1,2,3,5Hindu College of Pharmacy Guntur.
4Medical oncologist, Government General Hospital.
Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a prevalent and distressing side effect experienced by cancer patients undergoing platinum-based and AC-T chemotherapy regimens. Despite advancements in antiemetic strategies, a substantial proportion of patients continue to experience inadequate control of CINV, leading to compromised quality of life and treatment compliance. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safe ty of low-dose olanzapine, when administered alongside standard antiemetic therapy, in preventing both acute and delayed phases of CINV. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled observational cohort study was conducted at the Department of Oncology, Government General Hospital, Guntur, India, from February 2024 to April 2024. Eighty eligible patients were randomized into two groups: standard antiemetics alone (n=40) and standard antiemetics with low-dose olanzapine (5 mg daily) (n=40). Incidence and severity of CINV were assessed during acute (0–24 h) and delayed (24–120 h) phases. Results: The addition of low-dose olanzapine significantly reduced both incidence and severity of acute and delayed CINV compared to control (p<0.05). A higher proportion of patients in the olanzapine group achieved complete response (no emesis, no rescue medication). Adverse events were mild and comparable between groups. Conclusion: Low-dose olanzapine is an effective and well-tolerated adjunct for CINV prevention in platinum-based and AC-T regimens. These results support its inclusion in standard antiemetic protocols.
Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone in the treatment of various malignancies; however, it is often associated with significant adverse effects, among which nausea and vomiting are the most debilitating. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) affects up to 80% of patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy, despite the use of standard antiemetic regimens that include 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. Effective control of CINV is vital to ensuring patient comfort, improving quality of life, and maintaining adherence to treatment. Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, has demonstrated antiemetic efficacy through antagonism at multiple neurotransmitter receptors, including dopamine, serotonin, histamine, and muscarinic receptors. Low-dose olanzapine has emerged as a promising adjunct to standard antiemetic therapy, with prior studies showing improved control of both acute and delayed CINV.
Figure :1 Pathophysiology of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Figure 2: Moa of Olanzapine
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Design: This prospective observational cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose olanzapine for CINV prevention.
Study Site and Duration: Conducted in the Department of Oncology, Government General Hospital, Guntur, India, from February 2024 to April 2024.
Participants: Eighty adult patients (≥25 years) scheduled for platinum-based or AC-T regimen chemotherapy were enrolled after written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included hypersensitivity to olanzapine, significant hepatic/renal/cardiac impairment, pregnancy, and concurrent interacting medications.
Randomisation And Intervention: Patients were randomized into two groups (n=40 each):
- Control: Standard antiemetic therapy (5-HT3 antagonist + dexamethasone ± NK-1 antagonist)
- Test: Standard therapy + olanzapine 5 mg orally once daily from one day prior to chemotherapy through four days post-chemotherapy.
Outcomes: Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of acute (0–24 h) and delayed (24–120 h) CINV. Secondary outcomes included complete response rates and adverse events.
Data Collection: Demographics, chemotherapy details, and CINV assessments were recorded using profile forms and the MANE scale. Adverse events were monitored.
Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS. Within-group comparisons employed paired t-tests; between-group comparisons used independent t-tests on change scores. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Baseline Characteristics: The two groups were comparable in age (mean ± SD: 52.4 ± 11.2 vs. 51.8 ± 10.7 years), gender distribution (M/F: 12/28 vs. 10/30), and diagnosis/regimens.
Paired t-test analyses demonstrated significant reductions in nausea scores in both drug (mean change -2.62; t=21.35; p=7.91×10?²?) and no-drug groups (mean change -1.24; t=13.00; p=3.93×10?¹?). Vomiting scores also decreased significantly (drug: mean change -2.43; t=19.80; p<0.001; no drug: -1.28; t=12.11; p<0.001). Independent t-test on change scores confirmed superior improvement in the olanzapine group for both nausea (t=-8.89; p=1.18×10?¹³) and vomiting (t=-7.45; p<0.001).
Table 1. Baseline Demographics of the Study Participants
Parameter |
Drug Group (n=40) |
No Drug Group (n=40) |
Age (Mean ± SD) |
52.4 ± 11.2 |
51.8 ± 10.7 |
Gender (M/F) |
12 / 28 |
10 / 30 |
Diagnosis |
Breast, GI, Lung |
Breast, GI, Lung |
Chemotherapy Regimen |
Platinum-based, AC-T |
Platinum-based, AC-T |
Table 2. Nausea – Paired Sample Statistics
Group |
Mean Before |
SD Before |
Mean After |
SD After |
Drug Group |
3.00 |
0.45 |
0.38 |
0.22 |
No Drug Group |
3.02 |
0.48 |
1.79 |
0.57 |
Table 3. Nausea – Paired Sample Correlation
Group |
Correlation (r) |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Drug Group |
0.77 |
<0.001 |
No Drug Group |
0.68 |
<0.001 |
Table 4. Nausea – Paired Samples T-Test Results
Group |
Mean Difference |
t-statistic |
df |
p-value |
Drug Group |
-2.62 |
21.35 |
39 |
7.91×10?²? |
No Drug Group |
-1.24 |
13.00 |
39 |
3.93×10?¹? |
Table 5. Vomiting – Paired Sample Statistics
Group |
Mean Before |
SD Before |
Mean After |
SD After |
Drug Group |
2.85 |
0.51 |
0.42 |
0.27 |
No Drug Group |
2.91 |
0.49 |
1.63 |
0.61 |
Table 6. Vomiting – Paired Sample Correlation
Group |
Correlation (r) |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Drug Group |
0.81 |
<0.001 |
No Drug Group |
0.70 |
<0.001 |
Table 7. Vomiting – Paired Samples T-Test Results
Group |
Mean Difference |
t-statistic |
df |
p-value |
Drug Group |
-2.43 |
19.80 |
39 |
<0.001 |
No Drug Group |
-1.28 |
12.11 |
39 |
<0.001 |
Figure 3: Comparison Of Vomiting (Before Vs After)
Figure 4: Comparison of Nausea (Before Vs After)
X Axis- Patients Y Axis- Nausea Grades
Figure 5: Graph For Patients and Response with And Without Drug
CONCLUSION
The present study provides compelling evidence supporting the clinical utility of low-dose olanzapine in combination with standard antiemetic therapy for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Olanzapine significantly reduced both acute and delayed CINV without increasing adverse events, suggesting its value as an adjunctive agent in oncology practice. Future multicenter randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings and optimize dosing strategies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We extend our sincere gratitude to Dr. T.V. Siva Rama Krishna and Dr. D. Krishna Priyanka for their guidance. We thank the Principal and staff of Hindu College of Pharmacy and the administration of Government General Hospital, Guntur, for logistical support. Finally, our appreciation goes to the patients and their families for their participation.
REFERENCES
Tanuja Bheemarasetti, Karumanchi Nagurmeera, Tadimalla Sherli, Dr. T. V. Sivaramakrishna, Dr. D. Krishna Priyanka, Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Olanzapine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Platinum-Based and AC-T Regimens: A Prospective Observational Study, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 6, 882-888. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15599295