View Article

  • 1,2,4-Triazole Derivatives Targeting Fungal 14-Alpha Demethylase Enzyme: An Insilico Approach

  • Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai 603319

Abstract

Fungal infections remain a major health concern due to increasing resistance against existing antifungal agents. In this review, novel 1,2,4-triazole derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their antifungal potential using in silico molecular docking and ADMET predictions. Docking studies revealed strong binding affinities of several compounds toward fungal target proteins, comparable or superior to standard azole drugs. Pharmacokinetic profiling showed good oral bioavailability, compliance with Lipinski’s rule, acceptable solubility, and high gastrointestinal absorption. Toxicity predictions indicated low risks of mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and hepatotoxicity with minimal inhibition of major CYP450 enzymes, suggesting a low potential for drug-drug interactions. Overall, the findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these synthesized triazole derivatives and warrant further invitro and in vivo evaluation of antifungal drug development.

Keywords

1,2,4-triazole derivatives, antifungal agents, molecular docking, ADMET, toxicity prediction, drug-likeness

Introduction

Fungal infection is growing health concern, with an estimated 1.5million deaths annually caused by invasive fungal infection. These infections are caused by a variety of fungal species, including Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus. Antifungal therapies are used to treat these infections, but rise of antifungal resistance has become a major challenge in the field. Fungal infections are caused by fungi that invade the tissues of humans and other animals. There are many different types of fungi that can cause infections, including yeasts and Molds. Some common fungal infections including athlete’s foot, jock itch, ringworm, and thrush. Fungal infections can affect different parts of the body, including the skin, nails and lungs. Other types of fungal infections can affect the lungs, like aspergillosis and histoplasmosis. Some types of fungal infections can be serious and even life-threatening, especially in people with weakened immune systems, such as those with HIV/AIDS or cancer or those taking immunosuppressive medications. Some of the common fungal infections: Athlete’s foot: It is also known as tinea pedis, is a common fungal infection that affects the skin on the feet. Athlete’s foot can cause symptoms such as itching, burning and cracking of the skin between the  toes and the soles of the feet. Ringworm: Ringworm is a common fungal infection that affects the skin, hair and nails. Ringworm is highly contagious and can spread through direct contact with an infected person, animal or object. The azole antifungal includes two broad classes, imidazole and triazoles. The systemic triazoles are more slowly metabolized and have less effect on human sterol synthesis than do the imidazole’s. Because of these advantages, new congeners under the development are mostly triazoles, not imidazole’s(1).

MECHANSIM OF ACTION

The major effects of triazoles on fungi is inhibition of 14-alpha-demethylase, a microsomal cytochrome 450-dependent enzyme system. Triazoles thus impair the biosynthesis of ergosterol for the cytoplasmic membrane and lead to the accumulation of 14-alpha-methylsterols.These methyl sterols may disrupt the close packing  acyl chains of phospholipids, impairing the functions of certain membrane bound enzyme systems such as ATPase and enzymes of the electron transport system and thus inhibiting growth of the fungi(2,3,4).

INTRODUCTION ABOUT TRIAZOLE

In the last few decades, the chemistry of 1,2,4 triazoles and their fused heterocyclic derivatives. Have received considerable attention owing to their synthetic and effective biological importance.1,2,4 triazole moiety has been incorporated into a wide variety of therapeutically interesting drug candidates including antifungal, antibacterial, analgesics and anti-inflammatory, Antineoplastic, anticonvulsant, antiviral etc. The triazole is the five-membered three nitrogen containing heterocyclic aromatic ring. Triazole play a key role in various biological mechanism related to infections, cancer, Convulsions, inflammation and neurodegeneration. The 1,2,4-triazole are five membered and sp3 hybridization molecule. The synthesis and development of new 1,2,4-triazoles with low toxicity and inhibit the fungal Growth.

CHEMISTRY AND STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP

  • 1,2,4 triazole is one of a pair of isomeric chemical compounds.
  • Molecular formula: C2H3N3
  • It has five-membered ring of two carbon atoms and three nitrogen atoms.
  • 1,2,4 triazole is a basic aromatic heterocycle(5).

DRUG DISCOVERY- Drug discovery is a multidisciplinary scientific process aimed at identifying new therapeutic compounds that can prevent, cure or manage diseases. The modern drug discovery process integrates principles from chemistry, biology, pharmacology, and computational sciences to design and develop novel molecules with optimal efficacy and safety profiles.(6)

MOLECULAR DOCKING -Molecular docking is a powerful computational technique used to predict the interaction between a ligand and a target molecule, typically a protein or nucleic acid. The fundamental principle of molecular docking is to stimulate the binding of a ligand to the active site of a target molecules to evaluate the strength of this interaction using scoring functions(7).

SWISS ADME- Swiss ADME is a free, web-based computational tool, for predicting the physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics properties. It is widely used in drug discovery and development to assess the Absorption, Distribution, ,Metabolism, and Excretion. One of its standout features is the BOILED -EGG model, which provides a visual prediction of gastrointestinal absorption and blood brain permeability.

PROTOX III-Protox is online tool used for toxicity prediction in drug discovery and chemical research. It helps researcher predict the potential toxicity of small molecules based on their chemical structure. It is designed to predict LD 50 values (lethal dose for 50% of population),Toxicity classes(I to VI),Possible toxicological pathways, Organ toxicity. The objective of this study was to compare the docking efficiency of PyRx , a free molecular docking software with that of an Auto dock 4.2.6, which is used and to find a potent 14-alpha demethylase using the best docking software found(8).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Table 1: Derivative structure and its IUPAC name

SR.NO

STRUCTURE

IUPAC NAME

1.

 

 

N-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]acetamide

2.

 

 

N-[3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]acetamide

3.

 

 

N-[3-(3-bromophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]acetamide

4.

 

 

N-{3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl}acetamide

5.

 

 

N-[3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]acetamide

6.

 

 

N-[3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]acetamide

7.

 

 

3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

8.

 

 

3-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

9.

 

 

N-(4-methylphenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

10.

 

 

3-(3-bromophenyl)-N-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

11.

 

 

N-(4-methylphenyl)-3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

12.

 

 

3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-N-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

13.

 

 

N-(4-methylphenyl)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

14.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

15.

 

 

3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-cyclohexyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

16.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

17.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

18.

 

 

3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-cyclohexyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

19.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

20.

 

 

3-(3-bromophenyl)-N-cyclohexyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

21.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

22.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

23.

 

 

N-cyclohexyl-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

 

24.

 

 

3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

25.

 

 

3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

26.

 

 

3-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

27.

 

 

3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

28.

 

 

N-phenyl-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

29.

 

 

3-(4-nitrophenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

30.

 

 

3-(3-bromophenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

31.

 

 

N-phenyl-3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

32.

 

 

3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-N-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

33.

 

 

N-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

34.

 

 

N-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

35.

 

 

N-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

36.

 

 

N-[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

37.

 

 

N-[3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

38.

 

 

N-[3-(3-bromophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

39.

 

 

N-{3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl}pyridin-2-amine

40.

 

 

N-[3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

41.

 

 

N-[3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]pyridin-2-amine

42.

 

 

3-(4-methylphenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

43.

 

 

3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

44.

 

 

3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

45.

 

 

3-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

46.

 

 

3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

47.

 

 

3-(4-nitrophenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

48.

 

 

3-(3-bromophenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

49.

 

 

N-(trichloromethyl)-3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

50.

 

 

3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-N-(trichloromethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

51.

 

 

N-(trichloromethyl)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine

52.

 

 

N-[3-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

53.

 

 

N-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

54.

 

 

N-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

55.

 

 

N-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

56.

 

 

N-[3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

57.

 

 

N-[3-(3-bromophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

58.

 

 

N-{3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl}quinolin-6-amine

59.

 

 

N-[3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

60.

 

 

N-[3-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]quinolin-6-amine

/0

Software Used

    • Chemsketch Ultra
    • Discovery Studio
    • PyRx
    • Autodock 1.3.7
    • SWISS ADME
    • PROTOX III

Preparation Of Ligand

Synthetic 1,2,4 triazole derivatives are drawed using chemsketch against 14 alpha demethylase enzymes. Total 60 derivative were selected all of these derivative analogues were added with hydrogens, energy minimization is done.

Preparation Of Protein Structure

The crystal structure of 3JUV and 5FRB protein fragment retrieved from Protein Data Bank(PDB) have the pharmacological targets for development of new drugs to treat fungal disease. We removed all of the heteroatoms of both receptors such as water molecules, bound ligands and any other co crystallized solvent from the PDB file.

Figure 1: 5FRB protein structure

Figure 2: 3JUV protein structure

PyRx

PyRx is a user-friendly open-source virtual screening software that integrates several computational tools for drug discovery. It is widely used in academic and research settings for molecular docking and virtual screening studies. PyRx utilizes Autodock and Autodock Vina as its docking engines. Ligand structures can be prepared by minimizing their energy using open babel, which is integrated into PyRx. The software allows flexible ligand docking by treating the ligand as a rotatable torsion tree, while the protein is usually kept rigid. The binding site of the protein can be defined by setting up a grid box, which focuses the docking simulation in a specific region of interest. PyRx supports batch docking of multiple ligands, which is particularly useful for screening phytochemicals. Each ligand is docked into the proteins active site, and binding affinities(binding energy scores) are calculated using the Autodock vina scoring function. The conformations with the lowest binding energies are considered the most favourable and further analysed to assess their interactions with the active site residue of the target protein.

Autodock 4.2.6

Autodock 4.2.6 is a widely used molecular docking tool designed for predicting the binding of small molecules (ligands) to a receptor(usually a protein). It utilises a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm, which is a combination of a genetic algorithm and local search method, to explore the conformational space of the ligand. In this study, flexible ligand docking was performed  using Autodock. The ligand molecules were drawn and energy minimized and converted to PDBQT format using Autodock Tools. The protein structure of the 3JUV and 5FRB was retrieved from the RCSB Protein Data Bank and the receptor was prepared by removing water molecules and adding polar hydrogens. Kollman charges were added to the protein. The grid box was set around the active site of the receptor to define the docking region. Autodock uses an energy-based scoring function to evaluate binding poses, accounting for electrostatic interactions, hydrogen binding, desolvation effects, and van der Waals forces(9,10).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 2 :Comparison of docking score using PyRx and Autodock 4.2.6 with standard antifungal drugs

SR.NO

PYRX

AUTODOCK

 

3JUV

5FRB

3JUV

5FRB

Fluconazole

-8.6

-6.2

-8.224

-7.658

Isavuconazole

-8.1

-7.5

-9.231

-9.231

Itraconazole

-7.6

-8.1

-7.652

-8.474

Posaconazole

-8.5

-8.8

-8.211

-8.333

Voriconazole

-5.3

-6.9

-6.111

-7.984

Deri  1

-7.2

-8.8

-6.500

-8.631

Deri  2

-8.0

-8.3

-8.022

-9.778

Deri  3

-7.2

-8.4

-8.828

-8.532

Deri  4

-8.2

-9.0

-7.859

-8.844

Deri  5

-8.6

-8.9

-8.512

-8.922

Deri  6

-7.2

-7.8

-8.202

-9.043

Deri  7

-8.9

-8.8

-8.411

-9.722

Deri  8

-8.8

-8.8

-6.589

-8.247

Deri  9

-9.2

-9.1

-7.883

-7.878

Deri  10

-7.6

-9.0

-7.667

-8.557

Deri  11

-9.1

-10.1

-7.923

-7.550

Deri  12

-9.3

-9.8

-7.228

-9.203

Deri  13

-7.6

-8.4

-6.500

-8.631

Deri  14

-9.0

-8.6

-7.982

-8.202

Deri  15

-7.9

-9.5

-10.249

-8.411

Deri  16

-6.9

-8.3

-9.142

-6.589

Deri  17

-7.5

-8.3

-8.631

-7.883

Deri  18

-7.5

-8.6

-9.778

-7.667

Deri  19

-9.4

-8.3

-8.532

-7.923

Deri  20

-6.8

-8.4

-8.844

-7.228

Deri  21

-7.9

-9.8

-8.922

-8.560

Deri  22

-7.1

-9.1

-9.043

-9.001

Deri  23

-7.0

-8.1

-9.722

-6.880

Deri  24

-7.8

-9.4

-8.247

-7.122

Deri  25

-6.3

-8.3

-7.878

-9.445

Deri  26

-8.0

-8.9

-8.557

-9.288

Deri  27

-7.2

-8.8

-7.550

-6.552

Deri  28

-6.5

-8.2

-9.203

-9.445

Deri  29

-7.4

-8.6

-7.694

-8.635

Deri  30

-7.6

-8.6

-8.336

-9.801

Deri  31

-8.0

-9.6

-8.306

-8.430

Deri  32

-7.5

-9.4

-8.011

-8.871

Deri  33

-7.6

-9.1

-10.590

-8.956

Deri  34

-7.2

-8.2

-7.846

-8.107

Deri  35

-7.3

-8.8

-6.500

-7.982

Deri  36

-7.3

-8.7

-8.022

-10.249

Deri  37

-6.5

-8.5

-8.828

-9.142

Deri  38

-7.1

-8.5

-7.859

-8.631

Deri  39

-8.2

-9.6

-8.512

-9.778

Deri  40

-7.5

-9.3

-8.202

-8.532

Deri  41

-6.7

-7.3

-8.411

-8.844

Deri  42

-6.7

-7.2

-6.589

-8.922

Deri  43

-6.7

-7.2

-7.883

-9.043

Deri  44

-6.1

-7.4

-7.667

-9.722

Deri  45

-7.3

-7.6

-7.923

-8.247

Deri  46

-6.7

-7.2

-7.228

-7.878

Deri  47

-7.0

--7.4

-8.560

-8.557

Deri  48

-6.5

-7.3

-9.001

-7.550

Deri  49

-8.2

-8.5

-6.880

-9.203

Deri  50

-7.2

-7.8

-7.122

-7.694

Deri  51

-6.1

-6.9

-9.445

-8.336

Deri  52

-8.4

-8.7

-9.288

-6.500

Deri  53

-8.6

-9.2

-6.552

-8.022

Deri  54

-7.1

-8.2

-9.445

-8.828

Deri  55

-8.0

-8.7

-8.635

-7.859

Deri  56

-8.9

-8.5

-9.801

-8.512

Deri 57

-8.4

-8.3

-8.430

-8.202

Deri 58

-8.5

-9.5

-8.871

-8.411

Deri  59

-7.8

-7.9

-8.956

-6.589

Deri 60

-7.8

-9.1

-8.107

-7.883

Molecular docking was performed to evaluate the binding affinities of synthesized 1,2,4-triazole derivatives (Deri1-Deri60) compared to standard antifungal drug(fluconazole, Isavuconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole and Voriconazole). Docking studies were carried out using two different software platforms, PyRx and 4.2.6 against two fungal target proteins 3JUV and 5FRB. The standard drugs exhibited docking score ranging from PyRx:-5.3 to -8.8kcal/mol. Autodock:-6.211 to -9.231kcal/mol. Among them, isavuconazole and posaconazole showed the most favourable binding energies both targets.

The synthesised derivatives displayed a wide range of binding affinities. Notably, many derivatives exhibited better docking scores than standard drugs. Derivative 28 showed a docking score of -9.203(3JUV) and -9.445(5FRB) using auto dock, surpassing even the reference drugs. Derivative 34, derivative 35 and derivative 38 also demonstrated strong binding affinities, with values around -10.590 and-10.249(3JUV), suggesting excellent interaction with the protein binding sites. The data confirms that several synthesized triazole derivatives particularly deri28,deri34 and deri38,may possess promising antifungal agents(11,12).

Table 3: Comparing the pharmacokinetic properties with standard antifungal drug and 1,2,4 triazole derivatives

Compound

M.W (g/mol)

Number of heavy

Atoms

Num

aromatic heavy atoms

Fraction Csp3

No. rotatable

bonds

No. H bond

Acceptors

No.H bond donors

Molar refractivity

TPSA

LOG PO/W

Log S

S1

306.27

22

16

0.23

1

7

1

70.71

81.65

-0.41

-2.17

S2

437.47

31

22

0.18

6

1

7

111.46

115.86

-2.93

-4.91

S3

705.63

49

28

0.37

7

11

0

194.53

104.70

-5.26

-7.48

S4

700

51

28

0.41

12

1

9

194.12

115.70

5.22

-6.69

S5

306.27

22

16

0.23

5

1

7

70.71

81.65

0.41

-2.17

1.

260.33

19

6

0.43

4

3

3

86.43

65.52

-2.32

-3.75

2.

247.21

18

11

0.10

4

5

2

64.95

111.49

0.17

-2.18

3.

283.12

16

6

0.20

3

2

3

74.86

65.52

-2.82

-3.10

4.

272.23

19

6

0.27

4

5

3

72.16

65.52

-2.93

-3.29

5.

232.28

17

6

0.33

3

2

3

77.09

65.52

-2.96

-3.13

6.

294.31

21

6

0.38

6

6

3

86.64

93.21

-2.22

-2.50

7.

282.34

21

12

0.19

4

3

3

94.83

57.68

-2.14

-4.64

8.

270.30

20

12

0.13

3

3

3

88.30

48.45

-1.65

-4.58

9.

297.31

22

12

0.13

4

4

3

97.16

94.27

-0.98

-4.00

10.

331.21

20

12

0.13

3

2

3

96.04

48.45

-1.52

-4.95

11.

320.31

23

12

0.19

4

5

3

93.34

48.45

-1.28

-4.88

12.

280.37

21

12

0.24

3

2

3

98.27

48.45

-2.75

-4.64

13.

342.39

25

6

0.28

6

5

3

107.81

76.14

-1.16

-4.25

14.

258.36

19

6

0.53

3

2

3

89.04

48.45

-2.53

-3.66

15.

300.44

12

6

0.61

4

2

3

103.35

48.45

-.34

-4.65

16.

274.36

20

6

0.53

4

3

3

90.57

57.68

-1.82

-3.44

17.

262.33

19

6

0.50

3

3

3

84.03

48.45

-2.45

-3.52

18.

278.78

19

6

0.50

3

2

3

89.09

48.45

-1.50

-3.96

19.

289.33

21

6

0.50

4

4

3

92.90

94.27

-1.86

-3.43

20.

323.23

19

6

0.50

3

2

3

89.08

48.45

-1.87

-4.27

21.

312.33

22

6

0.53

4

5

3

94.01

48.45

-2.48

-4.23

22.

272.39

20

6

0.56

3

2

3

103.55

48.45

-3.97

-4.22

23.

334.41

24

6

0.59

6

5

3

102.64

76.14

-0.92

-3.60

24.

294.39

22

12

0.28

4

2

3

89.86

48.45

-2.30

-5.01

25.

268.31

20

12

0.13

4

3

3

83.33

57.68

-2.58

-3.81

26.

256.28

19

12

0.07

3

3

3

88.38

48.45

-2.76

-4.35

27.

272.73

19

12

0.07

3

2

3

102.85

48.45

-1.97

-3.94

28.

328.37

24

12

0.24

6

5

3

92.19

76.14

-2.44

-3.80

29.

283.29

21

12

0.07

4

4

3

95.2

94.27

-3.34

-4.66

30.

317.18

19

12

0.07

3

2

3

91.07

48.45

-2.07

-3.91

31.

306.29

22

12

0.13

4

5

3

88.37

48.45

-2.32

-4.58

32.

266.34

20

12

0.19

3

2

3

93.30

48.45

-2.43

-4.35

33.

295.38

22

12

0.29

4

3

3

100.44

61.34

-3.79

-4.55

34.

269.30

20

12

0.14

4

4

3

87.66

70.57

-2.43

-3.35

35.

257.27

19

12

0.08

3

4

3

81.13

61.34

-3.23

-3.45

36.

273.72

19

12

0.08

3

3

3

86.18

61.34

2.07

3.89

37.

284.27

21

12

0.08

4

5

3

89.99

107.16

-2.44

-3.34

38.

318.17

19

12

0.08

3

3

3

88.87

61.34

-2.44

-4.20

39.

307.27

22

12

0.08

4

6

3

86.17

61.34

-3.31

-4.13

40.

267.33

20

12

0.14

3

3

3

91.10

61.34

-2.81

-3.89

41.

329.35

24

12

0.20

6

6

3

100.64

89.03

-2.06

-3.48

42.

293.58

17

12

0.30

3

2

3

81.55

48.45

-2.14

-4.21

43.

335.66

20

12

0.46

4

2

3

95.85

48.45

-1.72

-4.98

44.

309.58

18

12

0.30

4

3

3

83.07

57.68

-2.49

-3.99

45.

297.54

17

12

0.22

4

3

 

76.54

48.45

-1.91

-3.86

46.

314.00

17

12

0.22

3

2

3

81.59

48.45

-1.94

-4.51

47.

324.55

19

12

0.22

3

4

3

85.40

94.27

-2.46

-3.76

48.

358.45

17

12

0.22

4

2

3

84.28

48.45

-1.84

-4.83

49.

347.55

20

12

0.30

3

5

3

81.58

48.45

-2.26

-4.55

50.

307.31

18

12

0.36

4

2

3

86.51

48.45

-1.85

-4.30

51.

369.63

22

12

0.42

3

5

3

96.06

76.14

-1.09

-3.93

52.

303.36

23

12

0.11

6

3

3

103.64

61.34

-2.74

-4.58

53.

345.44

26

12

0.24

3

3

3

117.94

61.34

-1.81

-5.54

54.

319.36

24

12

0.11

4

4

3

105.17

70.57

-2.29

-4.35

55.

307.32

23

12

0.06

3

4

3

98.63

61.34

-1.70

-4.44

56.

334.33

25

12

0.06

4

5

3

107.50

107.66

-1.93

-4.33

57.

368.23

23

12

0.06

3

3

3

106.37

61.34

-1.68

-5.19

58.

357.33

26

12

0.11

4

6

3

103.68

61.34

-2.02

-5.12

59.

379.41

28

12

0.20

6

6

3

118.15

89.03

-1.78

-4.48

60.

317.39

24

12

0.16

3

3

3

108.61

61.34

-1.55

-4.88

The pharmacokinetic properties and drug likeness of the synthesized 1,2,4-triazole derivatives were evaluated using Swiss ADME and compared with standard antifungal drugs. Most of the derivatives followed Lipinski’s rule of Five, confirming their potential as orally active drug candidates. The molecular weight of the majority of synthesized compounds was below the threshold of 500 Da, aligning with favourable drug-likeness criteria. The topological polar surface area(TPSA) values for most derivatives were within the recommended range(<140A2),suggesting good membrane permeability. The logP values, indicative of lipophilicity, were mostly within the optimal range of -0.4 to +5.0. in terms of water solubility(LogS), the derivative demonstrated moderate to good solubility, which is advantageous for formulation and systemic bioavailability.(13)

Table 4: Predicted pharmacokinetic properties and enzyme interaction with standard antifungal drug and 1,2,4 triazole derivatives

Sr.

No

Compounds

GI absorption

BBB

Permeant

PgP

substrate

CYP1A2

CYP2C19

CYP2C9

CYP2D6

CYP3A4

1.

Fluconazole

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

2.

Isavuconazole

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

3.

Itraconazole

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

4.

Posaconazole

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

5.

Voriconazole

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

6.

Derivative 1

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

7.

Derivative 2

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

8.

Derivative 3

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

9.

Derivative 4

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

10.

Derivative 5

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

11.

Derivative 6

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

12.

Derivative 7

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

13.

Derivative 8

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

14.

Derivative 9

High

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

15.

Derivative 10

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

16.

Derivative 11

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

17.

Derivative 12

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

18.

Derivative 13

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

19.

Derivative 14

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

20.

Derivative 15

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

21.

Derivative 16

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

22.

Derivative 17

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

23.

Derivative 18

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

24.

Derivative 19

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

25.

Derivative 20

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

26.

Derivative 21

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

27.

Derivative 22

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

28.

Derivative 23

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

29.

Derivative 24

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

30.

Derivative 25

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

31.

Derivative 26

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

32.

Derivative 27

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

33.

Derivative 28

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

34.

Derivative 29

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

35.

Derivative 30

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

36.

Derivative 31

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

37.

Derivative 32

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

38.

Derivative 33

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

39.

Derivative 34

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

40.

Derivative 35

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

41.

Derivative 36

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

42.

Derivative 37

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

43.

Derivative 38

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

44.

Derivative 39

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

45.

Derivative 40

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

46.

Derivative 41

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

47.

Derivative 42

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

48.

Derivative 43

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

49.

Derivative 44

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

50.

Derivative 45

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

51.

Derivative 46

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

52.

Derivative 47

High

No

No

Yes

yes

Yes

No

No

53.

Derivative 48

High

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

54.

Derivative 49

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

55.

Derivative 50

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

56.

Derivative 51

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

57.

Derivative 52

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

58.

Derivative 53

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

59.

Derivative 54

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

60.

Derivative 55

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

61.

Derivative 56

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

62.

Derivative 57

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

63.

Derivative 58

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

64.

Derivative 59

High

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

65.

Derivative 60

High

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Table 5: Predicted toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters of standard and synthesized 1,2,4-triazole derivative

Sr. No

Compounds

Predicted

LD50           mg/kg

Predicted toxicity

class

Hepato

toxicity

Carcino

genicity

Immuno

Toxicity

Mutagenicity

Cytotoxicity

5.

Fluconazole

1271

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

6.

Isavuconazole

1000

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

7.

Itraconazole

320

4

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

8.

Posaconazole

320

4

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

9.

voriconazole

352

4

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

10.

Derivative 1

1000

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

11.

Derivative 2

600

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

12.

Derivative 3

1000

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

13.

Derivative 4

1000

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

14.

Derivative 5

1000

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

15.

Derivative 6

750

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

16.

Derivative 7

440

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

17.

Derivative 8

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

18.

Derivative 9

1190

4

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

19.

Derivative 10

500

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

20.

Derivative 11

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

21.

Derivative 12

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

22.

Derivative 13

440

4

Active

Active

Active

Active

Active

23.

Derivative 14

680

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

24.

Derivative 15

2000

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

25.

Derivative 16

1000

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

26.

Derivative 17

1760

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

27.

Derivative 18

1000

4

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

28.

Derivative 19

1760

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

29.

Derivative 20

1760

4

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

30.

Derivative 21

1760

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

31.

Derivative 22

680

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

32.

Derivative 23

750

4

Inactive

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

33.

Derivative 24

440

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

34.

Derivative 25

440

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

35.

Derivative 26

500

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

36.

Derivative 27

500

4

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

37.

Derivative 28

440

4

Inactive

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

38.

Derivative 29

680

4

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Active

Inactive

39.

Derivative 30

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

40.

Derivative 31

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

41.

Derivative 32

500

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

42.

Derivative 33

680

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

43.

Derivative 34

650

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

44.

Derivative 35

680

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

45.

Derivative 36

500

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

46.

Derivative 37

680

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

47.

Derivative 38

680

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

48.

Derivative 39

680

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

49.

Derivative 40

680

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

50.

Derivative 41

680

4

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

51.

Derivative 42

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

52.

Derivative 43

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

53.

Derivative 44

500

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

54.

Derivative 45

680

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

55.

Derivative 46

1000

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

56.

Derivative 47

680

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

57.

Derivative 48

680

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

58.

Derivative 49

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

59.

Derivative 50

500

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

60.

Derivative 51

750

4

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

61.

Derivative 52

680

4

Active

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

62

Derivative 53

680

4

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

63.

Derivative 54

680

4

Active

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

64.

Derivative 55

680

4

Active

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

65.

Derivative 56

680

4

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

66.

Derivative 57

680

4

Active

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

67.

Derivative 58

650

4

Active

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Active

68.

Derivative 59

500

4

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

69.

Derivative 60

680

4

Inactive

Active

Inactive

Inactive

Inactive

 

The toxicity and enzyme interaction profiles of the synthesized 1,2,4-triazole derivatives were evaluated using Protox III software. Most compounds exhibited low predicted toxicity, with no signs of mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, cytotoxicity or immunotoxicity. Hepatotoxicity was predicted for a few compounds, but the majority were found to be safe. Additionally, most derivative did not inhibit major cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4)  indicating low risk for drug-drug interaction. These finding support the favourable safety and metabolic stability of the synthesized derivatives for further drug development.

Figure 3: image of ligand interaction with 3JUV  and 5FRB protein

CONCLUSION

The present review highlights the synthesis and evaluation of novel 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as potential antifungal agents. Insilico analyses, including molecular docking and ADMET predictions, revealed that several synthesized compounds exhibited strong binding affinities toward fungal target proteins, along with favourable pharmacokinetic and drug-likeness profiles. Most derivatives complied with Lipinski’ rule and showed good oral bioavailability, moderate solubility, and minimal toxicity risks. Predicted toxicity studies further confirmed that the compounds are largely non-carcinogenic, non-mutagenic and safe in terms of hepatotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Enzymes interaction data showed minimal inhibition cytochrome P450 enzymes, reducing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Overall, the synthesized 1,2,4-triazoles derivatives show significant potential for further development as effective and safe antifungal agents.

REFERENCES

  1. Subhasis Banerjee, Swastika Ganguly, Kalyan Kumar Kan. A Review on 1,2,4 –Triazoles. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research.2013; Vol 3(3).
  2. James M. Ritter, Rod Flower, Graeme Henderson, Yoon Knog Loke, David Macewan, Humphrey P. Rang. Rang and dale’s Pharmacology. Ninth edition.
  3. Joel G Hardman, Lee E Limbird, Alfred Goodman Gilman.  Text book of “the pharmacological basis of therapeutics”.
  4. Frank C. Odds, Alistair J.P. Brown and Neil A.R. Gow. Antifungal agents: mechanisms of action. ELSVIER, TRENDS In Microbiology. 2003 june;Vol.11.
  5. R.R. Gupta, M. Kumar, V. Gupta. Text book of “Heterocyclic chemistry” five-membered heterocycles. 
  6. Nutan Prakash Vishwakarma. Drug Discovery. Research gate journal of antivirals and antiretrovirals. 2010 January.
  7. Yiqun Chang, Bryson A. Hawkins, Jonathan J. Du, Paul W. Groundwater. A guide to In Silico Drug Design. MDPI Journal Pharmaceutics 2023; 15, (49).
  8. Antoine Daina, Olivier Michelin and Vincent Zoete. Swiss ADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetic, drug likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific reports. 2017 March.
  9. Mohammed M. Matin, Priyanka Matin, Md. Rezaur Rahman, Taibi Ben Hadda, Faisal Almalki, Shafi Mahmud, Mohammed M. Ghoneim, Maha Alruwaily and Sultan Alshehri. Triazole and their derivatives-Synthesis, Chemistry and therapeutic Applications. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2009; (44).
  10. Azeem Shakeel, Ataf Ali Altal, Ashfaq Mahmood Qureshi, Amin Badshah. Thiourea Derivatives in Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry: A short Review. Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry 2016.
  11. Natallia Strushkevich, Segey A. Usanov and Hee-Won Park. Structural Basis of Human CYP51 inhibition by Antifungal Azoles. ScienceDirect JMB ;397, 1067-1078.
  12. Kiran Kumar Reddy G, Alwar Ramanujam Padmavathi, Y.V. Nancharaia. Fungal infections: Pathogenesis, Antifungals and alternate treatment approaches. Elsevier, Current research in Microbial Science. 2020(3).
  13. Mahammad Shafiei, Hossein Toreyhi, Loghman Firoozpour. Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro and In vivo Evaluation of Novel Fluconazole-based Compounds with promising Antifungal Activities. ACS OMEGA Publications 2016;6, 24981-25001.

Reference

  1. Subhasis Banerjee, Swastika Ganguly, Kalyan Kumar Kan. A Review on 1,2,4 –Triazoles. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research.2013; Vol 3(3).
  2. James M. Ritter, Rod Flower, Graeme Henderson, Yoon Knog Loke, David Macewan, Humphrey P. Rang. Rang and dale’s Pharmacology. Ninth edition.
  3. Joel G Hardman, Lee E Limbird, Alfred Goodman Gilman.  Text book of “the pharmacological basis of therapeutics”.
  4. Frank C. Odds, Alistair J.P. Brown and Neil A.R. Gow. Antifungal agents: mechanisms of action. ELSVIER, TRENDS In Microbiology. 2003 june;Vol.11.
  5. R.R. Gupta, M. Kumar, V. Gupta. Text book of “Heterocyclic chemistry” five-membered heterocycles. 
  6. Nutan Prakash Vishwakarma. Drug Discovery. Research gate journal of antivirals and antiretrovirals. 2010 January.
  7. Yiqun Chang, Bryson A. Hawkins, Jonathan J. Du, Paul W. Groundwater. A guide to In Silico Drug Design. MDPI Journal Pharmaceutics 2023; 15, (49).
  8. Antoine Daina, Olivier Michelin and Vincent Zoete. Swiss ADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetic, drug likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific reports. 2017 March.
  9. Mohammed M. Matin, Priyanka Matin, Md. Rezaur Rahman, Taibi Ben Hadda, Faisal Almalki, Shafi Mahmud, Mohammed M. Ghoneim, Maha Alruwaily and Sultan Alshehri. Triazole and their derivatives-Synthesis, Chemistry and therapeutic Applications. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2009; (44).
  10. Azeem Shakeel, Ataf Ali Altal, Ashfaq Mahmood Qureshi, Amin Badshah. Thiourea Derivatives in Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry: A short Review. Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry 2016.
  11. Natallia Strushkevich, Segey A. Usanov and Hee-Won Park. Structural Basis of Human CYP51 inhibition by Antifungal Azoles. ScienceDirect JMB ;397, 1067-1078.
  12. Kiran Kumar Reddy G, Alwar Ramanujam Padmavathi, Y.V. Nancharaia. Fungal infections: Pathogenesis, Antifungals and alternate treatment approaches. Elsevier, Current research in Microbial Science. 2020(3).
  13. Mahammad Shafiei, Hossein Toreyhi, Loghman Firoozpour. Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro and In vivo Evaluation of Novel Fluconazole-based Compounds with promising Antifungal Activities. ACS OMEGA Publications 2016;6, 24981-25001.

Photo
Sowmiya L
Corresponding author

PG Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai 603319

Photo
Dr. D. Nagavalli
Co-author

MPHARM, Ph.D, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai 603319

Sowmiya L, Dr. D. Nagavalli, 1,2,4-Triazole Derivatives Targeting Fungal 14-Alpha Demethylase Enzyme: An Insilico Approach, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 8, 1471-1489. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16856764

More related articles
Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation And In-Si...
Aswini Sasidharan, Baskar Lakshmanan, R. Sudharsan , ...
The Importance of Clinical Trials in New Drug Desi...
Prashant Singar, Apurva Torane , Mayur Paithankar, Anuja Jadhav,...
Comparative Anthelmintic Potential Study of Aqueou...
Khomendra Sarwa, Manisha Chandrakar, Gaurav Kashyap, Rahul Singh,...
A Polyherbal Formulation of Tea Infusion Bag by Using Indian Insulin and Oyster ...
Laxmi Watane , Kanchan Wagh, Prachi Murkute, Ashwini Pundkar, Dr. Santosh Payghan, ...
Synthesis, Characterisation, Biological Evaluation and Analogizing the Antimycot...
Ramanathan N., Nivetha B., Praveen Kumar K. C., Ragul E., Ragul Gandhi P., Raj Kumar N., ...
Pharmacognosy Of Essntial Oils: Recent Advances in Extraction and Therapeutic Ap...
Rahul Dubey, Vijendra Baghel, Samriddhi Gidion, Vasant Harjpal, ...
Related Articles
A Research On Design And Evaluation Of Alovera Body Lotion ...
Damini Anil Mundhare , Disha prakash wankhede , Laxmi Deshmukh, Nandakishor Deshmukh, Dr. Swati Desh...
Revolutionizing Wound Care with Chitosan-Based Biomaterials...
Vinu Gopakumar Krishna, Neha Joshy, Prasanth M. S., ...
Formulation and Evolution of Polyherbal Shampoo...
Vaishali Bhavale, Aarti Dangode, Priya Jaware, Dr. Santosh Payghan, ...
Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation And In-Silico Studies Of Nitrogen Conta...
Aswini Sasidharan, Baskar Lakshmanan, R. Sudharsan , ...
More related articles
Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation And In-Silico Studies Of Nitrogen Conta...
Aswini Sasidharan, Baskar Lakshmanan, R. Sudharsan , ...
The Importance of Clinical Trials in New Drug Design ...
Prashant Singar, Apurva Torane , Mayur Paithankar, Anuja Jadhav, Sakshi Shahane, ...
Comparative Anthelmintic Potential Study of Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of Le...
Khomendra Sarwa, Manisha Chandrakar, Gaurav Kashyap, Rahul Singh, Vijendra Kumar Suryawanshi, Varsha...
Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation And In-Silico Studies Of Nitrogen Conta...
Aswini Sasidharan, Baskar Lakshmanan, R. Sudharsan , ...
The Importance of Clinical Trials in New Drug Design ...
Prashant Singar, Apurva Torane , Mayur Paithankar, Anuja Jadhav, Sakshi Shahane, ...
Comparative Anthelmintic Potential Study of Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of Le...
Khomendra Sarwa, Manisha Chandrakar, Gaurav Kashyap, Rahul Singh, Vijendra Kumar Suryawanshi, Varsha...