Abstract
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) has transformed HIV prevention by providing substantial defense against transmission. This review extensively examines the various facets of PrEP, including its effectiveness, difficulties with adherence, and strategies for implementation. We examine the pharmacokinetic thresholds, steady-state drug levels, and adherence patterns that impact the effectiveness of PrEP. Furthermore, we investigate the critical importance of counseling in promoting adherence and discuss techniques for incorporating PrEP into medical facilities. The review also discusses challenges in implementation such as testing methods, coverage, and the potential influence of behavioral disinhibition. Additionally, we examine the psychosocial elements that impact the adoption of PrEP, including risk assessment, knowledge, and discrimination. This review aims to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and individuals about the potential benefits and challenges of PrEP by giving a thorough overview, ultimately helping with its effective implementation and utilization.
Keywords
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV prevention, adherence, pharmacokinetics, counseling, implementation challenges, psychosocial factors, risk perception, stigma, healthcare systems.
Introduction
Over the past decade, the introduction of innovative biomedical methods has revolutionized HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus) prevention, reshaping the trajectory of the epidemic [1,2]. PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis) involves the use of antiretroviral medication to significantly reduce the likelihood of HIV infection [3]. Daily oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) has emerged as a ground breaking strategy in HIV prevention, showing remarkable success in curbing transmission and becoming a widely adopted measure in diverse environments [4,5]. We concentrate on preventing HIV transmission through sexual activity, as the effectiveness of PrEP [6]. We Covers Drug level at the time of Exposure, Prevention of HIV Through PrEP During Steady- State Drug level Concentration, Effective Counseling for Adhering to PrEP in HIV Prevention, and Measuring Program Success Through Effective Adherence to Prevention Strategies [7,8,9]. We Highlight making a Health System and setting PrEP-Friendly, Overcoming Personal Challenges and New Options for PrEP. Navigating Pregnancy and Contraception with PrEP, Overcoming Challenges in PrEP Access for Women [10,11,12]. Central Focus on Different Challenges in HIV Risk Assessment for Women: Consequences for PrEP Use and Risk Stratification The devices Several Techniques for Measuring Adherence to PrEP: Managing Methodological Issues and New Technologies in HIV Prevention [13,14,15]. HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Tissue-Specific Considerations and Exposure Risk Windows for Pharmacokinetic Thresholds and Dosage Dynamics [16,17]. Core Area is The implications on dosage adherence and tissue-specific kinetics in pharmacodynamic equilibrium in HIV PrEP [18]. The section called "Implementation Challenges" covers the difficulties in putting PrEP programs into practice, including methods for testing, coverage, and adherence obstacles [19]. and all of the components associated with the acceptance and execution of PrEP, such as willingness, awareness, perception of risk, and stigma [20,21].
Multifaceted Challenges in HIV Risk Assessment for Women: Implications for PrEP Uptake and Risk Stratification Tools
HIV risk perception Women at risk for HIV infection may not be fully conscious of their partner's HIV risk, which can lead to an underestimation of their own risk and a reduction in motivation to start and/or strictly adhere to PrEP [22,23,24]. This presents a difficulty for the adoption of methods for preventing HIV in women. Additionally, inadequate HIV risk assessment among women can affect healthcare providers' recommendations and PrEP advising trends [25,26]. Risk factors for HIV acquisition in women might be indirect (partner's risk behavior, HIV density of sexual networks, excessive sexual activity, personal substance use, genital illnesses) in addition to direct (i.e., difficult to spot) [27,28]. Women might not be aware of their own HIV risk, might feel guilty or humiliated for revealing their actual risk [29]. They might not fully comprehend the risk behaviors of their partners, or they could believe that talking about these risks is inappropriate (e.g., in the context of intimate partner abuse) [30]. Tools taking into consideration factors including age, partner HIV viral load, marital status, drug usage, unprotected sex, and so on [31,32]. Risk stratification is an inexpensive method of evaluating who most needs PrEP. To reliably predict HIV risk among women, these techniques must be modified for the setting and incorporate population-specific data, such as local HIV prevalence [33,34].
Multifaceted Approaches to Quantifying PrEP Adherence: Navigating Methodological Limitations and Emerging Technologies in HIV Prevention
Quantifying PrEP use is the next stage in evaluating prevention-effective adherence [35]. There isn't a single ideal method for assessing medication-taking behavior; each approach has pros and cons. Understanding adherence behavior requires a context-appropriate combination of several measures, since individual adherence measures are not flawless [36,37]. Crucially, in multiple PrEP clinical trials, self-report was mainly uninformative due to over reporting of adherence, and it did not correlate with dosage regimens [38]. As was previously mentioned in relation to self-reported risk behavior, and/or questions that have been verified by objective PrEP adherence metrics may help to increase self-reported adherence [39]. In the event that there are no repercussions for reporting socially undesirable behaviour (such as onerous intervention components when have been reports of condom-free sex or non-adherence) [40, 41]. Remarkably, there is a higher likelihood of accuracy in reporting nonadherence than in reporting adherence [42]. Pharmacy refill data offer a methodical technique that has been successful in anticipating viral suppression in antiretroviral therapy programs and could be workable for regular clinical use with PrEP. Electronic adherence monitoring is only available for research studies due to cost concerns, but it is the only approach that provides dose-by-dose measurement for evaluating adherence patterns, which are essential for comprehending prevention-effective adherence [43,44,45]. Therefore, it should be thought of implementing electronic monitoring in at least a portion of participants in demonstration programs [46]. This is also wireless electronic monitoring, which can deliver data instantly, lower the chance of data loss, and require less personnel to collect data in geographically separated environments [47,48]. Drug levels are not practicable for normal use, but they were essential for reliably documenting the administration of medicines in the PrEP clinical studies [49]. For demonstration projects, stored samples for selective testing present an possible economical option [50].
Pharmacokinetic Thresholds and Dosage Dynamics in HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Tissue-Specific Considerations and Exposure Risk Windows
The drugs level at the point of risk exposure must be sufficient to stop HIV replication for the adherence pattern to be protective [51, 52]. Two weekly doses on average may offer 76?ficacy in modeling studies based on MSM, four weekly doses may offer 96% protection, and seven weekly doses may offer 99?ficacy [53, 54]. However, vaginal tissue may require a higher average oral dosage for maintaining drug levels in a safe range since rectal tissue has substantially greater tenofovir concentrations than vaginal tissue [55, 56]. Furthermore, it is difficult to determine the exact moment at which the risk resulting from an exposure has subsided because it is not known how long it takes for HIV to entirely leave the body. PEP offers useful guidance from which recommendations might be made [57, 58].
Pharmacodynamic Equilibrium in HIV PrEP: Tissue-Specific Kinetics and Dosage Adherence Implications
The majority of oral PrEP trials' success has been linked to tenofovir blood concentrations [59]. The majority of estimations suggest that steady-state treatment concentrations in blood mononuclear cells can be achieved with about seven oral dosages per day [60]. There aren't as many data to determine when steady-state concentrations in vaginal and rectal tissue are reached, but the data typically match blood concentrations, so it's reasonable to recommend employing PrEP for seven days before gaining protection [61, 62]. When steady state is still not reached, the effects of doses not taken on efficacy may have more severe consequences (i.e., there is probably less "forgiveness" for missed doses) [63]. These issues need to be taken into account at all times when using PrEP, not just at beginnings, since its usage may be intermittent.
Figure no 1 "PK/PD Modeling" (Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic) brings in the critical scientific evaluation of drug behavior and effects in the body.
Expanding PrEP Access and Addressing Implementation Challenges.
Since the approach may work just as well for men, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), looks to be a prospective new option to close the gender gap in female-controlled prevention [64]. The concept of utilizing antiretroviral drugs (ARV), as a preventative therapy has been studied and shown to be effective in preventing HIV transmission from mother to child [65, 66]. More importantly, post-exposure prophylaxis, or PEP, is an expected practice for healthcare workers follow an incidental HIV exposure and has been shown to prevent 80% of HIV infections carried on by needle mishaps [67, 68]. Some worry that using PrEP People on PrEP can feel less vulnerable to HIV infection and as a result use fewer condoms [69]. Behavioral disinhibition has the potential to substantially mitigate or even reverse the impact of PrEP, especially in those conditions once its coverage and effectiveness are poor people [70]. Exact assessments of PrEP's impact on populations could aid leaders and aid in the design of PrEP applications for HIVcontrol efforts [71]. Due to the several clinical trials that showed the effectiveness of tenofovir or tenofovir/FTC against HIV transmission, there is currently a demand for the implementation of such programs. Only those who have not been infected start receiving PrEP. Either Provider-Initiated Testing and Counselling (PITC) or Client-Initiated Testing and Training (CITC, formerly known as Voluntary Counselling and Testing) can be used to detect people without HIV . PrEP coverage relies on people without HIV who are using PrEP. Some will cease taking prescription drugs (non-adherence) [72, 73]. We also modeled an intervention with led to a rise in the usage of contraceptives in client-sex worker contacts in order to look into alternatives to PrEP [74].
Addressing Individual-Level Barriers to PrEP Uptake and Adherence.
PrEP cascades akin to the HIV testing and treatment cascade, individual-level barriers to PrEP uptake and persistence have been discovered [75, 76]. While the details and ordering of these obstacles vary, the phases in the cascades tend to be the same. First, local efforts that boost demand for PrEP are closely correlated with and require awareness of the program [77]. High levels of information among all population members in important populations—not just those who are currently eligible for PrEP—should be goal. In spite of recognizing that risk is dynamic and that a person who is not at risk now might become one in the future, this also helps to foster community support for the use of PrEP. Second, using PrEP is a necessity and may help to clarify non-use among particular high-risk individuals who are aware about PrEP [78, 79], concerns about side effects, attitudes toward medications in general, and readiness to participate in the necessary clinical procedures are all aspects that can contribute to a person's willingness to use PrEP. Disentangling and addressing these components depending on specific people and environments is necessary [80, 81]. Third, the decision to start PrEP relies on an individual's awareness of potential risk, and it has been found that a significant factor in persons who are at risk choosing not to start PrEP is the discrepancy between their perceptions of risk and their actual risks [82,83]. Some experts think that it can be counterproductive to employ risk and risk-avoidance principles when advertising PrEP because such messages is not economical for those who believe that they're in risk [84]. It has been documented by research that it is frequently preferred to frame PrEP in terms of positive results, such as reduced anxiety and improved pleasure or affection [85]. In addition to this so-called "gain-framing" messaging, it might be crucial to simplify risk messaging and concentrate it on specific behaviors [86]. Given that the stigma associated with PrEP and the belief of stigma is a significant barrier to PrEP uptake, this adjustment must be made without stigmatizing these behaviors [87]. Furthermore, those who feel that their episodes of potential risk are not frequent enough to justify daily
CONCLUSION:
The many challenges that women must overcome in order to obtain and use Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention are brought to light in this review. Inadequate assessment of risk, together with cultural elements and personal challenges, substantially hinders the adoption and conformity of PrEP. To tackle these obstacles, a comprehensive strategy is needed, involving refining risk assessment tools, increasing healthcare professional education, and tackling the stigma that the public associated with HIV and PrEP. To further maximize PrEP's efficiency on decreasing HIV transmission among women, it must be expanded into varied contexts and effective counseling strategies need to be carried out. By addressing these critical issues, we can empower women to make informed decisions about their health and reduce their risk of HIV infection.
REFERENCE
- Obeagu EI, Obeagu GU. Neonatal Outcomes in Children Born to Mothers with Severe Malaria, HIV, and Transfusion History: A Review. Elite Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2024;2(3):38-58.
- Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swendeman D, Chovnick G. The past, present, and future of HIV prevention: integrating behavioral, biomedical, and structural intervention strategies for the next generation of HIV prevention. Annual review of clinical psychology. 2009 Apr 27;5(1):143-67.
- Spinner CD, Boesecke C, Zink A, Jessen H, Stellbrink HJ, Rockstroh JK, Esser S. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): a review of current knowledge of oral systemic HIV PrEP in humans. Infection. 2016 Apr;44:151-8.
- Ramjee G, Whitaker C. Biomedical HIV prevention. InBiomedical Engineering-From Theory to Applications 2011 Aug 29. IntechOpen.
- Galindo GR, Walker JN, Hazelton P, Lane T, Steward WT, Morin SF, Arnold EA. Community member perspectives from transgender women and men who have sex with men on pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: implications for implementation. Implementation science. 2012 Dec;7:1-3.
- Murchu EO, Marshall L, Teljeur C, Harrington P, Hayes C, Moran P, Ryan M. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations. BMJ open. 2022 May 1;12(5):e048478.
- Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR, Baeten JM, Curran K, Koechlin F, Amico KR, Anderson P, Mugo N, Venter F, Goicochea P, Caceres C. Defining success with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a prevention-effective adherence paradigm. Aids. 2015 Jul 17;29(11):1277-85.
- Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, Brantley J, Bangsberg DR, Haberer JE, Mujugira A, Mugo N, Ndase P, Hendrix C, Celum C. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014 Jul 1;66(3):340-8.
- Mayer KH, Safren SA, Elsesser SA, Psaros C, Tinsley JP, Marzinke M, Clarke W, Hendrix C, Wade Taylor S, Haberer J, Mimiaga MJ. Optimizing pre-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis adherence in men who have sex with men: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial of “Life-Steps for PrEP”. AIDS and Behavior. 2017 May;21:1350-60.
- Christianson A. The mutable dynamics of HIV-prevention: Insights from Ontarian MSM on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University).
- Teitelman AM, Tieu HV, Chittamuru D, Shaw PA, Nandi V, Davis A, Lipsky RK, Darlington CK, Fiore D, Koblin BA. A randomized controlled pilot study of Just4Us, a counseling and navigation intervention to promote oral HIV prophylaxis uptake among PrEP-eligible cisgender women. AIDS and Behavior. 2023 Sep;27(9):2944-58.
- Deml M. POSTING PREP: AVirtual ETHNOGRAPHY OF HIV/AIDS PREVENTION, HEALTH LITERACY, AND CYBERBIOPOLITICS.
- Gable AR, Lagakos SW, editors. Methodological challenges in biomedical HIV prevention trials. National Academies Press; 2008 Jun 13.
- Beckham SW, Crossnohere NL, Gross M, Bridges JF. Eliciting preferences for HIV prevention technologies: a systematic review. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 2021 Mar;14:151-74.
- Napierala Mavedzenge S, Baggaley R, Corbett EL. A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention. Clinical infectious diseases. 2013 Jul 1;57(1):126-38.
- Straubinger T, Kay K, Bies R. Modeling HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020 Jan 31;10:1514.
- Nicol M. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV: Linking Antiretroviral Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics to Identify Optimal Dosing Strategies.
- Barrett JS, Labbé L, Pfister M. Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2005 Jun;44:591-625.
- Kay ES, Pinto RM. Is insurance a barrier to HIV preexposure prophylaxis? Clarifying the issue. American journal of public health. 2020 Jan;110(1):61-4.
- Kerr J, Ayangeakaa S, Combs R, Harris L, Sears J, Northington T, Burton K, Sterrett-Hong E, Parker K, Krigger K. Community-informed development of a campaign to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness among African-American young adults. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2021 Aug;8:901-11.
- Li DH, Benbow N, Keiser B, Mongrella M, Ortiz K, Villamar J, Gallo C, Deskins JS, Hall CD, Miller C, Mustanski B. Determinants of implementation for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis based on an updated consolidated framework for implementation research: a systematic review. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2022 Jul 1;90(S1):S235-46.
- Mathews RD. A Qualitative Examination of the Barriers and Facilitators of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEp) Uptake among Heterosexual HIV Serodiscordant Couples (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park).
- Munyewende PO. Perceptions of risk and level of precaution used to prevent HIV/AIDS infection: A study of Zimbabwean migrant women living in Johannesburg (Doctoral dissertation).
- Netter M. Nurse Practitioners’ Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEp) Knowledge, Perspectives, and Prescribing Practices for Women (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center).
- Pleuhs B, Quinn KG, Walsh JL, Petroll AE, John SA. Health care provider barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2020 Mar 1;34(3):111-23.
- Hodges-Mameletzis I, Fonner VA, Dalal S, Mugo N, Msimanga-Radebe B, Baggaley R. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in women: current status and future directions. Drugs. 2019 Aug 1;79(12):1263-76.
- Costenbader EC, Astone NM, Latkin CA. The dynamics of injection drug users’ personal networks and HIV risk behaviors. Addiction. 2006 Jul;101(7):1003-13.
- Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A, Sherman S. Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Social science & medicine. 2003 Feb 1;56(3):465-76.
- El-Bassel N, Gilbertl L, Rajah V, Foleno A, Frye V. Fear and violence: Raising the HIV stakes. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2000 Apr 1;12(2):154.
- Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatric clinics of north america. 1997 Jun 1;20(2):353-74.
- Sacamano PL, Farley JE. Behavioral and other characteristics associated with HIV viral load in an outpatient clinic. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 2;11(11):e0166016.
- Kalichman SC, Cherry C, White D, Jones ML, Grebler T, Kalichman MO, Detorio M, Caliendo AM, Schinazi RF. Sexual HIV transmission and antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort study of behavioral risk factors among men and women living with HIV/AIDS. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2011 Aug 1;42(1):111-9.
- Clark SJ, Thomas JR, Bao L. Estimates of age-specific reductions in HIV prevalence in Uganda: Bayesian melding estimation and probabilistic population forecast with an HIV-enabled cohort component projection model. Demographic research. 2012 Dec 12;27.
- Balkus JE, Brown E, Palanee T, Nair G, Gafoor Z, Zhang J, Richardson BA, Chirenje ZM, Marrazzo JM, Baeten JM. An empiric HIV risk scoring tool to predict HIV-1 acquisition in African women. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2016 Jul 1;72(3):333-43.
- Cooney EE, Reisner SL, Saleem HT, Althoff KN, Beckham SW, Radix A, Cannon CM, Schneider JS, Haw JS, Rodriguez AE, Wawrzyniak AJ. Prevention-effective adherence trajectories among transgender women indicated for PrEP in the United States: a prospective cohort study. Annals of epidemiology. 2022 Jun 1;70:23-31.
- Voth EC, Oelke ND, Jung ME. A theory-based exercise app to enhance exercise adherence: a pilot study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2016 Jun 15;4(2):e4997.
- Horgan P, Salami O, del Barrio MO, Tomar A, Chadha SS, Basnyat B, Shakya SU, Kaawa-Magiri D, Hopkins H, Kapisi J, Kukula V. Exploring the behavioural determinants of adherence to prescription for acute febrile illnesses, and development of a training and communication clinical trial intervention: a description of research methods. medRxiv. 2020 Dec 4:2020-12.
- Dhalla S. Cognitive factors and willingness to participate in an HIV vaccine trial in injection drug users (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
- Pasipanodya EC, Li MJ, Jain S, Sun X, Tobin J, Ellorin E, Dube M, Daar ES, Corado K, Milam J, Blumenthal J. Greater levels of self-reported adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are associated with increased condomless sex among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior. 2020 Nov;24:3192-204.
- Maher L, Mooney-Somers J, Phlong P, Couture MC, Kien SP, Stein E, Bates AJ, Sansothy N, Page K, Young Women's Health Study Collaborative. Condom negotiation across different relationship types by young women engaged in sex work in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Global public health. 2013 Mar 1;8(3):270-83.
- Dano UB. An exploratory study of psychosocial implications of HIV serodiscordance in married heterosexual couples (Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban).
- Pasipanodya EC, Li MJ, Jain S, Sun X, Tobin J, Ellorin E, Dube M, Daar ES, Corado K, Milam J, Blumenthal J. Greater levels of self-reported adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are associated with increased condomless sex among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior. 2020 Nov;24:3192-204.
- Davey DL, Nyemba D, Castillo-Mancilla J, Wiesner L, Norman J, Mvududu R, Mashele N, Johnson LF, Bekker LG, Gorbach P, Coates TJ. Adherence to Daily Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in South African Women: A Cohort Study. Available at SSRN 4081090.
- Musinguzi N, Muwonge T, Ngure K, Katabira E, Mugo N, Burns BF, Baeten JM, Heffron R, Haberer JE. Comparison of short messaging service self-reported adherence with other adherence measures in a demonstration project of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in Kenya and Uganda. AIDS. 2018 Sep 24;32(15):2237-45.
- Chai PR, Goodman G, Bustamante M, Mendez L, Mohamed Y, Mayer KH, Boyer EW, Rosen RK, O’Cleirigh C. Design and delivery of real-time adherence data to men who have sex with men using antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis via an ingestible electronic sensor. AIDS and Behavior. 2021 Jun;25:1661-74.
- Stevens Jr DL. Implementation of a national monitoring program. Journal of environmental management. 1994 Sep 1;42(1):1-29.
- Corke P, Wark T, Jurdak R, Hu W, Valencia P, Moore D. Environmental wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2010 Oct 7;98(11):1903-17.
- Mois G, Folea S, Sanislav T. Analysis of three IoT-based wireless sensors for environmental monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2017 Mar 27;66(8):2056-64.
- Bavinton BR, Bushby B, Murphy D, Cornelisse VJ, Philpot S, Chan C, Wright EJ, Grulich AE. Discussion Paper: Research priorities for implementing long-acting injectable Cabotegravir for PrEP in Australia.
- Squire L, Van der Tak HG. Economic analysis of projects. World Bank Publications; 1975.
- Sidebottom D, Ekström AM, Strömdahl S. A systematic review of adherence to oral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV–how can we improve uptake and adherence?. BMC infectious diseases. 2018 Dec;18:1-4.
- Haberer JE, Baeten JM, Campbell J, Wangisi J, Katabira E, Ronald A, Tumwesigye E, Psaros C, Safren SA, Ware NC, Thomas KK. Adherence to antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a substudy cohort within a clinical trial of serodiscordant couples in East Africa. PLoS medicine. 2013 Sep 10;10(9):e1001511.
- Cohen MS, Muessig KE, Smith MK, Powers KA, Kashuba AD. Antiviral agents and HIV prevention: controversies, conflicts, and consensus. Aids. 2012 Aug 24;26(13):1585-98.
- Weber J, Tatoud R, Fidler S. Postexposure prophylaxis, preexposure prophylaxis or universal test and treat: the strategic use of antiretroviral drugs to prevent HIV acquisition and transmission. Aids. 2010 Oct 1;24:S27-39.
- Thurman AR, Schwartz JL, Brache V, Clark MR, McCormick T, Chandra N, Marzinke MA, Stanczyk FZ, Dezzutti CS, Hillier SL, Herold BC. Randomized, placebo controlled phase I trial of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and acceptability of tenofovir and tenofovir plus levonorgestrel vaginal rings in women. PloS one. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199778.
- Clark MR, Peet MM, Davis S, Doncel GF, Friend DR. Evaluation of rapidly disintegrating vaginal tablets of tenofovir, emtricitabine and their combination for HIV-1 prevention. Pharmaceutics. 2014 Dec 8;6(4):616-31.
- DeHaan E, McGowan JP, Fine SM, Vail R, Merrick ST, Radix A, Hoffmann CJ, Gonzalez CJ. PEP to prevent HIV infection.
- Cresswell F, Asanati K, Bhagani S, Boffito M, Delpech V, Ellis J, Fox J, Furness L, Kingston M, Mansouri M, Samarawickrama A. UK guideline for the use of HIV post?exposure prophylaxis 2021. HIV medicine. 2022 May;23(5):494-545.
- Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, Brantley J, Bangsberg DR, Haberer JE, Mujugira A, Mugo N, Ndase P, Hendrix C, Celum C. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014 Jul 1;66(3):340-8.
- Moore KH, Barrett JE, Shaw S, Pakes GE, Churchus R, Kapoor A, Lloyd J, Barry MG, Back D. The pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients infected with HIV-1. Aids. 1999 Nov 12;13(16):2239-50.
- Louissaint NA, Cao YJ, Skipper PL, Liberman RG, Tannenbaum SR, Nimmagadda S, Anderson JR, Everts S, Bakshi R, Fuchs EJ, Hendrix CW. Single dose pharmacokinetics of oral tenofovir in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, colonic tissue, and vaginal tissue. AIDS research and human retroviruses. 2013 Nov 1;29(11):1443-50.
- Herrera C, Lwanga J, Lee M, Mantori S, Amara A, Else L, Penchala SD, Egan D, Challenger E, Dickinson L, Boffito M. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigation of raltegravir with or without lamivudine in the context of HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2021 Aug 1;76(8):2129-36.
- Mayer KH, Safren SA, Elsesser SA, Psaros C, Tinsley JP, Marzinke M, Clarke W, Hendrix C, Wade Taylor S, Haberer J, Mimiaga MJ. Optimizing pre-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis adherence in men who have sex with men: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial of “Life-Steps for PrEP”. AIDS and Behavior. 2017 May;21:1350-60.
- Bailey JL, Molino ST, Vega AD, Badowski M. A review of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: the female perspective. Infectious diseases and therapy. 2017 Sep;6:363-82.
- Car LT, van?Velthoven MH, Brusamento S, Elmoniry H, Car J, Majeed A, Atun R. Integrating prevention of mother?to?child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes with other health services for preventing HIV infection and improving HIV outcomes in developing countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011(6).
- Betancourt TS, Abrams EJ, McBain R, Fawzi MC. Family?centred approaches to the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2010 Jun;13:S2-.
- Ballouz T, Sakr C, Rizk NA. “I Got Stuck!” Blood Exposure in the OR: Prevention and Management of Sharp Injuries and Infectious Disease Exposure. InPrinciples of Perioperative Safety and Efficiency 2024 May 3 (pp. 339-356). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Beltrami EM, Alvarado-Ramy F, Critchley SE, Panlilio AL, Cardo DM, Bower WA, Alter MJ, Kaplan JE, Lushniak B, Henderson DK, Struble KA. Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 2001 Jun 29;50(25).
- Ayerdi Aguirrebengoa O, Vera García M, Arias Ramírez D, Gil García N, Puerta López T, Clavo Escribano P, Ballesteros Martín J, Lejarraga Cañas C, Fernandez Piñeiro N, Fuentes Ferrer ME, García Lotero M. Low use of condom and high STI incidence among men who have sex with men in PrEP programs. PloS one. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0245925.
- Vissers DC, Voeten HA, Nagelkerke NJ, Habbema JD, de Vlas SJ. The impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on HIV epidemics in Africa and India: a simulation study. PloS one. 2008 May 7;3(5):e2077.
- Irungu EM, Baeten JM. PrEP rollout in Africa: status and opportunity. Nature medicine. 2020 May;26(5):655-64.
- Obonyo FF. Non Adherence to Pmtct Treatment and Loss to Follow Up of Hiv Positive Mothers and Babies In Mombasa County, Kenya. Unpublished masters’ thesis). School Of Public Health, Kenyatta University. 2016 Nov.
- Mutigitu JI. Factors Leading To Elevated Viral Load among HIV Infected Individuals Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in Pwani Region, Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences).
- Mukandavire Z, Mitchell KM, Vickerman P. Comparing the impact of increasing condom use or HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among female sex workers. Epidemics. 2016 Mar 1;14:62-70.
- Ongolly FK, Dolla A, Ngure K, Irungu EM, Odoyo J, Wamoni E, Peebles K, Mugwanya K, Mugo NR, Bukusi EA, Morton J. “I just decided to stop:” understanding PrEP discontinuation among individuals initiating PrEP in HIV care centers in Kenya. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2021 May 1;87(1):e150-8.
- Holtzman M. Swallowing Risk: Medical Messaging, Shameless Sex, and the Creation of New PrEP Identities (Doctoral dissertation, The New School).
- Weiss G, Smith DK, Newman S, Wiener J, Kitlas A, Hoover KW. PrEP implementation by local health departments in US cities and counties: Findings from a 2015 assessment of local health departments. PloS one. 2018 Jul 25;13(7):e0200338.
- Frontières MS. Refugee health. An approach to emergency situations. 1997.
- Seiffge-Krenke I. Adolescents' health: A developmental perspective. Psychology Press; 2019 Jan 22.
- García M, Harris AL. PrEP awareness and decision-making for Latino MSM in San Antonio, Texas. PloS one. 2017 Sep 27;12(9):e0184014.
- Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, Rothschild J, Debellis K, Seger AC, Cadoret C, Fish LS, Garber L, Kelleher M, Bates DW. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. Jama. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1107-16.
- Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu A, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, Hosek S, Mosquera C, Casapia M, Montoya O, Buchbinder S. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):820-9.
- Young LE, Schumm P, Alon L, Bouris A, Ferreira M, Hill B, Khanna AS, Valente TW, Schneider JA. PrEP Chicago: A randomized controlled peer change agent intervention to promote the adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among young Black men who have sex with men. Clinical Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):44-52.
- Botnick MR. Reasonable trust: an analysis of sexual risk, trust, and intimacy among gay men (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
- Jada KS, van den Berg M. Identifying effective message-framing techniques in behaviour change communication for healthy diets: An experimental study of promoting biofortified maize adoption in Ethiopia. Appetite. 2022 Nov 1;178:106263.
- Kim HK, Lee TK. Conditional effects of gain–loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication. 2017 Dec 2;22(12):990-8.
- Calabrese SK. Understanding, contextualizing, and addressing PrEP stigma to enhance PrEP implementation. Current Hiv/Aids Reports. 2020 Dec;17:579-88.