Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Jodhpur.
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of chronic joint disability worldwide [1, 2]. Its Ayurvedic counterpart, Sandhivata, is classified under Vatavyadhi, characterized by pain, stiffness, swelling, and crepitus [3–5]. Conventional management—including analgesics, NSAIDs, physiotherapy, and joint replacement—offers symptomatic relief but lacks curative potential and carries adverse effects [1, 2]. Ayurveda, with its emphasis on Shodhana (purification), Shamana (palliative), and Rasayana (rejuvenative) measures, provides a holistic framework for prevention and management. Objective: To synthesize classical Ayurvedic theory and contemporary biomedical evidence for managing Sandhivata and correlate Ayurvedic pathophysiology with modern OA mechanisms. Methods: Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, DHARA, and AYUSH Research Portal using terms such as “Sandhivata,” “Ayurveda AND Osteoarthritis,” “Panchakarma OA,” and “Boswellia.” Classical texts (Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, Ashtanga Hridaya, and Bhavaprakasha) were reviewed [3–6]. Studies were included if they evaluated Ayurvedic interventions in OA (clinical or preclinical). Results: Ayurvedic pathogenesis—vitiated Vata, Dhatu Kshaya of Asthi Dhatu, Shleshaka Kapha depletion, and Ama accumulation—correlates with cartilage loss, synovitis, and oxidative stress in modern OA [1, 2, 3–6]. Panchakarma procedures such as Abhyanga, Swedana, and Basti restore lubrication and mobility [3–6]. Herbs like Boswellia serrata [7, 9, 11, 12, 14–16], Commiphora wightii, and Withania somnifera [11, 14] show anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects. Clinical trials report significant improvements in WOMAC and VAS scores [7–13, 15, 16], with good safety profiles. Conclusion: Sandhivata management in Ayurveda offers a biologically plausible, multimodal approach targeting the structural, metabolic, and inflammatory dimensions of OA. Further standardized, biomarker-based RCTs are essential to validate its clinical utility.
OA affects an estimated 528 million people globally [1], producing pain, deformity, and impaired function. Conventional pharmacological therapy is symptomatic and limited by toxicity [1, 2]. Ayurveda conceptualizes Sandhivata as a degenerative Vata disorder (Vatavyadhi) [3–6]. The term combines Sandhi (joint) and Vata (the principle governing motion), depicting a degenerative and painful joint condition. The Ayurvedic paradigm attributes pathogenesis to Vata prakopa from aging, strain, improper diet, and metabolic waste (Ama). Therapeutic objectives extend beyond palliation to restoration of doshic balance, Agni correction, tissue nourishment, and rejuvenation [3–6].
2 Pathophysiology: A Correlative Perspective
2.1 Modern Understanding of OA
OA involves cartilage matrix degradation mediated by metalloproteinases (MMP-13, ADAMTS-5), chondrocyte apoptosis, and synovial inflammation with cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) [1, 2]. Subchondral bone remodeling, osteophyte formation, oxidative stress, and biomechanical overload perpetuate damage.
2.2 Ayurvedic Samprapti
According to Charaka and Sushruta, Sandhivata develops from aggravated Vata dosha lodging in Sandhi srotas [3, 4]. Dhatu Kshaya (tissue depletion) of Asthi and Majja Dhatu mirrors cartilage and bone loss [3, 5]. Shleshaka Kapha corresponds to synovial fluid; its depletion explains joint dryness and crepitus [3, 5]. Ama represents inflammatory metabolites that block microchannels, analogous to synovitis [4, 5].
2.3 Comparative Overview (Table 1)
|
Modern OA Concept |
Ayurvedic Correlate |
Commentary |
|
Cartilage degeneration |
Dhatu Kshaya (Asthi) |
Structural loss parallels tissue depletion |
|
Synovial inflammation (IL-1β, TNF-α) |
Ama + Pitta Sopha |
Corresponds to toxic–inflammatory buildup |
|
Lubrication loss |
Shleshaka Kapha Kshaya |
Reduced cushioning and friction |
|
Mechanical stress |
Ati-Vyayama, trauma |
Etiological factor for Vata aggravation |
|
Pain and stiffness |
Vata Prakopa |
Neuromuscular and nociceptive aspects |
(Adapted from [1–6]).
3 Ayurvedic Management Principles (Chikitsa Sutra)
3.1 Diagnosis (Nidana – Lakshana)
Causative factors: aging (Jara), excessive exertion (Ati-vyayama), cold exposure, fasting, erratic lifestyle, and dry diet (Ruksha Ahara) [3–6].
Symptoms: pain (Sandhishula), swelling (Shotha), stiffness (Stambha), crepitus (Atopa), and restricted motion [3–6].
3.2 Therapeutic Framework
Ayurvedic therapy follows a hierarchy: Shodhana → Shamana → Rasayana.
A. Shodhana Chikitsa (Purificatory Therapies) [3–6]
Snehana (Oleation): Abhyantara (ghee intake) & Bahya (oil massage – Abhyanga, Janu Basti) soften Vata-deranged tissues.
Swedana (Fomentation): Nadi Sweda, Patra Pinda Sweda relieve stiffness and mobilize Ama.
Basti (Medicated Enema): The principal therapy for Vata disorders; Matra Basti and Tikta-Ksheera Basti correct systemic Vata imbalance [3–6].
B. Shamana Chikitsa (Palliative Therapies)
Single Herbs (Ekal Dravya):
|
Herb |
Latin Name |
Reported Activity |
Key Reference |
|
Shallaki |
Boswellia serrata |
5-LOX inhibition, anti-inflammatory |
[7, 9, 11, 12, 14–16] |
|
Guggulu |
Commiphora wightii |
Anti-arthritic, NF-κB modulation |
[11, 14] |
|
Ashwagandha |
Withania somnifera |
Adaptogenic, chondroprotective |
[11, 14] |
|
Rasna |
Pluchea lanceolata |
Analgesic, anti-arthritic |
[11] |
Classical Formulations: Yogaraj Guggulu, Maharasnadi Kwatha, Simhanada Guggulu show clinical benefit in knee OA [7, 10, 20].
C. Diet and Lifestyle (Ahara–Vihara)
Warm, unctuous, nourishing diet; avoid cold, dry, stale food. Regular daily routine (Dinacharya), mild yoga (Pawanmuktasana, Tadasana), adequate rest, and mental calmness reduce Vata aggravation [3–6].
4 Clinical and Pre-clinical Evidence
4.1 Panchakarma and Multimodal Therapies
A large RCT (n = 151) comparing multimodal Ayurvedic treatment to guideline-based care demonstrated significantly greater pain reduction and function improvement sustained for 12 months [9, 10]. Smaller Indian trials combining Abhyanga, Janu Basti, and Basti also reported marked WOMAC improvement [7, 8, 19, 20].
4.2 Herbal and Polyherbal Formulations
Boswellia serrata extracts consistently reduce pain and improve function vs placebo [11, 12, 15, 16]. Yogaraj Guggulu and Ashwagandha Churna combinations show significant WOMAC score improvement [20]. Mechanistic studies reveal inhibition of 5-LOX, COX, and NF-κB pathways [14, 18].
Table 2. Representative Clinical Trials
|
No. |
Study & Year |
Design (n) |
Intervention |
Key Outcome |
Ref |
|
1 |
Kessler et al., 2022 |
RCT (151) |
Multimodal Ayurveda vs conventional |
↓Pain ↑Function @12 mo |
[9] |
|
2 |
Majeed et al., 2019 |
DB-RCT (60) |
Boswellia serrata extract |
↓VAS pain p<0.01 |
[11] |
|
3 |
Mohsenzadeh et al., 2023 |
DB-RCT (70) |
Topical Boswellia oil |
↓WOMAC p<0.05 |
[13] |
|
4 |
Kimmatkar et al., 2003 |
DB-RCT (30) |
Boswellia extract vs placebo |
Significant pain relief |
[15] |
|
5 |
Kachare et al., 2025 |
Open clinical (50) |
Yogaraj Guggulu + Ashwagandha |
↓WOMAC & ↑QoL |
[20] |
5 Mechanistic Insights
Figure 1.
6 DISCUSSION
Ayurveda’s multimodal strategy addresses the mechanical, inflammatory, and psychological dimensions of OA. Clinical trials demonstrate benefit with low toxicity [7–13, 15–20]. However, methodological limitations (small samples, heterogeneity, short follow-up) limit definitive conclusions [17, 21].
Future priorities:
7 CONCLUSION
Sandhivata reflects a degenerative joint process analogous to OA. Ayurvedic principles—purification, rejuvenation, and individualized care—offer a rational, complementary framework. Evidence from modern clinical and mechanistic studies supports its potential as a safe adjunct for symptom control and functional improvement. Further robust trials are warranted to validate and mainstream these interventions.
REFERENCES
Kailash Tada*, Gyan Prakash Sharma, Deelip Kumar Vyas, Vaidya Sadhana Dadhich, Jitendra Pal, Ayurvedic Management of Sandhivata (Osteoarthritis): A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Therapeutic Strategies, and Clinical Evidence, Int. J. of Pharm. Sci., 2025, Vol 3, Issue 10, 952-957 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17318455
10.5281/zenodo.17318455