1,2AGM College of Pharmacy, Varur Hubballi.
3School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jagatpura, Rajasthan.
4Kishori College of Pharmacy, Beed.
5,6Swami Institute of Pharmacy, Abhona.
Novel drug delivery systems have paved the way for nano- and micro-formulation techniques, addressing the challenges of poorly soluble and permeable drugs. Among these, lipid-based nanoparticles, such as liposomes, niosomes, and micelles, have gained widespread acceptance and are FDA-approved. These lipid-based systems are particularly beneficial for delivering natural phytoconstituents and enhancing the solubility, permeability, and bioavailability of drugs, especially those classified under BCS Class II and Class IV. This article reviews recent developments and applications of lipid-based dosage forms in improving therapeutic efficacy.
Novel drug delivery systems (NDDS) have opened new avenues for the development of nano- and micro-formulations, offering solutions to the challenges posed by poorly soluble and poorly permeable drugs, particularly those classified under Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Classes II and IV. These advanced systems aim to deliver drugs directly to the target site in low concentrations, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficiency. NDDS encompasses a wide variety of formulations, including microparticles, nanoparticles, and lipid-based carriers such as liposomes, niosomes, phytosomes, micelles, hydrogels, quantum dots, nanotubes, and dendrimers. Nanoparticulate systems, typically ranging from 1 to 100 nm in size, facilitate improved drug movement across biological barriers due to their nanoscale properties. This advancement has led to a broad spectrum of applications in both treatment and diagnostics. Lipid-based drug delivery systems, including liposomes, niosomes, and micelles, have gained considerable popularity and are FDA-approved. These lipid-based systems have proven to be effective for the delivery of natural phytoconstituents and inorganic particles like gold. One of the major advantages of lipid-based NDDS is their compatibility with a wide range of drugs, improving their solubility, permeability, and bioavailability.
Reasons for the Use of NDDS for BCS Class II and IV Drugs:
Solubility and Permeability Considerations
Solubility is a crucial factor that directly influences drug activity and bioavailability. Several factors affect the solubility of drugs, such as the drug’s pKa, the pH of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and the luminal pH. Physiological and physicochemical properties of the drug also play an important role in solubility. According to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP 38) and the European Pharmacopoeia, solubility is categorized into seven distinct groups. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), introduced by Amidon et al. in 1995, classifies drugs based on their solubility and permeability characteristics. This system is widely used for the development of immediate-release oral dosage forms. BCS Class II and IV drugs, which face significant challenges related to solubility and permeability, require specialized formulation strategies to enhance their therapeutic potential.
Table 1. BCS Classification
|
Class |
Solubility |
Permeability |
Example |
|
Class I |
High |
High |
Metoprolol, diltiazem, verapamil, propranolol etc. |
|
Class II |
Low |
High |
Ibuprofen, ketoprofen, carvedilol, ketoconazole, fenofibrate etc. |
|
Class III |
High |
Low |
Cimetidine, ranitidine, acyclovir, neomycin B, atenolol, captopril. |
|
Class IV |
Low |
Low |
Hydrochlorothiazide, taxol, furosemide. |
BCS Class II drugs can be further categorized into subclasses based on their acidic or basic nature (Table 2). The solubility of these drugs can be significantly affected by variations in the pH environment within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT).
Table 2. BCS Sub classification
|
Class II |
Solubility |
Example |
|
|
Gastric pH solubility |
Intestinal pH solubility |
||
|
Class II a (Weakly acidic drugs) |
Low |
Dissolve quickly |
Ibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, rifampicin etc |
|
Class II b (Weakly basic drugs) |
High |
Precipitate |
Carvedilol, ketoconazole, ibuprofen, ketoprofen etc |
|
Class II c (Neutral drugs) |
No dependent on pH change |
Fenofibrate etc. |
|
Types of Lipid-Based Nano Drug Delivery Systems
The development of effective drug formulations is often hindered by challenges such as low aqueous solubility, limited permeability, poor absorption, significant first-pass metabolism, systemic degradation, and the activity of efflux transporters like P-glycoprotein. These factors greatly impact the clinical performance of many therapeutic agents. To address these limitations, researchers have explored various advanced drug delivery approaches, including lipid-based systems, polymer-based carriers, nanocarriers, nanocrystals, liquisolid technology, and solid dispersions (Figure 1). Among these, lipid-based nanoparticulate formulations have shown significant promise due to their ability to enhance solubility, improve bioavailability, and bypass metabolic barriers.
Liposomes
Liposomes are spherical vesicular structures composed of amphiphilic phospholipids, which have the unique ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drug molecules. Due to their amphiphilic nature, these lipids can self-assemble into bilayered vesicles, making liposomes highly versatile carriers for various therapeutic agents.
Mechanism of Liposome Formation
Liposome formation begins by introducing lipid components into an aqueous environment. Through hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions—either between lipid molecules themselves or between lipids and water—bilayer structures are formed (Figure 2). These bilayers can then organize into vesicles under the influence of external energy sources such as sonication, homogenization, heating, or freeze-thaw cycles. This energy input helps in shaping and stabilizing the vesicular structures for effective drug delivery.
Mechanism of liposome formation
A. Classification of Liposomes Based on Size and Lamellarity
Liposomes can be categorized based on their size, number of lipid bilayers, and structural arrangement. One major classification divides them into multilamellar and unilamellar vesicles:
Although unilamellar vesicles share the same structural design, they differ primarily in their size, which influences drug loading and release characteristics.
Classification of Liposomes
Liposomes can be classified based on size and lamellarity, lipid composition, and preparation methods. Each classification provides insight into their structure, behavior, and potential therapeutic applications.
A. Based on Size and Lamellarity
Liposomes vary in size and the number of lipid bilayers they contain. These characteristics influence drug loading, release profiles, and cellular uptake.
Table 3: Types of Liposomes According to Size
|
Type |
Size Range |
|
Multilamellar Large Vesicles (MLV) |
> 0.5 µm |
|
Oligolamellar Vesicles (OLV) |
0.1 – 1.0 µm |
|
Unilamellar Vesicles (ULV) |
0.1 nm – 1000 µm |
|
Small Unilamellar Vesicles (SUV) |
20 – 100 nm |
|
Large Unilamellar Vesicles (LUV) |
> 100 nm |
|
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUV) |
> 1.0 µm |
|
Multivariant Vesicles |
> 1.0 µm |
B. Based on Lipid Composition
The composition of the liposome determines its functionality, stability, and suitability for specific drug delivery applications.
Table 4: Types of Liposomes Based on Lipid Composition
|
Type |
Application |
Examples of Lipids |
|
Conventional Liposomes |
General drug delivery |
Neutral or negatively charged lipids: phospholipid lecithin, glycerol, fatty acids |
|
pH-Sensitive Liposomes |
pH-triggered intracellular delivery |
Phosphatidyl ethanolamine, dioleoyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine |
|
Cationic Liposomes (Lipoplexes) |
Delivery of negatively charged macromolecules (e.g., DNA) |
DOTAP, DOTMA (cationic lipids) |
|
Stealth (PEGylated) Liposomes |
Prolonged circulation and immune evasion |
Synthetic polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) |
|
Immunoliposomes |
Targeted delivery through antibody binding |
Antibody-conjugated conventional liposomes |
|
Magnetic Liposomes |
Site-specific release using external magnetic fields |
Phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, aldehydes, magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles |
|
Temperature-Sensitive Liposomes |
Triggered drug release in response to temperature changes |
Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine |
C. Based on Method of Preparation
Several techniques have been developed to prepare liposomes, each affecting the vesicle size, lamellarity, and entrapment efficiency.
Table 5: Methods of Liposome Preparation
|
Method Type |
Technique/Process |
Instruments/Tools Used |
|
Mechanical Dispersion |
Co-dissolution of lipids in organic solvent, followed by solvent evaporation |
Hand shaking, non-hand shaking |
|
Sonication to reduce vesicle size |
Probe or bath sonicator |
|
|
Micro-emulsification for uniform vesicle formation |
Microfluidizer pump |
|
|
Extrusion for controlled vesicle size |
Extruder |
|
|
Solvent Dispersion |
Lipids dissolved in organic solvent, added to aqueous phase with drug |
|
|
Ethanol injection (miscible solvent) |
Fine needle |
|
|
Ether injection (immiscible solvent) |
Fine needle |
|
|
Rapid solvent exchange technique |
Narrow needle |
|
|
De-Emulsification |
Breakdown of large vesicles with ability to reassemble |
Reverse-phase evaporation technique (evaporator) |
|
Detergent Removal |
Formation of micelles, followed by detergent removal |
Dialysis membranes, column chromatography |
Niosomes
Niosomes are vesicular drug delivery systems formed from non-ionic surfactants, often considered as alternatives to liposomes. These vesicles are composed primarily of surfactants like fatty alcohols, esters, or block copolymers, along with cholesterol to stabilize the structure.44,45 The surfactants used in niosomal formulations have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions, enabling them to self-assemble into bilayered vesicles. Based on the nature of their head groups, surfactants can be classified as anionic, cationic, amphoteric, or non-ionic. Among these, non-ionic surfactants are preferred due to their low toxicity, greater stability, and enhanced biocompatibility.46
Table 6: Examples of Niosomes Prepared by Thin Film Hydration Technique
|
Preparation Method |
Excipients Used |
Drug/Compound |
|
Thin film hydration (sonication) |
Tween 80, Tween 20, phosphate buffer (pH 7), cholesterol |
Curcumin47 |
|
Thin film hydration |
Chloroform, methanol, Span 80, dicetyl phosphate |
Curcumin48 |
|
Reverse phase evaporation |
Span 60, DMSO, cholesterol |
Growth factor49 |
|
Thin film hydration (rotary evaporator) |
GMS, cholesterol, glucose, sodium chloride, Tween 80, MYRJ 49 |
Ginkgolide50 |
Advantages of Niosomes
Limitations of Niosomes
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs) are developed to address limitations of traditional colloidal drug delivery systems such as liposomes, emulsions, and polymeric nanoparticles. SLNs are composed of physiological lipids—including triglycerides and glycerides of fatty acids—which provide excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility.51
These systems offer several advantages over earlier nanoparticle technologies, such as:
Key Ingredients Used in SLN Formulation
(Figure 4: Illustration of Different Methods for SLN Preparation)
Various preparation techniques for SLNs include:
Figure 4.
Methods of preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs) are emerging as a promising drug delivery system to overcome the limitations of conventional colloidal carriers like emulsions, polymeric nanoparticles, and liposomes. They are formulated using physiological lipids (e.g., glycerides, fatty acids), ensuring biocompatibility, biodegradability, and reduced toxicity. SLNs provide enhanced drug entrapment efficiency, physical stability, and easier scalability in pharmaceutical manufacturing.51
A. High-Pressure Homogenization (HPH)
High-pressure homogenization is a widely used industrial method for SLN production. It involves forcing the lipid phase through a narrow gap at high pressure, which leads to particle size reduction. The method is divided into:
I. Hot Homogenization Method
In this approach, the lipid is melted above its melting point, and the drug is dissolved in the molten lipid. The lipid phase is then mixed with a hot aqueous phase containing surfactants, forming a pre-emulsion. The mixture is then homogenized at high pressure to form SLNs.53
II. Cold Homogenization Method
For heat-sensitive drugs, cold homogenization is preferred. Here, the drug-lipid mixture is first solidified using liquid nitrogen or dry ice, then ground into a fine powder and dispersed in a cold aqueous surfactant solution. This dispersion is homogenized at or below room temperature.53
Table 7: Examples of SLNs Prepared Using HPH Techniques
|
Method |
Drug |
Excipients |
Application |
|
Hot HPH |
Eucalyptus globulus oil |
Cocoa butter, sesame oil, olive oil, L-α phosphatidylcholine |
Wound healing53 |
|
Cold HPH |
Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide |
Poloxamer 188, sodium taurocholate, stearic acid, GMS, HPMC |
Antitubercular action54 |
|
Hot HPH |
Zataria multiflora oil |
Stearic acid, Tween 80, Span 60, ethanol |
Mosquito repellant55 |
|
Cold HPH |
Streptomycin sulphate |
Soy lecithin, GMS, PEG 400/600, Gelucire 44/14 |
Anti-TB activity56 |
|
Hot HPH |
Curcumin |
Compritol 888 ATO, Soy lecithin (Phospholipon 90 G) |
Wound healing57 |
B. Solvent Evaporation/Emulsification Method
In this method, lipophilic materials are dissolved in an organic solvent and emulsified in an aqueous phase to form an oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion. Mechanical stirring facilitates solvent evaporation, leading to lipid precipitation as solid nanoparticles. The polarity of the organic and aqueous phases must be opposite for successful emulsion formation.58,59
Table 8: Examples of SLNs Prepared by Solvent Evaporation Method
|
Drug / Compound |
Excipients |
Application |
|
Curcumin |
Poloxamer 188, Tween 80, GMS, PEG-400, Ethanol |
Treatment of COPD60 |
|
Naloxone |
Glyceryl monostearate, Pluronic 127, Tween 80 |
Opioid overdose reversal61 |
|
Perphenazine |
Tween 80, Soy lecithin, Acetonitrile, Methanol, GMS |
Antipsychotic62 |
|
Amphotericin-B |
Pluronic F127, Vitamin B12, FITC, Stearic acid, Solutol HS15, etc. |
Antileishmanial activity63 |
|
Glibenclamide |
Precirol, Compritol, PEG |
Hypoglycemic effect64 |
|
Olmesartan medoxomil |
GMS, Soy phosphatidylcholine, Tween 80 |
Antihypertensive65 |
Limitations of Solvent Evaporation Method
C. Solvent Emulsification Diffusion Technique
This method involves forming a suspension from a partially water-miscible emulsion, followed by diffusion of the solvent into the aqueous phase, leading to precipitation of lipid nanoparticles. Solvents commonly used include ethyl acetate, butyl lactate, benzyl alcohol, isopropyl acetate, etc. The miscibility of the solvent in water is a critical factor in this method.
Figure 6: Illustration of Solvent Emulsification Diffusion Process
Table 9: SLNs Prepared by Solvent Emulsification Diffusion
|
Drug |
Excipients |
Application |
|
Tretinoin gel |
GMS, Compritol 888 ATO, Cutina CBS, Epikuron 200, Tween 20, Tween 80 |
Treatment of acne68 |
|
Povidone-iodine gel |
GMS, Soy lecithin, Pluronic F68, Carbopol 940, Propylene glycol |
Antiseptic for wound healing69 |
|
Rutin |
Phospholipon 80H, Tween 80, Trehalose, Ethanol, Acetate (2:1) |
Antioxidant therapy70 |
|
Folate-conjugated Olaparib NP |
PEG 4000, Stannous octoate, DCC, NHS |
Targeted anticancer therapy |
Mechanism:
The process begins with the addition of the organic phase into the aqueous phase, resulting in the formation of an oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion. This emulsion is then diluted with water. Under continuous stirring by a mechanical agitator, the drug dissolved in the organic solvent rapidly solidifies as the organic solvent diffuses from the dispersed droplets into the surrounding aqueous phase. This solvent diffusion leads to the formation of hollow spherical nanoparticles (illustrated in Figures 7 and 8).
Figure 7.
Mechanism of Sphere particle formation by solvent emulsification diffusion technique
Figure 8.
Process of solvent emulsification diffusion method for SLN or NLC
CONCLUSION
Novel drug delivery systems have emerged as promising nanoplatforms to enhance the efficiency of drug delivery. Lipid-based nanoformulations offer significant benefits, particularly in improving the low aqueous solubility of poorly soluble drugs. These lipid-based systems also contribute to increased bioavailability, especially for drugs subject to extensive metabolism. Various techniques have been developed and applied for the formulation and evaluation of lipid-based dosage forms, including liposomes, niosomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), nanostructured lipid carriers, and nanocholates. These advanced delivery systems effectively address challenges related to both solubility and permeability of poorly soluble drugs, thereby enhancing therapeutic outcomes.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with this work.
REFERENCE
Madhu I. Kalasad*, Veeresh M. Ganjigatti, Nida Ali, Zulekha Yasmeen Mohammed Abdul Muqeen, Sagar Hire, Dr. Prashant Chavan, Design, Formulation, And Pharmacological Evaluation of Novel Lipid-Based Nanocarriers for Targeted Delivery of Synthesized Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 9, 2768-2780 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17189850
10.5281/zenodo.17189850