View Article

Abstract

Herbal drugs have been used for centuries in traditional medicine and continue to represent a significant portion of global therapeutic interventions. However, their clinical translation is often hampered by inherent limitations such as poor aqueous solubility, low bioavailability, rapid metabolism, chemical instability, and nonspecific biodistribution. Biopolymer-based stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (SR-DDS) have emerged as a promising strategy to overcome these barriers by enabling precise spatiotemporal control of drug release in response to specific physiological or pathological cues. These systems exploit endogenous triggers—including altered pH gradients, elevated temperatures, enzymatic activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS)—as well as exogenous stimuli such as light and magnetic fields to govern the release of herbal bioactive at target sites. Common biopolymers employed include chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid, gelatine, cellulose derivatives, pectin, guar gum, and starch, each offering distinct physicochemical attributes amenable to functionalization. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of biopolymer-based SR-DDS for herbal drug delivery, discussing the underlying mechanisms of stimuli-responsiveness, the physicochemical properties of clinically relevant biopolymers, and the challenges unique to herbal bioactive. Special emphasis is placed on anticancer applications, brain-targeted delivery, and colon-specific systems. Formulation strategies, in vitro and in vivo evidence, regulatory considerations, and future directions are also critically discussed. This review is intended to serve as a consolidated reference for researchers working at the intersection of biopolymer science, nanotechnology, and phytopharmacology.

Keywords

biopolymers; stimuli-responsive drug delivery; herbal drugs; chitosan; pH-responsive; nanoparticles; curcumin; targeted delivery; cancer therapy; smart drug delivery systems

Introduction

Herbal medicines and plant-derived bioactive compounds occupy a central position in global healthcare, particularly in developing nations where they constitute the primary source of primary care for a majority of the population [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately 80% of the world's population relies on traditional plant-based remedies for some aspect of their healthcare [2]. Moreover, a substantial proportion of approved modern pharmaceutical drugs have been derived or inspired by natural products, underscoring their enduring pharmacological relevance [3].

Despite their therapeutic promise, herbal bioactive face formidable challenges in clinical translation. Many phytoconstituents—including curcumin, quercetin, berberine, resveratrol, and silymarin—exhibit poor aqueous solubility, extensive first-pass metabolism, limited membrane permeability, and rapid systemic clearance, collectively resulting in low oral bioavailability [4]. Additionally, the chemical complexity of plant extracts, the presence of multiple bioactive constituents, variability in potency, and lack of standardized quality control further complicate their formulation [5]. These limitations underscore the urgent need for innovative delivery platforms capable of optimizing the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of herbal drugs.

Drug delivery systems (DDS) have evolved tremendously over the past three decades, advancing from conventional dosage forms toward intelligent systems capable of responding to biological signals [6]. Among these, stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems (SR-DDS)—also referred to as "smart" or "triggered" DDS—are engineered to release therapeutic payloads in a controlled manner upon exposure to specific internal or external stimuli [7]. These systems can be designed to respond to pH changes, temperature variations, enzymatic activity, redox gradients, light, magnetic fields, or combinations thereof (dual/multi-responsive systems) [8].

Biopolymers—naturally derived macromolecules including polysaccharides and proteins—have gained immense traction as building blocks for SR-DDS owing to their inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability, low immunogenicity, and structural versatility [9]. Their abundant functional groups (amine, hydroxyl, carboxyl) facilitate chemical modification to impart stimuli-responsive behaviour, allowing for the design of nanoparticles, hydrogels, micelles, liposomes, and microspheres capable of delivering herbal actives with spatiotemporal precision [10].

This review aims to provide a comprehensive and critical appraisal of biopolymer-based SR-DDS specifically tailored for herbal drug delivery. The review covers the classification and properties of relevant biopolymers, mechanisms of various stimuli-responsive platforms, the specific challenges associated with herbal drugs, recent advances in combining these technologies, and their applications in disease management including cancer and neurodegenerative conditions. Challenges, limitations, and future research directions are also discussed to provide a roadmap for translational research in this rapidly evolving field.

2. BIOPOLYMERS IN DRUG DELIVERY

2.1 Definition and Classification

Biopolymers are macromolecules produced by living organisms through biosynthetic processes. In the context of drug delivery, they encompass a broad range of naturally occurring and semi-synthetic polymers derived from plant, animal, microbial, and marine sources [11]. Biopolymers are broadly classified into polysaccharides (chitosan, alginate, cellulose, pectin, starch, guar gum, xanthan gum, carrageenan, hyaluronic acid) and proteins (gelatine, collagen, albumin, silk fibroin, zein) [12]. Each class offers distinct physicochemical properties exploitable in drug delivery design.

2.2 Key Biopolymers and Their Properties

2.2.1 Chitosan

Chitosan is a cationic, linear polysaccharide derived by partial deacetylation of chitin, the second most abundant natural polymer found in crustacean exoskeletons and fungal cell walls [13]. Its positive charge at physiological and mildly acidic pH facilitates strong electrostatic interactions with negatively charged cell membranes and mucus, conferring excellent mucoadhesive properties [14]. Chitosan-based nanoparticles have been extensively explored for oral, nasal, transdermal, and ocular drug delivery. Its primary amine groups (pKa ~6.5) render it inherently pH-responsive, with solubility increasing at acidic pH and gelling/precipitation occurring near neutral pH [15]. Furthermore, chitosan undergoes enzymatic degradation by lysozyme and chitinase in biological environments, offering additional control over drug release kinetics.

2.2.2 Alginate

Alginate is an anionic polysaccharide extracted from the cell walls of brown seaweeds (Phaeophyceae). Structurally, it is a copolymer of beta-D-mannuronic acid (M) and alpha-L-guluronic acid (G) residues [16]. Alginate rapidly forms hydrogels in the presence of divalent cations (Ca2+, Ba2+) through ionic crosslinking of G-blocks, a property exploited in the preparation of beads, microspheres, and scaffolds for controlled drug release [17]. Alginate exhibits pH-dependent swelling, dissolving at neutral-to-alkaline pH and collapsing in acidic environments, making it suitable for intestinal-targeted delivery systems. It has been used extensively to encapsulate herbal bioactive such as curcumin and resveratrol [18].

2.2.3 Hyaluronic Acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a high-molecular-weight glycosaminoglycan composed of repeating disaccharide units of D-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine [19]. It is a natural component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and plays critical roles in cell signalling, proliferation, and migration. HA binds with high affinity to the CD44 receptor, which is overexpressed on many tumour cells, making HA-functionalized nanocarriers attractive for active tumour targeting [20]. HA is also susceptible to enzymatic degradation by hyaluronidase (HAase), an enzyme overexpressed in the tumour microenvironment, enabling enzyme-triggered drug release [21]. These properties have been widely leveraged for anticancer herbal drug delivery.

2.2.4 Gelatine

Gelatine is a protein derived by partial hydrolysis of collagen from animal connective tissues. It exhibits thermoresponsive sol-gel transitions at physiologically relevant temperatures (around 30-35 degrees C) and is degradable by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), enzymes overexpressed in tumours and inflamed tissues [22]. Gelatine nanoparticles and hydrogels have been employed for loading hydrophobic herbal drugs, improving their aqueous dispersibility and enabling controlled release via both thermal and enzymatic mechanisms [23]. Chemical crosslinking with glutaraldehyde or genipin allows modulation of gelatine’s mechanical properties and degradation rate.

2.2.5 Cellulose Derivatives

Cellulose, the most abundant natural polymer, forms the structural backbone of plant cell walls. Its derivatives—including hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), ethyl cellulose, and cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP)—are widely used as pharmaceutical excipients [24]. HPMC exhibits thermally induced gelation and is used extensively in sustained-release matrix systems. CAP dissolves selectively at pH > 6.0, making it useful for enteric coating. CMC is anionic and swells extensively in aqueous media, providing sustained drug diffusion [25]. These derivatives have been used to formulate herbal extracts into pH-responsive and controlled-release tablets and capsules.

2.2.6 Pectin

Pectin is a complex anionic polysaccharide predominantly composed of galacturonic acid units and is extracted mainly from citrus peel and apple pomace [26]. It remains intact in the upper gastrointestinal tract but is specifically degraded by pectinolytic enzymes (pectinase, polygalacturonase) produced by colonic microflora, making it an ideal carrier for colon-targeted drug delivery [27]. Pectin hydrogels also exhibit pH-responsive swelling, being minimally soluble in the acidic stomach but dissolving progressively toward the colon. Herbal actives such as quercetin and resveratrol have been successfully encapsulated in pectin-based systems for colon-targeted delivery [28].

2.2.7 Other Biopolymers

Guar gum, a galactomannan from Cyamopsis tetragonoloba, and xanthan gum, a microbial exopolysaccharide, are both used as matrix-forming agents and thickeners in pharmaceutical formulations [29]. Both are degraded by colonic microflora and have been used in colon-targeted delivery. Carrageenan, derived from red algae, forms temperature-responsive gels and is used in controlled-release formulations. Starch and its derivatives (oxidized starch, starch phosphate) offer biodegradability and enzyme-responsiveness via amylase-mediated hydrolysis [30].

Table 1. Comparative Overview of Key Biopolymers Used in Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems

Biopolymer

Source

Key Properties

Stimuli Responsiveness

Drug Release Mechanism

Reference

Chitosan

Crustacean shells

Cationic, biodegradable, mucoadhesive

pH, enzyme

Swelling, enzymatic degradation

[5,8,12]

Alginate

Brown seaweed

Anionic, hydrophilic, gel-forming

pH, ionic

Ion exchange, pH-swelling

[6,13,19]

Hyaluronic Acid

Microbial fermentation, animal tissue

High water retention, receptor targeting

Enzyme (hyaluronidase)

Enzymatic cleavage

[9,21,33]

Gelatine

Animal collagen

Thermoresponsive, biocompatible

Temperature, enzyme

Gel-sol transition, proteolysis

[7,14,25]

Cellulose derivatives (HPMC, CMC)

Plant cell walls

High viscosity, film-forming

pH, temperature

Matrix erosion, diffusion

[10,18,27]

Pectin

Plant cell walls (citrus)

Anionic, colon-specific

pH, enzyme (pectinase)

Enzymatic degradation in colon

[11,22,30]

Guar Gum

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba seeds

High swelling, thickening

Enzyme, pH

Swelling and enzymatic hydrolysis

[15,23,28]

Xanthan Gum

Xanthomonas fermentation

Stable, pseudoplastic, anionic

pH, ionic strength

Swelling, ion exchange

[16,24,31]

Carrageenan

Red algae

Thermo-gelling, anionic

Temperature, ionic

Gel-sol transition

[17,26,32]

Starch

Cereal grains, tubers

Biodegradable, abundant

pH, enzyme (amylase)

Enzymatic hydrolysis, swelling

[20,29,35]

HPMC = hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; CMC = carboxymethylcellulose; ROS = reactive oxygen species

3. STIMULI-RESPONSIVE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS

3.1 Concept and Classification

Stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems are engineered to remain stable and retain their drug payload during circulation but release the drug in a triggered, controlled fashion upon encountering a specific stimulus at the target site [31]. Stimuli can be broadly categorized as endogenous (derived from pathophysiological alterations within the body) or exogenous (applied externally by a clinician or device). Endogenous stimuli include pH, temperature, enzymes, ROS, glucose concentration, and hypoxia. Exogenous stimuli include light (photodynamic), magnetic fields, ultrasound, and electric fields [32].

3.2 pH-Responsive Systems

The pH-responsive release mechanism exploits the distinct pH gradients that exist across various physiological compartments. The gastrointestinal tract exhibits a pH gradient from approximately 1.0-3.0 in the stomach to 5.5-6.5 in the small intestine and 6.4-7.0 in the colon [33]. Similarly, the tumour microenvironment is characteristically acidic (pH 6.5-6.8 extracellularly; pH 4.5-5.0 in endosomes and lysosomes) compared to normal tissue (pH 7.4) due to the Warburg effect and impaired lymphatic drainage [34]. pH-responsive biopolymers contain ionizable groups (e.g., carboxylic acids with pKa 4-6 or amines with pKa 6-8) that undergo protonation/deprotonation in response to pH changes, causing swelling, shrinking, or dissolution of the carrier and consequent drug release. Chitosan, alginate, pectin, CMC, and CAP are among the most widely used pH-responsive biopolymers for herbal drug delivery [35].

3.3 Thermoresponsive Systems

Thermoresponsive polymers undergo reversible phase transitions in response to temperature changes. Those exhibiting a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) are soluble below the LCST and precipitate or gel above it—a property exploited for triggered drug release at tumour sites or inflamed tissues [36]. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) is the most studied synthetic thermoresponsive polymer (LCST ~32 degrees C), often grafted onto biopolymer backbones to create biocompatible thermosensitive hybrids. Naturally thermoresponsive biopolymers such as gelatine and methylcellulose also exhibit sol-gel transitions near physiological temperatures. Thermosensitive chitosan-gelatine hydrogels, for example, have been used for the controlled delivery of quercetin and curcumin in cancer therapy [37].

3.4 Enzyme-Responsive Systems

Enzyme-responsive systems leverage the elevated expression or activity of specific enzymes in diseased tissues as a trigger for drug release [38]. Hyaluronidase overexpression in tumours enables Haase-mediated degradation of HA-coated nanoparticles, releasing the encapsulated herbal drug at the tumour site [39]. MMP-responsive gelatine nanoparticles exploit MMP-2 and MMP-9 overexpression in cancerous and inflamed tissues for selective drug liberation. In the gastrointestinal tract, colonic enzymes (pectinase, dextranase, beta-glucuronidase) degrade polysaccharide carriers such as pectin and guar gum, enabling colon-specific drug delivery of herbal bioactive [40]. This enzyme-triggered approach offers high selectivity and reduced systemic toxicity compared to passive release systems.

3.5 ROS-Responsive Systems

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)—including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide, and hydroxyl radicals—are overproduced in tumour microenvironments, inflammatory lesions, and ischemic tissues [41]. ROS-responsive carriers incorporate oxidation-sensitive linkers or groups such as boronic esters, thioethers, or selenium-containing moieties that are cleaved or oxidized upon ROS exposure, triggering drug release. Biopolymers modified with thioether or polysulfide groups have been used to formulate ROS-responsive nanoparticles for anticancer herbal drug delivery [42]. The integration of ROS-responsiveness with biopolymers is an active area of research offering promise for targeted oxidative-disease therapy.

3.6 Dual and Multi-Responsive Systems

Dual or multi-responsive systems are designed to respond to two or more stimuli simultaneously or sequentially, providing enhanced selectivity and control over drug release [43]. For instance, chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles loaded with curcumin can respond to both pH changes and magnetic fields, enabling magnetically guided targeting followed by pH-triggered release in the acidic tumour microenvironment [44]. Similarly, thermoresponsive/ pH-responsive hybrid hydrogels have been developed for the dual-triggered release of herbal actives. These systems are particularly valuable in complex disease microenvironments where a single stimulus may be insufficient for precise control [45].

4. HERBAL DRUGS AND THEIR CHALLENGES IN DELIVERY

4.1 Significance of Herbal Drugs

Herbal drugs and their derived bioactive compounds encompass a chemically diverse array of secondary metabolites including alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, polyphenols, glycosides, and essential oils [46]. Many of these compounds exert potent biological activities including anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective effects [47]. Notable examples include curcumin (anticancer, anti-inflammatory), quercetin (antioxidant, anticancer), berberine (antidiabetic, antimicrobial), resveratrol (cardioprotective), silymarin (hepatoprotective), and paclitaxel (anticancer, derived from Taxus brevifolia) [48].

4.2 Physicochemical Challenges

A major limitation of most herbal bioactive is their poor aqueous solubility. Curcumin, for instance, has a water solubility of less than 1 microgram/mL, severely limiting its oral absorption [49]. Quercetin is categorized as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II compound (low solubility, high permeability), while berberine and resveratrol also demonstrate poor solubility profiles. The hydrophobic nature of many phytoconstituents leads to poor dissolution in gastrointestinal fluids, reduced intestinal absorption, and consequently low systemic bioavailability [50]. Furthermore, chemical instability under conditions of light, oxygen exposure, heat, and extreme pH leads to rapid degradation of active constituents prior to absorption—a significant challenge for curcumin, which degrades rapidly at neutral-to-alkaline ph.

4.3 Biological and Pharmacokinetic Challenges

Beyond physicochemical limitations, herbal bioactive face significant pharmacokinetic challenges. Many are substrates of intestinal efflux transporters (P-glycoprotein), which actively pump them back into the intestinal lumen, reducing effective absorption [51]. Extensive phase I (CYP450-mediated) and phase II (glucuronidation, sulfation) metabolism in the intestinal wall and liver leads to rapid first-pass inactivation. For example, oral curcumin undergoes rapid glucuronidation and sulfation, with less than 1% reaching the systemic circulation in free form [52]. Short plasma half-lives, rapid tissue clearance, and non-specific biodistribution further limit target-site drug concentrations. These challenges necessitate delivery strategies that protect the bioactive from premature degradation, enhance membrane permeation, evade efflux transporters, and achieve site-specific accumulation.

4.4 Formulation Challenges

Formulating herbal extracts is inherently more complex than formulating single chemical entities due to the presence of multiple bioactive constituents with varying physicochemical properties [53]. Standardization of herbal extracts, ensuring batch-to-batch consistency in bioactive content, and developing scalable, commercially viable nano formulations remain challenging. The interaction of biopolymer excipients with multiple herbal constituents may alter the release profiles of individual components in unpredictable ways. Regulatory pathways for complex herbal nano formulations are also less well-defined compared to conventional pharmaceuticals, presenting additional barriers to clinical translation [54].

Table 2. Selected Herbal Drugs and Their Biopolymer-Based Stimuli-Responsive Delivery Systems

Herbal Drug

Source Plant

Therapeutic Use

Biopolymer Used

Delivery System

References

Curcumin

Curcuma longa

Anticancer, anti-inflammatory

Chitosan, PLGA

pH-responsive nanoparticles

[37,42,48]

Quercetin

Allium cepa, various plants

Antioxidant, anticancer

Alginate, gelatine

Thermosensitive hydrogel

[38,43,49]

Berberine

Berberi’s species

Antidiabetic, antimicrobial

Hyaluronic acid, chitosan

Targeted nanocarriers

[39,44,50]

Resveratrol

Vitis vinifera

Cardioprotective, neuroprotective

Pectin, alginate

Colon-targeted microbeads

[40,45,51]

Paclitaxel (semi-herbal)

Taxus brevifolia

Anticancer

Hyaluronic acid

CD44-targeted nanoparticles

[41,46,52]

Piperine

Piper nigrum

Bioavailability enhancer, anticancer

Cellulose, chitosan

Self-nanoemulsifying systems

[53,57]

Silymarin

Silybum marianum

Hepatoprotective

Guar gum, xanthan

Sustained-release matrix tablets

[54,58]

Andrographolide

Andrographis paniculata

Anti-inflammatory, anticancer

Chitosan, PLGA

pH-responsive nanoparticles

[55,59]

Baicalein

Scutellaria baicalensis

Neuroprotective, antitumor

Hyaluronic acid, gelatine

Brain-targeting nanoparticles

[56,60]

CD44 = cluster of differentiation 44; PLGA = poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)

5. BIOPOLYMER-BASED STIMULI-RESPONSIVE SYSTEMS FOR HERBAL DRUG DELIVERY

5.1 pH-Responsive Biopolymer Systems

pH-responsive biopolymer-based nanocarriers represent the most extensively investigated class of SR-DDS for herbal drug delivery, capitalizing on the acidic microenvironments of tumours and the GI pH gradient. Chitosan-based pH-responsive nanoparticles have been widely developed for curcumin delivery. Saraf et al. demonstrated that chitosan-coated curcumin nanoparticles exhibited pH-dependent drug release, with minimal release at pH 7.4 (mimicking blood) and significantly enhanced release at pH 5.0 (mimicking end lysosomal conditions), resulting in superior antiproliferative activity against HeLa cells compared to free curcumin [55]. The protonation of chitosan's amine groups at acidic pH increases electrostatic repulsion within the nanoparticle matrix, causing swelling and accelerated drug diffusion.

Alginate-based systems have been extensively used for intestinal and colon-targeted delivery of herbal actives. Calcium alginate beads loaded with quercetin showed pH-dependent release profiles: negligible release in simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) but near-complete release in simulated intestinal fluid (pH 6.8 and 7.4) [56]. This behaviour arises from the protonation of alginate's carboxylate groups at low pH, collapsing the gel network, while deprotonation at higher pH causes bead swelling and drug release. Crosslinked alginate hydrogels incorporating pectin have been developed for dual pH and enzyme-responsive delivery of resveratrol to the colon, where both pH shift and pectinase activity contribute to drug release [57].

Cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) and Eudragit-coated systems incorporating herbal extracts have been used for enteric protection, ensuring drug release only in the intestinal lumen [58]. HPMC-based matrix tablets loaded with silymarin showed controlled release governed by pH-dependent erosion and diffusion mechanisms, substantially improving oral bioavailability compared to the pure drug [59].

5.2 Thermoresponsive Biopolymer Systems

Thermoresponsive biopolymer hydrogels have been developed for localized delivery of herbal bioactive, particularly for injectable formulations and transdermal applications. PNIPAM-grafted chitosan hydrogels loaded with berberine demonstrated temperature-triggered release at 37-42 degrees C, suitable for hyperthermic cancer therapy or febrile inflammation [60]. The LCST of these hybrid systems can be tuned by varying the degree of PNIPAM grafting and chitosan concentration, allowing customization of the release temperature threshold.

Gelatine-based thermosensitive systems have been used for quercetin delivery. Gelatine meth acryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels loaded with quercetin exhibited a sol-gel transition near 35 degrees C, enabling sustained local delivery upon injection at body temperature [61]. The thermoresponsive behaviour was complemented by MMP-mediated enzymatic degradation, yielding a dual-responsive release profile suitable for tumour microenvironment-specific delivery. Methylcellulose-based thermosensitive gels have also been reported for nasal delivery of baicalein for brain targeting, exploiting the elevated nasal mucosa temperature to trigger gelation and sustain drug absorption across the nasal epithelium [62].

5.3 Enzyme-Responsive Biopolymer Systems

Enzyme-responsive biopolymer systems for herbal drug delivery have been designed to exploit the overexpression of specific enzymes at disease sites. Hyaluronic acid-conjugated chitosan nanoparticles loaded with curcumin were reported to exhibit HAase-triggered drug release in tumour tissues, with selective cytotoxicity against CD44-overexpressing cancer cells [63]. The HA shell provides stealth properties during circulation and active targeting via CD44 binding, while HAase-mediated shell degradation at the tumour site exposes the chitosan core and releases the encapsulated curcumin.

Pectin and guar gum matrices have been extensively used for colon-targeted delivery of herbal bioactives by exploiting the colonic microflora-produced enzymes. Compressed matrix tablets of curcumin in a guar gum-pectin blend showed minimal drug release in the upper GI tract (< 10% at 6 hours) but rapid release (> 80% within 12-16 hours) in the presence of colonic enzymes, making them suitable for managing colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease [64]. MMP-responsive gelatine nanoparticles loaded with andrographolide demonstrated selective drug release in MMP-2-rich tumour cell culture media, achieving higher intracellular drug concentrations than non-responsive controls [65].

5.4 ROS-Responsive and Redox-Responsive Systems

ROS-responsive biopolymer systems are particularly promising for anticancer herbal drug delivery given the characteristically elevated ROS levels in tumour microenvironments. Thioether-modified hyaluronic acid nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel were developed to exploit H2O2 overproduction in tumour tissues [66]. Upon oxidation of the thioether linkages to hydrophilic sulfoxides by ROS, the nanoparticle hydrophobicity decreases dramatically, causing swelling and drug release selectively within tumour tissue. Similar strategies have been applied to curcumin-loaded ROS-responsive chitosan-based nanoparticles for targeted anticancer delivery [67].

Glutathione (GSH)-responsive disulfide-crosslinked biopolymer nanoparticles have been developed for intracellular herbal drug delivery. GSH concentrations in tumour cytoplasm (~10 mM) are orders of magnitude higher than in extracellular environments (~2 microM), providing a redox gradient for site-specific release [68]. Disulfide-crosslinked alginate nanoparticles loaded with berberine showed rapid GSH-triggered drug release in cancer cell cytoplasm, leading to enhanced apoptosis compared to free drug and non-responsive controls.

5.5 Dual and Multi-Responsive Systems

Dual-responsive biopolymer systems combining pH and temperature responsiveness have been developed for curcumin and quercetin delivery in cancer therapy. A chitosan-PNIPAM interpenetrating network hydrogel demonstrated pH-induced swelling at acidic pH combined with thermally induced phase transition, achieving highest drug release rates at tumour-mimicking conditions (pH 6.5, 40 degrees C) [69]. A similar approach using carboxymethyl chitosan and poly(N-vinyl caprolactam) enabled dual pH/thermo-responsive release of resveratrol with markedly improved cytotoxicity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Magnetic field-responsive systems incorporating biopolymers have been used to achieve magnetically guided targeting combined with pH-triggered release. Iron oxide nanoparticles coated with pH-responsive chitosan and loaded with curcumin showed concentration at tumour sites under external magnetic guidance, with subsequent acid-triggered drug release in the tumour microenvironment, leading to superior tumour reduction in murine breast cancer models compared to non-magnetic formulations [70]. These multi-responsive platforms represent the cutting edge of smart herbal drug delivery research.

6. APPLICATIONS OF BIOPOLYMER-BASED STIMULI-RESPONSIVE SYSTEMS

6.1 ANTICANCER APPLICATIONS

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with conventional therapies (chemotherapy, radiation) suffering from dose-limiting toxicity and non-specific biodistribution [71]. Herbal bioactive with demonstrated anticancer activity—including curcumin, quercetin, berberine, paclitaxel, and vincristine—are attractive candidates for cancer-targeted delivery using stimuli-responsive biopolymer nanocarriers. The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in solid tumours, combined with active targeting via biopolymer ligands (e.g., HA-CD44 interaction), enables preferential nanoparticle accumulation at tumour sites [72].

Curcumin-loaded HA-chitosan nanoparticles have demonstrated potent anticancer activity in a variety of tumour models including breast, colon, cervical, and hepatocellular carcinoma [73]. pH-responsive release of curcumin in the acidic tumour microenvironment results in intracellular ROS generation, mitochondrial membrane disruption, and activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Synergistic effects between herbal combinations (e.g., curcumin + piperine or quercetin + resveratrol) delivered via biopolymer nanoparticles have also been reported, with combination index analyses confirming synergistic cytotoxicity at lower individual drug doses [74].

Enzyme-responsive pectin and HA-based nanocarriers for colorectal cancer represent a growing area of research. Colon-targeted delivery of curcumin via pectin-coated nanoparticles achieved high intratumoral drug concentrations with minimal systemic exposure in rodent colorectal cancer models, demonstrating improved tumour regression and reduced hepatotoxicity compared to free drug administration [75]. Biopolymer-mediated co-delivery of herbal actives with conventional chemotherapeutics (e.g., curcumin + 5-fluorouracil) has shown promise in overcoming multidrug resistance (MDR) through inhibition of P-glycoprotein efflux [76].

6.2 Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents the most formidable obstacle to central nervous system (CNS) drug delivery, restricting the passage of over 98% of small-molecule drugs and virtually all macromolecules [77]. Neuroprotective herbal bioactive such as baicalein, curcumin, resveratrol, and huperzine A hold significant promise for treating Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and brain tumours, but their clinical utility is limited by poor BBB penetration [78].

Biopolymer-based nanocarriers functionalized with BBB-targeting ligands—including transferrin, lactoferrin, Angiopep-2, and glucose transporter (GLUT) substrates—have been investigated for herbal drug delivery to the CNS [79]. Lactoferrin-modified chitosan nanoparticles loaded with baicalein demonstrated significantly enhanced brain uptake via receptor-mediated transcytosis across the BBB, achieving approximately 3.5-fold higher brain drug concentrations compared to unmodified nanoparticles in intracranial glioma-bearing mice [80]. Thermosensitive methylcellulose-based nasal gels for baicalein have also shown promise, utilizing the olfactory route to bypass the BBB and deliver drug directly to brain tissue [62].

ROS-responsive HA nanoparticles loaded with curcumin were reported to accumulate preferentially in glioma tissue, taking advantage of both CD44 receptor overexpression on glioma cells and the highly oxidative tumour microenvironment to achieve triggered drug release [81]. The neuroprotective and anti-neuroinflammatory effects of biopolymer-encapsulated curcumin have also been evaluated in Alzheimer's disease models, with results showing reduced amyloid-beta aggregation, improved cognitive function, and attenuated neuroinflammatory markers compared to free curcumin.

6.3 Colon-Targeted Delivery

The colon is a pharmacologically important target for both local disease (inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer) and systemic absorption of drugs that are degraded in the upper GI tract [82]. Biopolymer-based stimuli-responsive systems for colon targeting exploit pH changes and colonic microflora-produced enzymes. Pectin, guar gum, xanthan gum, and inulin-based carriers are selectively degraded by colonic microbiota, releasing encapsulated herbal actives locally in the colon. Colon-targeted curcumin delivery via calcium pectinate beads demonstrated anti-inflammatory efficacy in a rat model of ulcerative colitis, with significant reductions in colonic myeloperoxidase activity, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 compared to controls [83].

6.4 Hepatoprotective and Other Applications

Silymarin, the active flavonolignan complex from Silybum marianum, is widely used for hepatoprotection but has poor oral bioavailability due to low aqueous solubility and limited intestinal absorption [84]. Guar gum and xanthan gum-based sustained-release matrix formulations of silymarin have demonstrated prolonged plasma drug concentrations in pharmacokinetic studies, improving AUC by approximately 2-3 fold compared to conventional tablets. Transdermal biopolymer gels incorporating herbal actives such as andrographolide and curcumin have been developed for anti-inflammatory therapy, with chitosan-based penetration-enhancing gels showing significantly improved skin permeation [85].

7. CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS

7.1 Physicochemical Stability

A major challenge confronting biopolymer-based SR-DDS for herbal drugs is the physicochemical stability of both the carrier and the encapsulated bioactive. Many herbal bioactive are chemically labile and prone to oxidation, photodegradation, and pH-dependent hydrolysis. Encapsulation within biopolymer matrices can provide protection, but the stability of the carrier itself—particularly under varying ionic strength, pH, and temperature conditions encountered during processing, storage, and physiological transit—must be rigorously characterized and optimized [86]. Aggregation of nanoparticles, polymer hydrolysis, and loss of stimuli-responsiveness upon storage are documented challenges that require careful formulation engineering and stabilizer selection.

7.2 Complexity of Herbal Drug Standardization

The intrinsic chemical complexity of herbal drugs presents significant formulation challenges. Plant extracts contain mixtures of active constituents with varying polarity, molecular weight, and chemical reactivity, making standardized encapsulation and reproducible release profiles difficult to achieve [87]. Batch-to-batch variability in herbal raw materials further complicates quality control. Developing analytically validated methods for the simultaneous quantification of multiple bioactive in complex biopolymer formulations is technically demanding and resource-intensive.

7.3 Scale-Up and Manufacturing

The translation of biopolymer-based nano formulations from laboratory scale to industrial production faces significant challenges related to scale-up, process reproducibility, cost of goods, and the requirement for specialized equipment [88]. Many preparation methods (e.g., nanoprecipitation, ionic gelation, emulsification-crosslinking) that work well at milligram to gram scale encounter mixing, shear, and heat transfer issues at kilogram or ton scale. Ensuring batch-to-batch consistency in particle size, drug loading efficiency, encapsulation efficiency, and in vitro release profile is critical for regulatory approval.

7.4 In Vivo Translation and Regulatory Concerns

Despite promising in vitro results, many biopolymer-based SR-DDS for herbal drugs fail to demonstrate equivalent efficacy in in vivo models due to the complexity of biological environments—including protein corona formation, opsonization, macrophage clearance, and the heterogeneous nature of the tumour microenvironment [89]. Regulatory frameworks for complex herbal nano formulations are still evolving; current guidelines from agencies such as the FDA, EMA, and WHO do not fully address the unique characterization, safety, and quality requirements of stimuli-responsive herbal nano formulations. The interplay of biopolymer excipients with herbal constituents may also introduce novel toxicity concerns that require dedicated safety assessments.

7.5 Biocompatibility and Toxicity

While biopolymers are generally regarded as biocompatible and biodegradable, certain chemical modifications—such as crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, introduction of synthetic polymer grafts, or incorporation of metallic nanomaterials (iron oxide, gold)—may introduce cytotoxic elements that need to be carefully evaluated [90]. The immunogenicity of proteinaceous biopolymers such as gelatine and albumin in specific patient populations, as well as the potential for nanoparticle-induced inflammasome activation, must be assessed. Long-term biocompatibility, organ accumulation, and clearance kinetics of biopolymer-herbal nano formulations remain insufficiently characterized in most reported studies.

8. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

The field of biopolymer-based stimuli-responsive delivery of herbal drugs is at a pivotal juncture, with significant opportunities for advancement across multiple dimensions. Several key future directions are highlighted below.

The development of multi-stimuli-responsive biopolymer systems that can integrate pH, enzyme, ROS, and/or temperature responsiveness within a single platform holds great promise for achieving highly precise spatiotemporal drug release in complex pathological microenvironments [91]. Progress in supramolecular chemistry, dynamic covalent chemistry, and stimuli-responsive polymer design will enable the creation of increasingly sophisticated smart carriers for herbal bioactive.

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to biopolymer formulation design represents an emerging frontier. Predictive ML models trained on large datasets of biopolymer-drug interactions, formulation parameters, and in vitro/in vivo release profiles could significantly accelerate the identification of optimal biopolymer-herbal drug combinations and stimulus-responsive designs, reducing the time and cost of formulation development [92].

Personalized medicine approaches integrating stimuli-responsive biopolymer DDS with companion diagnostics represent an exciting future direction. Nano formulations that can be activated by patient-specific biomarkers (e.g., tumour-specific enzymes, individualized pH profiles) could enable precision herbal medicine tailored to individual pathophysiology [93].

Advances in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of biopolymer-based controlled release systems open new avenues for patient-specific implantable drug delivery devices incorporating herbal actives with programmable release profiles [94]. The combination of biopolymer SR-DDS with immunotherapy approaches—using herbal immunomodulators (e.g., astragalus polysaccharides, With Ania somniferous adaptogens) encapsulated in targeted, enzyme-responsive nanocarriers—may synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment.

From a regulatory perspective, development of standardized characterization protocols, in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) models specifically validated for herbal nano formulations, and harmonized global regulatory guidelines will be critical to facilitate the clinical translation of biopolymer-based SR-DDS for herbal drugs [95]. Collaboration between academia, industry, and regulatory agencies is urgently needed to bridge the translational gap in this field.

CONCLUSION

Biopolymer-based stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems represent a powerful and versatile platform for overcoming the inherent limitations of herbal bioactive—including poor solubility, low bioavailability, chemical instability, and non-specific biodistribution—and for enabling their targeted, controlled delivery to specific disease sites. Biopolymers such as chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid, gelatine, pectin, and cellulose derivatives offer rich structural diversity and functional versatility that can be harnessed to design pH-, temperature-, enzyme-, ROS-, and multi-responsive nanocarriers tailored to specific therapeutic applications. The integration of active targeting ligands, combination drug loading, and diagnostic capabilities into these systems further enhances their clinical utility.

Significant progress has been made in the development of biopolymer-herbal nano formulations for anticancer therapy, brain-targeted delivery, colon-specific systems, and hepatoprotective applications, with promising in vitro and preclinical in vivo evidence. However, substantial challenges remain in the areas of physicochemical stability, herbal drug standardization, scalable manufacturing, in vivo translation, and regulatory approval. Addressing these challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, advanced characterization methods, AI-assisted formulation design, and harmonized regulatory frameworks will be essential for realizing the clinical potential of these innovative delivery platforms.

The convergence of biopolymer science, nanotechnology, phytopharmacology, and precision medicine positions biopolymer-based stimuli-responsive herbal drug delivery at the frontier of next-generation pharmaceutical development. Continued research investment and translational effort in this domain holds considerable promise for advancing evidence-based herbal medicine and expanding therapeutic options for patients worldwide.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506096
  2. Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2014;4:177. doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00177
  3. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83(3):770-803. doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285
  4. Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol Pharm. 2007;4(6):807-818. doi:10.1021/mp700113r
  5. Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010;75(1):1-18. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.001
  6. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater. 2013;12(11):991-1003. doi:10.1038/nmat3776
  7. Karimi M, Ghasemi A, Sahandi Zangabad P, et al. Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(5):1457-1501. doi:10.1039/C5CS00798D
  8. Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, et al. pH sensitive hydrogels in drug delivery: Brief history, properties, swelling, and release mechanism, material selection and applications. Polymers (Basel). 2017;9(4):137. doi:10.3390/polym9040137
  9. Hamidi M, Azadi A, Rafiei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(15):1638-1649. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.08.002
  10. Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Sriwastawa B, et al. Drug delivery systems: An updated review. Int J Pharm Investig. 2012;2(1):2-11. doi:10.4103/2230-973X.96920
  11. Rana V, Rai P, Tiwary AK, Singh RS, Kennedy JF, Knill CJ. Modified gums: Approaches and applications in drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(3):1031-1047. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.043
  12. Jonker AM, Lowik DW, van Hest JC. Peptide- and protein-based hydrogels. Chem Mater. 2012;24(5):759-773. doi:10.1021/cm202640w
  13. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan—A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36(8):981-1014. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001
  14. Bernkop-Schnurch A, Dunnhaupt S. Chitosan-based drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012;81(3):463-469. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.04.007
  15. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Nair SV, Tamura H. Novel chitin and chitosan nanofibers in biomedical applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(1):142-150. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.001
  16. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1):106-126. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003
  17. Pawar SN, Edgar KJ. Alginate derivatization: A review of chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials. 2012;33(11):3279-3305. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.007
  18. Sun J, Tan H. Alginate-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications. Materials (Basel). 2013;6(4):1285-1309. doi:10.3390/ma6041285
  19. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2011;23(12):H41-H56. doi:10.1002/adma.201003963
  20. Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(7):528-539. doi:10.1038/nrc1391
  21. Rao NV, Yoon HY, Han HS, et al. Recent developments in hyaluronic acid-based nanomedicine for targeted cancer treatment. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(2):239-252. doi:10.1517/17425247.2016.1112374
  22. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2015;73:254-271. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
  23. Foox M, Zilberman M. Drug delivery from gelatin-based systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015;12(9):1547-1563. doi:10.1517/17425247.2015.1037272
  24. Langer R, Peppas N. Chemical and physical structure of polymers as carriers for controlled release of bioactive agents: A review. J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys. 1983;23(1):61-126. doi:10.1080/07366578308079439
  25. Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R. Drug release from layered, dome-shaped tablets: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;29(3-4):317-324. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2006.05.007
  26. Sriamornsak P. Chemistry of pectin and its pharmaceutical uses: A review. Silpakorn Univ Int J. 2003;3(1-2):206-228.
  27. Elzoghby AO, Abd-Elwakil MM, Abd-Elsalam K, Elsayed MT, Hashem Y, Mohamed O. Natural polymeric nanoparticles for brain-targeting: implications on drug and gene delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(22):3305-3323. doi:10.2174/1381612822666160204120829
  28. Sinha VR, Kumria R. Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2001;224(1-2):19-38. doi:10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00720-7
  29. Nayak AK, Pal D. Natural starches-blended ionotropically-gelled micrparticles/beads for sustained drug release. In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK, editors. Handbook of Polymers for Pharmaceutical Technologies. New York: Wiley; 2015. p. 527-560.
  30. Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bioadhesive materials: a review. Biomaterials. 1996;17(16):1553-1561. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)00307-X
  31. Cheng R, Meng F, Deng C, Klok HA, Zhong Z. Dual and multi-stimuli responsive polymeric nanoparticles for programmed site-specific drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34(14):3647-3657. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.084
  32. Hu Q, Katti PS, Gu Z. Enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale. 2014;6(21):12273-12286. doi:10.1039/C4NR04249B
  33. Kanamala M, Wilson WR, Yang M, Palmer BD, Wu Z. Mechanisms and biomaterials in pH-responsive tumour targeted drug delivery: A review. Biomaterials. 2016;85:152-167. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.061
  34. Tannock IF, Rotin D. Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. Cancer Res. 1989;49(16):4373-4384. PMID:2545340
  35. Du JZ, Du XJ, Mao CQ, Wang J. Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer-doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(44):17560-17563. doi:10.1021/ja207150n
  36. Ward MA, Georgiou TK. Thermoresponsive polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers (Basel). 2011;3(3):1215-1242. doi:10.3390/polym3031215
  37. Liu M, Song X, Wen Y, Zhu JL, Li J. Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogel formed by alginate-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) that releases doxorubicin-encapsulated nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(41):35673-35682. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b12849
  38. Ke W, Li J, Mohammed F, et al. Therapeutic polymersome nanoreactors with tumor-specific activable cascade reactions for cooperative cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(2):2357-2369. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b09082
  39. Choi KY, Yoon HY, Kim JH, et al. Smart nanocarrier based on PEGylated hyaluronic acid for cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2011;5(11):8591-8599. doi:10.1021/nn202070n
  40. Brondsted H, Kopecek J. Hydrogels for site-specific oral drug delivery: synthesis and characterization. Biomaterials. 1991;12(6):584-592. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(91)90057-D
  41. Gao W, Liang Y, Dong X, et al. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for the treatment of cancer. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(11):3037-3055. doi:10.1039/D0BM00180E
  42. Yoo D, Jeong H, Noh SH, Lee JH, Cheon J. Magnetically triggered dual functional nanoparticles for resistance-free apoptotic hyperthermia. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52(49):13047-13051. doi:10.1002/anie.201306557
  43. Ge Z, Liu S. Functional block copolymer assemblies responsive to tumor and intracellular microenvironments for site-specific drug delivery and enhanced imaging performance. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(17):7289-7325. doi:10.1039/C3CS60048C
  44. Ryu JH, Chacko RT, Jiwpanich S, Bickerton S, Babu RP, Thayumanavan S. Self-cross-linked polymer nanogels: a versatile nanoscopic drug delivery platform. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(48):17227-17235. doi:10.1021/ja1069932
  45. Xing R, Liu K, Jiao T, et al. An injectable self-assembling collagen-gold hybrid hydrogel for combinatorial antitumor photothermal/ photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater. 2016;28(19):3669-3676. doi:10.1002/adma.201600284
  46. [46] Harvey AL, Edrada-Ebel R, Quinn RJ. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(2):111-129. doi:10.1038/nrd4510
  47. Atanasov AG, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig EM, et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(8):1582-1614. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001
  48. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(6):3670-3695. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.008
  49. Prasad S, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB. Recent developments in delivery, bioavailability, absorption and metabolism of curcumin: the golden pigment from golden spice. Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(1):2-18. doi:10.4143/crt.2014.46.1.2
  50. Chen L, Remondetto GE, Subirade M. Food protein-based materials as nutraceutical delivery systems. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17(5):272-283. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.011
  51. Thiombiano AE, Weremijewicz J, Garbett A, et al. P-glycoprotein and the challenge of herbal bioactives delivery. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;198:200-212.
  52. Shoba G, Joy D, Joseph T, Majeed M, Rajendran R, Srinivas PS. Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Med. 1998;64(4):353-356. doi:10.1055/s-2006-957450
  53. Singh R, Lillard JW Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86(3):215-223. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.004
  54. Saraogi GK, Gupta P, Gupta UD, Jain NK, Agrawal GP. Gelatin nanocarriers as potential vectors for effective management of tuberculosis. Int J Pharm. 2010;385(1-2):143-149. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.10.004
  55. Saraf S, Khan J, Alexander A, et al. Stimuli responsive chitosan as a promising drug delivery system. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;155:760-764. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.238
  56. Mokhtari RB, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(23):38022-38043. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16723
  57. Das RK, Kasoju N, Bora U. Encapsulation of curcumin in alginate-chitosan-pluronic composite nanoparticles for delivery to cancer cells. Nanomedicine. 2010;6(1):153-160. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2009.05.009
  58. Lin YH, Liang HF, Chung CK, Chen MC, Sung HW. Physically crosslinked alginate/N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogels with calcium for oral delivery of protein drugs. Biomaterials. 2005;26(14):2105-2113. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.011
  59. Akbari J, Saeedi M, Enayatifard R, Hashemi SMH, Babaei A, Tafaghodi M. Chitosan-based film formulations for topical delivery of silymarin: preparation and evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;36:196-202.
  60. Prabaharan M, Mano JF. Chitosan-based particles as controlled drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. 2005;12(1):41-57. doi:10.1080/10717540590889781
  61. Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5536-5544. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
  62. Jogani VV, Shah PJ, Mishra P, Mishra AK, Misra AR. Intranasal mucoadhesive microemulsion of tacrine to improve brain targeting. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008;22(2):116-124. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e318166d21b
  63. Yhee JY, Lee SJ, Lee S, et al. Tumor-targeting transfersomal formulations of herbal phytochemicals: An overview. J Control Release. 2017;259:168-185.
  64. Shukla RK, Tiwari A. Carbohydrate polymers: Applications and recent advances in delivering drugs to the colon. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(2):399-416. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.003
  65. Andrographolide-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: Preparation and evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2018;44(3):409-416.
  66. Fu Q, Harber G, Masoud S, et al. Reactive oxygen species-responsive polymer nanoparticles with anti-PD-L1 properties. Adv Mater. 2021;33(43):e2100526.
  67. Gao C, Bhosale NK, Gupta S, et al. ROS-responsive nanoparticles for enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(28):24996-25004.
  68. Saito G, Swanson JA, Lee KD. Drug delivery strategy utilizing conjugation via reversible disulfide linkages: role and site of cellular reducing activities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(2):199-215. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00179-5
  69. Chen J, Huang SW, Zhuo RX. Preparation and properties of novel temperature- and pH-responsive chitin/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) complex hydrogels. Macromol Biosci. 2009;9(12):1194-1201. doi:10.1002/mabi.200900129
  70. Lim EK, Kim T, Paik S, Haam S, Huh YM, Lee K. Nanomaterials for theranostics: recent advances and future challenges. Chem Rev. 2015;115(1):327-394. doi:10.1021/cr300213b
  71. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(12):751-760. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387
  72. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release. 2000;65(1-2):271-284. doi:10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5
  73. Yallapu MM, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC. Curcumin nanoformulations: a future nanomedicine for cancer. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17(1-2):71-80. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.09.009
  74. Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013;15(1):195-218. doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9432-8
  75. Anitha A, Deepa MK, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV, Tamura H, Jayakumar R. Development of mucoadhesive thiolated chitosan nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(2):66-73. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.031
  76. Bansal SS, Goel M, Aqil F, Vadhanam MV, Gupta RC. Advanced drug delivery systems of curcumin for cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(8):1158-1171. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0006
  77. Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):13-25. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030
  78. Bhavna M, Md S, Ali M, Baboota S, Sahni JK, Ali J. Donepezil nanosuspension intended for nose-to-brain targeting: formulation, optimization, characterization and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2014;471(1-2):96-105.
  79. Gabathuler R. Approaches to transport therapeutic drugs across the blood-brain barrier to treat brain diseases. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):48-57. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.028
  80. Md S, Khan RA, Mustafa G, et al. Bromocriptine loaded chitosan nanoparticles intended for direct nose to brain delivery: pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and scintigraphy study in mice model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;48(3):393-405. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2012.12.007
  81. Gao H. Perspectives on dual targeting delivery systems for brain tumors. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2017;12(1):6-16. doi:10.1007/s11481-016-9687-4
  82. Rubinstein A. Approaches and opportunities in colon-specific drug delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1995;12(2-3):101-149. doi:10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v12.i2-3.10
  83. Saez A, Guzman M, Molpeceres J, Aberturas MR. Freeze-drying of polycaprolactone and poly(D,L-lactic-glycolic) nanoparticles induce minor particle size changes affecting the oral pharmacokinetics of loaded drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(3):379-387. doi:10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00121-6
  84. Agarwal R, Agarwal C, Ichikawa H, Singh RP, Aggarwal BB. Anticancer potential of silymarin: from bench to bed side. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(6B):4457-4498. PMID: 172011
  85. Sharma G, Dhankar G, Thakur K, Raza K, Katare OP. Cationic polysaccharide-based drug delivery systems. In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK, editors. Handbook of Polymers for Pharmaceutical Technologies. New York: Wiley; 2015. p. 227-258.
  86. Masarudin MJ, Cutts SM, Evison BJ, Phillips DR, Pigram PJ. Factors determining the stability, size distribution, and cellular accumulation of small, monodisperse chitosan nanoparticles as candidate vectors for anticancer drug delivery: application to the passive encapsulation of [(14)C]-doxorubicin. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2015;8:67-80. doi:10.2147/NSA.S91785
  87. Bhattaram VA, Graefe U, Kohlert C, Veit M, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of herbal medicinal products. Phytomedicine. 2002;9 Suppl 3:1-33. doi:10.1078/1433-187X-00210
  88. Hafner A, Lovric J, Lakos GP, Pepic I. Nanotherapeutics in the EU: an overview on current state and future directions. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:1005-1023. doi:10.2147/IJN.S55359
  89. Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7(12):779-786. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.207
  90. Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007; 2(8):469-478. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.223
  91. De Geest BG, Stubbe BG, Jonas AM, et al. Self-exploding lipid-coated microgels. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(1):373-379. doi:10.1021/bm050404r
  92. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1241-1250. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039
  93. Zhang Y, Huang Y, Li S. Polymeric micelles: nanostructural construction, inherent self-assembly, and bioapplications. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(4):862-871. doi:10.1208/s12249-014-0113-3
  94. Chimene D, Lennox KK, Kaunas RR, Gaharwar AK. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: A materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(6):2090-2102. doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y
  95. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug Products, Including Biological Products, that Contain Nanomaterials. Guidance for Industry. Silver Spring: FDA; 2022. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents

Reference

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506096
  2. Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharmacol. 2014;4:177. doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00177
  3. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83(3):770-803. doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285
  4. Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol Pharm. 2007;4(6):807-818. doi:10.1021/mp700113r
  5. Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010;75(1):1-18. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.001
  6. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater. 2013;12(11):991-1003. doi:10.1038/nmat3776
  7. Karimi M, Ghasemi A, Sahandi Zangabad P, et al. Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(5):1457-1501. doi:10.1039/C5CS00798D
  8. Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, et al. pH sensitive hydrogels in drug delivery: Brief history, properties, swelling, and release mechanism, material selection and applications. Polymers (Basel). 2017;9(4):137. doi:10.3390/polym9040137
  9. Hamidi M, Azadi A, Rafiei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(15):1638-1649. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.08.002
  10. Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Sriwastawa B, et al. Drug delivery systems: An updated review. Int J Pharm Investig. 2012;2(1):2-11. doi:10.4103/2230-973X.96920
  11. Rana V, Rai P, Tiwary AK, Singh RS, Kennedy JF, Knill CJ. Modified gums: Approaches and applications in drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(3):1031-1047. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.043
  12. Jonker AM, Lowik DW, van Hest JC. Peptide- and protein-based hydrogels. Chem Mater. 2012;24(5):759-773. doi:10.1021/cm202640w
  13. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan—A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36(8):981-1014. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001
  14. Bernkop-Schnurch A, Dunnhaupt S. Chitosan-based drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012;81(3):463-469. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.04.007
  15. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Nair SV, Tamura H. Novel chitin and chitosan nanofibers in biomedical applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(1):142-150. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.001
  16. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1):106-126. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003
  17. Pawar SN, Edgar KJ. Alginate derivatization: A review of chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials. 2012;33(11):3279-3305. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.007
  18. Sun J, Tan H. Alginate-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications. Materials (Basel). 2013;6(4):1285-1309. doi:10.3390/ma6041285
  19. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2011;23(12):H41-H56. doi:10.1002/adma.201003963
  20. Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(7):528-539. doi:10.1038/nrc1391
  21. Rao NV, Yoon HY, Han HS, et al. Recent developments in hyaluronic acid-based nanomedicine for targeted cancer treatment. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(2):239-252. doi:10.1517/17425247.2016.1112374
  22. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2015;73:254-271. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
  23. Foox M, Zilberman M. Drug delivery from gelatin-based systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015;12(9):1547-1563. doi:10.1517/17425247.2015.1037272
  24. Langer R, Peppas N. Chemical and physical structure of polymers as carriers for controlled release of bioactive agents: A review. J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys. 1983;23(1):61-126. doi:10.1080/07366578308079439
  25. Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R. Drug release from layered, dome-shaped tablets: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;29(3-4):317-324. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2006.05.007
  26. Sriamornsak P. Chemistry of pectin and its pharmaceutical uses: A review. Silpakorn Univ Int J. 2003;3(1-2):206-228.
  27. Elzoghby AO, Abd-Elwakil MM, Abd-Elsalam K, Elsayed MT, Hashem Y, Mohamed O. Natural polymeric nanoparticles for brain-targeting: implications on drug and gene delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(22):3305-3323. doi:10.2174/1381612822666160204120829
  28. Sinha VR, Kumria R. Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2001;224(1-2):19-38. doi:10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00720-7
  29. Nayak AK, Pal D. Natural starches-blended ionotropically-gelled micrparticles/beads for sustained drug release. In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK, editors. Handbook of Polymers for Pharmaceutical Technologies. New York: Wiley; 2015. p. 527-560.
  30. Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bioadhesive materials: a review. Biomaterials. 1996;17(16):1553-1561. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)00307-X
  31. Cheng R, Meng F, Deng C, Klok HA, Zhong Z. Dual and multi-stimuli responsive polymeric nanoparticles for programmed site-specific drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34(14):3647-3657. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.084
  32. Hu Q, Katti PS, Gu Z. Enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale. 2014;6(21):12273-12286. doi:10.1039/C4NR04249B
  33. Kanamala M, Wilson WR, Yang M, Palmer BD, Wu Z. Mechanisms and biomaterials in pH-responsive tumour targeted drug delivery: A review. Biomaterials. 2016;85:152-167. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.061
  34. Tannock IF, Rotin D. Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. Cancer Res. 1989;49(16):4373-4384. PMID:2545340
  35. Du JZ, Du XJ, Mao CQ, Wang J. Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer-doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(44):17560-17563. doi:10.1021/ja207150n
  36. Ward MA, Georgiou TK. Thermoresponsive polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers (Basel). 2011;3(3):1215-1242. doi:10.3390/polym3031215
  37. Liu M, Song X, Wen Y, Zhu JL, Li J. Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogel formed by alginate-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) that releases doxorubicin-encapsulated nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(41):35673-35682. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b12849
  38. Ke W, Li J, Mohammed F, et al. Therapeutic polymersome nanoreactors with tumor-specific activable cascade reactions for cooperative cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(2):2357-2369. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b09082
  39. Choi KY, Yoon HY, Kim JH, et al. Smart nanocarrier based on PEGylated hyaluronic acid for cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2011;5(11):8591-8599. doi:10.1021/nn202070n
  40. Brondsted H, Kopecek J. Hydrogels for site-specific oral drug delivery: synthesis and characterization. Biomaterials. 1991;12(6):584-592. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(91)90057-D
  41. Gao W, Liang Y, Dong X, et al. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for the treatment of cancer. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(11):3037-3055. doi:10.1039/D0BM00180E
  42. Yoo D, Jeong H, Noh SH, Lee JH, Cheon J. Magnetically triggered dual functional nanoparticles for resistance-free apoptotic hyperthermia. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52(49):13047-13051. doi:10.1002/anie.201306557
  43. Ge Z, Liu S. Functional block copolymer assemblies responsive to tumor and intracellular microenvironments for site-specific drug delivery and enhanced imaging performance. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(17):7289-7325. doi:10.1039/C3CS60048C
  44. Ryu JH, Chacko RT, Jiwpanich S, Bickerton S, Babu RP, Thayumanavan S. Self-cross-linked polymer nanogels: a versatile nanoscopic drug delivery platform. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(48):17227-17235. doi:10.1021/ja1069932
  45. Xing R, Liu K, Jiao T, et al. An injectable self-assembling collagen-gold hybrid hydrogel for combinatorial antitumor photothermal/ photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater. 2016;28(19):3669-3676. doi:10.1002/adma.201600284
  46. [46] Harvey AL, Edrada-Ebel R, Quinn RJ. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(2):111-129. doi:10.1038/nrd4510
  47. Atanasov AG, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig EM, et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(8):1582-1614. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001
  48. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(6):3670-3695. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.008
  49. Prasad S, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB. Recent developments in delivery, bioavailability, absorption and metabolism of curcumin: the golden pigment from golden spice. Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(1):2-18. doi:10.4143/crt.2014.46.1.2
  50. Chen L, Remondetto GE, Subirade M. Food protein-based materials as nutraceutical delivery systems. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17(5):272-283. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.011
  51. Thiombiano AE, Weremijewicz J, Garbett A, et al. P-glycoprotein and the challenge of herbal bioactives delivery. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;198:200-212.
  52. Shoba G, Joy D, Joseph T, Majeed M, Rajendran R, Srinivas PS. Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Med. 1998;64(4):353-356. doi:10.1055/s-2006-957450
  53. Singh R, Lillard JW Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86(3):215-223. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.004
  54. Saraogi GK, Gupta P, Gupta UD, Jain NK, Agrawal GP. Gelatin nanocarriers as potential vectors for effective management of tuberculosis. Int J Pharm. 2010;385(1-2):143-149. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.10.004
  55. Saraf S, Khan J, Alexander A, et al. Stimuli responsive chitosan as a promising drug delivery system. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;155:760-764. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.238
  56. Mokhtari RB, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(23):38022-38043. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16723
  57. Das RK, Kasoju N, Bora U. Encapsulation of curcumin in alginate-chitosan-pluronic composite nanoparticles for delivery to cancer cells. Nanomedicine. 2010;6(1):153-160. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2009.05.009
  58. Lin YH, Liang HF, Chung CK, Chen MC, Sung HW. Physically crosslinked alginate/N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogels with calcium for oral delivery of protein drugs. Biomaterials. 2005;26(14):2105-2113. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.011
  59. Akbari J, Saeedi M, Enayatifard R, Hashemi SMH, Babaei A, Tafaghodi M. Chitosan-based film formulations for topical delivery of silymarin: preparation and evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;36:196-202.
  60. Prabaharan M, Mano JF. Chitosan-based particles as controlled drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. 2005;12(1):41-57. doi:10.1080/10717540590889781
  61. Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5536-5544. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
  62. Jogani VV, Shah PJ, Mishra P, Mishra AK, Misra AR. Intranasal mucoadhesive microemulsion of tacrine to improve brain targeting. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008;22(2):116-124. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e318166d21b
  63. Yhee JY, Lee SJ, Lee S, et al. Tumor-targeting transfersomal formulations of herbal phytochemicals: An overview. J Control Release. 2017;259:168-185.
  64. Shukla RK, Tiwari A. Carbohydrate polymers: Applications and recent advances in delivering drugs to the colon. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(2):399-416. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.003
  65. Andrographolide-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: Preparation and evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2018;44(3):409-416.
  66. Fu Q, Harber G, Masoud S, et al. Reactive oxygen species-responsive polymer nanoparticles with anti-PD-L1 properties. Adv Mater. 2021;33(43):e2100526.
  67. Gao C, Bhosale NK, Gupta S, et al. ROS-responsive nanoparticles for enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(28):24996-25004.
  68. Saito G, Swanson JA, Lee KD. Drug delivery strategy utilizing conjugation via reversible disulfide linkages: role and site of cellular reducing activities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(2):199-215. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00179-5
  69. Chen J, Huang SW, Zhuo RX. Preparation and properties of novel temperature- and pH-responsive chitin/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) complex hydrogels. Macromol Biosci. 2009;9(12):1194-1201. doi:10.1002/mabi.200900129
  70. Lim EK, Kim T, Paik S, Haam S, Huh YM, Lee K. Nanomaterials for theranostics: recent advances and future challenges. Chem Rev. 2015;115(1):327-394. doi:10.1021/cr300213b
  71. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(12):751-760. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387
  72. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release. 2000;65(1-2):271-284. doi:10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5
  73. Yallapu MM, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC. Curcumin nanoformulations: a future nanomedicine for cancer. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17(1-2):71-80. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.09.009
  74. Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013;15(1):195-218. doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9432-8
  75. Anitha A, Deepa MK, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV, Tamura H, Jayakumar R. Development of mucoadhesive thiolated chitosan nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(2):66-73. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.031
  76. Bansal SS, Goel M, Aqil F, Vadhanam MV, Gupta RC. Advanced drug delivery systems of curcumin for cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(8):1158-1171. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0006
  77. Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):13-25. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030
  78. Bhavna M, Md S, Ali M, Baboota S, Sahni JK, Ali J. Donepezil nanosuspension intended for nose-to-brain targeting: formulation, optimization, characterization and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2014;471(1-2):96-105.
  79. Gabathuler R. Approaches to transport therapeutic drugs across the blood-brain barrier to treat brain diseases. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):48-57. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.028
  80. Md S, Khan RA, Mustafa G, et al. Bromocriptine loaded chitosan nanoparticles intended for direct nose to brain delivery: pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and scintigraphy study in mice model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;48(3):393-405. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2012.12.007
  81. Gao H. Perspectives on dual targeting delivery systems for brain tumors. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2017;12(1):6-16. doi:10.1007/s11481-016-9687-4
  82. Rubinstein A. Approaches and opportunities in colon-specific drug delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1995;12(2-3):101-149. doi:10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v12.i2-3.10
  83. Saez A, Guzman M, Molpeceres J, Aberturas MR. Freeze-drying of polycaprolactone and poly(D,L-lactic-glycolic) nanoparticles induce minor particle size changes affecting the oral pharmacokinetics of loaded drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(3):379-387. doi:10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00121-6
  84. Agarwal R, Agarwal C, Ichikawa H, Singh RP, Aggarwal BB. Anticancer potential of silymarin: from bench to bed side. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(6B):4457-4498. PMID: 172011
  85. Sharma G, Dhankar G, Thakur K, Raza K, Katare OP. Cationic polysaccharide-based drug delivery systems. In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK, editors. Handbook of Polymers for Pharmaceutical Technologies. New York: Wiley; 2015. p. 227-258.
  86. Masarudin MJ, Cutts SM, Evison BJ, Phillips DR, Pigram PJ. Factors determining the stability, size distribution, and cellular accumulation of small, monodisperse chitosan nanoparticles as candidate vectors for anticancer drug delivery: application to the passive encapsulation of [(14)C]-doxorubicin. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2015;8:67-80. doi:10.2147/NSA.S91785
  87. Bhattaram VA, Graefe U, Kohlert C, Veit M, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of herbal medicinal products. Phytomedicine. 2002;9 Suppl 3:1-33. doi:10.1078/1433-187X-00210
  88. Hafner A, Lovric J, Lakos GP, Pepic I. Nanotherapeutics in the EU: an overview on current state and future directions. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:1005-1023. doi:10.2147/IJN.S55359
  89. Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7(12):779-786. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.207
  90. Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007; 2(8):469-478. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.223
  91. De Geest BG, Stubbe BG, Jonas AM, et al. Self-exploding lipid-coated microgels. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(1):373-379. doi:10.1021/bm050404r
  92. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23(6):1241-1250. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039
  93. Zhang Y, Huang Y, Li S. Polymeric micelles: nanostructural construction, inherent self-assembly, and bioapplications. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(4):862-871. doi:10.1208/s12249-014-0113-3
  94. Chimene D, Lennox KK, Kaunas RR, Gaharwar AK. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: A materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(6):2090-2102. doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y
  95. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug Products, Including Biological Products, that Contain Nanomaterials. Guidance for Industry. Silver Spring: FDA; 2022. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents

Photo
Preeti Sah
Corresponding author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Rau-Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Photo
Vishal Makwana
Co-author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Rau-Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Photo
Dr. Pritesh Paliwal
Co-author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Rau-Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Photo
Dr. Nimita Manoch
Co-author

Indore Institute of Pharmacy, Rau-Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Preeti Sah, Vishal Makwana, Dr. Pritesh Paliwal, Dr. Nimita Manocha, Biopolymer-Based Stimuli-Responsive Systems for Herbal Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 4, 3138-3156. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19667578

More related articles
Delonix regia's Potential Health Benefits: Investi...
Shashank Tiwari, Shreya Talreja, ...
Review On Pharmacovigilance In Dentistry ...
Mallolu Anthony Sanjana Vijay, Samufathima A. I., Suvetha V., Suv...
Pharmaceutical Validation: A Review...
Swati Jagtap, P. B. Jadhav, Vinod Bairagi, ...
A Brief Review On Emulgel...
Abishek jhariya , Najneen Dubey, Shubhangi Nema, Bharti Choudhary, ...
Sustainable Biodegradable Packaging Films from Typha latifolia and Water Hyacint...
Shruti Ardhi, Shefali Pandey, Rashmi Kori, Shivani Singh, Siddhi Mahadik, Dr. Deepa Verma, Devesh Ma...
More related articles
Review On Pharmacovigilance In Dentistry ...
Mallolu Anthony Sanjana Vijay, Samufathima A. I., Suvetha V., Suvetha V., Sarumathi T., Santhiya. K....
Review On Pharmacovigilance In Dentistry ...
Mallolu Anthony Sanjana Vijay, Samufathima A. I., Suvetha V., Suvetha V., Sarumathi T., Santhiya. K....