Department of Pharmaceutics, Konkan Gyanpeeth Rahul Dharkar College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat (India)
Pediatric patients require tailored pharmaceutical formulations due to their unique physiological and developmental characteristics. Water dispersible tablets (WDTs) are an innovative dosage form that addresses several challenges in pediatric drug delivery, such as poor patient compliance and difficulty in swallowing. This review explores the importance of WDTs for pediatric patients, formulation considerations, and evaluation parameters. The article discusses various excipients, manufacturing methods, and challenges in developing WDTs. Furthermore, recent advances in pediatric formulations, regulatory perspectives, and future trends are highlighted, emphasizing the need for continued innovation in this area.
Water dispersible tablets (WDTs) are an innovative and patient-friendly dosage form specifically designed to disintegrate rapidly in water or saliva, creating a smooth dispersion that is easy to swallow. These tablets are particularly advantageous for pediatric, geriatric, and dysphagic patients who often struggle with swallowing conventional solid dosage forms like tablets and capsules [1].
Figure 1: Water dispersible tablets
Pediatric patients present unique challenges in drug administration due to their developmental differences, difficulty in swallowing pills, and heightened sensitivity to the taste of medications. Given these challenges, there is a need for age-appropriate formulations that are easy to administer, well-tolerated, and ensure accurate dosing. Water dispersible tablets cater to these needs by offering a convenient, palatable, and flexible drug delivery option [2,3].
Key Features of Water Dispersible Tablets:
Need for Pediatric-Friendly Formulations
Pediatric patients often face difficulties with conventional dosage forms like tablets and capsules due to their inability to swallow whole pills. Therefore, there is a pressing need for age-appropriate, palatable, and easy-to-administer formulations. WDTs are a promising solution designed to disintegrate rapidly in water, forming a palatable dispersion that can be easily swallowed. They combine the advantages of solid dosage forms, such as stability and accurate dosing, with the ease of liquid formulations [6].
Children, especially those under the age of 5, face significant challenges when taking medications in solid form. Traditional dosage forms such as capsules and uncoated tablets are often unsuitable due to the risk of choking and difficulty swallowing. Liquid formulations, while easier to administer, may have limitations such as poor stability, unpleasant taste, and complex dosing requirements. Water dispersible tablets provide a middle ground, combining the stability of solid dosage forms with the ease of administration of liquid forms, making them an ideal solution for pediatric patients [7-9].
Formulation Considerations for Water Dispersible Tablets
The development of an effective WDT requires careful selection of excipients and consideration of the properties of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The key components of the formulation include:
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)
Candidates for Water Dispersible Tablets
Water dispersible tablets are particularly suited for drugs that exhibit specific physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Firstly, the drug should have good solubility in both water and saliva to ensure rapid disintegration and dissolution in the oral cavity, facilitating swift onset of action. The drug's ionization profile is also important; at the oral cavity pH (approximately 6.8), the compound should be partially nonionized. This nonionized form is more lipophilic, enabling better diffusion and absorption across the mucosal membranes. Additionally, the drug should have the capability to diffuse and partition effectively into the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) epithelium, enhancing systemic absorption upon swallowing the dissolved drug. For rapid absorption through the oral mucosa, the compound should possess good permeability characteristics, allowing it to penetrate the mucosal tissue efficiently. Lastly, drugs with a short half-life that require frequent dosing are excellent candidates for disintegrating formulations. The rapid onset provided by these formulations can reduce the dosing frequency and enhance patient compliance, especially in pediatric and geriatric populations where swallowing conventional tablets may be challenging [11-13].
Excipients
Excipients play a crucial role in the formulation of WDTs. The primary excipients used include [14-18]:
Taste Masking Agents
Given the sensitivity of pediatric patients to bitter tastes, taste masking is an essential consideration. Techniques used include:
Manufacturing Methods for Water Dispersible Tablets
Direct Compression
In the Direct Compression method, the process begins with the selection of excipients like superdisintegrants (e.g., Crospovidone), fillers (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose), and lubricants (e.g., magnesium stearate). These are sifted through a fine mesh to ensure uniform particle size. The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and excipients are then blended using a mixer to form a homogeneous powder blend. After blending, a lubricant is added and mixed gently to prevent capping or lamination during compression. The final blend is fed into a tablet press machine to produce tablets. The resulting tablets are then evaluated for weight uniformity, hardness, friability, disintegration time, and dissolution to ensure they meet quality standards [21].
Wet Granulation
For Wet Granulation, the process starts with sifting the API, fillers, and disintegrants. A binder solution is prepared by dissolving a binder (like PVP K30) in a solvent such as water or ethanol. This binder solution is added to the powder blend while mixing to form a wet mass. The wet mass is then passed through a sieve to form granules, which are dried in a tray dryer or fluidized bed dryer. Once dried, the granules are milled to achieve uniform size and mixed with additional disintegrants and lubricants. The final blend is compressed into tablets, which are then subjected to quality control tests including hardness, friability, and disintegration time to ensure they disperse quickly in water [23].
Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization)
The Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization) method involves preparing a solution of the API, matrix formers (such as mannitol or sucrose), and disintegrants in water. This solution is then dispensed into pre-formed blister cavities or molds. The filled trays are quickly frozen at a temperature below -40°C to solidify the mixture. The frozen solution undergoes primary drying in a freeze-dryer, where a vacuum is applied to sublimate the water directly from ice to vapor, leaving behind a porous structure. This is followed by secondary drying at a slightly higher temperature to remove any remaining moisture. The resulting porous tablets are highly friable and are sealed immediately in moisture-resistant packaging. The tablets produced via freeze-drying disintegrate rapidly in water or saliva due to their porous structure. Finally, all the tablets from each method are evaluated for key quality attributes such as disintegration time, dissolution profile, and stability to ensure they meet the desired specifications for water-dispersible tablets [21,25].
Table 1: Comparison of Methods
Parameter |
Direct Compression |
Wet Granulation |
Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization) |
Cost |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
Process Complexity |
Simple |
Moderate |
Complex |
API Suitability |
APIs with good flow/compressibility |
APIs with poor flow properties |
Heat/moisture-sensitive APIs |
Disintegration Time |
Fast |
Moderate |
Very fast |
Equipment Requirement |
Tablet press |
Granulator, dryer, tablet press |
Freeze-dryer, tablet press |
Moisture Sensitivity |
Not suitable for sensitive APIs |
Moderate moisture exposure |
Minimal exposure |
Evaluation Parameters for Water Dispersible Tablets
Physical characterization of water-dispersible tablets is an essential aspect of their quality evaluation, focusing on various properties that affect the tablet's performance, stability, and patient acceptability [26].
1. Appearance and Organoleptic Properties
The initial physical characterization involves a visual inspection to assess the appearance of the tablets. This includes evaluating the color, shape, size, surface texture, and any visible defects like chipping, cracking, or uneven coating. Organoleptic properties, such as taste, odor, and mouthfeel, are also assessed, as these factors are crucial for patient compliance, particularly in pediatric and geriatric populations who may be sensitive to unpleasant tastes or textures [26].
2. Weight Uniformity
Weight uniformity is a critical parameter that ensures consistent dosing of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). This test involves weighing individual tablets from a batch and comparing their weights. Uniform weight indicates uniform distribution of the API and excipients, which is vital for maintaining the efficacy and safety of the dosage form. According to pharmacopeial standards, the weight of each tablet should fall within a specified range, typically ±7.5% for tablets weighing 130–324 mg [26,27].
3. Tablet Dimensions (Thickness and Diameter)
The thickness and diameter of the tablets are measured using vernier calipers or micrometers. These physical dimensions are important for ensuring uniform size, which affects packaging and handling. Consistency in thickness and diameter also contributes to uniform weight and dosage, while deviations may indicate issues during compression, such as variations in the force applied or inconsistent filling of the die cavity [28].
4. Hardness
Hardness is a measure of the tablet's mechanical strength, determining its ability to withstand physical stresses during packaging, handling, and transportation. The test is performed using a hardness tester, which applies force until the tablet breaks. For water-dispersible tablets, a balance between hardness and rapid disintegration is required, with typical hardness values ranging from 2 to 4 kg/cm² [28,29].
5. Friability
Friability assesses the tablet's resistance to abrasion and crumbling. This is determined using a friabilator, where a sample of pre-weighed tablets is rotated at a specified speed and then reweighed. The percentage weight loss is calculated, and a friability value of less than 1% is generally considered acceptable. Low friability indicates good mechanical strength and durability of the tablets [29].
6. Porosity and Density
The porosity of a tablet affects its disintegration and dissolution rates, making it a crucial parameter for water-dispersible tablets. Porosity can be evaluated using techniques such as mercury intrusion porosimetry. Density measurements, including bulk density and tapped density, are also performed to understand the packing properties of the powder blend before compression. The Carr's Index and Hausner ratio, derived from density measurements, provide insights into the flowability and compressibility of the powder blend [27,29].
7. Moisture Content
Moisture content is an important factor influencing the stability and disintegration of the tablet. Excess moisture can lead to degradation of the API, affecting the tablet's shelf life, while insufficient moisture may reduce the tablet's disintegration ability. The moisture content is determined using techniques like loss on drying (LOD) or Karl Fischer titration. Controlling moisture content is especially crucial for water-dispersible tablets to ensure rapid disintegration upon contact with water [29].
8. Wetting Time and Water Absorption Ratio
The wetting time measures how quickly a tablet becomes completely wet when placed on the surface of a liquid. It is a key parameter for assessing the disintegration performance of water-dispersible tablets. The water absorption ratio is calculated based on the increase in tablet weight after being exposed to water. These tests are indicators of how well the tablet will disperse in water or saliva, which is essential for patient compliance and rapid onset of action [26].
Challenges in Developing Water Dispersible Tablets
Table 2: Studies on the Formulation Development and Evaluation of WDTs
Study Reference |
Drug |
Method Used |
Key Evaluation Parameters |
Gupta et al. (2021) |
Paracetamol |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, dissolution profile, taste masking |
Patel et al. (2020) |
Ibuprofen |
Wet Granulation |
Flow properties, weight variation, friability, dissolution rate |
Sharma et al. (2019) |
Ondansetron |
Freeze-Drying |
Disintegration time, mechanical strength, taste evaluation |
Deshmukh et al. (2018) |
Amoxicillin |
Direct Compression |
Hardness, friability, drug release, moisture content |
Kumar et al. (2017) |
Diclofenac Sodium |
Wet Granulation |
Taste masking, dissolution profile, stability studies |
Reddy et al. (2016) |
Zinc Sulfate |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, uniformity, taste acceptability |
Singh et al. (2015) |
Cetirizine Hydrochloride |
Coating Method |
Dissolution efficiency, taste masking, mechanical properties |
Jain et al. (2015) |
Loratadine |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration, dissolution, taste masking, friability |
Chaudhary et al. (2014) |
Montelukast Sodium |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, dissolution rate, stability |
Kapoor et al. (2014) |
Metformin HCl |
Effervescent Method |
Disintegration, taste masking, mechanical strength |
Verma et al. (2013) |
Lisinopril |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, tablet hardness, dissolution profile |
Bhattacharya et al. (2013) |
Vitamin C |
Wet Granulation |
Dissolution, stability, taste evaluation |
Gupta et al. (2012) |
Acetaminophen |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration, dissolution, friability |
Mishra et al. (2012) |
Aspirin |
Freeze-Drying |
Disintegration, mechanical strength, taste masking |
Sinha et al. (2011) |
Caffeine |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration, hardness, dissolution rate |
Rani et al. (2011) |
Clindamycin |
Wet Granulation |
Weight variation, disintegration time, friability |
Bansal et al. (2010) |
Ranitidine HCl |
Direct Compression |
Taste masking, dissolution profile, tablet hardness |
Dixit et al. (2010) |
Azithromycin |
Coating Method |
Disintegration, taste masking, stability |
Jadhav et al. (2010) |
Fexofenadine |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, dissolution rate, uniformity |
Patel et al. (2009) |
Levocetirizine |
Wet Granulation |
Dissolution, friability, disintegration time |
Singh et al. (2009) |
Sildenafil Citrate |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration, hardness, taste masking |
Sharma et al. (2008) |
Atorvastatin |
Freeze-Drying |
Taste masking, mechanical properties, dissolution rate |
Mehta et al. (2008) |
Ibuprofen |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, dissolution profile, taste masking |
Rao et al. (2007) |
Sildenafil Citrate |
Wet Granulation |
Taste masking, disintegration, dissolution rate |
Desai et al. (2007) |
Cefixime |
Direct Compression |
Taste masking, mechanical properties, dissolution profile |
Tiwari et al. (2006) |
Guaifenesin |
Effervescent Method |
Dissolution, taste masking, tablet strength |
Jain et al. (2006) |
Doxycycline |
Freeze-Drying |
Disintegration, taste masking, dissolution rate |
Chauhan et al. (2005) |
Dextromethorphan |
Direct Compression |
Disintegration time, taste evaluation, friability |
Rana et al. (2005) |
Chlorpheniramine Maleate |
Wet Granulation |
Dissolution rate, disintegration, uniformity |
Bhatia et al. (2004) |
Simvastatin |
Freeze-Drying |
Taste masking, dissolution profile, mechanical strength |
CONCLUSION
Water dispersible tablets offer a promising solution for improving drug administration in pediatric and other patient populations who have difficulty swallowing conventional tablets. Their ease of use, flexibility, and enhanced patient compliance make them an attractive choice for pharmaceutical manufacturers. However, the successful development of WDTs requires a careful balance of formulation strategies, taste masking techniques, and rigorous evaluation methods. Continued research and innovation are needed to optimize this dosage form, expand its applications, and meet the evolving needs of patients and healthcare providers. This comprehensive approach ensures that WDTs can provide effective, safe, and patient-friendly drug delivery, enhancing therapeutic outcomes and quality of life for pediatric patients.
REFERENCES
Unnati Dhumal*, Dr. Nilesh Gorde, Swapnil Phalak, Formulation Development and Evaluation of Water Dispersible Tablet for Pediatrics, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 4, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15127233