View Article

Abstract

Poor aqueous solubility and low bioavailability of Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Class II drugs present significant formulation challenges. Nanoemulsion-based buccal films offer a promising platform to overcome these limitations by combining the advantages of lipid nanocarriers and mucoadhesive delivery systems. This review summarizes current research on nanoemulsion (NE)-loaded buccal films, highlighting formulation strategies, characterization techniques, mechanisms of absorption, and their role in improving the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Emphasis is placed on formulation components, physicochemical evaluation, and recent advances in nanocarrier-film integration for effective transmucosal drug delivery.

Keywords

Nanoemulsion, Buccal films, BCS Class II drugs, Mucoadhesive delivery, Bioavailability enhancement

Introduction

The oral route remains the most convenient and widely accepted method for drug administration. However, drugs belonging to BCS Class II exhibit poor aqueous solubility and variable absorption, leading to low and inconsistent bioavailability. Conventional oral formulations often fail to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations due to pre-systemic metabolism and enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract.

The buccal mucosa, with its rich blood supply and permeability, offers an alternative route that bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism. When combined with nanoemulsion (NE) technology, which enhances solubilization and diffusion of lipophilic drugs, nanoemulsion-loaded buccal films represent a novel approach for controlled and efficient drug delivery.

2. NANOEMULSIONS: AN OVERVIEW

Nanoemulsions are thermodynamically unstable but kinetically stable systems consisting of oil, water, surfactant, and co-surfactant with droplet sizes typically between 20–200 nm. The small droplet size provides:

  • High surface area for drug dissolution,
  • Improved solubilization of lipophilic compounds, and
  • Enhanced mucosal permeation.

2.1 Components of Nanoemulsions

  • Oil phase: solubilizes the lipophilic drug (e.g., Capryol 90, Labrafac).
  • Surfactant: reduces interfacial tension (e.g., Tween 80, Cremophor EL).
  • Co-surfactant: stabilizes the interface (e.g., Transcutol P, PEG 400).
  • Aqueous phase: provides dispersion medium.

2.2 Preparation Methods

Common methods include:

  • High-pressure homogenization
  • Ultrasonication
  • Spontaneous emulsification

These techniques ensure uniform droplet distribution and enhanced stability.

3. BUCCAL FILMS: CHARACTERISTICS AND ADVANTAGES

Buccal films are flexible, thin polymeric matrices that adhere to the mucosa and release the drug either locally or systemically. They are prepared using mucoadhesive polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), sodium alginate, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and carbopol.

3.1 Advantages

  • Bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism
  • Rapid onset of action
  • Improved patient compliance
  • Possibility of controlled or sustained release
  • Ease of removal and administration

3.2 Evaluation Parameters

Films are evaluated for:

  • Thickness and weight uniformity
  • Folding endurance
  • Surface pH
  • Tensile strength
  • Drug content and in-vitro release
  • Ex-vivo mucoadhesion and permeation studies

4. INTEGRATION OF NANOEMULSIONS INTO BUCCAL FILMS

Loading nanoemulsions into buccal films combines solubilization power with mucoadhesive retention. The integration process involves:

  1. Preparation of optimized nanoemulsion using pseudo-ternary phase diagram.
  2. Incorporation into polymeric film-forming solution.
  3. Casting and drying to form uniform buccal films.

This hybrid delivery system ensures sustained drug release and improved mucosal permeation due to the nanodroplet size and lipidic composition.

5. MECHANISM OF DRUG ABSORPTION

Upon administration, the film adheres to the mucosal surface and gradually hydrates, releasing the nanoemulsion droplets. The nano-sized droplets enhance drug diffusion through:

  • Paracellular and transcellular pathways,
  • Interaction with mucosal lipids, and
  • Improved solubilization at the absorption site.

This results in higher permeation flux and bioavailability compared to conventional buccal films or oral formulations.

6. APPLICATIONS FOR BCS CLASS II DRUGS

Nanoemulsion-loaded buccal films have been explored for several poorly soluble drugs:

Drug

Type

Key Outcome

Atorvastatin calcium

BCS II

↑ solubility and hypolipidemic effect

Valsartan

BCS II

Enhanced permeability and bioavailability

Ibuprofen

BCS II

Rapid onset with reduced GI irritation

Ketoconazole

BCS II

Improved dissolution rate

7. EVALUATION PARAMETERS

  • Physicochemical Evaluation: droplet size (DLS), zeta potential, PDI, viscosity, pH, and drug content.
  • In-vitro release studies: conducted using simulated saliva or phosphate buffer (pH 6.8).
  • Ex-vivo permeation: performed on porcine or goat buccal mucosa.
  • Stability studies: assess phase separation, drug precipitation, and film integrity over time.

8. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

While promising, challenges remain:

  • Long-term stability of nanoemulsions within polymeric films.
  • Scale-up and industrial reproducibility.
  • Limited in-vivo and clinical studies.
    Future advancements may focus on smart polymers, thermo-responsive films, and bioadhesive nanocarriers with targeted release mechanisms.

9. CONCLUSION

Nanoemulsion-loaded buccal films represent a synergistic strategy for enhancing the bioavailability of BCS Class II drugs. Their ability to combine the solubilization efficiency of nanoemulsions with the mucosal retention of buccal films makes them a robust platform for patient-friendly, effective, and controlled drug delivery. Further in-vivo and clinical research is essential to translate these systems from laboratory to market.

REFERENCES

  1. Gavin A, et al. Layered nanoemulsions as mucoadhesive buccal systems: formulation and ex-vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2015. (PMC)
  2. Shipp L, et al. Buccal films: a review of therapeutic opportunities, formulations and relevant evaluation approaches. Int J Pharm. 2022. (sciencedirect.com)
  3. Jacob S, et al. Innovations in nanoemulsion technology: enhancing drug solubility and bioavailability. Pharmaceutics. 2024. (PMC)
  4. Weerapol Y, et al. Nanoemulsion-based orodispersible film formulation: development and evaluation. Pharmaceutics. 2023. (PMC).
  5. Alkilani AZ, et al. Nanoemulsion-based film formulation for transdermal delivery of poorly soluble drugs. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018. (sciencedirect.com)
  6. Abu-Huwaij RT, et al. Development and in-vitro characterization of mucoadhesive buccal patches of valsartan in nanoemulsion form. 2019. (bibliotekanauki.pl)
  7. Soliman MM, et al. Nanoemulsion-based buccal films of atorvastatin calcium: formulation and evaluation. ZJPS. 2021. (zjps.journals.ekb.eg)
  8. Tzanova MM, et al. Solid lipid nanoparticle-loaded mucoadhesive buccal films: formulation and evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2021. (sciencedirect.com)

Reference

  1. Gavin A, et al. Layered nanoemulsions as mucoadhesive buccal systems: formulation and ex-vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2015. (PMC)
  2. Shipp L, et al. Buccal films: a review of therapeutic opportunities, formulations and relevant evaluation approaches. Int J Pharm. 2022. (sciencedirect.com)
  3. Jacob S, et al. Innovations in nanoemulsion technology: enhancing drug solubility and bioavailability. Pharmaceutics. 2024. (PMC)
  4. Weerapol Y, et al. Nanoemulsion-based orodispersible film formulation: development and evaluation. Pharmaceutics. 2023. (PMC).
  5. Alkilani AZ, et al. Nanoemulsion-based film formulation for transdermal delivery of poorly soluble drugs. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018. (sciencedirect.com)
  6. Abu-Huwaij RT, et al. Development and in-vitro characterization of mucoadhesive buccal patches of valsartan in nanoemulsion form. 2019. (bibliotekanauki.pl)
  7. Soliman MM, et al. Nanoemulsion-based buccal films of atorvastatin calcium: formulation and evaluation. ZJPS. 2021. (zjps.journals.ekb.eg)
  8. Tzanova MM, et al. Solid lipid nanoparticle-loaded mucoadhesive buccal films: formulation and evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2021. (sciencedirect.com)

Photo
Drashti Patel
Corresponding author

Sharda School of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Photo
Dhwanit Darji
Co-author

Sharda School of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Photo
Jay Maske
Co-author

Sharda School of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Photo
Rakesh Melaja
Co-author

Sharda School of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Photo
Jaini Patel
Co-author

Sharda School of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Drashti Patel, Dhwanit Darji, Jay Maske, Rakesh Melaja, Jaini Patel, NanoEmulsion-Infused Buccal Films: A Hybrid Drug Delivery Platform for Overcoming Solubility Barriers in BCS Class II Drugs , Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 11, 1692-1696. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17581340

More related articles
Development, Optimization and Characterization of ...
B. Hariprassath, Dr. K. Karthick, ...
Storage-Related Variations in Buccal Swab DNA Inte...
Madhu Kalasad, Aboli Dagamwar, Pratiksha Patil, Damini Patil, Ruc...
Formulation And Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Buccal ...
Arunkumar V., Senthil Kumar K. L., ...
Related Articles
Comprehensive Review on Advancements in Buccal Drug Delivery...
Dr. Vishal Rasve, Achal Ghate, Mozes Durgawad, Dr. Amit Ingle, Shraddha Lunge, Ankita Jatale, Pallav...
Extraction and Formulation of Buccal Film Using Jackfruit Seed Starch...
Sujatha, Sahana B R, Roshini P, Reshma, Sakshi R, Rakshitha M, ...
Review on Buccal Drug Delivery System...
Nandini Gire, G. K Bramha, ...
More related articles
Storage-Related Variations in Buccal Swab DNA Integrity Over Two Weeks: Forensic...
Madhu Kalasad, Aboli Dagamwar, Pratiksha Patil, Damini Patil, Ruchi Bhuran, Mahesh Thange, ...