View Article

Abstract

Targeted cancer therapy using tumor-specific nanoparticles represents a groundbreaking approach in modern oncology. By exploiting the unique characteristics of the tumor microenvironment and leveraging advanced nanotechnology, these nanosystems enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing off-target toxicity. Tumor-targeting nanoparticles are designed to improve the solubility, stability, and bioavailability of anticancer drugs. They achieve selective tumor accumulation via passive targeting, driven by the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, and active targeting through functionalized ligands like antibodies, peptides, or aptamers.Recent advancements include the development of stimuli-responsive nanoparticles that release their payload in response to tumor-specific conditions such as acidic pH, hypoxia, or enzymatic activity. These versatile platforms, encompassing liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic nanostructures, and hybrid systems, also facilitate multimodal applications like theranostics, combining therapy with imaging.Despite significant progress, challenges such as immune clearance, stability, and scalable manufacturing persist. This abstract highlights the potential of tumor-targeting nanoparticles in transforming cancer therapy, offering a paradigm shift towards precision medicine. By integrating nanotechnology with molecular oncology, these innovations hold the promise of revolutionizing cancer treatment, delivering safer and more effective solutions tailored to individual patients.

Keywords

Targeted cancer therapy, Nanotechnology in oncology, Active targeting, Drug delivery systems, Nanocarriers.

Introduction

Cancer denotes a group of diseases determined by the malignant form of abnormal tissue growth (neoplasm), resulting in cells without a normal morphology and/or function. (1) Cancer is a broad term for a group of diseases marked by uncontrolled and random cell division and invasiveness. Significant efforts have been made over the years to identify various cancer risk factors. In some cases, the causes of cancer have been significantly linked to specific environmental factors, such as radiation and pollution. Additionally, an unhealthy lifestyle characterized by a poor diet, tobacco use, stress, and lack of exercise greatly influences the risk of developing cancer. (2)A report from the World Health Organization (WHO) identifies cancer as the second leading cause of death globally, with more than 18 million cases and nearly 10 million deaths attributed to cancer in 2018. Given the swift rate of industrialization, cancer mortality rates are expected to nearly double by 2040. (3) Cancer is a major public health issue worldwide and ranks as the second leading cause of death. The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 1.9 million new cases by the end of 2021. (4) The standard treatment methods for cancer consist of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and hormone therapy. (5) While chemotherapy and radiation therapy have the capacity for cytostasis and cytotoxicity. (6) Neoplastic tissues can be categorized into three subcompartments: vascular, interstitial, and cellular. (7)

Novel Tumor Targeting Nanopaerticles:

Tumors are intricate tissues made up of neoplastic cells, and in the case of carcinomas, they include stromal cell compartments that contain various mesenchymal cells, particularly fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes, and different immune-related inflammatory cells. (8) The rapid expansion of tumors results in uneven vascularization, inconsistent blood flow, and elevated interstitial fluid pressure, which hinders both convection and diffusion. (9)

Types of Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems.

Nanoparticles can be made from various materials, including polymers, metals, and ceramics. Depending on their manufacturing techniques and the materials employed, these particles can take on a wide range of shapes and sizes, each with unique properties. Numerous types of nanoparticles are currently in different stages of development as drug delivery systems, such as liposomes and other lipid-based carriers (including lipid emulsions and lipid-drug complexes), polymer-drug conjugates, polymer microspheres, micelles, and various ligand-targeted products like immunoconjugates. (10)

Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Tumor Imaging

Tumor imaging is essential in clinical oncology, as radiological assessments can identify solid tumors, assess recurrence, and track therapeutic responses. Traditional imaging techniques like CT and MRI primarily focus on the morphological characteristics of tumors, tissues, and organs, detailing aspects such as anatomical location, extent, and size at various levels of spatial resolution and contrast. Despite ongoing advancements in spatial resolution with newer imaging technologies, methods that utilize nontargeted contrast agents like CT and MRI have limitations in sensitivity and in providing specific functional information about the disease. This shortcoming is increasingly recognized as a barrier to earlier diagnosis and effective monitoring of treatment responses. (11)

Nanoparticles:

Nanoparticles (NPs) are defined as particles that have at least one dimension smaller than 100 nm and exhibit unique properties that are typically absent in bulk materials of the same substance. Based on their overall shape, nanoparticles can be categorized as 0D, 1D, 2D, or 3D (12) Nanoparticles are generally defined as submicronic (< 1>

Synthesis of NPs

Nanoparticles (NPs) come in various shapes, sizes, and structures, achieved through a variety of synthesis methods. These methods can be broadly divided into two main categories:

  1. Bottom-up approach
  2. Top-down approach

Each of these approaches can be further subdivided into different subclasses depending on the reaction conditions and operational techniques used.

       
            Methods of synthesis of nanoparticles.png
       

Figure. 1 Methods of synthesis of nanoparticles

Top-Down Approach

Also referred to as the destructive method, this approach involves breaking down bulk materials to create nanoparticles (NPs). A larger molecule is decomposed into smaller units that are then transformed into NPs. Techniques used in this method include mechanical milling, nanolithography, chemical etching, laser ablation, sputtering, electro-explosion, and thermal decomposition.

Bottom-Up Approach

This method focuses on constructing materials from atoms to clusters to nanoparticles (NPs), essentially building them from simpler substances, which is why it is referred to as the constructive method. Common techniques used in this approach include spinning, sol-gel synthesis, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), plasma or flame spraying synthesis, laser pyrolysis, and biosynthesis.s

Types of Nanoparticles        

Nanoparticles are classified based on their composition, structure, and properties, with major types including organic nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles, and hybrid nanoparticles. These types exhibit distinct characteristics, making them suitable for various applications in drug delivery, diagnostics, and therapeutic interventions.

       
            Various Types of Nanoparticles (15).png
       

Figure. 2 Various Types of Nanoparticles (15)

  1. Organic NPs:

Organic nanoparticles (NPs) have been extensively researched for decades and encompass a variety of materials. The types of organic NPs that have been studied include liposome NPs, polymer NPs, and dendrimers. (16)

1.Liposomes:

Liposomes were the first nanoscale drug approved in 1965. (17) Liposomes are among the most extensively studied structures for creating effective drug carriers. Their unique design, featuring an aqueous core surrounded by a phospholipid bilayer, enables them to deliver both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. Additionally, liposomes possess several advantageous properties, such as biocompatibility, efficient drug encapsulation, size control, and ease of functionalization. However, they are known to have a short circulation half-life, which can be improved through PEGylation. Their capacity for surface modification also allows for the development of multifunctional, liposome-based nanoparticles with enhanced targeting capabilities for tumor sites.

       
            Schematic representation of a multifunctional liposome-based nanoparticle.(18).png
       

Figure. 3 Schematic representation of a multifunctional liposome-based nanoparticle.(18)

Polymeric Based Nanoparticals:

Polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) are colloidal particles that are submicron in size. An anticancer agent of interest can be adsorbed, encapsulated, or conjugated either inside or on the surface of the PNPs. These drug-loaded PNPs form a targeted delivery system designed for the sustained release of anticancer therapies at specific sites. The polymer shell safeguards the drug from degradation by enzymes in the body. (19)The release of an anticancer agent from the PNPs is governed by diffusion, hydrolysis, enzymatic degradation, or a combination of these processes. (20)

       
            A schematic representation of structure of polymeric nanoparticle based targeted drug delivery system. (21).png
       

Figure. 4 A schematic representation of structure of polymeric nanoparticle based targeted drug delivery system. (21)

Polymeric micelles are a type of polymeric nanoparticle that feature a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic shell, formed through the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers in an aqueous solution. The hydrophobic core serves as a solubilization reservoir for poorly water-soluble or hydrophobic agents, enhancing their bioavailability. The hydrophilic shell provides two key benefits: it prolongs circulation time in the bloodstream and improves stability. Tumor-specific ligands can be incorporated into polymeric micelles to boost their accumulation at tumor sites. Consequently, polymeric micelles can play a crucial role in delivering hydrophobic therapeutic agents for cancer treatment. An example includes a polymeric micelle made from PLGA-PEG-retinoic acid (RA) designed for the targeted delivery of irinotecan to HT-29 human colorectal and HepG2 cells. (22)

3.Dendrimers

Dendrimers are a distinctive class of highly branched polymeric macromolecules with multiple arms radiating from a central core, creating an almost perfect three-dimensional geometric structure. They can be synthesized using two main strategies:

  1. divergent methods                                          
  2. convergent methods

Divergent methods, introduced by Tomalia in the 1980s, involve the synthesis of three-dimensional polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers by growing branches that extend radially from a core to the outer edges. These PAMAM dendrimers feature tertiary amines and amide linkages, which enable the binding of various targeting and guest molecules. In contrast, convergent methods begin by synthesizing the dendrimer surfaces by gradually linking together surface unit monomers. Once the surface components reach a sufficient size, several are connected to an appropriate core to form a complete dendrimer. This convergent approach is used to synthesize polypropylene imine (PPI) and polyaryl ether dendrimers. (23) The synthesis of dendrimers begins by reacting an ammonia core with acrylic acid, leading to the formation of a "tri-acid" molecule. This molecule then reacts with ethylenediamine to produce a "tri-amine," which serves as a growth intermediate. This intermediate subsequently reacts with acrylic acid to form a hexa-acid, which in turn produces a "hexa-amine" (Generation 1) product, and this process continues for subsequent generations. Typically, dendrimers range in size from 1 to 10 nm, although they can sometimes reach up to 15 nm. (24)

       
            schematic structural illustration of dendrimer and a dendron. (25).png
       

Figure.5 schematic structural illustration of dendrimer and a dendron. (25)

  1. Hybrid Nanoparticles:

 Lipid –polymer hybrid nanoaprticles:

Lipid-based polymeric nanoparticles (LPHNPs) are highly regarded carrier systems for cancer drug therapy. The assembly of LPHNPs consists of three main components:

  1. A polymer core that contains the drug;
  2. A lipid monolayer surrounding the polymeric core, which minimizes drug release while protecting the core from water transport;
  3.  A lipid PEG layer where specific targeting moieties can be attached.

The polymeric core provides excellent structural integrity, storage stability, and controlled release properties, while the lipid and lipid-PEG layers enhance biocompatibility and bioavailability. Overall, LPHNPs are effective, convenient, and reliable carriers for drug delivery.

       
            schematic representation of multifunction LPHNPs comprising structural components and various possible functionalities. (26).png
       

Figure.6 schematic representation of multifunction LPHNPs comprising structural components and various possible functionalities. (26)

Types Of Lphnp.  

LPHNPs can be categorized based on their architecture, which integrates lipid and polymeric structures in the core and shell, respectively. (27)

The various types of LPHNPs, along with their structural arrangements, are as follows:

A) polymer core lipid shell.

B) core shell-type hollow lipid PLHNPs.

C) Monolithic PLHNPs

D) polymer- caged liposome.

E) Erythrocyte membrane coated PLHNPs.

       
            Different types of polymer- lipid hybrid nanoparticles and their structural advantages. (28).png
       

Figure.7 Different types of polymer- lipid hybrid nanoparticles and their structural advantages. (28)

Several methods have been developed for synthesizing LPHNPs, which can be broadly categorized into two main strategies:

 (1) one-step methods.                         

 (2) Two-step methods.

1. One-Step Methods

One-step methods primarily utilize the nanoprecipitation technique or emulsification-solvent evaporation techniques. However, nanoprecipitation offers significant advantages over emulsification-solvent evaporation, including its simplicity and the ability to produce nanoparticles with a narrow size distribution.

2.Two-Step Methods

The initial approaches for synthesizing LPHNPs relied on a two-step method, where polymeric nanoparticles are combined with pre-formed liposomes, allowing electrostatic forces to facilitate the attachment of the lipid shell to the polymer core. The polymeric core can be created using techniques such as nanoprecipitation, emulsification–solvent evaporation, or high-pressure homogenization.

       
            Schematic representation of the one-step(A) and two- step(B) methods used for the preparation of LPHNPs.) (29).png
       

Figure. 8 Schematic representation of the one-step(A) and two- step(B) methods used for the preparation of LPHNPs.) (29)

Cell Membrane Coated Nanoparticles:

Cell Membrane:

Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles (CMCNs) have been utilized in cancer immunotherapy. They can be employed to deliver immunotherapy drugs and immunomodulators to tumors or directly enhance the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy through their inherent properties.

Preparation of CMCNs:

The preparation of cell membrane-coated nanoparticles (CMCNs) involves three main steps:

  1. Isolation and preparation of cell membrane-derived vesicles (CMVs),
  2. Synthesis of the nanoparticle cores, and

Fusion of the CMVs  with the nanoparticle cores.

       
            schematic representation of source and types of CMCNs. (30).png
       

Figure. 9 schematic representation of source and types of CMCNs. (30)

  1. Red Blood Cells

Red blood cells (RBCs) are the most numerous cells in the bloodstream, containing haemoglobin, which serves as the primary medium for transporting oxygen. They also play a role in immune function. Due to their circulation time of about 120 days, RBCs make excellent carrier cell membranes for long-lasting drug delivery. They were also the first cell membranes utilized in nanodrug delivery systems. (31) RBC membranes can also target bacteria and absorb pore-forming toxins (PFTs) that are typically released during gram-positive bacterial infections. (32)

  1. WBC (White Blood Cells)

White blood cells, also known as leukocytes, range in size from 7 to 20 ?m in diameter, making them larger than red blood cells. (33)

White Blood Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles: Recent Advances and Medical Applications. (34) White blood cells (WBCs) are typically assessed in standard blood tests and are categorized into five subtypes: basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils. (35)

  1. Platelets

Platelets originate from the cytoplasmic lysis of mature megakaryocytes. Their plasma membrane is equipped with multifunctional membrane proteins, which are crucial for enabling platelets to fulfil their physiological roles in blood haemostasis. Additionally, the capacity of PMNPs to avoid detection by macrophages is believed to be associated with the CD47 receptor. (36)Approximately 150,000 to 350,000 platelets circulate in each microliter of blood to maintain vascular integrity. Their average lifespan is 8 to 9 days. Platelets are well recognized for their critical role in hemostasis following vascular injury, as well as in wound healing, inflammatory responses, and thrombosis. (37).

       
            Various types of WBC.png
       

Figure. 10 Various types of WBC

  1. Cancer cell membrane coated nanoparticles:

Cancer cell membranes are an excellent choice for coating nanoparticles in oncological applications. Cancer cells are resilient and can be cultured in large quantities in vitro, facilitating mass collection of their membranes. They also have the unique ability to self-target similar cells (referred to as homotypic targeting), a trait not commonly found in most other membrane sources. (38).Cancer cell membrane (CCM)-coated nanoplatforms are used to create drug delivery systems (DDSs) for the targeted treatment of tumors with homology. (39)

  1. Cancer steam cell

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been demonstrated to be significantly resistant to standard cancer therapies, including chemotherapy and radiation treatment. (40)

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a subset of cells capable of initiating, self-renewing, and maintaining tumor growth. They play a crucial role in tumor metastasis, recurrence, and resistance to cancer therapies.

Cancer Stem Cell Biology:

Cancer is characterized by a biological condition in which certain cells within a tissue of an organ undergo uncontrolled division and growth. In 1997, Bonnet and Dick discovered that a small subpopulation of these abnormal cells exhibited distinct properties compared to the bulk tumor cells. After isolating this group, they showed that these leukemia-initiating cells shared characteristics with stem cells, leading to the introduction of the concept of cancer stem cells (CSCs). (41)

Cancer stem cells and their markers:

One of the most promising areas of research in cancer therapy is the targeting of cancer stem cells (CSCs). Evidence suggests that the growth and spread of cancer rely on this small subset of cells known as cancer stem cells. (42)

Stem cells exhibit a greater capacity for proliferation, a longer lifespan compared to their progeny, and an increased likelihood of undergoing mutations. (43), (44)

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are known to be significantly resistant to standard cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy. (45)                                                                                                                                       

C) Inorganic nanoparticles:

Inorganic nanoparticles (NPs), with sizes down to a few nanometers and a uniform distribution, are highly appealing as passive or active carriers for tumor targeting. (46)

A) Gold Nanoparticles: Gold nanoparticles feature straightforward surface chemistry that enables a range of surface modifications, making them suitable for creating biocompatible and functional nano-agents for cancer therapy.

       
            schematic representation of gold nanoparticles (47).png
       

Figure. 11 schematic representation of gold nanoparticles (47)

The effectiveness of AuNPs is significantly influenced by their inherent toxicity, so it is essential to examine their toxicological profiles before considering their use in cancer management. (48)

  1. Antibody-Directed Gold Nanoparticles:
    1. IgG antibodies
    2. Antibody fragments and nanobodies
  2. Protein-Directed Gold Nanoparticles
  3. Peptide-Directed Gold Nanoparticles
  4. Aptamer-Directed Gold Nanoparticle
  5. Carbohydrate-Directed Gold Nanoparticles
  6. Small Molecule-Directed Gold Nanoparticles
  7. Gold Nanoparticles with Multiple Targeting Modalities (49)

B) Carbon Nanotubes Nanoparticles:

Carbon nanotubes, first identified by Iijima in 1991, consist of thin sheets of carbon atoms arranged in benzene rings rolled into a seamless tubular shape. This innovative structure is part of the fullerene family, representing the third allotropic form of carbon alongside graphite and diamond (50).Carbon nanotubes are large cylindrical molecules composed of a hexagonal arrangement of sp?2; hybridized carbon atoms, with a C-C distance of approximately 1.4 Å. The walls of carbon nanotubes can consist of one or multiple layers of graphene sheets. When a single sheet is rolled up, it forms single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), while rolling up multiple sheets results in multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). (51)

  • Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) consist of single or multiple concentric graphene sheets rolled into cylindrical shapes, with diameters ranging from 0.4 to 100 nm, and lengths extending up to several micrometers.CNTs can be categorized into A) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and B) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). (52)

       
            Single- walled and  double walled carbon nanotubes. (53).png
       

Figure. 12 Single- walled and  double walled carbon nanotubes. (53)

C) Quantum Dots:

Quantum dots (QDs) are inorganic nanomaterials that possess intrinsic fluorescent, optical, and electronic properties. (54) Quantum dots (QDs) are luminescent semiconductor nanocrystals at the nanoscale. Their distinctive optical characteristics—including high brightness, long-term stability, the ability to detect multiple signals simultaneously, and tunable emission spectra make them attractive candidates for diagnostic and therapeutic applications in oncology. (55)Quantum dots (QDs) serve as nano-carriers for drugs, facilitating targeted drug delivery and enhancing bioavailability in biological applications. Additionally, a QD nano-carrier system has the potential to enable early detection, monitoring, and localized treatment of specific disease sites. (56)Quantum dots (QDs) are a category of nanoscale wide bandgap semiconductors primarily composed of metals, lipids, or polymers. Metal QDs have shown therapeutic potential in early tumor imaging and treatment. However, concerns about biological toxicity have led to the creation of various non-functionalized QDs, including carbon QDs (CQDs), graphene QDs (GQDs), black phosphorus QDs (BPQDs), and perovskite quantum dots (PQDs).

Properties of QDs

QDs are typically semiconductor materials made from binary and ternary alloys derived from groups II-VI, III-V, and IV-VI of the periodic table, with sizes generally ranging from 2 to 20

nm. Their notable advantages include:

(i) good optical stability and relatively long fluorescence lifetimes,
(ii) the ability to simultaneously excite multiple QDs using a single light source, and
(iii) narrower and tunable emission spectra coupled with broader absorption spectra. (5
7)

The most frequently used quantum dots (QDs) include cadmium-based QDs, carbon QDs (CQDs), and graphene QDs (GQDs). (58)

Conventional quantum dots (QDs) consist of a multilayer structure featuring a metallic core material that provides fluorescence. This core is encased in a protective coating that prevents leakage and photobleaching. The most commonly used core materials are cadmium and its derivatives, including cadmium selenide (CdSe) and cadmium sulfide (CdS). These systems have been extensively researched for their stability, size, morphology, photoluminescence, biocompatibility, and toxicity. However, researchers have faced challenges related to low stability, efficacy, and toxicity. (59)

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs), also referred to as carbon  dots or carbon nanodots, are typically smaller than 10 nm and demonstrate enhanced biological properties when compared to traditional semiconductor quantum dots. (60)

These properties encompass high water solubility, strong chemical inertness, ease of processing, and remarkable resistance to photobleaching. The term "carbon dots" was first introduced in 2006 by Sun et al., who chemically synthesized fluorescent carbon nanoparticles using laser ablation of carbon targets followed by surface passivation. (61) Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) are distinct from carbon quantum dots (CQDs) in that they possess an internal graphene lattice, usually measuring less than 100 nm in size and consisting of fewer than ten layers. (62)

The photoluminescence mechanism of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) is mainly affected by edge states, quantum confinement, and surface states. Unlike semi-metallic graphene, GQDs exhibit a non-zero bandgap, allowing them to function as either semiconductors or insulators. The introduction of this bandgap in GQDs improves light absorption and raises the energy spectrum. (63)

       
            Schematic representation of simple Quantum dot assembly (64).png
       

Figure. 13 Schematic representation of simple Quantum dot assembly (64)

D) Silica nanoparticles

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) offer unique advantages due to their large surface area, high pore volume, tunable pore size, diverse surface chemistry, and good biocompatibility, making them promising candidates for cancer diagnosis and treatment. MSN-based delivery systems can enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing cytotoxicity to normal tissues. Additionally, the distinctive properties of MSNs make them suitable for delivering both soluble and insoluble anticancer drugs. (65) The synthesis of monodispersed silica particles utilizes a sol-gel method, first described by Stöber et al. in 1968. This method involves the hydrolysis of tetraalkyl silicates in a solution of alcohol and water, using ammonia as a catalyst, to produce non-porous silica particles. These particles can be engineered to achieve sizes ranging from a few nanometers to several microns. (66) MSNs have been extensively studied for use in combinational chemotherapy, serving as carriers for both phototherapeutics and chemotherapeutics. (67) Fang et al. attached indocyanine green (ICG) to mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods (GNR) to create a carrier for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), aiming to develop a multimodal imaging-guided synergistic therapy. ICG was utilized for fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy (PDT), while 5-FU served as the chemotherapeutic agent. (68)

       
            schematic representation of silica nanoparticles. (69).png
       

Figure 14.  schematic representation of silica nanoparticles. (69)

REFERENCES

  1. Niculescu, A.-G., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2021). Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment—A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(5253).
  2. Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpi?ski, T. M. (2021). Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(173).
  3. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Report on Cancer: Setting Priorities, Investing Wisely and Providing Care for All. Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. American Cancer Society. (2021).  Cancer Facts & Figures 2021. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org.
  5. Park, W., Heo, Y. J., & Han, D. K. (2018). New opportunities for nanoparticles   in cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials Research, 22(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0133-y
  6. Zitvogel, L., Apetoh, L., Ghiringhelli, F., & Kroemer, G. (2008). Immunological aspects of cancer  chemotherapy. Nature Reviews Immunology, 8(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2216
  7. Brigger, I., Dubernet, C., & Couvreur, P. (2012). Nanoparticles in cancer  therapy and diagnosis. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(Supplement), 24–36.
  8. Orimo, A., & Weinberg, R. A. (2006). Stromal Fibroblasts in Cancer: A Novel Tumor-Promoting Cell Type. Cancer Cell, 5(15), 1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.15.3112
  9. Dennis, M. S., Jin, H., Dugger, D., Yang, R., et al. (2007). Novel  Tumor-Targeting Agent. Cancer Research, 67(11).
  10. Allen, T. M. (2002). Ligand-targeted therapeutics  in  anticancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2, 750.
  11. Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008). Application of Nanotechnology  in Cancer Therapy and Imaging. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/CA.2007.0003
  12. Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpi?ski, T. M. (2021). Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(173).
  13. Shin, W. K., Cho, J., Kannan, A., et al. (2016). Cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte using mesoporous methacrylate-functionalized SiO.
  14. Yao, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, L., et al. (2021). Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy and Its Role in Overcoming  Drug  Resistance. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(173).
  15. Naahidi, S., et al. (2013). Biocompatibility of engineered nanoparticles  for  drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 166, 182–194.
  16. Edlund, U., & Albertsson, A. (2002). Degradable polymer microspheres for controlled drug  delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 54(2), 157–182.
  17. Masood, F. (2016). Polymeric nanoparticles for targeted drug  delivery system for cancer therapy. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 60(1).
  18. Giri, P. M., Banerjee, A., & Layek, B. (2023). A Recent Review on Cancer Nanomedicine. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University.
  19. Bharali, D. J., Khalil, M., Gurbuz, M., Simone, T. M., Mousa, S. A. (2011). Nanoparticles and cancer therapy: A concise review with emphasis on dendrimers.
  20. Mohanty, A., Uthaman, S., & Park, I.-K. (2020). Utilization of Polymer-Lipid Hybrid   Nanoparticles for Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapy. Molecules, 25(4377).
  21. Persano, F., Gigli, G., & Leporatti, S. (2021). Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Current overview and future directions. Nano Express, 2(1).
  22. Khalil, N. M., Mainardes, R. M., & Imam, S. S. (2021). Application of Natural Products in the Management of Cancer: Natural Bioenhancers. Natural Product Research, 35(1), 1–21.
  23. Jain, A., Jain, S. K., & Jain, N. K. (2008). Role of Polymers in Enhancing the Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble  Drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 10(1), 227–250.
  24. Kaur, G., Grewal, J., Jyoti, K., et al. (2019). Natural Bioenhancers for Improved Drug Delivery and Bioavailability. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 9(3), 371–387.
  25. Vyas, S. P., & Khar, R. K. (2017). Targeted and Controlled Drug Delivery. CBS Publishers and Distributors.
  26. Sur, S., Rathore, A. S., et al. (2018). Quercetin as a Bioenhancer: A Review of its Role in Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Applications. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 9(4), 122–132.
  27. Singh, B. K., et al. (2020). Nanoparticles of Phytochemicals in Cancer Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Nanoscale, 12(11), 1040–1056.
  28. Siddiqui, N., & Ahuja, R. (2021). Role  of Bioenhancers in Drug Development. Current Drug Delivery, 18(1), 74–89.
  29. Patel, J., & Rathod, D. (2017). Overview of Formulation Strategies to Enhance Bioavailability of  Poorly  Soluble Drugs. Journal of Drug Delivery, 9(3), 1–10.
  30. Sahoo, S. K., Parveen, S., & Panda, J. J. (2007). The Present and Future of Nanotechnology in Human  Health Care. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 3(1), 20–31.
  31. Huang, X., et al. (2021). Advances  in Targeted Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 607(120817).
  32. Bansal, A. K., & Kumari, R. (2020). Polymers as Drug Carriers: A Review. Advances in Pharmaceutical Research, 2(4), 45–62.
  33. Mukherjee, S., et al. (2019). Design and Development of Quercetin  Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 174, 548–556.
  34. Wong, K. H., et al. (2020). Nanomedicine: A Perspective on the Future of Cancer Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(15).
  35. Zhang, L., & Gu, F. X. (2008). Nanoparticles in Medicine: Therapeutic Applications and Developments. Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 8(5), 102–108.
  36. Choudhary, S., et al. (2021). Nanotechnology-Based Delivery of Natural Bioenhancers: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Materials Science & Engineering C, 123(112001).
  37. Liu, H., Su, Y. Y., Jiang, X. C., Gao, J. Q. (2022). Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: A novel multifunctional biomimetic drug delivery system. Controlled Release Society, Published online: 22 November 2022. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  38. Li, R., He, Y., Zhang, S., Qin, J., Wang, J. (2018). Cell membrane-based nanoparticles: A new biomimetic platform for tumor diagnosis and treatment. School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Accepted: 17 November 2017. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  39. Fang, R. H., Hu, C. M. J., Luk, B. T., Gao, W., Copp, J. A., Tai, Y., O’Connor, D. E., Zhang, L. (2022). Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer   vaccination and drug delivery. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  40. Pan, H., Yang, S., Gao, L., Zhou, J., Cheng, W., Chen, G., et al. (2022). At the crossroad of nanotechnology and cancer cell membrane coating: Expanding horizons with engineered nanoplatforms for advanced cancer therapy harnessing homologous tumor targeting. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  41. Hong, I. S., Jang, G. B., Lee, H. Y., Nam, J. S. (2011). Targeting  cancer stem cells using nanoparticles. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  42. Ertas, Y. N., Dorcheh, K. A., Akbari, A., Jabbari, E. (2022). Nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery to cancer stem cells: A review of recent advances. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  43. Ambasta, R. K., Sharma, A., Kumar, P. (2011). Nanoparticle-mediated  targeting of VEGFR and cancer stem cells for cancer therapy. Vascular Cell, 3(1):26. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  44. Clarke, M. F., Dick, J. E., Dirks, P. B., Eaves, C. J., Jamieson, C. H., Jones, D. L., et al. (2006). Cancer stem cells: Perspectives on current status and future directions. Cancer Research, 66, 9339-9344. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  45. Sharma, A., Goyal, A. K., Rath, G. (2018). Recent advances in metal nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Journal of Drug Targeting, 26, 617–632. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  46. Nejabat, M., Samie, A., Ramezani, M., Alibolandi, M., Abnous, K., Taghdisi, S. M. (2022). An overview on gold nanorods as versatile nanoparticles in cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  47. Lim, Z. Z. J., Li, J. E. J., Ng, C. T., Yung, L. Y. L., Bay, B. H. (2011). Gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 32, 983–990. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  48. Goddard, Z. R., Marín, M. J., Russell, D. A., Searcey, M. (2020). Active  targeting of gold nanoparticles as cancer therapeutics. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  49. Ji, S. R., Liu, C., Zhang, B., Yang, F., Xu, J., Long, J., et al. (2010). Carbon nanotubes in cancer diagnosis and therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  50. Zhao, X., Tian, K., Zhou, T., Jia, X., Li, J., Liu, P. (2018). PEGylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes as versatile vectors for tumor-specific intracellular triggered release. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 168, 43–49. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  51. Rastogi, V., Yadav, P., Bhattacharya, S. S., Mishra, A. K., Verma, N., Verma, A., Pandit, J. K. (2014). Carbon nanotubes: An emerging drug carrier for targeting cancer cells. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  52. Kulkarni, N. S., Guerrero, Y., Gupta, N., Mutha, A., Gupta, V. (2018). Exploring potential of quantum dots as dual modality  for cancer therapy and diagnosis. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  53. Li, T., Shi, S., Goel, S., Shen, X., Xie, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). Recent advancements in mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards therapeutic applications  for cancer. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  54. Wu, Y. X., Zhang, D., Hu, X., Peng, R., Li, J., Zhang, X., Tan, W. (2021). Multicolor  two-photon nanosystem for multiplexed intracellular imaging and targeted cancer therapy. Angewandte Chemie, 133, 12677–12684. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  55. Moftakhari Esfahani, M. K., Alavi, S. E., Izake, E. L. (2022). Application of mesoporous  silica  nanoparticles in cancer therapy and delivery of repurposed anthelmintics for cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  56. Luo, J., Long, J., Zhang, B., Liu, C., Xu, J. (2011). Quantum dots in cancer therapy. Journal of Cancer Research, 9(1), 47-58. Published online: 16 December 2011. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  57. [Anonymous]. (2016). The research and applications of quantum dots as nano-carriers for targeted drug delivery and cancer therapy. Nano Review, 11, Article 207. Published: 18 April 2016. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  58. Guo, W., Song, X., Liu, J., Liu, W., Chu, X., Lei, Z. (2024). Quantum dots as a potentiall multifunctional material for the enhancement of clinical diagnosis strategies and cancer treatments. Nanomaterials, 14, Article 1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1413108.
  59. Vibin, M., Vinayakan, R., Fernandez, F. B., John, A., Abraham, A. (2017). A novel  fluorescent quantum dot probe for rapid diagnostic high contrast imaging of tumors in mice. Journal of Fluorescence, 27, 669–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-016-1996-8.
  60. Kim, J., Huy, B. T., Sakthivel, K., Choi, H. J., Joo, W. H., Shin, S. K., et al. (2015). Highly fluorescent CdTe quantum dots with reduced cytotoxicity: A robust biomarker. Sensors and Bio-Sensors Research, 3, 46–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2014.
  61. Wang, Y. F., Hu, A. G. (2014). Carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2, 6921–6939. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  62. Sun, Y. P., Zhou, B., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Fernando, K. A. S., Pathak, P., et al. (2006). Quantum-sized carbon dots for bright and colorful photoluminescence. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128, 7756–7757. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  63. Wang, Y., Zeng, C., Liu, Y., Yang, D., Zhang, Y., Ren, Z., et al. (2022). Constructing heterogeneous photocatalysts based on carbon nitride nanosheets and graphene quantum dots for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Materials, 15, Article 5390. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  64. Zhu, S. J., Wang, L., Li, B., Song, Y. B., Zhao, X. H., Zhang, G. Y., et al. (2014). Investigation of  the   photoluminescence mechanism of graphene quantum dots and evaluation of their assembly into polymer dots. Carbon, 77, 462–473. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  65. [Anonymous]. (Year  Unknown). Quantum dots: An emerging approach for cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  66. Li, T., Shi, S., Goel, S., Shen, X., Xie, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). Recent advancements in  mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards therapeutic applications for cancer. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  67. [Anonymous]. (2011). Tumor  delivery of macromolecular drugs based on the EPR effect. Advanced   Drug Delivery Reviews. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  68. Wu, Y. X., Zhang, D., Hu, X., Peng, R., Li, J., Zhang, X., Tan, W. (2021). Multicolor two-photon  nanosystem for multiplexed intracellular imaging and targeted cancer therapy. Angewandte Chemie, 133, 12677–12684. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  69. Fang, S., Lin, J., Li, C., Huang, P., Hou, W., Zhang, C., et al. (2017). Dual-stimuli responsive nanotheranostics for multimodal imaging guided trimodal synergistic therapy. Small, 13, Article 1602580. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  70. Moftakhari Esfahani, M. K., Alavi, S. E., Izake, E. L., Cabot, P. J., Islam, N. (Year Unknown). Application of  mesoporous silica nanoparticles in cancer therapy and delivery of repurposed anthelmintics for cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].

Reference

  1. Niculescu, A.-G., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2021). Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment—A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(5253).
  2. Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpi?ski, T. M. (2021). Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(173).
  3. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Report on Cancer: Setting Priorities, Investing Wisely and Providing Care for All. Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. American Cancer Society. (2021).  Cancer Facts & Figures 2021. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org.
  5. Park, W., Heo, Y. J., & Han, D. K. (2018). New opportunities for nanoparticles   in cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials Research, 22(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0133-y
  6. Zitvogel, L., Apetoh, L., Ghiringhelli, F., & Kroemer, G. (2008). Immunological aspects of cancer  chemotherapy. Nature Reviews Immunology, 8(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2216
  7. Brigger, I., Dubernet, C., & Couvreur, P. (2012). Nanoparticles in cancer  therapy and diagnosis. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(Supplement), 24–36.
  8. Orimo, A., & Weinberg, R. A. (2006). Stromal Fibroblasts in Cancer: A Novel Tumor-Promoting Cell Type. Cancer Cell, 5(15), 1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.15.3112
  9. Dennis, M. S., Jin, H., Dugger, D., Yang, R., et al. (2007). Novel  Tumor-Targeting Agent. Cancer Research, 67(11).
  10. Allen, T. M. (2002). Ligand-targeted therapeutics  in  anticancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2, 750.
  11. Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008). Application of Nanotechnology  in Cancer Therapy and Imaging. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/CA.2007.0003
  12. Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpi?ski, T. M. (2021). Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(173).
  13. Shin, W. K., Cho, J., Kannan, A., et al. (2016). Cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte using mesoporous methacrylate-functionalized SiO.
  14. Yao, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, L., et al. (2021). Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy and Its Role in Overcoming  Drug  Resistance. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(173).
  15. Naahidi, S., et al. (2013). Biocompatibility of engineered nanoparticles  for  drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 166, 182–194.
  16. Edlund, U., & Albertsson, A. (2002). Degradable polymer microspheres for controlled drug  delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 54(2), 157–182.
  17. Masood, F. (2016). Polymeric nanoparticles for targeted drug  delivery system for cancer therapy. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 60(1).
  18. Giri, P. M., Banerjee, A., & Layek, B. (2023). A Recent Review on Cancer Nanomedicine. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University.
  19. Bharali, D. J., Khalil, M., Gurbuz, M., Simone, T. M., Mousa, S. A. (2011). Nanoparticles and cancer therapy: A concise review with emphasis on dendrimers.
  20. Mohanty, A., Uthaman, S., & Park, I.-K. (2020). Utilization of Polymer-Lipid Hybrid   Nanoparticles for Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapy. Molecules, 25(4377).
  21. Persano, F., Gigli, G., & Leporatti, S. (2021). Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Current overview and future directions. Nano Express, 2(1).
  22. Khalil, N. M., Mainardes, R. M., & Imam, S. S. (2021). Application of Natural Products in the Management of Cancer: Natural Bioenhancers. Natural Product Research, 35(1), 1–21.
  23. Jain, A., Jain, S. K., & Jain, N. K. (2008). Role of Polymers in Enhancing the Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble  Drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 10(1), 227–250.
  24. Kaur, G., Grewal, J., Jyoti, K., et al. (2019). Natural Bioenhancers for Improved Drug Delivery and Bioavailability. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 9(3), 371–387.
  25. Vyas, S. P., & Khar, R. K. (2017). Targeted and Controlled Drug Delivery. CBS Publishers and Distributors.
  26. Sur, S., Rathore, A. S., et al. (2018). Quercetin as a Bioenhancer: A Review of its Role in Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Applications. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 9(4), 122–132.
  27. Singh, B. K., et al. (2020). Nanoparticles of Phytochemicals in Cancer Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Nanoscale, 12(11), 1040–1056.
  28. Siddiqui, N., & Ahuja, R. (2021). Role  of Bioenhancers in Drug Development. Current Drug Delivery, 18(1), 74–89.
  29. Patel, J., & Rathod, D. (2017). Overview of Formulation Strategies to Enhance Bioavailability of  Poorly  Soluble Drugs. Journal of Drug Delivery, 9(3), 1–10.
  30. Sahoo, S. K., Parveen, S., & Panda, J. J. (2007). The Present and Future of Nanotechnology in Human  Health Care. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 3(1), 20–31.
  31. Huang, X., et al. (2021). Advances  in Targeted Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 607(120817).
  32. Bansal, A. K., & Kumari, R. (2020). Polymers as Drug Carriers: A Review. Advances in Pharmaceutical Research, 2(4), 45–62.
  33. Mukherjee, S., et al. (2019). Design and Development of Quercetin  Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 174, 548–556.
  34. Wong, K. H., et al. (2020). Nanomedicine: A Perspective on the Future of Cancer Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(15).
  35. Zhang, L., & Gu, F. X. (2008). Nanoparticles in Medicine: Therapeutic Applications and Developments. Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 8(5), 102–108.
  36. Choudhary, S., et al. (2021). Nanotechnology-Based Delivery of Natural Bioenhancers: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Materials Science & Engineering C, 123(112001).
  37. Liu, H., Su, Y. Y., Jiang, X. C., Gao, J. Q. (2022). Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: A novel multifunctional biomimetic drug delivery system. Controlled Release Society, Published online: 22 November 2022. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  38. Li, R., He, Y., Zhang, S., Qin, J., Wang, J. (2018). Cell membrane-based nanoparticles: A new biomimetic platform for tumor diagnosis and treatment. School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Accepted: 17 November 2017. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  39. Fang, R. H., Hu, C. M. J., Luk, B. T., Gao, W., Copp, J. A., Tai, Y., O’Connor, D. E., Zhang, L. (2022). Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer   vaccination and drug delivery. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  40. Pan, H., Yang, S., Gao, L., Zhou, J., Cheng, W., Chen, G., et al. (2022). At the crossroad of nanotechnology and cancer cell membrane coating: Expanding horizons with engineered nanoplatforms for advanced cancer therapy harnessing homologous tumor targeting. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  41. Hong, I. S., Jang, G. B., Lee, H. Y., Nam, J. S. (2011). Targeting  cancer stem cells using nanoparticles. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  42. Ertas, Y. N., Dorcheh, K. A., Akbari, A., Jabbari, E. (2022). Nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery to cancer stem cells: A review of recent advances. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  43. Ambasta, R. K., Sharma, A., Kumar, P. (2011). Nanoparticle-mediated  targeting of VEGFR and cancer stem cells for cancer therapy. Vascular Cell, 3(1):26. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  44. Clarke, M. F., Dick, J. E., Dirks, P. B., Eaves, C. J., Jamieson, C. H., Jones, D. L., et al. (2006). Cancer stem cells: Perspectives on current status and future directions. Cancer Research, 66, 9339-9344. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  45. Sharma, A., Goyal, A. K., Rath, G. (2018). Recent advances in metal nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Journal of Drug Targeting, 26, 617–632. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  46. Nejabat, M., Samie, A., Ramezani, M., Alibolandi, M., Abnous, K., Taghdisi, S. M. (2022). An overview on gold nanorods as versatile nanoparticles in cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  47. Lim, Z. Z. J., Li, J. E. J., Ng, C. T., Yung, L. Y. L., Bay, B. H. (2011). Gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 32, 983–990. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  48. Goddard, Z. R., Marín, M. J., Russell, D. A., Searcey, M. (2020). Active  targeting of gold nanoparticles as cancer therapeutics. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  49. Ji, S. R., Liu, C., Zhang, B., Yang, F., Xu, J., Long, J., et al. (2010). Carbon nanotubes in cancer diagnosis and therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  50. Zhao, X., Tian, K., Zhou, T., Jia, X., Li, J., Liu, P. (2018). PEGylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes as versatile vectors for tumor-specific intracellular triggered release. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 168, 43–49. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  51. Rastogi, V., Yadav, P., Bhattacharya, S. S., Mishra, A. K., Verma, N., Verma, A., Pandit, J. K. (2014). Carbon nanotubes: An emerging drug carrier for targeting cancer cells. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  52. Kulkarni, N. S., Guerrero, Y., Gupta, N., Mutha, A., Gupta, V. (2018). Exploring potential of quantum dots as dual modality  for cancer therapy and diagnosis. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  53. Li, T., Shi, S., Goel, S., Shen, X., Xie, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). Recent advancements in mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards therapeutic applications  for cancer. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  54. Wu, Y. X., Zhang, D., Hu, X., Peng, R., Li, J., Zhang, X., Tan, W. (2021). Multicolor  two-photon nanosystem for multiplexed intracellular imaging and targeted cancer therapy. Angewandte Chemie, 133, 12677–12684. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  55. Moftakhari Esfahani, M. K., Alavi, S. E., Izake, E. L. (2022). Application of mesoporous  silica  nanoparticles in cancer therapy and delivery of repurposed anthelmintics for cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  56. Luo, J., Long, J., Zhang, B., Liu, C., Xu, J. (2011). Quantum dots in cancer therapy. Journal of Cancer Research, 9(1), 47-58. Published online: 16 December 2011. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  57. [Anonymous]. (2016). The research and applications of quantum dots as nano-carriers for targeted drug delivery and cancer therapy. Nano Review, 11, Article 207. Published: 18 April 2016. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  58. Guo, W., Song, X., Liu, J., Liu, W., Chu, X., Lei, Z. (2024). Quantum dots as a potentiall multifunctional material for the enhancement of clinical diagnosis strategies and cancer treatments. Nanomaterials, 14, Article 1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1413108.
  59. Vibin, M., Vinayakan, R., Fernandez, F. B., John, A., Abraham, A. (2017). A novel  fluorescent quantum dot probe for rapid diagnostic high contrast imaging of tumors in mice. Journal of Fluorescence, 27, 669–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-016-1996-8.
  60. Kim, J., Huy, B. T., Sakthivel, K., Choi, H. J., Joo, W. H., Shin, S. K., et al. (2015). Highly fluorescent CdTe quantum dots with reduced cytotoxicity: A robust biomarker. Sensors and Bio-Sensors Research, 3, 46–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2014.
  61. Wang, Y. F., Hu, A. G. (2014). Carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2, 6921–6939. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  62. Sun, Y. P., Zhou, B., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Fernando, K. A. S., Pathak, P., et al. (2006). Quantum-sized carbon dots for bright and colorful photoluminescence. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128, 7756–7757. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  63. Wang, Y., Zeng, C., Liu, Y., Yang, D., Zhang, Y., Ren, Z., et al. (2022). Constructing heterogeneous photocatalysts based on carbon nitride nanosheets and graphene quantum dots for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Materials, 15, Article 5390. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  64. Zhu, S. J., Wang, L., Li, B., Song, Y. B., Zhao, X. H., Zhang, G. Y., et al. (2014). Investigation of  the   photoluminescence mechanism of graphene quantum dots and evaluation of their assembly into polymer dots. Carbon, 77, 462–473. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  65. [Anonymous]. (Year  Unknown). Quantum dots: An emerging approach for cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  66. Li, T., Shi, S., Goel, S., Shen, X., Xie, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). Recent advancements in  mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards therapeutic applications for cancer. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  67. [Anonymous]. (2011). Tumor  delivery of macromolecular drugs based on the EPR effect. Advanced   Drug Delivery Reviews. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  68. Wu, Y. X., Zhang, D., Hu, X., Peng, R., Li, J., Zhang, X., Tan, W. (2021). Multicolor two-photon  nanosystem for multiplexed intracellular imaging and targeted cancer therapy. Angewandte Chemie, 133, 12677–12684. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  69. Fang, S., Lin, J., Li, C., Huang, P., Hou, W., Zhang, C., et al. (2017). Dual-stimuli responsive nanotheranostics for multimodal imaging guided trimodal synergistic therapy. Small, 13, Article 1602580. DOI: [Include DOI if available].
  70. Moftakhari Esfahani, M. K., Alavi, S. E., Izake, E. L., Cabot, P. J., Islam, N. (Year Unknown). Application of  mesoporous silica nanoparticles in cancer therapy and delivery of repurposed anthelmintics for cancer therapy. DOI: [Include DOI if available].

Photo
Shinde Nikita
Corresponding author

Rashtrasant Janardhan Swami College Of Pharmacy, Kokamthan, Kopargaon

Photo
Dhomase Rutuja
Co-author

Rashtrasant Janardhan swami college of Pharmacy, Kokamthan, Kopargaon

Photo
Thorat Suvarna
Co-author

Rashtrasant Janardhan swami college of Pharmacy, Kokamthan, Kopargaon

Shinde Nikita*, Dhomase Rutuja, Thorat Suvarna, Novel tumor targeting nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2024, Vol 2, Issue 12, 136-151. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14259312

More related articles
A Case Report On Bartter Syndrome...
Amal A, Sreehariharan J. M., Ajima K. S., Shaiju S. Dharan, Dhany...
Concept And Recent Advancement In Tablet Coating T...
Shrikant S. Dongare, Mr. Dnyaneshwar S. Vyavhare, Dr. Megha T. Sa...
Losartan-H Induced Steven Johnson’s Syndrome –...
Midhun M Nair, Sai Keerthana P. C., Thahsin, Shifna E. P., Shirin...
Formulation and Development of Metformin Sustained Release Tablets by Hydrophili...
Subhajit Roy, Mayukh Jana, Amlan Bishal, Anwesha Adak, ...
Tolvaptan : Vasopressin Antagonist for Hyponatremia...
Kondeti Venkata Surya Siva Kumar, Saripella Latha Sree, Saripella Jaya Sree, ...
Nanotechnology In Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and F...
Mangesh Pede, Shivprasad deokar , Dr. Rajendra kawade, ...
Related Articles
A Overview of the Transdermal Drug Delivery System...
Anurag Mishra, Mohd. Aqil Siddiqui, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Microspheres Containing Non-Steroidal Ant...
Muggu Sankara bhavani, K. ChandraSekhar Gupta, A. Brahma Reddy, G. Venkata Vasu, ...
Ancient methods and Novel methods of Insulin delivery...
Pallavi Saxena, Mohd Shuaib, Abhinay Gupta, ...
An Effective Quantitative Gas Chromatography-Head Space Method Development And V...
Radharavi K , P.D. Gokulana, K. L. Senthil Kumara, R. Ramyaa, M. Karthik, ...
A Case Report On Bartter Syndrome...
Amal A, Sreehariharan J. M., Ajima K. S., Shaiju S. Dharan, Dhanya Dharman, ...
More related articles
A Case Report On Bartter Syndrome...
Amal A, Sreehariharan J. M., Ajima K. S., Shaiju S. Dharan, Dhanya Dharman, ...
Concept And Recent Advancement In Tablet Coating Technologies: A Comprehensive R...
Shrikant S. Dongare, Mr. Dnyaneshwar S. Vyavhare, Dr. Megha T. Salve, ...
Losartan-H Induced Steven Johnson’s Syndrome – A Case Report...
Midhun M Nair, Sai Keerthana P. C., Thahsin, Shifna E. P., Shirin, ...
A Case Report On Bartter Syndrome...
Amal A, Sreehariharan J. M., Ajima K. S., Shaiju S. Dharan, Dhanya Dharman, ...
Concept And Recent Advancement In Tablet Coating Technologies: A Comprehensive R...
Shrikant S. Dongare, Mr. Dnyaneshwar S. Vyavhare, Dr. Megha T. Salve, ...
Losartan-H Induced Steven Johnson’s Syndrome – A Case Report...
Midhun M Nair, Sai Keerthana P. C., Thahsin, Shifna E. P., Shirin, ...