View Article

Abstract

Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) have emerged as a pivotal facet of modern pharmacotherapy, offering a non-invasive route for systemic drug administration while enhancing patient compliance. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the historical evolution of TDDS, detailing its generational advancements and mechanisms of action. Various types of transdermal patches are explored, alongside their technical sophistication, advantages, and disadvantages. Key desirable features for effective transdermal patches are discussed, as well as potential adverse events associated with their use. The paper delves into the intricacies of skin and percutaneous absorption, highlighting the role of penetration enhancers and the multiple factors influencing transdermal permeability, including physiological and formulation characteristics. Conditions favoring and opposing the use of TDDS are examined, with a focus on drug selection, formulation strategies, and preparation methods. Evaluation techniques for assessing TDDS effectiveness are outlined, followed by an exploration of contemporary development approaches and advanced techniques aimed at enhancing TDDS performance. Finally, future directions and challenges facing the field are identified, underscoring the ongoing need for innovation in transdermal delivery technologies.

Keywords

TDDS, Transdermal patches, Different Transdermal Drug Delivery Technologies, Generational Advancements, Topical drug delivery.

Introduction

A transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) is a method of delivering medication through the skin for systemic effects. It typically involves the use of patches that contain a specific dose of the drug, which is absorbed into the bloodstream via the skin. This approach allows for the controlled release of the drug over time, improving patient compliance and minimizing side effects compared to other routes of administration. Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) offer an alternative to oral administration, providing sustained release of therapeutic agents and improving patient compliance.[1] TDDS is especially useful for patients unable to take oral medication, such as those experiencing vomiting or unconsciousness, and bypasses first-pass metabolism, reducing side effects associated with oral drugs.[2] However, TDDS efficacy depends on factors such as skin permeability, which varies among individuals, and the physicochemical properties of the drug.[3] While the market for TDDS is growing, challenges like skin irritation, variability in drug absorption, and optimizing drug delivery rates remain.[4] Adverse Despite progress, there is a gap in understanding how to enhance permeation while reducing adverse reactions. This review aims to explore the present scenario of TDDS, identify its advantages and disadvantages, and propose innovative strategies to optimize drug delivery, ensuring safety and improving clinical outcomes.

  1. Skin Structure and Physiology

The human skin, the largest organ of the body, acts as a protective barrier while enabling transdermal absorption of substances. It comprises three main layers epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis. Each with distinct roles that influence skin function and drug permeability.[5]

    1. Epidermis: A stratified squamous epithelium that varies in thickness from 0.06 mm to 0.8 mm, consisting of layers:
    • Stratum Corneum: The outermost, dead keratinized cells, rich in lipids, provide a waterproof barrier and regulate permeability.
    • Stratum Lucidum: Found mainly in thick skin, it offers additional protection.
    • Stratum Granulosum: Keratinocytes undergo keratinization, enhancing skin defense.
    • Stratum Spinosum & Stratum Basale: These layers house living cells that contribute to cellular renewal and melanin production, protecting against UV radiation. [6], [7]
    1. Dermis: Located beneath the epidermis, the dermis contains dense connective tissue rich in collagen and elastin, and is home to blood vessels, nerves, and skin appendages like sweat glands and hair follicles, playing a critical role in thermoregulation and nutrient supply. [8]
    2. Hypodermis (Subcutaneous Layer): Composed of adipose and connective tissue, it insulates the body, stores energy, and provides cushioning. Larger blood vessels and nerves supply the skin with nutrients.[9], [10]
  1. Skin Physiology

The skin regulates body temperature, contributes to sensory perception, and aids in vitamin D synthesis. The stratum corneum plays a crucial role as a barrier to penetration, yet drug absorption can effectively occur through two primary pathways (Figure-1):

    1. Trans epidermal Pathway

The Trans epidermal pathway involves drug absorption through the skin's outermost layer, the stratum corneum, which acts as a complex multi-layered barrier.[11]  This pathway can be further divided into two distinct routes:

  • Intra-cellular Route: Drugs that are hydrophilic or polar solutes penetrate through corneocytes, the specialized skin cells. This route is effective for substances that can dissolve in water, allowing for their movement directly through the cellular structure.[12]
  • Inter-cellular Route: In contrast, lipophilic or non-polar solutes navigate through the intercellular spaces between the skin cells. This route capitalizes on the continuous fatty matrix that characterizes the skin, enabling the passage of substances that dissolve in fats. [13], [14]
    1. Trans appendageal Pathway

The trans appendageal pathway allows drugs to pass through skin appendages, such as hair follicles and sweat glands. This route is akin to utilizing tiny tunnels within the skin, facilitating the movement of specific substances. [15], [16]

  • Sweat Glands and Hair Follicles: These structures provide alternative channels for drug delivery, potentially enhancing the absorption of certain compounds that may not permeate effectively through the stratum corneum. [17]

Figure 1: The Structure of human skin

  1. Historical Background of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

The way of using the skin as a pathway for delivering medications spans thousands of years, with roots in ancient practices and evolving through modern science.

    1. Ancient Practices
  • Egyptians (4000 BC): Ancient Egyptians harnessed natural substances like henna and kohl for cosmetic and medicinal purposes. The Ebers Papyrus, dating back to 1500 BC, documents various remedies, including treatments for skin wounds using tiger nuts.
  • Galen’s Cold Cream (circa 130-200 AD): The Greek physician Galen formulated one of the first known creams, blending vegetable oil, beeswax, and water, to treat skin ailments.
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine: Ancient Chinese practitioners also recognized the skin's potential for healing, employing herbal plasters and acupuncture to enhance therapeutic effects.[18]
    1. 19th Century Developments
  • Early Transdermal Ointments: The 15th century saw the use of mercury-based ointments, like Unguentum hydrargyri, for syphilis. By the late 1800s, Paul Carl Beiersdorf had developed plaster formulations for skin disorders, including the notable Emplastrum belladonna. [19]
    1. Foundations in the 20th Century
  • Accidental Intoxication Insights: Incidents of skin poisoning, such as with phenol, highlighted the skin's permeability and spurred interest in drug absorption through the skin.
  • First Commercial Product (1950s): Nitrol® (2% Nitroglycerine Ointment) was the first significant transdermal product for angina, paving the way for more refined delivery methods.
  • Transderm Scop® (1979): This was the first effective transdermal patch for scopolamine, successfully minimizing side effects compared to oral medications and proving the viability of the transdermal route for systemic delivery.
  • Expansion of Products (1980s-1990s): Following its success, other products emerged, including Catapres TTS® for hypertension and various hormone patches like Estraderm® and Duragesic® for pain management.[20]
  1. Generation of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems [21], [22]
    1. First Generation: Fundamental Innovations

The first generation of transdermal delivery systems has laid the groundwork for the transdermal patches currently used in clinical practice. These patches are designed as reservoirs, encased with an impermeable backing on one side and an adhesive layer on the other, which contacts the skin.[23] The ideal candidates for first-generation systems are low-molecular-weight, lipophilic compounds that demonstrate efficacy at low doses.[24] Such candidates are preferred particularly when transdermal delivery offers advantages over oral routes, such as low bioavailability, less frequent dosing, and consistent delivery profiles. Despite the initial success and increasing public acceptance, the growth of this generation is anticipated to decline as the availability of suitable drugs diminishes (figure-2).

    1. Second Generation: Enhanced Skin Permeability

The second generation of TDDS recognizes the need for enhanced skin permeability to broaden the range of applicable drugs. This generation employs various methods to disrupt the stratum corneum, thus facilitating drug transport.[25] Techniques such as chemical enhancers, iontophoresis, and non-cavitation ultrasound have been developed, but they often struggle to balance increased permeation with the protection of deeper tissues. For example, chemical enhancers can disrupt the stratum corneum's lipid bilayer but may lead to skin irritation. Iontophoresis employs low-voltage electrical currents to aid drug transport, while ultrasound enhances permeation but risks thermal damage to deeper tissues. Overall, the second generation has primarily advanced the delivery of small molecules, with limited success in macromolecule transport.[26]

    1. Third Generation: Targeted Delivery and Macromolecule Penetration

The third generation represents a significant leap in transdermal technology, focusing on targeted disruption of the stratum corneum while protecting underlying tissues.[27] This generation utilizes innovative techniques such as electroporation, cavitation ultrasound, microneedles, thermal ablation, and microdermabrasion to deliver macromolecules, including therapeutic proteins and vaccines, effectively through the skin.[28] By localizing the effects to the stratum corneum, these methods allow for more aggressive strategies that enhance drug delivery without compromising safety.

Microneedles are a noteworthy advancement in this generation. These micro-structured devices can painlessly penetrate the skin, enabling the delivery of a variety of compounds, from small molecules to proteins and vaccines. They have been shown to achieve therapeutic levels in clinical trials, demonstrating their potential for effective transdermal drug delivery.[29]

Figure 2: Generations of TDDS.

  1. Transdermal Patches in the Present Scenario

Transdermal drug delivery (TDD) has seen substantial growth in recent years, becoming a key focus in non-invasive drug administration. Currently, more than 35 TDD products are available in the U.S. market, and there are around 16 distinct active ingredients that have been officially approved for use in transdermal delivery systems worldwide.[30]  This rise is fueled by the demand for convenient, effective alternatives to oral and injectable drugs, offering steady, controlled drug release directly through the skin. [31]

These patches cover a range of therapeutic areas, with products for pain management, hormone therapy, cardiovascular issues, and more. Each product is tailored for specific conditions, and marketed under familiar brand names that reflect the system’s purpose and benefits. As the popularity of TDD continues to grow, we can expect more innovations to address both existing and emerging therapeutic needs, demonstrating TDD's potential in modern medicine. [32], [33]

  1. Mechanism of Transdermal Permeation [34], [35]

It refers to the movement of drug molecules into and within the biological environment, involving various processes of drug transport across cell membranes.

  • Passive Diffusion          
    1. Fick's Law of Diffusion governs passive diffusion, where drugs move from an area of higher concentration to a lower concentration:

J= -D×dCdx

 

Were,

  • Flux (J): Represents the quantity of drug that permeates through a unit area over a specific time.
  • Diffusion Coefficient (D): Reflects how easily the drug can move through the skin.
  • Concentration Gradient dCdx
    : The difference in drug concentration across the skin layers.
    1. Factors Influencing Diffusion:
  • Molecular Size: Smaller molecules generally have higher permeability. Molecules larger than 500 Da often face challenges in penetrating the stratum corneum.
  • Lipophilicity: Drugs that are lipophilic (fat-loving) tend to partition into the lipid-rich stratum corneum more effectively than hydrophilic drugs.
  • Solubility: A drug’s solubility in both the formulation and the lipid matrix of the skin is critical for effective permeation. [36], [37]
    1. Pathways of Drug Permeation

Drug permeation can occur through distinct pathways:

A. Lipid Pathway

  • Mechanism: Lipophilic drugs must partition into and diffuse through the lipid-rich bilayers of the stratum corneum.
  • Barrier Role: The organized lipid structure presents a significant barrier, requiring drugs to navigate through multiple layers.[38]

B. Aqueous Pathway

  • Mechanism: For hydrophilic drugs, permeation occurs through the aqueous channels found between keratinocytes. This pathway is less prominent but crucial for smaller, hydrophilic molecules.
  • Role of Intercellular Spaces: Water-filled channels allow for some penetration, though they cannot accommodate larger molecules. [39]
  1. Types of Transdermal Patches
    1. Single-layer Drug-in-Adhesive:

In this configuration, the adhesive layer integrates the drug directly within it. The dual role of the adhesive is to ensure adherence to the skin and to control drug release. The rate of drug diffusion is influenced by various factors, including the skin's permeability and the adhesive's properties. This simple design is advantageous for ease of manufacturing and application (figure-3).[40]

    1. Multi-layer Drug-in-Adhesive:

Building on the single-layer model, the multi-layer drug-in-adhesive patch includes additional layers, which may consist of membranes or extra drug-containing adhesive layers. This complexity allows for differentiated drug release profiles, enabling both rapid and sustained release phases. Such designs enhance the versatility of dosing regimens and can improve patient compliance. [41]

    1. Reservoir System:

The reservoir patch distinguishes itself by featuring a dedicated compartment for the drug and is generally available in a liquid or gel format. A semi-permeable membrane controls the drug's release rate, facilitating zero-order kinetics, where a constant amount of drug is delivered over time. This system's ability to maintain stable serum drug levels makes it ideal for chronic conditions, with examples including Duragesic® and Estraderm®. [42]

    1. Matrix System:

 In matrix systems, the drug is evenly dispersed within a polymer matrix, allowing for controlled release. This category can be further divided into:

    1. Drug-in-Adhesive System:

The adhesive layer incorporates the drug, providing both adhesion and a drug reservoir in a single formulation.

    1. Matrix-Dispersion System:

The active pharmaceutical ingredient is uniformly integrated with hydrophilic or hydrophobic polymers, forming a medicated disk mounted on an impermeable backing layer. The surrounding adhesive rim ensures the patch remains secure during use.[43]

    1. Vapour Patch:

Vapour patches are a novel innovation in transdermal delivery, designed to release essential oils for therapeutic effects, such as decongestion or sleep improvement. These patches not only adhere to the skin but also serve as a delivery mechanism for volatile compounds, making them suitable for users seeking alternative or adjunct therapies.[44]

    1. Micro-reservoir System:

 Combining elements of both reservoir and matrix systems, the micro reservoir design consists of drug particles suspended in a polymer matrix. The resulting formulation creates unreachable, microscopic drug reservoirs, allowing for controlled release while enhancing the skin's absorption capabilities. This approach provides a promising solution for delivering a wide range of therapeutic agents.[45]

Figure 3: Types of Transdermal Patches.

  1. Advantages of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]
    1. Avoiding First-Pass Metabolism
    2. Controlled and Sustained Drug Release
    3. Enhanced Patient Compliance
    4. Reduced Gastrointestinal Irritation
    5. Non-Invasive Administration
    6. Targeted Drug Delivery
    7. Stability in Plasma Drug Concentration
    8. Cost-Effectiveness
  2. Disadvantages of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57]
    1. Physicochemical Requirements
    2. Limited Dosage Capacity
    3. Skin Compatibility Issues
    4. Variability in Skin Barrier
    5. Limited Therapeutic Efficacy
    6. Inflammation Risks
  3. Adverse Effects of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems[58]
  1. Skin Reactions:

Skin irritation is a common issue with TDDS, presenting symptoms such as redness, itching, and burning.

  1. Allergic Reactions:

Allergic responses can occur due to components in the patch, including adhesives and active ingredients. Symptoms may range from localized rashes to more widespread hives, often requiring the patch to be removed.

  1. Overdose Risks:

The continuous delivery of medications, particularly potent opioids like fentanyl, raises concerns about systemic overdose. Signs of overdose can include nausea, vomiting, sedation, and serious respiratory issues.

  1. Variable Drug Delivery:

Drug absorption through the skin varies due to factors like skin thickness, hydration, and temperature. This variability can lead to inconsistent therapeutic.

Table No. 1: List of Drugs Used in Transdermal Patches: Pharmacological Category, Formulation Type, and Clinical Applications

Sr. No.

Drug

Pharmacological Category

Formulation Type

Clinical Application

1

Nicotine

Smoking cessation agent

Matrix Patch

Smoking cessation

2

Fentanyl

Opioid analgesic

Reservoir Patch

Pain management

3

Hormones (e.g., Estradiol)

Hormone

Matrix or Reservoir Patch

Hormone replacement therapy

4

Scopolamine

Anticholinergic

Matrix Patch

Motion sickness

5

Clonidine

Alpha-2 adrenergic agonist

Matrix Patch

Hypertension treatment

6

Nitroglycerin

Nitrate vasodilator

Reservoir Patch

Angina pectoris

7

Testosterone

Androgen

Matrix Patch

Hormone replacement therapy

8

Rivastigmine

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor

Reservoir Patch

Alzheimer's disease

9

Capsaicin

Analgesic (topical)

Matrix Patch

Pain relief (topical)

10

Lidocaine

Local anesthetic

Matrix Patch

Local anesthesia

  1. Factors Influencing Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64]
    1. Physicochemical Factors
  • Partition Coefficient: A higher partition coefficient (≥1) facilitates optimal permeability of drugs through the skin, as the drug transitions from the formulation to the lipid-rich skin environment.
  • Skin Hydration: Hydrated skin reduces the barrier function of the stratum corneum, enhancing drug absorption.
  • Temperature and pH: Elevated skin temperature increases drug diffusion, while optimized pH conditions promote better drug permeability by affecting ionization.
  • Drug Concentration and Molecular Size: A higher concentration gradient facilitates drug absorption, and smaller molecules generally permeate more easily than larger ones.
    1. Biological Factors
  • Skin Condition and Blood Flow: Damaged skin and variations in blood flow can significantly influence drug absorption rates.
  • Skin Metabolism: Active metabolism in the skin can modify the drug’s efficacy by activating or deactivating certain compounds.
    1. Formulation-Related Factors
  • Release Characteristics and Penetration Enhancers: The drug’s release rate, affected by solubility and formulation composition, is critical for ensuring controlled drug delivery. Penetration enhancers, such as surfactants, can help improve absorption by altering the skin's barrier.
    1. Environmental Factors
  • External Influences and Seasonal Changes: Sun exposure, pollution, and seasonal changes can alter skin permeability, emphasizing the need for formulation adjustments under different environmental conditions.

Figure 4: Factors Influencing TDDS.

  1. Components of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
    1. Drug

The drug used in transdermal systems is often selected for its ability to bypass first-pass metabolism and its compatibility with transdermal delivery requirements. Ideal properties include a molecular weight of less than 500 Da, an affinity for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic phases, a low melting point, and non-irritating, and non-allergic characteristics. The drug's log partition coefficient should be between 1 and 4, with a solubility greater than 1 mg/mL within a pH range of 5.0 to 9.0.[65]

    1. Adhesives

Pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) are critical for maintaining close contact between the patch and the skin. They must be easily attachable and removable without causing irritation. The adhesive should not interfere with drug permeation and must be compatible with other components.[66]

    1. Membrane

The polymer matrix regulates drug release and can be prepared by dispersing the drug in a synthetic polymer. Polymers should be biocompatible, chemically compatible with the drug, and maintain consistent drug delivery throughout the shelf life. Common polymers include natural options (e.g., cellulose derivatives) and synthetic elastomers (e.g., polybutadiene). [67]

    1. Backing Laminates

Backing films provide stability, protect the active layer, and regulate skin permeation. They must be chemically resistant and compatible with excipients to prevent leaching. Ideal materials include flexible, impermeable substances like vinyl, polyethylene, and polyester.[68]

    1. Other Excipients
      1. Permeation Enhancers: They are compounds that improve the permeability of the stratum corneum, facilitating better drug delivery (e.g., DMSO).
      2. Plasticizers: Enhance flexibility and tensile strength, influencing drug release and permeability. (e.g., Dibutyl phthalate).
      3. Solvents: These are used to improve drug solubility. Examples include methanol and propylene glycol (e.g., Chloroform, and Acetone).
      4. Surfactants: Modify transport pathways for hydrophilic drugs, balancing penetration enhancement with irritation potential (e.g., Span 20 and Span 80). [69], [70]
    2. Release Liner

This protective layer is removed before patch application. It must be chemically inert and allow permeation of the drug and enhancers while preventing moisture ingress.[71]

  1. Penetration Enhancers in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

Penetration enhancers, or permeation enhancers, are substances that enhance the penetration of active compounds through the skin by temporarily altering the stratum corneum. This enhancement allows for improved delivery of topical medications into the bloodstream.[72]

    1. Drug Penetration Mechanisms

Drug penetration through the skin involves several pathways, including:

  1. Hair Follicular Penetration
  2. Trans corneal Penetration
  3. Intracellular Route
  4. Transcellular Route
    1. Types of Penetration Enhancers [38]
  1. Chemical Enhancers
    • Fatty Acids: (e.g., oleic acid) disrupt the lipid bilayer to enhance permeability.
    • Surfactants: (e.g., polysorbates) reduce surface tension and aid in drug penetration.
    • Alcohols: (e.g., ethanol) dehydrate the stratum corneum, facilitating absorption.
    • Amino Acids/Peptides: Improve solubility and absorption of peptide-based drugs.
    • Glycols: (e.g., propylene glycol) serve as solvents that enhance drug solubility.
  2. Physical Enhancers [73]
    • Microneedles: Create microchannels for drug delivery, effective for both small and large molecules.
    • Iontophoresis: It uses electric current to transfer charged medications through the skin.
    • Sonophoresis: Applies ultrasound to create temporary pores, increasing permeability.
    • Thermal Methods: Heating enhances blood flow and disrupts skin barriers.

Figure 5: Ideal Characteristics of Drug

Table No. 2: Ideal Properties of Drug

Parameter

Properties

Dose

Less than 20 mg/day

Molecular weight

Less than 1000 Dalton

Melting point

Less than 200°C

Half-life

Less than 10 hours

Shelf life

Up to 2 years

Partition coefficient

1 to 4

Aqueous solubility

Greater than 1mg/mL

pH of the aqueous saturated solution

5-9

Skin permeability coefficient

Greater than 0.5×10-3cm/h

Skin reaction

Non-irritating and non-sensitizing

Oral bioavailability

Low

Figure 6: Clinical Conditions Supporting and Limiting Transdermal Patch Utilization

  1. Methods for Preparation of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
    1. Asymmetric TPX Membrane Method

This method involves fabricating a prototype patch using a heat-sealable polyester film (type 1009, 3M) with a 1 cm diameter concave as the backing membrane. A drug sample is dispensed into this concave, covered with a TPX poly (4-methyl-1-pentene) asymmetric membrane, and sealed using an adhesive. The TPX membrane is prepared through a dry/wet inversion process, where TPX is dissolved in a solvent mixture at 60°C, followed by casting on a glass plate and coagulating in a bath maintained at 25°C.[78]

    1. Circular Teflon Mold Method

In this approach, polymer solutions in various ratios are dissolved in an organic solvent. A calculated amount of drug is dissolved in half of the solvent, while enhancers are dissolved in the other half. Di-N-butyl phthalate is added as a plasticizer to the drug-polymer solution. The combined mixture is stirred for 12 hours and then poured into a circular Teflon mold. These molds are placed on a leveled surface and covered with an inverted funnel to control solvent vaporization in a laminar flow hood at an air speed of 0.5 m/s. After allowing the solvent to evaporate for 24 hours, the dried films are stored in a desiccator containing silica gel for an additional 24 hours to eliminate aging effects. [79]

    1. Mercury Substrate Method

In this method, the drug is dissolved in a polymer solution that includes a plasticizer. This mixture is stirred for 10-15 minutes to achieve a homogeneous dispersion, which is then poured onto a levelled mercury surface. An inverted funnel is used to control solvent evaporation, allowing for efficient film formation.[80]

    1. IPM Membranes Method

The drug is dispersed in a mixture of water and propylene glycol containing Carbomer 940 polymer and stirred for 12 hours using a magnetic stirrer. The dispersion is neutralized with triethanolamine to enhance viscosity. A buffer with a pH of 7.4 can be used to achieve a gel-like consistency, particularly when drug solubility in aqueous solutions is poor. This gel is subsequently incorporated into the IPM membrane.[81]

    1. EVAC Membranes Method

To create a transdermal therapeutic system, a 1% Carbopol reservoir gel, polyethylene (PE), and ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVAC) membranes serve as rate control membranes. For drugs insoluble in water, propylene glycol is used to prepare the gel. The drug is dissolved in propylene glycol, mixed with Carbopol resin, and neutralized with a 5% w/w sodium hydroxide solution. The drug in gel form is then placed on a backing layer and covered with a rate-controlling membrane, with edges sealed by heat to form a leak-proof device. [82]

    1. Aluminum Backed Adhesive Film Method

This method is particularly suitable for drugs with a loading dose greater than 10 mg, as it helps avoid unstable matrices. Chloroform is the solvent of choice, dissolving both the drug and adhesive. The drug is combined with the adhesive material in chloroform, and a custom-made aluminum former is lined with aluminum foil and sealed with cork blocks.

    1. Preparation of TDDS Using Proliposomes

Proliposomes are prepared via the carrier method using a film deposition technique. An optimized ratio of drug and lecithin (0.1:2.0) is employed. Mannitol powder (5 mg) is placed in a round-bottom flask, heated to 60-70°C, and dried under vacuum for 30 minutes. The drug and lecithin are dissolved in an organic solvent mixture. Aliquots of this solution are introduced into the flask, and following complete drying, the proliposomes are lyophilized, stored in a desiccator, and sieved through a 100-mesh screen. [83]

    1. Free Film Method

This method involves casting a free film of cellulose acetate on a mercury surface. A 2% w/w polymer solution is prepared using chloroform, with plasticizers incorporated at 40% w/w of the polymer weight. The polymer solution is poured into a glass ring on the mercury surface, and the solvent evaporation is controlled by an inverted funnel. After complete evaporation, the dry film is separated and stored in a desiccator between sheets of wax paper. [84]

    1. Simple Method of Preparing Transdermal Patches

The preparation of TDDS is modified from earlier reported methods using a solvent casting approach. A polymer (e.g., PVP/HPMC) is mixed with a minimum quantity of solvent, followed by the addition of other polymers (e.g., PVA) and thorough stirring. A plasticizer is incorporated, and the drug is added with continuous agitation. The resultant films are cast onto a glass mold and dried in an oven at 40°C. After drying, the films are carefully removed, wrapped in butter paper, and stored in a cool, light-protected environment.

  1. Evaluation Methods for Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
    1. Physical Appearance:

Each patch undergoes visual inspection for color, clarity, transparency, flexibility, and surface smoothness, all crucial for product uniformity and quality assurance.[85]

    1. Interaction Studies:

To ensure excipient compatibility with the drug, analytical methods like thermal analysis, Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, UV spectroscopy, and chromatography are employed. These helps detect possible physical or chemical interactions, thus preserving the drug’s stability and bioavailability.[86]

    1. Thickness Measurement:

Measured at multiple points using a micrometer, uniform patch thickness ensures consistent drug release and dosage. [87]

    1. Folding Endurance

A strip of the patch is repeatedly folded up to 300 times until it breaks, measuring its flexibility a key property for body movement adaptability.[88]

    1. Weight Uniformity:

After drying, patches are weighed to confirm uniform drug distribution. Variability should remain within acceptable limits, ensuring dose consistency. [89]

    1. Moisture Content and Uptake:

Moisture content and absorption are evaluated by exposing patches to controlled humidity levels. Moisture content is determined by placing patches in a desiccator, while uptake is assessed by re-weighing patches exposed to high humidity. [90]

%Moisture Content= Initial Weight-Final WeightInitial Weight×100

    1. Water Vapor Permeation (WVP) Test:

Patches are sealed over vials containing calcium chloride and kept at 63% relative humidity. Weight changes after 72 hours assess the patch’s permeability to moisture, essential for product stability.[91]

WVP= ?WA?t

Were,

  • ΔW = Weight change (g)
  • A = Surface area of the patch (cm²)
  • t = Time (hours)
    1. Drug Content Analysis:

To ensure accurate drug loading, patches are dissolved in solvents (e.g., methanol or phosphate buffer) and analyzed via UV or HPLC techniques.[92]

    1. Polariscopic Examination:

Polariscopic microscopy determines whether the drug remains crystalline or transforms to an amorphous form in the patch, impacting stability and release profile.[93]

    1. Flatness Test:

Flatness is assessed by measuring strips from different patch areas. Zero constriction indicates uniform flatness, a quality essential for even adhesion to the skin. [94]

    1. Tensile Strength:

This test, often performed with a universal testing machine, measures the force required to break the patch, indicating its durability and mechanical strength. [95]

    1. Adhesion and Tack Tests
    1. Shear Adhesion Test:

Measures the time a patch holds under a specific weight on a smooth surface, indicating adhesive strength.

    1. Peel Adhesion Test:

The force to remove a patch from a steel surface at a 180-degree angle, testing adhesive durability.

    1. Rolling Ball Tack Test:

Measures the distance a steel ball travels on the adhesive surface, indicating quick adhesion.

    1. Thumb Tack and Quick Stick Tests:

These tests measure the ease of separating a thumb or probe from the adhesive, providing tack values crucial for user application.

    1. Probe Tack Test:

A probe contacts the adhesive surface; the force to separate the probe is recorded as tack, reflecting quick adherence. [96]

    1. In Vitro Release Study:

Using a USP dissolution apparatus, patches are tested in a buffer at body temperature, and drug release is measured over 24 hours. This ensures controlled and sustained drug delivery.

    1. Stability Studies:

Patches are stored at high temperatures and humidity according to ICH guidelines, with periodic assessments over six months to verify long-term stability. [97]

    1. In Vitro Permeation Studies

In vitro permeation studies evaluate drug release and absorption through the skin, providing an initial indication of the formulation’s in vivo behavior.[98], [99]

    1. Diffusion Cells:

Typically employing Franz or flow-through diffusion cells, these studies simulate the permeation environment with a donor compartment (holding the patch) and a receptor compartment (buffer solution) with constant stirring to ensure uniform drug distribution.

    1. Skin Samples:

Skin from animals (e.g., rats or pigs) or synthetic membranes with properties mimicking human skin are commonly used, with the epidermal side facing the patch to simulate skin application.

    1. Controlled Conditions:

The system is maintained at 32°C to replicate human skin temperature, with samples collected periodically from the receptor compartment over 24 hours for analysis.

    1. Analysis

Samples are analyzed via UV spectrophotometry or HPLC to determine cumulative drug release, permeation rate, and permeability coefficient. Flux is calculated from the steady-state slope of drug permeation versus time.[100]

    1. In Vivo Studies

In vivo studies assess the TDDS’s actual performance within a living system, considering absorption, metabolism, and excretion.

  1. Animal Models:

Before human trials, animal models (e.g., hairless mice, rats, or rabbits) provide initial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The TDDS is applied to the skin, and blood or tissue samples are collected at intervals to study bioavailability and absorption rates.[101]

  1. Human Studies:

In clinical trials, patches are applied to human subjects, measuring pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy. Plasma drug levels indicate how efficiently the drug enters systemic circulation, with side effects and compliance closely monitored.

  1. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data:

Human studies provide unique insights into individual variations in drug absorption and metabolism. These results inform therapeutic effectiveness, dosing, and action duration.

  1. Clinical Implications:

Clinical trials validate that the TDDS can achieve therapeutic drug levels with minimized side effects, often using crossover studies to compare the transdermal route’s advantages over alternative administration forms.[102]

Table No. 3: Evaluation Methods with United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Limits for Patches.

Sr. No.

Evaluation Method

United States Pharmacopeia Limits

  1.  

Physical Appearance

Clear, no discolouration; flexible, smooth

  1.  

Interaction Studies

No detectable interaction impacting drug bioavailability

  1.  

Thickness Measurement

±10% variation in thickness

  1.  

Folding Endurance

Minimum 100 folds, ideal 300

  1.  

Weight Uniformity

±5% weight variation

  1.  

Moisture Content and Uptake

Moisture content ≤5%, uptake ≤10%

  1.  

Water Vapor Permeation (WVP) Test

WVP ≤0.05 g/24 hrs./cm² at 63% RH

  1.  

Drug Content Analysis

90-110% of labelled drug content

  1.  

Polariscopic Examination

No crystalline content if amorphous form is intended

  1.  

Flatness Test

Maximum variation ≤1 mm

  1.  

Tensile Strength

Tensile strength ≥5 N/cm²

  1.  

Adhesion and Tack Tests

  1. Shear Adhesion Test

≥50 g/cm²

  1. Peel Adhesion Test

≥100 g/cm² at 180° angle

  1. Rolling Ball Tack Test

<2 cm

  1. Thumb Tack Test

Easy separation of tack

  1. Probe Tack Test

Reflects quick adherence

  1.  

In Vitro Release Study

≥80% release within 24 hours

  1.  

Stability Studies

≤5% degradation at 40°C, 75% RH after 6 months

  1.  

In Vitro Permeation Studies

≥50% drug release within 24 hours

  1.  

In Vivo Studies

≥80% bioavailability within 24 hours

  1. Different Transdermal Drug Delivery Technologies

Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) have gained prominence due to their ability to facilitate effective medication administration while minimizing invasive procedures. Several innovative technologies have emerged, each with unique mechanisms and applications.

    1. Thermal Ablation

Thermal ablation, also known as thermophoresis, utilizes targeted heat to disrupt the stratum corneum, thereby creating microchannels that enhance drug permeability. Achieving temperatures above 100 °C is crucial for vaporizing keratin and altering the skin's structure.[103] This technique can be executed using various thermal energy sources, such as lasers and radiofrequency devices. By carefully adjusting parameters like wavelength and exposure duration, practitioners can control the depth and extent of skin ablation, significantly improving drug delivery efficiency.[104], [105]

    1. Microneedles

Microneedle technology represents a groundbreaking method in transdermal delivery, employing micron-sized needles to penetrate the skin's outer layer. These needles, typically measuring 25 to 2000 μm in height, allow for the direct administration of medications into the dermal capillaries, thus enhancing absorption while reducing pain. The success of this approach hinges on optimizing the geometry of microneedles to ensure they reach the target without contacting nerve endings. They are generally arranged in arrays to maximize skin contact and drug delivery.[106], [107], [108]

    1. Jet Injectors

Needle-free jet injectors propel liquid formulations through narrow nozzles, ranging from 50 to 360 μm in diameter.[109] This method eliminates concerns associated with needle disposal and injury, although risks of cross-contamination from the nozzle remain. Solid jet injectors utilize compressed gas to deliver powdered medications, creating Micro perforation in the skin that facilitate drug absorption. Key factors influencing drug distribution include particle size and impact velocity, which are critical for achieving effective delivery of specific therapeutics.[51], [110]

Figure 7: Different Transdermal Drug Delivery System

  1. Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

Recent innovations in transdermal patch technology are transforming how medications are delivered, enhancing both patient comfort and treatment efficacy.  Here are some notable advancements in this field:

    1. Protein Delivery Systems:

New patches are now capable of delivering protein-based therapies effectively. This is particularly important since proteins are often too large to penetrate the skin easily.[111] By improving the technology behind these patches, researchers are making it possible to treat various conditions with protein drugs that were previously difficult to administer.[112]

    1. Pain-Free Diabetes Monitoring:

Transdermal patches are being developed for continuous glucose monitoring, offering a pain-free alternative for those managing diabetes.[113] These patches allow for real-time data collection without the need for finger pricks, making diabetes management more comfortable and less invasive. [114], [115]

    1. Hormonal Therapy for Women:

A groundbreaking testosterone transdermal patch has been created for young women experiencing spontaneous premature ovarian failure.[116]  This non-invasive approach provides a reliable method for hormone replacement therapy, helping to improve the quality of life while minimizing potential side effects often associated with oral medications. [117]

    1. Overactive Bladder Management:

Transdermal patches containing Oxybutynin are now being used to treat overactive bladder (OAB). [118] These patches deliver a consistent dose of medication, which simplifies the treatment regimen and helps improve adherence by reducing the frequency of doses needed throughout the day. [119], [120]

  1. Patents Granted on Transdermal Drug Delivery System

Numerous patents have been granted to researchers in the field of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) due to their clinical utility. The table below presents a selection of significant patents.

Sr. No.

Patent Number

Title

Inventor

Key Innovation

Year

Reference

  1.  

US3598122A

Bandage for administering drugs

Alejandro Zaffaroni

First transdermal patch system with a drug reservoir and semi-permeable membrane for controlled delivery

1971

[121]

  1.  

US-4668232-A

Transdermal drug patches

 

Ginter Cordes, Michael Wolff

Pioneering work on drug patches, including adhesives and drug formulations for enhanced drug delivery.

1987

[122]

  1.  

US4839174A

 

Novel transdermal nicotine patch

Richard W. Baker, Frank Kochinke, Carl Huang

Transdermal nicotine patch for smoking cessation therapy.

1989

[123]

  1.  

US 5008110A

Storage-Stable Transdermal Patch

Arnold G. Benecke, Daniel J. Kinne, Andrew J. Wnuk

Development of a storage-stable transdermal patch, addressing stability issues and ensuring consistent drug delivery.

1991

[124]

  1.  

US-5232702-A

Silicone pressure sensitive adhesive compositons for transdermal drug delivery devices and related medical devices

William R. Pfister, Jeniffer M. Wilson

Innovative silicone-based adhesives designed for use in transdermal patches and medical devices.

1993

[125]

  1.  

US5262165A

Transdermal Nitroglycerin patch with penetration enhancers

Sharad K. Govil, Edward M. Rudnic, Dale G. Sterner

Transdermal patch for nitroglycerin, using penetration enhancers for improved drug absorption

1993

[126]

  1.  

US-5290561-A

Single layer transdermal drug administration system

Bahram Farhadieh, Rajeev D. Gokhale

Simplified single-layer patch design for efficient drug delivery and reduced production complexity.

1994

[127]

  1.  

US-5486362-A

Controlled, sustained release delivery system for treating drug dependency

 

Judith P. Kitchell, Indu A. Muni, Yvonne N. Boyer

Sustained-release system for drug dependency treatment with controlled release mechanisms.

1996

[128]

  1.  

US-5703101-A

Agonist-antagonist combination to reduce the use of nicotine and other drugs

 

Jed E. Rose, Edward D. Levin

Innovative combination of agonists and antagonists for drug addiction and smoking cessation therapy.

1997

[129]

  1.  

US-5721257-A

Method and therapeutic system for smoking cessation

 

Richard W. Baker, Giancarlo Santus, Susan Vintilla-Friedman

Advanced system focusing on effective smoking cessation strategies.

1998

[130]

  1.  

US5869090A

 

Transdermal delivery of dehydroepiandrosterone

Jerry Rosenbaum

Development of a TDDS for dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a hormone with potential therapeutic uses.

1999

[131]

  1.  

US-5948433-A

Transdermal patch

 

Scott Allison Burton, Shahnaz Tata

Transdermal patch design with improved adhesive and drug stabilization properties.

1999

[132]

  1.  

US-7642232-B2

Compositions and methods for the prevention and control of insulin-induced hypoglycemia

Daniel T. Green, Robert R. Henry

Systems to prevent hypoglycemia caused by insulin treatment through innovative transdermal delivery.

2010

[133]

  1.  

US8197844-B2

Active electrode for transdermal medicament administration

Jamal S. Yanaki

Active electrode design enhancing the precision of transdermal drug delivery.

2012

[134]

  1.  

US-8641689-B2

Transdermal porator and patch system and method for using same

Bernadette Messier, Zoran Novakovic, Jeremiah Peter O'Leary

Integration of porators with patches to improve the efficiency of drug absorption.

2014

[135]

  1.  

US-9056061-B2

Transdermal nicotine salt delivery system

Robert M. Gale, Jay Audett, Rama V. Padmanabhan

Advanced nicotine salt delivery system improving stability and absorption.

2015

[136]

  1.  

US-10556106-B2

System and method for biphasic transdermal iontophoretic delivery of therapeutic agents for the control of addictive cravings

 

Mir A. Imran, Talat Imran, Mir Hashim

Innovative biphasic iontophoretic delivery system for addressing addictive cravings.

2020

[137]

  1.  

US-11129975-B2

Transdermal delivery of high viscosity bioactive agents

Russell F. Ross

Method for transdermal administration of bioactive agents with high viscosity.

2021

[138]

  1.  

CA-2955247-C

Abuse deterrent opiod/opiod-antagonist transdermal patch

 

Audra Lynn Stinchcomb, Dana Carmel Hammell, Stan Lee Banks, Josh ELDRIDGE, Miroslaw Jerzy Golinski

Abuse-deterrent patch combining opioids and antagonists to prevent misuse and ensure controlled release.

2023

[139]

  1.  

US11648214-B2

Systems and methods for long term transdermal administration

Eun Soo Lee, Amit K. Jain, Parminder Singh

Systems enabling sustained and long-term drug administration through transdermal patches

2023

[140]

 

  1.  

US11911522-B2

Process for the continuous manufacture of a polyisobutylene based transdermal patch

Russell Adam Baird, Brad L. Barnett, Russell D. Beste

Continuous production process for polyisobutylene-based transdermal systems ensuring scalability.

2024

[141]

  1.  

US-11938160-B2

Pharmaceutical composition and method of manufacturing

Gary J. Speier

Improved composition and manufacturing methods for advanced transdermal patches.

2024

[142]

19. Future Innovations in Transdermal Drug Delivery Technologies

The future of transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) is promising, with advancements aimed at overcoming traditional challenges like low drug solubility and skin permeability.[143] New formulation techniques, such as liposomes and microemulsions, are improving the delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Innovations in patch design are expected to boost the popularity of transdermal analgesics, while technologies that leverage mechanical energy, like iontophoresis, electroporation, sonophoresis, and thermal energy, are enhancing drug delivery by modifying the skin barrier or boosting drug molecule energy.[144]

The TDDS market is growing rapidly, projected to reach $2 billion, with a 25% annual growth rate. Microneedle technology, such as the NanoPatch®, is showing promise for single-dose vaccine delivery.[145] Advances like thermal poration, jet injectors, and micro-infusion systems are further improving drug delivery efficiency. Companies like Trans Pharma and Altea Therapeutics are developing products to enhance patient compliance, focusing on sustained-release formulations and innovative vaccination methods. [146]

20. Challenges

Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) face numerous challenges that can impact their effectiveness and acceptance by patients. A primary concern is the skin's natural barrier function, particularly the stratum corneum, which restricts the absorption of larger molecules and hydrophilic drugs.[147]  This limitation narrows the scope of medications suitable for transdermal application, often leaving out vital treatments. Moreover, variations in skin properties among individuals such as thickness, temperature, and hydration can lead to unpredictable absorption rates, complicating dosing and therapeutic outcomes.[148]

Formulation stability is another pressing issue; many active ingredients can degrade due to environmental factors like light and humidity, leading to a potential loss of efficacy over time. [149] Additionally, patient compliance can suffer due to skin irritation or allergic reactions from adhesives or drug compounds, making it difficult to ensure consistent usage.[150] The regulatory environment further complicates the landscape, as manufacturers must navigate rigorous approval processes that require comprehensive safety and efficacy data. These multifaceted challenges underscore the need for ongoing research and innovation to improve the design and functionality of TDDS, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and acceptance.[151], [152], [153], [154]

      1. CONCLUSION

Transdermal drug delivery systems are one of the significant advances in modern medicine, being a patient-friendly and efficient alternative to the traditional drug delivery methods. The review discusses the evolution, mechanisms, types, and applications of TDDS with advantages and limitations. This also includes complex issues on skin permeability, formulation strategies, and advanced technologies, which might make TDDS a possible revolution in pharmacotherapy. Despite these challenges, which include adverse effects, continuous innovation and research may be able to overcome them. TDDS represents the best example of science and technology fusion into the creation of more efficient and convenient drug delivery.

ABBREVIATIONS

  1. TDDS: Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems.
  2. USP: United States Pharmacopeia

FUNDING:

This Review Article did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

All the data was available from public databases and there was no need for ethics approval and consent.

REFERENCES

    1. P. K. Ruby, S. M. Pathak, and D. Aggarwal, “Critical attributes of transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS)- A generic product development review,” Nov. 01, 2014, Informa Healthcare. doi: 10.3109/03639045.2013.879720.
    2. D. P. Patil et al., “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System INTRODUCTION,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijppr.humanjournals.comwww.ijppr.humanjournals.com
    3. G. M. Hussein, B. M. Elhaj, and H. Saad Ali, “A multifaceted review journal in the field of pharmacy Concepts, Current Status, Approaches in Transdermal Drug Delivery System Technologies,” Systematic Review Pharmacy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 411–418, 2021.
    4. A. Samad, Z. Ullah, M. I. Alam, M. Wais, and M. S. Shams, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Patent Reviews,” 2009.
    5. R. Patel, A. Patel, B. Prajapati, G. Shinde, and A. Dharamsi, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS: A MINI REVIEW.,” Int J Adv Res (Indore), vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 891–900, May 2018, doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/7109.
    6. “601-612 |Review INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 601 | P a g e”, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10833938.
    7. S. Malvey, J. V. Rao, and K. M. Arumugam, “Transdermal drug delivery system: A mini review,” ~ 181 ~ The Pharma Innovation Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 181–197, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
    8. Z. Lotfollahi, “The anatomy, physiology and function of all skin layers and the impact of ageing on the skin,” Mar. 01, 2024, Cambridge Media. doi: 10.33235/wpr.32.1.6-10.
    9. S. Bajpai, K. Butola, and V. Bisht, “Recent Advancement on TDDS (Transdermal Drug Delivery System),” Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 59–67, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.55544/jrasb.1.5.6.
    10. S. Ali, M. Shabbir, and N. Shahid, “The structure of skin and transdermal drug delivery system - A review,” Feb. 01, 2015, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00019.0.
    11. A. Z. Alkilani, M. T. C. McCrudden, and R. F. Donnelly, “Transdermal drug delivery: Innovative pharmaceutical developments based on disruption of the barrier properties of the stratum corneum,” Oct. 22, 2015, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7040438.
    12. M. Hussain, H. Sharma, G. K. Sharma, K. K. Chandrul, S. B. of Pharma, and th year, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System INTRODUCTION,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
    13. A. Mishra, “396 | Review,” Int. J. in Pharm. Sci, vol. 1, p. 391, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8363004.
    14. R Divyaparvathi, R. Manivannan, T. Praveenkumar, and K Sankar, “Overview of Transdermal Patches,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications, vol. 8, pp. 1390–1397, doi: 10.35629/7781-080113901397.
    15. S. Brito, M. Baek, and B. H. Bin, “Skin Structure, Physiology, and Pathology in Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery,” Nov. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16111403.
    16. Yogeishwar S and Gayathri H, “Skin Deep: Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Technology,” 2024, doi: 10.48047/AFJBS.6.Si3.2024.3260-3269.
    17. “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System.” [Online]. Available: www.ijsrm.humanjournals.com
    18. B. Ashwini, B. Durga, P. Ige, S. Dist Ahmednagar, and C. Author, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System-Focus on Innovative 2 Transder-mal Dosage Forms”, [Online]. Available: www.annexpublishers.com
    19. M. N. Pastore, Y. N. Kalia, M. Horstmann, and M. S. Roberts, “Transdermal patches: History, development and pharmacology,” Jan. 05, 2015, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1111/bph.13059.
    20. D. Ramadon, M. T. C. McCrudden, A. J. Courtenay, and R. F. Donnelly, “Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery systems: current trends and applications,” Drug Deliv Transl Res, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 758–791, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-00909-6.
    21. L. M. Mathews and A. Roy, “Management of pain using transdermal patches - A review,” Nov. 01, 2016, Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i6.13775.
    22. A. Soni, J. S. Dua, and D. N. Prasad, “Article Reviewing Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 176–180, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v12i1.5159.
    23. G. Kapoor, R. Mishra, and J. Sharma, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Recent Review,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
    24. R. Dubey and U. Pothuvan, “Transdermal patches: an emerging mode of drug delivery system in pulmonary arterial hypertension,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 4-S, pp. 176–186, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v11i4-s.4925.
    25. R. Sachan and M. Bajpai, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 748–765, [Online]. Available: www.ijrdpl.com
    26. D. Bhatt and M. Aqil, “A Review: Different Generation Approaches of Transdermal drug delivery System,” J. Chem. Pharm. Res, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 184–193, 2010.
    27. S. Sadab et al., “A Comprehensive Review: Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Tool For Novel Drug Delivery System,” Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 40–47, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.22270/ajdhs.v2i4.24.
    28. Disha A Deulkar, Jitendra A Kubde, Pooja R Hatwar, and Ravindrakumar L Bakal, “A review on transdermal drug delivery system,” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 347–361, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0052.
    29. M. R. Prausnitz and R. Langer, “Transdermal drug delivery,” Nov. 2008. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1504.
    30. Y. Mamta, N. Satish, B. Jitendra, B. Ruchi, and M. Yadav, “A review on: Transdermal patches for pain management,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.jmpas.com
    31. P. Rajalakshmi et al., “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Int. J Pharm Sci Rev Res, vol. 83, no. 2, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.47583/ijpsrr.2023.v83i02.008.
    32. S. Premjeet, A. Bilandi, K. Sahil, and M. Akanksha, “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM (PATCHES), APPLICATIONS IN PRESENT SCENARIO,” IJRPC, vol. 2011, no. 4, [Online]. Available: www.ijrpc.com
    33. “134-Present scenario”.
    34. Y. S. Chavan, D. M. Shinkar, S. S. Jadhav, P. L. Pingale, S. S. Boraste, and S. V. Amrutkar, “A Simple Glance at the Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Pharmacophore, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 72–80, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.51847/qirpxsstx5.
    35. M. Bhowmick and T. Sengodan, “Review Article MECHANISMS, KINETICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF TRANSDERMAL PERMEATION-AN UPDATED REVIEW,” vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 636–641, [Online]. Available: http//www.ijrdpl.com
    36. M. Shabbir et al., “Formulation Considerations And Factors Affecting Transdermal Drug Delivery System-A Review ‘Where improvisation meets innovation’ Formulation Considerations And Factors Affecting Transdermal Drug Delivery System-A Review,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.ijopils.com
    37. B. Kim et al., “Transdermal delivery systems in cosmetics,” Biomedical Dermatology, vol. 4, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41702-020-0058-7.
    38. K. Rajesh, N. Upamanyu, and V. Jain, “ADVANCEMENTS IN SKIN DELIVERY: A TRANSDERMAL SCIENCE,” Int J Pharm Sci Res, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 3060, 2020, doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(7).3060-68.
    39. A. Das and A. B. Ahmed, “Natural permeation enhancer for transdermal drug delivery system and permeation evaluation: A review,” 2017, Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i9.19389.
    40. C. Ghulaxe and R. Verma, “A review on transdermal drug delivery system,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
    41. Rajeswari S, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A NOVEL TOOL FOR IMPROVING BIOAVAILABILITY,” vol. 9, p. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.22159/ijs.2021v9i4.41211.
    42. S. P. Shinde, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.ijcrt.org
    43. N. M. Nikam, “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2021, doi: 10.51521/JPEM.2021.1107.
    44. Vishal Dnyaneshwar Kalatre, Mrs. Nitin R. Kale, and Dr Gajanan Sanap, “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS),” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, pp. 226–232, May 2024, doi: 10.48175/ijarsct-18137.
    45. G. Verma, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM, ADVANCE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION-A REVIEW,” Int J Pharm Sci Res, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 385–400, 2017, doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(2).385-00.
    46. N. Sharma, G. Agarwal, A. C. Rana, Z. Ali Bhat, D. Kumar, and A. Bhat, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Tool For Novel Drug Delivery System.” [Online]. Available: http://www.ijddr.in
    47. L. savithri S, G. R. B, S. S. K, D. G, S. Y, and R. P, “Review on Transdermal drug delivery system,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Analysis, pp. 236–240, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47957/ijpda.v9i4.482.
    48. G. Patel, K. Narkhede, A. Prajapati, and S. Narkhede, “A Comprehensive Review Article on Transdermal Patch,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 77–81, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.47760/ijpsm.2023.v08i03.006.
    49. F. Y. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Y. Huang, and C. M. Cheng, “Transdermal drug delivery systems for fighting common viral infectious diseases,” Drug Deliv Transl Res, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1498–1508, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01004-6.
    50. T. Adesh Manmohan, “IJCRT2112190 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org b801 FORMULATION AND EVALUATION ASPECTS OF TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2021, [Online]. Available: www.ijcrt.org
    51. D. Bhowmik and Kps. Kumar, “Recent Approaches in Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” THE PHARMA INNOVATION-JOURNAL, vol. 2, no. 7725, 2013, [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
    52. H. Tanwar, R. Sachdeva, and G. Jambheshwar, “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH HTML Full Text TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” Thomson Reuters, 2018.
    53. A. Mahdiyyah, N. Diyah, and E. Hendradi, “Transdermal Patches: A review of a new drug delivery system approach,” International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, no. 0, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.5455/ijmrcr.172-1641124566.
    54. S. P. Bhagwan, “Review Article on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 2024, [Online]. Available: www.ijsrem.com
    55. P. B. Shankar, “Patches: A Novel approach for development of topical drug delivery system.” [Online]. Available: www.japer.in
    56. S. Agrahari, A. Sharma, S. Kumar, A. Sharma, and M. K. Sagar, “Formulation and Development of Transdermal Patches of Piroxicam,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 119–128, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.22270/ajprd.v7i3.511.
    57. A. Cammarano, S. Dello Iacono, C. Meglio, and L. Nicolais, “Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: a Bibliometric and Patent Analysis,” Dec. 06, 2023. doi: 10.20944/preprints202312.0340.v1.
    58. T. Tanner and R. Marks, “Delivering drugs by the transdermal route: Review and comment,” Aug. 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00316.x.
    59. R. Kumar, R. Mishra, and M. Singh Saluja, “TDDS (Transdermal Drug Delivery System): A Updated Review,” 2023.
    60. N. Choudhary and A. P. Singh, “Transdermal drug delivery system: A review,” Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–9, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.18231/j.ijpp.2021.002.
    61. P. yadav, S. Patil, A. adhikari, and S. Bhandari, “A BRIEF REVIEW ON THE TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” JETIR, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.orgm440
    62. S. Kakar, R. Singh, and P. Rani, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY.”
    63. R. Shivaji Ghadge, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.questjournals.org
    64. “62”.
    65. D. S. Patel, M. V Patel, K. N. Patel, B. A. Patel, and P. A. Patel, “Transdermal Patches: A Complete Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System.”
    66. S. D. Deshmukh, K. D. Gangavane, S. T. Sevlani, and J. Pinjari, “A DETAIL REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION,” JETIR, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.orgd754
    67. A. R. Sahane, V. C. Bhagat, V. S. Kindre, and V. V Sayam, “Review on Polymers Used in Transdermal Drug Delivery System.”
    68. R. Jayaprakash, J. Hameed, and Anupriya, “An overview of transdermal delivery system,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 36–40, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i10.19909.
    69. D Prabhakar, J. Sreekanth, and K. N. Jayaveera, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY PATCHES: A REVIEW,” Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, vol. 2013, no. 3, p. 213, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://jddtonline.info
    70. L. John and L. John Guru Teg Bahadur, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System Corresponding author *,” vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 261–272, 2014, [Online]. Available: www.pharmahealthsciences.net
    71. “53”.
    72. N. Jawale, C. Bhangale, M. Chaudhari, and T. A. Deshmukh, “PHYSICAL APPROACH TO TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY: A REVIEW,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 7, no. 3, May 2017, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v7i3.1435.
    73. Y. Q. Yu, X. Yang, X. F. Wu, and Y. Bin Fan, “Enhancing Permeation of Drug Molecules Across the Skin via Delivery in Nanocarriers: Novel Strategies for Effective Transdermal Applications,” Mar. 29, 2021, Frontiers Media S.A. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.646554.
    74. V. Lohmann, F. Korner, J. Koch, V. Herian, L. Theilmann, and R. Bartenschlager, “Replication of subgenomic hepatitis virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line,” 2001. [Online]. Available: www.ijpsonline.com
    75. Dimpy Jaiswal and Dr. Pushpendra Jain., “Recent Updates and Advancement of Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol, pp. 634–642, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.32628/ijsrset23103176.
    76. K. Rekha Sudam and B. Ritesh Suresh, “International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research A Comprehensive Review on: Transdermal drug delivery systems,” International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 7, 2016, doi: 10.7439/ijbar.
    77. Prof. Shirish B. Nagansurkar, Dr. Sanjay k. Bais, and Mr. Pradip Daji Shembade, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, pp. 163–176, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.48175/ijarsct-7965.
    78. C. Ghulaxe, M. Karpillai, S. Pillai, P. Kushwah, and R. Mansare, “World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research www.wjpmr.com 63 REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.” [Online]. Available: www.wjpmr.com
    79. M. Rajashekar, “Design and Study of Transdermal Drug Delivery System in Humans,” J Drug Abuse, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 62, doi: 10.36648/2471-853X.7.10.62.
    80. D. Raj Sharma, V. Pandit, and M. Ashawat, “Review Article: Recent Advancement In Transdermal Drug Delivery System (Tdds).” [Online]. Available: http://journalppw.com
    81. N. Shinde, S. Manikpuriya, G. Sanap, and A. Professor, “REVIEW OF TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” Certified Journal ? Shinde et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 13, 2024, doi: 10.20959/wjpr20241-30818.
    82. H. Tanwar and R. Sachdeva Guru Jambheshwar, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” Int J Pharm Sci Res, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 2274, 2016, doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(6).2274-90.
    83. S. Gm et al., “REVIEW ON: RECENT TREND ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, vol. 2012, no. 1, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://jddtonline.info
    84. K. N. Durga, B. P., H. B., and P. K., “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, pp. 159–166, May 2022, doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2022.00027.
    85. V. V. Naik, C. B. Markonda, A. A. Rao, and M. Prasuli, “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Available online at www.ijpcbs.com FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF MATRIX TYPE TRANSDERMAL PATCHES OF ROSIGLITAZONE MALEATE,” IJPCBS, vol. 2016, no. 2, pp. 182–190, [Online]. Available: www.ijpcbs.com
    86. J. Ashok Kumar, N. Pullakandam, S. Lakshmana Prabu, and V. Gopal, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: AN OVERVIEW.” [Online]. Available: www.globalresearchonline.net
    87. Divya Dubey and Archana Yadav, “Water Quality Assessment of Gomti River in District Sultanpur, U.P.,” Int J Sci Res Sci Technol, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 05–12, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.32628/ijsrst.
    88. S. Lefnaoui, N. Moulai-Mostefa, M. M. Yahoum, and S. N. Gasmi, “Design of antihistaminic transdermal films based on alginate–chitosan polyelectrolyte complexes: characterization and permeation studies,” Drug Dev Ind Pharm, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 432–443, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/03639045.2017.1395461.
    89. A. Rana, V. Kaur, and S. Kaushal, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” Rana et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 7, p. 229, 2018, doi: 10.20959/wjpr201811-12360.
    90. P. Bose, A. Jana, and S. Chandra, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Review and Future,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://annalsofrscb.ro
    91. C. Author and P. D. Thakare, “|Review,” Int. J. of Pharm. Sci, vol. 2, pp. 1438–1452, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11318946.
    92. R. Kumar, J. Gupta, and H. R. Chauhan, “Transdermal patches: Design and current approaches to painless drug delivery.” [Online]. Available: www.ijariie.com
    93. M. A. Jadhav, M. Shubhangi Vidhate, M. Akshay More, M. Nikhil Bhujbal, and S. Kshirsagar, “Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy (SAJP) Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Novel Approches,” 2018, doi: 10.21276/sajp.2018.7.9.2.
    94. D. Abdul Mannan, F. Asher, A. Fatima, S. Habeeb, and Y. Fatima, “A Review Article on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2022.
    95. S. Jayaprakash, S. Ramkanth, P. Anitha, M. Alagusundaram, M. T. S Saleem, and M. C. Chetty, “DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MONOLITHIC DRUG-IN-ADHESIVE TRANSDERMAL PATCHES OF MELOXICAM,” 2010.
    96. S. S. Ganti, S. A. Bhattaccharjee, K. S. Murnane, B. E. Blough, and A. K. Banga, “Formulation and evaluation of 4-benzylpiperidine drug-in-adhesive matrix type transdermal patch,” Int J Pharm, vol. 550, no. 1–2, pp. 71–78, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.033.
    97. M. Hanumanaik, U. Patil, G. Kumar, K. Patel, I. Singh, and K. Jadatkar, “DESIGN, EVALUATION AND RECENT TRENDS IN TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” IJPSR, vol. 3, no. 8, p. 8, 2012, [Online]. Available: www.ijpsr.com
    98. S. Shikalgar, D. Wanode, and R. Nikhate, “A BRIEF REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijcrt.org
    99. “110-Evaluation”.
    100. “REVIEW: TRANSDERMAL PATCH,” Int J Biol Pharm Allied Sci, vol. 10, no. 12 (SPECIAL ISSUE), Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31032/ijbpas/2021/10.12.1010.
    101. D. Patel, S. A. Chaudhary, B. Parmar, and N. Bhura, “THE PHARMA INNOVATION Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Review,” 2012. [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
    102. E. Abd et al., “Skin models for the testing of transdermal drugs,” Oct. 19, 2016, Dove Medical Press Ltd. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S64788.
    103. Prakash Raj K, Rajakarthikeyan U, Saranraj L, Sivakumar L, R. Yuvhraj, and Buvaneshvaran K, “A small review on recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system,” Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 10–16, May 2024, doi: 10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.003.
    104. R. Parhi and A. Mandru, “Enhancement of skin permeability with thermal ablation techniques: concept to commercial products,” Jun. 01, 2021, Springer. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00823-3.
    105. R. S. Vaseem et al., “Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Focused Review of the Physical Methods of Permeation Enhancement,” Mar. 01, 2024, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.018.
    106. P. Laurn and M. Arean, “Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems for Systemic Disease Management,” Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Research Sciences and Sustainability (JAPRSS), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.17323/japrss.v1i1.12663.
    107. P. Z and H. C, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems,” Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Development, vol. 1, no. 6, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.15744/2348-9782.1.602.
    108. D. Bird and N. M. Ravindra, “Transdermal drug delivery and patches—An overview,” Med Devices Sens, vol. 3, no. 6, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1002/mds3.10069.
    109. A. O. A, S. K. U, and B. S. B, “Recent Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
    110. M. Tabade, P. Zendekar, S. Manikpuriya, G. Sanap, A. Professor, and L. Bhagirathi Yashwantrao, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.wjpmr.com
    111. R. Bathe and R. Kapoor, “International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research Transdermal drug delivery system: formulation, development and evaluation-An overview,” International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, vol. 6, no. 01, p. 6, 2015, doi: 10.7439/ijbar.
    112. D. Bhowmik and C. Bhattacharjee, “Recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287471991
    113. S. Chakrabarty, J. Bhattacharya, A. Chowdhury, P. Roy, and S. K. Jha, “NEEDLE FREE MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE THROUGH REVERSE IONTOPHORESIS,” Jul. 01, 2022, Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2022v14i4.44288.
    114. M. Paranjape, “Pain-free diabetic monitoring using transdermal patches,” SPIE Newsroom, 2008, doi: 10.1117/2.1200808.1247.
    115. Y. Zhang, J. Yu, A. R. Kahkoska, J. Wang, J. B. Buse, and Z. Gu, “Advances in transdermal insulin delivery,” Jan. 15, 2019, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.006.
    116. N. W. Kopper, J. Gudeman, and D. J. Thompson, “Transdermal hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: A review of metabolic effects and drug delivery technologies,” 2008.
    117. M. Š. Goldštajn et al., “Effects of transdermal versus oral hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause: a systematic review,” Jun. 01, 2023, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06647-5.
    118. J. S. Starkman and R. R. Dmochowski, “Management of Overactive Bladder With Transdermal Oxybutynin,” 2006.
    119. V. W. Nitti, “TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER Transdermal Therapy for Overactive Bladder: Present and Future,” 2003.
    120. R. R. Dmochowski, J. S. Starkman, and G. W. Davila, “513 Transdermal Treatment for Overactive Bladder Transdermal Drug Delivery Treatment for Overactive Bladder.”
    121. S. Rohini U et al., “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 77–86, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.22270/ajprd.v12i2.1365.
    122. K. D. Mayuri, P. D. Milind, M. S. Sonali, and G. A. Tushar, “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
    123. K Purushotham and K Anie Vijetha, “A review on transdermal drug delivery system,” GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 245–255, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.30574/gscbps.2023.22.2.0053.
    124. W. F. Wong, K. P. Ang, G. Sethi, and C. Y. Looi, “Recent Advancement of Medical Patch for Transdermal Drug Delivery,” Apr. 01, 2023, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040778.
    125. B. Bhuvana, S. Nagalakshmi, and S. Shanmuganathan, “A Novel Transdermal Drug Delivery System and Its Applications in Present Scenario,” JCPS, vol. 10, [Online]. Available: www.jchps.com
    126. Alejandro Zaffaroni Atherton, “BANDAGE FOR ADMINISTERING DRUGS,” Apr. 01, 1971 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3598122A/en?oq=US3598122A
    127. Ginter Cordes and Michael Wolff, “Transdermal drug patches,” May 26, 1987 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4668232A/en?oq=US-4668232-A
    128. Richard W. Baker, Frank Kochinke, and Carl Huang, “NOVELTRANSIDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH,” Jun. 13, 1989 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4839174A/en?oq=US4%2c839%2c174
    129. Arnold G. Benecke, Daniel J. Kinne, and Andrew J. Wnuk, “Storage-Stable Transdermal Patch,” Apr. 16, 1991 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5008110A/en?oq=US+5008110A
    130. William R. Pfister and Jeniffer M. Wilson, “Silicone pressure sensitive adhesive compositons for transdermal drug delivery devices and related medical devices,” Aug. 03, 1993 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5232702A/en?oq=US+5%2c232%2c702
    131. Sharad K. Govil, Edward M. Rudnic, and Dale G. Sterner, “Transdermal Nitroglycerin Patch with Penetration Enhancers,” Nov. 16, 1993 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5262165A/en?oq=US5%2c262%2c165
    132. A. System, R. D. Gokhale, and V. Hills, “Single layer transdermal drug administration system,” Mar. 01, 1994 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5290561A/en?oq=US5%2c290%2c561
    133. Judith P. Kitchell, Indu A. Muni, and Yvonne N. Boyer, “Controlled, sustained release delivery system for treating drug dependency,” Nov. 1996 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5486362A/en?oq=US5%2c486%2c362
    134. Jed E. Rose and Edward D. Levin, “Agonist-antagonist combination to reduce the use of nicotine and other drugs,” Dec. 30, 1997 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5703101A/en?oq=US+5%2c703%2c101
    135. Richard W. Baker, Giancarlo Santus, and Susan Vintilla-Friedman, “Method and therapeutic system for smoking cessation,” Feb. 24, 1994 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5721257A/en?oq=US5%2c721%2c257
    136. Jerry Rosenbaum, “Transdermal Delivery of Dehydroepiandrosterone,” Feb. 1999 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5869090A/en?oq=US5%2c869%2c090
    137. Scott Allison Burton and Shahnaz Tata, “TRANSDERMAL PATCH,” Sep. 07, 1999 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5948433A/en?oq=US5%2c948%2c433
    138. Daniel T. Green and Robert R. Henry, “Compositions and methods for the prevention and control of insulin-induced hypoglycemia,” Jan. 05, 2010 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7642232B2/en?oq=US+7%2c642%2c232+B2
    139. Jamal S. Yanaki, “Active electrode for transdermal medicament administration,” Jun. 12, 2012 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8197844B2/en?oq=US+8%2c197%2c844+B2
    140. Bernadette Messier, Zoran Novakovic, and Jeremiah Peter O’Leary, “Transdermal porator and patch system and method for using same,” Feb. 04, 2014 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8641689B2/en?oq=US+8%2c641%2c689+B2
    141. Robert M. Gale, Jay Audett, and Rama V. Padmanabhan, “Transdermal nicotine salt delivery system,” Jun. 16, 2005 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9056061B2/en?oq=US+9%2c056%2c061+B2
    142. Mir A. Imran, Talat Imran, and Mir Hashim, “System and method for biphasic transdermal iontophoretic delivery of therapeutic agents for the control of addictive cravings,” Feb. 11, 2020 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10556106B2/en?oq=US+10%2c556%2c106+B2
    143. Russell F. Ross, “Transdermal delivery of high viscosity bioactive agents,” Sep. 28, 2021 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11129975B2/en?oq=US+11%2c129%2c975+B2
    144. Audra Lynn Stinchcomb, Dana Carmel Hammell, and Stan Lee Banks, “Abuse deterrent opiod/opiod-antagonist transdermal patch,” Jan. 03, 2023 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2955247C/en?oq=CA2955247
    145. Eun Soo Lee, Amit K. Jain, and Parminder Singh, “Systems and methods for long term transdermal administration,” May 16, 2023 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11648214B2/en?oq=US+11648214+B2
    146. Russell Adam Baird, Brad L. Barnett, and Russell D. Beste, “Process for the continuous manufacture of a polyisobutylene based transdermal patch,” Feb. 2024 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11911522B2/en?oq=US+11911522+B2
    147. Gary J. Speier, “Pharmaceutical composition and method of manufacturing,” Mar. 26, 2024 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11938160B2/en?oq=US+11938160+B2
    148. R. R. Khandale, S. Tanaji, V. Chandrakant Kumbhar, A. U. Kumbhar, and D. Ramchandra Sule, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijnrd.org
    149. D. Krishnarajan, V. Varadharajan, N. Gobi, D. Gowtham, G. Yuva, and P. Vasudevan, “Original Review Article RECENT APPROACHES OF TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” Pharmacophore, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 227, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.pharmacophorejournal.com/
    150. N. Kumar Verma, P. Panda, J. N. Mishra, D. K. Vishwakarma, A. P. Singh, and G. Alam, “International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutics Advances and development in transdermal drug delivery system-A Review QR Code *Correspondence Info,” International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutics, 2017, doi: 10.7439/ijap.
    151. M. R. Prausnitz, S. Mitragotri, and R. Langer, “Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery,” 2004, Nature Publishing Group. doi: 10.1038/nrd1304.
    152. R. Kamel, “Transdermal Drug Delivery: Benefits and Challenges,” Journal of Applied Pharmacy, vol. 08, no. 01, 2016, doi: 10.4172/1920-4159.1000e103.
    153. S. A. Pawestri, A. K. Nugroho, E. Lukitaningsih, and P. Purwantiningsih, “Challenges and potentials of developing domperidone into the transdermal delivery,” Majalah Farmaseutik, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 357, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.22146/farmaseutik.v18i3.74154.
    154. H. Saravanan, “|Review INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 362 | P a g e,” Int. J. of Pharm. Sci, vol. 2, pp. 362–373, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10933536.
    155. D. Shukla, R. Kukkar, and V. Bahadur, “Advances and Challenges in Transdermal Patch Technology: A Comprehensive Evaluation.” [Online]. Available: http://ymerdigital.com
    156. T. Cheng et al., “Advance and Challenges in the Treatment of Skin Diseases with the Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Aug. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082165.
    157. L. W. Limenh, “Advances in the transdermal delivery of antiretroviral drugs,” Jan. 01, 2024, SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.1177/20503121231223600.
    158. K. Santosh, T. Lahu, and K. Abhishek, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Benefits and Challenges,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
    159. P. M. Patil, P. D. Chaudhari, J. K. Patel, K. A. Kedar, and P. P. Katolkar, “Recent trends in challenges and opportunities of Transdermal drug delivery system ‘Recent trends in challenges and opportunities of Transdermal drug delivery system.’” [Online]. Available: http://www.ijddr.in

Reference

  1. P. K. Ruby, S. M. Pathak, and D. Aggarwal, “Critical attributes of transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS)- A generic product development review,” Nov. 01, 2014, Informa Healthcare. doi: 10.3109/03639045.2013.879720.
  2. D. P. Patil et al., “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System INTRODUCTION,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijppr.humanjournals.comwww.ijppr.humanjournals.com
  3. G. M. Hussein, B. M. Elhaj, and H. Saad Ali, “A multifaceted review journal in the field of pharmacy Concepts, Current Status, Approaches in Transdermal Drug Delivery System Technologies,” Systematic Review Pharmacy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 411–418, 2021.
  4. A. Samad, Z. Ullah, M. I. Alam, M. Wais, and M. S. Shams, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Patent Reviews,” 2009.
  5. R. Patel, A. Patel, B. Prajapati, G. Shinde, and A. Dharamsi, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS: A MINI REVIEW.,” Int J Adv Res (Indore), vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 891–900, May 2018, doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/7109.
  6. “601-612 |Review INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 601 | P a g e”, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10833938.
  7. S. Malvey, J. V. Rao, and K. M. Arumugam, “Transdermal drug delivery system: A mini review,” ~ 181 ~ The Pharma Innovation Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 181–197, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
  8. Z. Lotfollahi, “The anatomy, physiology and function of all skin layers and the impact of ageing on the skin,” Mar. 01, 2024, Cambridge Media. doi: 10.33235/wpr.32.1.6-10.
  9. S. Bajpai, K. Butola, and V. Bisht, “Recent Advancement on TDDS (Transdermal Drug Delivery System),” Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 59–67, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.55544/jrasb.1.5.6.
  10. S. Ali, M. Shabbir, and N. Shahid, “The structure of skin and transdermal drug delivery system - A review,” Feb. 01, 2015, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00019.0.
  11. A. Z. Alkilani, M. T. C. McCrudden, and R. F. Donnelly, “Transdermal drug delivery: Innovative pharmaceutical developments based on disruption of the barrier properties of the stratum corneum,” Oct. 22, 2015, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7040438.
  12. M. Hussain, H. Sharma, G. K. Sharma, K. K. Chandrul, S. B. of Pharma, and th year, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System INTRODUCTION,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
  13. A. Mishra, “396 | Review,” Int. J. in Pharm. Sci, vol. 1, p. 391, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8363004.
  14. R Divyaparvathi, R. Manivannan, T. Praveenkumar, and K Sankar, “Overview of Transdermal Patches,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications, vol. 8, pp. 1390–1397, doi: 10.35629/7781-080113901397.
  15. S. Brito, M. Baek, and B. H. Bin, “Skin Structure, Physiology, and Pathology in Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery,” Nov. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16111403.
  16. Yogeishwar S and Gayathri H, “Skin Deep: Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Technology,” 2024, doi: 10.48047/AFJBS.6.Si3.2024.3260-3269.
  17. “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System.” [Online]. Available: www.ijsrm.humanjournals.com
  18. B. Ashwini, B. Durga, P. Ige, S. Dist Ahmednagar, and C. Author, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System-Focus on Innovative 2 Transder-mal Dosage Forms”, [Online]. Available: www.annexpublishers.com
  19. M. N. Pastore, Y. N. Kalia, M. Horstmann, and M. S. Roberts, “Transdermal patches: History, development and pharmacology,” Jan. 05, 2015, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1111/bph.13059.
  20. D. Ramadon, M. T. C. McCrudden, A. J. Courtenay, and R. F. Donnelly, “Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery systems: current trends and applications,” Drug Deliv Transl Res, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 758–791, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-00909-6.
  21. L. M. Mathews and A. Roy, “Management of pain using transdermal patches - A review,” Nov. 01, 2016, Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2016.v9i6.13775.
  22. A. Soni, J. S. Dua, and D. N. Prasad, “Article Reviewing Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 176–180, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v12i1.5159.
  23. G. Kapoor, R. Mishra, and J. Sharma, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Recent Review,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
  24. R. Dubey and U. Pothuvan, “Transdermal patches: an emerging mode of drug delivery system in pulmonary arterial hypertension,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 4-S, pp. 176–186, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v11i4-s.4925.
  25. R. Sachan and M. Bajpai, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 748–765, [Online]. Available: www.ijrdpl.com
  26. D. Bhatt and M. Aqil, “A Review: Different Generation Approaches of Transdermal drug delivery System,” J. Chem. Pharm. Res, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 184–193, 2010.
  27. S. Sadab et al., “A Comprehensive Review: Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Tool For Novel Drug Delivery System,” Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 40–47, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.22270/ajdhs.v2i4.24.
  28. Disha A Deulkar, Jitendra A Kubde, Pooja R Hatwar, and Ravindrakumar L Bakal, “A review on transdermal drug delivery system,” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 347–361, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0052.
  29. M. R. Prausnitz and R. Langer, “Transdermal drug delivery,” Nov. 2008. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1504.
  30. Y. Mamta, N. Satish, B. Jitendra, B. Ruchi, and M. Yadav, “A review on: Transdermal patches for pain management,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.jmpas.com
  31. P. Rajalakshmi et al., “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Int. J Pharm Sci Rev Res, vol. 83, no. 2, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.47583/ijpsrr.2023.v83i02.008.
  32. S. Premjeet, A. Bilandi, K. Sahil, and M. Akanksha, “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM (PATCHES), APPLICATIONS IN PRESENT SCENARIO,” IJRPC, vol. 2011, no. 4, [Online]. Available: www.ijrpc.com
  33. “134-Present scenario”.
  34. Y. S. Chavan, D. M. Shinkar, S. S. Jadhav, P. L. Pingale, S. S. Boraste, and S. V. Amrutkar, “A Simple Glance at the Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Pharmacophore, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 72–80, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.51847/qirpxsstx5.
  35. M. Bhowmick and T. Sengodan, “Review Article MECHANISMS, KINETICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF TRANSDERMAL PERMEATION-AN UPDATED REVIEW,” vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 636–641, [Online]. Available: http//www.ijrdpl.com
  36. M. Shabbir et al., “Formulation Considerations And Factors Affecting Transdermal Drug Delivery System-A Review ‘Where improvisation meets innovation’ Formulation Considerations And Factors Affecting Transdermal Drug Delivery System-A Review,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.ijopils.com
  37. B. Kim et al., “Transdermal delivery systems in cosmetics,” Biomedical Dermatology, vol. 4, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41702-020-0058-7.
  38. K. Rajesh, N. Upamanyu, and V. Jain, “ADVANCEMENTS IN SKIN DELIVERY: A TRANSDERMAL SCIENCE,” Int J Pharm Sci Res, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 3060, 2020, doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(7).3060-68.
  39. A. Das and A. B. Ahmed, “Natural permeation enhancer for transdermal drug delivery system and permeation evaluation: A review,” 2017, Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i9.19389.
  40. C. Ghulaxe and R. Verma, “A review on transdermal drug delivery system,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
  41. Rajeswari S, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A NOVEL TOOL FOR IMPROVING BIOAVAILABILITY,” vol. 9, p. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.22159/ijs.2021v9i4.41211.
  42. S. P. Shinde, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.ijcrt.org
  43. N. M. Nikam, “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2021, doi: 10.51521/JPEM.2021.1107.
  44. Vishal Dnyaneshwar Kalatre, Mrs. Nitin R. Kale, and Dr Gajanan Sanap, “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS),” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, pp. 226–232, May 2024, doi: 10.48175/ijarsct-18137.
  45. G. Verma, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM, ADVANCE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION-A REVIEW,” Int J Pharm Sci Res, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 385–400, 2017, doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(2).385-00.
  46. N. Sharma, G. Agarwal, A. C. Rana, Z. Ali Bhat, D. Kumar, and A. Bhat, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Tool For Novel Drug Delivery System.” [Online]. Available: http://www.ijddr.in
  47. L. savithri S, G. R. B, S. S. K, D. G, S. Y, and R. P, “Review on Transdermal drug delivery system,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Analysis, pp. 236–240, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47957/ijpda.v9i4.482.
  48. G. Patel, K. Narkhede, A. Prajapati, and S. Narkhede, “A Comprehensive Review Article on Transdermal Patch,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 77–81, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.47760/ijpsm.2023.v08i03.006.
  49. F. Y. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Y. Huang, and C. M. Cheng, “Transdermal drug delivery systems for fighting common viral infectious diseases,” Drug Deliv Transl Res, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1498–1508, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01004-6.
  50. T. Adesh Manmohan, “IJCRT2112190 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org b801 FORMULATION AND EVALUATION ASPECTS OF TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2021, [Online]. Available: www.ijcrt.org
  51. D. Bhowmik and Kps. Kumar, “Recent Approaches in Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” THE PHARMA INNOVATION-JOURNAL, vol. 2, no. 7725, 2013, [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
  52. H. Tanwar, R. Sachdeva, and G. Jambheshwar, “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH HTML Full Text TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” Thomson Reuters, 2018.
  53. A. Mahdiyyah, N. Diyah, and E. Hendradi, “Transdermal Patches: A review of a new drug delivery system approach,” International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports, no. 0, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.5455/ijmrcr.172-1641124566.
  54. S. P. Bhagwan, “Review Article on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 2024, [Online]. Available: www.ijsrem.com
  55. P. B. Shankar, “Patches: A Novel approach for development of topical drug delivery system.” [Online]. Available: www.japer.in
  56. S. Agrahari, A. Sharma, S. Kumar, A. Sharma, and M. K. Sagar, “Formulation and Development of Transdermal Patches of Piroxicam,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 119–128, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.22270/ajprd.v7i3.511.
  57. A. Cammarano, S. Dello Iacono, C. Meglio, and L. Nicolais, “Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: a Bibliometric and Patent Analysis,” Dec. 06, 2023. doi: 10.20944/preprints202312.0340.v1.
  58. T. Tanner and R. Marks, “Delivering drugs by the transdermal route: Review and comment,” Aug. 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00316.x.
  59. R. Kumar, R. Mishra, and M. Singh Saluja, “TDDS (Transdermal Drug Delivery System): A Updated Review,” 2023.
  60. N. Choudhary and A. P. Singh, “Transdermal drug delivery system: A review,” Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–9, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.18231/j.ijpp.2021.002.
  61. P. yadav, S. Patil, A. adhikari, and S. Bhandari, “A BRIEF REVIEW ON THE TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” JETIR, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.orgm440
  62. S. Kakar, R. Singh, and P. Rani, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY.”
  63. R. Shivaji Ghadge, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.questjournals.org
  64. “62”.
  65. D. S. Patel, M. V Patel, K. N. Patel, B. A. Patel, and P. A. Patel, “Transdermal Patches: A Complete Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System.”
  66. S. D. Deshmukh, K. D. Gangavane, S. T. Sevlani, and J. Pinjari, “A DETAIL REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION,” JETIR, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.orgd754
  67. A. R. Sahane, V. C. Bhagat, V. S. Kindre, and V. V Sayam, “Review on Polymers Used in Transdermal Drug Delivery System.”
  68. R. Jayaprakash, J. Hameed, and Anupriya, “An overview of transdermal delivery system,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 36–40, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i10.19909.
  69. D Prabhakar, J. Sreekanth, and K. N. Jayaveera, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY PATCHES: A REVIEW,” Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, vol. 2013, no. 3, p. 213, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://jddtonline.info
  70. L. John and L. John Guru Teg Bahadur, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System Corresponding author *,” vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 261–272, 2014, [Online]. Available: www.pharmahealthsciences.net
  71. “53”.
  72. N. Jawale, C. Bhangale, M. Chaudhari, and T. A. Deshmukh, “PHYSICAL APPROACH TO TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY: A REVIEW,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, vol. 7, no. 3, May 2017, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v7i3.1435.
  73. Y. Q. Yu, X. Yang, X. F. Wu, and Y. Bin Fan, “Enhancing Permeation of Drug Molecules Across the Skin via Delivery in Nanocarriers: Novel Strategies for Effective Transdermal Applications,” Mar. 29, 2021, Frontiers Media S.A. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.646554.
  74. V. Lohmann, F. Korner, J. Koch, V. Herian, L. Theilmann, and R. Bartenschlager, “Replication of subgenomic hepatitis virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line,” 2001. [Online]. Available: www.ijpsonline.com
  75. Dimpy Jaiswal and Dr. Pushpendra Jain., “Recent Updates and Advancement of Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol, pp. 634–642, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.32628/ijsrset23103176.
  76. K. Rekha Sudam and B. Ritesh Suresh, “International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research A Comprehensive Review on: Transdermal drug delivery systems,” International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 7, 2016, doi: 10.7439/ijbar.
  77. Prof. Shirish B. Nagansurkar, Dr. Sanjay k. Bais, and Mr. Pradip Daji Shembade, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, pp. 163–176, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.48175/ijarsct-7965.
  78. C. Ghulaxe, M. Karpillai, S. Pillai, P. Kushwah, and R. Mansare, “World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research www.wjpmr.com 63 REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM.” [Online]. Available: www.wjpmr.com
  79. M. Rajashekar, “Design and Study of Transdermal Drug Delivery System in Humans,” J Drug Abuse, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 62, doi: 10.36648/2471-853X.7.10.62.
  80. D. Raj Sharma, V. Pandit, and M. Ashawat, “Review Article: Recent Advancement In Transdermal Drug Delivery System (Tdds).” [Online]. Available: http://journalppw.com
  81. N. Shinde, S. Manikpuriya, G. Sanap, and A. Professor, “REVIEW OF TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” Certified Journal ? Shinde et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 13, 2024, doi: 10.20959/wjpr20241-30818.
  82. H. Tanwar and R. Sachdeva Guru Jambheshwar, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” Int J Pharm Sci Res, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 2274, 2016, doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(6).2274-90.
  83. S. Gm et al., “REVIEW ON: RECENT TREND ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, vol. 2012, no. 1, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://jddtonline.info
  84. K. N. Durga, B. P., H. B., and P. K., “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, pp. 159–166, May 2022, doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2022.00027.
  85. V. V. Naik, C. B. Markonda, A. A. Rao, and M. Prasuli, “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Available online at www.ijpcbs.com FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF MATRIX TYPE TRANSDERMAL PATCHES OF ROSIGLITAZONE MALEATE,” IJPCBS, vol. 2016, no. 2, pp. 182–190, [Online]. Available: www.ijpcbs.com
  86. J. Ashok Kumar, N. Pullakandam, S. Lakshmana Prabu, and V. Gopal, “TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: AN OVERVIEW.” [Online]. Available: www.globalresearchonline.net
  87. Divya Dubey and Archana Yadav, “Water Quality Assessment of Gomti River in District Sultanpur, U.P.,” Int J Sci Res Sci Technol, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 05–12, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.32628/ijsrst.
  88. S. Lefnaoui, N. Moulai-Mostefa, M. M. Yahoum, and S. N. Gasmi, “Design of antihistaminic transdermal films based on alginate–chitosan polyelectrolyte complexes: characterization and permeation studies,” Drug Dev Ind Pharm, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 432–443, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/03639045.2017.1395461.
  89. A. Rana, V. Kaur, and S. Kaushal, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” Rana et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 7, p. 229, 2018, doi: 10.20959/wjpr201811-12360.
  90. P. Bose, A. Jana, and S. Chandra, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Review and Future,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://annalsofrscb.ro
  91. C. Author and P. D. Thakare, “|Review,” Int. J. of Pharm. Sci, vol. 2, pp. 1438–1452, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11318946.
  92. R. Kumar, J. Gupta, and H. R. Chauhan, “Transdermal patches: Design and current approaches to painless drug delivery.” [Online]. Available: www.ijariie.com
  93. M. A. Jadhav, M. Shubhangi Vidhate, M. Akshay More, M. Nikhil Bhujbal, and S. Kshirsagar, “Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy (SAJP) Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Novel Approches,” 2018, doi: 10.21276/sajp.2018.7.9.2.
  94. D. Abdul Mannan, F. Asher, A. Fatima, S. Habeeb, and Y. Fatima, “A Review Article on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2022.
  95. S. Jayaprakash, S. Ramkanth, P. Anitha, M. Alagusundaram, M. T. S Saleem, and M. C. Chetty, “DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MONOLITHIC DRUG-IN-ADHESIVE TRANSDERMAL PATCHES OF MELOXICAM,” 2010.
  96. S. S. Ganti, S. A. Bhattaccharjee, K. S. Murnane, B. E. Blough, and A. K. Banga, “Formulation and evaluation of 4-benzylpiperidine drug-in-adhesive matrix type transdermal patch,” Int J Pharm, vol. 550, no. 1–2, pp. 71–78, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.033.
  97. M. Hanumanaik, U. Patil, G. Kumar, K. Patel, I. Singh, and K. Jadatkar, “DESIGN, EVALUATION AND RECENT TRENDS IN TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” IJPSR, vol. 3, no. 8, p. 8, 2012, [Online]. Available: www.ijpsr.com
  98. S. Shikalgar, D. Wanode, and R. Nikhate, “A BRIEF REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijcrt.org
  99. “110-Evaluation”.
  100. “REVIEW: TRANSDERMAL PATCH,” Int J Biol Pharm Allied Sci, vol. 10, no. 12 (SPECIAL ISSUE), Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31032/ijbpas/2021/10.12.1010.
  101. D. Patel, S. A. Chaudhary, B. Parmar, and N. Bhura, “THE PHARMA INNOVATION Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Review,” 2012. [Online]. Available: www.thepharmajournal.com
  102. E. Abd et al., “Skin models for the testing of transdermal drugs,” Oct. 19, 2016, Dove Medical Press Ltd. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S64788.
  103. Prakash Raj K, Rajakarthikeyan U, Saranraj L, Sivakumar L, R. Yuvhraj, and Buvaneshvaran K, “A small review on recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system,” Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 10–16, May 2024, doi: 10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.003.
  104. R. Parhi and A. Mandru, “Enhancement of skin permeability with thermal ablation techniques: concept to commercial products,” Jun. 01, 2021, Springer. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00823-3.
  105. R. S. Vaseem et al., “Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Focused Review of the Physical Methods of Permeation Enhancement,” Mar. 01, 2024, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.018.
  106. P. Laurn and M. Arean, “Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems for Systemic Disease Management,” Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Research Sciences and Sustainability (JAPRSS), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.17323/japrss.v1i1.12663.
  107. P. Z and H. C, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems,” Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Development, vol. 1, no. 6, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.15744/2348-9782.1.602.
  108. D. Bird and N. M. Ravindra, “Transdermal drug delivery and patches—An overview,” Med Devices Sens, vol. 3, no. 6, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1002/mds3.10069.
  109. A. O. A, S. K. U, and B. S. B, “Recent Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2022. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
  110. M. Tabade, P. Zendekar, S. Manikpuriya, G. Sanap, A. Professor, and L. Bhagirathi Yashwantrao, “A REVIEW ON TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.wjpmr.com
  111. R. Bathe and R. Kapoor, “International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research Transdermal drug delivery system: formulation, development and evaluation-An overview,” International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, vol. 6, no. 01, p. 6, 2015, doi: 10.7439/ijbar.
  112. D. Bhowmik and C. Bhattacharjee, “Recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287471991
  113. S. Chakrabarty, J. Bhattacharya, A. Chowdhury, P. Roy, and S. K. Jha, “NEEDLE FREE MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE THROUGH REVERSE IONTOPHORESIS,” Jul. 01, 2022, Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2022v14i4.44288.
  114. M. Paranjape, “Pain-free diabetic monitoring using transdermal patches,” SPIE Newsroom, 2008, doi: 10.1117/2.1200808.1247.
  115. Y. Zhang, J. Yu, A. R. Kahkoska, J. Wang, J. B. Buse, and Z. Gu, “Advances in transdermal insulin delivery,” Jan. 15, 2019, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.006.
  116. N. W. Kopper, J. Gudeman, and D. J. Thompson, “Transdermal hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: A review of metabolic effects and drug delivery technologies,” 2008.
  117. M. Š. Goldštajn et al., “Effects of transdermal versus oral hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause: a systematic review,” Jun. 01, 2023, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06647-5.
  118. J. S. Starkman and R. R. Dmochowski, “Management of Overactive Bladder With Transdermal Oxybutynin,” 2006.
  119. V. W. Nitti, “TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER Transdermal Therapy for Overactive Bladder: Present and Future,” 2003.
  120. R. R. Dmochowski, J. S. Starkman, and G. W. Davila, “513 Transdermal Treatment for Overactive Bladder Transdermal Drug Delivery Treatment for Overactive Bladder.”
  121. S. Rohini U et al., “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 77–86, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.22270/ajprd.v12i2.1365.
  122. K. D. Mayuri, P. D. Milind, M. S. Sonali, and G. A. Tushar, “A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
  123. K Purushotham and K Anie Vijetha, “A review on transdermal drug delivery system,” GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 245–255, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.30574/gscbps.2023.22.2.0053.
  124. W. F. Wong, K. P. Ang, G. Sethi, and C. Y. Looi, “Recent Advancement of Medical Patch for Transdermal Drug Delivery,” Apr. 01, 2023, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040778.
  125. B. Bhuvana, S. Nagalakshmi, and S. Shanmuganathan, “A Novel Transdermal Drug Delivery System and Its Applications in Present Scenario,” JCPS, vol. 10, [Online]. Available: www.jchps.com
  126. Alejandro Zaffaroni Atherton, “BANDAGE FOR ADMINISTERING DRUGS,” Apr. 01, 1971 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3598122A/en?oq=US3598122A
  127. Ginter Cordes and Michael Wolff, “Transdermal drug patches,” May 26, 1987 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4668232A/en?oq=US-4668232-A
  128. Richard W. Baker, Frank Kochinke, and Carl Huang, “NOVELTRANSIDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH,” Jun. 13, 1989 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4839174A/en?oq=US4%2c839%2c174
  129. Arnold G. Benecke, Daniel J. Kinne, and Andrew J. Wnuk, “Storage-Stable Transdermal Patch,” Apr. 16, 1991 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5008110A/en?oq=US+5008110A
  130. William R. Pfister and Jeniffer M. Wilson, “Silicone pressure sensitive adhesive compositons for transdermal drug delivery devices and related medical devices,” Aug. 03, 1993 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5232702A/en?oq=US+5%2c232%2c702
  131. Sharad K. Govil, Edward M. Rudnic, and Dale G. Sterner, “Transdermal Nitroglycerin Patch with Penetration Enhancers,” Nov. 16, 1993 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5262165A/en?oq=US5%2c262%2c165
  132. A. System, R. D. Gokhale, and V. Hills, “Single layer transdermal drug administration system,” Mar. 01, 1994 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5290561A/en?oq=US5%2c290%2c561
  133. Judith P. Kitchell, Indu A. Muni, and Yvonne N. Boyer, “Controlled, sustained release delivery system for treating drug dependency,” Nov. 1996 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5486362A/en?oq=US5%2c486%2c362
  134. Jed E. Rose and Edward D. Levin, “Agonist-antagonist combination to reduce the use of nicotine and other drugs,” Dec. 30, 1997 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5703101A/en?oq=US+5%2c703%2c101
  135. Richard W. Baker, Giancarlo Santus, and Susan Vintilla-Friedman, “Method and therapeutic system for smoking cessation,” Feb. 24, 1994 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5721257A/en?oq=US5%2c721%2c257
  136. Jerry Rosenbaum, “Transdermal Delivery of Dehydroepiandrosterone,” Feb. 1999 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5869090A/en?oq=US5%2c869%2c090
  137. Scott Allison Burton and Shahnaz Tata, “TRANSDERMAL PATCH,” Sep. 07, 1999 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5948433A/en?oq=US5%2c948%2c433
  138. Daniel T. Green and Robert R. Henry, “Compositions and methods for the prevention and control of insulin-induced hypoglycemia,” Jan. 05, 2010 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7642232B2/en?oq=US+7%2c642%2c232+B2
  139. Jamal S. Yanaki, “Active electrode for transdermal medicament administration,” Jun. 12, 2012 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8197844B2/en?oq=US+8%2c197%2c844+B2
  140. Bernadette Messier, Zoran Novakovic, and Jeremiah Peter O’Leary, “Transdermal porator and patch system and method for using same,” Feb. 04, 2014 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8641689B2/en?oq=US+8%2c641%2c689+B2
  141. Robert M. Gale, Jay Audett, and Rama V. Padmanabhan, “Transdermal nicotine salt delivery system,” Jun. 16, 2005 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9056061B2/en?oq=US+9%2c056%2c061+B2
  142. Mir A. Imran, Talat Imran, and Mir Hashim, “System and method for biphasic transdermal iontophoretic delivery of therapeutic agents for the control of addictive cravings,” Feb. 11, 2020 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10556106B2/en?oq=US+10%2c556%2c106+B2
  143. Russell F. Ross, “Transdermal delivery of high viscosity bioactive agents,” Sep. 28, 2021 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11129975B2/en?oq=US+11%2c129%2c975+B2
  144. Audra Lynn Stinchcomb, Dana Carmel Hammell, and Stan Lee Banks, “Abuse deterrent opiod/opiod-antagonist transdermal patch,” Jan. 03, 2023 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2955247C/en?oq=CA2955247
  145. Eun Soo Lee, Amit K. Jain, and Parminder Singh, “Systems and methods for long term transdermal administration,” May 16, 2023 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11648214B2/en?oq=US+11648214+B2
  146. Russell Adam Baird, Brad L. Barnett, and Russell D. Beste, “Process for the continuous manufacture of a polyisobutylene based transdermal patch,” Feb. 2024 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11911522B2/en?oq=US+11911522+B2
  147. Gary J. Speier, “Pharmaceutical composition and method of manufacturing,” Mar. 26, 2024 Accessed: Dec. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11938160B2/en?oq=US+11938160+B2
  148. R. R. Khandale, S. Tanaji, V. Chandrakant Kumbhar, A. U. Kumbhar, and D. Ramchandra Sule, “Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijnrd.org
  149. D. Krishnarajan, V. Varadharajan, N. Gobi, D. Gowtham, G. Yuva, and P. Vasudevan, “Original Review Article RECENT APPROACHES OF TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW,” Pharmacophore, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 227, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.pharmacophorejournal.com/
  150. N. Kumar Verma, P. Panda, J. N. Mishra, D. K. Vishwakarma, A. P. Singh, and G. Alam, “International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutics Advances and development in transdermal drug delivery system-A Review QR Code *Correspondence Info,” International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutics, 2017, doi: 10.7439/ijap.
  151. M. R. Prausnitz, S. Mitragotri, and R. Langer, “Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery,” 2004, Nature Publishing Group. doi: 10.1038/nrd1304.
  152. R. Kamel, “Transdermal Drug Delivery: Benefits and Challenges,” Journal of Applied Pharmacy, vol. 08, no. 01, 2016, doi: 10.4172/1920-4159.1000e103.
  153. S. A. Pawestri, A. K. Nugroho, E. Lukitaningsih, and P. Purwantiningsih, “Challenges and potentials of developing domperidone into the transdermal delivery,” Majalah Farmaseutik, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 357, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.22146/farmaseutik.v18i3.74154.
  154. H. Saravanan, “|Review INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 362 | P a g e,” Int. J. of Pharm. Sci, vol. 2, pp. 362–373, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10933536.
  155. D. Shukla, R. Kukkar, and V. Bahadur, “Advances and Challenges in Transdermal Patch Technology: A Comprehensive Evaluation.” [Online]. Available: http://ymerdigital.com
  156. T. Cheng et al., “Advance and Challenges in the Treatment of Skin Diseases with the Transdermal Drug Delivery System,” Aug. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082165.
  157. L. W. Limenh, “Advances in the transdermal delivery of antiretroviral drugs,” Jan. 01, 2024, SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.1177/20503121231223600.
  158. K. Santosh, T. Lahu, and K. Abhishek, “Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Benefits and Challenges,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijrpr.com
  159. P. M. Patil, P. D. Chaudhari, J. K. Patel, K. A. Kedar, and P. P. Katolkar, “Recent trends in challenges and opportunities of Transdermal drug delivery system ‘Recent trends in challenges and opportunities of Transdermal drug delivery system.’” [Online]. Available: http://www.ijddr.in

Photo
Rohan Mane
Corresponding author

Department of Chemical Technology, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India 431004

Photo
Rukayya Shaikh
Co-author

Department of Chemical Technology, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India 431004

Photo
Priyanka Paulzagade
Co-author

Department of Chemical Technology, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India 431004

Rohan Mane, Rukayya Shaikh, Priyanka Paulzagade, A Review on Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Transdermal Patches, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2026, Vol 4, Issue 1, 1401-1432. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18245538

More related articles
Review of Tregady 2025 Cough Syrup: Safety, Effect...
Dipendu sahu, Shraddha patel, Deepak Maurya, Sunil mistry , Shivi...
Diagnostic Yield of Extended Cardiac Monitoring in...
Priyanka Prajapati, Neelesh, Bhanu Pratap, Rajkeerti Niwasan, ...
A Review on Herbal Antistress Roll-on Formulations...
Samiksha Shinde, Dattatray Parihar, Sakshi Ghodke, ...
Formulation, Development and Evaluation of In-Situ Gel of Anti-Inflammatory Drug...
Majhar Hussan, Ran Vijay Singh, Dr. Sanjay Kumar Kushwaha, ...
Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Medicinal Plants: A Review of Antim...
Harshika Bawankar, Priyanka Rathod, Sumbul Fatma Khan, Dr. V. S. Babu Agala, ...
Related Articles
A Comprehensive Review of Herbal Therapeutics in Cervical Cancer: Bioactive Plan...
Dr. Pravin Kumar, Sakshi, Dr. Vinay Pandit, Dr. M. S. Ashwat, Dr. Mayank Sharma, Dr. Swati Rana, Pra...
Antimalarial Activity of Indole Derivatives: A Comprehensive Review...
Lavkush Kumar Vishwakarma, Dinesh Thakur, Arun Pratap Singh, Ramkrishna Mishra, ...
Review of Tregady 2025 Cough Syrup: Safety, Effectiveness, and Important Takeawa...
Dipendu sahu, Shraddha patel, Deepak Maurya, Sunil mistry , Shivi singh , Abhay singh , Shivani Maur...
More related articles
Review of Tregady 2025 Cough Syrup: Safety, Effectiveness, and Important Takeawa...
Dipendu sahu, Shraddha patel, Deepak Maurya, Sunil mistry , Shivi singh , Abhay singh , Shivani Maur...
Diagnostic Yield of Extended Cardiac Monitoring in Transient Unexplained Vertigo...
Priyanka Prajapati, Neelesh, Bhanu Pratap, Rajkeerti Niwasan, ...
Review of Tregady 2025 Cough Syrup: Safety, Effectiveness, and Important Takeawa...
Dipendu sahu, Shraddha patel, Deepak Maurya, Sunil mistry , Shivi singh , Abhay singh , Shivani Maur...
Diagnostic Yield of Extended Cardiac Monitoring in Transient Unexplained Vertigo...
Priyanka Prajapati, Neelesh, Bhanu Pratap, Rajkeerti Niwasan, ...