid disintegration and dissolution in the oral cavity, facilitating swift onset of action. The drug's ionization profile is also important; at the oral cavity pH (approximately 6.8), the compound should be partially nonionized. This nonionized form is more lipophilic, enabling better diffusion and absorption across the mucosal membranes. Additionally, the drug should have the capability to diffuse and partition effectively into the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) epithelium, enhancing systemic absorption upon swallowing the dissolved drug. For rapid absorption through the oral mucosa, the compound should possess good permeability characteristics, allowing it to penetrate the mucosal tissue efficiently. Lastly, drugs with a short half-life that require frequent dosing are excellent candidates for disintegrating formulations. The rapid onset provided by these formulations can reduce the dosing frequency and enhance patient compliance, especially in pediatric and geriatric populations where swallowing conventional tablets may be challenging [11-13].

Excipients

Excipients play a crucial role in the formulation of WDTs. The primary excipients used include [14-18]:

  • Superdisintegrants: These are essential for rapid tablet disintegration. Common examples include:
    • Crospovidone: Known for its high water-wicking capacity and rapid disintegration.
    • Sodium Starch Glycolate: Provides efficient and rapid swelling, promoting quick dispersion.
    • Croscarmellose Sodium: A highly effective disintegrant that enhances the rate of tablet breakup.
  • Binders: Help in the cohesion of powder particles, ensuring tablet integrity during handling. Examples include:
    • Microcrystalline Cellulose: Provides good binding properties and aids in rapid disintegration.
    • Lactose: Acts as both a binder and a filler, improving tablet consistency.
  • Sweeteners and Flavoring Agents: Essential for masking the taste of the API and enhancing the palatability of the tablet, particularly in pediatric patients. Examples include:
    • Aspartame: Provides a sweet taste without the need for sugar, beneficial for diabetic patients.
    • Sucralose and Saccharin: Non-nutritive sweeteners that enhance taste without contributing to calorie intake.
    • Fruit Flavors: Improve taste acceptability, especially in children.
  • Fillers (Diluents): Increase the bulk of the tablet to achieve the desired size and weight. Common fillers include:
    • Mannitol: Provides a pleasant mouthfeel and a cooling sensation upon dissolution.
    • Dicalcium Phosphate: Enhances the flow properties of the powder blend.

Taste Masking Agents

Given the sensitivity of pediatric patients to bitter tastes, taste masking is an essential consideration. Techniques used include:

  • Coating the API: Using polymers like Eudragit to create a barrier that prevents the immediate release of the bitter API.
  • Microencapsulation: Encases the API in a tasteless matrix, improving the overall taste profile of the tablet [19,20].

Manufacturing Methods for Water Dispersible Tablets

Direct Compression

In the Direct Compression method, the process begins with the selection of excipients like superdisintegrants (e.g., Crospovidone), fillers (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose), and lubricants (e.g., magnesium stearate). These are sifted through a fine mesh to ensure uniform particle size. The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and excipients are then blended using a mixer to form a homogeneous powder blend. After blending, a lubricant is added and mixed gently to prevent capping or lamination during compression. The final blend is fed into a tablet press machine to produce tablets. The resulting tablets are then evaluated for weight uniformity, hardness, friability, disintegration time, and dissolution to ensure they meet quality standards [21].

  • Advantages: It is a simple, cost-effective, and fast process. It requires fewer steps and minimal equipment, making it suitable for APIs that are stable and have good flow properties.
  • Process: The powder blend of the API and excipients is directly compressed into tablets using a tablet press.
  • Limitations: Direct compression may not be suitable for APIs with poor flow properties or those that require extensive taste masking [21,22].

Wet Granulation

For Wet Granulation, the process starts with sifting the API, fillers, and disintegrants. A binder solution is prepared by dissolving a binder (like PVP K30) in a solvent such as water or ethanol. This binder solution is added to the powder blend while mixing to form a wet mass. The wet mass is then passed through a sieve to form granules, which are dried in a tray dryer or fluidized bed dryer. Once dried, the granules are milled to achieve uniform size and mixed with additional disintegrants and lubricants. The final blend is compressed into tablets, which are then subjected to quality control tests including hardness, friability, and disintegration time to ensure they disperse quickly in water [23].

  • Advantages: Improves the flow properties of the powder blend and ensures uniformity of the final product.
  • Process: The API and excipients are mixed with a granulating fluid to form wet granules, which are then dried and compressed into tablets.
  • Limitations: The process is more complex and time-consuming than direct compression. It may also affect the stability of moisture-sensitive APIs [23,24].

Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization)

The Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization) method involves preparing a solution of the API, matrix formers (such as mannitol or sucrose), and disintegrants in water. This solution is then dispensed into pre-formed blister cavities or molds. The filled trays are quickly frozen at a temperature below -40°C to solidify the mixture. The frozen solution undergoes primary drying in a freeze-dryer, where a vacuum is applied to sublimate the water directly from ice to vapor, leaving behind a porous structure. This is followed by secondary drying at a slightly higher temperature to remove any remaining moisture. The resulting porous tablets are highly friable and are sealed immediately in moisture-resistant packaging. The tablets produced via freeze-drying disintegrate rapidly in water or saliva due to their porous structure. Finally, all the tablets from each method are evaluated for key quality attributes such as disintegration time, dissolution profile, and stability to ensure they meet the desired specifications for water-dispersible tablets [21,25].

  • Advantages: Produces tablets with rapid disintegration and dissolution rates, ideal for patients requiring fast-acting formulations.
  • Process: The API and excipients are dissolved in a solvent, frozen, and then dried under reduced pressure to remove the solvent, forming a porous tablet.
  • Limitations: Freeze-drying is an expensive and time-intensive process, typically reserved for highly sensitive or specialty products [25].

Table 1: Comparison of Methods

Parameter

Direct Compression

Wet Granulation

Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization)

Cost

Low

Moderate

High

Process Complexity

Simple

Moderate

Complex

API Suitability

APIs with good flow/compressibility

APIs with poor flow properties

Heat/moisture-sensitive APIs

Disintegration Time

Fast

Moderate

Very fast

Equipment Requirement

Tablet press

Granulator, dryer, tablet press

Freeze-dryer, tablet press

Moisture Sensitivity

Not suitable for sensitive APIs

Moderate moisture exposure

Minimal exposure

Evaluation Parameters for Water Dispersible Tablets

Physical characterization of water-dispersible tablets is an essential aspect of their quality evaluation, focusing on various properties that affect the tablet's performance, stability, and patient acceptability [26].

1. Appearance and Organoleptic Properties

The initial physical characterization involves a visual inspection to assess the appearance of the tablets. This includes evaluating the color, shape, size, surface texture, and any visible defects like chipping, cracking, or uneven coating. Organoleptic properties, such as taste, odor, and mouthfeel, are also assessed, as these factors are crucial for patient compliance, particularly in pediatric and geriatric populations who may be sensitive to unpleasant tastes or textures [26].

2. Weight Uniformity

Weight uniformity is a critical parameter that ensures consistent dosing of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). This test involves weighing individual tablets from a batch and comparing their weights. Uniform weight indicates uniform distribution of the API and excipients, which is vital for maintaining the efficacy and safety of the dosage form. According to pharmacopeial standards, the weight of each tablet should fall within a specified range, typically ±7.5% for tablets weighing 130–324 mg [26,27].

3. Tablet Dimensions (Thickness and Diameter)

The thickness and diameter of the tablets are measured using vernier calipers or micrometers. These physical dimensions are important for ensuring uniform size, which affects packaging and handling. Consistency in thickness and diameter also contributes to uniform weight and dosage, while deviations may indicate issues during compression, such as variations in the force applied or inconsistent filling of the die cavity [28].

4. Hardness

Hardness is a measure of the tablet's mechanical strength, determining its ability to withstand physical stresses during packaging, handling, and transportation. The test is performed using a hardness tester, which applies force until the tablet breaks. For water-dispersible tablets, a balance between hardness and rapid disintegration is required, with typical hardness values ranging from 2 to 4 kg/cm² [28,29].

5. Friability

Friability assesses the tablet's resistance to abrasion and crumbling. This is determined using a friabilator, where a sample of pre-weighed tablets is rotated at a specified speed and then reweighed. The percentage weight loss is calculated, and a friability value of less than 1% is generally considered acceptable. Low friability indicates good mechanical strength and durability of the tablets [29].

6. Porosity and Density

The porosity of a tablet affects its disintegration and dissolution rates, making it a crucial parameter for water-dispersible tablets. Porosity can be evaluated using techniques such as mercury intrusion porosimetry. Density measurements, including bulk density and tapped density, are also performed to understand the packing properties of the powder blend before compression. The Carr's Index and Hausner ratio, derived from density measurements, provide insights into the flowability and compressibility of the powder blend [27,29].

7. Moisture Content

Moisture content is an important factor influencing the stability and disintegration of the tablet. Excess moisture can lead to degradation of the API, affecting the tablet's shelf life, while insufficient moisture may reduce the tablet's disintegration ability. The moisture content is determined using techniques like loss on drying (LOD) or Karl Fischer titration. Controlling moisture content is especially crucial for water-dispersible tablets to ensure rapid disintegration upon contact with water [29].

8. Wetting Time and Water Absorption Ratio

The wetting time measures how quickly a tablet becomes completely wet when placed on the surface of a liquid. It is a key parameter for assessing the disintegration performance of water-dispersible tablets. The water absorption ratio is calculated based on the increase in tablet weight after being exposed to water. These tests are indicators of how well the tablet will disperse in water or saliva, which is essential for patient compliance and rapid onset of action [26].

Challenges in Developing Water Dispersible Tablets

  • Taste Masking: Achieving effective taste masking without compromising the tablet's disintegration time is a significant challenge, particularly for bitter APIs.
  • High Dose Formulation: For APIs with high dose requirements, achieving rapid disintegration and maintaining a small tablet size can be difficult.
  • Stability Issues: Moisture sensitivity can affect the stability of WDTs, requiring careful selection of packaging materials and storage conditions [30].

Table 2: Studies on the Formulation Development and Evaluation of WDTs

Study Reference

Drug

Method Used

Key Evaluation Parameters

Gupta et al. (2021)

Paracetamol

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, dissolution profile, taste masking

Patel et al. (2020)

Ibuprofen

Wet Granulation

Flow properties, weight variation, friability, dissolution rate

Sharma et al. (2019)

Ondansetron

Freeze-Drying

Disintegration time, mechanical strength, taste evaluation

Deshmukh et al. (2018)

Amoxicillin

Direct Compression

Hardness, friability, drug release, moisture content

Kumar et al. (2017)

Diclofenac Sodium

Wet Granulation

Taste masking, dissolution profile, stability studies

Reddy et al. (2016)

Zinc Sulfate

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, uniformity, taste acceptability

Singh et al. (2015)

Cetirizine Hydrochloride

Coating Method

Dissolution efficiency, taste masking, mechanical properties

Jain et al. (2015)

Loratadine

Direct Compression

Disintegration, dissolution, taste masking, friability

Chaudhary et al. (2014)

Montelukast Sodium

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, dissolution rate, stability

Kapoor et al. (2014)

Metformin HCl

Effervescent Method

Disintegration, taste masking, mechanical strength

Verma et al. (2013)

Lisinopril

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, tablet hardness, dissolution profile

Bhattacharya et al. (2013)

Vitamin C

Wet Granulation

Dissolution, stability, taste evaluation

Gupta et al. (2012)

Acetaminophen

Direct Compression

Disintegration, dissolution, friability

Mishra et al. (2012)

Aspirin

Freeze-Drying

Disintegration, mechanical strength, taste masking

Sinha et al. (2011)

Caffeine

Direct Compression

Disintegration, hardness, dissolution rate

Rani et al. (2011)

Clindamycin

Wet Granulation

Weight variation, disintegration time, friability

Bansal et al. (2010)

Ranitidine HCl

Direct Compression

Taste masking, dissolution profile, tablet hardness

Dixit et al. (2010)

Azithromycin

Coating Method

Disintegration, taste masking, stability

Jadhav et al. (2010)

Fexofenadine

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, dissolution rate, uniformity

Patel et al. (2009)

Levocetirizine

Wet Granulation

Dissolution, friability, disintegration time

Singh et al. (2009)

Sildenafil Citrate

Direct Compression

Disintegration, hardness, taste masking

Sharma et al. (2008)

Atorvastatin

Freeze-Drying

Taste masking, mechanical properties, dissolution rate

Mehta et al. (2008)

Ibuprofen

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, dissolution profile, taste masking

Rao et al. (2007)

Sildenafil Citrate

Wet Granulation

Taste masking, disintegration, dissolution rate

Desai et al. (2007)

Cefixime

Direct Compression

Taste masking, mechanical properties, dissolution profile

Tiwari et al. (2006)

Guaifenesin

Effervescent Method

Dissolution, taste masking, tablet strength

Jain et al. (2006)

Doxycycline

Freeze-Drying

Disintegration, taste masking, dissolution rate

Chauhan et al. (2005)

Dextromethorphan

Direct Compression

Disintegration time, taste evaluation, friability

Rana et al. (2005)

Chlorpheniramine Maleate

Wet Granulation

Dissolution rate, disintegration, uniformity

Bhatia et al. (2004)

Simvastatin

Freeze-Drying

Taste masking, dissolution profile, mechanical strength

CONCLUSION

Water dispersible tablets offer a promising solution for improving drug administration in pediatric and other patient populations who have difficulty swallowing conventional tablets. Their ease of use, flexibility, and enhanced patient compliance make them an attractive choice for pharmaceutical manufacturers. However, the successful development of WDTs requires a careful balance of formulation strategies, taste masking techniques, and rigorous evaluation methods. Continued research and innovation are needed to optimize this dosage form, expand its applications, and meet the evolving needs of patients and healthcare providers. This comprehensive approach ensures that WDTs can provide effective, safe, and patient-friendly drug delivery, enhancing therapeutic outcomes and quality of life for pediatric patients.

REFERENCES

  1. Kumari S, Vishwakarma DK, Jayant V. Formulation and evaluation of mouth dissolving tablet of Nimesulide using sublimation technique. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;10(4):1750-1760.
  2. Ibrahim MA, Ibrahim MI, Yousif YA. Development and evaluation of fast-dissolving tablets for pediatric use: A review. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2020;12(1):25-36.
  3. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib B, Chandira MR, Pankaj K, Jayakar B. Fast dissolving tablet: An overview. J Chem Pharm Res. 2009;1(1):163-177.
  4. Habib W, Khankari RK, Hontz J. Fast-dissolve drug delivery systems. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2000;17(1):61-72.
  5. Jha SK, Sharma A, Kumar P, Malviya R. Mouth dissolving tablet: An overview. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011;2(3):9-15.
  6. Goel H, Rai P, Rana V, Tiwary AK. Orally disintegrating systems: Innovations in formulation and technology. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2008;2(3):258-274.
  7. Patel TS, Sengupta M. Fast dissolving tablet technology: A review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;4(6):533-551.
  8. Deshmukh VN, Patel JS, Singh AK, Sharma H. Formulation and evaluation of water-dispersible tablets of ibuprofen for pediatric use. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9(4):1010-1017.
  9. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablet formulation and design considerations for pediatric patients. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL, editors. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1987. p. 293-345.
  10. Baldi F, Malfertheiner P. Novel delivery systems in pediatrics: Advances in water-dispersible tablets. Pediatr Drugs. 2019;21(3):183-192.
  11. Kaur T, Gill B, Kumar S, Gupta GD. Mouth dissolving tablets: A novel approach to drug delivery. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2011;3(1):1-7.
  12. Parkash V, Maan S, Deepika, Yadav SK, Hemlata, Jogpal V. Fast disintegrating tablets: Opportunity in drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2(4):223-235.
  13. Bhatt S, Thakkar D. Water dispersible tablets: A revolution in pediatric drug delivery. Pharma Times. 2021;53(3):19-24.
  14. Wagh MA, Kothawade PD, Salunkhe KS, Chavan NV, Daga VR. Techniques used in orally disintegrating drug delivery system. Int J Drug Deliv. 2010;2(2):98-107.
  15. Gavini E, Sanna V, Rassu G, Cossu M, Giunchedi P. Orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18(6):665-681.
  16. Patel DM, Patel NM, Shah RR. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets containing Domperidone. Pharm Tech. 2020;11(1):68-75.
  17. Reddy LH, Ghosh BR. Fast dissolving drug delivery systems: A review of the literature. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(4):331-336.
  18. Gupta A, Mishra AK, Bansal P, Singh R, Kumar S, Gupta V. Recent trends of fast dissolving tablet: An overview of formulation technology. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2010;1(1):1-10.
  19. Sharma S, Gupta GD. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving tablets of Promethazine Theoclate. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2008;3(2):105-111.
  20. Badgujar BP, Mundada AS. The technologies used for developing orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Acta Pharm. 2011;61(2):117-139.
  21. Velmurugan S, Sundar Vinushitha S. Oral disintegrating tablets: An overview. Int J Chem Pharm Sci. 2010;1(2):1-12.
  22. Nayak AK, Manna K. Current developments in orally disintegrating tablet technology. J Pharm Educ Res. 2011;2(1):21-34.
  23. Fini A, Bergamante V, Ceschel GC, Ronchi C, Fonseca de Moraes CA. Fast dispersible/slow releasing ibuprofen tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69(1):335-341.
  24. Sharma S, Khan S, Mukherjee S. Pediatric drug delivery: Current status and future perspectives. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2016;21(3):176-185.
  25. Bansal K, Goel H, Rao R, Garg S. Novel drug delivery strategies for pediatric use. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8(5):663-679.
  26. Jaccard TT, Leyder J. Dissolution of fast disintegrating tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1985;11(3):987-990.
  27. Kuchekar BS, Badhan AC, Mahajan HS. Mouth dissolving tablets: A novel drug delivery system. Pharma Times. 2003;35(7):3-10.
  28. Giri TK, Tripathi DK, Majumdar R. Dissolution enhancement of poorly soluble drugs by solid dispersion technique. J Pharm Res Int. 2012;12(1):1-10.
  29. Chauhan B, Kumar G, Kalam N, Ansari SH. Optimization of fast dissolving tablets of Ibuprofen using response surface methodology. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;4(1):386-391.
  30. Gupta GD, Patel P, Prabhu P. Formulation development and evaluation of water dispersible tablets of Amoxicillin for pediatric use. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15(2):234-240.
  31. Gupta A, Sharma S, Kumar V. Formulation and evaluation of paracetamol water dispersible tablets using direct compression method. Int J Pharm Sci. 2021;13(3):45-50.
  32. Patel R, Chauhan P, Desai D. Development of ibuprofen water dispersible tablets using wet granulation technique. J Pharm Res. 2020;12(2):150-156.
  33. Sharma P, Kapoor R, Gupta M. Freeze-dried formulation of ondansetron water dispersible tablets for rapid disintegration. Asian J Pharm. 2019;10(1):25-30.
  34. Deshmukh T, Jain S, Goyal R. Evaluation of amoxicillin water dispersible tablets using direct compression with superdisintegrants. J Pharm Innov. 2018;7(4):178-182.
  35. Kumar S, Singh R. Microencapsulation approach for taste masking in diclofenac sodium water dispersible tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2017;79(5):810-815.
  36. Reddy S, Gupta N. Development of zinc sulfate water dispersible tablets for pediatric use via direct compression. Int J Pediatr Pharm. 2016;5(2):93-98.
  37. Singh D, Verma A. Formulation of cetirizine hydrochloride water dispersible tablets using direct compression and coating methods. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(3):175-180.
  38. Jain P, Chaudhary S. Fast dissolving loratadine water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;6(2):210-214.
  39. Chaudhary V, Arora R. Formulation development and stability studies of montelukast sodium water dispersible tablets. Int J Drug Deliv. 2014;4(1):99-105.
  40. Kapoor D, Patel T. Effervescent metformin HCl water dispersible tablets for enhanced patient compliance. J Appl Pharm. 2014;6(4):303-308.
  41. Verma R, Bansal P. Direct compression method for lisinopril water dispersible tablets: optimization and evaluation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2013;4(3):198-204.
  42. Bhattacharya K, Sengupta S. Formulation of vitamin C water dispersible tablets using wet granulation technique. Trop J Pharm Res. 2013;12(6):1015-1020.
  43. Gupta H, Sharma V. Direct compression of acetaminophen water dispersible tablets for improved patient compliance. J Drug Deliv. 2012;10(4):250-256.
  44. Mishra S, Gupta A. Development of freeze-dried aspirin water dispersible tablets for rapid onset of action. Pharm Dev Technol. 2012;17(3):243-248.
  45. Sinha A, Kumar A. Caffeine water dispersible tablets prepared by direct compression: formulation and evaluation. J Pharm Sci. 2011;14(2):120-125.
  46. Rani P, Jain D. Wet granulation technique for clindamycin water dispersible tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011;73(5):623-628.
  47. Bansal S, Mehta V. Ranitidine HCl water dispersible tablets: taste masking and evaluation using direct compression. J Chem Pharm Res. 2010;2(3):45-50.
  48. Dixit R, Chaudhary S. Azithromycin water dispersible tablets with taste masking by coating method. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;4(2):88-92.
  49. Jadhav S, Desai K. Direct compression of fexofenadine water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2010;1(4):200-206.
  50. Patel A, Rana S. Levocetirizine water dispersible tablets using wet granulation: optimization and evaluation. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2009;11(2):67-72.
  51. Singh R, Gupta N. Direct compression method for sildenafil citrate water dispersible tablets. J Pharm Sci. 2009;15(1):123-127.
  52. Sharma V, Kapoor P. Freeze-dried atorvastatin water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Int J Drug Deliv. 2008;2(3):231-237.
  53. Mehta M, Jain V. Formulation of ibuprofen water dispersible tablets by direct compression. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2008;3(4):350-355.
  54. Rao P, Rao K. Taste masking and formulation of sildenafil citrate water dispersible tablets using wet granulation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2007;69(6):711-715.
  55. Desai S, Patel T. Direct compression of cefixime water dispersible tablets with improved taste and mechanical properties. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2007;5(2):150-155.
  56. Tiwari R, Agrawal N. Effervescent guaifenesin water dispersible tablets for enhanced dissolution and patient compliance. J Pharm Res. 2006;5(3):301-306.
  57. Jain S, Kapoor A. Freeze-drying technique for doxycycline water dispersible tablets. Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11(4):421-426.
  58. Chauhan M, Singh T. Direct compression of dextromethorphan water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2005;67(5):597-601.
  59. Rana V, Agnihotri V. Wet granulation technique for chlorpheniramine maleate water dispersible tablets. Int J Pharm Sci. 2005;2(3):78-83.
  60. Bhatia S, Kumar P. Freeze-dried simvastatin water dispersible tablets for rapid disintegration. Trop J Pharm Res. 2004;3(1):105-110.

Reference

  1. Kumari S, Vishwakarma DK, Jayant V. Formulation and evaluation of mouth dissolving tablet of Nimesulide using sublimation technique. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;10(4):1750-1760.
  2. Ibrahim MA, Ibrahim MI, Yousif YA. Development and evaluation of fast-dissolving tablets for pediatric use: A review. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2020;12(1):25-36.
  3. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib B, Chandira MR, Pankaj K, Jayakar B. Fast dissolving tablet: An overview. J Chem Pharm Res. 2009;1(1):163-177.
  4. Habib W, Khankari RK, Hontz J. Fast-dissolve drug delivery systems. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2000;17(1):61-72.
  5. Jha SK, Sharma A, Kumar P, Malviya R. Mouth dissolving tablet: An overview. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2011;2(3):9-15.
  6. Goel H, Rai P, Rana V, Tiwary AK. Orally disintegrating systems: Innovations in formulation and technology. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2008;2(3):258-274.
  7. Patel TS, Sengupta M. Fast dissolving tablet technology: A review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;4(6):533-551.
  8. Deshmukh VN, Patel JS, Singh AK, Sharma H. Formulation and evaluation of water-dispersible tablets of ibuprofen for pediatric use. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9(4):1010-1017.
  9. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablet formulation and design considerations for pediatric patients. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL, editors. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1987. p. 293-345.
  10. Baldi F, Malfertheiner P. Novel delivery systems in pediatrics: Advances in water-dispersible tablets. Pediatr Drugs. 2019;21(3):183-192.
  11. Kaur T, Gill B, Kumar S, Gupta GD. Mouth dissolving tablets: A novel approach to drug delivery. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2011;3(1):1-7.
  12. Parkash V, Maan S, Deepika, Yadav SK, Hemlata, Jogpal V. Fast disintegrating tablets: Opportunity in drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2(4):223-235.
  13. Bhatt S, Thakkar D. Water dispersible tablets: A revolution in pediatric drug delivery. Pharma Times. 2021;53(3):19-24.
  14. Wagh MA, Kothawade PD, Salunkhe KS, Chavan NV, Daga VR. Techniques used in orally disintegrating drug delivery system. Int J Drug Deliv. 2010;2(2):98-107.
  15. Gavini E, Sanna V, Rassu G, Cossu M, Giunchedi P. Orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18(6):665-681.
  16. Patel DM, Patel NM, Shah RR. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets containing Domperidone. Pharm Tech. 2020;11(1):68-75.
  17. Reddy LH, Ghosh BR. Fast dissolving drug delivery systems: A review of the literature. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(4):331-336.
  18. Gupta A, Mishra AK, Bansal P, Singh R, Kumar S, Gupta V. Recent trends of fast dissolving tablet: An overview of formulation technology. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2010;1(1):1-10.
  19. Sharma S, Gupta GD. Formulation and characterization of fast dissolving tablets of Promethazine Theoclate. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2008;3(2):105-111.
  20. Badgujar BP, Mundada AS. The technologies used for developing orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Acta Pharm. 2011;61(2):117-139.
  21. Velmurugan S, Sundar Vinushitha S. Oral disintegrating tablets: An overview. Int J Chem Pharm Sci. 2010;1(2):1-12.
  22. Nayak AK, Manna K. Current developments in orally disintegrating tablet technology. J Pharm Educ Res. 2011;2(1):21-34.
  23. Fini A, Bergamante V, Ceschel GC, Ronchi C, Fonseca de Moraes CA. Fast dispersible/slow releasing ibuprofen tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69(1):335-341.
  24. Sharma S, Khan S, Mukherjee S. Pediatric drug delivery: Current status and future perspectives. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2016;21(3):176-185.
  25. Bansal K, Goel H, Rao R, Garg S. Novel drug delivery strategies for pediatric use. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8(5):663-679.
  26. Jaccard TT, Leyder J. Dissolution of fast disintegrating tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1985;11(3):987-990.
  27. Kuchekar BS, Badhan AC, Mahajan HS. Mouth dissolving tablets: A novel drug delivery system. Pharma Times. 2003;35(7):3-10.
  28. Giri TK, Tripathi DK, Majumdar R. Dissolution enhancement of poorly soluble drugs by solid dispersion technique. J Pharm Res Int. 2012;12(1):1-10.
  29. Chauhan B, Kumar G, Kalam N, Ansari SH. Optimization of fast dissolving tablets of Ibuprofen using response surface methodology. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;4(1):386-391.
  30. Gupta GD, Patel P, Prabhu P. Formulation development and evaluation of water dispersible tablets of Amoxicillin for pediatric use. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15(2):234-240.
  31. Gupta A, Sharma S, Kumar V. Formulation and evaluation of paracetamol water dispersible tablets using direct compression method. Int J Pharm Sci. 2021;13(3):45-50.
  32. Patel R, Chauhan P, Desai D. Development of ibuprofen water dispersible tablets using wet granulation technique. J Pharm Res. 2020;12(2):150-156.
  33. Sharma P, Kapoor R, Gupta M. Freeze-dried formulation of ondansetron water dispersible tablets for rapid disintegration. Asian J Pharm. 2019;10(1):25-30.
  34. Deshmukh T, Jain S, Goyal R. Evaluation of amoxicillin water dispersible tablets using direct compression with superdisintegrants. J Pharm Innov. 2018;7(4):178-182.
  35. Kumar S, Singh R. Microencapsulation approach for taste masking in diclofenac sodium water dispersible tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2017;79(5):810-815.
  36. Reddy S, Gupta N. Development of zinc sulfate water dispersible tablets for pediatric use via direct compression. Int J Pediatr Pharm. 2016;5(2):93-98.
  37. Singh D, Verma A. Formulation of cetirizine hydrochloride water dispersible tablets using direct compression and coating methods. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(3):175-180.
  38. Jain P, Chaudhary S. Fast dissolving loratadine water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;6(2):210-214.
  39. Chaudhary V, Arora R. Formulation development and stability studies of montelukast sodium water dispersible tablets. Int J Drug Deliv. 2014;4(1):99-105.
  40. Kapoor D, Patel T. Effervescent metformin HCl water dispersible tablets for enhanced patient compliance. J Appl Pharm. 2014;6(4):303-308.
  41. Verma R, Bansal P. Direct compression method for lisinopril water dispersible tablets: optimization and evaluation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2013;4(3):198-204.
  42. Bhattacharya K, Sengupta S. Formulation of vitamin C water dispersible tablets using wet granulation technique. Trop J Pharm Res. 2013;12(6):1015-1020.
  43. Gupta H, Sharma V. Direct compression of acetaminophen water dispersible tablets for improved patient compliance. J Drug Deliv. 2012;10(4):250-256.
  44. Mishra S, Gupta A. Development of freeze-dried aspirin water dispersible tablets for rapid onset of action. Pharm Dev Technol. 2012;17(3):243-248.
  45. Sinha A, Kumar A. Caffeine water dispersible tablets prepared by direct compression: formulation and evaluation. J Pharm Sci. 2011;14(2):120-125.
  46. Rani P, Jain D. Wet granulation technique for clindamycin water dispersible tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011;73(5):623-628.
  47. Bansal S, Mehta V. Ranitidine HCl water dispersible tablets: taste masking and evaluation using direct compression. J Chem Pharm Res. 2010;2(3):45-50.
  48. Dixit R, Chaudhary S. Azithromycin water dispersible tablets with taste masking by coating method. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;4(2):88-92.
  49. Jadhav S, Desai K. Direct compression of fexofenadine water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2010;1(4):200-206.
  50. Patel A, Rana S. Levocetirizine water dispersible tablets using wet granulation: optimization and evaluation. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2009;11(2):67-72.
  51. Singh R, Gupta N. Direct compression method for sildenafil citrate water dispersible tablets. J Pharm Sci. 2009;15(1):123-127.
  52. Sharma V, Kapoor P. Freeze-dried atorvastatin water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Int J Drug Deliv. 2008;2(3):231-237.
  53. Mehta M, Jain V. Formulation of ibuprofen water dispersible tablets by direct compression. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2008;3(4):350-355.
  54. Rao P, Rao K. Taste masking and formulation of sildenafil citrate water dispersible tablets using wet granulation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2007;69(6):711-715.
  55. Desai S, Patel T. Direct compression of cefixime water dispersible tablets with improved taste and mechanical properties. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2007;5(2):150-155.
  56. Tiwari R, Agrawal N. Effervescent guaifenesin water dispersible tablets for enhanced dissolution and patient compliance. J Pharm Res. 2006;5(3):301-306.
  57. Jain S, Kapoor A. Freeze-drying technique for doxycycline water dispersible tablets. Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11(4):421-426.
  58. Chauhan M, Singh T. Direct compression of dextromethorphan water dispersible tablets: formulation and evaluation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2005;67(5):597-601.
  59. Rana V, Agnihotri V. Wet granulation technique for chlorpheniramine maleate water dispersible tablets. Int J Pharm Sci. 2005;2(3):78-83.
  60. Bhatia S, Kumar P. Freeze-dried simvastatin water dispersible tablets for rapid disintegration. Trop J Pharm Res. 2004;3(1):105-110.

Photo
Unnati Dhumal
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat (India)

Photo
Dr. Nilesh Gorde
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat (India)

Photo
Swapnil Phalak
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat (India)

Unnati Dhumal*, Dr. Nilesh Gorde, Swapnil Phalak, Formulation Development and Evaluation of Water Dispersible Tablet for Pediatrics, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 4, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15127233

More related articles
Related Articles
Review On Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Hair Serum ...
Gaurav Khairnar, Yogesh Chaudhari, Swapnil Phalak, ...
A Critical Review on Floating Drug Delivery System: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmac...
Sarita More, Bharat Tekade, Shraddha Mali, Swapnil Phalak, ...
More related articles