View Article

  • Formulation Development and Analytical Method Development of Dapsone and Ethoxzolamide Bilayer Tablet Used in Treatment of Severe Burn Dissertation

  • 1, 2 Madhav University, Pindwara, Sirohi, Rajasthan, 307026

    3 Matoshri Institute of Pharmacy, Dhanore, Yeola, Nashik

    4 Ashok College of Pharmacy, Shrirampur.

    5 Loknete Shri Dadapatil Pharate College of Pharmacy, Mandavgan Pharata, Shirur, Pune.

Abstract

The present study focuses on the formulation and analytical method development of bilayer tablets comprising Dapsone and Ethoxzolamide, intended for the effective treatment of severe burn conditions. Dapsone, an antibacterial agent, was formulated as an immediate release layer, while Ethoxzolamide, a diuretic and anti-inflammatory agent, was designed as a sustained release layer. The bilayer tablets were developed using direct compression technique, and various formulations were optimized based on excipient concentration and physical parameters. Pre-compression studies of powder blends revealed excellent flow properties. The prepared tablets were evaluated for weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, drug content, and in vitro drug release. Analytical evaluations using UV spectroscopy, FTIR, and DSC confirmed drug identity and compatibility with excipients. The in vitro dissolution studies demonstrated desirable release profiles: Dapsone followed an immediate release pattern, and Ethoxzolamide showed a sustained release behavior. Drug release kinetics indicated that the matrix model best fit the release data. The study successfully developed a bilayer tablet system that ensures sequential drug delivery for enhanced therapeutic efficacy in burn treatment.

Keywords

Bilayer tablet, Dapsone, Ethoxzolamide, Severe burn, Immediate release, Sustained release, Direct compression, Drug release kinetics, Matrix model, UV spectroscopy, FTIR, DSC

Introduction

Bi-layered tablets:

Bi-layer tablets require fewer materials than compression-coated tablets and may be thinner. For unique tablet identity, colouring the separate layers provides many possibilities. Currently, several pharmaceutical companies are preparing bilayer tablets for a variety of reasons, viz. patent extension, therapeutic, and marketing, to name a few. There are various problems associated with the formulation of bilayer tablets, such as layer separation, insufficient hardness, inaccurate individual layer weight control, cross contamination between the layers, reduced yield, etc.

Types of Bilayer tablets:

A. Homogeneous type

Bilayer tablets are preferred when the release profiles of the drugs are different from one another. These are prepared with one layer being immediate release and the other layer being designed to give a second dose or controlled release.

Fig.1.Bilayer tablets (some drug with different-different release pattern-Homogeneous

B. Heterogeneous type

The bilayer tablet is suitable for the sequential release of two drugs in combination, separating two incompatible substances

Fig. 2. Bilayer tablet (with two drug-Heterogeneous)

Need of developing bilayer tablets

For the supervision of fixed dose combinations of drugs, prolonging the drug product life cycle, buccal/mucoadhesive drug delivery systems, develop novel drug delivery systems such as chewing devices and floating tablets for gastro-retentive drug delivery systems.

  1. To control the delivery rate of either a single or two different APIs.
  2. To adapt the total surface area available for the API layer, either by sandwiching with one or two inactive layers in order to achieve swellable/erodible barriers for controlled release.
  3. To isolate incompatible APIs and control the release of one layer by using the functional properties of the other layer.

Advantages

  1. It has the greatest chemical and microbial stability as compared to other oral dosage forms.
  2. Provide the most precision with the least amount of content uniformity.
  3. Suitable for mass production.

Disadvantages

  1. It adds complexity, and also, bi-layer rotary presses are expensive.
  2. It has insufficient hardness, layer separation, and reduced yield.
  3. There may be cross contamination between the layers.

Applications

  1. They are suitable for the sequential release of two drugs in combination.
  2. It is improved technology that overcomes the single-layered tablet's shortcoming.
  3. They are used to deliver the loading dose and a sustained dose of the same or different drugs.

Quality and GMP requirements

For the manufacturing of a good quality bi-layer tablet according to GMP guidelines, it is important that the selected press be capable of the following:

  1. Capping and de-lamination should be avoided.
  2. Sufficient tablet hardness should be maintained.
  3. Keep the two layers from becoming contaminated with each other.

Compression Cycle for Bilayer Tablet

The bi-layer tablet is made by compressing two different granulations fed into a die in succession. One on top of another in layers. Individual layers come from a separate feed frame with individual weight control. The rotary tablet press is set up for two or three layers.

Fig. 3. Compaction process of Bi-layered tablet

Literature Review:

  • Patel et al. (2010) studied challenges in the formulation of bi-layered tablets. This article explains why the development and production of quality bi-layer tablets needs to be carried out on purpose-built tablet presses to overcome common bi-layer problems, such as layer-separation, insufficient hardness, inaccurate individual layer weight control, cross-contamination between the layers, reduced yield, etc. Using a modified tablet press may therefore not be your best approach in producing a quality bi-layer tablet under GMP-conditions
  • Anupam Sarma et al. (April 2013) this article explains why the development and production of quality bi-layer tablets needs to be carried out on purpose-built tablet presses to overcome common bi-layer problems, such as layer-separation, insufficient hardness, inaccurate individual layer weight control, cross-contamination between the layers, reduced yield, etc. Using a modified tablet press may therefore not be your best approach to producing a quality bi-layer tablet under GMP-conditions. Especially when in addition high production output is required
  • Sowmya et. Al (2012) This article explains about the novel approach of oral drug delivery system. Bi-layer tablet is a new era for the successful development of controlled release formulation along with various features to provide a way of successful drug delivery system. Bi-layer tablet is suitable for sequential release of two drugs in combination, separate two incompatible substances and also for sustained release tablet in which one layer is immediate release as initial dose and second layer is maintenance dose. Bi-layer tablets has been developed to achieve controlled delivery of different drugs with predefined release profiles.
  • Gill P et al. reported "Differential Scanning Calorimetry Techniques: Applications in Biology and Nanoscience" Thermoanalytical parameters of biomolecules and nanomaterials may be obtained using DSC, which is a strong method. Furthermore, recent advancements have enabled the evaluation of the purification yield of various pharmaceutical medicines, such as antibodies.
  • Prasanna Kumar Desu et al. reviewed different techniques for bilayer tablet. Bi-layer tablet quality and GMP-requirements can vary widely. This explains why many different types of presses are being used to produce bi-layer tablets, ranging from simple single-sided presses to highly sophisticated machines. Whenever high quality bi-layer tablets need to be produced at high speed, the use of an 'air compensator' in combination with displacement control appears to be the best solution. The present study shows that quality and GMP requirements can vary widely for bilayer tablets. This explains why many different types of presses are being used to produce bi-layer tablets, ranging from simple single-sided presses to highly sophisticated machines such as the Courtoy-R-292F.

Drug Profile

Table 1. Drug Profile of Dapsone

Particulars

Description

Name

Dapsone

Category

Anti-biotic

CAS registry number

80-08-0

Chemical Structure

 

 

Chemical Formula

C12H12N2O2S

IUPAC name

4-[(4-aminobenzene)sulfonyl]aniline

Molecular weight

248.30 g/mol

Appearance, Colour

White Crystalline powder, Odourless, Slightly bitter taste.

Melting Point

175-176 °C

Solubility

Practically insoluble in water

BCS Class

Class II

Storage

Store at room temperature between 20°C-25°C away from light and moisture.

PKa

2.41

Dose

50 to 100 milligrams (mg) once a day; or 1.4 mg per kilogram (kg) (0.6 mg per pound) of body weight once a day.

Half Life

The elimination half-life of dapsone is about 30 hours.

Protien Binding

About 70 to 90% protein bound

Log P

0.97

l max

290 nm

Ph

5.5-7.0

Cmax

0.63-4.82 mg/L

Adverse effect

Hemolysis, Toxic hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice, Other adverse effects include nausea, headache, and rash (which are common), and insomnia, psychosis, and peripheral neuropathy.

Table 2. Drug Profile of Ethoxzolamide

Particulars

Description

Name

Ethoxzolamide

Category

Diuretic agent

CAS registry number

452-35-7

Chemical Structure

 

 

Chemical Formula

CH10N2O3S2

IUPAC name

6-ethoxy-1,3-benzothiazole-2-sulfonamide

Molecular weight

222.24 g/mol

Appearance, Colour

White to faintly yellowish-white, odorless crystalline powder

Melting Point

188-190.5 °C

Solubility

Slightly soluble in alcohol, acetone, chloroform & ether, practically insoluble in water

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

Formulation of Bilayer tablet containing Dapsone and Ethoxzolamide

Following formulations of Dapsone and Ethoxzolamide Bilayer tablets were used for developmental work.

Table 3 Composition of Immediate release tablet containing Dapsone (D1-D4)

Ingredients/ Batch

Dapsone

Ac-Di-Sol

Avicel pH102

Talc

Magnesium stearate

Sodium saccharin

D1

50

50

88

8

2

2

D2

50

40

98

8

2

2

D3

50

30

108

8

2

2

D4

50

20

118

8

2

2

Table 4 Composition of Sustained release tablet containing Ethoxzolamide (A1-A4)

Ingredients/ Batch

Ethoxzolamide

E4M polymer

Avicel pH102

Talc

Magnesium stearate

Sodium saccharin

D1

250

50

38

8

2

2

D2

250

40

48

8

2

2

D3

250

30

58

8

2

2

D4

250

20

68

8

2

2

Preparation of bilayer tablet:

The bilayer tablets were prepared using the direct compression method. The sustained release layer was poured first into the die cavity, followed by the immediate release layer, which was poured and compressed into the tablets using a 12 station tablet compression machine (Rimek, Mini Press-II MT. Karnavati Engineering Ltd., 12 station) with an average hardness of 4.0-6.0 kg/cm². (Monsanto hardness tester)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Drug Authentication:

Organoleptic properties:

Table.5. Comparison of Organoleptic Properties of Dapsone with the Reported Standards

Identification Test

Observation

Standard as per IP

Appearance

Almost White Crystalline Powder

A white or almost white powder

Colour

White

A white Crystalline powder

Odour

Odourless

Odourless

Table. 6 Comparison of Organoleptic Properties of Ethoxzolamide with the Reported standards

Identification Test

Observation

Standard as per IP

Appearance

White powder

White powder

Colour

White

White powder

Odour

Odourless

Odourless

FTIR Study

Figure 4 IR Spectra of Dapsone

Figure. 5.IR Spectra of Ethoxzolamide

DSC Study

Figure.6. DSC graph of pure Dapsone

Figure.7 DSC graph of pure Ethoxzolamide

UV-Visible spectroscopy

Fig.8 Calibration curve of Dapsone

Fig. 8.Calibration curve of Ethoxzolamide

Drug-excipient compatibility study

DSC Study

The DSC thermogram for Dapsone in combination with various excipients shows the peak onset temperature (Tonset) [176.86°C]. The thermogram of Dapsone showed a sharp endothermic peak at 180°C. In this thermogram, the melting endotherm of Dapsone (T onset and T peak) was well preserved, with light broadening shifting towards the lower temperature range.

Fig.9.: DSC graph for Dapsone with excipients

Fig.10: DSC graph for Ethoxzolamide with excipients

Evaluation of prepared tablet blends for pre compression study:

The characterization of mixed blend was done for determination of mass-volume relationship parameters. The evaluated parameters are angle of repose, bulk density, tapper density; Hauser's ratio and compressibility index were reported in Table for Dapsone as the immediate release layer and for Ethoxzolamide as the sustained release layer.

Table. 7.Evaluation of Powder Blend Dapsone (DP1-DP4)

Formulation code

Angle of Repose(0)

Bulk Density (gm/ml)

Tapped Density (gm/ml)

Carr's Compressibility Index (%)

Hausner's ratio

DP1

27.12±0.5

0.40±0.02

0.42±0.12

4.76

1.05

DP2

28.05±0.1

0.40±0.08

0.42±1.02

4.76

1.05

DP3

27.14±0.5

0.40±1.02

0.42±0.08

4.76

1.05

DP4

28.06±0.8

0.41±0.15

0.42±0.09

2.38

1.02

±S.D. (n=3)

Table 8. Evaluation of Powder Blend Ethoxzolamide (A1-A4)

Formulation code

Angle of Repose(0)

Bulk Density (gm/ml)

Tapped Density (gm/ml)

Carr's Compressibility Index (%)

Hausner's ratio

E1

26.76±0.7

0.53±0.04

0.55±0.011

3.63

1.03

E2

28.71±0.3

0.53±0.008

0.55±0.052

3.63

1.03

E3

28.61±0.8

0.53±0.007

0.55±0.12

3.63

1.03

E4

29.51±0.2

0.53±0.006

0.55±0.075

3.63

1.03

Angle of Repose:

Tables indicates the results obtained for angle of repose of all the formulations. All formulations showed the angle of repose within 30°. It indicates that all formulations showed excellent flow properties. From the results of pre- compression studies of the batches DP1-DP4 and E1-E4, it is concluded that a powder mixture has good flow properties and compressibility properties.

Evaluation of Tablets:

All batches (DE1-DE4) were subjected for weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, drug content, in vitro disintegration time, and kinetic studies were carried out. All the formulations were passed the parameter which was reported in Table.

Table.9. Evaluation of bilayer tablets

Form. Code

Weight variation (gm)

Thickness (cm)

Hardness (Kg/cm²)

Friability (%)

Assay (%)

Dapson

Ethoxzolamide

DE1

0.523

0.55±0.14

5.7

0.7

5

98.56

98.63

DE2

0.520

0.55±0.75

5.6

0.5

8

98.12

99.25

DE3

0.514

0.55±0.85

5.5

0.5

7

99.23

101.04

DE4

0.535

0.55±0.12

5.5

0.5

3

99.78

99.45

Drug Content:

The formulated tablets, batches DP1-DP4, were tested for assay by UV spectroscopy. Dapsone absorbance in methanol is measured at 296nm (max). The assay was found to be in the range of 98.12% to 99.78%, which is within the standard record limit. The formulated tablets, batches E1-E4, were tested for assay by UV spectroscopy. Ethoxzolamide absorbance in methanol is measured at 299nm (2max). The assay was found to be in the range of 98.63% to 101.04%, which is within the standard record limit.

Figure. 11. Cumulative percentage of drug released of formulations (DPI-DP4)

Figure. 12. Cumulative percentage of drug released of formulations (E1-E4)

Kinetic analysis of In-vitro Drug Release Study

Table.10. Kinetics of drug release profile for Dapsone (DP1-DP4)

Results

Zero order model

29

First order model

41

Matrix model

229

Hix. Crow. Model

36

Sr. No.

Time (min)

1

0

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

2

5

6.186

7.869

0.780

7.254

3

10

7.725

11.134

0.848

9.877

4

15

6.378

10.535

0.980

8.987

5

20

2.861

6.252

0.812

4.951

6

25

0.013

0.885

0.749

0.439

7

30

5.596

2.542

0.819

3.430

8

45

0.701

0.396

0.974

0.492

9

60

0.011

1.047

0.920

0.565

Table.11. Kinetics of drug release profile for Ethoxzolamide (E1-E4)

Results

Zero order model

1

First order model

1

Matrix model

7

Hix. Crow. Model

1

Sr. No.

Time (min)

1

10

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

2

15

0.011

0.011

0.830

0.011

3

30

0.001

0.000

0.848

0.001

4

60

0.063

0.054

0.835

0.057

5

120

0.199

0.171

0.704

0.180

6

240

0.113

0.082

0.595

0.091

7

480

0.509

0.563

0.860

0.544

8

600

0.069

0.072

0.978

0.071

9

720

0.237

0.276

2.980

0.263

CONCLUSION

The goal of the current study is to create bilayer tablets containing both Dapsone and Ethoxzolamide. The initial step involved gathering theoretical and technical data; the next step involved buying the necessary supplies. The ratio of the disintegrant, polymer, and other excipients for the final batches was established before carrying out the final batches by making preliminary batches with various ratios. A multistation compression machine was used to prepare the tablets utilising the direct compression technique. The tablets' physical attributes, such as thickness, hardness, friability, weight variance, and content consistency, were assessed. Utilising the U.S.P dissolution test apparatus-II, an in-vitro dissolving research was carried out using 900 ml of 0.1N HCl at 100 rpm for the immediate release layer and 900 ml of 0.01N HCI for sustained release tablets. From Therefore, it was determined that all formulations exhibit optimal drug release for a given amount of time. All formulations were subjected to drug release kinetics. Drug release kinetic studies' regression coefficients were examined, and it was discovered that the matrix model suited the data. The results of all other evaluation investigations indicated that they were all within the statutory limit range.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My heartfelt thanks to all the faculty members and staff of the Department of Pharmaceutics for their continuous cooperation and encouragement. I extend my special thanks to my colleagues and friends for their moral support and constructive discussions that helped me improve the quality of my work. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their unwavering love, patience, and support throughout this journey.

REFERENCES

  1. G. Hymavathi, J. Adilakshmi, K. Dwarathi, M. Kavya, G. Pravallika. Review Article on Inprocess Problems and Evaluation Tests of Tablet Manufacturing. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences. 2012, 3(7), 175-179.
  2. Vishwakarma A. G., Mogal R. T., Pawar A. Y. Bi-Layer Tablet - A New Ways in Oral Drug Delivery System. International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2014, 6(5)pp, 1416-1428.
  3. Shiyani B., et al. Formulation and evaluation of Bilayer tablet of Metoclopramide hydrochloride andIbuprofen. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, 2008, 9(3), 818-27.
  4. LaForce C., Gentile D. A., Skoner D. P. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group. multicenter, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of extended-release guaifenesin/ pseudoephedrine hydrochloride for symptom relief as an adjunctive therapy to antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory infections. Postgrad. Med. 2008; 120: 53-59.
  5. Maggi L., Segale L., Conti S., Ochoa Machiste E., Conte U. Preparation and evaluation of release characteristics of 3TabGum, a novel chewing device. Eur. J. Pharm Sci. 2005,4, 487-493.
  6. Park C. R, Munday D. L. Development and evaluation of a biphasic buccal adhesive tablet for nicotine replacement therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 237: 215-226.
  7. Sungthongjeen S., Sriamornsak P., Puttipipatkhachorn S. Design and evaluation of floating multi-layer coated tablets based on gas formation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 69, 255-263.
  8. Efentakis, M., Peponaki, C. Formulation study and evaluation of matrix andthree- layer tablet sustained drug delivery systems based on carbopols with isosorbite mononitrate. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008, 9, 917-923.
  9. Phaechamud, T. Variables influencing drug release from layered matrix system comprising hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2008, 9, 668-674.
  10. Kulkarni, A., Bhatia, M. Development and evaluation of bilayer floating tablets of atenolol and lovastatin for biphasic release profile. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2009, 8, 15-25.
  11. Nirmal, J., Saisivam, S., Peddanna, C., Muralidharan, S., Nagarajan, M. Bilayer tablets of atorvastatin calcium and nicotinic acid: formulation and evaluation. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56, 1455-1458.
  12. Reddy, P.T., Rao, D.V., Kumar, R. K. Bi-layer technology- an emerging trend: a review, Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. L. Sci. 2013, 2(3), 404-411.
  13. Shaikh, T. K., Gadhave, M.V., Jadhav, S.L., Gaikwad, D.D. Different techniques of bi-layer tablet: a review. Int. J. Uni. Pharm. & Life Sci. 2012, 2(2), 450-460.
  14. Jha, M. K, Rahman, H., Rahman, M. Biphasic oral solid drug delivery system: A review. Int. J. Pharm Sci. Res. 2011, 2(5), 1108-15.
  15. Moiz, Prathima SM, Sadanandam M. Formulation and evaluation of bilavered tablets of montelukast and levocetrizine dihydrochloride Using natural and synthetic polymers, Int. J. Drug Deliv, 2011, 3(4), 597-618.
  16. Kumar K.. Mahesh M., Sasikanth, K. Design, Development and Characterization of Sustained Release of Metformin & Gliclazide bi-layered Tablets. Int. J. Bio, 2010, 1(2), 67-71.
  17. Adepu, S., Ramakrishna, S. Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status and Future Directions. Molecules 2021, 26, 5905. (https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195905)
  18. Langer, R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 1998, 392, 5-10.
  19. Yie. W.Chein. Novel Drug Delivery Systems, Second Edition Vol (50);301-375
  20. Gaurav Tiwari, Ruchi Tiwari, Saurabha K Bannerjee. Drug Delivery Systems: An Update Review. Int J Pharm Investig. 2012 Jan-Mar,2(1):2-11.
  21. Mohalkar R., Poul B, Patil S. S., Shetkar M. A., Chavan D., A Review on Immediate Release Drug Delivery Systems. Pharma Tutor, 2014, 2(8), 95-109.
  22. Ubhe T. S., Gedam P. A Brief Overview on Tablet and It's Types. Journal of Advancement in Pharmacology, 2020, 1(1), 21-31.
  23. Leon Lachman, Herbert A. Lieberman, Joseph L. Kanig: The theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, Varghese publication house, 3rd edition, 1990, 293-373.
  24. Herbert A. Liberman, Martin M. Rieger and Gilbert S. Banker, pharmaceutical dosage forms: Tablets; volume-I.
  25. Danielle S.W. Benoit, Clyde T. Overby, Kenneth R. Sims Jr., Marian A. Ackun- Farmmer, 2.5.12 Drug Delivery Systems, Biomaterials Science, Fourth Edition, Academic Press, 2020, 1237-1266,ISBN 9780128161371.(https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00078-7).
  26. Kaur Harbir. Processing Technologies for Pharmaceutical Tablets: A Review. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2012, 3 (7), 20-23.
  27. Panchal H. A, Tiwari A. K. A Novel Approach of Bi-layer Tablet Technology- a review. IR.JP. 2012, 3(5), 44-49.
  28. Sowmya C., Reddy C. S., Tabasum, S.G., Varma V. An overview on bi-layer tablets. IJPT: 2012, 4 (2), 2143-2156.
  29. Deshpande R. D. Gowda D. V., Nawaz M., Maramwar, D. N. Bi-layer tablets- An emerging trend: a review. IJPSR, 2011, 2(10), 2534-2544.
  30. Panda S., Mishra B., Behera S. Bi-Layer Tablets: An Emerging State of Art Technology in Dosage Form Design. Journal of Advances in Nanotechnology and its Applications, 2021, 3(2), 1-14.

Reference

  1. G. Hymavathi, J. Adilakshmi, K. Dwarathi, M. Kavya, G. Pravallika. Review Article on Inprocess Problems and Evaluation Tests of Tablet Manufacturing. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences. 2012, 3(7), 175-179.
  2. Vishwakarma A. G., Mogal R. T., Pawar A. Y. Bi-Layer Tablet - A New Ways in Oral Drug Delivery System. International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2014, 6(5)pp, 1416-1428.
  3. Shiyani B., et al. Formulation and evaluation of Bilayer tablet of Metoclopramide hydrochloride andIbuprofen. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, 2008, 9(3), 818-27.
  4. LaForce C., Gentile D. A., Skoner D. P. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group. multicenter, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of extended-release guaifenesin/ pseudoephedrine hydrochloride for symptom relief as an adjunctive therapy to antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory infections. Postgrad. Med. 2008; 120: 53-59.
  5. Maggi L., Segale L., Conti S., Ochoa Machiste E., Conte U. Preparation and evaluation of release characteristics of 3TabGum, a novel chewing device. Eur. J. Pharm Sci. 2005,4, 487-493.
  6. Park C. R, Munday D. L. Development and evaluation of a biphasic buccal adhesive tablet for nicotine replacement therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 237: 215-226.
  7. Sungthongjeen S., Sriamornsak P., Puttipipatkhachorn S. Design and evaluation of floating multi-layer coated tablets based on gas formation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 69, 255-263.
  8. Efentakis, M., Peponaki, C. Formulation study and evaluation of matrix andthree- layer tablet sustained drug delivery systems based on carbopols with isosorbite mononitrate. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008, 9, 917-923.
  9. Phaechamud, T. Variables influencing drug release from layered matrix system comprising hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2008, 9, 668-674.
  10. Kulkarni, A., Bhatia, M. Development and evaluation of bilayer floating tablets of atenolol and lovastatin for biphasic release profile. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2009, 8, 15-25.
  11. Nirmal, J., Saisivam, S., Peddanna, C., Muralidharan, S., Nagarajan, M. Bilayer tablets of atorvastatin calcium and nicotinic acid: formulation and evaluation. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56, 1455-1458.
  12. Reddy, P.T., Rao, D.V., Kumar, R. K. Bi-layer technology- an emerging trend: a review, Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. L. Sci. 2013, 2(3), 404-411.
  13. Shaikh, T. K., Gadhave, M.V., Jadhav, S.L., Gaikwad, D.D. Different techniques of bi-layer tablet: a review. Int. J. Uni. Pharm. & Life Sci. 2012, 2(2), 450-460.
  14. Jha, M. K, Rahman, H., Rahman, M. Biphasic oral solid drug delivery system: A review. Int. J. Pharm Sci. Res. 2011, 2(5), 1108-15.
  15. Moiz, Prathima SM, Sadanandam M. Formulation and evaluation of bilavered tablets of montelukast and levocetrizine dihydrochloride Using natural and synthetic polymers, Int. J. Drug Deliv, 2011, 3(4), 597-618.
  16. Kumar K.. Mahesh M., Sasikanth, K. Design, Development and Characterization of Sustained Release of Metformin & Gliclazide bi-layered Tablets. Int. J. Bio, 2010, 1(2), 67-71.
  17. Adepu, S., Ramakrishna, S. Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status and Future Directions. Molecules 2021, 26, 5905. (https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195905)
  18. Langer, R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 1998, 392, 5-10.
  19. Yie. W.Chein. Novel Drug Delivery Systems, Second Edition Vol (50);301-375
  20. Gaurav Tiwari, Ruchi Tiwari, Saurabha K Bannerjee. Drug Delivery Systems: An Update Review. Int J Pharm Investig. 2012 Jan-Mar,2(1):2-11.
  21. Mohalkar R., Poul B, Patil S. S., Shetkar M. A., Chavan D., A Review on Immediate Release Drug Delivery Systems. Pharma Tutor, 2014, 2(8), 95-109.
  22. Ubhe T. S., Gedam P. A Brief Overview on Tablet and It's Types. Journal of Advancement in Pharmacology, 2020, 1(1), 21-31.
  23. Leon Lachman, Herbert A. Lieberman, Joseph L. Kanig: The theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, Varghese publication house, 3rd edition, 1990, 293-373.
  24. Herbert A. Liberman, Martin M. Rieger and Gilbert S. Banker, pharmaceutical dosage forms: Tablets; volume-I.
  25. Danielle S.W. Benoit, Clyde T. Overby, Kenneth R. Sims Jr., Marian A. Ackun- Farmmer, 2.5.12 Drug Delivery Systems, Biomaterials Science, Fourth Edition, Academic Press, 2020, 1237-1266,ISBN 9780128161371.(https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00078-7).
  26. Kaur Harbir. Processing Technologies for Pharmaceutical Tablets: A Review. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2012, 3 (7), 20-23.
  27. Panchal H. A, Tiwari A. K. A Novel Approach of Bi-layer Tablet Technology- a review. IR.JP. 2012, 3(5), 44-49.
  28. Sowmya C., Reddy C. S., Tabasum, S.G., Varma V. An overview on bi-layer tablets. IJPT: 2012, 4 (2), 2143-2156.
  29. Deshpande R. D. Gowda D. V., Nawaz M., Maramwar, D. N. Bi-layer tablets- An emerging trend: a review. IJPSR, 2011, 2(10), 2534-2544.
  30. Panda S., Mishra B., Behera S. Bi-Layer Tablets: An Emerging State of Art Technology in Dosage Form Design. Journal of Advances in Nanotechnology and its Applications, 2021, 3(2), 1-14.

Photo
Babu Anmulwad
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Madhav University Pindwara Sirohi Rajasthan 307026

Photo
Asha Chopde
Co-author

Madhav University Pindwara Sirohi Rajasthan 307026

Photo
Dr. Pawan Avhad
Co-author

Matoshri Institute of Pharmacy Dhanore Yeola Dis-Nashik

Photo
Kiran Thorat
Co-author

Ashok College of Pharmacy, Shrirampur.

Photo
Pritam Ghadge
Co-author

Loknete Shri Dadapatil Pharate college of pharmacy Mandavgan Pharata Tal Shirur Dist Pune

Babu Anmulwad, Asha Chopde, Dr. Pawan Avhad, Kiran Thorat, Pritam Ghadge, Formulation Development and Analytical Method Development of Dapsone and Ethoxzolamide Bilayer Tablet Used in Treatment of Severe Burn Dissertation, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 7, 2526-2538. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16081643

More related articles
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, ...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Garli...
Pankaj Kore, Pratiksha Parit, Saloni Pawar, Shital Vadar, Tushar ...
Advanced Formulation Strategies for Diabetic Foot ...
Devina Gaike, Rutuja Sahajrao, Ajay Rore, Dr. S. S. Angadi, ...
Integrating Herbal Bioenhancers into Advanced Drug-Delivery Systems: Trends and ...
Dnyaneshwar Shinde , Sayali Patil , Mahesh Said , Gaurav Zalte, Aditya Shinde, Divya Shinde, Varsha ...
Formulation And Evaluation of Spanlastic Gel Containing Econazole Nitrate...
Vaishnavi Krishna, Janavi M., Nirmala P., Lakshmi S. T., ...
Related Articles
A Review On: Coffee Bean-Based Herbal Face Scrub Formation and Evaluation...
Dikshita Valvi, Amol Gayke, Tejas Zond, Sakshi Jadhav, Snehal Mate, ...
Formulation and Evaluation of Aloe Vera Herbal Soap ...
Swapnil Talekar , Sachin Bhalekar , Sainath Gadekar , Pranay Chavan , Tejas Satpute , ...
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Remediation St...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
More related articles
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Remediation St...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Garlic (Allium Sativum) for its Pot...
Pankaj Kore, Pratiksha Parit, Saloni Pawar, Shital Vadar, Tushar Kawale, ...
Advanced Formulation Strategies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Bridging Current Marke...
Devina Gaike, Rutuja Sahajrao, Ajay Rore, Dr. S. S. Angadi, ...
Global Plastic Production, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Remediation St...
Sateesh Kumar Beepala, V. Luke Paul, Srividhya Maripi, ...
Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Garlic (Allium Sativum) for its Pot...
Pankaj Kore, Pratiksha Parit, Saloni Pawar, Shital Vadar, Tushar Kawale, ...
Advanced Formulation Strategies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Bridging Current Marke...
Devina Gaike, Rutuja Sahajrao, Ajay Rore, Dr. S. S. Angadi, ...