Govindrao Nikam College of Pharmacy, Mumbai University, Sawarde, India 415606
Pharmaceutical companies release huge amounts of wastewater. This water holds active drug parts (APIs), fillers, and harmful chemicals. These harm nature and people. Such wastes resist standard cleanup. They spark drug resistance in bacteria, mess with hormones, and cause lasting damage to ecosystems. This paper looks closely at basic and new ways to treat this water. It covers advanced oxidation (AOPs), membrane bioreactors (MBRs), built wetlands, carbon filters, electric oxidation, enzyme breakdown, gas-free digestion, and fresh tech options. For each, it explains how they work, how well they remove drug traces, their strong points, and weak spots. The review shows different methods that clear these wastes. Blended systems that mix living, chemical, and physical steps work better. They save resources and last longer. Next steps must focus on green, cheap, low-energy tools. These allow water recycling and cut bad leftovers. The paper stresses hybrid setups to guide clean water handling in drug making.
Pharmaceutical compounds are made through batch processes, which produce a wide variety of products. A large amount of water is used in these industries for different purposes, like washing solid cakes, extracting, and cleaning equipment. This leads to the production of a large amount of wastewater.(1)
Pharmaceutical compounds enter water sources mainly from two sources:
The wastewater produced during different processes contains a mix of harmful pollutants such as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and various chemicals. (2) Many developed countries like Japan, France, Germany, the UK, and the United States are leading drug producers and contribute to pharmaceutical pollution. India and China are the top producers of low-cost natural or organic-based medicines globally.(3) Pharmaceutical substances in wastewater show different chemical properties and toxicity. Improper disposal of unused or expired drugs also adds to this problem. These substances can enter water sources such as municipal drinking water, underground water for farming, and rural water supplies without any treatment.(4) Personal care products like toothpaste, lipstick, soap, shampoo, sunscreen, and detergents are also sources of pharmaceutical pollution in the environment. (5)
Because of the presence of pharmaceutical compounds in both urban and rural water sources, it is important to treat wastewater before releasing it into the environment. Even small amounts of pharmaceutical substances in water can be harmful. They may cause serious health issues like hormone problems (endocrine disruption), antibiotic resistance, and long-term health effects due to continuous exposure.(6) Due to water scarcity and environmental pollution, it is necessary to find and develop effective methods for treating pharmaceutical wastewater. Industries, especially pharmaceutical ones, must remove harmful substances from the water and reuse it where possible. (6) Strict rules exist around the world for the discharge of industrial wastewater. Pharmaceutical companies must follow these rules to avoid legal action, penalties, and the risk of losing their licenses. (7)
This review will focus on the current wastewater treatment techniques used in the pharmaceutical industry and look at eco-friendly ways to reduce waste and pollution during drug manufacturing. In recent years, billions of people have suffered from water scarcity due to excessive and careless use of water resources. Pharmaceutical industries require a large amount of potable and fresh water for different purposes, like washing of equipment, formulation, and cleaning of the area, etc. The used water contains the pollutants (can be organic or inorganic compounds, API, excipients). (1)
It's necessary to treat it. For that purpose, different techniques out there that remove the pollutants from the water. Some of them are as follows.
Types of Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment Techniques:
AOPs are special chemical methods that produce powerful substances like hydroxyl radicals. These break down harmful pharmaceutical chemicals in the water. Some common AOPs are ozonation, Fenton reaction, UV with hydrogen peroxide, and photocatalysis. They are useful when regular treatment doesn’t work.(8)
In this method, electricity is used to clean the water by producing substances that break down pollutants. It can clean very dirty water, but it uses a lot of energy and may cost more.(9)
This method uses special materials like titanium dioxide and light (UV or sunlight) to break down harmful chemicals. It’s effective, but sometimes the light can’t reach all parts of the water, and removing the catalyst can be hard. (10)
Ozone gas is a strong cleaner that can remove many types of pharmaceutical compounds. It is very effective but can also make unwanted byproducts like bromate, which are harmful.(11)
These are types of AOPs that use iron salts and hydrogen peroxide (with or without UV light) to make strong oxidants. They work well for many pollutants but create iron waste that must be removed.(12)
This process uses heat and pressure with air or oxygen to break down tough pollutants in water. It works well but uses a lot of energy, so it's usually used before other treatments. (13)
MBRs combine regular biological treatment with a filter membrane. Bacteria first remove most of the pollution, and then the membranes filter out tiny particles. This method gives spotless water but can be expensive and needs regular cleaning of membranes.(14)
These are man-made areas that work like natural wetlands. They use plants, soil, and microbes to clean the wastewater. This method is eco-friendly and low-cost, but it's not good for very polluted water unless used with other treatments.(15)
This is a common method where bacteria eat the organic waste in water. It’s simple and low-cost, but many pharmaceutical chemicals do not break down easily this way.(16)
Activated carbon is a type of charcoal that has lots of tiny holes. It can trap leftover pharmaceutical chemicals from water. It’s often used as a final step to make water cleaner. But the carbon gets full over time and needs to be replaced or cleaned.(17)
This uses enzymes (natural proteins) to break down pharmaceutical pollutants. It’s a selective and eco-friendly method, but still needs more research before it can be used widely in industries. (18)
This is a biological method done without oxygen. Microorganisms break down the pollutants and produce biogas. It's useful for very dirty wastewater but may not remove all pharmaceutical compounds.(19)
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Advanced Oxidation Processes are unique water treatments. They use strong chemical reactions to break down tough pollutants. These processes create hydroxyl radicals (OH-). These radicals are very active. They attack and destroy contaminants. They break apart the chemical bonds. AOPs generate these reactive OH- radicals. This happens by mixing oxidants with energy sources. Sources include UV light, ultrasound, or certain metals. These radicals quickly react with organic waste. They change the waste into smaller, safer bits. These smaller bits are easier to break down. Different AOP methods use different oxidants.(20)
Different methods of AOPs also depend upon the oxidising agent used in the respective AOP.
Different methods of AOPs are:
Requirements:
To make AOPs work, you need a few things.
Result:
When AOPs are used correctly, they really work. They remove tough organic pollutants. This includes medicines, pesticides, and dyes. The chemical structure of pollutants is broken. They turn into simple things like water and carbon dioxide. The treated water is less harmful. This also makes the wastewater easier to clean later.(20)
Figure 1: Schematic of an Electrochemical Reactor for Wastewater Treatment
Electrochemical oxidation treats water using electricity. Special electrodes help break down waste. Wastewater moves through a cell with two electrodes. A current creates reactive agents near the anode. These agents attack and change harmful organic compounds. They ideally become carbon dioxide, water, and simple salts. Direct oxidation occurs on the anode. Pollutant molecules touch the anode. They lose electrons and get oxidised. (22)
Requirements:
An electrochemical cell. It must resist corrosion.
Procedure:
Result:
COD and TOC levels drop significantly. This is especially true with BDD or active chlorine. Colours and odours disappear quickly. Pathogens can be killed by the strong oxidants. Little sludge is produced, unlike other methods. Be cautious of by-products in salt water. High currents or long times can create unwanted salts or chlorinated compounds. Monitor and control these. Energy use varies. It depends on current, water conductivity, and waste load. Better cell design lowers energy needs. Pre-treating with this method helps the biological steps. It breaks down tough molecules for easier breakdown later.(23)(9)
Figure 2 : Photocatalytic Reactor for Wastewater Treatment
Photocatalysis is the use of light energy (like sunlight) with a catalyst (e.g., TiO?) to degrade toxic organic and inorganic pollutants in water. The catalyst absorbs light and generates active species. These species then react with the water and oxygen. They create reactive species that attack and degrade pollutants. These substances then convert to harmless by-products, such as CO? and H?O.(24)
Requirements:
Procedure:
Results:
Photocatalysis can significantly reduce or eliminate harmful drugs, dyes, and organic waste. The final products are often safe, e.g., CO?, H?O, and mineral acids.(26) This is an eco-friendly method. It mainly needs only light and a catalyst. No additional toxic chemicals are used. (24) (25)
Figure 3 : Ozonation Process for Wastewater Treatment
Ozonation is a method for treating wastewater. It uses ozone gas. Ozone is a strong oxidiser. It breaks down pollutants. Pollutants are broken down and become smaller, safer pieces. Or they can be broken down by nature. This method removes harmful and toxic chemicals. It also removes bad colour and smells. Even medicine traces can be removed. (26)
Requirements:
Procedure:
Results:
Organic waste, medicines, and dyes break apart. They become smaller or less harmful. Harmful or toxic colours, bad smells, and tastes disappear. Wastewater breaks down more easily. This helps with later cleaning steps. It creates little waste. It is good for the environment.(28) (29)
Figure 4 : Fenton Process Flow Diagram
The Fenton process is an advanced oxidation method. It uses hydrogen peroxide and iron. Ferrous iron acts as a catalyst. This creates very active hydroxyl radicals. These radicals powerfully oxidise organic matter. They break down tough, toxic pollutants. The breakdown yields simple forms like carbon dioxide and water.(30)
Requirements:
Procedure:
Result:
Breakdown of complex pharmaceutical and industrial pollutants. Removal of colour, odour, and reduction in Chemical oxygen demand (COD). Improved biodegradability of wastewater, making it easier for further biological treatment. (30)
Figure 5 : Schematic of Wet Air Oxidation Process
Wet air oxidation is a modern method for treating industrial wastewater. It is effective for waste containing harmful, non-biodegradable organic matter. Pharmaceutical wastewater often falls into this category. This process uses oxygen or air. It oxidises organic and inorganic pollutants in water. This occurs at high temperatures, from 125 to 320°C. High pressure, around 220 bars, is also needed. Many industries now use this technique. (33)
Requirements:
A reactor built for extreme heat and pressure. Air or pure oxygen serves as the oxidant. A system to heat and pressurise the setup is required. A wastewater sample with pollutants is essential. (34)
Procedure:
Results:
It shows significant COD reduction, often 80–90%. Harmful organics transform into biodegradable forms. The final products are safer. These include CO?, H?O, and simple acids.(35)
Figure 6 : Schematic of Membrane Bioreactor System
Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are now preferred over activated sludge processes (ASPs). MBRs are a major advance in treating wastewater. They fix problems with older ASPs. These problems include large space needs for clarifiers. They also fix issues with separating liquids and solids. MBRs also create less sludge. An MBR combines biological treatment with membrane filtration. This filtration physically separates solids from liquids. (36)
Requirements:
An MBR needs key parts. These are a pretreatment screen and biological tanks. It needs anoxic, aerobic, and anaerobic zones. An air blower is also required. Sludge needs to be recycled. Chemical dosing and a cleaning tank are also part of it. Its function relies on pressure known as TMP. Permeability and water flow matter too. Design should focus on the food-to-microorganism ratio. High levels of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) are good. Choosing the right membrane is vital. This helps with cleaning and upkeep. Pretreatment protects membranes from clogging. Ultrasound or ozone can be used. Most membranes are made of polymers. PVDF is a common choice. Composite membranes with special coatings are better. They reduce clogging. The membrane pore size must be right. Smaller pores clog less easily. They are simpler to clean than large pores.(37)
Procedure:
The reactor ran at 30 L/m2/h. Effluent was pumped out. The hydraulic retention time was 19 hours. The organic loading rate was 0.62 kg COD m?³ d?¹. Membranes were backwashed for one minute. This happened every nine minutes of filtering. This occurred throughout the study. The system ran for seven days first. No dyes were added then. Dyes were added for the next thirty days. Influent COD stayed at about 1000 mg/L. Mixed liquor solids were around 8384 mg/L. Volatile solids were about 4916 mg/L. Wastewater pH was between 8.0 and 8.5. The reactor temperature was kept at 20 °C.
Samples were taken every 48 hours. These came from influent, mixed liquor, and permeate. We checked the flow rate and effluent clarity. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) was monitored. Dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH were checked. Conductivity and temperature were also measured. COD and NH?-N were analysed. Sulphates, nitrites, nitrates, and phosphates were measured. ML-TSS and ML-VSS were also measured. Turbidity was checked with a meter. DOC was measured using a TOC analyser. EPS and SMP were extracted. Their protein and carbohydrate content was found. Dye levels were measured using a spectrophotometer. (38)(39)
Result:
The MBR system worked very well. It removed most pollutants. The MBR removed 91% of COD. It removed 97% of dyes. Ammonia removal was 95%. These rates were higher than the control. It also removed more nitrogen and phosphate. The MBR system kept TMP stable. Its effluent was clearer. It clogs less. This was due to lower EPS and SMP levels.(37)
3. Constructed Wetlands:
Figure 7 : Diagram of Constructed Wetland System
The engineered systems are called constructed wetlands, which use natural wetland processes to clean wastewater. Vegetation, soil, and microbes are key. These systems often treat water from cities, farms, and industries. They clean pollutants using settling, filtering, absorbing, plant taking, and microbes breaking down waste.(40)
Requirements:
Constructed wetlands need a sealed basin that stops water from leaking out. A good base material, like gravel or sand, is needed to help plants grow. Proper pipes for water entering and leaving are also important cause they ensure water flows evenly. Plants such as reeds or cattails are important as they absorb nutrients and move oxygen. For good work, wetlands need a specific water flow time. They also need areas with and without oxygen. Sometimes, trash needs pre-filtering. Plant health, soil, and water quality need regular checks. Climate also impacts how well they work. (41)
Procedure:
Wastewater flows into a shallow, sealed pool. This pool holds layers of gravel, sand, and soil. Wetland plants are grown here. They help microbes clean the water. Water spreads evenly at a controlled pace. It moves through the system. Filtering, plant absorption, and microbial action remove waste. Plants are trimmed. Sludge is removed. Water is then collected and tested. This confirms pollutants are reduced.(42)
Result:
These wetlands effectively remove waste. They clean organic matter, solids, and nutrients. Heavy metals and germs are also removed. They can lower COD, BOD, and TSS. This meets water discharge rules. Wetlands also help nature. They offer homes for wildlife. They make places look nicer. They can also store carbon from the air.(41)
4. Activated Sludge Process:
Figure 8 : Flow Diagram of Activated Sludge Process
The activated sludge method is a common biological way to clean wastewater. It uses a mix of tiny life forms. These include bacteria, tiny animal-like cells, fungi, and other small organisms. They form clumps called flocs. These microbes eat up waste. They turn organic matter and pollution (BOD5) into new cell material. This happens with oxygen. This cleans the water. The types and amounts of microbes show how well the system works. Key players are bacteria, tiny cells called ciliates and flagellates, and rotifers. They help remove waste and shape the sludge.(43)
Requirements:
The process needs enough oxygen. It also requires the right balance of food. This includes carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. These feed the microbes. For clean water with oxygen, the food mix should be about 100 parts carbon, 5 parts nitrogen, and 1 part phosphorus. Factors such as pH, temperature, and oxygen levels influence how microbes function. This is true for bacteria that change nitrogen. The effectiveness of nitrogen removal depends on the type of food and environmental conditions. (44)
Procedure:
Wastewater first has solids removed. Then, it goes to a cleaning stage. Here, dirty water mixes with trained microbes. This mix is put into tanks with air. Air is added all the time. This oxygen helps microbes eat. The microbe clumps break down waste. They turn it into more microbe cells. The mixed solids, including the active microbes, are then separated. Some of this sludge is sent back to the start. This keeps the right amount of microbes working. The system runs all the time. The amount of sludge and the amount of waste it produces are controlled. Checking the microbes under a microscope helps monitor the system.(45)
Result:
The process greatly reduces waste. This is seen in BOD5 and COD levels. A healthy microbe mix, with many tiny cells and rotifers, means good cleaning. Water quality is stable. pH is around 7.5. COD, BOD5, and total suspended solids are controlled. Changes from COVID-19 affected the microbes and water. But the process stayed effective. The mix of microbes relates to how steady the cleaning is. Adding special bacteria can help break down sludge. This can reduce total and volatile solids by about 21% and 14%. This works by using enzymes to break down sludge proteins and starches. Best results are at pH 10 and 50 °C for 48 hours.(44)
5. Activated Carbon Adsorption:
Figure 9 : Activated Carbon Filtration System for Wastewater
Activated carbon (AC) is a great adsorbent. It has a large surface area. Its pore structure helps it capture many pollutants. These include CO?, heavy metals, and organic compounds. AC works on gases and liquids. Adsorption depends on surface chemistry. Pore size distribution matters. Operating conditions like temperature and pressure also play a role. Adsorption speed is often explained by models. The Langmuir model and pseudo-second-order model are common. These suggest single-layer chemisorption. They also indicate diffusion-controlled steps.(46)
Requirements:
Materials: Granular activated carbon is needed. It usually has a 20–60 mesh particle size. Chemicals for changing the AC are also required. Ammonium persulfate is an example. The target pollutant, like Cr (VI) or CO?, is also a material.
Reagents: Solutions to control pH are necessary. Nitric acid and sodium hydroxide work. Standard solutions of the pollutant are also needed.
Equipment: A Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area Analyzer is useful. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can analyze functional groups. A pH meter is essential. A mechanical shaker is used for mixing. Filtration equipment is needed. Analytical devices, like ICP-AES for metals, are also required.(47)
Procedure:
Result:
Adsorption capacity increases with higher pressure. It also goes up with higher temperatures. In batch tests, modified AC captured 108.69 mg/g of Cr(VI). Adsorption typically fits the Langmuir model. It also matched the pseudo-second-order speed model. This suggests single-layer chemisorption. The process was endothermic and spontaneous. Efficiency depended on pH, temperature, and initial concentration. Changing the surface and pores greatly improved adsorption.(47)(48)
6. Enzymatic Degradation:
Figure 10 : Diagram of an Enzymatic Degradation System
Enzymes break down large molecules into smaller ones. This process uses enzymes like cellulases and lipases. It is important for recyc
ling materials and cleaning the environment. Microorganisms like bacteria and fungi release these enzymes. Breaking down cellulose needs three key enzymes working together. Each enzyme acts on different parts of the cellulose.(49)Requirements:
Enzymatic breakdown needs specific things. You need the right enzymes in the right amounts. Porcine pancreatin or Rhizopus oryzae lipase are examples. The conditions must also be right. This includes temperature, usually 30–40°C. Buffer solutions, like phosphate buffers, are used. Degradation time is also controlled, perhaps 28 days. Enzymes and buffers should be changed weekly. This keeps the enzymes working well. Lab incubators keep the temperature steady. They also move air around. (50)
Procedure:
A typical process involves several steps. Polymer samples are mixed with enzymes. This happens in a buffer solution at a set temperature. For pig pancreas enzymes, 37°C is common. The buffer and enzyme are changed often. This keeps the enzymes active. Changes are usually made weekly for four weeks. Samples are checked at set times. This might be every 7 days. Appearance and structure changes are noted. Control tests are run too. These tests use no enzyme or just water. This shows the baseline for breakdown.(49)(51)
Result:
Recent studies show clear results. Material samples broke down well. Epoxy-polyurethane lost up to 5% of its weight. This happened with pig pancreas enzymes. The amount of breakdown depends on several factors. These include the enzyme used, its amount, and the conditions. Substrate type also plays a role. Further tests show smaller fragments of material. This happened when enzymes were present and under certain conditions. DNA breakdown tests show similar findings. (50)(51)
7. Anaerobic Digestion:
Figure 11 : Anaerobic Digestion System Diagram
Anaerobic digestion is a natural process. Microbes break down organic matter in the absence of oxygen. This process creates biogas, primarily consisting of methane and carbon dioxide. It also produces digestate. This process helps manage waste. It also recovers energy. It protects the environment too. Four stages make up this process. They are hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis. Each stage uses specific microbes. They break down complex matter into its simpler components. Finally, methane and CO? are made.(52)
Requirements:
Anaerobic digestion requires several things to function effectively. The organic matter needs to be right. It should be rich in carbs, proteins, or fats. Chemical and physical conditions are also key. The pH should be about 6.5 to 7.5. Temperatures can be mesophilic (30–40°C) or thermophilic (50–60°C). The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio matters. Good buffering is also needed. Harmful things like ammonia and excess acids must be controlled. Mixing the contents is important. The time the material stays in the digester is also critical.(53)
Procedure:
The process follows specific steps.
First, the organic matter is readied. Then it is put into the digester. Next, the four biological stages begin. Hydrolysis breaks down large molecules. These are carbs, fats, and proteins. They become smaller units. Acidogenesis changes these units. It makes volatile fatty acids, alcohols, ammonia, and hydrogen. Acetogenesis converts these intermediates. Acetic acid, CO?, and hydrogen are produced. Methanogenesis uses methanogenic archaea. They create methane and CO?. The process variables are watched. This includes pH, temperature, and concentration. Biogas is then collected and used. The leftover digestate is managed.(54)(55)
Result:
Anaerobic Digestion Outcomes Enhanced anaerobic digestion, like in a three-stage reactor, gives better results. Methane output increases by 11–23%. Organic matter reduction is higher. It can be up to 71%. Each reactor stage develops special microbial groups. Both easy and hard-to-break-down wastes are processed better. Overall performance improves. This means higher processing rates. It also means smaller digester sizes are needed. (53) (54)
Applications:
Advantages and Disadvantages:
Table 1: Comparative analysis of Wastewater Treatment Technologies
|
Sr.no. |
Technique |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
1 |
Advanced Oxidation Process
|
Removes hard-to-degrade organics. Hydroxyl radicals ensure fast, clean oxidation. (67) |
High energy and reagent cost. Risk of toxic byproducts.(67) |
|
2 |
Electrochemical Oxidation
|
No chemical reagents needed. Can fully mineralize pollutants.(68) |
High electricity cost. Expensive electrodes wear out. (68) |
|
3 |
Photo Catalysis
|
Uses sunlight or UV. Degrades many organics with little pollution. (69) |
Catalyst deactivation is common. Recovery of the catalyst is difficult. (69) |
|
4 |
Ozonation
|
Strong oxidant for pathogens and organics. Leaves no chemical residue.(70) |
High electricity and ozone generator cost. May form harmful bromates.(70) |
|
5 |
Fenton Process
|
Cheap and efficient at low pH. Fast COD reduction. (71) |
Produces iron sludge. Needs strict pH control. (71) |
|
6 |
Wet Air Oxidation
|
Treats strong, toxic wastewater. No extra chemicals required. (72) |
Requires high pressure and temperature. Corrosion and costly equipment. (72) |
|
7 |
Membrane Bioreactors
|
Produces reusable, high-quality effluent. Smaller footprint than traditional plants. (73) |
Membrane fouling is common. High cost of setup and operation. (73) |
|
8 |
Constructed Wetlands
|
Low-energy, eco-friendly system. Provides habitat and polishing. (74) |
Needs a large land area. Performance varies with climate. (74) |
|
9 |
Activated Sludge Process
|
Well-proven and versatile. Gives good effluent quality.(75) |
High aeration energy cost. Excess sludge production. (75) |
|
10 |
Activated Carbon Adsorption
|
Removes organics and odors effectively. Carbon can be regenerated. (76) |
Carbon replacement is costly. Efficiency drops with high DOC. (76) |
|
11 |
Enzymatic Degradation
|
Selective pollutant breakdown. Eco-friendly, mild conditions. (77) |
Enzymes are costly and unstable. Sensitive to toxins. (77) |
|
12 |
Anaerobic Digestion
|
Produces methane and reduces sludge. Stabilizes waste.(78) |
Long start-up time. Sensitive to the environment and slow to toxins. (78) |
CONCLUSION:
The review article includes information regarding different wastewater treatment techniques that are implemented in pharmaceutical wastewater treatment, highlighting both conventional and advanced techniques. It highlights the growing concern of pharmaceutical pollutants in water sources and the increasing scarcity of water because of the improper disposal of drugs, which poses a threat to health and the environment. The article carefully explains processes like Advanced oxidation and its types, Membrane bioreactors, Enzymatic degradation, Anaerobic digestion, etc., among other things, discussing their principle, requirements, advantages, Limitations, and real-world applications.
It concludes that no single technique is sufficient to remove overall pollutants or hazardous substances from the wastewater; instead, a combination of eco-friendly, cost-effective, and efficient technologies is necessary to deal with vast pharmaceutical pollutants effectively. The future of wastewater management lies in the integration of biological, chemical, and physical methods to maximise efficiency while lowering the cost, energy use, and harmful by-products. Integration of these methods is crucial because one method cannot remove all pollutants; some of them require more than one treatment. This review will serve as a valuable guide in adopting sustainable treatment strategies to protect both humans and the environment.
Abbreviations:
REFERENCES
Pratik Mestry, Halima Malgundkar, Advanced Treatment Techniques for Wastewater from Pharmaceutical Industries: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 10, 1772-1794. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17371045
10.5281/zenodo.17371045